Search Results

Search found 1178 results on 48 pages for 'w3c'.

Page 4/48 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Describe repeating XML nodes in W3C XML Schema?

    - by NotMyName
    I have an XML document like: <Root> <Bravo /> <Alpha /> <Charlie /> <Charlie /> <Delta /> <Foxtrot /> <Charlie /> </Root> The order of the nodes does not matter. Each node may appear zero or one times, except for Charlie. Charlie may appear zero, one, or arbitrarily many times. The straightforward way to express this in XSD is: <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xsd:element name="Root"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:all> <xsd:element name="Alpha" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" /> <xsd:element name="Bravo" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" /> <xsd:element name="Charlie" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> <xsd:element name="Delta" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" /> <xsd:element name="Echo" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" /> <xsd:element name="Foxtrot" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" /> </xsd:all> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> </xsd:schema> But this does not work, because xsd:all does not allow for maxOccurs greater than 1. Since I cannot use xsd:all, what should I use?

    Read the article

  • http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/org/w3c/dom/Document.html#getDoctype()

    - by Tom Brito
    The Document class have a getDoctype method but doesn't have a setDoctype. The documentation says: The DOM Level 2 does not support editing the Document Type Declaration. docType cannot be altered in any way, including through the use of methods inherited from the Node interface, such as insertNode or removeNode. and in my project I need to generate xml files with my specified doctypes. I've tryied to create my own DefaultNode, but it throws "DOMException: Method not supported" for the setters. Any idea?

    Read the article

  • W3C dom api in Java

    - by Benju
    Take a look at the example code... NodeList folderNodes = document.getElementsByTagName("Folder"); DocumentFragment node = (DocumentFragment) folderNodes.item(0); It was very easy to do "getElementsByTagName" on the document but when I want to do this again on the DocumentFragment it seems I cannot. How do I go about furthering this query?

    Read the article

  • JQuery form validator that is W3C Valid

    - by Rudiger
    Im doing some form validation on a website and I've tried to use JQuery Validator and it works find but isn't valid as it uses custom attributes. I've tried every which way to make it valid but it seems besides some other custom javascript, which is not an option, it isn't valid. Has anyone come across one that is valid? Or some other way to make it valid? I've tried custom dtds, adding the attribute to the doctype but that leaves a ] on the page. Cheers

    Read the article

  • Why can't I start XML entity names with 'xml''?

    - by flamey
    <XmlInfo /> I ran into problem using Perl's popular SOAP::Lite module, where it wouldn't accept XML entity names starting with "xml" (regardles letters' case). The author of the module replied to email saying that entity names starting with "xml" are not permitted in XML specification, but I couldn't find it in W3C's documents for 1.0 and 1.1 specs, I also couldn't find it in any of the articles or guidelines docs about XML entity naming. In fact some guideline documents used names starting with xml as an example, and lots of people are using it, as I see via Google Code Search. So are there any restrictions (besides which characters to use as defined in W3C's documents) in Entity naming in XML? Is there a restriction saying you can't name entities starting with "xml"?

    Read the article

  • « Le rejet des DRM risque de cloisonner le Web » pour le PDG du W3C, qui trouve que la spécification EME est un juste compromis

    Le W3C étudie une norme pour la lecture du contenu protégé dans le HTML5 qualifiée de « contraire à l'éthique » par un membre du consortiumDes développeurs de Google, Microsoft et Netflix ont proposé une nouvelle norme pour le HTML5.Le futur standard du Web HTML5 qui est de plus en plus utilisé au détriment des technologies comme Flash ou Silverlight souffre encore de quelques manquements par rapport à celles-ci. C'est le cas par exemple pour la lecture du contenu vidéo protégé.Une nouvelle proposition a été faite au W3C par David Dorwin (Google), Adrian Bateman (Microsoft) et Mark Watson (Netflix) pour permettre au HTML5 de lire du contenu protégé DRM (Digital rights management ).Bapti...

    Read the article

  • Le W3C publie le standard EXI, une nouvelle norme qui étend la portée du XML aux applications et terminaux mobiles

    Le W3C publie le standard EXI Une nouvelle norme qui étend la portée du XML aux applications et terminaux mobiles Le W3C (World Wide Consortium) vient de publier une nouvelle norme compacte du XML (eXtensible Markup Language) qui sera utilisée sur les terminaux mobiles et autres appareils ayant des contraintes de mémoire et/ou de bande passante. Le nouveau standard EXI (Efficient XML Interchange) a pour but d'optimiser nettement la performance, l'efficacité réseau et la consommation d'énergie des applications utilisant XML. Le standard XML est largement utilisé en tant que format d'échange de données entre différents systèmes, services Web et appareils. Mais il n'est pas adopté su...

    Read the article

  • Le W3C valide une spécification sur la confidentialité des internautes proposée par Microsoft, la normalisation du standard commence

    Le W3C valide une nouvelle spécification proposée par Microsoft Pour lutter contre le traçage des internautes Un nouveau standard Web, fondé sur la fonctionnalité « Tracking protection » d'Internet Explorer 9 pour aider les utilisateurs à mieux contrôler le traçage de leur activité en ligne, avait été proposée par Microsoft au W3C. Elle vient d'être validée. Dans un billet, Microsoft affirme que l'organisme de normalisation responsable de la définition des standards du Web a récemment porté son attention sur la protection de la vie privée en ligne et a trouvé sa proposition « opportune et en phase avec ses propres objectifs et priorités ». Pour Dean Hachamovitch, vic...

    Read the article

  • Le HTML 5 sera publié en 2014, le HTML 5.1 en 2016, le W3C sortira une nouvelle norme tous les 2 ans

    Le HTML 5 sera publié en 2014, le HTML 5.1 en 2016 le W3C adopte un cycle de développement continu avec la sortie tous les deux ans d'une nouvelle norme Le W3C, l'organisme de normalisation du Web vient de publier une feuille de route détaillée pour la spécification HTML5. Né en 2004, le langage est vu comme la future norme basée sur les technologies Web natives et standardisées qui mettra fin à l'utilisation de nombreux plugins et ouvrira la voie au développement multiplateforme sur une base de code unique. Le langage avait atteint en février 2011 le stade du "dernier appel" (Last Call) correspondant à la satisfaction des exigences techniques et le début d'un vaste exa...

    Read the article

  • Le HTML5 passe en "Candidate Recommendation" avec Canvas2D, le W3C verrouille les fonctions et lance le HTML 5.1

    Le HTML 5 passe en « Candidate Recommendation » avec Canvas2D le W3C verrouille les fonctionnalités et lance la spécification HTML 5.1 La norme du Web HTML5 vient de franchir une étape importante dans son processus de standardisation. Le World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) vient d'annoncer officiellement la finalisation des spécifications HTML5 et Canvas2D, qui sont désormais disponibles en « Candidate Recommendation ». Cela signifie que les fonctionnalités sont verrouillées et que de futurs changements importants sont peu probables. Les entreprises et les développeurs peuvent donc utiliser ces spécifications pour la « mise en oeuvre et la planification ». Cette étape ma...

    Read the article

  • « Responsive Images » : afficher des tailles d'images qui varient avec les écrans, le W3C publie un nouveau projet de spécification HTML

    HTML : afficher des tailles d'images différentes en fonction des écrans Le W3C publie un projet de spécification pour des « Responsive Images » L'heure est au « Responsive » pour le développement de sites Web. Après le Responsive Design ? qui fait varier le nombre de colonnes et modifie les contenus à afficher en fonction de la taille de la fenêtre ? voici le HTML Responsive Images Extension. Ce projet du W3C vise à normaliser la manière d'afficher des tailles d'images différentes en fonction de la taille de la fenêtre de navigation et de la résolution de l'écran. Concrètement, f...

    Read the article

  • An error has occurred opening extern DTD (w3.org, xhtml1-transitional.dtd). 503 Server Unavailable

    - by Cheeso
    I'm trying to do xpath queries over an xhtml document. The document looks like this: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> .... </head> <body> ... </body> </html> Because the document includes various char entities (&nbsp; and so on), I need to use the DTD, in order to load it with an XmlReader. So my code looks like this: var reader = XmlReader.Create(sr, new XmlReaderSettings { ProhibitDtd = false }); But when I run this, it returns An error has occurred while opening external DTD 'http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1-transitional.dtd': The remote server returned an error: (503) Server Unavailable. Now, I know why I am getting the 503 error. W3C explained it very clearly. But I still want to validate the document. How can I validate with the DTD, and get the entity definitions, without hitting the w3.org website? related: - java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 503

    Read the article

  • Are inline style bad for screen readers?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    Example <span style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffd700">Background color</span> How screen reader handle inline css ? is there any other cons of inline CSS except css management? Inline styles are valid also . i tested with W3C Validator and with XHTML 1.0 Strict doctype? <p><span style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">Left indent</span></p>

    Read the article

  • How to validate my Alexa code <noscript> tag in Head section

    - by Naveen Valecha
    The doctype and HTML tag of my page is below: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-2.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" version="XHTML+RDFa 1.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/SCHEMA/xhtml-rdfa-2.xsd" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

    Read the article

  • FileZilla is saying there is an error in the W3.org link!

    - by Anonymous the Great
    I just got my free web hosting set up (trigoblocks.comuf.com), I connected via FileZilla FTP and uploaded my files. The error I get is "Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING in /home/a3639879/public_html/header.php on line 1". Header.php line 1-2: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> I do not get this error while on localhost with XAMPP.

    Read the article

  • What is the most semantic way to display a street address in HTML?

    - by tomk
    I have an address that is going to be displayed on a webpage, but it is not the address for the author of the page. How should this be coded to be semantic given the w3c recommendation of: The ADDRESS element may be used by authors to supply contact information for a document or a major part of a document such as a form. This element often appears at the beginning or end of a document.

    Read the article

  • How to Create A Document Type Definition

    - by DaveDev
    Hi Guys I've been creating a lot of my own custom attributes in my XHTML documents lately, and am aware that because they are custom attributes, they won't validate against the W3C standard. Isn't it true that I can specify my own DTD to make it validate? If so, can anyone tell me what's involved in doing this in an ASP.NET MVC app? Thanks Dave

    Read the article

  • URL BNF search part does not make sense

    - by Asaf Mesika
    Hi, While implementing a Java regular expression for URL based on the URL BNF published by W3C, I've failed to understand the search part. As quoted: httpaddress h t t p : / / hostport [ / path ] [ ? search ] search xalphas [ + search ] xalphas xalpha [ xalphas ] xalpha alpha | digit | safe | extra | escape alpha a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | digit 0 |1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 safe $ | - | _ | @ | . | & | + | - extra ! | * | " | ' | ( | ) | , Search claims it is xalphas seperated by a plus sign. xalphas can contain plus signs by it self, as claimed by safe. Thus according to my understanding , it should be: search xalphas Where am I wrong here?

    Read the article

  • Gecko/Firefox support for HTML5 Notifications

    - by jAndy
    Hi Folks, I'm wondering if there is any build-in support for the HTML5 Notification feature in Gecko browsers so far? Maybe some hidden developer thingy ? I'm aware of WebKits window.webkitNotifications which works great, so, is there a Firefox implementation ? update After searching and reading some w3c HTML5 specs, I'm maybe a little bit off here. I can't find any Notification feature anywhere there. Am I facing wrong facts here? Is that just a "very own webkit implementation" ?

    Read the article

  • Getting w3validation error

    - by Dinesh
    I am trying to validate my page and getting the following w3 validation error for the following line, <li ><a href="javascript:void(0);"title="Test 33">Test 33</a> - attributes construct error - Couldn't find end of Start Tag a line ..... - Opening and ending tag mismatch: li line ... and a I am using following doctype <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Whats wrong with code ? Kindly advice on this.

    Read the article

  • HTML5: HTML VS XHTML spec question regarding comments

    - by NoozNooz42
    In the W3C working draft for HTML5 here's a line I find confusing: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/introduction.html#html-vs-xhtml Comments that contain the string "--" can be represented in the DOM but not in the HTML syntax or in XML. I can interpret this in two different ways: Comments that contain the string "--" can be represented in XML and in the DOM but not in the HTML syntax Comments that contain the string"--" can be represented in the DOM but neither in the HTML syntax nor in XML. I really find the original formulation highly confusing. Which one does it mean and is it even correct english? Who should I contact if I want to point out that I find such a wording highly confusing and that hence there's a high probability that other non-native english speaker would find this kind of formulation highly confusing too?

    Read the article

  • To what point is making an HTML page valid worth it?

    - by Martín Fixman
    Since a long time ago, when I found out about the W3C Validator, I made sure every HTML document I made was valid HTML. However, I think sometimes it just isn't necessary to waste time making it valid. Of course, for actual Internet pages may be important, but is making pages on an Intranet, or even little front-ends that are used with other programs, when the HTML page renders correctly in the most used browsers (not necessarily counting IE 6 and 7). I think I'm mostly talking about little improvements over code, such as wrapping every shown element of the page on <p> or <div> tags.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >