Search Results

Search found 2076 results on 84 pages for 'as keyword'.

Page 25/84 | < Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  | Next Page >

  • How to Build a Website

    I am an affiliate marketer. So when I first build a website, I will build it around a topic and not around the product. I'll take the primary keyword and make that my domain name. I do this so that my website will rank well in the search engines. Then I go about selecting categories from the next keyword phrases down.

    Read the article

  • SEO Marketing With Keywords

    When I begin my SEO marketing campaign, keyword research is very important. This is how I'll set up my keyword campaign. I'll start out with 50 terms to use. Then I'll look at the search volume to see what kind of traffic I can generate to my web site.

    Read the article

  • Will KeywordSpy Really Save You Time?

    Trying to find the best keywords for your projects has proven to be one of the most tedious chores related to Internet marketing. The object of the keyword is to make sure that people who are searching your product will stay on track. These are what allow people to come across your website. If you do not have much free time and are too busy, locating the right keyword can be a difficult as well as time consuming task.

    Read the article

  • Why You Should Start Researching Keywords Weekly

    Keyword research is very important when it comes to SEO, you need to find good keywords, which you are able to easily rank for, keywords which are going to bring in traffic to your website, after all what would be the point in having a website, if nobody saw it? To start with, keyword research can seem very hard to do, but it's really easy when you start to get the hang of it, with every project you have, every website, you need to have a list of keywords, these are the keywords your going to want to rank...

    Read the article

  • Buying a New Domain

    It is important to get good keyword rich domain names. And therefore, as always, keyword research is the most important part of this process.

    Read the article

  • SEO is Still the Key to Your Internet Marketing Success

    After many years, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) is still the key to creating long term brand awareness, online visibility and attracting increased traffic to your website, enabling you to appear higher in the organic search rankings for a set of targeted, high value keyword phrases. SEO is a set of activities that will provide your website with higher Relevance and Authority, which the search engines use to determine how high your website should rank when a specific keyword phrase is searched for.

    Read the article

  • 3 Basic Tips to Research Keywords For SEO Campaign

    As far as the search engine optimization (SEO) on-page factors are concerned, keyword research is the first and important factor for the success of any SEO campaigns. Now let's discuss the three basics to research and shortlist an effective keyword list for a SEO campaign.

    Read the article

  • Search Engine Optimization - 3 Tips For Building Quality Backlinks

    When most people think of Search Engine Optimization (SEO), they usually concentrate solely on keyword optimization. While keyword optimization is very important, it is not the only thing that will make your website or blog search engine friendly. There are other factors that can greatly determine the effectiveness of your site. One of those factors that we'll be discussing today is inbound links, otherwise known as back links.

    Read the article

  • Key Aspects of Successful Search Engine Optimization

    The term Search Engine Optimization refers to the process of using keywords and keyword phrases to get high rankings in web search results. To properly market a website online, there are a number of measures that have to be put in place regarding website content, website layout, keyword choices and general marketing strategies.

    Read the article

  • Search Engine Optimization - All You Need to Know About SEO and Why You Need It?

    'Search Engine Optimization' (SEO), in itself is a self explanatory statement, it is more than just keywords. The word 'optimize' means to make the best or most effective use of the available resource or a situation. SEO is the process which helps in the improvement of the traffic caused to the web site from various search engines. The basic concept of SEO is to choose targeted keyword phrases related to a site, and ensuring that the site places well, when those keyword phrases are part of a Web search.

    Read the article

  • How I Use Emotional Keywords and Why it Works!

    A very important part of our marketing work is finding good keywords. The main criteria when choosing a keyword (apart from the good ratio between searches and results) is that we want the people to type that keyword to be in the end of their purchase cycle, looking to "take action" now and not just to "find some info".

    Read the article

  • The Search Engine Optimization Method

    Ever wondered how to entirely dominate on Google, Yahoo Search and Bing (formerly MSN Search) on your Primary Keyword? Most web owners don't go beyond the obvious. They get unique content, put Meta tags and submit their site to be crawled by search engines. What web owners forget is that there are competitors who are doing the same thing for the same keyword.

    Read the article

  • JavaScript Class Patterns

    - by Liam McLennan
    To write object-oriented programs we need objects, and likely lots of them. JavaScript makes it easy to create objects: var liam = { name: "Liam", age: Number.MAX_VALUE }; But JavaScript does not provide an easy way to create similar objects. Most object-oriented languages include the idea of a class, which is a template for creating objects of the same type. From one class many similar objects can be instantiated. Many patterns have been proposed to address the absence of a class concept in JavaScript. This post will compare and contrast the most significant of them. Simple Constructor Functions Classes may be missing but JavaScript does support special constructor functions. By prefixing a call to a constructor function with the ‘new’ keyword we can tell the JavaScript runtime that we want the function to behave like a constructor and instantiate a new object containing the members defined by that function. Within a constructor function the ‘this’ keyword references the new object being created -  so a basic constructor function might be: function Person(name, age) { this.name = name; this.age = age; this.toString = function() { return this.name + " is " + age + " years old."; }; } var john = new Person("John Galt", 50); console.log(john.toString()); Note that by convention the name of a constructor function is always written in Pascal Case (the first letter of each word is capital). This is to distinguish between constructor functions and other functions. It is important that constructor functions be called with the ‘new’ keyword and that not constructor functions are not. There are two problems with the pattern constructor function pattern shown above: It makes inheritance difficult The toString() function is redefined for each new object created by the Person constructor. This is sub-optimal because the function should be shared between all of the instances of the Person type. Constructor Functions with a Prototype JavaScript functions have a special property called prototype. When an object is created by calling a JavaScript constructor all of the properties of the constructor’s prototype become available to the new object. In this way many Person objects can be created that can access the same prototype. An improved version of the above example can be written: function Person(name, age) { this.name = name; this.age = age; } Person.prototype = { toString: function() { return this.name + " is " + this.age + " years old."; } }; var john = new Person("John Galt", 50); console.log(john.toString()); In this version a single instance of the toString() function will now be shared between all Person objects. Private Members The short version is: there aren’t any. If a variable is defined, with the var keyword, within the constructor function then its scope is that function. Other functions defined within the constructor function will be able to access the private variable, but anything defined outside the constructor (such as functions on the prototype property) won’t have access to the private variable. Any variables defined on the constructor are automatically public. Some people solve this problem by prefixing properties with an underscore and then not calling those properties by convention. function Person(name, age) { this.name = name; this.age = age; } Person.prototype = { _getName: function() { return this.name; }, toString: function() { return this._getName() + " is " + this.age + " years old."; } }; var john = new Person("John Galt", 50); console.log(john.toString()); Note that the _getName() function is only private by convention – it is in fact a public function. Functional Object Construction Because of the weirdness involved in using constructor functions some JavaScript developers prefer to eschew them completely. They theorize that it is better to work with JavaScript’s functional nature than to try and force it to behave like a traditional class-oriented language. When using the functional approach objects are created by returning them from a factory function. An excellent side effect of this pattern is that variables defined with the factory function are accessible to the new object (due to closure) but are inaccessible from anywhere else. The Person example implemented using the functional object construction pattern is: var personFactory = function(name, age) { var privateVar = 7; return { toString: function() { return name + " is " + age * privateVar / privateVar + " years old."; } }; }; var john2 = personFactory("John Lennon", 40); console.log(john2.toString()); Note that the ‘new’ keyword is not used for this pattern, and that the toString() function has access to the name, age and privateVar variables because of closure. This pattern can be extended to provide inheritance and, unlike the constructor function pattern, it supports private variables. However, when working with JavaScript code bases you will find that the constructor function is more common – probably because it is a better approximation of mainstream class oriented languages like C# and Java. Inheritance Both of the above patterns can support inheritance but for now, favour composition over inheritance. Summary When JavaScript code exceeds simple browser automation object orientation can provide a powerful paradigm for controlling complexity. Both of the patterns presented in this article work – the choice is a matter of style. Only one question still remains; who is John Galt?

    Read the article

  • JavaScript Class Patterns

    - by Liam McLennan
    To write object-oriented programs we need objects, and likely lots of them. JavaScript makes it easy to create objects: var liam = { name: "Liam", age: Number.MAX_VALUE }; But JavaScript does not provide an easy way to create similar objects. Most object-oriented languages include the idea of a class, which is a template for creating objects of the same type. From one class many similar objects can be instantiated. Many patterns have been proposed to address the absence of a class concept in JavaScript. This post will compare and contrast the most significant of them. Simple Constructor Functions Classes may be missing but JavaScript does support special constructor functions. By prefixing a call to a constructor function with the ‘new’ keyword we can tell the JavaScript runtime that we want the function to behave like a constructor and instantiate a new object containing the members defined by that function. Within a constructor function the ‘this’ keyword references the new object being created -  so a basic constructor function might be: function Person(name, age) { this.name = name; this.age = age; this.toString = function() { return this.name + " is " + age + " years old."; }; } var john = new Person("John Galt", 50); console.log(john.toString()); Note that by convention the name of a constructor function is always written in Pascal Case (the first letter of each word is capital). This is to distinguish between constructor functions and other functions. It is important that constructor functions be called with the ‘new’ keyword and that not constructor functions are not. There are two problems with the pattern constructor function pattern shown above: It makes inheritance difficult The toString() function is redefined for each new object created by the Person constructor. This is sub-optimal because the function should be shared between all of the instances of the Person type. Constructor Functions with a Prototype JavaScript functions have a special property called prototype. When an object is created by calling a JavaScript constructor all of the properties of the constructor’s prototype become available to the new object. In this way many Person objects can be created that can access the same prototype. An improved version of the above example can be written: function Person(name, age) { this.name = name; this.age = age; } Person.prototype = { toString: function() { return this.name + " is " + this.age + " years old."; } }; var john = new Person("John Galt", 50); console.log(john.toString()); In this version a single instance of the toString() function will now be shared between all Person objects. Private Members The short version is: there aren’t any. If a variable is defined, with the var keyword, within the constructor function then its scope is that function. Other functions defined within the constructor function will be able to access the private variable, but anything defined outside the constructor (such as functions on the prototype property) won’t have access to the private variable. Any variables defined on the constructor are automatically public. Some people solve this problem by prefixing properties with an underscore and then not calling those properties by convention. function Person(name, age) { this.name = name; this.age = age; } Person.prototype = { _getName: function() { return this.name; }, toString: function() { return this._getName() + " is " + this.age + " years old."; } }; var john = new Person("John Galt", 50); console.log(john.toString()); Note that the _getName() function is only private by convention – it is in fact a public function. Functional Object Construction Because of the weirdness involved in using constructor functions some JavaScript developers prefer to eschew them completely. They theorize that it is better to work with JavaScript’s functional nature than to try and force it to behave like a traditional class-oriented language. When using the functional approach objects are created by returning them from a factory function. An excellent side effect of this pattern is that variables defined with the factory function are accessible to the new object (due to closure) but are inaccessible from anywhere else. The Person example implemented using the functional object construction pattern is: var john = new Person("John Galt", 50); console.log(john.toString()); var personFactory = function(name, age) { var privateVar = 7; return { toString: function() { return name + " is " + age * privateVar / privateVar + " years old."; } }; }; var john2 = personFactory("John Lennon", 40); console.log(john2.toString()); Note that the ‘new’ keyword is not used for this pattern, and that the toString() function has access to the name, age and privateVar variables because of closure. This pattern can be extended to provide inheritance and, unlike the constructor function pattern, it supports private variables. However, when working with JavaScript code bases you will find that the constructor function is more common – probably because it is a better approximation of mainstream class oriented languages like C# and Java. Inheritance Both of the above patterns can support inheritance but for now, favour composition over inheritance. Summary When JavaScript code exceeds simple browser automation object orientation can provide a powerful paradigm for controlling complexity. Both of the patterns presented in this article work – the choice is a matter of style. Only one question still remains; who is John Galt?

    Read the article

  • Modifying a gedit syntax highlighting file

    - by Oscar Saleta Reig
    I am trying to change a highlighting file from Gedit. I have modified the file /usr/share/gtksourceview-3.0/language-specs/fortran.lang because I want to change the cases in which the editor takes a statement as a comment. The problem I have is that when I choose the new highlighting scheme nothing highlights, it just remains as plain text. The file fortran.lang was opened with su permissions and I just copy-pasted everything into a new Gedit file and later saved it as fortran_enhanced.lang in the same folder. The changes I've done to the original file are these: Original fortran.lang file: <language id="fortran" _name="Fortran 95" version="2.0" _section="Sources"> <metadata> <property name="mimetypes">text/x-fortran</property> <property name="globs">*.f;*.f90;*.f95;*.for</property> <property name="line-comment-start">!</property> </metadata> <styles> <style id="comment" _name="Comment" map-to="def:comment"/> <style id="floating-point" _name="Floating Point" map-to="def:floating-point"/> <style id="keyword" _name="Keyword" map-to="def:keyword"/> <style id="intrinsic" _name="Intrinsic function" map-to="def:builtin"/> <style id="boz-literal" _name="BOZ Literal" map-to="def:base-n-integer"/> <style id="decimal" _name="Decimal" map-to="def:decimal"/> <style id="type" _name="Data Type" map-to="def:type"/> </styles> <default-regex-options case-sensitive="false"/> <definitions> <!-- Note: contains an hack to avoid considering ^COMMON a comment --> <context id="line-comment" style-ref="comment" end-at-line-end="true" class="comment" class-disabled="no-spell-check"> <start>!|(^[Cc](\b|[^OoAaYy]))</start> <include> <context ref="def:escape"/> <context ref="def:in-line-comment"/> </include> </context> (...) Modified fortran_enhanced.lang file: <!-- Note: changed language id and name --> <language id="fortran_enhanced" _name="Fortran 95 2.0" version="2.0" _section="Sources"> <metadata> <property name="mimetypes">text/x-fortran</property> <!-- Note: removed *.f and *.for from file extensions --> <property name="globs">*.f90;*.f95;</property> <property name="line-comment-start">!</property> </metadata> <styles> <style id="comment" _name="Comment" map-to="def:comment"/> <style id="floating-point" _name="Floating Point" map-to="def:floating-point"/> <style id="keyword" _name="Keyword" map-to="def:keyword"/> <style id="intrinsic" _name="Intrinsic function" map-to="def:builtin"/> <style id="boz-literal" _name="BOZ Literal" map-to="def:base-n-integer"/> <style id="decimal" _name="Decimal" map-to="def:decimal"/> <style id="type" _name="Data Type" map-to="def:type"/> </styles> <default-regex-options case-sensitive="false"/> <definitions> <!-- Note: I want comments only beginning with !, not C --> <context id="line-comment" style-ref="comment" end-at-line-end="true" class="comment" class-disabled="no-spell-check"> <start>!</start> <include> <context ref="def:escape"/> <context ref="def:in-line-comment"/> </include> </context> (...) I have read this question [ Custom gedit Syntax Highlighting for Dummies? ] and I tried to make the new fortran_enhanced.lang file readable with $ cd /usr/share/gtksourceview-3.0/language-specs $ sudo chmod 0644 fortran_enhanced.lang but it doesn't seem that made some difference. I have to say that I have never done a thing like this before and I don't even understand most of the language file, so I am open to every criticism, as I have been guided purely by intuition. Thank you in advanced!

    Read the article

  • how to remove the link from the following javascript?

    - by murali
    hi i am unable to the remove the link from the keywords which are coming from database.... var googleurl="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q="; function displayResults(keyword, results_array) { // start building the HTML table containing the results var div = "<table>"; // if the searched for keyword is not in the cache then add it to the cache try { // if the array of results is empty display a message if(results_array.length == 0) { div += "<tr><td>No results found for <strong>" + keyword + "</strong></td></tr>"; // set the flag indicating that no results have been found // and reset the counter for results hasResults = false; suggestions = 0; } // display the results else { // resets the index of the currently selected suggestion position = -1; // resets the flag indicating whether the up or down key has been pressed isKeyUpDownPressed = false; /* sets the flag indicating that there are results for the searched for keyword */ hasResults = true; // loop through all the results and generate the HTML list of results for (var i=0; i<results_array.length-1; i++) { // retrieve the current function crtFunction = results_array[i]; // set the string link for the for the current function // to the name of the function crtFunctionLink = crtFunction; // replace the _ with - in the string link while(crtFunctionLink.indexOf("_") !=-1) crtFunctionLink = crtFunctionLink.replace("_","-"); // start building the HTML row that contains the link to the // help page of the current function div += "<tr id='tr" + i + "' onclick='location.href=document.getElementById(\"a" + i + "\").href;' onmouseover='handleOnMouseOver(this);' " + "onmouseout='handleOnMouseOut(this);'>" + "<td align='left'><a id='a" + i + "' href='" + googleurl + crtFunctionLink ; // check to see if the current function name length exceeds the maximum // number of characters that can be displayed for a function name if(crtFunction.length <= suggestionMaxLength) { div += "'>" + crtFunction.substring(0, httpRequestKeyword.length) + "" div += crtFunction.substring(httpRequestKeyword.length, crtFunction.length) + "</a></td></tr>"; } else { // check to see if the length of the current keyword exceeds // the maximum number of characters that can be displayed if(httpRequestKeyword.length < suggestionMaxLength) { div += "'>" + crtFunction.substring(0, httpRequestKeyword.length) + "" div += crtFunction.substring(httpRequestKeyword.length, suggestionMaxLength) + "</a></td></tr>"; } else { div += "'>" + crtFunction.substring(0,suggestionMaxLength) + "</td></tr>" } } } } // end building the HTML table div += "</table>"; var oSuggest = document.getElementById("suggest"); var oScroll = document.getElementById("scroll"); // scroll to the top of the list //oScroll.scrollTop = 1; -- murali commented // update the suggestions list and make it visible oSuggest.innerHTML =div; oScroll.style.visibility = "visible"; // if we had results we apply the type ahead for the current keyword if(results_array.length > 0) autocompleteKeyword(); } catch(e) { } } how to remove href tag from the following snippet... when i remove anything the drop down vanishes.... pls help me how to remove the href from the above snippet

    Read the article

  • Meta tags again. Good or bad to use them as page content?

    - by Guandalino
    From a SEO point of view, is it wise to use exactly the same page title value and keyword/description meta tag values not only as meta information, but also as page content? An example illustrates what I mean. Thanks for any answer, best regards. <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> <html> <head> <title>Meta tags again. Good or bad to use them as page content?</title> <meta name="DESCRIPTION" content="Why it is wise to use (or not) page title, meta tags description and keyword values as page content."> <meta name="KEYWORDS" content="seo,meta,tags,cms,content"> </head> <body> <h1>Meta tags again. Good or bad to use them as page content?</h1> <h2>Why it is wise to use (or not) page title, meta tags description and keyword values as page content.</h2> <ul> <li><a href="http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/seo">seo</a> <li><a href="http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/meta">meta</a> <li><a href="http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/tags">tags</a> <li><a href="http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/cms">cms</a> <li><a href="http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/content">content</a> </ul> <p>Read the discussion on <a href="#">webmasters.stackexchange.com</a>. </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • Meta tags again. Good or bad to use them as page content?

    - by Guandalino
    From a SEO point of view, is it wise to use exactly the same page title value and keyword/description meta tag values not only as meta information, but also as page content? An example illustrates what I mean. Thanks for any answer, best regards. <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> <html> <head> <title>Meta tags again. Good or bad to use them as page content?</title> <meta name="DESCRIPTION" content="Why it is wise to use (or not) page title, meta tags description and keyword values as page content."> <meta name="KEYWORDS" content="seo,meta,tags,cms,content"> </head> <body> <h1>Meta tags again. Good or bad to use them as page content?</h1> <h2>Why it is wise to use (or not) page title, meta tags description and keyword values as page content.</h2> <ul> <li><a href="http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/seo">seo</a> <li><a href="http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/meta">meta</a> <li><a href="http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/tags">tags</a> <li><a href="http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/cms">cms</a> <li><a href="http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/content">content</a> </ul> <p>Read the discussion on <a href="#">webmasters.stackexchange.com</a>. </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • Google music search: a better way to listen.

    - by anirudha
    somebody who want to listen music  pay much more to some online music store for online listening. otherwise they experience bad or low quality on YouTube. who is illegal  because uploader not have a permission or right to upload the document and their is no guarantee that they not put their ads or quality as same. now forget YouTube and all other because Google music search is much better just go their search the song by movies name or song and just click and listen. the quality is much better then other but it is not Google. the result they put comes from other website. i feel a thing goes wrong in Google music  search  that if i search “sajda” they never show me result about “sadka” because the word in common life use as same both. but the song may be starting from  “sajda” or “sadka”. i thing that they put the link that Do you means “Sadka” when i search sajda that it is better thing just like many online book store show the different keyword related to your keyword when you search their. like you search for a book on online book store they show you some different keyword when they serve the result and show related product or books when you go to a product page. after thinking all it is a better option for user to feel a better quality music without search hassle.

    Read the article

  • Passing Strings by Ref

    - by SGWellens
    Humbled yet again…DOH! No matter how much experience you acquire, no matter how smart you may be, no matter how hard you study, it is impossible to keep fully up to date on all the nuances of the technology we are exposed to. There will always be gaps in our knowledge: Little 'dead zones' of uncertainty. For me, this time, it was about passing string parameters to functions. I thought I knew this stuff cold. First, a little review... Value Types and Ref Integers and structs are value types (as opposed to reference types). When declared locally, their memory storage is on the stack; not on the heap. When passed to a function, the function gets a copy of the data and works on the copy. If a function needs to change a value type, you need to use the ref keyword.  Here's an example:     // ---- declaration -----------------     public struct MyStruct    {        public string StrTag;    }     // ---- functions -----------------------     void SetMyStruct(MyStruct myStruct)     // pass by value    {        myStruct.StrTag = "BBB";    }     void SetMyStruct(ref MyStruct myStruct)  // pass by ref    {        myStruct.StrTag = "CCC";    }     // ---- Usage -----------------------     protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)    {        MyStruct Data;        Data.StrTag = "AAA";         SetMyStruct(Data);        // Data.StrTag is still "AAA"         SetMyStruct(ref Data);        // Data.StrTag is now "CCC"    } No surprises here. All value types like ints, floats, datetimes, enums, structs, etc. work the same way. And now on to... Class Types and Ref     // ---- Declaration -----------------------------     public class MyClass    {        public string StrTag;    }     // ---- Functions ----------------------------     void SetMyClass(MyClass myClass)  // pass by 'value'    {        myClass.StrTag = "BBB";    }     void SetMyClass(ref MyClass myClass)   // pass by ref    {        myClass.StrTag = "CCC";    }     // ---- Usage ---------------------------------------     protected void Button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)    {        MyClass Data = new MyClass();        Data.StrTag = "AAA";         SetMyClass(Data);          // Data.StrTag is now "BBB"         SetMyClass(ref Data);        // Data.StrTag is now "CCC"    }  No surprises here either. Since Classes are reference types, you do not need the ref keyword to modify an object. What may seem a little strange is that with or without the ref keyword, the results are the same: The compiler knows what to do. So, why would you need to use the ref keyword when passing an object to a function? Because then you can change the reference itself…ie you can make it refer to a completely different object. Inside the function you can do: myClass = new MyClass() and the old object will be garbage collected and the new object will be returned to the caller. That ends the review. Now let's look at passing strings as parameters. The String Type and Ref Strings are reference types. So when you pass a String to a function, you do not need the ref keyword to change the string. Right? Wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong. When I saw this, I was so surprised that I fell out of my chair. Getting up, I bumped my head on my desk (which really hurt). My bumping the desk caused a large speaker to fall off of a bookshelf and land squarely on my big toe. I was screaming in pain and hopping on one foot when I lost my balance and fell. I struck my head on the side of the desk (once again) and knocked myself out cold. When I woke up, I was in the hospital where due to a database error (thanks Oracle) the doctors had put casts on both my hands. I'm typing this ever so slowly with just my ton..tong ..tongu…tongue. But I digress. Okay, the only true part of that story is that I was a bit surprised. Here is what happens passing a String to a function.     // ---- Functions ----------------------------     void SetMyString(String myString)   // pass by 'value'    {        myString = "BBB";    }     void SetMyString(ref String myString)  // pass by ref    {        myString = "CCC";    }     // ---- Usage ---------------------------------     protected void Button3_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)    {        String MyString = "AAA";         SetMyString(MyString);        // MyString is still "AAA"  What!!!!         SetMyString(ref MyString);        // MyString is now "CCC"    } What the heck. We should not have to use the ref keyword when passing a String because Strings are reference types. Why didn't the string change? What is going on?   I spent hours unssuccessfully researching this anomaly until finally, I had a Eureka moment: This code: String MyString = "AAA"; Is semantically equivalent to this code (note this code doesn't actually compile): String MyString = new String(); MyString = "AAA"; Key Point: In the function, the copy of the reference is pointed to a new object and THAT object is modified. The original reference and what it points to is unchanged. You can simulate this behavior by modifying the class example code to look like this:      void SetMyClass(MyClass myClass)  // call by 'value'    {        //myClass.StrTag = "BBB";        myClass = new MyClass();        myClass.StrTag = "BBB";    } Now when you call the SetMyClass function without using ref, the parameter is unchanged...just like the string example.  I hope someone finds this useful. Steve Wellens

    Read the article

  • How to Figure AdSense PPC with AdWords CPC of $0.05

    - by Melanie
    Often when I am using the Adwords Keyword tool I find keywords with a CPC of $0.05... I mean VERY often. Is this like base level when it comes to PPC or is this a possible error? For example, with a few keywords I have targetted with a 0.05 CPC, I often find a PPC of 0.25 or more. Obviously, this is because my content is triggering other keywords, although it is centered around a 0.05 keyword. I have found several keywords that have over 200,000 searches using the [exact] search parameter but have a CPC of $0.05. I plan on writing content to cover these keywords, but I am trying to figure the approximate value of these keywords. 0.05 leads me to believe there are no advertisers so IF someone were to advertise and use this keyword, it would cost them ~0.05. But since there is obviously no demand for these keywords and thus they aren't getting bids, other ads MUST be shown. How can I predict the value of ads with a CPC of $0.05? Strange question I know, but I'm just trying to understand this a bit more.

    Read the article

  • How to target just one search engine and optimise for that

    - by mickburkejnr
    I've been dabbling with SEO a lot in the last 6 months, and one thing that has surprised me is the disparity between Google and Bing in the way they deliver results. A website ranked for a specific keyword/phrase on Google may rank 3rd on the first page, but using the same keyword/phrase on Bing will display the same website but ranked 15th for the exact same keyword/phrase. I came up with the idea to increase traffic to my website by targetting Bing instead of Google for several reasons. The biggest one is that while it's not the biggest search provider, people still use it, and I feel that if other websites have been "neglected" and not optimised for Bing my website would stand a better chance of getting near the top of their search rankings. The question is though how would I do this? A lot of the SEO advice on the internet is generic, but I can't help feeling it's Google orientated for obvious reasons. How could I optimise my website to be Bing friendly, rather than Google friendly? I know it sounds like suicide as I'm taking myself out of the Google mindset, but I feel it could work wonders for traffic to the site.

    Read the article

  • New features in SQL Prompt 6.4

    - by Tom Crossman
    We’re pleased to announce a new beta version of SQL Prompt. We’ve been trying out a few new core technologies, and used them to add features and bug fixes suggested by users on the SQL Prompt forum and suggestions forum. You can download the SQL Prompt 6.4 beta here (zip file). Let us know what you think! New features Execute current statement In a query window, you can now execute the SQL statement under your cursor by pressing Shift + F5. For example, if you have a query containing two statements and your cursor is placed on the second statement: When you press Shift + F5, only the second statement is executed:   Insert semicolons You can now use SQL Prompt to automatically insert missing semicolons after each statement in a query. To insert semicolons, go to the SQL Prompt menu and click Insert Semicolons. Alternatively, hold Ctrl and press B then C. BEGIN…END block highlighting When you place your cursor over a BEGIN or END keyword, SQL Prompt now automatically highlights the matching keyword: Rename variables and aliases You can now use SQL Prompt to rename all occurrences of a variable or alias in a query. To rename a variable or alias, place your cursor over an instance of the variable or alias you want to rename and press F2: Improved loading dialog box The database loading dialog box now shows actual progress, and you can cancel loading databases:   Single suggestion improvement SQL Prompt no longer suggests keywords if the keyword has been typed and no other suggestions exist. Performance improvement SQL Prompt now has less impact on Management Studio start up time. What do you think? We want to hear your feedback about the beta. If you have any suggestions, or bugs to report, tell us on the SQL Prompt forum or our suggestions forum.

    Read the article

  • C++ keeping a list of objects and calling a contructor through another function

    - by Nona Urbiz
    why isnt my object being created? When I do it like so, I am told error C2065: 'AllReferrals' : undeclared identifier as well as error C2228: left of '.push_back' must have class/struct/union. If I put the list initialization before the class I get error C2065: 'AllReferrals' : undeclared identifier. Thanks! #include <iostream> #include <fstream> #include <regex> #include <string> #include <list> #include <map> using namespace std; using namespace tr1; class Referral { public: string url; map<string, int> keywords; static bool submit(string url, string keyword, int occurrences) { //if(lots of things i'll later add){ Referral(url, keyword, occurrences); return true; //} //else // return false; } private: list<string> urls; Referral(string url, string keyword, int occurrences) { url = url; keywords[keyword] = occurrences; AllReferrals.push_back(this); } }; static list<Referral> AllReferrals; int main() { Referral::submit("url", "keyword", 1); cout << AllReferrals.size(); cout << "\n why does that ^^ say 0 (help me make it say one)?"; cout << "\n and how can i AllReferrals.push_back(this) from my constructor?"; cout << " When I do it like so, I am told error C2065: 'AllReferrals' : undeclared identifier"; cout << " as well as error C2228: left of '.push_back' must have class/struct/union."; cout << " If I put the list initialization before the class I get error C2065: 'AllReferrals' : undeclared identifier."; cout << "\n\n\t Thanks!"; getchar(); }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  | Next Page >