Search Results

Search found 4664 results on 187 pages for 'markup extensions'.

Page 22/187 | < Previous Page | 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29  | Next Page >

  • 'System.Windows.Data.MultiBinding' is not a valid value for property 'Text'.

    - by chaiguy
    I'm trying to write a custom MarkupExtension that allows me to use my own mechanisms for defining a binding, however when I attempt to return a MultiBinding from my MarkupExtension I get the above exception. I have: <TextBlock Text="{my:CustomMarkup ...}" /> CustomMarkup returns a MultiBinding, but apparently Text doesn't like being set to a MultiBinding. How come it works when I say: <TextBlock> <TextBlock.Text> <MultiBinding ... /> </TextBlock.Text> </TextBlock> But it doesn't work the way I'm doing it?

    Read the article

  • If I prefer semantic naming then shouldn't i use any CSS Framework and grid approach?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    If I prefer semantic naming then shouldn't i use any CSS Framework and grid approach? Which approach is better Grid or Freehand? Is any CSS Frameworks really can save time and make semantic code even for Experienced CSS developer? Many CSS Frameworksd are popular in SIMPLE PSD 2 XHTML CSS and in wordpress/drupal/joomla theme development. Can we make CSS XHTML development as faster as with CSS frameworks but without using CSS Grid Frameworks? What makes development with CSS frameworks faster which we can't do without frameworks?

    Read the article

  • Is W3C Valid XHTML and CSS Code, Semantic and Accessible Mark-up enough for site's SEO?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    I created a web-site for a client with W3C Valid XHTML and CSS Code, Semantic and Accessible Mark-up and I had said to client my code will be SEO friendly. Theyway i code it will be good for your site SEO. I putted my all efforts to make good code Now my non-techie Client is asking me, Should him go for any SEO company even after providing SEO friendly site by me? What other SEO companies will do for him other than what we can't by W3C Valid XHTML, CSS , Semantic and Accessible Mark-up?

    Read the article

  • Is it ok to use <strong> in place of <b> blindly ?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    Note: I know <b> is presentational and <span style="font-weight:bold> is better way and <strong> and <em> for emphasis but my question is not regarding this. Should we convert every <b> to <strong> blindly ? many people do this they think <b> is not good as per web standards so they convert every <b> to <strong> upon site redesign, content re-population, new site design and people suggest this to others also. Dreamweaver has also given option to convert all <b> and <i> to <strong> and <em> on code paste in design view and when we use B and I Which people use blindly. And Dreamweaver(if above option is checked) and many online WYSIWYG editor give output in <strong> and <em> while button shows B and I. In my opinion it's creating misconception about <strong> and <b> When we get content from client we don't know where client want to give emphasize and where he just want to use text bold for presentation purpose.What we should do in this condition? no one has time client and we both to give time to think for each bold text, it should be in <b> or in <strong>, <i> or in <em> What are pros and cons to convert every <b> and <i> into <strong> and <em> blindly if we are saying our site is accessible? Update: remember <b> and <i> are not deprecated there are in HTML 5 specification

    Read the article

  • Does Apple approve a kind of mark-up language for AppStore?

    - by Eonil
    AppStore now rejects applications made with non-Apple like languages. (with modified contract) However, is it allowed using declarative mark-up language formed with XML? (like XHTML, but different schema) The declarative mark-up is a code too, but not a script or logic code. Just a passive, static data, but forms some layout and part of an application logic.

    Read the article

  • What is preferred accessible and semantically correct method to code this type of data design?

    - by jitendra
    What is preferred accessible and semantically correct method to code this type of data design? Table UL, LI DIV,SPAN For icons should i use for each place or i should is icon from CSS sprites? If we use css sprite here then how to code, and what will happen when images will be disabled ? Every link will open in new window and I have to indicate about file size also for both sighted and blind users? So what is the best method to make this design and what is best method to show icon and to indicate all type of users that file will open in new window and what is file size? Content of table should be accessible and understandable in as good as possible manner in all conditions For sighted user even if images are disabled for screen user for text browser user and if css is disabled And What is the role of Filenames of PDF, video, audio here?

    Read the article

  • Comprehending the Semantic web and it's methods, syntax, vocabularies and languages

    - by DreamCodeR
    Hi. I have just been introduced to the semantic web and it's family of functions but I have a hard time understanding some of it, which I was hoping someone could explain to me. As far as I've understood, RDF can be written in several syntaxes. RDF/XML, Turtle, etc. Now, I understand XML. How it is presented and how it can be parsed. However, some people write in the turtle syntax, but how do they parse that information? I can't seem to find a single library for any language to "extract" the information written in a turtle syntax into another form. The same goes for N3. How can it be used? Executed or else? I seem to be able to understand RDFa. That it is a way to implement RDF into XHTML. For me that is a way to implement RDF into "something". But how can I compare that to turtle, N3, or the like? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Do you know best site on Net to learn XHTML 1.0 strict , Like other than W3schools.com but with bett

    - by metal-gear-solid
    Do you know best site on Net to learn XHTML , Like other than W3schools.com but with better and latest content? I have to link some friends who want to learn HTML? I like the "Try it editor" of W3C schools but not the content. I need semantic discussion also. what is the element all about and what is the semantic value, even if's it's valid, should we use or not. etc Is there any other site focused on Semantic , accessible and Valid XHTML with good content with "try it editor" like w3c schools? or now i should suggest to someone to learn HTML 5 Directly?

    Read the article

  • What is the second best possible way to make this content box round corner (without border-radius)?

    - by jitendra
    Is it possible to make this box's corner round with same html tags. without using any other tag and border-radius property. but i can use css classes and background images. and box height should be depend on content of <p>grr</p> <h2>Nulla Facilisi</h2> <p> Phasellus at turpis lacus. Nulla hendrerit lobortis nibh. In lectus erat, blandit non feugiat vel, accumsan ac dolor. Etiam et ligula vel tortor tempus vehicula porttitor ut ligula. Mauris felis odio, fermentum vel </p> Edit : What is the best possible way to achieve this without css border-radius property which is not supported by internet explorer?

    Read the article

  • Should we include period "." in link text?

    - by jitendra
    If there is a link at last of the paragraph or in a middle of paragraph and just before the period . then should we include . period in link text or not. which is ok , this <p> Lorem ipsum dolor oerisque tortor. Morbi quam massa, dictum eget vehicula sed, ullamcorper vel nulla. Fusce feugiat sapien a mauris semper hendrerit <a href="#">ac vel est</a>. </p> or this <p> Lorem ipsum dolor oerisque tortor. Morbi quam massa, dictum eget vehicula sed, ullamcorper vel nulla. Fusce feugiat sapien a mauris semper hendrerit <a href="#">ac vel est.</a> </p> and which would be good for screen reader?

    Read the article

  • Is it possble to make this content box round corner?

    - by jitendra
    Is it possible to make this box's corner round with same html tags. without using any other tag. but i can use css classes. and box height should be depend on content of <p>grr</p> <h2>Nulla Facilisi</h2> <p> Phasellus at turpis lacus. Nulla hendrerit lobortis nibh. In lectus erat, blandit non feugiat vel, accumsan ac dolor. Etiam et ligula vel tortor tempus vehicula porttitor ut ligula. Mauris felis odio, fermentum vel </p>

    Read the article

  • are these css classes names good?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    See section /* Common Classes */ of this page. http://webdesign.about.com/od/css/a/master_stylesht_2.htm are these css classes good, to use in any project? in terms of semantic? /* Common Classes */ .clear { clear: both; } .floatLeft { float: left; } .floatRight { float: right; } .textLeft { text-align: left; } .textRight { text-align: right; } .textCenter { text-align: center; } .textJustify { text-align: justify; } .blockCenter { display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; } /* remember to set width */ .bold { font-weight: bold; } .italic { font-style: italic; } .underline { text-decoration: underline; } .noindent { margin-left: 0; padding-left: 0; } .nomargin { margin: 0; } .nopadding { padding: 0; } .nobullet { list-style: none; list-style-image: none; }

    Read the article

  • How to make columns as wide as the widest entry?

    - by Helper Method
    For a gcc cheatsheet I'm writing, I want to create a table which should describe how gcc interprets different file endings. The table I created so far is defined as follows: |====================================================================== |.c |C source code which must be preprocessed. |.i |C source code which should not be preprocessed. |.h |C header file to be turned into a precompiled header. |.s |Assembler code. |other | An object file to be fed straight into linking. Any file name with no recognized suffix is treated this way. |====================================================================== The problem I have is that the table spans the total page width, but what I want is that each column only is as wide as it's widest entry, and that the table will span only as much witdh as it needs.

    Read the article

  • What is the benefit to add W3C logo in site?

    - by jitendra
    http://www.w3.org/QA/Tools/Icons If my code is valid then Should i add logo to all my personal and client sites.? Should i add logo to client sites and tell to client these are good to have? If code is valid but semantically correct even can we use logo? What is benefit and purpose to add these logos for XHTML, CSS accessibility. And what is the difference between Gold and Blue logo Why W3C provide these logos?

    Read the article

  • What is the appropriate HTML 5 element for a hero unit/showcase?

    - by deb
    A lot of marketing and content-heavy sites showcase the page's primary content using large text and/or images, sometimes with a slider, containing a call to action for signing up for a service, or downloading an app, etc.. I'm not sure what this design element is called, I got the term hero unit from twitter bootstrap: http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/components.html#typography I think most of you know what I'm trying to describe... If it's not clear I can add screenshots or links to this question. I looked at a few different sites, and some put this hero unit inside a ASIDE element, others use SECTION, ARTICLE and even HEADER. Using twitter bootstrap as an example again: <header class="jumbotron masthead"> <div class="inner"> <h1>Bootstrap, from Twitter</h1> <p>Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and Javascript for popular user interface components and interactions.</p> <p class="download-info"> Is HEADER the most appropriate tag for this type of content? Or should I use ASIDE, ARTICLE or SECTION?

    Read the article

  • When to use <strong> and when to use <b>?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    When to use <strong> and when to use <b> or other ways to give look of bold? strong has semantic value ( and useful for screen reader while b is presentation (and even valid in HTML 5). my question is not what is the difference between strong and b. The question is when to use semantic tag and when to use just to make text bold Should I always use <strong> if client's content files (MS word files) has some words bold in content paragraphs? How can we know when client want to give emphasis to text and when he just want to make text bold for presentation/aesthetic purpose? If it's client job to tell us, then how to explain this scenario to client to give us clear info on "when he just want to make text bold for presentation/aesthetic purpose" ?

    Read the article

  • Help needed to align controls in a webpage

    - by Retrocoder
    I’m not too familiar with webpage design and am having a problem. I have the following datalist which is displayed ok but it is the section near the bottom that I am having with. I want the Hyperlink image to be on the same line as the “Details” text. Unfortunately the text appears below the Hyperlink control. Is there an easy fix to get what I want ? Should I be using the “div” mark-up instead of and ? <asp:DataList ID="dgDownloads" Width="100%" runat="server" EnableViewState="false" > <ItemTemplate> <tr> <td> <h3 class="mast3"><%# DataBinder.Eval (Container.DataItem, "Alias", "Reported by : {0}")%></h3> </td> <td> <h3 class="mast3"><%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "CreationDate", "Reported on : {0:dd/MM/yyyy}")%></h3> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <h3 class="mast6"><%# ((System.Data.IDataRecord) Container.DataItem)["Heading"] %></h3> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <asp:HyperLink CssClass="buttonStyle" ImageUrl="../images/bg/download.png" runat="server" NavigateUrl='<%#((System.Data.IDataRecord) Container.DataItem)["FileURL"] %>' /> <%# ((System.Data.IDataRecord) Container.DataItem)["Details"] %><ln/><br/><br/> </td> </tr> </ItemTemplate> </asp:DataList>

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29  | Next Page >