Search Results

Search found 7666 results on 307 pages for 'pointer to member'.

Page 39/307 | < Previous Page | 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46  | Next Page >

  • Delegates with explicit "this" pointer?

    - by Qwertie
    Is it possible to adapt a method like this function "F" class C { public void F(int i); } to a delegate like Action<C,int>? I have this vague recollection that Microsoft was working on supporting this kind of adaptation. But maybe I misremembered!

    Read the article

  • What does this pointer-heavy C code do?

    - by justRadojko
    Could someone explain to me what should two following lines do: s.httpheaderline[s.httpheaderlineptr] = *(char *)uip_appdata; ++((char *)uip_appdata); This is taken from uIP code for microcontrollers. s - structure httpheaderline - http packet presented as a string httpheadrlineptr - integer value uip_appdata - received ethernet packet (string) If some more info is needed please let me know. BTW. Eclipse is reporting an error on the second line with message Invalid lvalue in increment so i'm trying to figure out how to solve this.

    Read the article

  • Void pointer cast C++ and GTK

    - by Tarantula
    See this GTK callback function: static gboolean callback(GtkWidget *widget, GdkEventButton *event, gpointer *data) { AnyClass *obj = (AnyClass*) data; // using obj works } (please note the gpointer* on the data). And then the signal is connected using: AnyClass *obj2 = new AnyClass(); gtk_signal_connect(/*GTK params (...)*/, callback, obj2); See that the *AnyClass is going to be cast to gpointer* (void**). In fact, this is working now. The callback prototype in GTK documentation is "gpointer data" and not "gpointer *data" as shown in code, what I want to know is: how this can work ? Is this safe ?

    Read the article

  • Cast A primitive type pointer to A structure pointer - Alignment and Padding?

    - by Seçkin Savasçi
    Just 20 minutes age when I answered a question, I come up with an interesting scenario that I'm not sure of the behavior: Let me have an integer array of size n, pointed by intPtr; int* intPtr; and let me also have a struct like this: typedef struct { int val1; int val2; //and less or more integer declarations goes on like this(not any other type) }intStruct; My question is if I do a cast intStruct* structPtr = (intStruct*) intPtr; Am I sure to get every element correctly if I traverse the elements of the struct? Is there any possibility of miss-alignment(possible because of padding) in any architecture/compiler?

    Read the article

  • How to configure IIS7 to Redirect member of An active Directory group to static page

    - by user1759075
    On IIS, we have disabled Anonymous authentication and enabled Windows Authentication What we need is to only allow users who are members of an Active Directory security group to access the Access Point at all. All other users should be directed to a static web page that will give them instructions on how to request access. By adding the security group to the website permissions, and removing the \Users group, we have almost achieved this. Users in the group are allowed through, those not in the group are asked for a (Windows) username and password. Instead of requesting the username and password, we want IIS to redirect them to the static page. Please advise me on how can this be done.

    Read the article

  • Misaligned Pointer Performance

    - by Elite Mx
    Aren't misaligned pointers (in the BEST possible case) supposed to slow down performance and in the worst case crash your program (assuming the compiler was nice enough to compile your invalid c program). Well, the following code doesn't seem to have any performance differences between the aligned and misaligned versions. Why is that? /* brutality.c */ #ifdef BRUTALITY xs = (unsigned long *) ((unsigned char *) xs + 1); #endif ... /* main.c */ #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #define size_t_max ((size_t)-1) #define max_count(var) (size_t_max / (sizeof var)) int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { unsigned long sum, *xs, *itr, *xs_end; size_t element_count = max_count(*xs) >> 4; xs = malloc(element_count * (sizeof *xs)); if(!xs) exit(1); xs_end = xs + element_count - 1; sum = 0; for(itr = xs; itr < xs_end; itr++) *itr = 0; #include "brutality.c" itr = xs; while(itr < xs_end) sum += *itr++; printf("%lu\n", sum); /* we could free the malloc-ed memory here */ /* but we are almost done */ exit(0); } Compiled and tested on two separate machines using gcc -pedantic -Wall -O0 -std=c99 main.c for i in {0..9}; do time ./a.out; done

    Read the article

  • class member access specifiers and binary code

    - by pdehaan
    I understand what the typical access specifiers are, and what they mean. 'public' members are accessible anywhere, 'private' members are accessible only by the same class and friends, etc. What I'm wondering is what, if anything, this equates to in lower-level terms. Are their any post-compilation functional differences between these beyond the high-level restrictions (what can access what) imposed by the language (c++ in this case) they're used in. Another way to put it - if this were a perfect world where programmers always made good choices (like not accessing members that may change later and using only well defined members that should stay the same between implementations), would their be any reason to use these things?

    Read the article

  • unprotected access to member in property get

    - by Lenik
    I have a property public ObservableCollection<string> Name { get { return _nameCache; } } _nameCache is updated by multiple threads in other class methods. The updates are guarded by a lock. The question is: should I use the same lock around my return statement? Will not using a lock lead to a race condition?

    Read the article

  • question regarding "this" pointer in c++

    - by sil3nt
    hello there, i have been given class with int variables x and y in private, and an operator overload function, class Bag{ private: int x; int y; public: Bag(); ~Bag(); //....... //.....etc }; Bag operator+ (Bag new) const{ Bag result(*this); //what does this mean? result.x += new.x; result.y += new.y; } What is the effect of having "Bag result(*this);" there?.

    Read the article

  • C++: Initialization Order for Member Classes

    - by Nikhil
    In the following code, when the ctor of X is called will the ctor of A or B be called first? Does the order in which they are placed in the body of the class control this? If somebody can provide a snippet of text from the C++ standard that talks about this issue, that would be perfect. class A; class B; class X { private: A a; B b; }

    Read the article

  • C/C++ opaque pointer library

    - by aaa
    hello Is there library/header already written to manage C++ objects from C using opaque pointers/handles? I can write one myself, but I would rather use already made solution, especially if it has fortran bindings. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Why do I get a Null Pointer Exception?

    - by Roman
    I have this code: Manager manager = new Manager("Name"); MyWindowListener windowListener = new MyWindowListener(); manager.addWindowListener(windowListener); Eclipse writes that I have a NullPointerException in the last line. What can be the reason for that. I do have constructors in the Manager and MyWindowListener. If it's important MyWindowListener implements WindowListener.

    Read the article

  • Doubt regarding usage of array as a pointer in C

    - by Som
    For eg. I have an array of structs 'a' as below: struct mystruct{ int b int num; }; struct bigger_struct { struct my_struct a[10]; } struct bigger_struct *some_var; i know that the name of an array when used as a value implicitly refers to the address of the first element of the array.(Which is how the array subscript operator works at-least) Can i know do the other way around i.e if i do: some_var->a->b, it should be equivalent to some_var->a[0]->b, am i right? I have tested this and it seems to work , but is this semantically 100% correct?

    Read the article

  • Extract inputs from a pointer to array of characters in C / C++

    - by user2066884
    I am writing a command line utility but I cannot find a way to store the commands and arguments. so far I have the following but I get a Segmentation fault: int main(void) { char *command; char *args[MAX_LINE/2 + 1]; int should_run = 1; do{ cout << "cmd> "; int counter = 0; while(cin >> command) { strcpy(args[counter],command); counter++; } cout << args[0] << "\n"; } }

    Read the article

  • Obtaining frame pointer in C

    - by assketchum
    I'm trying to get the FP in my C program, I tried two different ways, but they both differ from what I get when I run GDB. The first way I tried, I made a protocol function in C for the Assembly function: int* getEbp(); and my code looks like this: int* ebp = getEbp(); printf("ebp: %08x\n", ebp); // value i get here is 0xbfe2db58 while( esp <= ebp ) esp -= 4; printf( "ebp: %08x, esp" ); //value i get here is 0xbfe2daec My assembly code getEbp: movl %ebp, %eax ret I tried making the prototype function to just return an int, but that also doesn't match up with my GDB output. We are using x86 assembly. EDIT: typos, and my getEsp function looks exactly like the other one: getEsp: movl %esp, %eax ret

    Read the article

  • cant figure out pointer assignment in c

    - by vadiklk
    int add(char *var1, char *var2, char **var3) { int num1, num2, length1 = strlen(var1), length2 = strlen(var2), length = max(length1, length2) + 1; char *result = (char*) calloc(length, sizeof(char)); ... free(*var3); *var3 = result; return 0; } out side of the function i get its still nothing(var3); more detail: int addSubCommand(char **vars, int isAdd) { ... return add(vars[index1], var2, &(vars[index3])); } that's where i call add. the char** vars goes from every function to the other.

    Read the article

  • Friendly way to override `const`-overloaded member function?

    - by xtofl
    Given a base class class A { int i; public: int& f(){ return i;} const int& f() const { return i;} }; And a sub class class ConstA : private A { public: const int& f() const { return A::f(); } }; Is there a wrist-friendly way to access the ConstA::f method on a non-const variable? ConstA ca; int i = ca.f(); // compile error: int& A::f() is not accessible since A is privately inherited int j = static_cast<const ConstA&>(ca).f(); // this works, but it hurts a little... Or is it so ugly since hiding A::f generally is a bad idea, violating the Liskov Substitution Principle: any subclass of A must at least be capable of all A's functionality? void set( A& a, int i ) { a.f() = i; } class ConstA2 : public A { private: int& f(){ return A::f(); } }; ConstA2 ca2; set( ca2, 1 ); (Note: this question popped up while thinking about this question)

    Read the article

  • I'm new to C++. Please Help me with the Linked List (What functions to add)?

    - by Igal
    DEAR All; Hi, I'm just beginner to C++; Please help me to understand: What functions should be in the Linked list class ? I think there should be overloaded operators << and ; Please help me to improve the code (style, errors, etc,) Thanks for advance. Igal. Please review the small code for the integer List (enclosed MyNODE.h and ListDriver1.cpp); MyNODE.h // This is my first attempt to write linked list. Igal Spector, June 2010. #include <iostream.h> #include <assert.h> //Forward Declaration of the classes: class ListNode; class TheLinkedlist; // Definition of the node (WITH IMPLEMENTATION !!!, without test drive): class ListNode{ friend class TheLinkedlist; public: // constructor: ListNode(const int& value, ListNode *next= 0); // note: no destructor, as this handled by TheLinkedList class. // accessor: return data in the node. // int Show() const {return theData;} private: int theData; //the Data ListNode* theNext; //points to the next node in the list. }; //Implementations: //constructor: inline ListNode::ListNode(const int &value,ListNode *next) :theData(value),theNext(next){} //end of ListNode class, now for the LL class: class TheLinkedlist { public: //constructors: TheLinkedlist(); virtual ~TheLinkedlist(); // Accessors: void InsertAtFront(const &); void AppendAtBack(const &); // void InOrderInsert(const &); bool IsEmpty()const;//predicate function void Print() const; private: ListNode * Head; //pointer to first node ListNode * Tail; //pointer to last node. }; //Implementation: //Default constructor inline TheLinkedlist::TheLinkedlist():Head(0),Tail(0) {} //Destructor inline TheLinkedlist::~TheLinkedlist(){ if(!IsEmpty()){ //list is not empty cout<<"\n\tDestroying Nodes"<<endl; ListNode *currentPointer=Head, *tempPtr; while(currentPointer != 0){ //Delete remaining Nodes. tempPtr=currentPointer; cout<<"The node: "<<tempPtr->theData <<" is Destroyed."<<endl<<endl; currentPointer=currentPointer->theNext; delete tempPtr; } Head=Tail = 0; //don't forget this, as it may be checked one day. } } //Insert the Node to the beginning of the list: void TheLinkedlist::InsertAtFront(const int& value){ ListNode *newPtr = new ListNode(value,Head); assert(newPtr!=0); if(IsEmpty()) //list is empty Head = Tail = newPtr; else { //list is NOT empty newPtr->theNext = Head; Head = newPtr; } } //Insert the Node to the beginning of the list: void TheLinkedlist::AppendAtBack(const int& value){ ListNode *newPtr = new ListNode(value, NULL); assert(newPtr!=0); if(IsEmpty()) //list is empty Head = Tail = newPtr; else { //list is NOT empty Tail->theNext = newPtr; Tail = newPtr; } } //is the list empty? inline bool TheLinkedlist::IsEmpty() const { return (Head == 0); } // Display the contents of the list void TheLinkedlist::Print()const{ if ( IsEmpty() ){ cout << "\n\t The list is empty!!"<<endl; return; } ListNode *tempPTR = Head; cout<<"\n\t The List is: "; while ( tempPTR != 0 ){ cout<< tempPTR->theData <<" "; tempPTR = tempPTR->theNext; } cout<<endl<<endl; } ////////////////////////////////////// The test Driver: //Driver test for integer Linked List. #include <iostream.h> #include "MyNODE.h" // main Driver int main(){ cout<< "\n\t This is the test for integer LinkedList."<<endl; const int arraySize=11, ARRAY[arraySize]={44,77,88,99,11,2,22,204,50,58,12}; cout << "\n\tThe array is: "; //print the numbers. for (int i=0;i<arraySize; i++) cout<<ARRAY[i]<<", "; TheLinkedlist list; //declare the list for(int index=0;index<arraySize;index++) list.AppendAtBack( ARRAY[index] );//create the list cout<<endl<<endl; list.Print(); //print the list return 0; //end of the program. }

    Read the article

  • How do I output an individual character when using char *[] = "something"

    - by Matt
    I've been playing with pointers to better understand them and I came across something I think I should be able to do, but can't sort out how. The code below works fine - I can output "a", "dog", "socks", and "pants" - but what if I wanted to just output the 'o' from "socks"? How would I do that? char *mars[4] = { "a", "dog", "sock", "pants" }; for ( int counter = 0; counter < 4; counter++ ) { cout << mars[ counter ]; } Please forgive me if the question is answered somewhere - there are 30+ pages of C++ pointer related question, and I spent about 90 minutes looking through them, as well as reading various (very informative) articles, before deciding to ask.

    Read the article

  • C++ object in memory

    - by Neo_b
    Hello. Is there a standard in storing a C++ objects in memory? I wish to set a char* pointer to a certain address in memory, so that I can read certain objects' variables directly from the memory byte by byte. When I am using Dev C++, the variables are stored one by one right in the memory address of an object in the order that they were defined. Now, can it be different while using a different compiler (like the variables being in a different order, or somewhere else)? Thank you in advance. :-)

    Read the article

  • fill a buffer successively

    - by mkind
    i intend to fill a char-pointer array successively in a for-loop. the content to fill in is a integer so i need to cast. but i didn't get the result i want to.. for (i=0;i<max0;i++){ sprintf(buf, "%d", content[i]); } sprintf replaces the hole buf, but i want to append. for (i=0;i<max0;i++){ buf[i]=(char) contint[i] } but this isn't working too. it seems to me, i get ascii-code of the content[i].

    Read the article

  • C++ How do you set an array of pointers to null in an initialiser list like way?

    - by boredjoe
    I am aware you cannot use an initialiser list for an array. However I have heard of ways that you can set an array of pointers to NULL in a way that is similar to an initialiser list. I am not certain how this is done. I have heard that a pointer is set to NULL by default, though I do not know if this is guaranteed/ in the C++ standard. I am also not sure if initialising through the new operator compared to normal allocation can make a difference too.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46  | Next Page >