Search Results

Search found 7666 results on 307 pages for 'pointer to member'.

Page 38/307 | < Previous Page | 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45  | Next Page >

  • The unary increment operator in pointer arithmetic

    - by RhymesWithDuck
    Hello, this is my first post. I have this function for reversing a string in C that I found. void reverse(char* c) { if (*c != 0) { reverse(c + 1); } printf("%c",*c); } It works fine but if I replace: reverse(c + 1); with: reverse(++c); the first character of the original string is truncated. My question is why would are the statements not equivalent in this instance? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Pointer and malloc issue

    - by Andy
    I am fairly new to C and am getting stuck with arrays and pointers when they refer to strings. I can ask for input of 2 numbers (ints) and then return the one I want (first number or second number) without any issues. But when I request names and try to return them, the program crashes after I enter the first name and not sure why. In theory I am looking to reserve memory for the first name, and then expand it to include a second name. Can anyone explain why this breaks? Thanks! #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> void main () { int NumItems = 0; NumItems += 1; char* NameList = malloc(sizeof(char[10])*NumItems); printf("Please enter name #1: \n"); scanf("%9s", NameList[0]); fpurge(stdin); NumItems += 1; NameList = realloc(NameList,sizeof(char[10])*NumItems); printf("Please enter name #2: \n"); scanf("%9s", NameList[1]); fpurge(stdin); printf("The first name is: %s",NameList[0]); printf("The second name is: %s",NameList[1]); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Fatal error: Call to a member function escape() on a non-object in .....on line 10

    - by danyo
    i am making a simple javascript login form for wordpress. i have the form submitting to the following bit of php to handle the login: <?php get_header(); global $user_ID; if (!$user_ID) { if($_POST){ //We shall SQL escape all inputs $username = $wpdb->escape($_REQUEST['username']); $password = $wpdb->escape($_REQUEST['password']); $remember = $wpdb->escape($_REQUEST['rememberme']); if($remember) $remember = "true"; else $remember = "false"; $login_data = array(); $login_data['user_login'] = $username; $login_data['user_password'] = $password; $login_data['remember'] = $remember; $user_verify = wp_signon( $login_data, false ); //wp_signon is a wordpress function which authenticates a user. It accepts user info parameters as an array. if ( is_wp_error($user_verify) ) { echo "<span class='error'>Invalid username or password. Please try again!</span>"; exit(); } else { echo "<script type='text/javascript'>window.location='". get_bloginfo('url') ."'</script>"; exit(); } } else { //get_header(); ?> any ideas on why i am getting the error? Cheers, Dan

    Read the article

  • Freeing memory with Pointer Arithmetic

    - by Breedly
    C++ newb here. I'm trying to write my own implementation of an array using only pointers, and I've hit a wall I don't know how to get over. My constructor throws this error array.cpp:40:35: error: invalid conversion from ‘int*’ to ‘int’ [-fpermissive] When my array initializes I want it to free up all the spaces in the array for ints. Array::Array(int theSize){ size = theSize; int *arrayPointer = new int; int index = 0; while(theSize > index){ *(arrayPointer + index) = new int; //This is the trouble line. ++index; } } What am I doing wrong stackoverflow?

    Read the article

  • Passing a pointer to an array to glGenBuffers

    - by Josh Elsasser
    I'm currently passing an array to a function, then attempting to use glGenBuffers with the array that is passed to the function. I can't figure out a way to get glGenBuffers to work with the array that I've passed. I have a decent grasp of the basics of pointers, but this is beyond me. This is basically how the render code works. It's a bit more complex, (colours using the same array idea, also not working) but the basic idea is as follows: void drawFoo(const GLfloat *renderArray, GLuint verticeBuffer) { glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, verticeBuffer); glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(verticeBuffer)*sizeof(GLfloat), verticeBuffer, GL_STATIC_DRAW); glVertexPointer(2, GL_FLOAT, 0, 0); glEnableClientState(GL_VERTEX_BUFFER); glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLE_FAN, 0, 45); glDisableClientState(GL_VERTEX_BUFFEr); } Thanks in advance for the help

    Read the article

  • Flexible array member in C-structure

    - by Arpan
    Quoting from the C-std section 6.7.2.1, struct s { int n; double d[]; }; This is a valid structure declaration. I am looking for some practical use of this kind of syntax. To be precise, how is this construct any more or less powerful than keeping a double* as the 2nd element? Or is this another case of 'you-can-do-it-in-multiple-ways'? Arpan

    Read the article

  • Read from file into pointer to struct

    - by cla barzu
    I need help with pointers in C. I have to read from a file, and fill an array with pointers to struct rcftp_msg . Since now I did the next things: struct rcftp_msg { uint8_t version; uint8_t flags; uint16_t len; uint8_t buffer[512]; }; struct rcftp_msg *windows [10]; pfile = fopen(file,"r"); // Open the file I have to read from the file into the buffer, but I don't know how to do it. I tried the next: for (i = 0; i <10; i++){ leng=fread (**windows[i]->buffer**,sizeof(uint8_t),512,pfile); } I think windows[i]-buffer is bad, cuz that don't work. Sorry for my bad English :(

    Read the article

  • How to use pointers and pointer aritmetic

    - by booby
    : error C2064: term does not evaluate to a function taking 1 arguments : error C2227: left of '-name' must point to class/struct/union/generic type how do i fix this so this error doesn't happen for(int index = 0; index < (numStudents); index++) { if (student(index + 1)->score >= 90 ) student(index + 1)->grade = 'A'; else if (student(index + 1)->score >= 80 ) student(index + 1)->grade = 'B'; else if (student(index + 1)->score >= 70 ) student(index + 1)->grade = 'C'; else if (student(index + 1)->score >= 60 ) student(index + 1)->grade = 'D'; else student(index + 1)->grade = 'F'; }

    Read the article

  • Null pointer exception on .iterator() call

    - by Peter
    I'm getting a strange NullPointerException, evidently thrown by the following line of code: Iterator<Note> it = notes.iterator(); I've checked, and at the time the java.util.TreeSet notes is always non-null (with 15 elements). The TreeSet API says nothing about iterator() throwing NullPointerExceptions. What else could be going here?

    Read the article

  • How to mock static member variables

    - by pkrish
    I have a class ClassToTest which has a dependency on ClassToMock. public class ClassToMock { private static final String MEMBER_1 = FileReader.readMemeber1(); protected void someMethod() { ... } } The unit test case for ClassToTest. public class ClassToTestTest { private ClassToMock _mock; @Before public void setUp() throws Exception { _mock = mock(ClassToMock.class) } } When mock is called in the setUp() method, FileReader.readMemeber1(); is executed. Is there a way to avoid this? I think one way is to initialize the MEMBER_1 inside a method. Any other alternatives? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • template specilization using member enums

    - by Altan
    struct Bar { enum { Special = 4 }; }; template<class T, int K> struct Foo {}; template<class T> struct Foo<T::Special> {}; Usage: Foo<Bar> aa; fails to compile using gcc 4.1.2 It complains about the usage of T::Special for partial specilization of Foo. If Special was a class the solution would be to a typename in front of it. Is there something equivalent to it for enums (or integers)? Thanks, Altan

    Read the article

  • Duplicate array but maintain pointer links

    - by St. John Johnson
    Suppose I have an array of nodes (objects). I need to create a duplicate of this array that I can modify without affecting the source array. But changing the nodes will affect the source nodes. Basically maintaining pointers to the objects instead of duplicating their values. // node(x, y) $array[0] = new node(15, 10); $array[1] = new node(30, -10); $array[2] = new node(-2, 49); // Some sort of copy system $array2 = $array; // Just to show modification to the array doesn't affect the source array array_pop($array2); if (count($array) == count($array2)) echo "Fail"; // Changing the node value should affect the source array $array2[0]->x = 30; if ($array2[0]->x == $array[0]->x) echo "Goal"; What would be the best way to do this?

    Read the article

  • need a virtual template member workaround

    - by yurib
    Hello, I need to write a program implementing the visitor design pattern. The problem is that the base visitor class is a template class. This means that BaseVisited::accept() takes a template class as a parameter and since it uses 'this' and i need 'this' to point to the correct runtime instance of the object, it also needs to be virtual. I'd like to know if there's any way around this problem. template <typename T> class BaseVisitor { public: BaseVisitor(); T visit(BaseVisited *visited); virtual ~BaseVisitor(); } class BaseVisited { BaseVisited(); template <typename T> virtual void accept(BaseVisitor<T> *visitor) { visitor->visit(this); }; // problem virtual ~BaseVisited(); }

    Read the article

  • When convert a void pointer to a specific type pointer, which casting symbol is better, static_cast or reinterpret_cast?

    - by BugCreater
    A beginner question with poor English: Here I got a void* param and want to cast(or change) it to a specific type. But I don't know which "casting symbol" to use. Either**static_cast** and reinterpret_cast works. I want to know which one is better? which one does the Standard C++ recommend? typedef struct { int a; }A, *PA; int foo(void* a) // the real type of a is A* { A* pA = static_cast<A*>(a); // or A* pA = reinterpret_cast<A*>(a);? cout<<pA->a<<endl; return 0; } Here I use A* pA = static_cast(a); or A* pA = reinterpret_cast(a); is more proper?

    Read the article

  • Pointer mysteriously moves

    - by Armen Ablak
    Hi, I have this code for Node rotation and in a line which is marked something happens and I don't really know what and why :). //Test case 30 \ 16 / 29 RotationRight(node->mParent); //call template<class T> void SplayTree<T>::RotationRight(SplayNode<T> *&node) const { SplayNode<T> *left = node->mLeft; SplayNode<T> *parent = node->mParent; node->mLeft = left->mRight; if(left->HasRight()) left->mRight->mParent = node; left->mRight = node; //node in this line points to 0x00445198 {30} left->mParent = node->mParent; //and in this line it points to 0x00444fb8 {16} (node, not node->mParent) node->mParent = left; node = left; } Well, left-mParent points to node also, so I basically do node = node-mParent. The problem is I can't find a work around - how to unpin in from node and change it's pointing address without changing it's.

    Read the article

  • How to serialize a Linq to Sql object graph without hiding the child's "Parent" member

    - by Richard B
    Without hiding the Child object's reference to the Parent object, has anyone been able to use an XmlSerializer() object to move a Linq to SQL object to an XML document, or is the only appropriate way of handling this to create a custom serialization/deserialization class to handle moving the data to/from the xml document? I don't like the idea of hiding the child object's reference to the parent object is why I'm asking. Thx.

    Read the article

  • Doubt on pointer conversion

    - by Simone
    Suppose we have the following code: #include <iostream> struct A { virtual void f() { std::cout << "A::f()" << std::endl; } }; struct B: A { void f() { std::cout << "B::f()" << std::endl; } }; void to_A(void* voidp) { A* aptr = static_cast<A*>(voidp); aptr->f(); } void to_B(void* voidp) { B* bptr2 = static_cast<B*>(voidp); bptr2->f(); } int main() { B* bptr = new B; void* voidp = bptr; to_A(voidp); // prints B::f() to_B(voidp); // prints B::f() } is this code guaranteed to always work as in the code comments or is it UB? AFAIK it should be ok, but I'd like to be reassured.

    Read the article

  • Dereferencing possible null pointer in java

    - by Nealio
    I am just starting to get into graphics and when I am trying to get the graphics, I get the error"Exception in thread "Thread-2" java.lang.NullPointerException" and I have no clue on what is going on! Any help is greatly appreciated. //The display class for the game //Crated: 10-30-2013 //Last Modified: 10-30-2013 package gamedev; import gamedev.Graphics.Render; import gamedev.Graphics.Screen; import java.awt.Canvas; import java.awt.Dimension; import java.awt.Graphics; import java.awt.Toolkit; import java.awt.image.BufferStrategy; import java.awt.image.BufferedImage; import java.awt.image.DataBufferInt; import javax.swing.JFrame; private void tick() { } private void render() { System.out.println("display.render"); BufferStrategy bs = this.getBufferStrategy(); if (bs == null) { createBufferStrategy(3); } for (int i = 0; i < GAMEWIDTH * GAMEHEIGHT; i++) { pixels[i] = screen.PIXELS[i]; } screen.Render(); //The line of code that is the problem Graphics g = bs.getDrawGraphics(); //end problematic code g.drawImage(img, 0, 0, GAMEWIDTH, GAMEHEIGHT, null); g.dispose(); bs.show(); }

    Read the article

  • Indexing with pointer C/C++

    - by Leavenotrace
    Hey I'm trying to write a program to carry out newtons method and find the roots of the equation exp(-x)-(x^2)+3. It works in so far as finding the root, but I also want it to print out the root after each iteration but I can't get it to work, Could anyone point out my mistake I think its something to do with my indexing? Thanks a million :) #include <stdio.h> #include <math.h> #include <malloc.h> //Define Functions: double evalf(double x) { double answer=exp(-x)-(x*x)+3; return(answer); } double evalfprime(double x) { double answer=-exp(-x)-2*x; return(answer); } double *newton(double initialrt,double accuracy,double *data) { double root[102]; data=root; int maxit = 0; root[0] = initialrt; for (int i=1;i<102;i++) { *(data+i)=*(data+i-1)-evalf(*(data+i-1))/evalfprime(*(data+i-1)); if(fabs(*(data+i)-*(data+i-1))<accuracy) { maxit=i; break; } maxit=i; } if((maxit+1==102)&&(fabs(*(data+maxit)-*(data+maxit-1))>accuracy)) { printf("\nMax iteration reached, method terminated"); } else { printf("\nMethod successful"); printf("\nNumber of iterations: %d\nRoot Estimate: %lf\n",maxit+1,*(data+maxit)); } return(data); } int main() { double root,accuracy; double *data=(double*)malloc(sizeof(double)*102); printf("NEWTONS METHOD PROGRAMME:\nEquation: f(x)=exp(-x)-x^2+3=0\nMax No iterations=100\n\nEnter initial root estimate\n>> "); scanf("%lf",&root); _flushall(); printf("\nEnter accuracy required:\n>>"); scanf("%lf",&accuracy); *data= *newton(root,accuracy,data); printf("Iteration Root Error\n "); printf("%d %lf \n", 0,*(data)); for(int i=1;i<102;i++) { printf("%d %5.5lf %5.5lf\n", i,*(data+i),*(data+i)-*(data+i-1)); if(*(data+i*sizeof(double))-*(data+i*sizeof(double)-1)==0) { break; } } getchar(); getchar(); free(data); return(0); }

    Read the article

  • Would a pointer to a pointer to nil match against NULL?

    - by dontWatchMyProfile
    Example: A validation method contains this check to see if an NSError object shall be created or not: - (BOOL)validateCompanyName:(NSString *)newName error:(NSError **)outError { if (outError != NULL) { // do it... Now I pass an NSError object, like this: NSError *error = nil; BOOL ok = [self validateCompanyName:@"Apple" error:&error]; I'm not sure if this matches the check for not NULL. I think it's not NULL, since I believe NULL is not nil. Maybe someone can clear this up?

    Read the article

  • Disallow taking pointer/reference to const to a temporary object in C++ (no C++0X)

    - by KRao
    Hi, I am faced with the following issue. Consider the following class: //Will be similar to bost::reference_wrapper template<class T> class Ref { public: explicit Ref(T& t) : m_ptr(&t) {} private: T* m_ptr; }; and this function returning a double double fun() {return 1.0;} If we now have double x = 1.0; const double xc = 1.0; Ref<double> ref1(x); //OK Ref<const double> refc1(cx); //OK good so far, however: //Ref<double> ref2( fun() ); //Fails as I want it to Ref<const double> refc2( fun() ); //Works but I would like it not to Is there a way to modify Ref (the way you prefer) but not the function fun, so that the last line returns a compile-time error? Please notice you can modify the constructor signature (as long as I am able to initialise the Ref as intended). Thank you in advance for your help!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45  | Next Page >