Search Results

Search found 89717 results on 3589 pages for 'code navigation'.

Page 348/3589 | < Previous Page | 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355  | Next Page >

  • Getting ORA Oracle error code using PHP function oci_connect?

    - by me_here
    The PHP function oci_connect (which connects to an Oracle database) just returns false if it fails, which at the moment I handle like this: $connection = oci_connect($username, $password, $database); if (!$connection){ return $result = "Trouble connecting to the Oracle Database"; } But really I'd like to have the actual ORA error code, so I can be more informative. Is this possible?

    Read the article

  • uninitialized constant Encoding rake db:migrate

    - by Denis
    Hi, My RoR App use rails 2.1.2 When I run rake db:migrate --trace I get the following error, Any idea? ** Invoke db:migrate (first_time) ** Invoke environment (first_time) ** Execute environment ** Execute db:migrate rake aborted! uninitialized constant Encoding /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:278:in `load_missing_constant' /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:467:in `const_missing' /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:479:in `const_missing' /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/sqlite3-0.0.8/lib/sqlite3/encoding.rb:9:in `find' /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/sqlite3-0.0.8/lib/sqlite3/database.rb:66:in `initialize' /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/sqlite3_adapter.rb:13:in `new' /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/sqlite3_adapter.rb:13:in `sqlite3_connection' /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_specification.rb:292:in `send' /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_specification.rb:292:in `connection=' /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_specification.rb:260:in `retrieve_connection' /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_specification.rb:78:in `connection' /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/migration.rb:408:in `initialize' /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/migration.rb:373:in `new' /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/migration.rb:373:in `up' /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/migration.rb:356:in `migrate' /Users/denisjacquemin/Documents/code/projects/BmfOnRails/vendor/rails/railties/lib/tasks/databases.rake:99 /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:636:in `call' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:636:in `execute' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:631:in `each' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:631:in `execute' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:597:in `invoke_with_call_chain' /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/monitor.rb:242:in `synchronize' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:590:in `invoke_with_call_chain' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:583:in `invoke' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2051:in `invoke_task' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2029:in `top_level' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2029:in `each' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2029:in `top_level' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2068:in `standard_exception_handling' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2023:in `top_level' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2001:in `run' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2068:in `standard_exception_handling' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:1998:in `run' /Users/denisjacquemin/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/bin/rake:31 /usr/bin/rake:19:in `load' /usr/bin/rake:19 My database.yml development: adapter: sqlite3 database: db/development.sqlite3 pool: 5 timeout: 5000 thanks

    Read the article

  • What is the best way to organize object oriented code?

    - by Adam
    I haven't coded in java for a long time, and after coding in C, I'm having issued organizing my code for OOP. More specifically I'm not sure when to create a new method, and when to create a new class, and when to just lump everything together. Are there some general rules or guidelines on how it should be done?

    Read the article

  • Can I customize the Magento app/code/core folder without affecting future upgrades?

    - by mck89
    I found a guide on how to add new attributes to users, it explains that for this operation I must modify some files in the app / code / core / Mage directory (the directory that contains Magento’s modules). But if i make some changes in that folder will this affect future upgrades? Will an upgrade will delete my changes? Should I limit the changes only to my modules to not have problems with updates?

    Read the article

  • Where should I put the code for a Django admin action for a third party app?

    - by charlie
    Hi, I'm new to Django. I am writing my own administrative action for a third party app/model, similar to this: http://mnjournal.com/post/2009/jul/10/adding-django-admin-actions-contrib-apps/ It's a simple snippet of code. I'm just wondering where people suggest that I put it. I don't want to put in the third party app because I might need to update to a newer version at some point. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to rewrite this jQuery code by using Mootools?

    - by Nikita Sumeiko
    I have a jQuery code, but need it working by using Mootools: if ( $("span.mailme").length ) { var at = / AT /; var dot = / DOT /g; $('span.mailme').each(function () { var addr = $(this).text().replace(at, '@').replace(dot, '.'); $(this).after('<a href="mailto:' + addr + '">' + addr + '</a>'); $(this).remove(); }); } Is there anyone, who know as good Mootools as jQuery?

    Read the article

  • What's the best way to call an IBAction from within code?

    - by Rob
    Say for instance I have an IBAction that is hooked up to a button in interface builder. - (IBAction)functionToBeCalled:(id)sender { // do something here } Within my code, say for instance in another method, what is the best way to call that IBAction? If I try to call it like this, I receive an error: [self functionToBeCalled:]; But, if I try to call it like this (cheating a bit, I think), it works fine: [self functionToBeCalled:0]; What is the proper way to call it though?

    Read the article

  • using a Singleton to pass credentials in a multi-tenant application a code smell?

    - by Hans Gruber
    Currently working on a multi-tenant application that employs Shared DB/Shared Schema approach. IOW, we enforce tenant data segregation by defining a TenantID column on all tables. By convention, all SQL reads/writes must include a Where TenantID = '?' clause. Not an ideal solution, but hindsight is 20/20. Anyway, since virtually every page/workflow in our app must display tenant specific data, I made the (poor) decision at the project's outset to employ a Singleton to encapsulate the current user credentials (i.e. TenantID and UserID). My thinking at the time was that I didn't want to add a TenantID parameter to each and every method signature in my Data layer. Here's what the basic pseudo-code looks like: public class UserIdentity { public UserIdentity(int tenantID, int userID) { TenantID = tenantID; UserID = userID; } public int TenantID { get; private set; } public int UserID { get; private set; } } public class AuthenticationModule : IHttpModule { public void Init(HttpApplication context) { context.AuthenticateRequest += new EventHandler(context_AuthenticateRequest); } private void context_AuthenticateRequest(object sender, EventArgs e) { var userIdentity = _authenticationService.AuthenticateUser(sender); if (userIdentity == null) { //authentication failed, so redirect to login page, etc } else { //put the userIdentity into the HttpContext object so that //its only valid for the lifetime of a single request HttpContext.Current.Items["UserIdentity"] = userIdentity; } } } public static class CurrentUser { public static UserIdentity Instance { get { return HttpContext.Current.Items["UserIdentity"]; } } } public class WidgetRepository: IWidgetRepository{ public IEnumerable<Widget> ListWidgets(){ var tenantId = CurrentUser.Instance.TenantID; //call sproc with tenantId parameter } } As you can see, there are several code smells here. This is a singleton, so it's already not unit test friendly. On top of that you have a very tight-coupling between CurrentUser and the HttpContext object. By extension, this also means that I have a reference to System.Web in my Data layer (shudder). I want to pay down some technical debt this sprint by getting rid of this singleton for the reasons mentioned above. I have a few thoughts on what an better implementation might be, but if anyone has any guidance or lessons learned they could share, I would be much obliged.

    Read the article

  • What was the most refreshingly honest non-technical comment you saw in the code?

    - by DVK
    OK, so we all saw the lists of "funny" or "bad" comments. However, today, when maintaining an old stored proc, I stumbled upon a comment which I couldn't classify other than "refreshingly brutally honest", left by a previous maintainer around a really freakish (both performance and readability-wise) page-long query: -- Feel free to optimize this if you can understand what it means So, in the first (and hopefully only) poll type question in my history of Stack Overflow, I'd like to hear some other "refreshingly brutally honest" code comments you encountered or written.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355  | Next Page >