Search Results

Search found 764 results on 31 pages for 'deprecated'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 3/31 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • warning C4996: 'getch': The POSIX name for this item is deprecated

    - by Maziah Mohd Zaki
    1c:\users\user\documents\visual studio 2008\projects\bengkel\bengkel\login.cpp(196) : warning C4996: 'getch': The POSIX name for this item is deprecated. Instead, use the ISO C++ conformant name: _getch. See online help for details. 1 c:\program files\microsoft visual studio 9.0\vc\include\conio.h(145) : see declaration of 'getch' 1c:\users\user\documents\visual studio 2008\projects\bengkel\bengkel\login.cpp(199) : warning C4996: 'getch': The POSIX name for this item is deprecated. Instead, use the ISO C++ conformant name: _getch. See online help for details. 1 c:\program files\microsoft visual studio 9.0\vc\include\conio.h(145) : see declaration of 'getch' 1c:\users\user\documents\visual studio 2008\projects\bengkel\bengkel\login.cpp(203) : warning C4065: switch statement contains 'default' but no 'case' labels 1c:\users\user\documents\visual studio 2008\projects\bengkel\bengkel\login.cpp(225) : warning C4996: 'strcpy': This function or variable may be unsafe. Consider using strcpy_s instead. To disable deprecation, use _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS. See online help for details. 1 c:\program files\microsoft visual studio 9.0\vc\include\string.h(74) : see declaration of 'strcpy'

    Read the article

  • How to prevent "parameter PLSQL_DEBUG is deprecated" compiler warning in Oracle SQL Developer

    - by Janek Bogucki
    When I execute a package body DDL statement SQL Developer warns, Warning: PLW-06015: parameter PLSQL_DEBUG is deprecated; use PLSQL_OPTIMIZE_LEVEL=1 How can SQL Developer be configured to not use PLSQL_DEBUG? PLSQL_DEBUG is set to false in an sql*plus session using the same connection details, > show parameters plsql NAME TYPE VALUE ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------ plsql_ccflags string plsql_code_type string INTERPRETED plsql_debug boolean FALSE plsql_native_library_dir string plsql_native_library_subdir_count integer 0 plsql_optimize_level integer 2 plsql_v2_compatibility boolean FALSE plsql_warnings string ENABLE:ALL Oracle SQL Developer v 2.1.1.64 Oracle 11g SE: 11.1.0.6.0

    Read the article

  • Hide deprecated methods from tab completion

    - by Morgoth
    I would like to control which methods appear when a user uses tab-completion on a custom object in ipython - in particular, I want to hide functions that I have deprecated. I still want these methods to be callable, but I don't want users to see them and start using them if they are inspecting the object. Is this something that is possible?

    Read the article

  • setText deprecated

    - by Geo
    Hi there, i saw your comment about getting rid of the setText deprecated error, and using cell.textLabel.text it works perfectly for OS 4.0 but it doesn't work on 3.1.3, the app crashes at the loading screen, have you got any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Is auto_ptr deprecated?

    - by idimba
    Is auto_ptr deprecated in incomming C++ standard? Is unique_ptr should be used for ownershipt transfer instead of share ptr? If unique_ptr is not in standard, than do I need use shared_ptr instead?

    Read the article

  • How to replace the deprecated csc ant task

    - by GrGr
    I have a mixed Java / C# project and use an ant script that contains a csc task to compile the dll. This works, but I get a warning [csc] This task is deprecated and will be removed in a future version [csc] of Ant. It is now part of the .NET Antlib: [csc] http://ant.apache.org/antlibs/dotnet/index.html How can I replace the csc task? I can surely create an exec task calling nant with a project.build file, but that feels completely wrong.

    Read the article

  • Replacing deprecated <:< Manifest type witness in Scala 2.10

    - by Josh
    Can someone point me at what I should be doing under scala 2.10 in place of this deprecated type witness on Manifest? reflect.ClassManifest.singleType(foo) <:< barManifest Honestly, my goal here is just to replace it with something that doesn't raise a deprecation warning. I'm happy to use the new reflection API. Here's the code in question in context, if that's important: https://github.com/azavea/geotrellis/blob/master/src/main/scala/geotrellis/feature/op/geometry/geometry.scala#L45

    Read the article

  • Why was std::strstream deprecated?

    - by andand
    I recently discovered that std::strstream has been deprecated in favor of std::stringstream. It's been a while since I've needed it, but it was useful in its way for what I needed to do at the time. My question is why was this decision made, and what benefits does std::stringstream provide that are absent from std::strstream?

    Read the article

  • Why is Private Accessor deprecated?

    - by user3918598
    It used to be the number one reason for us to choose MSTest from others that we could access and test private methods. Now that Private accessors are deprecated in Visual Studio 2012. Does anyone know why Microsoft make such decision? Is it because it's not a good practice to test private methods? Also, if I still need to unit test my private methods, how could I do that in VS 2012 and later versions?

    Read the article

  • Deprecated vs. Denigrated in JavaDoc?

    - by jschoen
    In the JavaDoc for X509Certificate getSubjectDN() it states: Denigrated, replaced by getSubjectX500Principal(). I am used to seeing Deprecated in the for methods that should not be used any longer, but not Denigrated. I found a bug report about this particular case where it was closed with comment: This isn't a bug. "Deprecated" is meant to be used only in serious cases. When we are using a method that is Deprecated, the general suggested action is to stop using the method. So what is the suggested action when a method is marked as Denigrated?

    Read the article

  • GEM Version Requirements Deprecated

    - by Kevin Sylvestre
    When creating a new Rails project using: rails sample Then creating a model using: script/generate model person first_name:string last_name:string Everything is fine. However, if I add any gems to my environment.rb: config.gem "authlogic" And run the same generator, I get the following: /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/gem_dependency.rb:119:Warning: Gem::Dependency#version_requirements is deprecated and will be removed on or after August 2010. The warning just recently appeared (I think), but I would like to fix it if possible. Any hints or similar experiences? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Is the JavaScript RegExp implicit method deprecated?

    - by Eric
    So everyone knows what I mean by "implicit methods"? They're like those default properties from the Windows COM days of yore, where you could type something like val = obj(arguments) and it would be interpreted as val = obj.defaultMethod(arguments) I just found out JavaScript has the same thing: the default method of a RegExp object appears to be 'exec', as in /(\w{4})/('yip jump man')[1] ==> jump This even works when the RegExp object is assigned to a variable, and even when it's created with the RegExp constructor, instead of /.../, which is good news to us fans of referential transparency. Where is this documented, and/or is it deprecated?

    Read the article

  • Deprecated Preference Activity method

    - by Adnan Nazir
    package com.adi.preferencedemotest; i am working on PreferenceActivity but when i call my preference xml(prefs.xml) with the help of addPreferencesFromResource it says this method is deprecated and "This function is not relevant for a modern fragment-based PreferenceActivity" is there any alternative of this method? how i can handle ? public class PrefsActivity extends PreferenceActivity { @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") <------- @Override protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); addPreferencesFromResource(R.xml.prefs); <------- } } Note: may be my question rate as duplicated but i didn't find any.

    Read the article

  • F# Class with Generics : 'constructor deprecated' error

    - by akaphenom
    I am trying to create a a class that will store a time series of data - organized by groups, but I had some compile errors so I stripped down to the basics (just a simple instantiation) and still can't overcome the compile error. I was hoping some one may have seen this issue before. Clas is defined as: type TimeSeriesQueue<'V, 'K when 'K: comparison> = class val private m_daysInCache: int val private m_cache: Map<'K, 'V list ref > ref; val private m_getKey: ('V -> 'K) ; private new(getKey) = { m_cache = ref Map.empty m_daysInCache = 7 ; m_getKey = getKey ; } end So that looks OK to me (it may not be, but doesnt have any errors or warnings) - the instantiation gets the error: type tempRec = { someKey: string ; someVal1: int ; someVal2: int ; } let keyFunc r:tempRec = r.someKey // error occurs on the following line let q = new TimeSeriesQueue<tempRec, string> keyFunc This construct is deprecated: The use of the type syntax 'int C' and 'C ' is not permitted here. Consider adjusting this type to be written in the form 'C' NOTE This may be simple stupidity - I am just getting back from holiday and my brain is still on time zone lag...

    Read the article

  • Using deprecated binders and C++0x lambdas

    - by Sumant
    C++0x has deprecated the use of old binders such as bind1st and bind2nd in favor of generic std::bind. C++0x lambdas bind nicely with std::bind but they don't bind with classic bind1st and bind2nd because by default lambdas don't have nested typedefs such as argument_type, first_argument_type, second_argument_type, and result_type. So I thought std::function can serve as a standard way to bind lambdas to the old binders because it exposes the necessary typedefs. However, using std::function is hard to use in this context because it forces you to spell out the function-type while instantiating it. auto bound = std::bind1st(std::function<int (int, int)>([](int i, int j){ return i < j; }), 10); // hard to use auto bound = std::bind1st(std::make_function([](int i, int j){ return i < j; }), 10); // nice to have but does not compile. I could not find a convenient object generator for std::function. Something like std::make_fuction would be nice to have. Does such a thing exist? If not, is there any other better way of binding lamdas to the classic binders?

    Read the article

  • Most efficient way of checking if Date object and Calendar object are in the same month

    - by Indigenuity
    I am working on a project that will run many thousands of comparisons between dates to see if they are in the same month, and I am wondering what the most efficient way of doing it would be. This isn't exactly what my code looks like, but here's the gist: List<Date> dates = getABunchOfDates(); Calendar month = Calendar.getInstance(); for(int i = 0; i < numMonths; i++) { for(Date date : dates) { if(sameMonth(month, date) .. doSomething } month.add(Calendar.MONTH, -1); } Creating a new Calendar object for every date seems like a pretty hefty overhead when this comparison will happen thousands of times, soI kind of want to cheat a bit and use the deprecated method Date.getMonth() and Date.getYear() public static boolean sameMonth(Calendar month, Date date) { return month.get(Calendar.YEAR) == date.getYear() && month.get(Calendar.MONTH) == date.getMonth(); } I'm pretty close to just using this method, since it seems to be the fastest, but is there a faster way? And is this a foolish way, since the Date methods are deprecated? Note: This project will always run with Java 7

    Read the article

  • Deprecate in Java 1.6

    - by iano
    In Java 1.5, to deprecate a method you would: @Deprecated int foo(int bar) { } Compiling this in Java 1.6 results in the following: Syntax error, annotations are only available if source level is 1.5 Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Should I continue reading Frank Luna's Introduction to 3D Game Programming with DirectX 11 book after D3DX and XNA Math Library have been deprecated? [on hold]

    - by milindsrivastava1997
    I recently started learning DirectX 11 (C++) by reading Frank Luna's Introduction to 3D Game Programming with DirectX 11. In that the author uses D3DX and XNA Math Library. Since they have been deprecated should I continue using that book? If yes, should I use the deprecated libraries or should I switch some other libraries? If no, which book should I consult for up-to-date content with no use of deprecated library? Thanks!

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >