I have some code that looks like the following. First I have some domain classes and some special comparators for them.
public class Fruit {
public int Calories { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class FruitEqualityComparer : IEqualityComparer<Fruit> {
// ...
}
public class BasketEqualityComparer : IEqualityComparer<IEnumerable<Fruit>> {
// ...
}
Next, I have a helper class called ConstraintChecker. It has a simple BaseEquals method that makes sure some simple base cases are considered:
public static class ConstraintChecker {
public static bool BaseEquals(T lhs, T rhs) {
bool sameObject = l == r;
bool leftNull = l == null;
bool rightNull = r == null;
return sameObject && !leftNull && !rightNull;
}
There's also a SemanticEquals method which is just a BaseEquals check and a comparator function that you specify.
public static bool SemanticEquals<T>(T lhs, T rhs, Func<T, T, bool> f) {
return BaseEquals(lhs, rhs) && f(lhs, rhs);
}
And finally there's a SemanticSequenceEquals method which accepts two IEnumerable<T> instances to compare, and an IEqualityComparer instance that will get called on each pair of elements in the list via Enumerable.SequenceEquals.
public static bool SemanticSequenceEquals<T, U, V>(U lhs, U rhs, V comparator)
where U : IEnumerable<T>
where V : IEqualityComparer<T> {
return SemanticEquals(lhs, rhs, (l, r) => lhs.SequenceEqual(rhs, comparator));
}
} // end of ConstraintChecker
The point of SemanticSequenceEquals is that you don't have to define two comparators whenever you want to compare both IEnumerable<T> and T instances; now you can just specify an IEqualityComparer<T> and it will also handle lists when you invoke SemanticSequenceEquals. So I could get rid of the BasketEqualityComparer class, which would be nice.
But there's a problem. The C# compiler can't figure out the types involved when you invoke SemanticSequenceEquals:
return ConstraintChecker.SemanticSequenceEquals(lhs, rhs, new FruitEqualityComparer());
If I specify them explicitly, it works:
return ConstraintChecker.SemanticSequenceEquals<
Fruit, IEnumerable<Fruit>, IEqualityComparer<Fruit>
> (lhs, rhs, new FruitEqualityComparer());
What can I change here so that I don't have to write the type parameters explicitly?
