Search Results

Search found 456 results on 19 pages for 'getter'.

Page 3/19 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Java nullPointerException with getter and setters on an object

    - by 12345
    I'm getting a nullPointerException below. Can someone explain why? Thanks! private SpatialPooler spatialPooler; private Region region; private Column column33; public void setUp() { this.spatialPooler = new SpatialPooler(); this.region = new Region(30, 40, 6, 8, 1.0f, 1, 1); this.column33 = this.region.getColumn(3, 3); } public void addActiveColumn(Column activeColumn) { this.activeColumns.add(activeColumn); // nullPointerException here! } public Column getActiveColumn(int x, int y) { for (Column activeColumn : this.activeColumns) { if (activeColumn.getX() == x && activeColumn.getY() == y) { return activeColumn; } } return null; } // in a test class that is in the same package. public void testGetAndAddActiveColumn() { this.spatialPooler.addActiveColumn(this.column33); assertNull(this.spatialPooler.getActiveColumn(3, 3)); this.column33.setActiveState(true); assertEquals(this.column33, this.spatialPooler.getActiveColumn(3, 3)); }

    Read the article

  • How to deal with elimination of duplicate logic vs. cost of complexity increase?

    - by Gabriel
    I just wrote some code that is very representative of a recurring theme (in my coding world lately): repeated logic leads to an instinct to eliminate duplication which results in something that is more complex the tradeoff seems wrong to me (the examples of the negative side aren't worth posting - but this is probably the 20th console utility I've written in the past 12 months). I'm curious if I'm missing some techniques or if this is really just on of those "experience tells you when to do what" type of issues. Here's the code... I'm tempted to leave it as is, even though there will be about 20 of those if-blocks when I'm done. static void Main(string[] sargs) { try { var urls = new DirectTrackRestUrls(); var restCall = new DirectTrackRestCall(); var logger = new ConsoleLogger(); Args args = (Args)Enum.Parse(typeof(Args), string.Join(",", sargs)); if (args.HasFlag(Args.Campaigns)) { var getter = new ResourceGetter(logger, urls.ListAdvertisers, restCall); restCall.UriVariables.Add("access_id", 1); getter.GotResource += new ResourceGetter.GotResourceEventHandler(getter_GotResource); getter.GetResources(); SaveResources(); } if (args.HasFlag(Args.Advertisers)) { var getter = new ResourceGetter(logger, urls.ListAdvertisers, restCall); restCall.UriVariables.Add("access_id", 1); getter.GotResource += new ResourceGetter.GotResourceEventHandler(getter_GotResource); getter.GetResources(); SaveResources(); } if (args.HasFlag(Args.CampaignGroups)) { var getter = new ResourceGetter(logger, urls.ListCampaignGroups, restCall); getter.GotResource += new ResourceGetter.GotResourceEventHandler(getter_GotResource); getter.GetResources(); SaveResources(); } } catch (Exception e) { Console.WriteLine(e.InnerException); Console.WriteLine(e.StackTrace); }

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET C# Application Object Getters and Setters

    - by kellax
    I have had a hard time finiding a newbie friendly example of accessing Application Object. I have few things ( arrays ) i would like to store in Application Object to keep as persistant data for about 2h till AppRecycle Anyhow i know how to set an Application Object variable this way: // One way String[] users = new String[1000]; Application["users"] = users; // Another way Application.Add("users", users); However i do not know how to access these variables once in Application Object there is a Getter method Get however it requires int index and other one Contents which get's everything. Here i try to retrive my String[] array but gives me a error that i am trying to convert Object to String. String[] usersTable = Application["users"]; // Since this is an object i also tried Application.users but gives error

    Read the article

  • The use of getters and setters for different programming languages [closed]

    - by leonhart88
    So I know there are a lot of questions on getters and setters in general, but I couldn't find something exactly like my question. I was wondering if people change the use of get/set depending on different languages. I started learning with C++ and was taught to use getters and setters. This is what I understand: In C++ (and Java?), a variable can either be public or private, but we cannot have a mix. For example, I can't have a read-only variable that can still be changed inside the class. It's either all public (can read and change it), or all private (can't read and can only change inside the class). Because of this (and possibly other reasons), we use getters and setters. In MATLAB, I can control the "setaccess" and "getaccess" properties of variables, so that I can make things read-only (can directly access the property, but can't overwrite it). In this case, I don't feel like I need a getter because I can just do class.property. Also, in Python it is considered "Pythonic" to not use getters/setters and to only put things into properties if needed. I don't really understand why its OK to have all public variables in Python, because that's opposite of what I learned when I started with C++. I'm just curious what other people's thoughts are on this. Would you use getters and setters for all languages? Would you only use it for C++/Java and do direct access in MATLAB and Python (which is what I am currently doing)? Is the second option considered bad? For my purposes, I am only referring to simple getters and setters (just return/set the value and do not do anything else). Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Architecture or Pattern for handling properties with custom setter/getter?

    - by Shelby115
    Current Situation: I'm doing a simple MVC site for keeping journals as a personal project. My concern is I'm trying to keep the interaction between the pages and the classes simplistic. Where I run into issues is the password field. My setter encrypts the password, so the getter retrieves the encrypted password. public class JournalBook { private IEncryptor _encryptor { get; set; } private String _password { get; set; } public Int32 id { get; set; } public String name { get; set; } public String description { get; set; } public String password { get { return this._password; } set { this.setPassword(this._password, value, value); } } public List<Journal> journals { get; set; } public DateTime created { get; set; } public DateTime lastModified { get; set; } public Boolean passwordProtected { get { return this.password != null && this.password != String.Empty; } } ... } I'm currently using model-binding to submit changes or create new JournalBooks (like below). The problem arises that in the code below book.password is always null, I'm pretty sure this is because of the custom setter. [HttpPost] public ActionResult Create(JournalBook book) { // Create the JournalBook if not null. if (book != null) this.JournalBooks.Add(book); return RedirectToAction("Index"); } Question(s): Should I be handling this not in the property's getter/setter? Is there a pattern or architecture that allows for model-binding or another simple method when properties need to have custom getters/setters to manipulate the data? To summarize, how can I handle the password storing with encryption such that I have the following, Robust architecture I don't store the password as plaintext. Submitting a new or modified JournalBook is as easy as default model-binding (or close to it).

    Read the article

  • Javascript setters/getters

    - by Martin Hansen
    var author = { firstname: 'Martin', lastname: 'Hansen' } function settersGetters(propStr) { for (var i = 0; i < propStr.length; i++) { author['_'+ propStr[i]] = null; author.__defineGetter__(propStr[i], function() { return author['_'+ propStr[i]]; }); author.__defineSetter__(propStr[i], function(val) { author['_'+ propStr[i]] = val; }); }; } The above code would hopefully generate setters/getters for any supplied properties (in an array) for the object author. But when I call the below code Both firstname and lastname is olsen.. What am I doing wrong? settersGetters(['firstname', 'lastname']); author.firstname = 'per'; author.lastname = 'olsen'; console.log(author.firstname); console.log(author.lastname);

    Read the article

  • Computation overhead in C# - Using getters/setters vs. modifying arrays directly and casting speeds

    - by Jeffrey Kern
    I was going to write a long-winded post, but I'll boil it down here: I'm trying to emulate the graphical old-school style of the NES via XNA. However, my FPS is SLOW, trying to modify 65K pixels per frame. If I just loop through all 65K pixels and set them to some arbitrary color, I get 64FPS. The code I made to look-up what colors should be placed where, I get 1FPS. I think it is because of my object-orented code. Right now, I have things divided into about six classes, with getters/setters. I'm guessing that I'm at least calling 360K getters per frame, which I think is a lot of overhead. Each class contains either/and-or 1D or 2D arrays containing custom enumerations, int, Color, or Vector2D, bytes. What if I combined all of the classes into just one, and accessed the contents of each array directly? The code would look a mess, and ditch the concepts of object-oriented coding, but the speed might be much faster. I'm also not concerned about access violations, as any attempts to get/set the data in the arrays will done in blocks. E.g., all writing to arrays will take place before any data is accessed from them. As for casting, I stated that I'm using custom enumerations, int, Color, and Vector2D, bytes. Which data types are fastest to use and access in the .net Framework, XNA, XBox, C#? I think that constant casting might be a cause of slowdown here. Also, instead of using math to figure out which indexes data should be placed in, I've used precomputed lookup tables so I don't have to use constant multiplication, addition, subtraction, division per frame. :)

    Read the article

  • using empty on inaccessible object with __isset and __get

    - by David
    <?php class Magic_Methods { protected $meta; public function __construct() { $this->meta = (object) array( 'test' => 1 ); } public function __isset($name) { echo "pass isset {$name} \n"; return isset($this->$name); } public function __get($name) { echo "pass get {$name} \n"; return $this->$name; } } $mm = new Magic_Methods(); $meta = empty($mm->meta->notExisting); var_dump($meta); echo "||\n"; $meta = empty($mm->meta); var_dump($meta); The snippet above does not work as expected for me. Why would the first empty() ommit the __isset? I get this: pass get meta bool(true) || pass isset meta pass get meta bool(false) I would expected identical results or another pass at the __isset, but not a direct call to __get. Or am I missing something here?

    Read the article

  • If a variable has getter and setter, should it be public?

    - by Oni
    I am an about to graduate Computer Science student so probably this is a stupid question. If I have a class with a variable that is private and the class have getter and setter for that variable. Why don't make that variable public? The only case I think you have to use getters and setters is if you need to do some operation besides the set or the get. Example: void my_class::set_variable(int x){ /* Some operation like updating a log */ this->variable = x; } Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • How do you do an assignment of a delegate to a delegate in .NET

    - by Seth Spearman
    Hello... I just go the answer on how to pass a generic delegate as a parameter. Thanks for the help. Now I need to know how to ASSIGN the delegate to another delegate declarartion. Can this be done? Public Class MyClass Public Delegate Function Getter(Of TResult)() As TResult ''#the following code works. Public Shared Sub MyMethod(Of TResult)(ByVal g As Getter(Of TResult)) ' I want to assign Getter = g 'how do you do it. End Sub End Class Notice that Getter is now private. How can I ASSIGN Getter = G When I try Getter = g 'I get too few type arguments compile error. When I try Getter(Of TResult) = g 'I get Getter is a type and cannot be used as an expression. How do you do it? Seth

    Read the article

  • How do you do an assignment of a delegate to a delegate in .NET 2.0

    - by Seth Spearman
    Hello... I just go the answer on how to pass a generic delegate as a parameter. Thanks for the help. Now I need to know how to ASSIGN the delegate to another delegate declarartion. Can this be done? Public Class MyClass Public Delegate Function Getter(Of TResult)() As TResult ''#the following code works. Public Shared Sub MyMethod(Of TResult)(ByVal g As Getter(Of TResult)) ''# I want to assign Getter = g ''#how do you do it. End Sub End Class Notice that Getter is now private. How can I ASSIGN Getter = G When I try Getter = g 'I get too few type arguments compile error. When I try Getter(Of TResult) = g 'I get Getter is a type and cannot be used as an expression. How do you do it? Seth

    Read the article

  • Does Hibernate always need a setter when there is a getter?

    - by Marcus
    We have some Hibernate getter methods annotated with both @Column and @Basic. We get an exception if we don't have the corresponding setter. Why is this? In our case we are deriving the value returned from the getter (to get stored in the DB) and the setter has no functional purpose. So we just have an empty method to get around the error condition..

    Read the article

  • beginning oop php question: do constructors take the place of getter?

    - by Joel
    I'm working through this tutorial: http://www.killerphp.com/tutorials/object-oriented-php/php-objects-page-3.php At first he has you create a setter and getter method in the class: <?php class person{ var $name; function set_name($new_name){ $this->name=$new_name; } function get_name(){ return $this->name; } } php?> And then you create the object and echo the results: <?php $stefan = new person(); $jimmy = new person(); $stefan ->set_name("Stefan Mischook"); $jimmy ->set_name("Nick Waddles"); echo "The first Object name is: ".$stefan->get_name(); echo "The second Object name is: ".$jimmy->get_name(); ?> Works as expected, and I understand. Then he introduces constructors: class person{ var $name; function __construct($persons_name) { $this->name = $persons_name; } function set_name($new_name){ $this->name=$new_name; } function get_name(){ return $this->name; } } And returns like so: <?php $joel = new person("Joel"); echo "The third Object name is: ".$joel->get_name(); ?> This is all fine and makes sense. Then I tried to combine the two and got an error, so I'm curious-is a constructor always taking the place of a "get" function? If you have a constructor, do you always need to include an argument when creating an object? Gives errors: <?php $stefan = new person(); $jimmy = new person(); $joel = new person("Joel Laviolette"); $stefan ->set_name("Stefan Mischook"); $jimmy ->set_name("Nick Waddles"); echo "The first Object name is: ".$stefan->get_name(); echo "The second Object name is: ".$jimmy->get_name(); echo "The third Object name is: ".$joel->get_name(); ?>

    Read the article

  • Naming boolean field that is a verb

    - by dnhang
    In Java, by convention getter and setter for boolean fields will be isField() and setField(). This works perfectly fine with field names that are adjectives like active, visible, closed, etc. But how do I name a field that has meaning of a verb, like haveChildren? Add _ing to the verb (havingChildren), maybe? Edit: to clarify, I don't have control of the method names (getter and setter), they are auto-generated by the IDE. So what I need is an appropriate field name so that when the IDE generate a getter for it, it make senses. For example, hasChildren is a perfect field name, but when the IDE generate the getter for the field it would be isHasChildren. How do I solve this?

    Read the article

  • IKVM complex custom type error in remapping to properties!

    - by manishKungwani
    hi, I used the above and wrote this: <class name="umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Stop"> <property name="StopName" sig="()Ljava.lang.String;"> <getter name="getName" sig="()Ljava.lang.String;" /> <setter name="setName" sig="(Ljava.lang.String;)Z" /> </property> <property name="StopId" sig="()I"> <getter name="getStopId" sig="()I" /> <setter name="setStopId" sig="(I)V" /> </property> </class> <class name="umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Line"> <property name="LineName" sig="()Ljava.lang.String;"> <getter name="getName" sig="()Ljava.lang.String;" /> <setter name="setName" sig="(Ljava.lang.String;)V" /> </property> <property name="LineId" sig="()I"> <getter name="getLineId" sig="()I" /> <setter name="setLineId" sig="(I)V" /> </property> <property name="FirstEndStop" sig="()umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Stop;"> <getter name="getFirstEndStop" sig="()umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Stop;" /> <setter name="setFirstEndStop" sig="(umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Stop;)Z" / / / I get an error while generating the dll file: D:\PTS\PTS_SVN\Libraries\ikvm-0.44.0.5\binikvmc -remap:map.xml -target:library PTSDomain.jar Note IKVMC0002: output file is "PTSDomain.dll" Error: Invalid property signature '()umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Stop;' in rem ap file for property umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Line.FirstEndStop Error: Invalid property getter signature '()umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Stop;' in remap file for property umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Line.FirstEndStop Error: Invalid property setter signature '(umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Stop;)Z ' in remap file for property umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Line.FirstEndStop Error: Invalid property signature '()umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Stop;' in rem ap file for property umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Line.SecondEndStop Error: Invalid property getter signature '()umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Stop;' in remap file for property umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Line.SecondEndStop Error: Invalid property setter signature '(umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Stop;)Z ' in remap file for property umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Line.SecondEndStop Error: Invalid property signature '()[umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Stop;' in re map file for property umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Line.Stops Error: Invalid property getter signature '()[umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Stop; ' in remap file for property umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Line.Stops Error: Invalid property setter signature '([umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Stop;) Z' in remap file for property umple.pts.domain.coreEntities.Line.Stops D:\PTS\PTS_SVN\Libraries\ikvm-0.44.0.5\bin Can i use the custom properties or will i have to do that via some other way??

    Read the article

  • Is there any benefit to declaring a private property with a getter and setter?

    - by AmoebaMan17
    I am reviewing another developer's code and he has written a lot of code for class level variables that is similar to the following: /// <summary> /// how often to check for messages /// </summary> private int CheckForMessagesMilliSeconds { get; set; } /// <summary> /// application path /// </summary> private string AppPath { get; set; } Doesn't coding this way add unnecessary overhead since the variable is private? Am I not considering a situation where this pattern of coding is required for private variables?

    Read the article

  • xcode - warning there's no getter/setter for property not even mentioned in the code!!

    - by alexeyndru
    I got the warning : property 'textField' requires method '-textField' to be defined - use @synthesize, @dynamic or provide a method implementation. Now, there is no such property defined in my project! More bizarre, if I just click save in Interface builder and build again, the build is successful - though, right on the line with '@end' the warning appears. Also weird: if I begin to write some code ..and then delete it just the way it was before writing it (maybe not code..anything) and then build&go the warning with the textField appears again. Could be a bug of sdk? What could be happening?

    Read the article

  • How do I access abstract private data from derived class without friend or 'getter' functions in C++?

    - by John
    So, I am caught up in a dilemma right now. How am I suppose to access a pure abstract base class private member variable from a derived class? I have heard from a friend that it is possible to access it through the base constructor, but he didn't explain. How is it possible? There are some inherited classes from base class. Is there any way to gain access to the private variables ? class Base_button { private: bool is_vis; Rect rButton; public: // Constructors Base_button(); Base_button( const Point &corner, double height, double width ); // Destructor virtual ~ Base_button(); // Accessors virtual void draw() const = 0; bool clicked( const Point &click ) const; bool is_visible() const; // Mutators virtual void show(); virtual void hide(); void move( const Point &loc ); }; class Button : public Base_button { private: Message mButton; public: // Constructors Button(); Button( const Point &corner, const string &label ); // Acessors virtual void draw() const; // Mutators virtual void show(); virtual void hide(); }; I want to be able access Rect and bool in the base class from the subclass

    Read the article

  • Which one is better to have auto-implemented property with private setter or private field and property just getter?

    - by PLB
    My question may be a part of an old topic - "properties vs fields". I have situation where variable is read-only for outside class but needs to modified inside a class. I can approach it in 2 ways: First: private Type m_Field; public Type MyProperty { get { return m_Field; } } Second: public Type MyProperty { get; private set; } After reading several articles (that mostly covered benefits of using public properties instead of public fields) I did not get idea if the second method has some advantage over the first one but writing less code. I am interested which one will be better practice to use in projects (and why) or it's just a personal choice. Maybe this question does not belong to SO so I apologize in advance.

    Read the article

  • Is a Critical Section around an integer getter and setter redundant?

    - by Tim Gradwell
    Do critical sections inside trivial int accessors actually do anything useful? int GetFoo() { CriticalSection(crit_id); return foo; } void SetFoo(int value) { CriticalSection(crit_id); foo = value; } Is it possible for two threads to be attempting to read and write foo simultaneously? I'd have thought 'no' unless integers are written byte-at-a-time, in which case I can see the use. But I'd have though modern cpus would read/write integers in a single atomic action...

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >