Search Results

Search found 1810 results on 73 pages for 'smtp'.

Page 26/73 | < Previous Page | 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33  | Next Page >

• Sendmail - Relaying denied (state 14)

  - by Ekevoo

  I have my sendmail.cf file configured to send local mail and to receive external mail to local users. So sending mail from the server to the external world works fine, but the other way around does not... I get an error e-mail saying: Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: [email protected] Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.7.1 root@75.xxx.xxx.xxx... Relaying denied (state 14). Also I can't find logs in /var/log, all I see is this binary file in /var/log/mail/statistics Thanks!

  Read the article

• sendmail can not relay from itself

  - by Bernie

  I am running 3 centos 5.2 servers and I have configured the server for forward all messages to root to be emailed to me via .forward rule. This is working fine on two of the servers but not on the third. I have also tried copying the mail config files from the backup server and placing them on the file server and restarting sendmail. I also removed and reinstalled sendmail via yum but the results are the same. I am not sure what the issue could be they are all standard centos installs. Here is an example from the backup server which is working and the fileserver which isn't I am also going to include the mail log. good from backup server [root@backup ]# sendmail -v [email protected] < test.mail [email protected]... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... 220 backup.localhost ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.8/8.13.8; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:23:50 -0700 >>> EHLO backup.localhost 250-backup.localhost Hello backup.localhost [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP >>> MAIL From:<[email protected]> SIZE=73 250 2.1.0 <[email protected]>... Sender ok >>> RCPT To:<[email protected]> >>> DATA 250 2.1.5 <[email protected]>... Recipient ok 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself >>> . 250 2.0.0 n9GHNoGC020924 Message accepted for delivery [email protected]... Sent (n9GHNoGC020924 Message accepted for delivery) Closing connection to [127.0.0.1] >>> QUIT 221 2.0.0 backup.localhost closing connection bad from file server [root@fileserver bernie]# sendmail -v [email protected] < test.mail [email protected]... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... 220 fileserver.localhost ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.8/8.13.8; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:23:26 -0700 >>> EHLO fileserver.localhost 250-fileserver.localhost Hello fileserver.localhost [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you 250 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES >>> MAIL From:<[email protected]> 550 5.0.0 Access denied root... Using cached ESMTP connection to [127.0.0.1] via relay... >>> RSET 250 2.0.0 Reset state >>> MAIL From:<> 550 5.0.0 Access denied postmaster... Using cached ESMTP connection to [127.0.0.1] via relay... >>> RSET 250 2.0.0 Reset state >>> MAIL From:<> 550 5.0.0 Access denied Closing connection to [127.0.0.1] >>> QUIT 221 2.0.0 fileserver.localhost closing connection mail log Oct 16 10:39:13 fileserver sendmail[28059]: n9GHdDom028059: from=root, size=72, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[email protected]>, relay=root@localhost Oct 16 10:39:13 fileserver sendmail[28060]: n9GHdDwl028060: tcpwrappers (fileserver.localhost, 127.0.0.1) rejection Oct 16 10:39:13 fileserver sendmail[28059]: n9GHdDom028059: [email protected], ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30072, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=5.0.0, stat=Service unavailable Oct 16 10:39:13 fileserver sendmail[28059]: n9GHdDom028059: n9GHdDon028059: DSN: Service unavailable Oct 16 10:39:13 fileserver sendmail[28059]: n9GHdDon028059: to=root, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=31096, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=5.0.0, stat=Service unavailable Oct 16 10:39:13 fileserver sendmail[28059]: n9GHdDon028059: n9GHdDoo028059: return to sender: Service unavailable Oct 16 10:39:13 fileserver sendmail[28059]: n9GHdDoo028059: to=postmaster, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=32120, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=5.0.0, stat=Service unavailable Oct 16 10:39:13 fileserver sendmail[28059]: n9GHdDon028059: Losing ./qfn9GHdDon028059: savemail panic Oct 16 10:39:13 fileserver sendmail[28059]: n9GHdDon028059: SYSERR(root): savemail: cannot save rejected email anywhere

  Read the article

• Exim log and send all mail for a given domain through another server

  - by Josh

  I administer a handful of shared web hosting servers. Recently, Yahoo has been deprioritizing/greylising all email sent from these servers. I am getting the dereaded 421 4.7.0 [TS02] Messages from my.ip.address temporarily deferred message from Yahoo and their postmaster has been unresponsive. I am unable to find any way to set up a feedback loop like AOL has for my IP address -- I did find a way to set up a feedback loop for a given domain, but we host hundreds of domains, and don't have the time to set up that many feedback loops. So what I'd like to do is twofold: Configure Exim to send all email destined to an @yahoo.com address to a relay, a new server which has an IP that yahoo is not blocking. Configure Exim (or maybe the relay) to log all emails sent to @yahoo.com, so I can review them and, in case one of my uses is violating ToS and sending SPAM to yahoo users, take the appropriate action. How could I accomplish these? Or, does anyone have any other advice for how to get mail to flow through Yahoo and ensure that any email generating complaints is brought to my attention? (For what it's worth, these servers are not listed on any major blacklists)

  Read the article

• Configure BL-C111A IP Camera

  - by csmba

  I am an ATT DSL customer. I want the camera to send an email when motion detection is triggered. Can anyone tell me how he managed to do that using: GMail (I cannot because I don't think it supports SSL) other alternatives if GMail is not supported

  Read the article

• Postfix relay with Exchange Server

  - by Parsa

  Is it possible (or even logical) to use Postfix as relay MTA with Microsoft Exchange Server 2007, and if so how?

  Read the article

• Using ClearOS as a gateway/firewall/mailserver

  - by Elzenissimo

  Hi, Just installed ClearOS on a PC to act as our firewall firstly and then to act as an internal mailserver. My question is: Can i create a mailserver that then routes the mail through to our ISP mail server without having to contact the ISP and gain MX records etc..? We are a small business (5 PCs + dataserver) and the reason this is interesting is because we need to keep a record of outgoing mails from certain users, as well as spam and virus filtering.

  Read the article

• Can't access Postfix TLS/SSL

  - by skerit

  I have set up my Postfix, with TLS/SSL, correctly. Every test on the machine itself (with telnet) runs fine. However, when I want to access the server from somewhere else, it fails. So port 587 and the rest is blocked for some reason, but I don't really know where.

  Read the article

• Configure a SPF rule on Ubuntu

  - by TiuTalk

  Where I can create/insert the SPF rules to allow a external server to authenticate and send e-mails using the domain name of my server running Ubuntu? I need to insert this rule: v=spf1 ip4:111.111.111.111/29 ip4:111.111.111.111/24 a mx ~all Thanks :)

  Read the article

• IMAP/POP won't send allow emails to outside- New Dell PowerEdge 7310 running SBS 2011

  - by user779887

  I have a brand new out of the box Dell PowerEdge T310 running SBS 2011. Our employees at our remote offices can't send emails to recipients outside of our own domain. The workstations at the same location as the server aren't having any problem. I would at this time like to say "Thanks a lot" to the super-minds at Microsoft for protecting our email server from rogue computers attempting to send fake emails. (Silly me I thought proper login and password conventions would handle that.) I know this is something dealing with relaying but thus far nothing from any posts I've read have changed anything. Honestly, if someone is crafty enough to guess one of our login/password combos, let them send emails through our server I don't care!

  Read the article

• hMail server - sending copy of an e-mail changing the sender

  - by Beggycev

  Dear All please help me with following request. I am using hMail server in a company(test.com) and have several hundred of guest e-mail accounts ([email protected]). I need to accomplish this: When any of the guest e-mails receives a message(either from internal or external sender) this e-mail(or its copy) is sent to another address "[email protected]" which is the same for all of these guest e-mails. But I need the sender to be identified as the [email protected] not as the original sender which happens when I use forwarding. I tried to prepare a simple VBS script using the OnAcceptMessage event to accomplish this. and it works on my testing machine without internet connectivity but not in the production environment. To be specific, if I send an e-mail to [email protected] in my test env it is delivered to the [email protected] with [email protected] being a sender. But in the production env the e-mail stays in the guest mailbox with the original sender. I am interested in any solution, using a rule in hMail or script, anything is welcome. Thank you for any help! The script: Sub OnAcceptMessage(oClient, oMessage) 'creating application object in order to perform operations as hMail server administrator Dim obApp Set obApp = CreateObject("hMailServer.Application") Dim adminLogin Dim adminPassword 'Enter actual values for administrator account and password 'CHANGE HERE: adminLogin = "Admin_login" adminPassword = "password" Call obApp.Authenticate(adminLogin, adminPassword) Dim addrStart 'Take first 5 characters of recipients address addrStart = Mid(oMessage.To, 1, 5) 'if the recipient's address start with "guest" if addrStart = "guest" then Dim recipient Dim recipientAddress 'enter name of the recipient and respective e-mail address() 'CHANGE HERE: recipient = "FINAL" recipientAddress = "[email protected]" 'change the sender and sender e-mail address to the guest oMessage.FromAddress = oMessage.To oMessage.From = oMessage.To & "<" & oMessage.To & ">" 'delete recipients and enter a new one - the actual mps and its e-mail from the variables set above oMessage.ClearRecipients() oMessage.AddRecipient recipient, recipientAddress 'save the e-mail oMessage.save end if End Sub

  Read the article

• Extreme headache from ASSP Extreme Ban

  - by Chase Florell

  I've got a local user on my server that as of today cannot send email from any of their devices. Only Webmail (which doesn't touch any of their devices) works. Here are the various email failures I'm receiving in the logs. Dec-04-12 19:52:47 75966-05166 [SpoofedSender] 111.111.111.111 <[email protected]> to: [email protected] [scoring:20] -- No Spoofing Allowed -- [Test]; Dec-04-12 19:52:47 75966-05166 [Extreme] 111.111.111.111 <[email protected]> to: [email protected] [spam found] -- score for 111.111.111.111 is 1980, surpassing extreme level of 500 -- [Test] -> spam/Test__1.eml; Dec-04-12 19:52:48 75968-05169 111.111.111.111 <[email protected]> to: [email protected] [scoring:10] -- IP in HELO does not match connection: '[192.168.0.10]' -- [Re Demo Feedbacks for End of November Sales]; Dec-04-12 19:52:48 75968-05169 [SpoofedSender] 111.111.111.111 <[email protected]> to: [email protected] [scoring:20] -- No Spoofing Allowed -- [Re Demo Feedbacks for End of November Sales]; Dec-04-12 19:52:48 75968-05169 [Extreme] 111.111.111.111 <[email protected]> to: [email protected] [spam found] -- score for 111.111.111.111 is 2020, surpassing extreme level of 500 -- [Re Demo Feedbacks for End of November Sales] ->spam/Re_Demo_Feedbacks_for_End_of_N__2.eml; Dec-04-12 19:52:57 75977-05179 [SpoofedSender] 111.111.111.111 <[email protected]> to: [email protected] [scoring:20] -- No Spoofing Allowed -- [test]; Dec-04-12 19:52:57 75977-05179 [Extreme] 111.111.111.111 <[email protected]> to: [email protected] [spam found] -- score for 111.111.111.111 is 2040, surpassing extreme level of 500 -- [test] -> spam/test__3.eml; ……………. Dec-04-12 19:55:35 76135-05338 [SpoofedSender] 111.111.111.111 <[email protected]> to: [email protected] [scoring:20] -- No Spoofing Allowed -- [test]; Dec-04-12 19:55:35 76135-05338 [MsgID] 111.111.111.111 <[email protected]> to: [email protected] [scoring] (Message-ID not valid: 'E8472A91545B44FBAE413F6D8760C7C3@bts'); Dec-04-12 19:55:35 76135-05338 [InvalidHELO] 111.111.111.111 <[email protected]> to: [email protected] [spam found] -- Invalid HELO: 'bts' -- [test] -> discarded/test__4.eml; note: 111.111.111.111 is a replacement for the users home IP address Here is the headers of one of the messages X-Assp-Score: 10 (HELO contains IP: '[192.168.0.10]') X-Assp-Score: 10 (IP in HELO does not match connection: '[192.168.0.10]') X-Assp-Score: 20 (No Spoofing Allowed) X-Assp-Score: 10 (bombSubjectRe: 'sale') X-Assp-Score: 20 (blacklisted HELO '[192.168.0.10]') X-Assp-Score: 45 (DNSBLcache: failed, 111.111.111.111 listed in safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net) X-Assp-DNSBLcache: failed, 174.0.35.31 listed in safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net X-Assp-Received-SPF: fail (cache) ip=174.0.35.31 [email protected] helo=[192.168.0.10] X-Assp-Score: 10 (SPF fail) X-Assp-Envelope-From: [email protected] X-Assp-Intended-For: [email protected] X-Assp-Version: 1.7.5.7(1.0.07) on ASSP.nospam X-Assp-ID: ASSP.nospam (77953-07232) X-Assp-Spam: YES X-Assp-Original-Subject: Re: Demo Feedbacks for End of November Sales X-Spam-Status:yes X-Assp-Spam-Reason: MessageScore (125) over limit (50) X-Assp-Message-Totalscore: 125 Received: from [192.168.0.10] ([111.111.111.111] helo=[192.168.0.10]) with IPv4:25 by ASSP.nospam; 4 Dec 2012 20:25:52 -0700 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-40FE7453-4BE7-4AD6-B297-FB81DAA554EC Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Demo Feedbacks for End of November Sales References: <003c01cdd22e$eafbc6f0$c0f354d0$@com> From: Some User <[email protected]> In-Reply-To: <003c01cdd22e$eafbc6f0$c0f354d0$@com> Message-Id: <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 19:32:28 -0700 To: External User <[email protected]> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A523) Why is it that a local sender has been banned on our local server, and how can I fix this?

  Read the article

• Does DKIM works with subdomains?

  - by Feelsgoodman

  ISP's recommend you segment your marketing and transactional emails by using different IPs. I want to start using DKIM, but since DKIM is a domain based reputation system I wonder if signing with the same company.com domain will impact the reputation of transactional emails, since both them and marketing will be signed with the same domain? Is using DKIM with subdomains possible? Would something like this: bulk.company.com and transactional.company.com be a good idea? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Sending email from various domains

  - by IMHO

  We are building hosted software service that is used by multiple customers. These customers want to communicate with their customers (end customer). So, today we send it from our domain: example.com However, we would like to send email to come from their specific domains. When we put their customer emails in Reply-To - it shows up as "on behalf" in clients like outlook. What are the ways to send email from their domain without installing software on their network?

  Read the article

• Surgemail DNS lookup failure

  - by Spencer Ruport

  Just curious if anyone has any experience with Surgemail. I've set it up a couple times and never had an issue but my latest install keeps leaving outgoing messages in the queue with the error "DNS Lookup Failed". I double checked that the local DNS server is running and even tried switching the IPs to my ISP's DNS servers but still no go. [DNS] Ok(avge) Bad(avge) 76.227.63.137: 0(0.0s) 5(31.0s) 76.227.63.254: 0(0.0s) 1(0.0s) Anyone have any ideas why this might be happening?? Thanks.

  Read the article

• sendmail redhat

  - by lepricon123

  For some reason even after providing the sender's from adress my mails are not being delivered as from is missing as below maillog. Any suggestions? May 8 20:08:43 tawq02 sendmail[13443]: o4938hJD013443: ruleset=check_mail, arg1=<{}, relay=localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1], reject=553 5.5.4 <{}... Domain name required for sender address {} May 8 20:08:43 tawq02 sendmail[13443]: o4938hJD013443: from=<{}, size=0, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]

  Read the article

• Exchange Disconnecting on EHLO with remote telnet

  - by Timothy Baldridge

  When I go to the local terminal on my Exchange box (SBS 2008) I can do this: telnet 127.0.0.1 25 220 Exchange banner here EHLO example.com 250 Server name However when I go from another box, or from the actual IP of the server I get this: telnet 192.168.21.20 25 220 Exchange banner here EHLO example.com 421 4.4.1 Connection timed out Connection to host lost. The odd thing is, this server is currently in production and working fine (receiving mail for our entire domain). But my C# programs can't send mail to it (they get this same error). Any ideas?

  Read the article

• Postfix connect timing out remotely, working fine locally

  - by Moritz

  Running Postfix on Debian I cannot connect to send mail any more. It worked until approximately a week ago. I do not recall touching the configuration of the server during that time, which makes it difficult for me to find out what the problem is. When connecting from the server to itself it works fine: root@xxxx:~# telnet localhost 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost.localdomain. Escape character is '^]'. ehlo localhost 220 mail.xxxx.de ESMTP Postfix (Debian/GNU) 250-mail.xxxx.de 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 10240000 250-VRFY 250-ETRN 250-STARTTLS 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8BITMIME 250 DSN quit 221 2.0.0 Bye Connection closed by foreign host. Trying to do the same remotely times out: laptop:~ $ telnet mail.xxxx.de 25 Trying 93.xx.xx.xx... telnet: connect to address 93.xx.xx.xx: Operation timed out telnet: Unable to connect to remote host Configuration is as follows: root@xxxx:~# postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases append_dot_mydomain = no biff = no broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes config_directory = /etc/postfix home_mailbox = Maildir/ inet_interfaces = all inet_protocols = ipv4 mailbox_command = mailbox_size_limit = 0 mydestination = localhost.localdomain, localhost.localdomain, localhost myhostname = mail.xxxx.de mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 [::ffff:127.0.0.0]/104 [::1]/128 myorigin = /etc/mailname readme_directory = no recipient_delimiter = + relayhost = smtp_tls_note_starttls_offer = yes smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtp_scache smtp_use_tls = yes smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Debian/GNU) smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks,reject_unauth_destination smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes smtpd_sasl_exceptions_networks = $mynetworks smtpd_sasl_local_domain = smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot smtpd_tls_CAfile = /etc/postfix/ssl/cacert.pem smtpd_tls_auth_only = no smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/postfix/ssl/smtpd.crt smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/postfix/ssl/smtpd.key smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1 smtpd_tls_received_header = yes smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache smtpd_tls_session_cache_timeout = 3600s smtpd_use_tls = yes tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom virtual_alias_maps = proxy:mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf virtual_gid_maps = static:8 virtual_mailbox_base = /var/vmail virtual_mailbox_domains = proxy:mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf virtual_mailbox_maps = proxy:mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf virtual_minimum_uid = 150 virtual_transport = dovecot Receiving mails is no problem, as is retrieving them remotely. Do you have an idea what I could check next?

  Read the article

• Using ClearOS as a gateway/firewall/mailserver

  - by Elzenissimo

  Just installed ClearOS on a PC to act as our firewall firstly and then to act as an internal mailserver. My question is: Can i create a mailserver that then routes the mail through to our ISP mail server without having to contact the ISP and gain MX records etc..? We are a small business (5 PCs + dataserver) and the reason this is interesting is because we need to keep a record of outgoing mails from certain users, as well as spam and virus filtering.

  Read the article

• sendmail relay status

  - by Andy

  Hello all, I have a RHEL3 server with sendmail configured to relay mail to: # "Smart" relay host (may be null) DSmailrelay This relay server is an exchange server not administered by me. A few days ago its IP address was changed without my knowledge so I've updated the correct ip in /etc/hosts for the mail relay entry. Unfortunately no mail is currently going through and maillog reports: Oct 26 14:32:39 fsimag sendmail[12580]: n9Q3VxPA012580: from=root, size=3685, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<~R.*.2009102614315955@*>, relay=root@localhost Oct 26 14:32:39 fsimag sendmail[12580]: n9Q3VxPA012580: to=wodwest@*.net, delay=00:00:40, mailer=esmtp, pri=33685, dsn=4.4.3, stat=queued Oct 26 14:36:09 fsimag sendmail[13670]: n9Q3ZTcf013670: from=root, size=5831, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<~R.medicus.2009102614352914@*>, relay=root@localhost Oct 26 14:36:09 fsimag sendmail[13670]: n9Q3ZTcf013670: to=tsgastro@(.net, delay=00:00:40, mailer=esmtp, pri=35831, dsn=4.4.3, stat=queued Oct 26 14:36:50 fsimag sendmail[13882]: n9Q3aAxj013882: from=root, size=5830, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<~C.medicus.2009102614361009@*>, relay=root@localhost Oct 26 14:36:50 fsimag sendmail[13882]: n9Q3aAxj013882: to=elmwood@*.net, delay=00:00:40, mailer=esmtp, pri=35830, dsn=4.4.3, stat=queued (With domains obscured) The mailq command shows nothing, and I've also tried connecting to this new mail server via telnet and manually sending and reports as being queued but not sent. The administrator of this machine has put it back to me saying he sees no problems, and I just want to cover everything before passing it back to him. Is there any other tests/logs/reasons for sendmail to only report it as "stat=queued" ? I've looked in previous logs and the relay is set to root@localhost in those but none were ever set to queued. Thanks for any help, Andy

  Read the article

• How to legitimately work around ISP rate limits

  - by Derek Ting

  A lot of ISP rate limit the amount of e-mails that is sent from a particular IP address. What is the proper way to get around that rate limit? Our company has an iPhone application that sends many e-mails because of our large user base and many e-mails go to different ISPs that rate limit the number of messages coming from a specific IP. We do not send spam and we are a legitimate business. However, is there a better way to resolve this limitation rather than just getting a ton of IP addresses? Ideally, I wouldn't want to rely on a third party service to send mail. However, if its the only possible solution, we would consider.

  Read the article

• Postfix Problem (helo/hostname mismatch)!

  - by CuSS

  Hi all, I have a server, and it is running a error for one email only (all other mails in that domain are working). How can i fix it? (The error is above:) May 17 11:43:56 webserver postfix/policyd-weight[5596]: weighted check: IN_DYN_PBL_SPAMHAUS=3.25 NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 DSBL_ORG=ERR(0) CL_IP_NE_HELO=4.75 RESOLVED_IP_IS_NOT_HELO=1.5 HELO_NUMERIC=10.625 (check from: .eticagest. - helo: .[10.0.0.17]. - helo-domain: .17].) FROM_NOT_FAILED_HELO(DOMAIN)=6.25; <client=188.80.139.211> <helo=[10.0.0.17]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>; rate: 21.875 May 17 11:43:56 webserver postfix/policyd-weight[5596]: decided action=550 Mail appeared to be SPAM or forged. Ask your Mail/DNS-Administrator to correct HELO and DNS MX settings or to get removed from DNSBLs; MTA helo: [10.0.0.17], MTA hostname: bl15-139-211.dsl.telepac.pt[188.80.139.211] (helo/hostname mismatch); <client=188.80.139.211> <helo=[10.0.0.17]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>; delay: 6s

  Read the article

• How to distribute email's delivery between 2 or more servers

  - by user181186

  We provide Email Marketing service through our online App. We have about 30 customers. And each one has it's own mailling list (5k to 20k emails each). What we really want is to distribute email's delivery between 2 or more servers. I was wondering What kind of aproach/solutions MailChimp , Constant Contact uses to provide a great service ? use many servers ? many IPs ? Our spam policy suspends ANY user/customer that gets 10% bounced .

  Read the article

• Sending mail in localhost:25 with Ssmtp

  - by Juan

  I already have Ssmtp installed and working in a Centos 5.7 machine with Gmail configured. I can send mails in th shell without problems. Now i want to use the ssmtp to allow a web app (installed in the same machine) to send mails but for do this i have to find a way to ssmtp "hears" in the port 25 (or any other). There is a way to do this? There is another simple alternative to ssmtp who allows to send mail using localhost:25? Thanks.

  Read the article

• McAfee Secure Messaging Service / Postini: false positive?

  - by Martin

  Hello, I'm puzzled by this email message that gets quarantined by McAfee Secure Messaging Service (it's based on Postini) for no reason that I can think of. Here are the Postini headers: X-pstn-2strike: clear X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0 X-pstn-levels: (S: 0.02932/98.63596 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 ) X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.0000:1.0000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from [db-null] X-pstn-disposition: quarantine I read the docs (http://www.mcafee-sms.com/webdocs/admin%5Fee%5Fmcafee/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=MACAFFHelp&file=header%5Foverview.html#951634) and in short, the x-pstn-settings header tells me that NONE of the filters was triggered, but the x-pstn-levels header tells me that the final score (0.02932) is low enough to classify the email as bulk/spam. Can anyone explain to me why the final score is so low when none of the filters were triggered? Does anyone have any suggestions on how to prevent this from happening? Regards, Martin

  Read the article

• Minimize the chance my email is blocked/filtered as spam

  - by justSteve

  I'm running a web-based store where order confirmations are sometimes blocked and don't reach the intended user. The structure of the business model is such that our product is marketed to the end-user by a 3rd parities - affiliates how are known entities to the end-users and email is freely exchanged between end-users and our affiliates. Our confirmations being blocked is becoming a big enough problem that we are considering implementing a system where a 'confirmations' address is created within the affiliates domain, then we'd have our app send via the affiliate's mail server instead of our own. But that'd be lots of work. The idea has been raised to have our app use our affiliates' email in the FROM field but still send from our server. My thinking is that would be detected at the end-users side and blocked just as often - we dealing with institutions large enough at least some checks up at the perimeter. Is this assumption correct (more likely to be blocked) or is there a less round about way to send messages under the auspices of 3rd parties? thx

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33  | Next Page >