Search Results

Search found 1178 results on 48 pages for 'w3c'.

Page 5/48 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • XHTML Strict 1.0 - target="_blank" not valid?

    - by Mutherphucker Mike
    I just validated my actual XHTML Strict 1.0 doc with the w3c validator service.. and it says that, <ul id="socialnetwork"> <li><a href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank"></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.flickr.com" target="_blank"></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.xing.com" target="_blank"></a></li> <li><a href="http://www.rss.com" target="_blank"></a></li> </ul> the target="_blank" is not valid.. but I need the target blank so a new tab will open in the browser, so that the user does not leave the main page. What can I do? Why is this not valid?

    Read the article

  • How to get rid of this w3 validation error?

    - by Pandiya Chendur
    I developed a web page and now i am validating it with w3c HTML4.0... I got one error it says Error Line 30, Column 57: there is no attribute "DATA-FLEXMENU" href="about.php" class="mainlink" data-flexmenu="flexmenu1">About Us</a></div> You have used the attribute named above in your document, but the document type you are using does not support that attribute for this element. This error is often caused by incorrect use of the "Strict" document type with a document that uses frames (e.g. you must use the "Transitional" document type to get the "target" attribute), or by using vendor proprietary extensions such as "marginheight" (this is usually fixed by using CSS to achieve the desired effect instead). Any ways of getting rid of this error .... Any suggestion...

    Read the article

  • HTML5 : version finale pour 2014, un report est nécessaire pour développer une suite de tests d'interopérabilité d'après le W3C

    HTML5 : version finale pour 2014 Un report est nécessaire pour développer une suite de tests d'interopérabilité d'après le WC3 Mise à jour du 15/02/2011 par Idelways L'HTML5 ne sera pas prêt avant 2014 d'après la nouvelle charte de son groupe de travail aux W3C, le consortium en charge des spécifications sur lequel s'appuiera le futur du développement Web. Le standard ouvert devrait atteindre le stade du « dernier appel » (Last Call) en mai prochain, une étape charnière qui correspond à la satisfaction des exigences techniques. Les communautés des développeurs seront dès lors appelées à commenter les spéci...

    Read the article

  • Le W3C valide le standard CSS Media Queries, pour l'affichage dynamique des pages Web en fonction des tailles d'écran

    Le W3C valide le standard CSS Media Queries permettant d'adapter dynamiquement des pages Web en fonction des tailles d'écran Avec la prolifération des terminaux de différentes tailles d'écran (tablettes, téléphones mobiles, etc.), les développeurs Web faisaient face à un problème d'adaptation de l'affichage de leur site en fonction de la taille de l'écran du dispositif d'exécution. Les CSS Medias Queries introduits par CSS 3, ont permis de résoudre ce problème en définissant des techniques pour l'application de feuilles de styles en fonction des périphériques de consultation utilisés. Cette fonctionnalité offre aux développeurs des moyens permettant de définir des règles d'afficha...

    Read the article

  • Le forum (x)HTML devient « Balisage (X)HTML et validation W3C », un changement pour mieux refléter sa finalité

    Comme vous avez peut-être constaté, le forum (x)HTML a changé de nom pour devenir Balisage (X)HTML et validation W3C.Cette modification a été faite pour essayer de refléter au mieux la finalité de ce forum. Le nouveau nom choisi met plus en avant les notions de balisage et de validation.En effet, le forum n'est pas uniquement destiné à répondre à vos questions, mais aussi à essayer de vous guider vers les meilleures pratiques actuelles qui sont dépendantes de ces deux notions.En revanche, bien...

    Read the article

  • How do you write Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict code when you are using javascript to fill an element that r

    - by Tim Visher
    I'm running my site through the W3C's validator trying to get it to validate as XHTML 1.0 Strict and I've gotten down to a particularly sticky (at least in my experience) validation error. I'm including certain badges from various services in the site that provide their own API and code for inclusion on an external site. These badges use javascript (for the most part) to fill an element that you insert in the markup which requires a child. This means that in the end, perfectly valid markup is generated, but to the validator, all it sees is an incomplete parent-child tag which it then throws an error on. As a caveat, I understand that I could complain to the services that their badges don't validate. Sans this, I assume that someone has validated their code while including badges like this, and that's what I'm interested in. Answers such as, 'Complain to Flickr about their badge' aren't going to help me much. An additional caveat: I would prefer that as much as possible the markup remains semantic. I.E. Adding an empty li tag or tr-td pair to make it validate would be an undesirable solution, even though it may be necessary. If that's the only way it can be made to validate, oh well, but please lean answers towards semantic markup. As an example: <div id="twitter_div"> <h2><a href="http://twitter.com/stopsineman">@Twitter</a></h2> <ul id="twitter_update_list"> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://twitter.com/javascripts/blogger.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://twitter.com/statuses/user_timeline/stopsineman.json?callback=twitterCallback2&amp;count=1"></script> </ul> </div> Notice the ul tags wrapping the javascript. This eventually gets filled in with lis via the script, but to the validator it only sees the unpopulated ul. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Why is this UL and inline JS giving errors during HTML validation?

    - by thor
    I've just run the homepage of a site I'm working on through the w3c HTML validator and it's come back with 3 errors and 2 warnings. I've taken a look at them but can't see why they would be causing a problem. I've pasted them in below (I've removed URL's/strings etc as the site isn't quite ready to be made public yet). This is being validated against XHTML Transitional by the way. The UL comes back with the following error: end tag for "ul" which is not finished <ul id='tabs'></ul> <ul id='tabs'> <li> <a href="/en/folder/folder/search?categories[]=cat1" class="tab1" title="tab_title"> <img alt="img_alt" src="img_src" /> <span> tab1_text </span> </a> </li> <li> <a href="/en/folder/folder/search?categories[]=cat2" class="tab2" title="tab_title"> <img alt="img_alt" src="img_src" /> <span> tab2_text </span> </a> </li> <li> <a href="/en/folder/folder/search?categories[]=cat3" class="tab3" title="tab_title"> <img alt="img_alt" src="img_src" /> <span> tab3_text </span> </a> </li> <li> <a href="/en/folder/folder/search?categories[]=cat4" class="tab4" title="tab_title"> <img alt="img_alt" src="img_src" /> <span> tab4_text </span> </a> </li> <li> <a href="/en/folder/folder/search?categories[]=cat5" class="tab5" title="tab_title"> <img alt="img_alt" src="img_src" /> <span> tab5_text </span> </a> </li> <li> <a href="/en/folder/folder/search?categories[]=cat6" class="tab6" title="tab_title"> <img alt="img_alt" src="img_src" /> <span> tab6_text </span> </a> </li> <li> <a href="/en/folder/folder/search?categories[]=cat7" class="tab7" title="tab_title"> <img alt="img_alt" src="img_src" /> <span> tab7_text </span> </a> </li> <li> <a href="/en/folder/folder/search?categories[]=cat8" class="tab8" title="tab_title"> <img alt="img_alt" src="img_src" /> <span> tab8_text </span> </a> </li> </ul> For the inline javascript, I'm getting 2 errors and 2 warnings all for the same thing - I have a simple if statement with && and the validator appears to be seeing this as HTML rather than javascript: character "&amp;" is the first character of a delimiter but occurred as data and xmlParseEntityRef: no name <script type='text/javascript'> if (weather_data != null && weather_data['data'] != null){ display_weather(); } </script> The javascript is placed just before the body close tag at the end of the document. If you need to see the full source then let me know and I can send it over.

    Read the article

  • CSS3 : de l'accélération matérielle graphique pour les filtres sur Chromium, le W3C donne le feu vert au retrait des préfixes propriétaires

    CSS3 : de l'accélération matérielle graphique pour les filtres sur Chromium Le W3C donne le feu vert au retrait des préfixes propriétaires Deux, trois filtres CSS3 font freezer l'écran sur la plus récente version stable de votre navigateur ultra-moderne ? Et mettent en branle les ventilateurs de l'ordinateur dès qu'ils sont couplés à une pincée de transitions ? Vous vous dites que Flash a encore de beaux jours devant lui ? Ça commence à changer ! En tout cas pour les utilisateurs de Google Chrome et de son moteur de rendu Webkit. Le blog officiel de Chromium (le logiciel libre d'où est directement issu Chrome) nous annonce l'intégration de l'accélération matérielle graphiqu...

    Read the article

  • Dot Not Track ne doit pas être activé par défaut pour le W3C, Microsoft campe sur sa position et maintient son activation dans IE 10

    Dot Not Track ne doit pas être activé par défaut pour le W3C Microsoft campe sur sa position et maintient l'activation de la fonction dans IE 10 Mise à jour du 20/06/2012, par Hinautl Romaric Microsoft a opté, pour Internet Explorer 10, pour l'activation par défaut de la fonctionnalité Dot Not Track (DNT). Le but étant de protéger la vie privée des utilisateurs, la fonction Dot Not Track rajoute une entête HTTP visant à désactiver le suivi des utilisateurs par les applications web, utile pour effectuer de la publicité ciblée. Le choix opéré par Microsoft a entrainé une vague de critiques des annonc...

    Read the article

  • How to digitally sign XML document using Oracle 9i PL/SQL

    - by Andris Krauze
    Let's say we have a simple XML document (doc.xml) like this: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <Envelope xmlns="http://www.someexample.com/examples"> <Salutation Id="test"> Welcome! </Salutation> </Envelope> And a certificate file:test.p12 How to make a solution using Oracle 9i PL/SQL that digitally signs XML document according to http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig# Any Digital Signature form (e.g. Enveloped) and method (e.g. RSAwithSHA1) example would be great.

    Read the article

  • In XMLHttpRequest, where is error flag variable?

    - by Tiangolo
    In the XMLHttpRequest Spec it says that: The DONE state has an associated error flag that indicates some type of network error or abortion. It can be either true or false and has an initial value of false. Also says something similar about a "send() flag" in an "OPENED" state. It's said in the specification but not in the IDL and when I create a new XMLHttpRequest I can't find those "flags". Where are those boolean variables?

    Read the article

  • Why WCAG made 3 level "A", "AA" and "AAA"?

    - by jitendra
    What is the purpose of making 3 priority level by WCAG? is it like? If client not paying extra or if we don't have much time then go for A If client paying then or if we have time to make site compatible go for at least AA If client paying and needed according to govt. rules then go for AAA If we are making site then which level we should we try to achieve, or we should do only on client request? Although i found these definitions on this site but these are confusing for me • Priority 1: For all users to access the Web content and for Web developers to attain Conformance level “A”, these requirements must be satisfied. • Priority 2: These requirements should be satisfied by the Web developers so that no group finds it difficult to access the Web content and so as to attain Conformance level “AA”. • Priority 3: These requirements may be satisfied by the Web developers to facilitate access to Web content for some groups and attain Conformance level “AAA”.

    Read the article

  • What is the point of CSS collapsing margins?

    - by Tom
    The CSS2 box model tells us that adjoining margins collapse. I find it quite annoying, being the source of many design bugs. I hope that by understanding the purpose of collapsing margins, I will understand when to use them and how to avoid them when they are not needed. What is the purpose of this feature?

    Read the article

  • Adding HTML to the DOM through the client.

    - by Mantorok
    Hi all Just wanted your views on the most efficient way to render content on demand, the reason this has come to light is that I'm maintaining a AA compliant website and we recently added video to it, and one of the techniques to avoid invalidation was to add the HTML for the video to the DOM after the page has loaded - which is fine and working ok. However, I found 2 possible techniques and I would appreciate some views, the one I'm currently using is an AJAX call that returns the HTML, the other technique is a hidden field that contains the HTML - I'm presently using the former. The main reason I'm asking the question is because there may be times when this particular control is also requested via an AJAX call, so I would end up with back-to-back AJAX calls, which seems a bit inefficient to me. I hope this makes sense, are there any better techniques to achieve this? Am I worrying too much over the consecutive AJAX calls? Thanks

    Read the article

  • unable to cope with the asynchronous nature of navigator.geolocation.

    - by Raja
    Hi all I'm using the navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(function) api in firefox 3.6. When i try to call this method repeatedly I see that sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. I figured that the problem is because of its asynchronous callback nature. I can see that the callback function is being called at some point but my outer function is already exiting so i cannot catch the values of the position coordinates. I'm pretty new to javascript so i'm assuming other javascript coders might have already figured out how to deal with it. Please help. Thanks

    Read the article

  • CSS3 box-shadow + inset + RGBA

    - by mkotechno
    I'm doing some tests with new features of CSS3, but this combination only works in lastest versions of Chrome and Firefox, but not in Safari or Opera: box-shadow: inset 0px -10px 20px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5); -webkit-box-shadow: inset 0px -10px 20px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5); -moz-box-shadow: inset 0px -10px 20px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5); I really don't know if they fails in the box-shadow itself, in the inset parameter, or in RGBA color. It's a syntax error or simply Safari and Opera lacks on this?

    Read the article

  • Best Way to View Generated Source of Webpage?

    - by jeremy
    I'm looking for a tool that will give me the proper generated source including DOM changes made by AJAX requests for input into W3's validator. I've tried the following methods: Web Developer Toolbar - Generates invalid source according to the doc-type (e.g. it removes the self closing portion of tags). Loses the doctype portion of the page. Firebug - Fixes potential flaws in the source (e.g. unclosed tags). Also loses doctype portion of tags and injects the console which itself is invalid HTML. IE Developer Toolbar - Generates invalid source according to the doc-type (e.g. it makes all tags uppercase, against XHTML spec). Highlight + View Selection Source - Frequently difficult to get the entire page, also excludes doc-type. Is there any program or add-on out there that will give me the exact current version of the source, without fixing or changing it in some way? So far, Firebug seems the best, but I worry it may fix some of my mistakes. Solution It turns out there is no exact solution to what I wanted as Justin explained. The best solution seems to be to validate the source inside of Firebug's console, even though it will contain some errors caused by Firebug. I'd also like to thank Forgotten Semicolon for explaining why "View Generated Source" doesn't match the actual source. If I could mark 2 best answers, I would.

    Read the article

  • not able to solve markup problem

    - by pradeep
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fratingscorner.com%2Fproduct_rating.php%3Falias%3DPeoples-Education-Society-Institute-of-Technology-%28PESIT%29-100-feet-Ring-Road-Bangalore%26product%3DColleges&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&ss=1&outline=1&group=1&No200=1&verbose=1&st=1&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.767 have fixed most of the errors . but could not fix the » problems ...if any1 can help it will be helpful for me.

    Read the article

  • W3 xHTML Validation Errors on jQuery code!

    - by Chris
    I have some jQuery code that, without it in the document it passes validation fine, but with it in it causes errors. The code in question is here: $.ajax({ type: "GET", url: "data.xml", dataType: "xml", success: function(xml) { //Update error info errors = $(xml).find("Errors").find("*").filter(function () { return $(this).children().length === 0; }); if (errors.length == 0) { statuscontent = "<img src='/web/resources/graphics/accept.png' alt='' /> System OK"; } else { statuscontent = "<img src='/web/resources/graphics/exclamation.png' alt='' /> "+errors.length+" System error"+(errors.length>1?"s":""); } $("#top-bar-systemstatus a").html(statuscontent); //Update timestamp $("#top-bar-timestamp").html($(xml).find("Timestamp").text()); //Update storename $("#top-bar-storename").html("Store: "+$(xml).find("StoreName").text()); } }); There are loads of other jQuery code on the page which all works fine and causes no errors so I cannot quite understand what is wrong with this. The page isn't "live" so cannot provide a link to it unfortunately. The error it lists is document type does not allow element "img" here And the line of code it points to is here: statuscontent = "<img src='/web/resources/graphics/accept.png' alt='' /> System OK"; It also has an issue with the next assignment to statuscontent

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >