Search Results

Search found 11364 results on 455 pages for 'port blocking'.

Page 43/455 | < Previous Page | 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50  | Next Page >

• how to change port number of Apache server in windows OS

  - by jesop

  I have installed xampp control panel and Apache 2.2 on windows XP when I type http://localhost/ gives me page which says It Works! Now, I want to change the port number 80 to some other number How to change it ? in how many files does it needs to be changed ? dose it require to restart the system to change to take effect ? Note: I have changed port number in C:\xampp\apache\conf\httpd.conf in two places where it says Listen 80 and ServerName localhost:80 Pls help, thanks.

  Read the article

• Configure static IP with port number which will point to multiple projects on different ports

  - by Yogesh Kadam

  I am developing a project in LAM* and using the Symfony framework. I have one static IP like 99.99.99.99:8000 which points on my Linux server machine. This static IP already has port number of 8000. This Linux server machine has multiple project hosted on it and we access each project in LAN with different port number like abc:81, pqr:82, xyz:83. Is is possible to access each project on same Linux machine by this static IP? If yes then please let me know how to configure and call each project using this IP address.

  Read the article

• cygwin ssh connection to server port 22 connection refused on localhost

  - by Steven Wexler

  I set up a ssh server through ssh-host-config. Then I started the server. net start sshd The CYGWIN sshd service is starting. The CYGWIN sshd service was started successfully. When I try to connect I get: ssh myusername@localhost ssh: connect to host localhost port 22: Connection refused I tried to allow port 22 in Windows Firewall, but that didn't change anything. And because I'm trying to ssh locally I don't think Windows Firewall is the culprit. I'm using Windows 7 and What should I look for to fix this problem?

  Read the article

• PHP SOAP client accessing server on non-standard port

  - by sims

  The service I'm trying to send requests to is accessible via a non-standard port - so not port 80. It is accessible locally via port 80. So I've tested the app locally and it works fine. But when I deploy it on the production server (not on the LAN), it fails. Once again for clarity: -dev server is on the LAN -SOAP server is on the LAN -production server is on the WAN -SOAP server is accessible through the NAT/FW via a non-standard http port (not 80) The soap client is created with the specified WSDL URI. For example: $this->client = new Zend_Soap_Client('http://server.com:10080/path/service.asmx?WSDL'); But queries to not work: $this->client->function($query); I get an: Internal Server Error Exception thrown. Is PHP broken in this regard? Is there a workaround?

  Read the article

• Port binding conflicts with "switch user" on Windows 7

  - by C-dizzle

  We are using the switch user function within Windows 7 under an active directory network. We have one application in particular that gives us an error: Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted. bind Port 10001 Are there any other ports that can only be used at one time that might have an adverse effect on the other user? We try to mentor our users to use the log off function instead of switch user, but that doesn't always happen. As an alternative, is it possible to disable the 'switch user' button on our machines?

  Read the article

• How to bind Apache to specific IP and port on Windows Server 2008

  - by webworm

  I have a Windows Server 2008 R2 that I use to host various ASP.NET applications under IIS7. I would also like to run various PHP based web apps using Apache (or Apache 2). The server has three static IP addresses assigned to it and I would like to bind one of the IP addresses to Apache while using the other two IP addresses for IIS. I can use the IIS Manager to bind the specific IP addresses to IIS, but I am unaware of how to do this with Apache. Can anyone tell me how to go about binding Apache to a specific IP address and port (port 80 is what I want to use). Please note .. I am aware that PHP can run under IIS. In fact that is how I have been running my PHP web applications. However, there are so many inconsistencies and pitfalls with PHP running under IIS that I just prefer to use Apache.

  Read the article

• Configuring a Jetty web application on a different port

  - by sHz

  Hi folks, I'm brand new to Jetty. I'd like to ask if its possible to have Jetty listening on port 8080, however where specified, serve a specific web application under say /var/jetty/webapps/<appname> (default on CentOS) served on say port 10000 instead of http://localhost:8080/<appname> i.e. http://localhost:10000/ = http://localhost:8080/<appname&gt; ? If so, what configuration changes would be required to make this work without an additional proxy server? I've googled away, but haven't found a solution (perhaps I've missed something obvious?).

  Read the article

• Linux script to kill process listening on a particular port

  - by Evgeny

  I have a process that listens on a TCP port (?0003). From time to time it crashes - badly. It stops working, but continues hogging the port for some time, so I can't even restart it. I'm looking to automate this. What I do right now is: netstat -ntlp |grep -P "\*\:\d0003" To see what the PID is and then: kill -9 <pid> Does anyone have a script (or EXE for that matter) that would link the two steps together, ie. parse the PID from the first command and pass it to the second?

  Read the article

• route port 3000 to apache2 alias

  - by user223470

  I have a meteor application running on port 3000. I can successfully connect to the program with www.myurl.com:3000, but would rather connect to it via www.myurl.com/myappname. I started with the instructions on this web site: http://www.andrehonsberg.com/article/deploy-meteorjs-vhosts-ubuntu1204-mongodb-apache-proxy and I have the following Apache configuration file: <VirtualHost *:80> ServerName myurl.com ProxyRequests off <Proxy *> Order deny,allow Allow from all </Proxy> <Location /> ProxyPass http://localhost:3000/ ProxyPassReverse http://localhost:3000/ </Location> </VirtualHost> I do not know how to continue from here to get the program on www.mysite.com/myapp. In other situations, I would use an Alias within the Apache configuration file, but that doesn't seem like the right direction to go in this case. How do I configure Apache to send port 3000 to www.myurl.com/myapp?

  Read the article

• Amazon blocked port 80 and 443 on my instance

  - by Burak

  Amazon AWS sent me an email about warning that my instance have been behaving like Phising that is against AWS Customer Agreement. And they noticed that they blocked port 80 and 443 which are for HTTP and HTTPS respectively. Google Safe Browsing also reported that some code injection was made to one of my websites. After a cleaning, Google stopped blocking my website displaying in the search result. So, how can I unblock my ports?

  Read the article

• Specifying --host1 as localhost with port 8983 in autobench

  - by mamatha

  I am using autobench for benchmarking in ubuntu 8.10 autobench --single_host --host1 localhost --uri1 /solr/admin --low_rate 20 --high_rate 200 --rate_step 20 --num_call 10 --num_conn 5000 --timeout 5 --file bench1.tsv This is the command which I gave. It is taking the default port as 80 and the number of replies and requests are as shown below **Errors: total 5000 client-timo 0 socket-timo 0 connrefused 5000 connreset 0 Errors: fd-unavail 0 addrunavail 0 ftab-full 0 other 0 Zero replies received, test invalid: rate 20 httperf --timeout=5 --client=0/1 --server=localhost --port=80 --uri=/solr/admin --rate=40 --send-buffer=4096 --recv-buffer=16384 --num-conns=5000 --num-calls=10 Maximum connect burst length: 4 Total: connections 5000 requests 0 replies 0 test-duration 124.976 s** But, I want the port to be 8983. In all the examples that I have seen in the autobench tutorial, --host1 is a website (such as, www.test.com). Can anyone suggest how to use localhost taking the port as 8983? Thanks, in advance.

  Read the article

• User Friendly port knocker (port knocking client) for Windows?

  - by Ekevoo

  It seems "It's me" is the most popular port knocking client for windows… Except… it sucks. It works for console-savvy users such as me, but, unsurprisingly, all my users hate console windows. I know better than to force it upon them. I would love to have a nice port knocker for Windows that would be windowed, have launchers, and be easily provisionable (i.e. I tell my user to paste some settings or import some file by double clicking it). To be honest, just not being console-based would be enough.

  Read the article

• Single-port 2600 router with 2900XL switch

  - by Slava Maslennikov

  I have a setup, where the single port 2600 router is in port 0/2 in the switch, outside network is on port 0/1, and the rest (0/3-0/24) should be clients for the second network that would be managed by the 2600 router. I configured everything with two VLANs: 100 for outside (0/2-0/24), 200 for inside (0/1-0/2). 0/2 is a trunk port for the two VLANs. The issue that came about is that I can't have two VLANs on at once: software doesn't allow it. Now, I can ping the outside network devices (172.16.7.1, 172.16.7.103), and even google (8.8.8.8) from the router, but not the switch. Devices on connected get a DHCP lease properly but can't ping outside the network, just the router - 172.17.7.1 and the switch itself, 172.17.7.7. The configuration for both the router and the switch are here, as well as below. Router: rt.throom#sho run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1015 bytes ! version 12.1 no service single-slot-reload-enable service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname rt.throom ! enable password To053cret ! ! ! ! ! no ip subnet-zero ip dhcp excluded-address 172.17.7.1 172.17.7.2 ip dhcp excluded-address 172.17.7.3 172.17.7.4 ip dhcp excluded-address 172.17.7.5 ! ip dhcp pool VLAN200 network 172.17.7.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 172.17.7.1 dns-server 8.8.8.8 ! ip audit notify log ip audit po max-events 100 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0/0 no ip address ! interface Ethernet0/0.100 encapsulation dot1Q 100 ip address 172.16.7.15 255.255.255.0 ip nat outside ! interface Ethernet0/0.200 encapsulation dot1Q 200 ip address 172.17.7.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ! router eigrp 20 network 172.16.0.0 network 172.17.0.0 no auto-summary no eigrp log-neighbor-changes ! no ip classless no ip http server ! access-list 1 permit 172.17.7.0 0.0.0.255 ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end Switch: sw.throom#sho run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 11.2 no service pad no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname sw.throom ! enable password Oh5053cret ! ! no spanning-tree vlan 100 no spanning-tree vlan 200 ip subnet-zero ! ! interface VLAN1 no ip address no ip route-cache ! interface FastEthernet0/1 switchport access vlan 100 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/2 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk ! interface FastEthernet0/3 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/4 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/5 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/6 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/7 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/8 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/9 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/10 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/11 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/12 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/13 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/14 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/15 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/16 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/17 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/18 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/19 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/20 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/21 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/22 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/23 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/24 switchport access vlan 200 spanning-tree portfast ! ! line con 0 stopbits 1 line vty 0 4 login line vty 5 9 login ! end sho ip route gives: Gateway of last resort is 172.16.7.1 to network 0.0.0.0 172.17.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 172.17.7.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0.200 172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 172.16.7.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0.100 S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 172.16.7.1

  Read the article

• xinet vs iptables for port forwarding performance

  - by jamie.mccrindle

  I have a requirement to run a Java based web server on port 80. The options are: Web proxy (apache, nginx etc.) xinet iptables setuid The baseline would be running the app using setuid but I'd prefer not to for security reasons. Apache is too slow and nginx doesn't support keep-alives so new connections are made for every proxied request. xinet is easy to set up but creates a new process for every request which I've seen cause problems in a high performance environment. The last option is port forwarding with iptables but I have no experience of how fast it is. Of course, the ideal solution would be to do this on a dedicated hardware firewall / load balancer but that's not an option at present.

  Read the article

• Is opening ports in the firewall bad?

  - by Steven

  From what little I know about networking, opening ports lets external data get sent in. But how that data is handled is entirely up to the applications running on my machine. So if I'm not running any malicious applications, there should be nothing wrong with disabling the firewall, right? Also, how do applications work when ports aren't forwarded? For example, I need to forward port TCP 6112 to host Blizzard games, but I've heard that HTTP uses port 80, but I haven't forwarded that port, yet Firefox still works. Btw I'm using Windows Vista.

  Read the article

• OS Concepts in Layman Terms

  - by syker

  What is the difference between the following concepts in layman terms: spinning lock, blocking and condition?

  Read the article

• Configure Windows firewall to prevent an application from listening on a specific port [closed]

  - by U-D13

  The issue: there are many applications struggling to listen on port 80 (Skype, Teamviewer et al.), and to many of them that even is not essential (in the sense that you can have a httpd running and blocking the http port, and the other application won't even squeak about being unable to open the port). What makes things worse, some of the apps are... Well, I suppose, that it's okay that the mentally impaired are being integrated in the society by giving them a job to do, but... Programming requires some intellectual effort, in my humble opinion... What I mean is that there is no way to configure the app not to use specific ports (that's what you get for using proprietary software) - you can either add it to windows firewall exceptions (and succumb to undesired port opening behavior) or not (and risk losing most - if not all - of the functionality). Technically, it is not impossible for the firewall to deny an application opening an incoming port even if the application is in the exception list. And if this functionality is built into the Windows firewall somewhere, there should be a way to activate it. So, what I want to know is: whether there exists such an option, and if it does how to activate it.

  Read the article

• how to change port number of Apache server in windows OS

  - by jesop

  I have installed xampp control panel and Apache 2.2 on windows XP when I type http://localhost/ gives me page which says It Works! Now, I want to change the port number 80 to some other number How to change it ? in how many files does it needs to be changed ? dose it require to restart the system to change to take effect ? Note: I have changed port number in C:\xampp\apache\conf\httpd.conf in two places where it says Listen 80 and ServerName localhost:80 Pls help, thanks.

  Read the article

• Silverlight WCF connection blocking

  - by Rafal

  Hi I have a problem calling WCF Service Method by Silverlight App. I keep getting Error in Fidler: [Fiddler] Connection to localhost failed. Exception Text: Can not connect because the target machine actively refused it: 1:50045 I use Win 7, port 50045 is unlocked. My App.config and ServiceReferences.ClientConfig are OK... Please HELP:)

  Read the article

• Supervisor HTTP Server Port Issue.

  - by Catalina

  I have supervisor setup to manage a few processes. It works perfectly fine when I boot my server, however when I stop it and try to start it again it fails and give's me this error msg: * Starting Supervisor daemon manager... Error: Another program is already listening on a port that one of our HTTP servers is configured to use. Shut this program down first before starting supervisord. For help, use /usr/bin/supervisord -h ...fail! I'm running nginx on port 80 and 4 web servers on ports 8000, 8001, 8002, 8003 Does anyone have any idea of what is going on? When I reboot everything works fine.

  Read the article

• Dual WAN port on a WRT54GL

  - by pufferfish

  Is it possible to reconfigure one of the LAN ports on a WRT54GL (running Tomato firmware) to act as a second WAN port? I have the following networks: PPOE connection to ADSL modem (works fine on the normal WAN port) WiFi neighbourhood network (in 178.X.X.X range), via a Mikrotik routerboard which I'd like to put on the WAN side of the router. I'd then like to set up routing so than some traffic (172.X.X.X) is routed to the Mikrotik and the rest to the ADSL modem. p.s. for practical reasons, I can't use the Mikrotik as the firewall/router. Edit: It seems this can be done by editing iptables, can someone tell me exactly how?

  Read the article

• Configure Iptables to allow a PHP-app accessing a port-nr

  - by Camran

  I have a php-application which connects to another app called Solr (database search engine). I can via this php app add/remove documents (records) from the Solr index. However, the Solr security is low, and anybody with the right port nr can access Solr and remove documents (records). I wonder, is it possible to ONLY allow my own php-app to have access to Solr somehow? Prefferably via Iptables. I am thinking I can only allow my own servers IP to that port, and it would solve my problem, because PHP is a server-side code. But I am not sure. About the Php-app: The website is a classifieds website, and when users wants to add or remove classifieds, they do so through a php app, which is this one. The app has a function which connects to solr and updates the database (index). I appreciate detailed answers... Thanks

  Read the article

• Howto configure openSuSE firewall to route local traffic to local ports

  - by Eduard Wirch

  I have openSUSE 11.3 installed. I'm using the openSUSE firewall configuration mechanism (/etc/sysconfig/SuSEfirewall2). I have a http server application running on port 8080. I want the http service to be accessible using port 80. I created a redirect rule usign: FW_REDIRECT="0/0,0/0,tcp,80,8080" This works fine for every request coming from external. But it doesn't for local requests. (example: wget http://myserver/) Is there a way how I can tell the firewall to redirect local requests addressed for 80 to port 8080? (using the SUSE firewall configuration file)

  Read the article

• Is Gmail Being Blocked by my ISP?

  - by james

  I asked this over at superuser but they weren't able to help, so I was hoping the sysadmins here will be able to advise as to what's wrong. Although the issue here is with a PC and not a server it still deals with networking so I hope it's not too irrelevant. The Issue: I have a desktop on which I cannot access Gmail and also youtube sign in (I believe since youtube is owned by google they both use the same sign in system). On other computers that uses the same connection via a wireless router I can access both gmail and youtube sign in just fine. On this computer which doesn't have a wireless card and so I have to connect via Ethernet cable (connected to a USB converter since the Ethernet port doesn't work anymore) I can access all sites and services including things like aol and hotmail. But only when it comes to gmail, do I get complete and utter throttling. I even turned off my AV ad Firewall momentarily and no luck. The gmail log in page starts to load and by mid point it just stays there loading and loading and loading... never ends. I tried everything, I reset the modem and router multiple times. I reinstalled my operating system from a vista to a windows 7 hoping that a complete reinstall would solve the issue, but no luck. And yes, I am going to call my ISP but not to solve this issue, but to cancel them. I want to upgrade to cable from DSL anyway. I didn't mention my ISP because I'm not sure if that is within the rules (if it's okay some one let me know and I will). P.S. All this happened one day, before that gmail was perfectly accessible in this computer. I can't remember anything special happening on that day prior to this. The only thing I can think of is, my ISP or Google itself is blocking this computer based on it's mac address, but I don't know if that's even done. Additional info: PC: Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit Connection Type: DSL Connecting Medium: Ethernet cable via USB converter EDIT: I should mention I can access gmail and youtube just fine through a IP proxy service.

  Read the article

• Setting Cookie Port

  - by MasterMax1313

  I'm trying to set the port on a cookie in ASP.NET (code below), but I'm getting a very unusual error at runtime (below the code). Any thoughts? target.Cookie = new Cookie { Comment = "Test Comment", CommentUri = new System.Uri("http://www.tempuri.org"), Discard = false, Domain = "tempuri.com", Expired = false, Expires = new DateTime(2015, 12, 31), HttpOnly = false, Name = "TestCookie", Path = "/", Port = "443", Secure = false, Value = "Test Value", Version = 1, }; Exception: System.Net.CookieException: The 'Port'='443' part of the cookie is invalid..

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50  | Next Page >