Search Results

Search found 3493 results on 140 pages for 'constructor'.

Page 24/140 | < Previous Page | 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31  | Next Page >

  • C++ LNK2019 error with constructors and destructors in derived classes

    - by BLH
    I have two classes, one inherited from the other. When I compile, I get the following errors: 1Entity.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "public: __thiscall Utility::Parsables::Base::Base(void)" (??0Base@Parsables@Utility@@QAE@XZ) referenced in function "public: __thiscall Utility::Parsables::Entity::Entity(void)" (??0Entity@Parsables@Utility@@QAE@XZ) 1Entity.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "public: virtual __thiscall Utility::Parsables::Base::~Base(void)" (??1Base@Parsables@Utility@@UAE@XZ) referenced in function "public: virtual __thiscall Utility::Parsables::Entity::~Entity(void)" (??1Entity@Parsables@Utility@@UAE@XZ) 1D:\Programming\Projects\Caffeine\Debug\Caffeine.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 2 unresolved externals I really can't figure out what's going on.. can anyone see what I'm doing wrong? I'm using Visual C++ Express 2008. Here are the files.. "include/Utility/Parsables/Base.hpp" #ifndef CAFFEINE_UTILITY_PARSABLES_BASE_HPP #define CAFFEINE_UTILITY_PARSABLES_BASE_HPP namespace Utility { namespace Parsables { class Base { public: Base( void ); virtual ~Base( void ); }; } } #endif //CAFFEINE_UTILITY_PARSABLES_BASE_HPP "src/Utility/Parsables/Base.cpp" #include "Utility/Parsables/Base.hpp" namespace Utility { namespace Parsables { Base::Base( void ) { } Base::~Base( void ) { } } } "include/Utility/Parsables/Entity.hpp" #ifndef CAFFEINE_UTILITY_PARSABLES_ENTITY_HPP #define CAFFEINE_UTILITY_PARSABLES_ENTITY_HPP #include "Utility/Parsables/Base.hpp" namespace Utility { namespace Parsables { class Entity : public Base { public: Entity( void ); virtual ~Entity( void ); }; } } #endif //CAFFEINE_UTILITY_PARSABLES_ENTITY_HPP "src/Utility/Parsables/Entity.cpp" #include "Utility/Parsables/Entity.hpp" namespace Utility { namespace Parsables { Entity::Entity( void ) { } Entity::~Entity( void ) { } } }

    Read the article

  • std::string x(x);

    - by FredOverflow
    std::string x(x); This crashes very badly on my compiler. Does this mean I should test for this != &that in my own copy constructors, or can I assume that no client will ever be so stupid?

    Read the article

  • VB Classes Best Practice - give all properties values?

    - by Becky Franklin
    Sorry if this is a bit random, but is it good practice to give all fields of a class a value when the class is instanciated? I'm just wondering if its better practice to have a constuctor that takes no parameters and gives all the fields default values, or whether fields that have values should be assigned and others left alone until required? I hope that makes sense, Becky

    Read the article

  • BLL returning the right Type of an instance

    - by Younes
    I have a class "Artikel" and there i write some Business Logic. I also have a class "tArtikel" which is a type. In my class "Artikel" I work with "tArtikel" and returns are of that type. Now when i instantiate an "Artikel" i want it to be of type "tArtikel", so what i tried in my code is: public tArtikel Artikel() { tArtikel artikel = new tArtikel(); } Which results in: "'Artikel' member names cannot be the same as their enclosing type". How would i set this up correctly?

    Read the article

  • ArgumentError: Error #1063: Argument count mismatch on com.flashden::MenuItem(). Expected 1, got 0.

    - by Suzanne
    I keep getting the below error only in firefox ArgumentError: Error #1063: Argument count mismatch on com.flashden::MenuItem(). Expected 1, got 0. at flash.display::Sprite/constructChildren() at flash.display::Sprite() at flash.display::MovieClip() at com.flashden::Preview() Below is my menu script: package com.flashden { import flash.display.MovieClip; import flash.text.; import flash.events.MouseEvent; import flash.events.; import flash.net.URLRequest; import flash.display.Loader; public class MenuItem extends MovieClip { private var scope; public var closedX :Number public static const OPEN_MENU = "openMenu"; function callLink(event:MouseEvent):void { public function MenuItem(scope) { // set scope to talk back to -------------------------------// this.scope = scope; // disable all items not to be clickable -------------------// txt_label.mouseEnabled = false; menuItemShine.mouseEnabled = false; menuItemArrow.mouseEnabled = false; // make background clip the item to be clicked (button) ----// menuItemBG.buttonMode = true; // add click event listener to the header background -------// menuItemBG.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, clickHandler); } private function clickHandler (e:MouseEvent) { scope.openMenuItem(this); } public function loadContent (contentURL:String) { var loader:Loader = new Loader(); configureListeners(loader.contentLoaderInfo); var request:URLRequest = new URLRequest(contentURL); loader.load(request); // place x position of content at the bottom of the header so the top is not cut off ----// loader.x = 35; // we add the content at level 1, because the background clip is at level 0 ----// addChildAt(loader, 0); } private function configureListeners(dispatcher:IEventDispatcher):void { dispatcher.addEventListener(Event.COMPLETE, completeHandler); dispatcher.addEventListener(HTTPStatusEvent.HTTP_STATUS, httpStatusHandler); dispatcher.addEventListener(Event.INIT, initHandler); dispatcher.addEventListener(IOErrorEvent.IO_ERROR, ioErrorHandler); dispatcher.addEventListener(Event.OPEN, openHandler); dispatcher.addEventListener(ProgressEvent.PROGRESS, progressHandler); dispatcher.addEventListener(Event.UNLOAD, unLoadHandler); } private function completeHandler(event:Event):void { //trace("completeHandler: " + event); // remove loader animation ----------------// removeChild(getChildByName("mc_preloader")); } private function httpStatusHandler(event:HTTPStatusEvent):void { // trace("httpStatusHandler: " + event); } private function initHandler(event:Event):void { //trace("initHandler: " + event); } private function ioErrorHandler(event:IOErrorEvent):void { //trace("ioErrorHandler: " + event); } private function openHandler(event:Event):void { //trace("openHandler: " + event); } private function progressHandler(event:ProgressEvent):void { //trace("progressHandler: bytesLoaded=" + event.bytesLoaded + " bytesTotal=" + event.bytesTotal); } private function unLoadHandler(event:Event):void { //trace("unLoadHandler: " + event); } } } Any idea why this is happening?

    Read the article

  • C++ Templates: implicit conversion, no matching function for call to ctor

    - by noname
    template<class T> class test { public: test() { } test(T& e) { } }; int main() { test<double> d(4.3); return 0; } Compiled using g++ 4.4.1 with the following errors: g++ test.cpp -Wall -o test.exe test.cpp: In function 'int main()': test.cpp:18: error: no matching function for call to 'test<double>::test(double) ' test.cpp:9: note: candidates are: test<T>::test(T&) [with T = double] test.cpp:5: note: test<T>::test() [with T = double] test.cpp:3: note: test<double>::test(const test<double>&) make: *** [test.exe] Error 1 However, this works: double a=1.1; test<double> d(a); Why is this happing? Is it possible that g++ cannot implicitly convert literal expression 1.1 to double? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Ctor not allowed return type.

    - by atch
    Having code: struct B { int* a; B(int value):a(new int(value)) { } B():a(nullptr){} B(const B&); } B::B(const B& pattern) { } I'm getting err msg: 'Error 1 error C2533: 'B::{ctor}' : constructors not allowed a return type' Any idea why? P.S. I'm using VS 2010RC

    Read the article

  • Incorrect new Uri(base, relative) behaviour in .NET

    - by dr. evil
    When you create a new Uri like this: New Uri(New Uri("http://example.com/test.php"),"?x=y") it returns: http://example.com/?x=y It was supposed to return: http://example.com/test.php?x=y according to the every major browser out there (I'm not quite sure what RFC says though). Is this is a bug or is there any other function out there which behaves correctly, also what's the best way to fix it without reinventing the wheel?

    Read the article

  • How to use a separate class to validate credit card numbers in C#

    - by EvanRyan
    I have set up a class to validate credit card numbers. The credit card type and number are selected on a form in a separate class. I'm trying to figure out how to get the credit card type and number that are selected in the other class (frmPayment) in to my credit card class algorithm: public enum CardType { MasterCard, Visa, AmericanExpress } public sealed class CardValidator { public static string SelectedCardType { get; private set; } public static string CardNumber { get; private set; } private CardValidator(string selectedCardType, string cardNumber) { SelectedCardType = selectedCardType; CardNumber = cardNumber; } public static bool Validate(CardType cardType, string cardNumber) { byte[] number = new byte[16]; int length = 0; for (int i = 0; i < cardNumber.Length; i++) { if (char.IsDigit(cardNumber, i)) { if (length == 16) return false; number[length++] = byte.Parse(cardNumber[i]); //not working. find different way to parse } } switch(cardType) { case CardType.MasterCard: if(length != 16) return false; if(number[0] != 5 || number[1] == 0 || number[1] > 5) return false; break; case CardType.Visa: if(length != 16 & length != 13) return false; if(number[0] != 4) return false; break; case CardType.AmericanExpress: if(length != 15) return false; if(number[0] != 3 || (number[1] != 4 & number[1] != 7)) return false; break; } // Use Luhn Algorithm to validate int sum = 0; for(int i = length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if(i % 2 == length % 2) { int n = number[i] * 2; sum += (n / 10) + (n % 10); } else sum += number[i]; } return (sum % 10 == 0); } }

    Read the article

  • Shallow Copy in Java

    - by Vilius
    Hello there! I already know, what a shallow copy is, but I'm not able to impliment it. Here's a short example. public class Shallow { String name; int number; public Shallow (String name, int number) { this.name = name; this.number = number; } } Test the implementation ... public class ShallowTest { public static void main (String[] args) { Shallow shallow = new Shallow("Shallow", 123); Shallow shallowClone = new Shallow(shallow); shallowClone.name = 'Peter'; shallowClone.number = 321; System.out.println(shallow.name + " - " + shallow.number); } } As I purpose, just the reference of the non primitive datatype String would be copied, so that by calling "shallowClone.name = 'Peter';" I would also change the name of "shallow". Am I right? But somehow, it just does not want to work ....

    Read the article

  • Why Java interfaces can't have constructors?

    - by AndrejaKo
    This question showed up on my mid-term exams and I've been searching for correct answer for some time. I know that Java interfaces can't be directly instantiated so they don't need constructors and that they can have only public static final attributes so they don't need constructors to set them up but that's not the expected answer.

    Read the article

  • Is it undefined behavior in the case of the private functions call in the initializer list?

    - by Alexey Malistov
    Consider the following code: struct Calc { Calc(const Arg1 & arg1, const Arg2 & arg2, /* */ const ArgN & argn) : arg1(arg1), arg2(arg2), /* */ argn(argn), coef1(get_coef1()), coef2(get_coef2()) { } int Calc1(); int Calc2(); int Calc3(); private: const Arg1 & arg1; const Arg2 & arg2; // ... const ArgN & argn; const int coef1; // I want to use const because const int coef2; // no modification is needed. int get_coef1() const { // calc coef1 using arg1, arg2, ..., argn; // undefined behavior? } int get_coef2() const { // calc coef2 using arg1, arg2, ..., argn and coef1; // undefined behavior? } }; struct Calc is not completely defined when I call get_coef1 and get_coef2 Is this code valid? Can I get UB?

    Read the article

  • prevent using functions before initialization, constructors-like in C

    - by Hernán Eche
    This is the way I get to prevent funA,funB,funC, etc.. for being used before init #define INIT_KEY 0xC0DE //any number except 0, is ok static int initialized=0; int Init() { //many init task initialized=INIT_KEY; } int funA() { if (initialized!=INIT_KEY) return 1 //.. } int funB() { if (initialized!=INIT_KEY) return 1 //.. } int funC() { if (initialized!=INIT_KEY) return 1 //.. } The problem with this approach is that if some of those function is called within a loop so "if (initialized!=INIT_KEY)" is called again, and again, although it's not necessary. It's a good example of why constructors are useful haha, If it were an object I would be sure that when was created initialization was called, but in C, I don't know how to do it. Any other ideas are welcome!

    Read the article

  • +(void) initialize in objecive c class static variables construstor

    - by sugar
    I found some sample code from here. static UIImage *backgroundImageDepressed; /** * */ @implementation DecimalPointButton + (void) initialize { backgroundImageDepressed = [[UIImage imageNamed:@"decimalKeyDownBackground.png"] retain]; } is it something like this - +(void) initialize method initialize static variables of a class ( interface ) in objective c ? I have never seen this before. Please need your guidance on it. Thanks in advance for sharing your great knowledge. Sagar

    Read the article

  • Forcing a templated object to construct from a pointer

    - by SalamiArmi
    I have a fictional class: template<typename T> class demonstration { public: demonstration(){} ... T *m_data; } At some point in the program's execution, I want to set m_data to a big block of allocated memory and construct an object T there. At the moment, I've been using this code: void construct() { *m_data = T(); } Which I've now realised is probably not the best idea... wont work under certain cirumstances, if T has a private assignment operator for example. Is there a normal/better way to do what I'm attempting here?

    Read the article

  • Is the old vector get cleared? If yes, how and when?

    - by user180866
    I have the following code: void foo() { vector<double> v(100,1); // line 1 // some code v = vector<double>(200,2); // line 2 // some code } what happened to the vector of size 100 after the second line? Is it gets cleared by itself? If the answer is yes, how and when it is cleared? By the way, is there any other "easy and clean" ways to change the vector as in line 2? I don't want things like v.resize(200); for (int i=0; i<200; i++) v[i] = 2;

    Read the article

  • How to differentiate two constructors with the same parameters?

    - by cibercitizen1
    Suppose we want two constructors for a class representing complex numbers: Complex (double re, double img) // construct from cartesian coordinates Complex (double A, double w) // construct from polar coordinates but the parameters (number and type) are the same: what is the more elegant way to identify what is intended? Adding a third parameter to one of the constructors?

    Read the article

  • C++: Copy contructor: Use Getters or access member vars directly?

    - by cbrulak
    Have a simple container class: public Container { public: Container() {} Container(const Container& cont) //option 1 { SetMyString(cont.GetMyString()); } //OR Container(const Container& cont) //option 2 { m_str1 = cont.m_str1; } public string GetMyString() { return m_str1;} public void SetMyString(string str) { m_str1 = str;} private: string m_str1; } So, would you recommend this method or accessing the member variables directly? In the example, all code is inline, but in our real code there is no inline code. Update (29 Sept 09): Some of these answers are well written however they seem to get missing the point of this question: this is simple contrived example to discuss using getters/setters vs variables initializer lists or private validator functions are not really part of this question. I'm wondering if either design will make the code easier to maintain and expand. Some ppl are focusing on the string in this example however it is just an example, imagine it is a different object instead. I'm not concerned about performance. we're not programming on the PDP-11

    Read the article

  • Pattern for database-wrapper in java

    - by Space_C0wb0y
    I am currently writing a java-class that wraps an SQLite database. This class has two ways to be instantiated: Open an existing database. Create a new database. This is what I cam up with: public class SQLiteDatabaseWrapper { public static SQLiteDatabaseWrapper openExisting(File PathToDB) { return new SQLiteDatabaseWrapper(PathToDB); } public static SQLiteDatabaseWrapper createNew(File PathToDB) { CreateAndInitializeNewDatabase(PathToDB); return new SQLiteDatabaseWrapper(PathToDB); } private SQLiteDatabaseWrapper(File PathToDB) { // Open connection and setup wrapper } } Is this the way to go in Java, or is there any other best practice for this situation?

    Read the article

  • c++/boost: use tuple ctors when subclassing

    - by bbb
    Hi there, is there some way to use a boost tuple's ctors as an addition to the subclass methods (and ctors) like here? // typedef boost::tuple<int, SomeId, SomeStatus> Conn; // Conn(1); // works and initializes using default ctors of Some* struct Conn : boost::tuple<int, AsynchId, AccDevRetStatus> {}; Conn(1); // "no matching function call" (but i want it so much) T.H.X.

    Read the article

  • copy C'tor with operator= | C++

    - by user2266935
    I've got this code here: class DerivedClass : public BaseClass { SomeClass* a1; Someclass* a2; public: //constructors go here ~DerivedClass() { delete a1; delete a2;} // other functions go here .... }; My first question is as follows: Can I write an "operator=" to "DerivedClass" ? (if your answer is yes, could you show me how?) My second question is: If the answer to the above is yes, could you show me how to make an "copy c'tor" using the "operator=" that you wrote beforehand (if that is even possible)? Your help would be much appreciated !

    Read the article

  • Should constant contructor aguments be passed by reference or value?

    - by Mike
    When const values are passed to an object construct should they be passed by reference or value? If you pass by value and the arguments are immediately fed to initializes are two copies being made? Is this something that the compiler will automatically take care of. I have noticed that all textbook examples of constructors and intitializers pass by value but this seems inefficient to me. class Point { public: int x; int y; Point(const int _x, const int _y) : x(_x), y(_y) {} }; int main() { const int a = 1, b = 2; Point p(a,b); Point q(3,5); cout << p.x << "," << p.y << endl; cout << q.x << "," << q.y << endl; } vs. class Point { public: int x; int y; Point(const int& _x, const int& _y) : x(_x), y(_y) {} }; Both compile and do the same thing but which is correct?

    Read the article

  • List with non-null elements ends up containing null. A synchronization issue?

    - by Alix
    Hi. First of all, sorry about the title -- I couldn't figure out one that was short and clear enough. Here's the issue: I have a list List<MyClass> list to which I always add newly-created instances of MyClass, like this: list.Add(new MyClass()). I don't add elements any other way. However, then I iterate over the list with foreach and find that there are some null entries. That is, the following code: foreach (MyClass entry in list) if (entry == null) throw new Exception("null entry!"); will sometimes throw an exception. I should point out that the list.Add(new MyClass()) are performed from different threads running concurrently. The only thing I can think of to account for the null entries is the concurrent accesses. List<> isn't thread-safe, after all. Though I still find it strange that it ends up containing null entries, instead of just not offering any guarantees on ordering. Can you think of any other reason? Also, I don't care in which order the items are added, and I don't want the calling threads to block waiting to add their items. If synchronization is truly the issue, can you recommend a simple way to call the Add method asynchronously, i.e., create a delegate that takes care of that while my thread keeps running its code? I know I can create a delegate for Add and call BeginInvoke on it. Does that seem appropriate? Thanks.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31  | Next Page >