Search Results

Search found 19967 results on 799 pages for 'document template'.

Page 203/799 | < Previous Page | 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 | Next Page >

jQuery code to track clicks on outgoing links (google analystics)

- by Tristan

Hello, I found this on the web: $('a[href^=http]:not("[href*=://' + document.domain + ']")').click(function() { pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/' + $(this).attr('href')); }); But it's not working. In my Google Analytics account there are no /outgoing/ links showing (it's been 24+ hours since I implemented it). What's wrong with this code? I'm using jQuery of course ;) (PS : i already have : <script type="text/javascript"> var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); </script> <script type="text/javascript"> try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA MY CODE"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}</script>)

Read the article
Get element using id problem

- by Ebe

I am modifying existing legacy webpages(which i shouldn't modify existing parts but adding) and the webpage uses document.write to write certain html elements. when i use <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"> var v = document.getElementById('td_date_cal_0'); alert(v); </script> v becomes null and when i create button and click <input type="button" id="mnbutton" onclick="mnLoader();" value="Click Me!" />; <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" > function mnLoader() { var v = document.getElementById("td_date_cal_0"); alert(v); } <br /> </script> Any idea, how to get the element without need of user action, such as clicking? Thanks, Ebe

Read the article
Does JSLint parse DOM functions?

- by Paul

I tried to use the parse() function of JSLint to parse three pieces of JavaScript code: function(b, c){var a = b + c; return a; } window.addEventListener('click', click_hanlder, true); document.documentElement.innerHTML; Here's the code, which is copied and pasted from the JSLint self-parse example: ` try { parse = make_parse(); var source = "something to parse";//replaced by the code above tree = parse(source); if (tree) { document.write(JSON.stringify(tree, ['key', 'name', 'message', 'value', 'arity', 'first', 'second', 'third', 'fourth'], 4)); } } catch (e) { document.write(JSON.stringify(e, ['name', 'message', 'from', 'to', 'key', 'value', 'arity', 'first', 'second', 'third', 'fourth'], 4)); } ` The output: returns a correct tree. returns a tree with only one node of "window". crashes the browser. I'm wondering whether JSLint doesn't support DOM function.

Read the article
Prevent content with child nodes from being deleted in umbraco

- by Soldarnal

I would like to prevent content nodes from being trashed if they have any children. I setup an event handler like so: public class KeepSafeEvents : ApplicationBase { public KeepSafeEvents() { Document.BeforeMoveToTrash += new Document.MoveToTrashEventHandler(Document_BeforeMoveToTrash); } void Document_BeforeMoveToTrash(Document sender, umbraco.cms.businesslogic.MoveToTrashEventArgs e) { if (sender.HasChildren) { e.Cancel = true; } } } However, this doesn't seem to work. I assume it is because the delete process moves the child nodes to trash first before dealing with the parent node (which then has no children). Is there another possible solution? Or am I making a simple mistake above?

Read the article
Simple Hide/Expand with Javascript

- by user478419

I have created a simple expand/hide test script: <html> <head> <script type="type/javascript"> </script> </head> <body> <div><a href="javascript:showHide('div_1035677');">more...</a></div> <div id="div_1035677" style="display:none"> HIDDEN CONTENT </div> </body> </html> I get an error message that I can't make any sense of (Object expected on line one). I don't see any errors in the above code. :-(

Read the article
Jquery: fade menu out when clicking on anything EXCEPT the menu itself, short piece of code.

- by ExodusNicholas

.saf_search is a button, when it's clicked, the menu .lisearch fades in, when you click anywhere on the page EXCEPT for on the menu .lisearch, then it should fade out(that's how it's SUPPOSED to work) Does anyone know why this isn't working? It fades in, and the first time i click anywhere on the page it fades out, but the second time i try to fade in the menu, it will quickly fade out again without me clicking the document. i think this has to do with .one, but i had it working before my hard drive crashed, and now i can't figure out how to get it working again... $('.saf_search').click(function() { $('.lisearch').fadeIn(200); }); $(document).click(function(){ jQuery(".lisearch").click(function(){ return false; }); jQuery(document).one("click", function() { jQuery(".lisearch").fadeOut(); }); });

Read the article
$("body").scrollTop() doesn't update in safari

- by Kristoffer Nolgren

I'm working on a website: http://beta.projektopia.se/ the body has several background-images that are updated on scroll like this: $(document).ready(function(){ $(document).scroll(function(){ var scrollfactor=$("body").scrollTop()*0.2; var centerscrollpos =scrollfactor+613; var docheight = $(document).height(); var windowheight = $(window).height(); var bottompos = (docheight-980)-((docheight-windowheight)*0.2)+scrollfactor; var scrollpos = 'center '+scrollfactor+'px,center '+bottompos+'px, center '+ centerscrollpos+'px,center 0px'; $("body").css("background-position", scrollpos); }); }); Lots of calculations, but the important thing is that a scrollpos is created that should change the position of the background when you scroll, to create a parallax-effect. It works great in chrome, but in firefox, the variable scrollfactor, that is suppose to get the current scroll-position, doesn't update. ps, some people have this issue due to lack of correct doctype. I believe i have declared it correctly like this: <!DOCTYPE html>

Read the article
Is it possible to Update Sharepoint List Without "ID" ?

- by Pari

I want to Upload File on Sharepoint and while apploading only i want to add all properties of Uploaded Document. We get ID field only when Document is uploaded on Sharepoint. Is there any other way to Update List without passing ID Field. Example: <Batch OnError="Continue" ListVersion="1" ViewName="270C0508-A54F-4387-8AD0-49686D685EB2"> <Method ID="1" Cmd="Update"> <Field Name="ID">4<Field> <Field Name="Field_Name">Value</Field> </Method> <Method ID="2" Cmd="Update"> <Field Name="ID" >6</Field> <Field Name="Field_Name">Value</Field> </Method> </Batch> Refering Link I am using Sharepoint Web Services.And Uploading Document in Chunks.**

Read the article
greasemonkey insert javascript

- by Kaartz

I have a bookmarklet, clicking the bookmarklet includes a PHP script (evaluated as a JavaScript file) to the page few table values and select values passed as GET parameters. The PHP script writes the page data to the MySQL database, and outputs a success message that is treated as JavaScript code and executed by the browser. Is there any possibility to do this using greasemonkey and call this function when a existing button is clicked on the web page. I wrote the above bookmarklet inspired by this tutorial. http://tutorialzine.com/2010/04/simple-bookmarking-app-php-javascript-mysql/ This is the bookmarklet code: (function () { var jsScript = document.createElement('script'); jsScript.setAttribute('type', 'text/javascript'); jsScript.setAttribute('src', '/bookmark.php?url=' + encodeURIComponent(location.href) + '&title=' + encodeURIComponent(document.title)); document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(jsScript); })(); Please help me.

Read the article
javascript - how to call a function newly added from ajax

- by strike_noir

I have a coding difficulty which have been asked in this forum before: Calling a JavaScript function returned from a Ajax response But I didn't find the answers quite satisfying. To be more precise of the problem I'm dealing, here is the details: I dynamically load a document (HTML and javascript) using jquery var url = 'document.php'; $('#container').load(url); And then I want to call the functions from that document.php. Due to my requirement, I don't want to call the function after the documents' loaded, but rather to call it later when I need it. Because it was dynamically loaded, the DOM doesn't recognize the functions. How to properly call this function? Thank you

Read the article
Add the list content at the end???

- by rajesh

Hi Actually my code is--- function addElement(url,imagePath){ alert(url); alert(imagePath); var container = document.getElementById('sncs'); var new_element = document.createElement('li'); new_element.innerHTML ="<a href='#'><img src='"+imagePath+"' alt='' title='' width='466' height='165' onClick=\"javascript:addWidget('"+url+"')\"></a>"; new_element.className="jcarousel-item jcarousel-item-horizontal jcarousel-item-4 jcarousel-item-4-horizontal"; container.insertBefore(new_element, container.firstChild); } function addWidget(url) { alert(url); // var url='http://www.boxyourtvtrial.com/songs/public/'; var main= document.getElementById('mainwidget'); main.innerHTML = "<iframe src='"+url+"' align='left' height='1060px' width='576px' scrolling='no' frameborder='0' id='lodex'></iframe>"; } but when we add the image itsnot going at the but is going in front... So please provid the solution

Read the article
How to batch retrieve documents with mongoDB?

- by edude05

Hello everyone, I have an application that queries data from a mongoDB using the mongoDB C# driver something like this: public void main() { foreach (int i in listOfKey) { list.add(getObjectfromDB(i); } } public myObject getObjFromDb(int primaryKey) { document query = new document(); query["primKey"] = primaryKey; document result= mongo["myDatabase"]["myCollection"].findOne(query); return parseObject(result); } On my local (development) machine to get 100 object this way takes less than a second. However, I recently moved the database to a server on the internet, and this query takes about 30 seconds to execute for the same number of object. Furthermore, looking at the mongoDB log, it seems to open about 8-10 connections to the DB to perform this query. So what I'd like to do is have the query the database for an array of primaryKeys and get them all back at once, then do the parsing in a loop afterwards, using one connection if possible. How could I optimize my query to do so? Thanks, --Michael

Read the article
How to use Javascript to create a checked radioButton in IE?

- by Chris

I was trying to create a checked radiobutton by using following code in IE7. But it doesn't work. var x = document.createElement(""); var spn=document.createElement("span"); spn.appendChild(x); x.checked=true; document.body.appendChild(spn); I found that I could put x.checked=true after appendChild statement to make it work. I also noticed that when I change "radio" to "checkbox", it can be checked without changing the order of statements. I am really confused by these facts. Am I doing something wrong in the above code?

Read the article
What is the best way to inject a javascript script from another domain into a page? (without using a

- by lowellk

Here is a snippet of javascript for loading a script onto a given page asynchronously. I was wondering if there was anything wrong with it? Can it be improved? I haven't played with this yet, but some things I'm worried about are: - cross browser support - when script.readyState is true, will the old version of that function get clobbered? - can i always count on there being a head or body element? Here it is: function injectScript(url, callback){ var script = document.createElement('script'); script.type = "text/javascript"; script.setAttribute('async', 'true'); script.src = url; (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(script); if (callback) { if (script.readyState){ script.onreadystatechange = function(){ if(script.readyState === "loaded" || script.readyState === "complete"){ script.onreadystatechange = null; callback(); } }; }else{ script.onload = function() { callback(); } } } }

Read the article
Print PDF from ASP.Net without preview

- by nmiranda

Hi, I've generated a pdf using iTextSharp and I can preview it very well in ASP.Net but I need to send it directly to printer without a preview. I want the user to click the print button and automatically the document prints. I know that a page can be sent directly to printer using the javascript window.print() but I don't know how to make it for a PDF. Edit: it is not embedded, I generate it like this; ... FileStream stream = new FileStream(Request.PhysicalApplicationPath + "~1.pdf", FileMode.Create); Document pdf = new Document(PageSize.LETTER); PdfWriter writer = PdfWriter.GetInstance(pdf, stream); pdf.Open(); pdf.Add(new Paragraph(member.ToString())); pdf.Close(); Response.Redirect("~1.pdf"); ... And here I am.

Read the article
Using Dom Objects in PHP, the default namespace is redeclared in some nodes.

- by TomcatExodus

I'm working on a template engine, having migrated from regex driven to DOM driven. It appears though, that whenever I create a DomDocumentFragment to encapsulate some portion of a document temporarily, the namespace attribute is added to each node in the fragment. Since my default namespace for a given document will 99% of the time be XHTML, it's adding the XHTML namespace declaration. Being the default namespace, this seems fruitless, and ultimately nodes in any other namespace will be stripped out at render time anyways. Aside from iteratively removing namespace attributes, is there some way I can prevent this from occurring to begin with? Its quite problematic, as this will likely increase render time filesize considerably, as large portions of a given document may be stored in a fragment. I've tried $doc->normalizeDocument(), but as I assumed, it did nothing.

Read the article
DOM Level 3 CustomEvents not bubbling on WebKit

- by Edu Felipe

I'm observing CustomEvents not bubbling, even though I set bubbling to true. The code below: var evt = document.createEvent("CustomEvent") evt.initCustomEvent("mycustomevent", true, false) var someh1 = document.getElementById("someh1") someh1.addEventListener("mycustomevent", function(){ alert("OMG!"); }) document.getElementsByTagName("body")[0].dispatchEvent(evt) With the HTML below: <html> <head></head> <body> <h1 id="someh1">content!</h1> </body> </html> Never shows the alert, demonstrating that the event is not bubbling down. Am I doing something wrong? Please note that if I do a getElementById("someh1") and run the dispatchEvent on it, the alert is displayed. Thanks!

Read the article
Is there a font that can't be recognised by an OCR?

- by user1820564

I am trying to write a document that can only be read by humans. The document content can't be copied. For that purpose, I am converting its pages to pictures and adding them back to a PDF file. The main issue is that any OCR program can get back the whole written text, especially that the page is going to be clear (as opposed to a scanned book) which will increase the OCR accuracy. So, is there a font that can't be recognized by an OCR. Otherwise, is there a technique that will make my document only readable by humans, yet unrecognised by an OCR? (for instance, adding a specific background, etc...) Thank you in advance.

Read the article
Test plans and how best to write them

- by Karim

We're trying to figure out the best way to write tests in our test plan. Specifically, when writing a test that is meant to be used by anyone including QA staff, should the steps in the test be very specific or more broad giving the tester more leeway in how the task can be accomplished. As a very simple example, if you're testing opening a document in word processing document, should the test read: Using the mouse, open the file menu Choose "Open File..." in the file menu In the open file dialog that appears, navigate to x and double-click the document called y OR Bring up the file open dialog Open the file y Now I realize one answer is probably going to be "it depends on what you're trying to test" but I'm trying to answer a broader question here: If the test steps are too specific do we risk a) making the testing process to laborious and tedious and more importantly b) do we risk missing something because we wrote down too specific a path to achieve a goal. Alternatively, if we make it broad do we depend too much on the whims of the tester at the time and lose crucial testing of paths that are more common to customers/clients?

Read the article
Ajax, not sending querystring data

- by Tom Gullen

var http = false; // Creates xmlhttp object if (navigator.appName == "Microsoft Internet Explorer") { http = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } else { http = new XMLHttpRequest(); } http.onreadystatechange = function() { if (http.readyState == 4) { alert(http.responseText); } } // Functions to calculate optimum layout etc. function compute() { var statusSpan = document.getElementById("cwStatus"); document.getElementById("fader").style.display = ""; document.getElementById("computingWait").style.display = ""; statusSpan.innerHTML = "<b>Status:</b> Realigning sattelites" http.open("GET", "alg.aspx?cr=8&cc=7&sq=3,3", true); http.send(null); } This code sort of works, but the querystring data isn't being passed through. It keeps returning an ASPX error page which only happens when there is no querystring data. Thanks for any help

Read the article
Custom events and event pooling in jQuery - What's the point?

- by Nick Lowman

I've been reading about custom events in jQuery and why they should be used but I'm still clearly missing the point. There is a very good article I read here that has the following code example; function UpdateOutput() { var name = $('#txtName').val(); var address = $('#txtAddress').val(); var city = $('#txtCity').val(); $('#output').html(name + ' ' + address + ' ' + city); } $(document).bind('NAME_CHANGE ADDRESS_CHANGE CITY_CHANGE', function() { UpdateOutput(); }); $('#txtAddress').keyup(function() { $(document).trigger('ADDRESS_CHANGE'); }); $('#txtCity').keyup(function() { $(document).trigger('CITY_CHANGE'); }); Can someone tell me why I just don't call the UpdateOutput() function directly? It would still work exactly the same way, i.e. $('#txtAddress').keyup(function() { UpdateOutput() }); $('#txtCity').keyup(function() { UpdateOutput() }); Many thanks

Read the article
How should I generate HTML to represent class and its properties?

- by Mike

Currently I have a class that represents a document. This document needs to be displayed as HTML. I would like to have a method to call such as GetHTML() that would then call GetHTML() on any properties/sections of the document that needed to be rendered. I was initially thinking about using linq and XElement but am wondering if that may cause issues with certain tags in HTML. Would I better off using an HtmlTextWriter? I am open to any suggestions or best practives for this situation. Thanks!

Read the article
facebook login button not rendering

- by Neha

Hi I am developing a widget that will be placed on an external website. The entire plugin has to be written in javascript. I haev searched here and there but am unable to make the facebook login button appear on the widget My code is the following var fbroot = document.createElement('div'); fbroot.id = "fb-root"; window.fbAsyncInit = function(){ FB.init('xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', '/xd_receiver.htm'); }; var contentRightDiv = document.createElement('div'); contentRightDiv.id = "contentrightdiv"; contentRightDiv.innerHTML = "<form><p><label>Sign in using <div id='socialmedialoginbtns'></div></label></p></form>"; var socialmedialoginbtns = document.getElementById('socialmedialoginbtns'); socialmedialoginbtns.innerHTML = '<fb:login-button show-faces="false" width="200" max-rows="1"></fb:login-button>';

Read the article
Ignoring "Content is not allowed in trailing section" SAXException

- by Paul J. Lucas

I'm using Java's DocumentBuilder.parse(InputStream) to parse an XML document. Occasionally, I get malformed XML documents in that there is extra junk after the final > that causes a SAXException: Content is not allowed in trailing section. (In the cases I've seen, the junk is simply one or more null bytes.) I don't care what's after the final >. Is there an easy way to parse an entire XML document in Java and have it ignore any trailing junk? Note that by "ignore" I don't simply mean to catch and ignore the exception: I mean to ignore the trailing junk, throw no exception, and to return the Document object since the XML up to an including the final > is valid.

Read the article
Simulate Click Javascript

- by Belgin Fish

Hi, I'm just wondering how I can have javascript simulate a click on a element. Currently I have <script type="text/javascript"> function simulateClick(control) { if (document.all) { control.click(); } else { var evObj = document.createEvent('MouseEvents'); evObj.initMouseEvent('click', true, true, window, 1, 12, 345, 7, 220, false, false, true, false, 0, null ); control.dispatchEvent(evObj); } } </script> <a href="http://www.google.com" id="mytest1">test 1</a><br> <script type="text/javascript"> simulateClick(document.getElementById('mytest1')); </script> But it's not working :( Any ideas?

Read the article

< Previous Page | 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 | Next Page >