Search Results

Search found 22162 results on 887 pages for 'limit size'.

Page 3/887 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Using the LIMIT statement in a SQLite query

    - by anselmophil
    Hi guys. I have a query that selects rows in a ListView without having a limit. But now that i have implemented a SharedPreferences that the user can select how much rows will be displayed in the ListView, my SQLite query doesnt work. Im passing the argument this way: return wDb.query(TABELANOME, new String[] {IDTIT, TAREFATIT, SUMARIOTIT}, CONCLUIDOTIT + "=1", null, null, null, null, "LIMIT='" + limite + "'"); Help, please!

    Read the article

  • passing LIMIT as parameters to MySQL sproc

    - by Kyle
    I'm creating a paging class and need to pass in two parameters to my MySQL stored procedure for the LIMIT clause. I'm passing them in as INTs and trying something like this SELECT * FROM `MyTable` LIMIT MyFirstParamInt, MySecondParamInt it gives me an error when I try and save the sproc though. Is there a way to do this that I'm just missing? Or am I going to have to EVAL the whole query and EXECUTE it?

    Read the article

  • Is it the address bus size or the data bus size that determines "8-bit , 16-bit ,32-bit ,64-bit " systems?

    - by learner
    My simple understanding is as follows. Memory (RAM) is composed of bits, groups of 8 which form bytes, each of which can be addressed ,and hence byte addressable memory. Address Bus stores the location of a byte of memory. If an address bus is of size 32 bits, that means it can hold upto 232 numbers and it hence can refer upto 232 bytes of memory = 4GB of memory and any memory greater than that is useless. Data bus is used to send the value to be written to/read off the memory. If I have a data bus of size 32 bits, it means a maximum of 4 bytes can be written to/read off the memory at a time. I find no relation between this size and the maximum memory size possible. But I read here that: Even though most systems are byte-addressable, it makes sense for the processor to move as much data around as possible. This is done by the data bus, and the size of the data bus is where the names 8-bit system, 16-bit system, 32-bit system, 64-bit system, etc.. come from. When the data bus is 8 bits wide, it can transfer 8 bits in a single memory operation. When the data bus is 32 bits wide (as is most common at the time of writing), at most, 32 bits can be moved in a single memory operation. This says that the size of the data bus is what gives an OS the name, 8bit, 16bit and so on. What is wrong with my understanding?

    Read the article

  • Trying to unpack 2.5GB .tar.gz file on Linux but getting "An error occurred while trying to open the archive"

    - by TMM
    Hi, Is there a limit on Linux for the file size of a .tar.gz (or its contents). I am currently creating a .tar.gz (both through the UI/"Compress As" and also through the command line) file for 2 files (6GB and 2GB), and even though it is created successfully, when I try to unpack it using Ark it throws the error "An error occurred while trying to open the archive". I have seen some places that it might be better to archive the file into several smaller .tar.gz files, but I was wondering exactly how to do this (and subsequently unpack the files). Also, is it totally impossible to use the 1 .tar.gz file approach as this would be much simpler. Thanks in advance, Tim

    Read the article

  • Pushing new mailbox limits for Exchange 2003 accounts

    - by Dobler
    There is this problem that I have every time I set up an account for a user on Exchange 2003. After I update the Mailbox limit to unlimited in the Exchange tab in the user preferences it does not seem to update right away. I remember reading somewhere that it takes several hours for the change to update in the database. I also remember typing in some terminal command that pushed the new updates immediately. What is that command, and why is it so difficult to find the answer to this problem on Google?

    Read the article

  • how to limit network bandwidth for testing (win7, virtualbox)

    - by bao
    Hi! I develop ASP.NET application on Windows 7 machine (IIS 7.5). I need to limit network bandwidth to test my AJAX GUI. What kind of software could you recommend for those cases: a) I deploy my app to the remote IIS box and try to limit bandwidth of my network connection in Windows 7. b) I deploy my app to the IIS installed on Win7 and try to test my app from Virtualbox machine via virtual network. So, any opinions?

    Read the article

  • MYSQL - Group by limit

    - by jono2010
    Hello Is there a simple way to LIMIT the GROUP BY results to the top 2. The following query returns all the results. Using 'LIMIT 2' reduces the overall list to the top 2 entries only. select distinct(rating_name), id_markets, sum(rating_good) 'good', sum(rating_neutral)'neutral', sum(rating_bad) 'bad' from ratings where rating_year=year(curdate()) and rating_week= week(curdate(),1) group by rating_name,id_markets order by rating_name, sum(rating_good) desc Results in the following :- poland 78 48 24 12 <- keep poland 1 15 5 0 <- keep poland 23 12 6 3 poland 2 5 0 0 poland 3 0 5 0 poland 4 0 0 5 ireland 1 9 3 0 <- keep ireland 2 3 0 0 <- keep ireland 3 0 3 0 ireland 4 0 0 3 france 12 24 12 6 <- keep france 1 3 1 0 <- keep france 231 1 0 0 france 2 1 0 0 france 4 0 0 1 france 3 0 1 0 Thanks Jon

    Read the article

  • MYSQL and the LIMIT clause

    - by Lizard
    I was wondering if adding a LIMIT 1 to a query would speed up the processing? For example... I have a query that will most of the time return 1 result, but will occasionaly return 10's, 100's or even 1000's of records. But I will only ever want the first record. Would the limit 1 speed things up or make no difference? I know I could use GROUP BY to return 1 result but that would just add more computation. Any thoughts gladly accepted! Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to limit results by SUM

    - by superspace
    I have a table of events called event. For the purpose of this question it only has one field called date. The following query returns me a number of events that are happening on each date for the next 14 days: SELECT DATE_FORMAT( ev.date, '%Y-%m-%d' ) as short_date, count(*) as date_count FROM event ev WHERE ev.date >= NOW() GROUP BY short_date ORDER BY ev.start_date ASC LIMIT 14 The result could be as follows: +------------+------------+ | short_date | date_count | +------------+------------+ | 2010-03-14 | 1 | | 2010-03-15 | 2 | | 2010-03-16 | 9 | | 2010-03-17 | 8 | | 2010-03-18 | 11 | | 2010-03-19 | 14 | | 2010-03-20 | 13 | | 2010-03-21 | 7 | | 2010-03-22 | 2 | | 2010-03-23 | 3 | | 2010-03-24 | 3 | | 2010-03-25 | 6 | | 2010-03-26 | 23 | | 2010-03-27 | 14 | +------------+------------+ 14 rows in set (0.06 sec) Let's say I want to dislay these events by date. At the same time I only want to display a maximum of 10 at a time. How would I do this? Somehow I need to limit this result by the SUM of the date_count field but I do not know how. Anybody run into this problem before? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Folder Size Column on Explorer on Windows Vista/Seven

    - by Click Ok
    I'm a big fan of FolderSize, but unfortunately it works only on Windows XP. Even reading this and this, I'm not convinced that I cannot to have a column showing the folder size on Windows Explorer. Even with all "problems" FolderSize worked like a charm in WindowsXP. In a sysadmin life, FolderSize is explendid. Before select a lot of folders to send to backup in DVDs, I can check directly in Windows Explorer the size of the folders and get a set of folders with 4.3Gb to burn in a DVD. In another situation, I can view in the root folder the size of the bigger folders in the hard drive and start a good strategy of backup/partitioning/transfer to another drive/etc. If desired, I can tell a lot of another needs that in my sysadmin life I need a tool like FolderSize... There is someone that is actively developing a solution to show folder size on Windows Explorer in Vista/Seven Windows? What the problems that I can face if I develop myself that "add-in" for Windows Explorer?

    Read the article

  • MYSQL LIMIT not working as expected - Java

    - by Sirish
    I have this weird problem in java when trying to fetch records from MYSql database by using the limit function in the query. Not sure what went wrong or did wrong, this query is giving me a hard time. Issue - When I run this query through my java program it returns all the records and not limiting the records to 10 as given in the limit. The same query when ran in MYSql command line, it execute very well and fetches me only 10 recrods. Below is the java code and query. Any help or support is appreciated.! Java code - public UserVO getApplUserDetailsList(UserVO userVO) throws CAPDAOException { List<UserVO> returnList = null; String methodName = "getApplUserDetails()"; Session session = null; String queryString = null; Transaction transaction = null; PreparedStatement ps = null; ResultSet rs = null; if(userVO == null) { logger.writeToTivoliAlertLog(className, CAPConstants.ERROR, methodName, null, "userVO returned null. Busines validation error.!", null); throw new CAPDAOException("userVO returned null. Busines validation error.!",CAPException.BUSINESS_VALIDATION_ERROR_SECURITY); } try { returnList = new ArrayList<UserVO>(); System.out.println(""); String appusr = userVO.getAppUsrNm(); session = getSession(); transaction = session.beginTransaction(); if(userVO.getAppUsrRoleCd()!=null && !userVO.getAppUsrRoleCd().trim().equalsIgnoreCase(CAPConstants.DEFAULT_DROPDOWN_VALUE)){ queryString = "SELECT " + "APPL_USR_ID,APPL_USR_NM,APPL_USR_FRST_NM, " + "APPL_USR_LST_NM,ACCESS_ROLE_CD " + "FROM APPL_USR " + "WHERE " + "APPL_USR_NM LIKE ?"+ " AND APPL_USR_FRST_NM LIKE ?"+ " AND APPL_USR_LST_NM LIKE ?"+ " AND ACCESS_ROLE_CD = ?"+ " AND APPL_USR_ID != ?"; ps = session.connection().prepareStatement(queryString); ps.setString(1,userVO.getAppUsrNm()+CAPConstants.PERCENTILE_SYMBOL); ps.setString(2,userVO.getAppUsrFirstNm()+CAPConstants.PERCENTILE_SYMBOL); ps.setString(3,userVO.getAppUsrLastNm()+CAPConstants.PERCENTILE_SYMBOL); ps.setString(4,userVO.getAppUsrRoleCd()); ps.setInt(5, 1); } else { queryString = "SELECT " + "APPL_USR_ID,APPL_USR_NM,APPL_USR_FRST_NM, " + "APPL_USR_LST_NM,ACCESS_ROLE_CD " + "FROM APPL_USR " + "WHERE " + "APPL_USR_NM LIKE ?"+ " AND APPL_USR_FRST_NM LIKE ?"+ " AND APPL_USR_LST_NM LIKE ?"+ " AND APPL_USR_ID != ?"; ps = session.connection().prepareStatement(queryString); ps.setString(1,userVO.getAppUsrNm()+CAPConstants.PERCENTILE_SYMBOL); ps.setString(2,userVO.getAppUsrFirstNm()+CAPConstants.PERCENTILE_SYMBOL); ps.setString(3,userVO.getAppUsrLastNm()+CAPConstants.PERCENTILE_SYMBOL); ps.setInt(4, 1); } if(userVO.getQueryAction()!=null && userVO.getQueryAction().equals(CAPConstants.GET_DATA)) queryString += " ORDER BY APPL_USR_ID LIMIT " + userVO.getPAGE_MIN_LIMIT() + ", " + userVO.getPAGE_MAX_LIMIT(); else queryString += " ORDER BY APPL_USR_ID"; rs = ps.executeQuery(); if(userVO.getQueryAction()!=null && userVO.getQueryAction().equals(CAPConstants.GET_DATA)) { int tempCOunt = 0; while(rs!=null && rs.next()) { tempCOunt ++; UserVO returnVO = new UserVO(); returnVO.setAppUsrId(rs.getInt("APPL_USR_ID")); returnVO.setAppUsrNm(rs.getString("APPL_USR_NM")); returnVO.setAppUsrFirstNm(rs.getString("APPL_USR_FRST_NM")); returnVO.setAppUsrLastNm(rs.getString("APPL_USR_LST_NM")); if (rs.getString("ACCESS_ROLE_CD")!=null && rs.getString("ACCESS_ROLE_CD").trim().equalsIgnoreCase(CAPConstants.ADMINISTRATOR_ROLE_CD)) returnVO.setApplicationLevelRole("Administrator"); else if (rs.getString("ACCESS_ROLE_CD")!=null && rs.getString("ACCESS_ROLE_CD").trim().equalsIgnoreCase(CAPConstants.MAINTAINER_ROLE_CD)) returnVO.setApplicationLevelRole("Maintainer"); else if (rs.getString("ACCESS_ROLE_CD")!=null && rs.getString("ACCESS_ROLE_CD").trim().equalsIgnoreCase(CAPConstants.VIEWER_ROLE_CD)) returnVO.setApplicationLevelRole("Viewer"); else returnVO.setApplicationLevelRole("None"); returnList.add(returnVO); } System.out.println("Count >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "+tempCOunt); userVO.setReturnListFromDB(returnList); } else { int rowcount = 0; if (rs.last()) { rowcount = rs.getRow(); rs.beforeFirst(); // not rs.first() because the rs.next() below will move on, missing the first element } userVO.setTotalRecordCount(rowcount); System.out.println("Total count of the records to be used for pagination >> "+rowcount); rowcount = 0; while(rs!=null && rs.next()) { rowcount ++; UserVO returnVO = new UserVO(); returnVO.setAppUsrId(rs.getInt("APPL_USR_ID")); returnVO.setAppUsrNm(rs.getString("APPL_USR_NM")); returnVO.setAppUsrFirstNm(rs.getString("APPL_USR_FRST_NM")); returnVO.setAppUsrLastNm(rs.getString("APPL_USR_LST_NM")); if (rs.getString("ACCESS_ROLE_CD")!=null && rs.getString("ACCESS_ROLE_CD").trim().equalsIgnoreCase(CAPConstants.ADMINISTRATOR_ROLE_CD)) returnVO.setApplicationLevelRole("Administrator"); else if (rs.getString("ACCESS_ROLE_CD")!=null && rs.getString("ACCESS_ROLE_CD").trim().equalsIgnoreCase(CAPConstants.MAINTAINER_ROLE_CD)) returnVO.setApplicationLevelRole("Maintainer"); else if (rs.getString("ACCESS_ROLE_CD")!=null && rs.getString("ACCESS_ROLE_CD").trim().equalsIgnoreCase(CAPConstants.VIEWER_ROLE_CD)) returnVO.setApplicationLevelRole("Viewer"); else returnVO.setApplicationLevelRole("None"); returnList.add(returnVO); System.out.println("Row count >>"+rowcount); if(rowcount == CAPConstants.PAGINATION_MAX_VALUE) break; } rowcount = 0; userVO.setReturnListFromDB(returnList); } System.out.println("returnList >>"+returnList); return userVO; } catch (Throwable e) { e.printStackTrace(); logger.writeToTivoliAlertLog(className, CAPConstants.ERROR, methodName, userVO.getAppUsrNm(), "Error occured while trying to fetch application user details. Printing stack trace to the log for analysis..", e); throw new CAPDAOException("Error occured while trying to fetch application user details.",CAPException.SPEXECUTION_ERROR_CODE); } finally{ closeTransactionAndSession(session,transaction); } } MYSQL Query - SELECT APPL_USR_ID,APPL_USR_NM,APPL_USR_FRST_NM, APPL_USR_LST_NM,ACCESS_ROLE_CD FROM APPL_USR WHERE APPL_USR_NM LIKE '%' AND APPL_USR_FRST_NM LIKE '%' AND APPL_USR_LST_NM LIKE '%' AND APPL_USR_ID != 1 ORDER BY APPL_USR_ID LIMIT 10, 10

    Read the article

  • Limit foreign key choices in select in an inline form in admin

    - by mightyhal
    Edited :-) Hopefully a bit clearer now. The logic is of the model is: A Building has many Rooms A Room may be inside another Room (a closet, for instance--ForeignKey on 'self') A Room can only in inside of another Room in the same building (this is the tricky part) Here's the code I have: #spaces/models.py from django.db import models class Building(models.Model): name=models.CharField(max_length=32) def __unicode__(self): return self.name class Room(models.Model): number=models.CharField(max_length=8) building=models.ForeignKey(Building) inside_room=models.ForeignKey('self',blank=True,null=True) def __unicode__(self): return self.number and: #spaces/admin.py from ex.spaces.models import Building, Room from django.contrib import admin class RoomAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin): pass class RoomInline(admin.TabularInline): model = Room extra = 2 class BuildingAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin): inlines=[RoomInline] admin.site.register(Building, BuildingAdmin) admin.site.register(Room) The inline will display only rooms in the current building (which is what I want). The problem, though, is that for the inside_room drop down, it displays all of the rooms in the Rooms table (including those in other buildings). In the inline of rooms, I need to limit the inside_room choices to only rooms which are in the current building being displayed by the main form. I can't figure out a way to do it with either a limit_choices_to in the model, nor can I figure out how exactly to override the admin's inline formset properly (I feel like I should be somehow create a custom inline form, pass the building_id of the main form to the custom inline, then limit the queryset for the field's choices based on that--but I just can't wrap my head around how to do it). Maybe this is too complex for the admin site, but it seems like something that would be generally useful... Thanks again for your help!

    Read the article

  • Codeigniter php activerecord orm limit and offset

    - by user2167174
    I am a bit stuck with this problem I have in phpactiverecord. What I am trying to do is a pagination so I need to limit and offset the query results. I am accessing all of the user posts like so: $user-post; How can I query this to limit and offset the results? Thanx in advance. Code: public function office() { if (!$this->session->userdata('username')) { redirect(base_url()); } $data = array(); $data['posts'] = []; $user = User::find('first', array('id' => $this->session->userdata('id'))); if ($user != null) { if ($user->post != null) { foreach ($user->post as $post) { $posts = array($post->name, $post->description, $post->date,'<a href="'.base_url().'Posts/edit/'.$post->id.'">Edit</a> <br /><a href="'.base_url().'Posts/delete/'.$post->id.'">Delete</a>'); array_push($data['posts'], $posts); } $this->table->set_heading('Name', 'Description', 'Date', '<a href="'.base_url().'Posts/create">+Add</a>'); $tmpl = array('table_open' => '<table class="table table-stripped table-bordered user-posts">'); $this->table->set_template($tmpl); $data['table'] = $this->table->generate($data['posts']); } $this->load->view('template/header.php'); $this->load->view('Users/office.php', $data); $this->load->view('template/footer.php'); } else { redirect(base_url()); } }

    Read the article

  • Yii 'limit' on related model's scope

    - by pethee
    I have a model called Guesses that has_many Comments. I'm making eager queries to this to then pass on as JSON as response to an API call. The relations are obviously set between the two models and they are correct(one2many <= belongs2) I added a scope to Comments called 'api' like this: public function scopes() { return array( 'api' => array( 'select' => 'id, comment, date', 'limit'=>3, 'order'=>'date DESC', 'together'=>true, ), ); } And I'm running the following one-liner query: $data = Guesses::model()->with('comments:api')->findAll(); The issue here is that when calling the 'api' scope using a with('relation'), the limit property simply doesn't apply. I added the 'together'=true there for another type of scope, plus I hear it might help. It doesn't make a difference. I don't need all the comments of all Guesses. I want the top 3 (or 5). I am also trying to keep the one-liner call intact and simple, manage everything through scopes, relations and parameterized functions so that the API call itself is clean and simple. Any advice?

    Read the article

  • Rails validation count limit on has_many :through

    - by Jeremy
    I've got the following models: Team, Member, Assignment, Role The Team model has_many Members. Each Member has_many roles through assignments. Role assignments are Captain and Runner. I have also installed devise and CanCan using the Member model. What I need to do is limit each Team to have a max of 1 captain and 5 runners. I found this example, and it seemed to work after some customization, but on update ('teams/1/members/4/edit'). It doesn't work on create ('teams/1/members/new'). But my other validation (validates :role_ids, :presence = true ) does work on both update and create. Any help would be appreciated. Update: I've found this example that would seem to be similar to my problem but I can't seem to make it work for my app. It seems that the root of the problem lies with how the count (or size) is performed before and during validation. For Example: When updating a record... It checks to see how many runners there are on a team and returns a count. (i.e. 5) Then when I select a role(s) to add to the member it takes the known count from the database (i.e. 5) and adds the proposed changes (i.e. 1), and then runs the validation check. (Team.find(self.team_id).members.runner.count 5) This works fine because it returns a value of 6 and 6 5 so the proposed update fails without saving and an error is given. But when I try to create a new member on the team... It checks to see how many runners there are on a team and returns a count. (i.e. 5) Then when I select a role(s) to add to the member it takes the known count from the database (i.e. 5) and then runs the validation check WITHOUT factoring in the proposed changes. This doesn't work because it returns a value of 5 known runner and 5 = 5 so the proposed update passes and the new member and role is saved to the database with no error. Member Model: class Member < ActiveRecord::Base devise :database_authenticatable, :registerable, :recoverable, :rememberable, :trackable, :validatable attr_accessible :password, :password_confirmation, :remember_me attr_accessible :age, :email, :first_name, :last_name, :sex, :shirt_size, :team_id, :assignments_attributes, :role_ids belongs_to :team has_many :assignments, :dependent => :destroy has_many :roles, through: :assignments accepts_nested_attributes_for :assignments scope :runner, joins(:roles).where('roles.title = ?', "Runner") scope :captain, joins(:roles).where('roles.title = ?', "Captain") validate :validate_runner_count validate :validate_captain_count validates :role_ids, :presence => true def validate_runner_count if Team.find(self.team_id).members.runner.count > 5 errors.add(:role_id, 'Error - Max runner limit reached') end end def validate_captain_count if Team.find(self.team_id).members.captain.count > 1 errors.add(:role_id, 'Error - Max captain limit reached') end end def has_role?(role_sym) roles.any? { |r| r.title.underscore.to_sym == role_sym } end end Member Controller: class MembersController < ApplicationController load_and_authorize_resource :team load_and_authorize_resource :member, :through => :team before_filter :get_team before_filter :initialize_check_boxes, :only => [:create, :update] def get_team @team = Team.find(params[:team_id]) end def index respond_to do |format| format.html # index.html.erb format.json { render json: @members } end end def show respond_to do |format| format.html # show.html.erb format.json { render json: @member } end end def new respond_to do |format| format.html # new.html.erb format.json { render json: @member } end end def edit end def create respond_to do |format| if @member.save format.html { redirect_to [@team, @member], notice: 'Member was successfully created.' } format.json { render json: [@team, @member], status: :created, location: [@team, @member] } else format.html { render action: "new" } format.json { render json: @member.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity } end end end def update respond_to do |format| if @member.update_attributes(params[:member]) format.html { redirect_to [@team, @member], notice: 'Member was successfully updated.' } format.json { head :no_content } else format.html { render action: "edit" } format.json { render json: @member.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity } end end end def destroy @member.destroy respond_to do |format| format.html { redirect_to team_members_url } format.json { head :no_content } end end # Allow empty checkboxes # http://railscasts.com/episodes/17-habtm-checkboxes def initialize_check_boxes params[:member][:role_ids] ||= [] end end _Form Partial <%= form_for [@team, @member], :html => { :class => 'form-horizontal' } do |f| %> #... # testing the count... <ul> <li>Captain - <%= Team.find(@member.team_id).members.captain.size %></li> <li>Runner - <%= Team.find(@member.team_id).members.runner.size %></li> <li>Driver - <%= Team.find(@member.team_id).members.driver.size %></li> </ul> <div class="control-group"> <div class="controls"> <%= f.fields_for :roles do %> <%= hidden_field_tag "member[role_ids][]", nil %> <% Role.all.each do |role| %> <%= check_box_tag "member[role_ids][]", role.id, @member.role_ids.include?(role.id), id: dom_id(role) %> <%= label_tag dom_id(role), role.title %> <% end %> <% end %> </div> </div> #... <% end %>

    Read the article

  • the limit of pageviews per month in Google Analytics

    - by crmpicco
    I have been looking around to try and find some confirmation and clarity on the limit of pageviews that Google allow per month for a Google Analytics account. I have read that the limit of hits per month is 10,000,000, and the limit of pageviews is 5,000,000. Putting 2 and 2 together I am thinking this is to allow the other 5,000,000 for events and social clicks and the like? Google's documentation states 5m, but the hits/pageviews is a bit of a grey area as i've read suggestions that the limit can be considered as 10m

    Read the article

  • Issues with LVM partition size in Server 13.04

    - by Michael
    I am new to ubuntu and a little confused about how hard drive partitions and LVM works. I remember setting up Ubuntu server 13.04 and telling to to use 1TB of a 3TB server. Well I have maxed that out with blu-ray rips and want the rest of the drive for space. On log-in it says: System load: 2.24 Processes: 179 Usage of /: 88.7% of 912.89GB Users logged in: 0 Memory usage: 6% IP address for p5p1: 192.168.0.100 Swap usage: 0% => / is using 88.7% of 912.89GB lvdisplay outputs: --- Logical volume --- LV Path /dev/DeathStar-vg/root LV Name root VG Name DeathStar-vg LV Write Access read/write LV Creation host, time DeathStar, 2013-05-18 22:21:11 -0400 LV Status available # open 1 LV Size 2.70 TiB Current LE 707789 Segments 2 Allocation inherit Read ahead sectors auto - currently set to 256 Block device 252:0 --- Logical volume --- LV Path /dev/DeathStar-vg/swap_1 LV Name swap_1 VG Name DeathStar-vg LV Write Access read/write LV Creation host, time DeathStar, 2013-05-18 22:21:11 -0400 LV Status available # open 2 LV Size 3.75 GiB Current LE 959 Segments 1 Allocation inherit Read ahead sectors auto - currently set to 256 Block device 252:1 vgdisplay outputs: VG Name DeathStar-vg System ID Format lvm2 Metadata Areas 1 Metadata Sequence No 4 VG Access read/write VG Status resizable MAX LV 0 Cur LV 2 Open LV 2 Max PV 0 Cur PV 1 Act PV 1 VG Size 2.73 TiB PE Size 4.00 MiB Total PE 715335 Alloc PE / Size 708748 / 2.70 TiB Free PE / Size 6587 / 25.73 GiB df outputs: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/DeathStar--vg-root 957238932 848972636 59634696 94% / none 4 0 4 0% /sys/fs/cgroup udev 1864716 4 1864712 1% /dev tmpfs 374968 1060 373908 1% /run none 5120 4 5116 1% /run/lock none 1874824 148 1874676 1% /run/shm none 102400 24 102376 1% /run/user /dev/sda2 234153 56477 165184 26% /boot And fdisk /dev/sda -l outputs: Disk /dev/sda: 3000.6 GB, 3000592982016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 364801 cylinders, total 5860533168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 4294967295 2147483647+ ee GPT Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary. I just don't know what to make of all this and am not sure how I can make it use all 2.73TBs. Thanks in advance for any help. EDIT-- Yes I did make changes to the LVM Config, but it didnt do anything. As requested, output of parted -l /dev/sda Model: ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68A (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 3001GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B Partition Table: gpt Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 1049kB 2097kB 1049kB bios_grub 2 2097kB 258MB 256MB ext2 3 258MB 3001GB 3000GB lvm Model: ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68A (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 3001GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags Model: Linux device-mapper (linear) (dm) Disk /dev/mapper/DeathStar--vg-swap_1: 4022MB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B Partition Table: loop Number Start End Size File system Flags 1 0.00B 4022MB 4022MB linux-swap(v1) Model: Linux device-mapper (linear) (dm) Disk /dev/mapper/DeathStar--vg-root: 2969GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B Partition Table: loop Number Start End Size File system Flags 1 0.00B 2969GB 2969GB ext4

    Read the article

  • Overcome VBA InputBox Character Limit

    - by Ryan B
    Hi, The current function I use to collect text InputBox can't accept more than 255 characters apparently, and I need to be able to collect more than that? Is there a parameter or different function I can use to increase this limit?

    Read the article

  • MySQL doesn't yet support 'LIMIT & IN/ALL/ANY/SOME subquery'

    - by user198729
    SELECT u.id AS u__id, u.username AS u__username, p.id AS p__id, p.phonenumber AS p__phonenumber, p.user_id AS p__user_id FROM user u INNER JOIN phonenumber p ON u.id = p.user_id WHERE u.id IN (SELECT DISTINCT u2.id FROM user u2 INNER JOIN phonenumber p2 ON u2.id = p2.user_id LIMIT 20) This query is from here: http://www.doctrine-project.org/documentation/manual/1_2/en/dql-doctrine-query-language It's supposed to work on all DBMS ,but not in fact

    Read the article

  • twitter api post rate limit

    - by Xavier
    Does anyone know Twitter's rate limit on posting? Looking at their web page they claimed to not have one but I get an exception thrown if my program posts too fast... Any help is appreciated.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >