Search Results

Search found 32512 results on 1301 pages for 'object oriented analysis'.

Page 285/1301 | < Previous Page | 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292  | Next Page >

  • How to return a property name when comparing two properties at class-level

    - by CodeMonkey
    Hi I have implemented an 'EqualTo' Validation Attribute, that compares two Properties of an object, during ModelBinding in ASP.NET MVC 2. The problem I have is not with it not working, because it does work. The problem is, when I do my request - which is an ajax request - I get back errors to my front-end, where it sets a class on the input fields to indicate invalid input. What it does is iterate through a list of Errors (in a JsonResult), and set a class. This is all dandy. But the ValidationAtrribute I am having trouble with is set at a Class-level, i.e., it's not like other ValidationAttributes where you set something like "[Required]" or something like that. [AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, AllowMultiple=true, Inherited=false)] public class EqualToAttribute : ValidationAttribute { public String SourceProperty { get; set; } public String MatchProperty { get; set; } public EqualToAttribute(string source, string match) { SourceProperty = source; MatchProperty = match; } public override Boolean IsValid(Object value) { Type objectType = value.GetType(); PropertyInfo[] properties = objectType.GetProperties(); object sourceValue = new object(); object matchValue = new object(); Type sourceType = null; Type matchType = null; int counter = 0; foreach (PropertyInfo propertyInfo in properties) { if (propertyInfo.Name == SourceProperty || propertyInfo.Name == MatchProperty) { if (counter == 0) { sourceValue = propertyInfo.GetValue(value, null); sourceType = propertyInfo.GetValue(value, null).GetType(); } if (counter == 1) { matchValue = propertyInfo.GetValue(value, null); matchType = propertyInfo.GetValue(value, null).GetType(); } counter++; if (counter == 2) { break; } } } if (sourceType != null && matchType != null) { return sourceValue.ToString().Equals(matchValue.ToString()); //return Convert.ChangeType(sourceValue, sourceType) == Convert.ChangeType(matchValue, matchType); } return false; } private object _typeId = new object(); public override object TypeId { get { return this._typeId; } } } Now this code works, except for the fact that the validation process does not return which Property failed. And I simply can't figure out how to make it return one of the two. In reality I don't care which one it returns.. because both are failing.. Do you have an idea how to make it return the/or both Property/Properties that is/are failing.

    Read the article

  • How do I create a thread-safe write-once read-many value in Java?

    - by Software Monkey
    This is a problem I encounter frequently in working with more complex systems and which I have never figured out a good way to solve. It usually involves variations on the theme of a shared object whose construction and initialization are necessarily two distinct steps. This is generally because of architectural requirements, similar to applets, so answers that suggest I consolidate construction and initialization are not useful. By way of example, let's say I have a class that is structured to fit into an application framework like so: public class MyClass { private /*ideally-final*/ SomeObject someObject; MyClass() { someObject=null; } public void startup() { someObject=new SomeObject(...arguments from environment which are not available until startup is called...); } public void shutdown() { someObject=null; // this is not necessary, I am just expressing the intended scope of someObject explicitly } } I can't make someObject final since it can't be set until startup() is invoked. But I would really like it to reflect it's write-once semantics and be able to directly access it from multiple threads, preferably avoiding synchronization. The idea being to express and enforce a degree of finalness, I conjecture that I could create a generic container, like so: public class WoRmObject<T> { private T object; WoRmObject() { object=null; } public WoRmObject set(T val) { object=val; return this; } public T get() { return object; } } and then in MyClass, above, do: private final WoRmObject<SomeObject> someObject; MyClass() { someObject=new WoRmObject<SomeObject>(); } public void startup() { someObject.set(SomeObject(...arguments from environment which are not available until startup is called...)); } Which raises some questions for me: Is there a better way, or existing Java object (would have to be available in Java 4)? Is this thread-safe provided that no other thread accesses someObject.get() until after it's set() has been called. The other threads will only invoke methods on MyClass between startup() and shutdown() - the framework guarantees this. Given the completely unsynchronized WoRmObject container, it is ever possible under either JMM to see a value of object which is neither null nor a reference to a SomeObject? In other words, does has the JMM always guaranteed that no thread can observe the memory of an object to be whatever values happened to be on the heap when the object was allocated.

    Read the article

  • Any thoughts on how to create a true 'punch-out' area in a Sprite?

    - by rhtx
    I've been working on this for awhile, now. You might also call it a 'reverse mask', or an 'inverse mask'. Basically, I'm creating a view window within a display object. I need to allow objects on the stage that are under the window to be able to interact with the mouse. This is similar to a WPF question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/740994/use-wpf-object-to-punch-hole-in-another, which has a much shorter write-up. I've got a Class called PunchOutShield, which creates a Sprite that covers the stage (or over some desired area). The Sprite's Graphics object is filled using the color and transparency of Flex's modal screen. The result is a screen that looks like the screen which appears behind a modal PopUp. PunchOutShield has a method called punch, which takes two arguments - the first is a Shape object, which defines the shape of the punch-through area; the second is a Point object, which indicates where to position the punch-through area. It took some experimenting, but I found that I can successfully create a punch-out area (i.e. - the modal screen does not display within the bounds of the given Shape). To do this, I set cacheAsBitmap to true on the Sprite that is used to create the modal screen, and also on the Shape object, which is added to the modal screen Sprite's displayList. If I set the blend mode of the Shape to ERASE, a completely transparent area is created in the modal screen. So far, great. The problem is that Shape does not subclass InteractiveObject, so there is no way to set mouseEnabled = false on it. And so, it prevents interaction between the mouse and any objects that are visible through the punch-out area. On top of that, InteractiveObject isn't available to look at, so I can't see if there is a way to borrow what it's doing to provide the mouseEnabled functionality and apply it to a subclass of Shape. I've tried using another Sprite object, rather than a Shape object, but the blending doesn't work out correctly. I'm not sure why there is a difference, but the Shape object seems to somehow combine with the parenting Sprite, allowing the ERASE blendMode to effect the desired punch-out visual appearance. It wouldn't be the end of the world if I had to draw up the screen with a series of rectangles so that the punch-out area was just simply not drawn, but that approach won't work if the punch-out area is complex. Or round. Any thoughts on this approach, or on an alternative approach?

    Read the article

  • Can an asynchronously fired event run synchronously on a form?

    - by cyclotis04
    [VS 2010 Beta with .Net Framework 3.5] I've written a C# component to asynchronously monitor a socket and raise events when data is received. I set the VB form to show message boxes when the event is raised. What I've noticed is that when the component raises the event synchronously, the message box blocks the component code and locks the form until the user closes the message. When it's raised asynchronously, it neither blocks the code, nor locks the form. What I want is a way to raise an event in such a way that it does not block the code, but is called on the same thread as the form (so that it locks the form until the user selects an option.) Can you help me out? Thanks. [Component] using System; using System.Threading; using System.ComponentModel; namespace mySpace { public delegate void SyncEventHandler(object sender, SyncEventArgs e); public delegate void AsyncEventHandler(object sender, AsyncEventArgs e); public class myClass { readonly object syncEventLock = new object(); readonly object asyncEventLock = new object(); SyncEventHandler syncEvent; AsyncEventHandler asyncEvent; private delegate void WorkerDelegate(string strParam, int intParam); public void DoWork(string strParam, int intParam) { OnSyncEvent(new SyncEventArgs()); AsyncOperation asyncOp = AsyncOperationManager.CreateOperation(null); WorkerDelegate delWorker = new WorkerDelegate(ClientWorker); IAsyncResult result = delWorker.BeginInvoke(strParam, intParam, null, null); } private void ClientWorker(string strParam, int intParam) { Thread.Sleep(2000); OnAsyncEvent(new AsyncEventArgs()); OnAsyncEvent(new AsyncEventArgs()); } public event SyncEventHandler SyncEvent { add { lock (syncEventLock) syncEvent += value; } remove { lock (syncEventLock) syncEvent -= value; } } public event AsyncEventHandler AsyncEvent { add { lock (asyncEventLock) asyncEvent += value; } remove { lock (asyncEventLock) asyncEvent -= value; } } protected void OnSyncEvent(SyncEventArgs e) { SyncEventHandler handler; lock (syncEventLock) handler = syncEvent; if (handler != null) handler(this, e, null, null); // Blocks and locks //if (handler != null) handler.BeginInvoke(this, e, null, null); // Neither blocks nor locks } protected void OnAsyncEvent(AsyncEventArgs e) { AsyncEventHandler handler; lock (asyncEventLock) handler = asyncEvent; //if (handler != null) handler(this, e, null, null); // Blocks and locks if (handler != null) handler.BeginInvoke(this, e, null, null); // Neither blocks nor locks } } } [Form] Imports mySpace Public Class Form1 Public WithEvents component As New mySpace.myClass() Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click component.DoWork("String", 1) End Sub Private Sub component_SyncEvent(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As pbxapi.SyncEventArgs) Handles component.SyncEvent MessageBox.Show("Synchronous event", "Raised:", MessageBoxButtons.OK) End Sub Private Sub component_AsyncEvent(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As pbxapi.AsyncEventArgs) Handles component.AsyncEvent MessageBox.Show("Asynchronous event", "Raised:", MessageBoxButtons.OK) End Sub End Class

    Read the article

  • How do I tie a cmbBox that selects all drives (local and network) into a treeNode VB

    - by jpavlov
    How do i tie in a selected item from a cmbBox with a treeView? I am looking to just obtain the value of the one selected drive Thanks. Imports System Imports System.IO Imports System.IO.File Imports System.Windows.Forms Public Class F_Treeview_Demo Private Sub F_Treeview_Demo_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load ' Initialize the local directory treeview Dim nodeText As String = "" Dim sb As New C_StringBuilder With My.Computer.FileSystem 'Read in the number of drives For i As Integer = 0 To .Drives.Count - 1 '** Build the drive's node text sb.ClearText() sb.AppendText(.Drives(i).Name) cmbDrives.Items.Add(sb.FullText) Next End With ListRootNodes() End Sub Private Sub btnExit_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles btnExit.Click Application.Exit() End Sub Private Sub tvwLocalFolders_AfterSelect(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.Windows.Forms.TreeViewEventArgs) _ Handles tvwLocalFolders.AfterSelect ' Display the path for the selected node Dim folder As String = tvwLocalFolders.SelectedNode.Tag lblLocalPath.Text = folder ListView1.Items.Clear() Dim childNode As TreeNode = e.Node.FirstNode Dim parentPath As String = AddChar(e.Node.Tag) End Sub Private Sub AddToList(ByVal nodes As TreeNodeCollection) For Each node As TreeNode In nodes If node.Checked Then ListView1.Items.Add(node.Text) ListView1.Items.Add(Chr(13)) AddToList(node.Nodes) End If Next End Sub Private Sub tvwLocalFolders_BeforeExpand(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.Windows.Forms.TreeViewCancelEventArgs) _ Handles tvwLocalFolders.BeforeExpand ' Display the path for the selected node lblLocalPath.Text = e.Node.Tag ' Populate all child nodes below the selected node Dim parentPath As String = AddChar(e.Node.Tag) tvwLocalFolders.BeginUpdate() Dim childNode As TreeNode = e.Node.FirstNode 'this i added Dim smallNode As TreeNode = e.Node.FirstNode Do While childNode IsNot Nothing ListLocalSubFolders(childNode, parentPath & childNode.Text) childNode = childNode.NextNode ''this i added ListLocalFiles(smallNode, parentPath & smallNode.Text) Loop tvwLocalFolders.EndUpdate() tvwLocalFolders.Refresh() ' Select the node being expanded tvwLocalFolders.SelectedNode = e.Node ListView1.Items.Clear() AddToList(tvwLocalFolders.Nodes) ListView1.Items.Add(Environment.NewLine) End Sub Private Sub ListRootNodes() ' Add all local drives to the Local treeview Dim nodeText As String = "" Dim sb As New C_StringBuilder With My.Computer.FileSystem For i As Integer = 0 To .Drives.Count - 1 '** Build the drive's node text sb.ClearText() sb.AppendText(.Drives(i).Name) nodeText = sb.FullText nodeText = Me.cmbDrives.SelectedItem '** Add the drive to the treeview Dim driveNode As TreeNode driveNode = tvwLocalFolders.Nodes.Add(nodeText) 'driveNode.Tag = .Drives(i).Name '** Add the next level of subfolders 'ListLocalSubFolders(driveNode, .Drives(i).Name) ListLocalSubFolders(driveNode, nodeText) 'driveNode = Nothing Next End With End Sub Private Sub ListLocalFiles(ByVal ParentNode As TreeNode, ByVal PParentPath As String) Dim FileNode As String = "" Try For Each FileNode In Directory.GetFiles(PParentPath) Dim smallNode As TreeNode smallNode = ParentNode.Nodes.Add(FilenameFromPath(FileNode)) With smallNode .ImageIndex = 0 .SelectedImageIndex = 1 .Tag = FileNode End With smallNode = Nothing Next Catch ex As Exception End Try End Sub Private Sub ListLocalSubFolders(ByVal ParentNode As TreeNode, _ ByVal ParentPath As String) ' Add all local subfolders below the passed Local treeview node Dim FolderNode As String = "" Try For Each FolderNode In Directory.GetDirectories(ParentPath) Dim childNode As TreeNode childNode = ParentNode.Nodes.Add(FilenameFromPath(FolderNode)) With childNode .ImageIndex = 0 .SelectedImageIndex = 1 .Tag = FolderNode End With childNode = Nothing Next Catch ex As Exception End Try End Sub Private Sub ComboBox1_SelectedIndexChanged(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles cmbDrives.SelectedIndexChanged End Sub Private Sub lblLocalPath_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles lblLocalPath.Click End Sub Private Sub grpLocalFileSystem_Enter(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles grpLocalFileSystem.Enter End Sub Private Sub btn1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles btn1.Click ' lbl1.Text = End Sub Private Sub ListView1_SelectedIndexChanged(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles ListView1.SelectedIndexChanged End Sub End Class

    Read the article

  • JSF - Updating Model Values in Controller Bean

    - by Sean
    I have a Controller bean (SearchController) that has two managed bean as managed properties (SearchCriteria, SearchResults; both of which are session scoped). When the user hits the find button, the action method that is executed is in SearchController. The SearchCreteria managed bean has a method called search(). This method returns a new SearchResults object. In the controller bean, I am setting the searchResults managed property to be this new SearchResults object. The searchResults object contains what I expect during that request, but the object does not persist in the managed bean. I understand that I am changing what object that searchResults is referencing, but what I don't understand is why JSF isn't updating the model to use the new object. Any ideas what I'm missing or don't understand? I am using JSF 1.1 on WebSphere 6.1. If I put the search method in the SearchResults managed bean, it works.

    Read the article

  • How to save, retrieve and draw an image using postgresql an java (no path saving)?

    - by spderosso
    Hi, Given an object X; I want this object to have an image. The image must be stored in the database. I can't store the path, the actual image must be in the database. My question can be answered by answering the following subquestions: a) What type of field should I put in the database? (e.g VARCHAR) b) What type of object should I use for storing and manipulating the image (at an object layer)? (e.g java.awt.Image) c) How do I create an object of the type selected (answer of question b) from the data obtained from the database? d) How do I save an object of the type selected (answer of question b) to the database? e) How do I draw the image on a web page? I am using postgresql, java and it is a web application. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • C# Type Conversion

    - by PSU_Kardi
    Hi guys, I have two objects. Object A and Object B. Object A is an instance of a class that was generated from several XSD files. Used xsd.exe /c and compiled them. Now I have my new object. I also have a web service, returning something very similar to object A. So right now I have something along the lines of this: WebService.foo myResponseObj = MyService.GetObject(inData); MyFramework.foo myClientObj = new MyFramework.foo(); What I want to do is this myClientObj = (MyFramework.foo)myResponseObj However, it's not really liking this. Says "Cannot implicitly convert MyFramework.foo[] to WebService.foo[] Any ideas on how to resolve this? The object is quite large and they are basically identical.

    Read the article

  • Cannot access data in a xml string

    - by Jess McKenzie
    I am trying to create an array that I can include the perent category Name and the child category Name. I can so far access the below object fine using $xml->Subcategories; but if I try my code below I get an empty array why? PHP: foreach ($catDetailsXml->Category as $value) { $categoryDetails[] = array('CategoryNumber' => $value->Number); } Structure: object(SimpleXMLElement)#13 (1) { ["Category"]=> array(5) { [0]=> object(SimpleXMLElement)#14 (4) { ["Name"]=> string(19) "Commercial Property" ["Number"]=> string(10) "0350-0100-" ["Subcategories"]=> object(SimpleXMLElement)#35 (1) { ["Category"]=> array(3) { [0]=> object(SimpleXMLElement)#36 (4) { ["Name"]=> string(9) "Car parks" ["Number"]=> string(15) "0350-0100-8946-" ["Subcategories"]=> object(SimpleXMLElement)#39 (0) { } }

    Read the article

  • How prevent anyone from stealing my shared_ptr?

    - by Kyle
    So, I use boost::shared_ptr for all the various reference-counting benefits it provides -- reference counting for starters, obviously, but also the ability to copy, assign, and therefore store in STL Containers. The problem is, if I pass it to just one "malicious" function or object, the object can save the ptr and then I'll never be able to de-allocate it without the foreign function or object nicely relinquishing its ownership. Ultimately, I try to keep object ownership explicit. I accomplish this by having the owner keep the only shared_ptr to the object, and "guest" objects only store weak_ptrs to the object. I really don't want the "shared" part of shared_ptr, but I'm required to use shared_ptr in order to make weak_ptrs. I want to use scoped_ptr, but it's extremely limited since you can't copy it. You can't store it in a container, you can't lend out weak_ptrs from it, and you can't transfer ownership to a new manager. What's the solution?

    Read the article

  • Java - Thread safety of ArrayList constructors

    - by andy boot
    I am looking at this piece of code. This constructor delegates to the native method "System.arraycopy" Is it Thread safe? And by that I mean can it ever throw a ConcurrentModificationException? public Collection<Object> getConnections(Collection<Object> someCollection) { return new ArrayList<Object>(someCollection); } Does it make any difference if the collection being copied is ThreadSafe eg a CopyOnWriteArrayList? public Collection<Object> getConnections(CopyOnWriteArrayList<Object> someCollection) { return new ArrayList<Object>(someCollection); }

    Read the article

  • php loop xml data with xsd schema - how do get the data

    - by miholzi
    i try to geht the data from a xml file and i have troubles to get data, for example, how can i get the caaml:locRef value or the caaml:beginPosition value? here is the code so far: /* a big thank you to helderdarocha */ /* – he already helped me yesterday with a part of this code */ $doc = new DOMDocument(); $doc->load('xml/test.xml'); $xpath = new DOMXpath($doc); $xpath->registerNamespace("caaml", "http://caaml.org/Schemas/V5.0/Profiles/BulletinEAWS"); if ($doc->schemaValidate('http://caaml.org/Schemas/V5.0/Profiles/BulletinEAWS/CAAMLv5_BulletinEAWS.xsd')) { foreach ($xpath->query('//caaml:DangerRating') as $key) { echo $key->nodeValue; print_r($key); } } and here ist the print_r from $key DOMElement Object ( [tagName] => caaml:DangerRating [schemaTypeInfo] => [nodeName] => caaml:DangerRating [nodeValue] => 2014-03-03+01:00 2 [nodeType] => 1 [parentNode] => (object value omitted) [childNodes] => (object value omitted) [firstChild] => (object value omitted) [lastChild] => (object value omitted) [previousSibling] => (object value omitted) [nextSibling] => (object value omitted) [attributes] => (object value omitted) [ownerDocument] => (object value omitted) [namespaceURI] => http://caaml.org/Schemas/V5.0/Profiles/BulletinEAWS [prefix] => caaml [localName] => DangerRating [baseURI] => /Applications/MAMP/htdocs/lola/xml/test.xml [textContent] => 2014-03-03+01:00 2 ) 2014-03-04+01:00 2 and here a part of the xml <caaml:DangerRating> <caaml:locRef xlink:href="AT7R1"/> <caaml:validTime> <caaml:TimePeriod> <caaml:beginPosition>2014-03-06T00:00:00+01:00</caaml:beginPosition> <caaml:endPosition>2014-03-06T11:59:59+01:00</caaml:endPosition> </caaml:TimePeriod> </caaml:validTime> <caaml:validElevation> <caaml:ElevationRange uom="m"> <caaml:beginPosition>2200</caaml:beginPosition> </caaml:ElevationRange> </caaml:validElevation> <caaml:mainValue>2</caaml:mainValue> </caaml:DangerRating> <caaml:DangerRating> <caaml:locRef xlink:href="AT7R1"/> <caaml:validTime> <caaml:TimePeriod> thanks!

    Read the article

  • Open an Application .exe window inside another application

    - by jpnavarini
    I have an application in WPF running. I would like that, when a button is clicked inside this application, another application opens, with its window maximized. However, I don't want my first application to stop and wait. I want both to be open and running independently. When the button is clicked again, in case the application is minimized, the application is maximized. In case it is not, it is open again. How is it possible using C#? I have tried the following: Process process = Process.GetProcesses().FirstOrDefault(f => f.ProcessName.Contains("Analysis")); ShowWindow((process ?? Process.Start("..\\..\\..\\MS Analysis\\bin\\Debug\\Chemtech.RT.MS.Analysis.exe")).MainWindowHandle.ToInt32(), SW_MAXIMIZE); But the window does not open, even though the process does start.

    Read the article

  • .NET BinarySearch() on ArrayList of custom objects

    - by Alex
    Hi. I have an ArrayList of custom objects that have the following properties: FileName FilePath CurrentFolder TopLevelFolder I then need to do a BinarySearch (or some other quick search) on the FileName property on all the objects in the ArrayList in .NET. In other words, I need to find the object in the ArrayList with the same FileName as the one I'm searching on. Syntax for the ArrayList's BinarySearch is this; but how do you do this for an object's property in the arraylist? public static void FindMyObject( ArrayList myList, Object myObject ) { int myIndex=myList.BinarySearch( myObject ); if ( myIndex < 0 ) Console.WriteLine( "The object to search for ({0}) is not found. The next larger object is at index {1}.", myObject, ~myIndex ); else Console.WriteLine( "The object to search for ({0}) is at index {1}.", myObject, myIndex ); }

    Read the article

  • JS Variable inside another variable

    - by Tusk
    I have a function that would use other variables, depending on what has been passed. Like this = ActionBar(slot) slot contains "one". and I would like to create a call inside that like object.slot.name but it should convert it before hand to make the command look like object.one.name. Is there a way to do this in javascript/jquery? I remember vaguely that some other language does this as {slot} or something like that. Sorry if this question was already asked, I've checked google and stackoverflow too, but didn't find an answer. Also I'd like to know what's the proper programming term for this kind of variable passing? Edited it cause of misunderstandings. I'm looking into OOP js, so object is an object, one is an object, and name is an attribute, but when passing I'm passing "one" as a string to the function. Tried eval, it doesn't work while dotted with an object.

    Read the article

  • how to query list in powershell

    - by Varyanica
    add-type -Language CSharpVersion3 -TypeDefinition @" public class pack_code { public pack_code() {} public string code { get; set; } public string type { get; set; } } "@ $a = New-Object pack_code $a.code = "3" $a.type = "5" $b = New-Object pack_code $b.code = "2" $b.type = "5" $c = New-Object pack_code $c.code = "2" $c.type = "5" $d = New-Object pack_code $d.code = "1" $d.type = "1" $codes = New-Object 'System.Collections.Generic.List[object]' $codes.add($a) $codes.add($b) $codes.add($c) $codes.add($d) is there a way to select distinct from $codes and select the objects where type equals 1? How can i use linq with PowerShell?

    Read the article

  • Creating and releasing objects in the same method, while using self as delegate

    - by user200341
    In objective-c you are responsible for releasing objects you allocate, but what happens when you allocate an object in a method, assign self as the objects delegate, and then release the object. The callbacks from the newly created (and released) object fails at this point, or rather, doesn't happen. - (void)doSomething { MyObj *myObj = [[MyObj alloc] init]; myObj.delegate = self; [myObj performOperation]; [myObj release]; } - (void)callbackMethodFromMyObj:(NSString *)message { NSLog(message); } I can't release the object until the callback has occurred, and I can't avoid releasing the object in the same method that creates it (because it exists outside the scope). One way of doing it would be to pass the object along in the call-back and release it in the callback, but is this the right way to go about this?

    Read the article

  • Jquery Ajax Request working on Ubuntu but not working on Debian?

    - by MICADO
    I have a strange bug. I develop my application under linux ubuntu. Then i export my project under linux debian for production. I use a classic $.ajax request which return to url ,a json file to parse its content. I created a javascript alert() on the sucess part to see what is returned. Under the developpement version under ubuntu, it's works and i get : [object Object],[object Object],[object Object] Under the production environnement under debian, it's not working and i get my jsonfile content : [ { "cell_line" : "", "id_user" : "2", "public" : "0", },{...},{..} ,etc...] What is going on here? I really don't understand? How the change of platform (ubuntu to debian) can do this??? There is something I am missing.. I'll really appreciate some help on that. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • java overloaded method

    - by Sean Nguyen
    Hi, I have an abstract template method: class abstract MyTemplate { public void something(Object obj) { doSomething(obj) } protected void doSomething(Object obj); } class MyImpl extends MyTemplate { protected void doSomething(Object obj) { System.out.println("i am dealing with generic object"); } protected void doSomething(String str) { System.out.println("I am dealing with string"); } } public static void main(String[] args) { MyImpl impl = new MyImpl(); impl.something("abc"); // --> this return "i am dealing with generic object" } How can I print "I am dealing with string" w/o using instanceof in doSomething(Object obj)? Thanks,

    Read the article

  • Is there a way of getting a file name and inserting into Matlab script?

    - by torr
    In a folder, I have both my .m file that contains the script and an imaging .dcm file that needs to be analyzed. Folder structure: Folder1/analysis.m Folder1/meas_dynamic_123.dcm My script (analysis.m) begins as follows: target =''; <== here should go the full path to the file + filename example: /Volumes/Data/Folder1/meas_dynamic_123.m txt = dir(target); // etc So I'm wondering if there is a way of when running analysis.m it will: automatically search the folder it's in, grab the full path + filename of file containing string dynamic in the name, insert its full path + name into target variable continue running the script Does anyone have any pointers on how to achieve this? Using ffpath?

    Read the article

  • Put an array of Objects in nodes of another array of Objects [JAVA]

    - by zengr
    public class hello { public static void main(String[] args) { Object[] newarray = new Object[1]; Object[] obj = new Object[2]; obj[0] = "Number1"; //string value obj[1] = "Number2"; //string value newarray[0] = obj; //this works Object[] tmp_obj = new Object[2]; tmp_obj = newarray[0]; //obviously does not work System.out.println(tmp_obj[0]); //nope System.out.println(tmp_obj[1]); //nope } } So, now if I want to access the values "Number1" and "Number2" which are stored in obj[0] and obj[1]; obj is in newarray[0]. what should I do? Is this a possible? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Scala importing a file in all files of a package

    - by Core_Dumped
    I need to use an implicit ordering that has been defined in an object in a file abc in the following way: object abc{ implicit def localTimeOrdering: Ordering[LocalDate] = Ordering.fromLessThan(_.isBefore(_)) } So, I make a package object xyz inside a file 'package.scala' that in turn is in the package 'xyz' that has files in which I need the implicit ordering to be applicable. I write something like this: package object xyz{ import abc._ } It does not seem to work. If I manually write the implicit definition statement inside the package object, it works perfectly. What is the correct way to import the object (abc) such that all of its objects/classes/definitions can be used in my entire package 'xyz' ?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292  | Next Page >