Search Results

Search found 4320 results on 173 pages for 'vertex arrays'.

Page 24/173 | < Previous Page | 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31  | Next Page >

  • Classic asp comparison of comma separated lists

    - by Reiwoldt
    Hello, I have two comma separated lists:- 36,189,47,183,65,50 65,50,189,47 The question is how to compare the two in classic ASP in order to identify and return any values that exist in list 1 but that don't exist in list 2 bearing in mind that associative arrays aren't available. E.g., in the above example I would need the return value to be 36,183 Thanks

    Read the article

  • PHP - JSON Steam API query

    - by Hunter
    First time using "JSON" and I've just been working away at my dissertation and I'm integrating a few features from the steam API.. now I'm a little bit confused as to how to create arrays. function test_steamAPI() { $api = ('http://api.steampowered.com/ISteamUser/GetPlayerSummaries/v0002/?key='.get_Steam_api().'&steamids=76561197960435530'); $test = decode_url($api); var_dump($test['response']['players'][0]['personaname']['steamid']); } //Function to decode and return the data. function decode_url($url) { $decodeURL = $url; $data = file_get_contents($url); $data_output = json_decode($data, true); return $data_output; } So ea I've wrote a simple method to decode Json as I'll be doing a fair bit.. But just wondering the best way to print out arrays.. I can't for the life of me get it to print more than 1 element without it retunring an error e.g. Warning: Illegal string offset 'steamid' in /opt/lampp/htdocs/lan/lan-includes/scripts/class.steam.php on line 48 string(1) "R" So I can print one element, and if I add another it returns errors. EDIT -- Thanks for help, So this was my solution: function test_steamAPI() { $api = ('http://api.steampowered.com/ISteamUser/GetPlayerSummaries/v0002/?key='.get_Steam_api().'&steamids=76561197960435530,76561197960435530'); $data = decode_url($api); foreach($data ['response']['players'] as $player) { echo "Steam id:" . $player['steamid'] . "\n"; echo "Community visibility :" . $player['communityvisibilitystate'] . "\n"; echo "Player profile" . $player['profileurl'] ."\n"; } } //Function to decode and return the data. function decode_url($url) { $decodeURL = $url; $json = file_get_contents($decodeURL); $data_output = json_decode($json, true); return $data_output; } Worked this out by taking a look at the data.. and a couple json examples, this returns an array based on the Steam API URL (It works for multiple queries.... just FYI) and you can insert loops inside for items etc.. (if anyone searches for this).

    Read the article

  • How to loop 3 dimension array using foreach PHP

    - by vzhen
    Below is foreach and the 3 dimension arrays, no problem with the looping but i cannot sepcify which array to echo, they must me the whole arrays like echo $subvalue, any better solutions with looping 3 dimension array? i actually feel weird with this looping. Thanks in adv foreach ($stories as $key => $story){ //echo "<br />"; foreach($story as $subkey => $subvalue){ echo $subvalue."<br />"; foreach($subvalue as $key => $subsubvalue){ echo $subsubvalue."<br />"; } } } Array ( [270] => Array ( [uid] => 36 [user_email] => [email protected] [sid] => 270 [story_name] => Story C [photo_url] => Array ( [0] => story_photos/2012/0322/361332381418153311.jpg [1] => story_photos/2012/0322/361332393792911587.jpg ) [photo_added_date] => Array ( [0] => 1332381418 [1] => 1332393792 ) ) [269] => Array ( [uid] => 36 [user_email] => [email protected] [sid] => 269 [story_name] => Story B [photo_url] => Array ( [0] => story_photos/2012/0322/361332381406580761.jpg ) [photo_added_date] => Array ( [0] => 1332381406 ) ) [268] => Array ( [uid] => 36 [user_email] => [email protected] [sid] => 268 [story_name] => Story A [photo_url] => Array ( [0] => story_photos/2012/0322/361332381393552719.jpg ) [photo_added_date] => Array ( [0] => 1332381393 ) ) )

    Read the article

  • PHP 5 functioning returning an array- interaction without assignment?

    - by Lee
    I'm wondering if this kind of thing will ever be possible in PHP (and whether it already is and I'm just missing something...) <?php function test() { return array( 'id'=>10, 'name'=>'John' ); } echo 'Your name is: '.test()['name']; ?> I'd really like to be able to use returned arrays directly instead of first assigning them to a var... possible?

    Read the article

  • x=["key" => "value"]. How does it work in Ruby?

    - by Earlz
    Ok, so I was comparing some stuff in my own DSL to Ruby. One construct they both support is this x=["key" => "value"] Knowing the difference between arrays and hashes, I would think this to be illegal, but the result in Ruby is [{"key" => "value"}] Why is this? And with this kinda syntax why can't you do x=("key" => "value") Why is an array a special case for implicitly created hashes?

    Read the article

  • (gcc) Multi-Dim Array or Double Pointer for Warning-free Compile

    - by paul simmons
    Hi, I have a function, which is called sometimes with regular, sometimes dynamic arrays. If I define the function as function_name(int[10][10] a) and send int** as a parameter, I get a warning. Opposite, if I declare function_name(int** a) and send int[][] as a parameter (after casting) I cannot access to array elements inside function. What is the correctest way?

    Read the article

  • Is the following array really multidimensional?

    - by flockofcode
    Book I’ learning from claims that intArray has two dimensions. But since calling intArray.GetLength(1) will result in an IndexoutOfRange exception, couldn’t we claim that unlike rectangular arrays, intArray isn’t really multidimensional and thus has only one dimension? int[][] intArray=new int[3][]; thank you

    Read the article

  • Bulk update & occasional insert (coredata) - Too slow

    - by Andrew
    Update: Currently looking into NSSET's minusSet links: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1475636/comparing-two-arrays Hi guys, Could benefit from your wisdom here.. I'm using Coredata in my app, on first launch I download a data file and insert over 500 objects (each with 60 attributes) - fast, no problem. Each subsequent launch I download an updated version of the file, from which I need to update all existing objects' attributes (except maybe 5 attributes) and create new ones for items which have been added to the downloaded file. So, first launch I get 500 objects.. say a week later my file now contains 507 items.. I create two arrays, one for existing and one for downloaded. NSArray *peopleArrayDownloaded = [CoreDataHelper getObjectsFromContext:@"person" :@"person_id" :YES :managedObjectContextPeopleTemp]; NSArray *peopleArrayExisting = [CoreDataHelper getObjectsFromContext:@"person" :@"person_id" :YES :managedObjectContextPeople]; If the count of each array is equal then I just do this: NSUInteger index = 0; if ([peopleArrayExisting count] == [peopleArrayDownloaded count]) { NSLog(@"Number of people downloaded is same as the number of people existing"); for (person *existingPerson in peopleArrayExisting) { person *tempPerson = [peopleArrayDownloaded objectAtIndex:index]; // NSLog(@"Updating id: %@ with id: %@",existingPerson.person_id,tempPerson.person_id); // I have 60 attributes which I to update on each object, is there a quicker way other than overwriting existing? index++; } } else { NSLog(@"Number of people downloaded is different to number of players existing"); So now comes the slow part. I end up using this (which is tooooo slow): NSLog(@"Need people added to the league"); for (person *tempPerson in peopeArrayDownloaded) { NSPredicate *predicate = [NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:@"person_id = %@",tempPerson.person_id]; // NSLog(@"Searching for existing person, person_id: %@",existingPerson.person_id); NSArray *filteredArray = [peopleArrayExisting filteredArrayUsingPredicate:predicate]; if ([filteredArray count] == 0) { NSLog(@"Couldn't find an existing person in the downloaded file. Adding.."); person *newPerson = [NSEntityDescription insertNewObjectForEntityForName:@"person" inManagedObjectContext:managedObjectContextPeople]; Is there a way to generate a new array of index items referring to the additional items in my downloaded file? Incidentally, on my tableViews I'm using NSFetchedResultsController so updating attributes will call [cell setNeedsDisplay]; .. about 60 times per cell, not a good thing and it can crash the app. Thanks for reading :)

    Read the article

  • classic asp comparison of comma seperated lists

    - by Reiwoldt
    Hello, I have two comma seperated lists:- 36,189,47,183,65,50 65, 50, 189, 47 the question is how to compare the two in classic ASP in order to identify and return any values that exist in list 1 but that don't exist in list 2 bearing in mind that associative arrays aren't available. e.g. in the above example I would need the return value to be 36,183 Thanks

    Read the article

  • Array returning Null values

    - by Nick Gibson
    Dunno why it is...heres the coding for it. http://pastebin.org/301343 I know theres a lot of repetitiveness in the coding...but its because the arrays were retuning null so I got tired of messing with them. Everything works until it reaches line 224, which returns null values.

    Read the article

  • What is the best approach in SQL to store multi-level descriptions?

    - by gime
    I need a new perspective on how to design a reliable and efficient SQL database to store multi-level arrays of data. This problem applies to many situations but I came up with this example: There are hundreds of products. Each product has an undefined number of parts. Each part is built from several elements. All products are described in the same way. All parts would require the same fields to describe them (let's say: price, weight, part name), all elements of all parts also have uniform design (for example: element code, manufacturer). Plain and simple. One element may be related to only part, and each part is related to one product only. I came up with idea of three tables: Products: -------------------------------------------- prod_id prod_name prod_price prod_desc 1 hoover 120 unused next Parts: ---------------------------------------------------- part_id part_name part_price part_weight prod_id 3 engine 10 20 1 and finally Elements: --------------------------------------- el_id el_code el_manufacturer part_id 1 BFG12 GE 3 Now, select a desired product, select all from PARTS where prod_id is the same, and then select all from ELEMENTS where part_id matches - after multiple queries you've got all data. I'm just not sure if this is the right approach. I've got also another idea, without ELEMENTS table. That would decrease queries but I'm a bit afraid it might be lame and bad practice. Instead of ELEMENTS table there are two more fields in the PARTS table, so it looks like this: part_id, part_name, part_price, part_weight, prod_id, part_el_code, part_el_manufacturer they would be text type, and for each part, information about elements would be stored as strings, this way: part_el_code | code_of_element1; code_of_element2; code_of_element3 part_el_manufacturer | manuf_of_element1; manuf_of_element2; manuf_of_element3 Then all we need is to explode() data from those fields, and we get arrays, easy to display. Of course this is not perfect and has some limitations, but is this idea ok? Or should I just go with the first idea? Or maybe there is a better approach to this problem? It's really hard to describe it in few words, and that means it's hard to search for answer. Also, understanding the principles of designing databases is not that easy as it seems.

    Read the article

  • Sum Values in Multidimensional Array

    - by lemonpole
    Hello all. I'm experimenting with arrays in PHP and I am setting up a fake environment where a "team's" record is held in arrays. $t1 = array ( "basicInfo" => array ( "The Sineps", "December 25, 2010", "lemonpole" ), "overallRecord" => array ( 0, 0, 0, 0 ), "overallSeasons" => array ( "season1.cs" => array (0, 0, 0), "season2.cs" => array (0, 0, 0) ), "matches" => array ( "season1.cs" => array ( "week1" => array ("12", "3", "1"), "week2" => array ("8", "8" ,"0"), "week3" => array ("8", "8" ,"0") ), "season2.cs" => array ( "week1" => array ("9", "2", "5"), "week2" => array ("12", "2" ,"2") ) ) ); What I am trying to achieve is to add all the wins, loss, and draws, from each season's week to their respective week. So for example, the sum of all the weeks in $t1["matches"]["season1.cs"] will be added to $t1["overallSeasons"]["season1.cs"]. The result would leave: "overallSeasons" => array ( "season1.cs" => array (28, 19, 1), "season2.cs" => array (21, 4, 7) ), I tried to work this out on my own for the past hour and all I have gotten is a little more knowledge of for-loops and foreach-loops :o... so I think I now have the basics down such as using foreach loops and so on; however, I am still fairly new to this so bear with me! I can get the loop to point to $t1["matches"] key and go through each season but I can't seem to figure out how to add all of the wins, loss, and draw, for each individual week. For now, I'm only looking for answers concerning the overall seasons sum since I can work from there once I figure out how to achieve this. Any help will be much appreciated but please, try and keep it simple for me... or comment the code accordingly please! Thanks!

    Read the article

  • ActionScript Defining a Static Constant Array

    - by TheDarkIn1978
    is it not possible to define a static const array? i would like to have an optional parameter to a function that is an array of colors, private static const DEFAULT_COLORS:Array = new Array(0x000000, 0xFFFFFF); public function myConstructor(colorsArray:Array = DEFAULT_COLORS) { } i know i can use ...args but i actually wanting to supply the constructor with 2 separate arrays as option arguments.

    Read the article

  • Android java assigning 2d array to 3d array

    - by semajhan
    I'm running into problems trying to assign a 2d array to a 3d array, so I thought i'd ask a question about 3d and 2d arrays. Say I have a masterArray[][][] and wanted to put childArray1[][] and childArray2[][] into it. This is how I have done it and was wondering if that is the correct way of applying it: private int[][][] masterArray; private int[][] childArray1 = { {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1}, {1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1}, {1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1}, {1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1}, {1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1}, {1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1}, {1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 8, 1, 0, 1}, {1, 0, 7, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1}, {1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1}, {1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1}, {1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9, 0, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1} }; private int[][] childArray2 = { {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 7, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 9, 1, 1, 8, 0, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, {1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, }; Ok, so in my init method I use these some methods to set the child arrays into the master array. What I was curious about was how this exactly works. I assumed the following: masterLevel = new int[MAX_LEVELS][MAP_WIDTH][MAP_HEIGHT]; for (int x = 0; x < MAP_WIDTH; x++) { for (int y = 0; y < MAP_HEIGHT; y++) { masterArray[currentLevel][x][y] = childArray1[x][y]; } } Would that work? In my application things aren't working so I picking out code that I am not 100% sure on.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31  | Next Page >