Search Results

Search found 3489 results on 140 pages for 'tcp'.

Page 27/140 | < Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >

• What port does OpenLink ODBC Driver use?

  - by user36737

  I use Avaya Reporting Services and OpenLink ODBC Drivers for db connection. I know that it uses port 5000 for handshaking but after that I believe it uses an random port for communication. I want to deploy my application and it will communicate with the client's system in their datacenter. They are asking what ports should they open on their firewalls. I can't obviously give them a range above 50,000 that I know OpenLink ODBC Drivers use. Can someone tell me what port should I tell my client to open?

  Read the article

• Linux server: Dropped packets

  - by Lars

  I see dropped packets using ifconfig on my eth0 interface: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:17:0d:03:ca inet addr:10.0.1.2 Bcast:10.0.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:9000 Metric:1 RX packets:30268348 errors:0 dropped:70721 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:133076885 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:8699434077 (8.6 GB) TX bytes:194937313025 (194.9 GB) Interrupt:16 Memory:feae0000-feb00000 When i use ethtool -S i dont see anything wrong: NIC statistics: rx_packets: 30267138 tx_packets: 133074510 rx_bytes: 8699356158 tx_bytes: 194934147340 rx_broadcast: 35296 tx_broadcast: 5435 rx_multicast: 0 tx_multicast: 0 rx_errors: 0 tx_errors: 0 tx_dropped: 0 multicast: 0 collisions: 0 rx_length_errors: 0 rx_over_errors: 0 rx_crc_errors: 0 rx_frame_errors: 0 rx_no_buffer_count: 0 rx_missed_errors: 0 tx_aborted_errors: 0 tx_carrier_errors: 0 tx_fifo_errors: 0 tx_heartbeat_errors: 0 tx_window_errors: 0 tx_abort_late_coll: 0 tx_deferred_ok: 0 tx_single_coll_ok: 0 tx_multi_coll_ok: 0 tx_timeout_count: 0 tx_restart_queue: 0 rx_long_length_errors: 0 rx_short_length_errors: 0 rx_align_errors: 0 tx_tcp_seg_good: 5757001 tx_tcp_seg_failed: 0 rx_flow_control_xon: 8649 rx_flow_control_xoff: 62072 tx_flow_control_xon: 0 tx_flow_control_xoff: 0 rx_long_byte_count: 8699356158 rx_csum_offload_good: 30212111 rx_csum_offload_errors: 0 rx_header_split: 10857552 alloc_rx_buff_failed: 0 tx_smbus: 0 rx_smbus: 0 dropped_smbus: 0 rx_dma_failed: 0 tx_dma_failed: 0 I am running Ubuntu 12.04 with kernel 3.2.0-30-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP I have pinged every device on my internal network for about 24 hours, without packet loss. Also checked my router and my interface to the WAN, also no errors there. Does anyone have any clue?

  Read the article

• How to use a different Ethernet connection

  - by SteveC

  I'm running a virtual machine at home which has a VPN connection to our main office, but I also want to connect to a share on another machine at home. When I check with IPCONFIG I can see two ethernet connections ... my work VPN ... Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection* 11: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : xxxx::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxxxxx IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.254.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX and home local ... Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : lan Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : xxxx::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxxxxx IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.70 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : What's weird is when I've been working before with a plugged-in ethernet cable I've not had any problem getting to the share? I can PING the other machine, but I can't access the share at ... \\othermachine\c$ I tried 'TRACERT` but that disappears off to the work network and eventually gets back to the local other machine after a few time-outs Is there anyway to "force" the connection to stay local ? UPDATE: the VPN is AEP SSL Tunnel

  Read the article

• IPtables rate-limit, What are the differences between modules? Recent, Limit

  - by TechZilla

  I am doing some rate-limiting with IPtables, and i'm not sure if I should use "Recent" or "Limit" What are the differences between the two? If they both achieve the same result, which one has better performance? I would like to know, regardless if any difference would be perceivable. I am looking to ACCEPT if under limit, and REJECT if over. I'm not interested in thus bandwidth throttling, I don't want a queue. I don't need any syntax examples, both have ample use examples online. I have also used Limit in the past. I appreciate any responses.

  Read the article

• What does it mean that most dropped packets have a different incoming and outgoing port?

  - by Kev

  Over the weekend an internet-facing DI-624 router of mine was e-mailing me logs like crazy for some reason. Normally it's a few a day, but it was about one every few minutes instead. Analyzing the messages, I found that only 340 had the same src and dst port number, whereas the majority of "default deny" dropped packets (28,000+) had the two ports different. What does this mean?

  Read the article

• LAN connection suddenly domain_not_set.invalid

  - by Liam Coates

  I went to work today - internet fine as always. Came back, dreaded yellow triangle. I can connect wirelessly like i am now on my tablet. Thats completely fine. But through LAN I get the domain_not_set.Invalid message if I renew my IP for example. It seems I just don't have a DNS. But I have literally not touched anything no ones even been in the house. Hows that happen? Any help on why only wireless works would be great, I am gonna buy a wireless adapter tomorrow for the interim but I would like to know why. Thanks.

  Read the article

• What is the "in-the-wire" size of a ethernet frame? 1518 or 1542?

  - by chrisapotek

  According to the table here, it says that MTU = 1500 bytes and that the payload part is 1500 - 42 bytes or 1458 bytes (<- this is actually wrong!). Now on top of that you have to add IPv4 and UDP headers, which are 28 bytes (20 IP + 8 UDP). That leaves my maximum possible application message to as 1430 bytes! But by looking for this number in the Internet I see 1472 instead. Am I doing this calculation wrong here? All I want to find out is the maximum application message I can send over the wire without the risk of fragmentation. It is definitely not 1500 because that includes the frame headers. Can someone help? The confusion is the the PAYLOAD can actually be as large as 1500 bytes and that's the MTU. So now what is the size in-the-wire for a payload of 1500? From that table it can be as big as 1542 bytes. So the maximum app messages I can send is 1472 (1500 - 20 (ip) - 8 (udp)) for a maximum in the wire size of 1542. It amazes me how things can get so complicated when they are actually simple. And I have not clue how someone came up with the number 1518 if the table says 1542.

  Read the article

• Does DisableTaskOffload disable all related LAN Adapter settings?

  - by vfclists

  I have been getting problems disabling Checksum Offload in a lot of LAN adapters manually. Does setting the DisableTaskOffload value in the registry disable all of the related parameters regardless of LAN card? ie is the use of the LAN adapter offload capabilities controlled by Windows itself?

  Read the article

• High data on recv-q buffer and thread lock on java.io.BufferedInputStream in linux

  - by Sagar Patel

  We have a java application running on linux (ubuntu server). We have been facing high recv-q problem since quite some time. Application gets hang and does not read data from socket every few hours. In thread dump, we have found below stack trace. "Receiver-146" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00007fb3fc010000 nid=0x7642 runnable [0x00007fb5906c5000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at java.net.SocketInputStream. socketRead0(Native Method) at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:150) at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:121) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:235) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read1(BufferedInputStream.java:275) at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334) - locked <0x00000007688f1ff0> (a java.io.BufferedInputStream) at org.smpp.TCPIPConnection.receive(TCPIPConnection.java:413) at org.smpp.ReceiverBase.receivePDUFromConnection(ReceiverBase.java:197) at org.smpp.Receiver.receiveAsync(Receiver.java:351) at org.smpp.ReceiverBase.process(ReceiverBase.java:96) at org.smpp.util.ProcessingThread.run(ProcessingThread.java:199) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722) We are not able to trace the exact reason behind this? Kindly help. We are using 16 core machine and load on the system is around 30-40 at the time of issue. We use command ss dst <ip> to find out recv-q. Recently we have been facing issues with recv-q size getting hung, were in receive buffer gets stuck at some point of time. But recvQ size is not decreasing and as a result we are losing a lot of hits from the other side, our application is not accepting any data.

  Read the article

• Why can't a PC with 2 network cards be accessed by hostname?

  - by lewis

  I set up PC with 2 network cards, connected to the same LAN. I can connect to this PC (e.g. by remote desktop) only via ip-addresses. Accessing by hostname does not work. Why is this the case? UPDATE: Full environment 1. PC with 2 hardware network adapters. 2. On this PC installed VMWare Workstation. Created 3 VM's, networked by "bridged" network setting in VMWare. 3. In LAN all ip-addresses given from DHCP. 4. Win2k8 on all hosts (both physical and vitrual). As result: 1. PC has 2 ip-address (e.g. 192.168.1.71 and 192.168.1.72). PC available in LAN by ip-addreses, but not avail by hostname. 2. VM's has own ip-addr on each (e.g. 192.168.1.73, *74, *75 etc). They are available from LAN by their ip's, BUT not by their hostnames. How can I access to PC and to VM's by hostname?

  Read the article

• How do networking ports work? Can I configure the ports that client and server use?

  - by joedotnot

  Let's say i have a "server" program listening on address 1.2.3.4:69 (i.e. remote port 69) When i connect from a "client" program to it, typically i would specify the IP address + port of the target or server system; But what port would the client be using ? And how does the server know which port to connect back to the client on? I understand this question is very general, but just wanting to get a general feel for how things work. Then extending this to a specific protocol, say FTP (typical port 21), can I change it such that the server uses port 69, but the client uses port 100? And similarly, for Remote Desktop in WinXP (typical port 3389), i know how to change the server port to be something other than 3389, but how does one change what port the client uses (if at all possible)?

  Read the article

• Many ISP's is block port 25, how do I choose an alternative port?

  - by Xeoncross

  I am building an application that will be acting as a combined MUA/MTA on different networks. However, many of the networks are with ISP's that block port 25 for SMTP. Therefore I would also like to open up a secondary port so that some of the installs can communicate on that if port 25 is closed. How do I choose a second port? I know some people use port 26 or port 2525. What is the correct way to choose a port that won't interfere with existing software?

  Read the article

• apache chokes after 300 connections

  - by john titus

  We have an apache webserver in front of Tomcat hosted on EC2, instance type is extra large with 34GB memory. Our application deals with lot of external webservices and we have a very lousy external webservice which takes almost 300 seconds to respond to requests during peak hours. During peak hours the server chokes at just about 300 httpd processes. ps -ef | grep httpd | wc -l =300 I have googled and found numerous suggestions but nothing seems to work.. following are some configuration i have done which are directly taken from online resources. I have increased the limits of max connection and max clients in both apache and tomcat. here are the configuration details: //apache <IfModule prefork.c> StartServers 100 MinSpareServers 10 MaxSpareServers 10 ServerLimit 50000 MaxClients 50000 MaxRequestsPerChild 2000 </IfModule> //tomcat <Connector port="8080" protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol" connectionTimeout="600000" redirectPort="8443" enableLookups="false" maxThreads="1500" compressableMimeType="text/html,text/xml,text/plain,text/css,application/x-javascript,text/vnd.wap.wml,text/vnd.wap.wmlscript,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml-dtd,application/xslt+xml" compression="on"/> //Sysctl.conf net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse=1 net.ipv4.tcp_tw_recycle=1 fs.file-max = 5049800 vm.min_free_kbytes = 204800 vm.page-cluster = 20 vm.swappiness = 90 net.ipv4.tcp_rfc1337=1 net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans = 65536 net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 5000 65000 net.core.somaxconn = 1024 I have been trying numerous suggestions but in vain.. how to fix this? I'm sure m2xlarge server should serve more requests than 300, probably i might be going wrong with my configuration.. The server chokes only during peak hours and when there are 300 concurrent requests waiting for the [300 second delayed] webservice to respond. Please help..

  Read the article

• Can not open port 3306 on Ubuntu using iptables

  - by user94626

  I am trying to open port 3306 (for remote mysql connections) on my ubuntu 12.04 server machine but for the life of me can't get the damned thing to work! Here is what I did: 1) list current firewall rules: $> sudo iptables -nL -v output: Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 225 16984 fail2ban-ssh tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 multiport dports 22 220 69605 ACCEPT all -- lo * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 0 0 REJECT all -- lo * 0.0.0.0/0 127.0.0.0/8 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable 486 54824 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED 1 60 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:80 19 988 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:443 1 52 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:22 0 0 ACCEPT icmp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 icmptype 8 4 208 LOG all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 5/min burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 7 prefix "iptables denied: " 4 208 REJECT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 0 0 REJECT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 735 182K ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain fail2ban-ssh (1 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 225 16984 RETURN all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 2) try to connect from remote machine: $> mysql -u root -p -h x.x.x.x output: timeout.... failed to connect 3) try to add a new rule to iptables: iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 3306 -j ACCEPT 4) make sure the new rule is added: $> sudo iptables -nL -v output: Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 359 25972 fail2ban-ssh tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 multiport dports 22 251 78665 ACCEPT all -- lo * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 0 0 REJECT all -- lo * 0.0.0.0/0 127.0.0.0/8 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable 628 64420 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED 1 60 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:80 19 988 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:443 1 52 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:22 0 0 ACCEPT icmp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 icmptype 8 5 260 LOG all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 5/min burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 7 prefix "iptables denied: " 5 260 REJECT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:3306 Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 0 0 REJECT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 919 213K ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain fail2ban-ssh (1 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 359 25972 RETURN all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 which appears to be the case (last line in "Chain INPUT" section). 5) try to connect again from remote machine: $> mysql -u root -p -h x.x.x.x output: timeout.... failed to connect which is failing again. 6) try to flush all rules: $> sudo iptables -F 7) this time I CAN CONNECT. 8) reboot server and try to connect, FAILURE. I suspect since the new rule is being appended at the end it will have no effect as there appears to be a "reject all" sort of rule before it. If this is the case, how to make sure the new rule is added in the right order? Otherwise, what am I missing? Please help.

  Read the article

• Request to server x Reply from server y

  - by klaasio

  I need some advice from you guys: I'm dealing with a custom loadbalancer/software for which we will use 2 main servers and about 8 slave servers. In short: User sends request to main server, main server will receive and handle the requests, sends a request to a slave server and slave server should send data DIRECTLY to the "user". User - Main server Main server - Slave server Slave server - User The reason for which data should be send directly to the user and not through the main server is because of bandwidth and low budget. Now I have the following idea's: -IPinIP, but that is not possible in Layer7 (so far i know there some expensive routers for that) -IP Spoof, using C/C++ we will make it look like the reply came from main server. But I was thinking, perhaps the reply "slave server - User" could just come from a different IP without causing issues in the firewall from the user or his anti-virus. I don't know so well about "home" firewalls/routers and/or anti-virus software. I guess the user machine wouldn't handle it well?

  Read the article

• Why would one server be sending DUP ACK packets to one PC, which is responding with HTTP RST packets?

  - by IronicMuffin

  I'm not a network profressional, so please excuse any wrong language. I was debugging why my DNS traffic was a constant 160Kbps on our corporate network. I opened up a wireshark trace, and I see one PC of a coworker broadcasting HTTP [RST] packets to one of our DMZ servers at the rate of 1000 a second. He restarted his machine, and as soon as it went offline, the server started broadcasting [DUP] [ACK] packets, until he came back online. It then resumed the HTTP [RST] packets. Apparently this server has been doing this kind of behavior since it went live. I believe it did this with a printer and an access point as well. Can anyone explain why this behavior is occurring? Any solutions? The initial research was done because there have been "bandwidth issues" and I wonder if this is contributing.

  Read the article

• Download resume support blocked by isp?

  - by John Doe

  Can ISP block resume support for downloads ? I'm using IDM (internet download manager) to download of the internet from resume supported websites, yet I am unable to resume downloads. I tried different computers with the same result. Turned off firewall, didn't have any effect i was able to download with no issues until a couple of days ago. Another thing i noticed is that before IDM used to try to connect to several connections to speed up my download, but now it can only connect to one connection. Also i tried to download using my vpn, and i was able to download and resume downloads with no problem.

  Read the article

• Testifying that somaxconn change can make a difference

  - by petermolnar

  I got into an argument on the net.core.somaxconn parameter: I was told that it will not make any difference if we change the default 128. I believed this might be enough proof: "If the backlog argument is greater than the value in /proc/sys/net/core/somaxconn, then it is silently truncated to that value" http://linux.die.net/man/2/listen but it's not. So does anyone know a method to testify this with two machines, one running, for example MySQL or LVS and the other is hammering it in a GBit network? I'm opened to any solution, scripts are slightly more welcome.

  Read the article

• Clients can make maximum only 15 connections to ubuntu custom server

  - by gtan

  I have a custom server in C# being run on Ubuntu 9 under mono. I can make up to 15 silverlight clients connect to the server. When I make the 16th, it just waits. And if I close one of the established connections, the 16th client is able to connect. I am making the connections from one machine. I am also not exceeding any file handle limit. The limit is 1024 and I am having around 300. Any ideas how to make more connections? Also why the number 15? Is it something linux-specific? EDIT: I have run the same server on an Ubuntu 11.10 virtual machine and was able to make more than 15 connections. I presume it's a configuration problem on the Ubuntu 9 machine then. Any help on that?

  Read the article

• ActiveMQ - "Cannot send, channel has already failed" every 2 seconds?

  - by quanta

  ActiveMQ 5.7.0 In the activemq.log, I'm seeing this exception every 2 seconds: 2013-11-05 13:00:52,374 | DEBUG | Transport Connection to: tcp://127.0.0.1:37501 failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Cannot send, channel has already failed: tcp://127.0.0.1:37501 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | Async Exception Handler org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Cannot send, channel has already failed: tcp://127.0.0.1:37501 at org.apache.activemq.transport.AbstractInactivityMonitor.doOnewaySend(AbstractInactivityMonitor.java:282) at org.apache.activemq.transport.AbstractInactivityMonitor.oneway(AbstractInactivityMonitor.java:271) at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.oneway(TransportFilter.java:85) at org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.oneway(WireFormatNegotiator.java:104) at org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.oneway(MutexTransport.java:68) at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.dispatch(TransportConnection.java:1312) at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.processDispatch(TransportConnection.java:838) at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.iterate(TransportConnection.java:873) at org.apache.activemq.thread.PooledTaskRunner.runTask(PooledTaskRunner.java:129) at org.apache.activemq.thread.PooledTaskRunner$1.run(PooledTaskRunner.java:47) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) Due to this keyword InactivityIOException, the first thing comes to my mind is InactivityMonitor, but the strange thing is MaxInactivityDuration=30000: 2013-11-05 13:11:02,672 | DEBUG | Sending: WireFormatInfo { version=9, properties={MaxFrameSize=9223372036854775807, CacheSize=1024, CacheEnabled=true, SizePrefixDisabled=false, MaxInactivityDurationInitalDelay=10000, TcpNoDelayEnabled=true, MaxInactivityDuration=30000, TightEncodingEnabled=true, StackTraceEnabled=true}, magic=[A,c,t,i,v,e,M,Q]} | org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator | ActiveMQ BrokerService[localhost] Task-2 Moreover, I also didn't see something like this: No message received since last read check for ... or: Channel was inactive for too (30000) long Do a netstat, I see these connections in TIME_WAIT state: tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:38545 127.0.0.1:61616 TIME_WAIT - tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:38544 127.0.0.1:61616 TIME_WAIT - tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:38522 127.0.0.1:61616 TIME_WAIT - Here're the output when running tcpdump: Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1), Dst: 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) Version: 4 Header length: 20 bytes Differentiated Services Field: 0x00 (DSCP 0x00: Default; ECN: 0x00: Not-ECT (Not ECN-Capable Transport)) 0000 00.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Default (0x00) .... ..00 = Explicit Congestion Notification: Not-ECT (Not ECN-Capable Transport) (0x00) Total Length: 296 Identification: 0x7b6a (31594) Flags: 0x02 (Don't Fragment) 0... .... = Reserved bit: Not set .1.. .... = Don't fragment: Set ..0. .... = More fragments: Not set Fragment offset: 0 Time to live: 64 Protocol: TCP (6) Header checksum: 0xc063 [correct] [Good: True] [Bad: False] Source: 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) Destination: 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 61616 (61616), Dst Port: 54669 (54669), Seq: 1, Ack: 2, Len: 244 Source port: 61616 (61616) Destination port: 54669 (54669) [Stream index: 11] Sequence number: 1 (relative sequence number) [Next sequence number: 245 (relative sequence number)] Acknowledgement number: 2 (relative ack number) Header length: 32 bytes Flags: 0x018 (PSH, ACK) 000. .... .... = Reserved: Not set ...0 .... .... = Nonce: Not set .... 0... .... = Congestion Window Reduced (CWR): Not set .... .0.. .... = ECN-Echo: Not set .... ..0. .... = Urgent: Not set .... ...1 .... = Acknowledgement: Set .... .... 1... = Push: Set .... .... .0.. = Reset: Not set .... .... ..0. = Syn: Not set .... .... ...0 = Fin: Not set Window size value: 256 [Calculated window size: 32768] [Window size scaling factor: 128] Checksum: 0xff1c [validation disabled] [Good Checksum: False] [Bad Checksum: False] Options: (12 bytes) No-Operation (NOP) No-Operation (NOP) Timestamps: TSval 2304161892, TSecr 2304161891 Kind: Timestamp (8) Length: 10 Timestamp value: 2304161892 Timestamp echo reply: 2304161891 [SEQ/ACK analysis] [Bytes in flight: 244] Constrained Application Protocol, TID: 240, Length: 244 00.. .... = Version: 0 ..00 .... = Type: Confirmable (0) .... 0000 = Option Count: 0 Code: Unknown (0) Transaction ID: 240 Payload Content-Type: text/plain (default), Length: 240, offset: 4 Line-based text data: text/plain [truncated] \001ActiveMQ\000\000\000\t\001\000\000\000<DE>\000\000\000\t\000\fMaxFrameSize\006\177<FF><FF><FF><FF> <FF><FF><FF>\000\tCacheSize\005\000\000\004\000\000\fCacheEnabled\001\001\000\022SizePrefixDisabled\001\000\000 MaxInactivityDurationInitalDelay\006\ It is very likely a tcp port check. This is what I see when trying telnet from another host: 2013-11-05 16:12:41,071 | DEBUG | Transport Connection to: tcp://10.8.20.9:46775 failed: java.io.EOFException | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///10.8.20.9:46775@61616 java.io.EOFException at java.io.DataInputStream.readInt(DataInputStream.java:375) at org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.unmarshal(OpenWireFormat.java:275) at org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.readCommand(TcpTransport.java:229) at org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.doRun(TcpTransport.java:221) at org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:204) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) 2013-11-05 16:12:41,071 | DEBUG | Transport Connection to: tcp://10.8.20.9:46775 failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Cannot send, channel has already failed: tcp://10.8.20.9:46775 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | Async Exception Handler org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Cannot send, channel has already failed: tcp://10.8.20.9:46775 at org.apache.activemq.transport.AbstractInactivityMonitor.doOnewaySend(AbstractInactivityMonitor.java:282) at org.apache.activemq.transport.AbstractInactivityMonitor.oneway(AbstractInactivityMonitor.java:271) at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.oneway(TransportFilter.java:85) at org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.oneway(WireFormatNegotiator.java:104) at org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.oneway(MutexTransport.java:68) at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.dispatch(TransportConnection.java:1312) at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.processDispatch(TransportConnection.java:838) at org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.iterate(TransportConnection.java:873) at org.apache.activemq.thread.PooledTaskRunner.runTask(PooledTaskRunner.java:129) at org.apache.activemq.thread.PooledTaskRunner$1.run(PooledTaskRunner.java:47) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) 2013-11-05 16:12:41,071 | DEBUG | Unregistering MBean org.apache.activemq:BrokerName=localhost,Type=Connection,ConnectorName=ope nwire,ViewType=address,Name=tcp_//10.8.20.9_46775 | org.apache.activemq.broker.jmx.ManagementContext | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:/ //10.8.20.9:46775@61616 2013-11-05 16:12:41,073 | DEBUG | Stopping connection: tcp://10.8.20.9:46775 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection | ActiveMQ BrokerService[localhost] Task-5 2013-11-05 16:12:41,073 | DEBUG | Stopping transport tcp:///10.8.20.9:46775@61616 | org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTranspo rt | ActiveMQ BrokerService[localhost] Task-5 2013-11-05 16:12:41,073 | DEBUG | Initialized TaskRunnerFactory[ActiveMQ Task] using ExecutorService: java.util.concurrent.Threa dPoolExecutor@23cc2a28 | org.apache.activemq.thread.TaskRunnerFactory | ActiveMQ BrokerService[localhost] Task-5 2013-11-05 16:12:41,074 | DEBUG | Closed socket Socket[addr=/10.8.20.9,port=46775,localport=61616] | org.apache.activemq.transpo rt.tcp.TcpTransport | ActiveMQ Task-1 2013-11-05 16:12:41,074 | DEBUG | Forcing shutdown of ExecutorService: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@23cc2a28 | org.apache.activemq.util.ThreadPoolUtils | ActiveMQ BrokerService[localhost] Task-5 2013-11-05 16:12:41,074 | DEBUG | Stopped transport: tcp://10.8.20.9:46775 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection | ActiveMQ BrokerService[localhost] Task-5 2013-11-05 16:12:41,074 | DEBUG | Connection Stopped: tcp://10.8.20.9:46775 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection | ActiveMQ BrokerService[localhost] Task-5 2013-11-05 16:12:41,902 | DEBUG | Sending: WireFormatInfo { version=9, properties={MaxFrameSize=9223372036854775807, CacheSize=1024, CacheEnabled=true, SizePrefixDisabled=false, MaxInactivityDurationInitalDelay=10000, TcpNoDelayEnabled=true, MaxInactivityDuration=30000, TightEncodingEnabled=true, StackTraceEnabled=true}, magic=[A,c,t,i,v,e,M,Q]} | org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator | ActiveMQ BrokerService[localhost] Task-5 So the question is: how can I find out the process that is trying to connect to my ActiveMQ (from localhost) every 2 seconds?

  Read the article

• LDAP socket keep-alive

  - by Dmitry Khalatov

  We are using OpenLDAP client library to conect to an LDAP server. The problem is that if there is no activity for some time, server (or firewall in the middle) drops TCP connection. Our current implementation of "keep-alive" just does search for baseDN from time to time - any better ideas ?

  Read the article

• What is the equivalent to WinSock in the iPhone SDK?

  - by Jason

  I need to communicate with a hardware device using TCP and with Windows I would use WinSock. What is the equivalent library that I can use from the iPhone SDK?

  Read the article

• Finding a dll whose CLSID is known

  - by deostroll

  I've downloaded the w3sockets. Primarily using for trying to do telnet via an application. So far we've been experimenting with vbscript. In vbscript we do something like: Set socket = CreateObject("Socket.Tcp") I am trying to use this for a .net application. I need to know the dll it is hosted in. Anyway I can find this?

  Read the article

• TTCPServer limited to 10 connections?

  - by Stijn Sanders

  I've created a TCP server NT-Service in Delphi 6, I've tried Indy components, Ararat Synapse components, and am now trying just plain old TTcpServer to see which would perform best while using the least resources. I'm surprised to see that the live instance of the service (running on Windows Server) is still limited to 10 connections! Any new connections are forcibly disconnected. Have I missed something? Do I need to set a property or override a method of TCustomTcpServer?

  Read the article

• Enable RFC1323 on a per socket basis in Windows?

  - by Sheado

  Howdy.. Anybody know if it's possible to enable RFC1323 on a per TCP socket basis in windows? I know it can be changed system wide via the registry ( http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/tcptune/OStune/winxp/winxp_stepbystep.html ) Also, it seems like this is possible *nix via: int on=1; setsockopt(s,IPPROTO_TCP,TCP_RFC1323,&on,sizeof(on)); Is there a Windows equivalent? Thanky much!

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >