Search Results

Search found 23804 results on 953 pages for 'void pointer'.

Page 3/953 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• GCC, functions, and pointer arguments, warning behaviour

  - by James Morris

  I've recently updated to a testing distribution, which is now using GCC 4.4.3. Now I've set everything up, I've returned to coding and have built my project and I get one of these horrible messages: *** glibc detected *** ./boxyseq: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000000001d873e8 *** I absolutely know what is wrong here, but was rather confused as to when I saw my C code where I call a function which frees a dynamically allocated data structure - I had passed it an incompatible pointer type - a pointer to a completely different data structure. warning: passing argument 1 of 'data_A_free' from incompatible pointer type note: expected 'struct data_A *' but argument is of type 'struct data_B *' I'm confused because I'm sure this would have been an error before and compilation would never have completed. Is this not just going to make life more difficult for C programmers? Can I change it back to an error without making a whole bunch of other warnings errors too? Or am I loosing the plot and it's always been a warning?

  Read the article

• How many instructions to access pointer in C?

  - by Derek

  Hi All, I am trying to figure out how many clock cycles or total instructions it takes to access a pointer in C. I dont think I know how to figure out for example, p-x = d-a + f-b i would assume two loads per pointer, just guessing that there would be a load for the pointer, and a load for the value. So in this operations, the pointer resolution would be a much larger factor than the actual addition, as far as trying to speed this code up, right? This may depend on the compiler and architecture implemented, but am I on the right track? I have seen some code where each value used in say, 3 additions, came from a f2->sum = p1->p2->p3->x + p1->p2->p3->a + p1->p2->p3->m type of structure, and I am trying to define how bad this is

  Read the article

• C Pointer Question: &(*struct->struct)

  - by NTek

  I have a struct defined with the structure as follows (names are different) struct str1 { int field1; struct str2; } And I have a *str1 in a function. I'd like to get a pointer to str2. So I tried &(str1->str2) and was hoping this would return a pointer to str2. Is this incorrect? It doesn't seem to be working. How would I get a pointer to str2 if given a pointer to str1?

  Read the article

• How to const declare the this pointer sent as parameter

  - by Tomas

  Hi, I want to const declare the this pointer received as an argument. static void Class::func(const OtherClass *otherClass) { // use otherClass pointer to read, but not write to it. } It is being called like this: void OtherClass::func() { Class::func(this); } This does not compile nad if i dont const declare the OtherClass pointer, I can change it. Thanks.

  Read the article

• What is "null pointer assignment error"?

  - by sharptooth

  One of job interview questions on C pointer here is the following: what is null pointer assignment error? I've googled for a while and don't see any reasonable explanation. What is that? Trying to write through a null pointer? Something architecture- or environment-specific? What exactly is that error?

  Read the article

• Base class pointer vs inherited class pointer?

  - by Goose Bumper

  Suppose I have a class Dog that inherits from a class Animal. What is the difference between these two lines of code? Animal *a = new Dog(); Dog *d = new Dog(); In one, the pointer is for the base class, and in the other, the pointer is for the derived class. But when would this distinction become important? For polymorphism, either one would work exactly the same, right?

  Read the article

• Dereference a pointer inside a structure pointer

  - by klez

  I have a structure: struct mystruct { int* pointer; }; structure mystruct* struct_inst; Now I want to change the value pointed to by struct_inst->pointer. How can I do that?

  Read the article

• C++ function pointer as parameter

  - by Roland Soós

  Hello, I try to call a function which passed as function pointer with no argument, but I can't make it work. void *disconnectFunc; void D::setDisconnectFunc(void (*func)){ disconnectFunc = func; } void D::disconnected(){ *disconnectFunc; connected = false; }

  Read the article

• pointer-to-pointer of derived class in multiple inheritance

  - by Abdul jalil

  i have 3 classes A,B and C. C is derived from A and B. i get pointer to pointer of class C and cast to A** , and B ** , the variable that hold the the B** has the address of A** in my example B ** BdoublePtr hold the address of A** .i am using the following code #include "conio.h" #include "stdio.h" #include "string.h" class A{ public: A() { strA=new char[30]; strcpy(strA,"class A"); } char *strA; }; class B { public: B() { strB=new char[30]; strcpy(strB,"class B"); } char *strB; }; class C :public A, public B { public: C() { strC=new char[30]; strcpy(strC,"class C"); } char *strC; }; int main(void) { C* ptrC=new C(); A * Aptr=(A*)ptrC; printf("\n class A value : %s",Aptr-strA); B * Bptr=(B*)ptrC; printf("\n class B value :%s",Bptr-strB); printf("\n\nnow with double pointer "); A ** AdoublePtr=(A **)&ptrC; Aptr=AdoublePtr; printf("\n class A value : %s",Aptr-strA); B * BdoublePtr=(B **)&ptrC; Bptr=*BdoublePtr; printf("\n class B value : %s",Bptr-strB); getch(); return 0; }

  Read the article

• C++, function pointer to the template function pointer

  - by Ian

  I am having a pointer to the common static method class MyClass { private: static double ( *pfunction ) ( const Object *, const Object *); ... }; pointing to the static method class SomeClass { public: static double getA ( const Object *o1, const Object *o2); ... }; Initialization: double ( *MyClass::pfunction ) ( const Object *o1, const Object *o2 ) = &SomeClass::getA; I would like to convert this pointer to the static template function pointer: template <class T> static T ( *pfunction ) ( const Object <T> *, const Object <T> *); //Compile error where: class SomeClass { public: template <class T> static double getA ( const Object <T> *o1, const Object <T> *o2); ... }; But there is some error... Thanks for your help...

  Read the article

• Pointer initialization

  - by SoulBeaver

  Sorry if this question has been asked before. On my search through SO I didn't find one that asked what I wanted to know. Basically, when I have this: typedef struct node { int data; node *node; } *head; and do node *newItem = new node; I am under the impression that I am declaring and reserving space, but not defining, a pointer to struct node, is that correct? So when I do newItem->data = 100 and newItem->next = 0 I get confused. newItem = 0would declare what exactly? Both data and next? The object as a whole? I'm especially confused when I use typedef. Which part is the macro? I assume node because that's how I call it, but why do I need it? Finally, what happens when I do: node *temp; temp = new node; temp = head->next; head->next = newItem; newItem->next = temp; I mean, head-next is a pointer pointing to object newItem, so I assume not to newItem.data or next themselves. So how can I use an uninitialized pointer that I described above safely like here? is head now not pointing to an uninitialized pointer?

  Read the article

• c program pointer

  - by sandy101

  Hello , I am trying some programs in c face a problem with this program #include<stdio.h> int main() { int a=9,*x; float b=3.6,*y; char c='a',*z; printf("the value is %d\n",a); printf("the value is %f\n",b); printf("the value is %c\n",c); x=&a; y=&b; z=&c; printf("%u\n",a); printf("%u\n",b); printf("%u\n",c); x++; y++; z++; printf("%u\n",a); printf("%u\n",b); printf("%u\n",c); return 0; } can any one tell me what is the problem with this and i also want to know that when in the above case if the pointer value is incremented then will it over write the previous value address as suppose that the value we got in the above program (without the increment in the pointer value )is 65524 65520 65519 and after the increment the value of the pointer is 65526(as 2 increment for the int ) 65524(as 4 increment for the float ) 65520(as 1 increment for the char variable ) then if in that case will the new pointer address overwrite the content of the previous address and what value be contained at the new address ......plz help

  Read the article

• What is the use of Pointer to Pointer?

  - by hiral

  Why do we need a double pointer? What are some examples or use cases?

  Read the article

• commands&creating pointer [closed]

  - by gcc

  input 23 3 4 4 42 n 23 0 9 9 n n n 3 9 9 x //according to input,i should create int pointer arrays. pointer arrays // starting from 1 (that is initial arrays is arrays[1].when program sees n ,it // must be jumb to arrays 2 // the first int input 23 is num_arrays which used in malloc(sizeof(int)*num_arrays expected output: elements of arrays[1] 3 4 5 42 elements of arrays[2] 23 0 9 9 elements of arrays[5] 3 9 9 another input 12 2 3 4 n n 2 3 4 n 12 3 x expected output elements of arrays[1] 2 3 4 elements of arrays[3] 2 3 4 elements of arrays[4] 12 3 specification: x is stopper n is comman to create new pointer array i am new in this site anyone help me how can i write

  Read the article

• n & x commands&creating pointer&with using malloc [closed]

  - by gcc

  input 23 3 4 4 42 n 23 0 9 9 n n n 3 9 9 x //according to input,i should create int pointer arrays. pointer arrays // starting from 1 (that is initial arrays is arrays[1].when program sees n ,it // must be jumb to arrays 2 // the first int input 23 is num_arrays which used in malloc(sizeof(int)*num_arrays expected output arrays[1] 3 4 5 42 arrays[2] 23 0 9 9 arrays[5] 3 9 9 another input 12 2 3 4 n n 2 3 4 n 12 3 x expected output arrays[1] 2 3 4 arrays[3] 2 3 4 arrays[4] 12 3 x is stopper n is comman to create new pointer array i am new in this site anyone help me how can i write

  Read the article

• Question on Pointer Arithmetic

  - by pws5068

  Heyy Everybody! I am trying to create a memory management system, so that a user can call myMalloc, a method I created. I have a linked list keeping track of my free memory. My problem is when I am attempting to find the end of a free bit in my linked list. I am attempting to add the size of the memory free in that section (which is in the linked list) to the pointer to the front of the free space, like this. void *tailEnd = previousPlace->head_ptr + ((previousPlace->size+1)*(sizeof(int)); I was hoping that this would give me a pointer to the end of that segment. However, I keep getting the warning: "pointer of type 'void*' used in arithmetic" Is there a better way of doing this? Thanks!

  Read the article

• "Initializing" the pointer in the separate function in C

  - by pechenie

  I need to do a simple thing, which I used to do many times in Java, but I'm stuck in C (pure C, not C++). The situation looks like this: int *a; void initArray( int *arr ) { arr = malloc( sizeof( int ) * SIZE ); } int main() { initArray( a ); // a is NULL here! what to do?! return 0; } I have some "initializing" function, which SHOULD assign a given pointer to some allocated data (doesn't matter). How should I give a pointer to a function in order to this pointer will be modified, and then can be used further in the code (after that function call returns)? Thanx for help.

  Read the article

• function pointer error

  - by Codeguru

  Can anybody help me with this simple code?? include using namespace std; void testFunction(){ cout<<"This is the test function 0"< void testFunction1(){ cout<<"This is the test function 1"< void testFunction2(){ cout<<"This is the test function 2"< int main(){ //fp=testFunction; (*fp[testFunction1])(); //cout<<"Addrees of the function pointer is:"<<*fp; } Iam getting the following error: error: invalid types `void (*[3])()[void ()()]' for array subscript|

  Read the article

• Passing NSArray Pointer Rather Than A Pointer To a Specific Type

  - by mattmccomb

  I've just written a piece of code to display a UIActionSheet within my app. Whilst looking at the code to initialise my UIActionSheet something struck me as a little strange. The initialisation function has the following signature... initWithTitle:(NSString *)title delegate:(id UIActionSheetDelegate)delegate cancelButtonTitle:(NSString *)cancelButtonTitle destructiveButtonTitle:(NSString *)destructiveButtonTitle otherButtonTitles:(NSString *)otherButtonTitles As you can see the otherButtonTitles parameter is a pointer to a String. In my code I set it as follows... otherButtonTitles: @"Title", @"Date", nil Although this compiles fine I don't really understand how it works. My reading of the statement is that I have created an inline array containing two elements (Title and Date). How come this then compiles? I'm passing a NSArray* in place of a NSString*. I know from a little of understanding of C++ that an array is really a pointer to the first element. So is this inline array that I'm creating a C array as opposed to a NSArray? What I'm hoping to achieve is to be able to pass a static NSArray* used elsewhere in my class to the otherButtonTitles parameter. But passing the NSArray* object directly doesn't work.

  Read the article

• Normal pointer vs Auto pointer (std::auto_ptr)

  - by AKN

  Code snippet (normal pointer) int *pi = new int; int i = 90; pi = &i; int k = *pi + 10; cout<<k<<endl; delete pi; [Output: 100] Code snippet (auto pointer) Case 1: std::auto_ptr<int> pi(new int); int i = 90; pi = &i; int k = *pi + 10; //Throws unhandled exception error at this point while debugging. cout<<k<<endl; //delete pi; (It deletes by itself when goes out of scope. So explicit 'delete' call not required) Case 2: std::auto_ptr<int> pi(new int); int i = 90; *pi = 90; int k = *pi + 10; cout<<k<<endl; [Output: 100] Can someone please tell why it failed to work for case 1?

  Read the article

• segmentation fault when using pointer to pointer

  - by user3697730

  I had been trying to use a pointer to pointer in a function,but is seems that I am not doing the memory allocation correctly... My code is: #include<stdio.h> #include<math.h> #include<ctype.h> #include<stdlib.h> #include<string.h> struct list{ int data; struct list *next; }; void abc (struct list **l,struct list **l2) { *l2=NULL; l2=(struct list**)malloc( sizeof(struct list*)); (*l)->data=12; printf("%d",(*l)->data); (*l2)->next=*l2; } int main() { struct list *l,*l2; abc(&l,&l2); system("pause"); return(0); } This code compiles,but I cannot run thw program..I get a segmentation fault..What should I do?Any help would be appreciated!

  Read the article

• Handles and pointer to object

  - by Tony

  I have a python Interpreter written in C++, the PyRun_String function from the Python API is said to return a handle, however in my code I have it assigned to pointer to a PyObject? PyObject* presult = PyRun_String(code, parse_mode, dict, dict); Is this actually correct? Can you implicitly cast this handle to this object pointer? Should it not be a HANDLE instead?

  Read the article

• pointer is always byte aligned

  - by kumar

  Hi, I read something like pointer must be byte-aligned. My understanding in a typical 32bit architecture... all pointers are byte aligned...No ? Please confirm. can there be a pointer which is not byte-aligned ?

  Read the article

• C++ pointer to objects

  - by Tony

  In C++ do you always have initialize a pointer to an object with the new keyword? Or can you just have this too: MyClass *myclass; myclass->DoSomething(); I thought this was a pointer allocated on the stack instead of the heap, but since objects are normally heap allocated, I think my theory is probably faulty?? Please advice.

  Read the article

• the "new" operator in c++, pointer question

  - by Crystal

  Dumb question, but whenever you call new, do you always have a pointer? SomeClass *person = new SomeClass(); And is that because you need a pointer to point to that new space of memory that was allocated for the SomeClass variable person? Thanks!

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >