Search Results

Search found 19376 results on 776 pages for 'char array'.

Page 45/776 | < Previous Page | 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52  | Next Page >

  • how to pass an array into an function and in the function count how many numbers are in a range?

    - by user320950
    #include <iostream> #include <fstream> using namespace std; int calculate_total(int exam1[], int exam2[], int exam3[]); // function that calcualates grades to see how many 90,80,70,60 int exam1[100];// array that can hold 100 numbers for 1st column int exam2[100];// array that can hold 100 numbers for 2nd column int exam3[100];// array that can hold 100 numbers for 3rd column // here i am passing an array into the function calcualate_total int calculate_total(exam1[],exam2[],exam3[]) { int above90=0, above80=0, above70=0, above60=0; if((num<=90) && (num >=100)) { above90++; { if((num<=80) && (num >=89)) { above80++; { if((num<=70) && (num >=79)) { above70++; { if((num<=60) && (num >=69)) { above60++; } } } } } } } }

    Read the article

  • Numpy: Creating a complex array from 2 real ones?

    - by Duncan Tait
    I swear this should be so easy... Why is it not? :( In fact, I want to combine 2 parts of the same array to make a complex array: Data[:,:,:,0] , Data[:,:,:,1] These don't work: x = np.complex(Data[:,:,:,0], Data[:,:,:,1]) x = complex(Data[:,:,:,0], Data[:,:,:,1]) Am I missing something? Does numpy not like performing array functions on complex numbers? Here's the error: TypeError: only length-1 arrays can be converted to Python scalars Cheers

    Read the article

  • Convert string to char

    - by Orsol
    Hi. I get from another class string that must be converted to char. It usually contains only one char and that's not a problem. But control chars i receive like '\n' or '\t'. Is there standard methods to convert this to endline or tab char or i need to parse it myself?

    Read the article

  • Filtering a PHP array containing dates into a yearly summary

    - by privateace
    I'm looking at a way to create a summary of transactions within a certain month based on the contents of a PHP array. Intended outcome (excusing layout): ------------------------------------------- | December 2009 | 12 | | January 2010 | 02 | | February 2010 | 47 | | March 2010 | 108 | | April 2010 | 499 | ------------------------------------------- Based on my array: Array ( [0] => Array ( [name] => 2009-10-23 [values] => Array ( [0] => INzY2MTI4ZWM4OGRm ) ) [1] => Array ( [name] => 2009-10-26 [values] => Array ( [0] => IYmIzOWNmMmU3OWQz ) ) [2] => Array ( [name] => 2009-11-23 [values] => Array ( [0] => INTg4YzgxYWU1ODkx [1] => IMjhkNDZkY2FjNDhl ) ) [3] => Array ( [name] => 2009-11-24 [values] => Array ( [0] => INTg4YzgxYWU1ODkx [1] => INTg4YzgxYWU1ODkx ) ) [4] => Array ( [name] => 2009-12-01 [values] => Array ( [0] => IMWFiODk5ZjU1OTFk ) ) I've had absolutely no luck no matter what I've tried. Especially with adding months that do not contain any variables.

    Read the article

  • Changing memory address of a char*

    - by Randall Flagg
    I have the following code: str = "ABCD"; //0x001135F8 newStr = "EFGH"; //0x008F5740 *str after realloc at 5th position - //0x001135FC I want it to point to: 0x008F5740 void str_cat(char** str, char* newStr) { int i; realloc(*str, strlen(*str) + strlen(newStr) + 1); //*str is now 9 length long // I want to change the memory reference value of the 5th char in *str to point to newStr. // Is this possible? // &((*str) + strlen(*str)) = (char*)&newStr; //This is my problem (I think) }

    Read the article

  • C++ vector of char array

    - by Stuart
    I am trying to write a program that has a vector of char arrays and am have some problems. char test [] = { 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e' }; vector<char[]> v; v.push_back(test); Sorry this has to be a char array because I need to be able to generate lists of chars as I am trying to get an output something like. a a a b a c a d a e b a b c Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Accessing appropriate array of double arrays in order of last created.

    - by Zach
    I have an array of double arrays, they are within a specified time window (8am-5pm), and are in order of last created over a period of several days. They are all timestamped and as such I have access to all C# DateTime methods. I then have a different iterative function that goes in the same order of the array of double arrays, however it isn't within a specified time window, it's 24/7. I want to access from this iterative function, the appropriate double array from the one within the window. Let's say that it's 4:30PM on DayOfYear 52, I'd like to access the last double array less than or equal to 4:30PM on DayOfYear 52. I'd expect the same double array if the time were 12:30AM on DayOfYear 53. However, if it were 9:00 AM of DayOfYear 53, well then I'd expect it to return something from the DayOfYear 53, less than or equal to 9:00AM. I think you get the idea. So I'm a having a bit of trouble grokking how to do this. Is anyone willing to offer a starting point or how they'd approach it? Edit: It is not a literal double[][], it is exactly as Anthony Pegram says: Dictionary<DateTime, double[]>

    Read the article

  • Is it good practice to initialize array in C/C++?

    - by sand
    I recently encountered a case where I need to compare two files (golden and expected) for verification of test results and even though the data written to both the files were same, the files does not match. On further investigation, I found that there is a structure which contains some integers and a char array of 64 bytes, and not all the bytes of char array were getting used in most of the cases and unused fields from the array contain random data and that was causing the mismatch. This brought me ask the question whether it is good practice to initialize the array in C/C++ as well, as it is done in Java?

    Read the article

  • Assign bitset member to char

    - by RedX
    I have some code here that uses bitsets to store many 1 bit values into a char. Basically struct BITS_8 { char _1:1; (...) char _8:1; } Now i was trying to pass one of these bits as a parameter into a function void func(char bit){ if(bit){ // do something }else{ // do something else } // and the call was struct BITS_8 bits; // all bits were set to 0 before bits._7 = 1; bits._8 = 1; func(bits._8); The solution was to single the bit out when calling the function: func(bits._8 & 0x128); But i kept going into //do something because other bits were set. I was wondering if this is the correct behaviour or if my compiler is broken. The compiler is an embedded compiler that produces code for freescale ASICs.

    Read the article

  • How to make sure a method returns an array, even when there is only one element in Ruby

    - by doctororange
    I have a Ruby method that searches an array of hashes and returns a subset of that array. def last_actions(type = 'all') actions = @actions if type == 'run' actions = actions.select {|a| a['type'] == "run" } end return actions end This works, except when there is only one action to return, in which case I don't think it is returning an array with one element, but just the element itself. This becomes problematic later. What's a good way to ensure it returns an array of 1 element in this case? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • C++ Template const char array to int

    - by Levi Schuck
    So, I'm wishing to be able to have a static const compile time struct that holds some value based on a string by using templates. I only desire up to four characters. I know that the type of 'abcd' is int, and so is 'ab','abc', and although 'a' is of type char, it works out for a template<int v> struct What I wish to do is take sizes of 2,3,4,5 of some const char, "abcd" and have the same functionality as if they used 'abcd'. Note that I do not mean 1,2,3, or 4 because I expect the null terminator. cout << typeid("abcd").name() << endl; tells me that the type for this hard coded string is char const [5], which includes the null terminator on the end. I understand that I will need to twiddle the values as characters, so they are represented as an integer. I cannot use constexpr since VS10 does not support it (VS11 doesn't either..) So, for example with somewhere this template defined, and later the last line template <int v> struct something { static const int value = v; }; //Eventually in some method cout << typeid(something<'abcd'>::value).name() << endl; works just fine. I've tried template<char v[5]> struct something2 { static const int value = v[0]; } template<char const v[5]> struct something2 { static const int value = v[0]; } template<const char v[5]> struct something2 { static const int value = v[0]; } All of them build individually, though when I throw in my test, cout << typeid(something2<"abcd">::value).name() << endl; I get 'something2' : invalid expression as a template argument for 'v' 'something2' : use of class template requires template argument list Is this not feasible or am I misunderstanding something?

    Read the article

  • Sorting mysql array value after string chars swapped from fetched DB data.

    - by Shail Patel
    I want to sort one column fetched from mysql DB, and stored in an array. After fetching I am doing below steps. 1- DB Fetching fields array in row format. ->Field1, Field2, Field3, Field4, Field5 2- From that fields array One columns data [Field3], swapping string keywords. eg. AB013, DB131, RS001 to->013AB, 131DB, 001RS Now I want to sort above value in new string format like-> 001RS, 013AB, 131DB

    Read the article

  • char array split ip with strtok

    - by user1480139
    I'm trying to split a IP address like 127.0.0.1 from a file: using following C code: pch2 = strtok (ip,"."); printf("\npart 1 ip: %s",pch2); pch2 = strtok (NULL,"."); printf("\npart 2 ip: %s",pch2); And IP is a char ip[500], that containt an ip. When printing it prints 127 as part 1 but as part 2 it prints NULL? Can someone help me? EDIT: Whole function: FILE *file = fopen ("host.txt", "r"); char * pch; char * pch2; char ip[BUFFSIZE]; IPPart result; if (file != NULL) { char line [BUFFSIZE]; while(fgets(line,sizeof line,file) != NULL) { if(line[0] != '#') { //fputs(line,stdout); pch = strtok (line," "); printf ("%s\n",pch); strncpy(ip, pch, sizeof(pch)-1); ip[sizeof(pch)-1] = '\0'; //pch = strtok (line, " "); pch = strtok (NULL," "); printf("%s",pch); pch2 = strtok (ip,"."); printf("\nDeel 1 ip: %s",pch2); pch2 = strtok (NULL,"."); printf("\nDeel 2 ip: %s",pch2); //if(strcmp(pch,url) == 0) //{ // result.part1 = //} } } fclose(file); }

    Read the article

  • PHP: Collect all variables passed to a function as array?

    - by Industrial
    Hi everybody, I was thinking about the possibility of accessing all the variables that are passed into an function, and merge them into an array. (Without passing variables into an array from the beginning) Pseudo-code: // Call function newFunction('one', 'two', 'three' ) ;// All values are interpreted as a one rray in some way // Function layout newFunction( ) { // $functionvariables = array( All passed variables) foreach ($functionvariable as $k => $v) { // Do stuff } }

    Read the article

  • how to access char*** from dll import in C#

    - by mavrick
    I have a function in win32 dll with signature as: void func1(int a, char*** outData) int a -- input parameter char*** outData -- output parameter - pointer to array of char strings Any idea how to access this in C# using dll import & what should be the signature.

    Read the article

  • when to use const char *

    - by djones2010
    If i have a function api that expects a 14 digit input and returns a 6 digit output. I basically define the input as a const char *. would that be the correct and safe thing to do? also why would I not want to just do char * which I could but it seems more prudent to use const char * in that case especially since its an api that i am providing. so for different input values I generate 6 digit codes.

    Read the article

  • c++: at what point should I start using "new char[N]" vs a static buffer "char[Nmax]"

    - by dan
    My question is with regard to C++ Suppose I write a function to return a list of items to the caller. Each item has 2 logical fields: 1) an int ID, and 2) some data whose size may vary, let's say from 4 bytes up to 16Kbytes. So my question is whether to use a data structure like: struct item { int field1; char field2[MAX_LEN]; OR, rather, to allocate field2 from the heap, and require the caller to destroy when he's done: struct item{ int field1; char *field2; // new char[N] -- destroy[] when done! Since the max size of field #2 is large, is makes sense that this would be allocated from the heap, right? So once I know the size N, I call field2 = new char[N], and populate it. Now, is this horribly inefficient? Is it worse in cases where N is always small, i.e. suppose I have 10000 items that have N=4?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52  | Next Page >