Search Results

Search found 1454 results on 59 pages for 'eth0'.

Page 22/59 | < Previous Page | 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29  | Next Page >

  • Why wifi doesn't work in this case?

    - by xRobot
    I have a brand new notebook where I have installed Windows 7 and Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 64bit in dual boot. In windows 7 wifi works but in Ubuntu not. Could you help me please ? iwconfig lo no wireless extensions. wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:off/any Mode:Managed Access Point: Not-Associated Tx-Power=20 dBm Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Encryption key:off Power Management:off eth0 no wireless extensions. lshw -C network *-network description: Ethernet interface product: RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller vendor: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. physical id: 0 bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0 logical name: eth0 version: 07 serial: b4:b5:1f:1b:9a:56 size: 10Mbit/s capacity: 1Gbit/s width: 64 bits clock: 33MHz capabilities: pm msi pciexpress msix vpd bus_master cap_list ethernet physical tp mii 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd 1000bt 1000bt-fd autonegotiation configuration: autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=r8169 driverversion=2.3LK-NAPI duplex=half firmware=rtl8168e-3_0.0.4 03/27/12 latency=0 link=no multicast=yes port=MII speed=10Mbit/s resources: irq:41 ioport:3000(size=256) memory:c2404000-c2404fff memory:c2400000-c2403fff *-network description: Wireless interface product: Ralink corp. vendor: Ralink corp. physical id: 0 bus info: pci@0000:02:00.0 logical name: wlan0 version: 00 serial: 84:4b:f4:0a:3a:22 width: 32 bits clock: 33MHz capabilities: pm msi pciexpress bus_master cap_list ethernet physical wireless configuration: broadcast=yes driver=rt2800pci driverversion=3.2.0-31-generic firmware=0.34 latency=0 link=no multicast=yes wireless=IEEE 802.11bgn resources: irq:18 memory:c2500000-c250ffff lspci | grep -i net 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 07) 02:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. Device 539a iwlist scan lo Interface doesn't support scanning. wlan0 Interface doesn't support scanning : Device or resource busy eth0 Interface doesn't support scanning. lsmod Module Size Used by rfcomm 47604 0 bnep 18281 2 bluetooth 180104 10 rfcomm,bnep parport_pc 32866 0 ppdev 17113 0 snd_hda_codec_hdmi 32474 1 snd_hda_codec_realtek 224173 1 joydev 17693 0 hp_wmi 18092 0 sparse_keymap 13890 1 hp_wmi snd_hda_intel 33773 3 snd_hda_codec 127706 3 snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hda_intel snd_hwdep 13668 1 snd_hda_codec snd_pcm 97188 3 snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec snd_seq_midi 13324 0 snd_rawmidi 30748 1 snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event 14899 1 snd_seq_midi snd_seq 61896 2 snd_seq_midi,snd_seq_midi_event snd_timer 29990 2 snd_pcm,snd_seq snd_seq_device 14540 3 snd_seq_midi,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq psmouse 97362 0 snd 78855 16 snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_pcm,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq,snd_timer,snd_seq_device arc4 12529 2 rt2800pci 18715 0 rt2800lib 58925 1 rt2800pci crc_ccitt 12667 1 rt2800lib rt2x00pci 14577 1 rt2800pci rt2x00lib 51144 3 rt2800pci,rt2800lib,rt2x00pci mac80211 506816 3 rt2800lib,rt2x00pci,rt2x00lib soundcore 15091 1 snd mac_hid 13253 0 uvcvideo 72627 0 videodev 98259 1 uvcvideo v4l2_compat_ioctl32 17128 1 videodev wmi 19256 1 hp_wmi i915 473240 3 cfg80211 205544 2 rt2x00lib,mac80211 eeprom_93cx6 12725 1 rt2800pci drm_kms_helper 46978 1 i915 drm 242038 4 i915,drm_kms_helper i2c_algo_bit 13423 1 i915 snd_page_alloc 18529 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm mei 41616 0 serio_raw 13211 0 video 19596 1 i915 lp 17799 0 parport 46562 3 parport_pc,ppdev,lp usbhid 47199 0 hid 99559 1 usbhid r8169 62099 0 rfkill list: # rfkill list 0: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no 1: hp-wifi: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no

    Read the article

  • Multi subnet in ubuntu with dnsmasq

    - by Fox Mulder
    I have a multi lan port box that install ubuntu server 11.10. I am setup network in /etc/network/interfaces file as follow: auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static      address 192.168.128.254      netmask 255.255.255.0      network 192.168.128.0      broadcast 192.168.128.255      gateway 192.168.128.1      dns-nameservers xxxxxx auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static      address 192.168.11.1      netmask 255.255.255.0      network 192.168.11.0      broadcast 192.168.11.255 auto eth2 iface eth2 inet static      address 192.168.21.1      netmask 255.255.255.0      network 192.168.21.0      broadcast 192.168.21.255 auto eth3 iface eth3 inet static      address 192.168.31.1      netmask 255.255.255.0      network 192.168.31.0      broadcast 192.168.31.255 I am also enable the ip forward by echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/if_forward in rc.local. my dnsmasq config as follow except-interface=eth0 dhcp-range=interface:eth1,set:wifi,192.168.11.101,192.168.11.200,255.255.255.0 dhcp-range=interface:eth2,set:kids,192.168.21.101,192.168.21.200,255.255.255.0 dhcp-range=interface:eth3,set:game,192.168.31.101,192.168.31.200,255.255.255.0 the dhcp was working fine in eth1,eth2,eth3, any machine plug in the subnet can get correct subnet's ip. My problem was, each subnet machine can't ping each other. for example. 192.168.11.101 can't ping 192.168.21.101 but can ping 192.168.128.1 192.168.31.101 can't ping 192.168.21.101 but can ping 192.168.128.1 I am also try to using route add -net 192.168.11.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.11.1 (and also 192.168.21.0/192.168.31.0) at this multi-lan-port machine. But still won't work. Does anyone can help ? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Wireless connection by using command screen

    - by Amadeus
    I installed Ubuntu 12.04 armhf to my beagleboard-xm and now trying to connect to a wireless network. First, I checked if I can search for available networks: ubuntu@arm:~$ iwlist scan lo Interface doesn't support scanning. usb0 Interface doesn't support scanning. wlan0 Scan completed : Cell 01 - Address: EA:7D:EF:60:C9:0B Channel:1 Frequency:2.412 GHz (Channel 1) Quality=70/70 Signal level=-23 dBm Encryption key:on ESSID:"ghostrider" Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s Bit Rates:6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 48 Mb/s Mode:Ad-Hoc Extra:tsf=000000005a1ab50e Extra: Last beacon: 6242ms ago IE: Unknown: 000A67686F73747269646572 IE: Unknown: 010882848B962430486C IE: Unknown: 030101 IE: Unknown: 06020000 IE: Unknown: 2A0100 IE: Unknown: 2F0100 IE: Unknown: 32040C121860 IE: Unknown: 2D1A2C181BFF00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 IE: Unknown: 3D16010800000000FF000000000000000000000000000000 IE: Unknown: DD09001018020000000000 Then I edited /etc/network/interfaces file to the following: root@arm:/etc/wpa_supplicant# cat /etc/network/interfaces auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface auto eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp # Example to keep MAC address between reboots #hwaddress ether DE:AD:BE:EF:CA:FE # WiFi Example auto wlan0 iface wlan0 inet dhcp wpa-ssid "ghostrider" wpa-psk "b34d373eb2fb836a43b0afffe783c7d0af694724506c9e77b06d1021302905bf" But I cannot still connect to the wireless network: root@arm:/etc/wpa_supplicant# iwconfig lo no wireless extensions. usb0 no wireless extensions. wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn ESSID:off/any Mode:Managed Access Point: Not-Asociated Tx-Power=20 dBm Retry long limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr:off Encryption key:off Power Management:on eth0 no wireless extensions. root@arm:/etc/network# ifup wlan0 Failed to bring up wlan0. What is wrong? Should I change any other files also? But I think it was enough. By the way if you are curious about where that wpa-psk came from: zero@ghostrider:~$ wpa_passphrase ghostrider 34bddf67c2 network={ ssid="ghostrider" #psk="34bddf67c2" psk=b34d373eb2fb836a43b0afffe783c7d0af694724506c9e77b06d1021302905bf } I will appreciate any effort to help. Regards, Amadeus ps: Also I tried to connect manually: root@arm:/etc/network# iwconfig wlan0 essid ghostrider key s:34bddf67c2 But this did not solve my problem also.

    Read the article

  • Question Virtual Network and NAT set-up

    - by Jay
    Hi Guys! I need some help. I'm completely new to Linux. I'm trying to set up the following scenario: +-----+eth0 +-----+ +---+ | VM2 |-----------| VM1 |---------------| H | +-----+ eth1 +-----+eth0 (NAT) +---+ VM2 - Virtual machine from Virtual Box, using Ubuntu VM1 - Virtual machine from Virtual Box, using Ubuntu: I want this to act as a NAT. H - Host, my Windows Vista The dots were just added since after saving the spaces disappear. So if I ping H from VM2, H would receive a different IP address from VM2. Could you give me a step by step on this? All machines are of course 32 bit. Thanks. Would appreciate the help so much.

    Read the article

  • using curl command to download file in parts from different interfaces and to run the commands simultaneously from a script

    - by jsjain007
    i wanted to download a file using curl command simultaneously in different parts using ip aliasing(virtual Ethernet ports) so what i did was pasted the commands in a text file and run but the problem as obvious since it is in a file the commands will be executed one by one so is there a way to run all those commands simultaneously. here is the command curl --interface eth0:0 --range 0,38010880 http://wdl.cache.ijinshan.com/wps/download/Linux/unstable/kingsoft-office_9.1.0.4244~a12p3_i386.deb -o kinsoft-office.part1 curl --interface eth0:1 --range 38010880 ,- http://wdl.cache.ijinshan.com/wps/download/Linux/unstable/kingsoft-office_9.1.0.4244~a12p3_i386.deb -o kinsoft-office.part2 cat kinsoft-office.part*>kinsoft-office can anyone help me to run these above 2 commands simultaneously from the script so as to increase download speed

    Read the article

  • Hostname on intranet

    - by user7242
    I have a test server that is running Ubuntu Server in a windows network. Networking is configured as follows auto eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp hostname ca the command cat /etc/hostname returns ca. But when I use the command host 10.49.156.196 (its current IP address) from another machine on the network, it returns as follows: 196.156.49.10.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer owner-pc.xxxxx.xxx I can access the machine via SSH and browser using IP address, but not by name ca Any suggestions? I tried installing samba/nmbd as suggested in another post, but to no avail.

    Read the article

  • Setting Default Ubuntu eth port

    - by No1_Melman
    Background: I have a desktop computer running Ubuntu 12.04. I have installed DRBL to handle DHCP server and Clonezilla Server. I have a network card in my desktop with 2 ports in it. These 2 ports are bonded together and are used by DRBL. There is a 3rd port integrated in the motherboard. I want to use this 3rd port for internet. DRBL knows that this is set for internet. Ubuntu Network-Manager has stopped recognising the connections (device not managed). It use to say that eth1 was default (first port in the network card) I want eth0 to be default as that is the Internet port. Question: How do I make network-manager see eth0 as the defualt port?

    Read the article

  • Heartbeat won't successfully start up resources from a cold boot when a failed node is present

    - by Matthew
    I currently have two ubuntu servers running Heartbeat and DRBD. The servers are directory connected with a 1000Mbps crossover cable on eth1 and have access to an IP camera LAN on eth0. Now, let's say that one node is down and the remaining functional node is booting after having been shut down. The node that is still functioning won't start up heartbeat and provide access to the drbd resource from a cold boot. I have to manually restart heartbeat by sudo service heartbeat restart to get everything up and running. How can I get it to start fine from a cold start, when only one server is present? Here is the ha.cf: debug /var/log/ha-debug logfile /var/log/ha-log logfacility none keepalive 2 deadtime 10 warntime 7 initdead 60 ucast eth1 192.168.2.2 ucast eth0 10.1.10.201 node EMserver1 node EMserver2 respawn hacluster /usr/lib/heartbeat/ipfail ping 10.1.10.22 10.1.10.21 10.1.10.11 auto_failback off Some material from the syslog: harc[4604]: 2012/11/27_13:54:49 info: Running /etc/ha.d//rc.d/status status mach_down[4632]: 2012/11/27_13:54:49 info: /usr/share/heartbeat/mach_down: nice_failback: foreign resources acquired mach_down[4632]: 2012/11/27_13:54:49 info: mach_down takeover complete for node emserver2. Nov 27 13:54:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Initial resource acquisition complete (T_RESOURCES(us)) Nov 27 13:54:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: mach_down takeover complete. IPaddr[4679]: 2012/11/27_13:54:49 INFO: Resource is stopped Nov 27 13:54:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4605]: info: Local Resource acquisition completed. harc[4713]: 2012/11/27_13:54:49 info: Running /etc/ha.d//rc.d/ip-request-resp ip-request-resp ip-request-resp[4713]: 2012/11/27_13:54:49 received ip-request-resp IPaddr::10.1.10.254 OK yes ResourceManager[4732]: 2012/11/27_13:54:50 info: Acquiring resource group: emserver1 IPaddr::10.1.10.254 drbddisk::r0 Filesystem::/dev/drbd1::/shr::ext4 nfs-kernel-server IPaddr[4759]: 2012/11/27_13:54:50 INFO: Resource is stopped ResourceManager[4732]: 2012/11/27_13:54:50 info: Running /etc/ha.d/resource.d/IPaddr 10.1.10.254 start IPaddr[4816]: 2012/11/27_13:54:50 INFO: Using calculated nic for 10.1.10.254: eth0 IPaddr[4816]: 2012/11/27_13:54:50 INFO: Using calculated netmask for 10.1.10.254: 255.255.255.0 IPaddr[4816]: 2012/11/27_13:54:50 INFO: eval ifconfig eth0:0 10.1.10.254 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.1.10.255 IPaddr[4804]: 2012/11/27_13:54:50 INFO: Success ResourceManager[4732]: 2012/11/27_13:54:50 info: Running /etc/ha.d/resource.d/drbddisk r0 start Filesystem[4965]: 2012/11/27_13:54:50 INFO: Resource is stopped ResourceManager[4732]: 2012/11/27_13:54:50 info: Running /etc/ha.d/resource.d/Filesystem /dev/drbd1 /shr ext4 start Filesystem[5039]: 2012/11/27_13:54:50 INFO: Running start for /dev/drbd1 on /shr Filesystem[5033]: 2012/11/27_13:54:51 INFO: Success ResourceManager[4732]: 2012/11/27_13:54:51 info: Running /etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server start Nov 27 13:55:00 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Local Resource acquisition completed. (none) Nov 27 13:55:00 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: local resource transition completed. Nov 27 13:57:46 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Heartbeat shutdown in progress. (4586) Nov 27 13:57:46 EMserver1 heartbeat: [5286]: info: Giving up all HA resources. ResourceManager[5301]: 2012/11/27_13:57:46 info: Releasing resource group: emserver1 IPaddr::10.1.10.254 drbddisk::r0 Filesystem::/dev/drbd1::/shr::ext4 nfs-kernel-server ResourceManager[5301]: 2012/11/27_13:57:46 info: Running /etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server stop ResourceManager[5301]: 2012/11/27_13:57:46 info: Running /etc/ha.d/resource.d/Filesystem /dev/drbd1 /shr ext4 stop Filesystem[5372]: 2012/11/27_13:57:46 INFO: Running stop for /dev/drbd1 on /shr Filesystem[5372]: 2012/11/27_13:57:47 INFO: Trying to unmount /shr Filesystem[5372]: 2012/11/27_13:57:47 INFO: unmounted /shr successfully Filesystem[5366]: 2012/11/27_13:57:47 INFO: Success ResourceManager[5301]: 2012/11/27_13:57:47 info: Running /etc/ha.d/resource.d/drbddisk r0 stop ResourceManager[5301]: 2012/11/27_13:57:47 info: Running /etc/ha.d/resource.d/IPaddr 10.1.10.254 stop IPaddr[5509]: 2012/11/27_13:57:47 INFO: ifconfig eth0:0 down IPaddr[5497]: 2012/11/27_13:57:47 INFO: Success Nov 27 13:57:47 EMserver1 heartbeat: [5286]: info: All HA resources relinquished. Nov 27 13:57:48 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: killing /usr/lib/heartbeat/ipfail process group 4603 with signal 15 Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: killing HBFIFO process 4589 with signal 15 Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: killing HBWRITE process 4590 with signal 15 Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: killing HBREAD process 4591 with signal 15 Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: killing HBWRITE process 4592 with signal 15 Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: killing HBREAD process 4593 with signal 15 Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: killing HBWRITE process 4594 with signal 15 Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: killing HBREAD process 4595 with signal 15 Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: killing HBWRITE process 4596 with signal 15 Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: killing HBREAD process 4597 with signal 15 Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: killing HBWRITE process 4598 with signal 15 Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: killing HBREAD process 4599 with signal 15 Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Core process 4589 exited. 11 remaining Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Core process 4596 exited. 10 remaining Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Core process 4598 exited. 9 remaining Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Core process 4590 exited. 8 remaining Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Core process 4595 exited. 7 remaining Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Core process 4591 exited. 6 remaining Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Core process 4592 exited. 5 remaining Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Core process 4593 exited. 4 remaining Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Core process 4597 exited. 3 remaining Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Core process 4594 exited. 2 remaining Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: Core process 4599 exited. 1 remaining Nov 27 13:57:49 EMserver1 heartbeat: [4586]: info: emserver1 Heartbeat shutdown complete. Here is some more from the log ResourceManager[2576]: 2012/11/28_16:32:42 info: Acquiring resource group: emserver1 IPaddr::10.1.10.254 drbddisk::r0 Filesystem::/dev/drbd1::/shr::ext4 nfs-kernel-server IPaddr[2602]: 2012/11/28_16:32:42 INFO: Running OK Filesystem[2653]: 2012/11/28_16:32:43 INFO: Running OK Nov 28 16:32:52 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: WARN: node emserver2: is dead Nov 28 16:32:52 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Dead node emserver2 gave up resources. Nov 28 16:32:52 EMserver1 ipfail: [1807]: info: Status update: Node emserver2 now has status dead Nov 28 16:32:52 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Link emserver2:eth1 dead. Nov 28 16:32:53 EMserver1 ipfail: [1807]: info: NS: We are still alive! Nov 28 16:32:53 EMserver1 ipfail: [1807]: info: Link Status update: Link emserver2/eth1 now has status dead Nov 28 16:32:55 EMserver1 ipfail: [1807]: info: Asking other side for ping node count. Nov 28 16:32:55 EMserver1 ipfail: [1807]: info: Checking remote count of ping nodes. Nov 28 16:32:57 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Heartbeat shutdown in progress. (1695) Nov 28 16:32:57 EMserver1 heartbeat: [2734]: info: Giving up all HA resources. ResourceManager[2751]: 2012/11/28_16:32:57 info: Releasing resource group: emserver1 IPaddr::10.1.10.254 drbddisk::r0 Filesystem::/dev/drbd1::/shr::ext4 nfs-kernel-server ResourceManager[2751]: 2012/11/28_16:32:57 info: Running /etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server stop ResourceManager[2751]: 2012/11/28_16:32:57 info: Running /etc/ha.d/resource.d/Filesystem /dev/drbd1 /shr ext4 stop Filesystem[2829]: 2012/11/28_16:32:57 INFO: Running stop for /dev/drbd1 on /shr Filesystem[2829]: 2012/11/28_16:32:57 INFO: Trying to unmount /shr Filesystem[2829]: 2012/11/28_16:32:58 INFO: unmounted /shr successfully Filesystem[2823]: 2012/11/28_16:32:58 INFO: Success ResourceManager[2751]: 2012/11/28_16:32:58 info: Running /etc/ha.d/resource.d/drbddisk r0 stop ResourceManager[2751]: 2012/11/28_16:32:58 info: Running /etc/ha.d/resource.d/IPaddr 10.1.10.254 stop IPaddr[2971]: 2012/11/28_16:32:58 INFO: ifconfig eth0:0 down IPaddr[2958]: 2012/11/28_16:32:58 INFO: Success Nov 28 16:32:58 EMserver1 heartbeat: [2734]: info: All HA resources relinquished. Nov 28 16:32:59 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: killing /usr/lib/heartbeat/ipfail process group 1807 with signal 15 Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: killing HBFIFO process 1777 with signal 15 Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: killing HBWRITE process 1778 with signal 15 Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: killing HBREAD process 1779 with signal 15 Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: killing HBWRITE process 1780 with signal 15 Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: killing HBREAD process 1781 with signal 15 Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: killing HBWRITE process 1782 with signal 15 Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: killing HBREAD process 1783 with signal 15 Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: killing HBWRITE process 1784 with signal 15 Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: killing HBREAD process 1785 with signal 15 Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: killing HBWRITE process 1786 with signal 15 Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: killing HBREAD process 1787 with signal 15 Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Core process 1778 exited. 11 remaining Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Core process 1779 exited. 10 remaining Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Core process 1780 exited. 9 remaining Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Core process 1781 exited. 8 remaining Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Core process 1782 exited. 7 remaining Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Core process 1783 exited. 6 remaining Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Core process 1784 exited. 5 remaining Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Core process 1785 exited. 4 remaining Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Core process 1786 exited. 3 remaining Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Core process 1787 exited. 2 remaining Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: Core process 1777 exited. 1 remaining Nov 28 16:33:01 EMserver1 heartbeat: [1695]: info: emserver1 Heartbeat shutdown complete. If I restarted heartbeat at this point... the resources heartbeat controls would start up fine.... please help!

    Read the article

  • Address (url) forwarding with Vyatta

    - by Trikks
    Hi Got this kind of noob question i suppose. I got this very basic network setup and need help to set up some address forwarding. As seen in my illustration below all traffic enters via the eth0 interface (85.123.32.23). The external dns is setup to direct all hosts to this ip as well. Now, how on earth do I filter the incoming requests to each box? The Ip's are static! Se the network layout here: http://vyatta.org/files/u11160/setup.png I do not wish to solve this by assigning tons of ports etc. In my wishful thinking something like this would be nice :) set service nat rule 10 type destination set service nat rule 10 inbound-interface eth0 set service nat rule 10 destination address ftp.myhost.com set service nat rule 10 inside-address address 192.168.100.20 This way ALL traffic to the address ftp.myhost.com (at eth0) should be routed to the internal ip, 192.168.100.20. Right, is there anyone who could point in some direction? Maybe it's wrong to use nat? Please help me! :)

    Read the article

  • Address (url) forwarding with Vyatta

    - by Trikks
    Got this kind of noob question i suppose. I got this very basic network setup and need help to set up some address forwarding. As seen in my illustration below all traffic enters via the eth0 interface (85.123.32.23). The external dns is setup to direct all hosts to this ip as well. Now, how on earth do I filter the incoming requests to each box? The Ip's are static! My network layout: I do not wish to solve this by assigning tons of ports etc. In my wishful thinking something like this would be nice :) set service nat rule 10 type destination set service nat rule 10 inbound-interface eth0 set service nat rule 10 destination address ftp.myhost.com set service nat rule 10 inside-address address 192.168.100.20 This way ALL traffic to the address ftp.myhost.com (at eth0) should be routed to the internal ip, 192.168.100.20. Right, is there anyone who could point in some direction? Maybe it's wrong to use nat? Please help me! :)

    Read the article

  • SNAT through Racoon IPSec VPN

    - by Mite fine d'ailes
    I am trying to route traffic from a device (that I will call "target") connected to my Ubuntu box (that I will call "host") to servers at a remote office. The host uses a Racoon IPSec VPN, connected through a NIC called efix. This creates an aliased IF called efix:0 which has IP adress 192.168.190.132. It is able to reach the servers. The link between host and target is an Ethernet link, using IP adresses 10.0.0.1 on IF eusb for the host and 10.0.0.2 on IF eth0 for the target. I have setup the following routes and iptables entries: On target: 10.0.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 default 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 On host: echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.0.0.0/24 -j SNAT --to 192.168.190.132 iptables -A FORWARD -s 10.0.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT Using Wireshark to monitor an HTTP GET, I can see SYN packets from the target go all the way to the server, but the server's SYNACK packets stop at the host and are not forwarded to the target. Am I missing something here ? Isn't SNAT supposed to keep track of the connections ?

    Read the article

  • Failed to bring up eth1 in a dual ips solution in ubuntu

    - by lxyu
    I'm using ubuntu 12.04. I tried to assign two ips to two ethernet cards in my server. The content of /etc/network/interfaces is like this: auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 114.80.156.a netmask 255.255.255.224 gateway 114.80.156.b auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static address 114.80.156.c netmask 255.255.255.240 gateway 114.80.156.d a b c d have different values, which means the two ips are in different vlans. But I can only bring up eth0 with this command: $ /etc/init.d/networking restart RTNETLINK answers: File exists Failed to bring up eth1. ...done. I have checked the question here which shows the same problem like the one I encountered: Can only bring up one of two interfaces But it seems it's not really solved. And in my situation, I need the 2 ips to use 2 different gateways. So how to fix this problem? Edit1, changed the example config ip from 192.168.0.0/16 subnet to another 'real' subnet. Edit2, the purpose of doing this is fairly simple. Because the ip range I previous in don't have more room for new servers, and I have to move to another ip range. So I want to make the public servers bind to 2 ips for the transition period. I only have really limited knowledge about routing and subnet. @BillThor @rackandboneman, would you please give me some keywords or links on how to setup route for 2 ips? and @Mike Pennington, how do you know I speak chinese?

    Read the article

  • Linux udev persistent net rule

    - by Anonymous
    I have a Linux system (Slackware Linux 13.0) with two network interfaces. Let's call them NIC0 and NIC1 My goal is to make NIC0 to appear as eth0 in the system. I know this can be achieved via udev rules that map network aliases to MAC addresses of network interfaces. In Slackware Linux the file /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules contains such rules. The trickiest part of my problem is that I need to fake the MAC address of NIC0. I know I can dynamically change the MAC addres of a network interface with the command: ifconfig eth0 hw ether <new MAC address> Do you see the problem? This supposes that the network interfaces are already set up. So my question is: If I would have an udev rule for NIC1(the one that shall go up as eth1, with its original MAC address), would it be enough for the system to bring the other network interface (NIC0) as eth0 by default? This way I could change its MAC address later, after the udev machinery completes and the network aliases are brought up.

    Read the article

  • How do I apply multiple subnets to a server with one NIC?

    - by Cosban
    I am trying to route multiple IPs through one physical NIC on my dedicated server for use with Proxmox KVM VMs. I have a dedicated server which is currently running Debian 4.4.5-8 with 3 available ip addresses for use, which will be displayed as 176.xxx.xxx.196 (main), 176.xxx.xxx.198 (on same subnet as main) and 5.xxx.xxx.166 (different subnet). I am currently trying to route the third IP address with the dedi for use with a vps that I have set up using proxmox v2.x but am having a really, really hard time doing so. Virtual interfaces binding the additional IP addresses work as expected, ruling out external routing problems. The provider has given the following information for the IP addresses on the main subnet: gateway: 176.xxx.xxx.193 netmask: 255.255.255.224 broadcast: 176.xxx.xxx.223 As well as the following information for the IP address on the second subnet: gateway: 5.xxx.xxx.161 netmask: 255.255.255.248 broadcast: 5.xxx.xxx.167 Everything I've tried with /etc/network/interfaces has either not worked, or has rendered the network completely useless. This is the current state of the file, which has the secondary IP address working on the same subnet as well as IPv6 working, but not the second subnet. # Nativen IPv6 Schnittstelle iface eth0 inet6 manual # Bridge IPv4 Schnittstelle (176.xxx.xxx.193/27) auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 inet static address 176.xxx.xxx.196 netmask 255.255.255.224 gateway 176.xxx.xxx.193 broadcast 176.xxx.xxx.223 bridge_ports eth0 bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 bridge_maxwait 0 post-up ip addr add 176.xxx.xxx.198/27 dev vmbr0 auto vmbr1 iface vmbr1 inet static address 5.xxx.xxx.166 netmask 255.255.255.248 gateway 5.xxx.xxx.161 broadcast 5.xxx.xxx.167 bridge_ports eth0 bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 bridge_maxwait 0 post-up ip addr add 5.xxx.xxx.166/27 dev vmbr1 # Bridge IPv6 Schnittstelle (Reichweite: xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx::/64) iface vmbr0 inet6 static address xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx netmask 64 up ip -6 route add xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx dev vmbr0 down ip -6 route del xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx dev vmbr0 up ip -6 route add default via xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx dev vmbr0 down ip -6 route del default via xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx dev vmbr0

    Read the article

  • How to enable Ipv6 on my ubunutu 11.04 virtual machine

    - by liv2hak
    I have installed 3 VM's on my PC.(Ubuntu 11.04).I want to setup an IPV6 network to review and test some of the IPV6 tools like NDPMonitor.(monitors ICMP messages of Neighbour Discovery Protocol.) IP v6 addresses are as follows. linux_router - fe80::a00:27ff:fed5:f7e9/64 labhack1 - fe80::a00:27ff:fed2:8bd1/64 labhack2 - fe80::a00:27ff:fed7:2f2d/64 The below commands have been run on both linux_router and labhack1. sudo ip r a 2001:468:181:f100::/64 dev eth0 sudo vim /etc/radvd.conf /file looks like below./ interface eth0 { AdvSendAdvert on; /*means that we are sending out advertisments.*/ MinRtrAdvInterval 5; /*these options control how often advertisments are sent*/ MaxRtrAdvInterval 15; /*these are not mandatory but valueable settings.*/ prefix fe80::a00:27ff::/64 { AdvOnLink on; /*Says to the host everyone sharing this prefix is on the sam local link as you.*/ AdvAutonomous on; /*Says to a host: "Use this prefix to autoconfigure your address"*/ }; }; sudo sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1 I try to do a ping6 -I eth0 fe80::a00:27ff:fed5:f7e9 I get Destination unreachable: Address unreachable.I am not sure what I am doing wrong here.I am a beginner at linux administration.Basically I think I am missing whatever is analogous to physically connecting VM's.Any help that would point me in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • server and user directly connected no pinging...

    - by jtzero
    I have a server(fedora 12) with two nics on it, directly connected to say 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0 the route table looks like this Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 eth0 = 192.168.1.15 eth1 = 192.168.2.1 and a directly connected user (Mythdora) on the 192.168.2.0 network with ip 192.168.2.2 and route table like so Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 the cable is a crossover and it works all three nics work -- connected my laptop to either end and assign it a valid 192.168.2.0 ip the pings will work. In fact if I disconnect the server side and plug the eth cable into the laptop and have thte box ping the laptop continually remove the eth cable and plug it back into the server both sides ping... unfortunately the box realizing it's connected to a different pc wipes its route table after say ten minutes or so. if I do a trace route from a box on the 1.0 network to the servers 192.168.2.1 interface never get a reply from it. as a note at one point I could ping the server from the 192.168.2.2 box but the server couldnt ping the 192.168.2.2 box.

    Read the article

  • Add IPv6 support to DirectAdmin server

    - by George Boot
    I just set up an new DirectAdmin, and I want to prepare it for IPv6 use. My ISP have gave me an range of IPv6 addresses that I can use. Lets say that address is 2a01:7c8:**:1f::. My neworkadapter user DHCP to resolves its IP-addresses. When i type ifoncig eth0 I get the following result: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:**:**:**:ce:f3 inet addr:37.**.**.44 Bcast:37.**.**.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: 2a01:7c8:****:1f::/64 Scope:Global inet6 addr: fe80::5054:ff:fe87:cef3/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:38941 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:29439 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:3779534 (3.6 MiB) TX bytes:5089379 (4.8 MiB) As you can see, I have an IPv6 address set, but I can't ping6 an IPv6 host. I get the error: connect: Network is unreachable. I decided that I needed an gateway, so I tryed to add one: ip -6 route add default via 2a01:7c8:****::1 dev eth0 (2a01:7c8:**::1 is the gateway of my ISP). But it trows an error: RTNETLINK answers: No route to host. Does somebody know what to do, and how to solve this issue? Thanks a lot!

    Read the article

  • bond0 and xen = crash

    - by Rajat
    Bonding with xen 1 - Stop all guests. Reboot dom0 after running "chkconfig xend off" and "chkconfig xendomains off". 2 - Configure bond0 by enslaving eth0 and eth1 to it. I added the below two entries to /etc/modprobe.conf. alias bond0 bonding options bond0 mode=6,miimon=100 Content of /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 USERCTL=no ONBOOT=yes MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes BOOTPROTO=none Content of /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 USERCTL=no ONBOOT=yes MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes BOOTPROTO=none Content of /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0 DEVICE=bond0 IPADDR= NETMASK= ONBOOT=yes BOOTPROTO=static USERCTL=no Did "modprobe bond0" and "service network restart" after that. 3 - Edit /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp Change (network-script network-bridge) To (network-script 'network-bridge netdev=bond0') 4 - Start xend. "service xend start". 5 - chkconfig xend on. 6 - modprode bond0 7 - more /proc/net/bonding/bond0 8 - Create guest images as usual and bridge it to xenbr0. about config i did for my xen kernel rhel 5.3 after i reboot the host server i get in place bond0 get pbond0 and its get disconnect from network only i ping to my vm's on the host server any one have any idea why xen bond0 is acting like that or what is solutions to come out of pbond0 to bond0.

    Read the article

  • tap interfaces always disabled in linux bridge

    - by Dani Camps
    I have a physical interface eth0, and I want to create two virtual interfaces and bridge them with eth0. For this purpose I do: #Create the virtual interfaces tunctl -t tap0 tunctl -t tap1 ifconfig tap0 up ifconfig tap1 up #Create the bridge brctl addbr br0 brctl stp br0 off brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 tap0 brctl addif br0 tap1 #Turning up the bridge ifconfig br0 up However my problem if that the tap interfaces always appear disabled in the bridge, and no traffic flows to them. $brctl show br0 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.080027cabeba no eth2 tap0 tap1 $brctl showstp br0 br0 bridge id 8000.080027cabeba designated root 8000.080027cabeba root port 0 path cost 0 max age 20.00 bridge max age 20.00 hello time 2.00 bridge hello time 2.00 forward delay 15.00 bridge forward delay 15.00 ageing time 300.01 hello timer 0.00 tcn timer 0.00 topology change timer 0.00 gc timer 298.42 flags eth2 (1) port id 8001 state forwarding designated root 8000.080027cabeba path cost 4 designated bridge 8000.080027cabeba message age timer 0.00 designated port 8001 forward delay timer 12.97 designated cost 0 hold timer 1.24 flags tap0 (2) port id 8002 state disabled designated root 8000.080027cabeba path cost 100 designated bridge 8000.080027cabeba message age timer 0.00 designated port 8002 forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 0 hold timer 0.00 flags tap1 (3) port id 8003 state disabled designated root 8000.080027cabeba path cost 100 designated bridge 8000.080027cabeba message age timer 0.00 designated port 8003 forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 0 hold timer 0.00 flags Is there any way to set the tap interfaces in forwarding state? I do not understand why they are not because STP is disabled. Cheers Daniel

    Read the article

  • Shorewall log question.

    - by Shikoru
    I have been getting various attempts to connect to ports on my shorewall firewall. The ports that I keep seeing connection attempts at are tcp 44444, tcp 44446, udp 55555 and every now and then some slight variation. I ran "netstat -a" and did not see anything listening on those ports. Is this something that I should be worried about or is it just some rouge computers out there? I have noticed alot of the ip addresses are from Spain and Mexico. May 25 18:39:35 Takkun kernel: [62516.626514] Shorewall:net2fw:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:d0:b7:65:d4:13:34:ef:xx:xx:xx:81:08:00 SRC=200.124.9.113 DST=72.xxx.xxx.xxx LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=112 ID=51796 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=2071 DPT=44446 WINDOW=16384 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 May 25 18:39:52 Takkun kernel: [62535.433285] Shorewall:net2fw:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:d0:b7:65:d4:13:34:ef:xx:xx:xx:81:08:00 SRC=72.50.95.174 DST=72.xxx.xxx.xxx LEN=90 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=105 ID=31130 PROTO=UDP SPT=59505 DPT=55555 LEN=70 May 25 18:40:05 Takkun kernel: [62548.963413] Shorewall:net2fw:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:d0:b7:65:d4:13:34:ef:xx:xx:xx:81:08:00 SRC=77.12.37.1 DST=72.xxx.xxx.xxx LEN=90 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=108 ID=9585 PROTO=UDP SPT=20401 DPT=55555 LEN=70 That is the jist of what im seeing.

    Read the article

  • IPv6 Routing / Subnetting

    - by nappo
    Recently I have installed Citrix Xen Server 6.2 on a machine. My Provider (Hetzner) gave me the IPv6 Subnet 2a01:4f8:200:xxxx::/64. Followed an article in the providers wiki (1) i got it working and can assign IPs to my guests (CentOS). However i can't assign a second IP to a single guest - it will result in a timeout. I'm not very familiar with IPv6 routing / subnetting - any help or tips for further troubleshooting is welcome! My Setup: XenServer 6.2 IPv6: 2a01:4f8:200:xxxx::2/112 ip -6 route: 2a01:4f8:200:xxxx::/112 dev xenbr0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 fe80::1 dev xenbr0 metric 1024 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 default via fe80::1 dev xenbr0 metric 1024 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0 Guest 1 IPv6: 2a01:4f8:200:xxxx::3/64 IPv6: 2a01:4f8:200:xxxx::4/64 ip -6 route: 2a01:4f8:200:xxxx::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 default via fe80::1 dev eth0 metric 1 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 Guest 2 IPv6: 2a01:4f8:200:xxxx::5/64 Guest 1 IPv6 is working fine, Guest 2 too. As suggested by the wiki article (1) i split my /64 network into a /112. Is it right to set the host /112 and the guests /64? Why is that?

    Read the article

  • EC2 instance is blocking all outbound connections, how to diagnose/fix?

    - by Fraggle
    My EC2 instance is blocking all outbound connections. wget http://www.google.com ==> Hangs ping google.com ==>hangs ssh user@anyserver ==>hangs I ran : sudo iptables -F to eliminate all rules to no avail AWS Management console shows Security Group for that instance has Inbound rule allowing ssh and port 80. Can't find anything about Outbound rules there. Rebooted instance, no change. If anyone knows how to diagnose or fix, please help. Adding info: [ec2-user@ip-10-112-62-73 ~]$ ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 12:31:3D:06:31:BB inet addr:10.112.62.73 Bcast:10.112.63.255 Mask:255.255.254.0 inet6 addr: fe80::1031:3dff:fe06:31bb/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1933 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1764 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:164075 (160.2 KiB) TX bytes:343256 (335.2 KiB) Interrupt:9 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:672 (672.0 b) TX bytes:672 (672.0 b) [ec2-user@ip-10-112-62-73 ~]$ ip route show 10.112.62.0/23 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.112.62.73 default via 10.112.62.1 dev eth0

    Read the article

  • Setting up a Network Bridge on Linux VM (Windows 7 Host)

    - by GrandAdmiral
    I would like to use NetEm to simulate a low bandwidth environment while testing an Internet-connected device. My plan is to setup a bridge in a Linux VM (Linux Mint 13) on a Windows 7 host. Unfortunately I'm having trouble setting up the bridge. Then I can use NetEm in the Linux VM to limit the bandwidth to an external device. I went with the following script: ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 promisc up ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 promisc up Then create the bridge and bring it up: brctl addbr br0 brctl setfd br0 0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth1 dhclient br0 ifconfig br0 up When I run that script, I see the following warning: Rather than invoking init scripts through /etc/init.d, use the service(8) utility, e.g. service smbd reload Since the script you are attempting to invoke has been converted to an Upstart job, you may also use the reload(8) utility, e.g. reload smbd The device connecting to the bridge is able to obtain an IP Address, but it can only ping the IP Address of the bridge (both are 10.2.32.xx). Then after a few minutes, other parts of our network go down. I'm not sure why, but once I kill the bridge the network is fine. Is it possible to setup a network bridge in a Linux VM? Do I need to do something else with the dhclient br0 part of the script? By the way, I'm using VirtualBox. The wired connection is eth0 and the wireless connection is eth1. The wired connection is connecting to the device and the wireless connection is going to the network. Both adapters are set up as bridged adapters with promiscuous mode set to "allow all".

    Read the article

  • Can't ping through default gateway

    - by Andrew G.H.
    I have the following configuration: Routing table on M3 is: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.192 U 0 0 0 eth0 Routing table on M1 is: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 So basically M3's gateway is M1, and M1's gateway is M2's wireless internet interface. If I ping 8.8.8.8 from M1, everything is ok, replies are received. Pinging from M1 to M3 and viceversa is also possible. I have configured M1 as gateway trafic forwarder using firestarter package and stopped firewall with it. iptables policies are ACCEPT for everything. Problem: I have tried ping-ing ip 8.8.8.8 from M3 but without success. What could be the source of this problem?

    Read the article

  • How do I load balance between two Linux machines?

    - by William Hilsum
    Inspired by the Stack Overflow network, I am now obsessed with HAProxy and trying to use it myself. At the moment, each HAProxy box has got two network cards (well, two configured, I can have a maximum of 4 and wasn't sure if they needed their own one for management between the boxes). On both machines, the backend one (eth1) is a private IP that goes to a switch connected to the webservers, and the front facing one (eth0) has a public internet IP that is routed straight though. In addition, I have created an additional virtual ip for eth0 called eth0:0 which has got a third public ip address. I just about get how to use it for load balancing between multiple web servers that are behind it, but, I am failing to load balance between the two HAProxy boxes - they appear to fight for the virtual IP, but, this does not appear to be a smart solution. Now, by using the virtual shared IP address, this solution appears to work and does seem to give me maximum uptime, but, is this the correct way to do it, or is there a smarter way? I have been looking at other Linux packages such as keepalived, but, I have only been using Linux (server) for a week now and am at the limits of my understanding. Is there anyone who has done this before and can you advise anything for maximum uptime?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29  | Next Page >