Search Results

Search found 254060 results on 10163 pages for 'stack oriented'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 49/10163 | < Previous Page | 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56  | Next Page >

  • how does memory stacks work in javascript

    - by user227353
    When we have code like: function a(){ var x =0; this.add=function(){ alert(x++); } } var test = new a(); test.add(); // alert 0 test.add(); // alert 1 test.add(); // alert 2 How does this work? Doesn't that the value of 'x' in a() should be 'gone' as soon as test = new a() is complete? The stack contains x should also be gone as well, right? Or, does javascript always keep all the stacks ever created in case they will be referenced in future? But that wouldn't be nice, would it...?

    Read the article

  • Stacking Dialogs in Android

    - by ChaimKut
    Is there a way to control the relative stacking of Dialogs produced by your own Activity? For instance, there are some more important Dialogs which I would like to ensure are on top and if another Dialog wants to pop up I would want it to pop under the important Dialogs. Example: I want to present to the user an important dialog, Dialog A. The activity realizes that there is a dialog, Dialog B, of lesser importance to display to the user. Is it possible to specify Dialog B to be under Dialog A so that when Dialog A is cleared, Dialog B will be seen by the user? I know that the onDismiss interface exists, but this necessarily ties Dialog A and Dialog B together. I want the Dialogs to be independent and would prefer to use a higher level abstraction like the window stack responsible for ordering the Dialogs.

    Read the article

  • Are destructors of automatic objects invoked when terminate is called?

    - by nbolton
    I'm pondering a question on Brainbench. I actually realised that I could answer my question easily by compiling the code, but it's an interesting question nonetheless, so I'll ask the question anyway and answer it myself shortly. Take a look at this snippet: The question considers what happens when we throw from a destructor (which causes terminate() to be called). It's become clear to me by asking the question that the memory is indeed freed and the destructor is called, but, is this before or after throw is called from foo? Perhaps the issue here is that throw is used while the stack is unwinding that is the problem... Actually this is slightly confusing.

    Read the article

  • why does it use the movl instead of push ?!

    - by user554403
    hi all. pay attention to this code : #include <stdio.h> void a(int a, int b, int c) { char buffer1[5]; char buffer2[10]; } int main() { a(1,2,3); } after that : gcc -S a.c that command shows our source code in assembly. now we can see in the main function, we never use "push" command to push the arguments of the a function into the stack. and it used "movel" instead of that main: pushl %ebp movl %esp, %ebp andl $-16, %esp subl $16, %esp movl $3, 8(%esp) movl $2, 4(%esp) movl $1, (%esp) call a leave why does it happen? what's difference between them?

    Read the article

  • Trying to convert simple midlet application to Android application but running into problems.

    - by chobo2
    Hi I am trying to do some threading in Android so I took an old threading assignment I had done fora midlet and took out the midlet code and replaced it with android code(such as textview). package com.assignment1; import android.app.Activity; import android.os.Bundle; import android.widget.TextView; public class Threading extends Activity { private TextView tortose; private TextView hare; private Thread hareThread; private Thread torotoseThread; private int num = 0; private int num2 = 0; public Threading() { } /** Called when the activity is first created. */ @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); tortose = (TextView) findViewById(R.id.TextView01); hare = (TextView) findViewById(R.id.TextView02); Hare newHare = new Hare(); hareThread = new Thread(newHare); hareThread.start(); Torotose newTortose = new Torotose(); torotoseThread = new Thread(newTortose); torotoseThread.start(); //updateDisplay(); } private synchronized void check(int value1, int value2) { if((value1-value2) >= 10) { try { wait(); } catch(Exception ex) { System.out.println(ex); } } } private synchronized void getGoing(int value1, int value2) { if((value1-value2) == 0) { try { notify(); } catch(Exception ex) { System.out.println(ex); } } } private class Hare extends Thread { public void run() { while(true) { num++; hare.setText(Integer.toString(num)); check(num, num2); try { // are threads different in andriod apps? Thread.sleep(100); // hareThread.sleep(100); } catch(Exception ex) { System.out.println(ex); } } } } private class Torotose extends Thread { public void run() { while(true) { num2++; tortose.setText(Integer.toString(num2)); getGoing(num,num2); try { Thread.sleep(200); //torotoseThread.sleep(200); } catch(Exception ex) { System.out.println(ex); } } } } } First it wanted me to change my threads to like static threads.So is this just how Android does it? Next when I run this code it just crashes with some unexpected error. I am not sure what the error is but when I try to debug it and goes to like to create a new "hare" object it shows me this. // Compiled from ClassLoader.java (version 1.5 : 49.0, super bit) public abstract class java.lang.ClassLoader { // Method descriptor #8 ()V // Stack: 3, Locals: 1 protected ClassLoader(); 0 aload_0 [this] 1 invokespecial java.lang.Object() [1] 4 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 7 dup 8 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 10 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 13 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 4] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 14] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader // Method descriptor #14 (Ljava/lang/ClassLoader;)V // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 protected ClassLoader(java.lang.ClassLoader parentLoader); 0 aload_0 [this] 1 invokespecial java.lang.Object() [1] 4 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 7 dup 8 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 10 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 13 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 5] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 14] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 14] local: parentLoader index: 1 type: java.lang.ClassLoader // Method descriptor #17 ()Ljava/lang/ClassLoader; // Stack: 3, Locals: 0 public static java.lang.ClassLoader getSystemClassLoader(); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 6] // Method descriptor #19 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/net/URL; // Stack: 3, Locals: 1 public static java.net.URL getSystemResource(java.lang.String resName); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 7] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: resName index: 0 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #23 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/util/Enumeration; // Signature: (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/util/Enumeration<Ljava/net/URL;>; // Stack: 3, Locals: 1 public static java.util.Enumeration getSystemResources(java.lang.String resName) throws java.io.IOException; 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 8] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: resName index: 0 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #29 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/io/InputStream; // Stack: 3, Locals: 1 public static java.io.InputStream getSystemResourceAsStream(java.lang.String resName); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 9] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: resName index: 0 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #31 ([BII)Ljava/lang/Class; // Signature: ([BII)Ljava/lang/Class<*>; // Stack: 3, Locals: 4 protected final java.lang.Class defineClass(byte[] classRep, int offset, int length) throws java.lang.ClassFormatError; 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 10] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: classRep index: 1 type: byte[] [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: offset index: 2 type: int [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: length index: 3 type: int // Method descriptor #39 (Ljava/lang/String;[BII)Ljava/lang/Class; // Signature: (Ljava/lang/String;[BII)Ljava/lang/Class<*>; // Stack: 3, Locals: 5 protected final java.lang.Class defineClass(java.lang.String className, byte[] classRep, int offset, int length) throws java.lang.ClassFormatError; 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 11] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: className index: 1 type: java.lang.String [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: classRep index: 2 type: byte[] [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: offset index: 3 type: int [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: length index: 4 type: int // Method descriptor #42 (Ljava/lang/String;[BIILjava/security/ProtectionDomain;)Ljava/lang/Class; // Signature: (Ljava/lang/String;[BIILjava/security/ProtectionDomain;)Ljava/lang/Class<*>; // Stack: 3, Locals: 6 protected final java.lang.Class defineClass(java.lang.String className, byte[] classRep, int offset, int length, java.security.ProtectionDomain protectionDomain) throws java.lang.ClassFormatError; 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 12] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: className index: 1 type: java.lang.String [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: classRep index: 2 type: byte[] [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: offset index: 3 type: int [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: length index: 4 type: int [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: protectionDomain index: 5 type: java.security.ProtectionDomain // Method descriptor #46 (Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer;Ljava/security/ProtectionDomain;)Ljava/lang/Class; // Signature: (Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer;Ljava/security/ProtectionDomain;)Ljava/lang/Class<*>; // Stack: 3, Locals: 4 protected final java.lang.Class defineClass(java.lang.String name, java.nio.ByteBuffer b, java.security.ProtectionDomain protectionDomain) throws java.lang.ClassFormatError; 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 13] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: name index: 1 type: java.lang.String [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: b index: 2 type: java.nio.ByteBuffer [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: protectionDomain index: 3 type: java.security.ProtectionDomain // Method descriptor #52 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/Class; // Signature: (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/Class<*>; // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 protected java.lang.Class findClass(java.lang.String className) throws java.lang.ClassNotFoundException; 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 14] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: className index: 1 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #52 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/Class; // Signature: (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/Class<*>; // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 protected final java.lang.Class findLoadedClass(java.lang.String className); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 15] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: className index: 1 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #52 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/Class; // Signature: (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/Class<*>; // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 protected final java.lang.Class findSystemClass(java.lang.String className) throws java.lang.ClassNotFoundException; 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 16] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: className index: 1 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #17 ()Ljava/lang/ClassLoader; // Stack: 3, Locals: 1 public final java.lang.ClassLoader getParent(); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 17] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader // Method descriptor #19 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/net/URL; // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 public java.net.URL getResource(java.lang.String resName); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 18] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: resName index: 1 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #23 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/util/Enumeration; // Signature: (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/util/Enumeration<Ljava/net/URL;>; // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 public java.util.Enumeration getResources(java.lang.String resName) throws java.io.IOException; 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 19] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: resName index: 1 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #29 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/io/InputStream; // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 public java.io.InputStream getResourceAsStream(java.lang.String resName); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 20] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: resName index: 1 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #52 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/Class; // Signature: (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/Class<*>; // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 public java.lang.Class loadClass(java.lang.String className) throws java.lang.ClassNotFoundException; 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 21] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: className index: 1 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #62 (Ljava/lang/String;Z)Ljava/lang/Class; // Signature: (Ljava/lang/String;Z)Ljava/lang/Class<*>; // Stack: 3, Locals: 3 protected java.lang.Class loadClass(java.lang.String className, boolean resolve) throws java.lang.ClassNotFoundException; 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 22] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: className index: 1 type: java.lang.String [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: resolve index: 2 type: boolean // Method descriptor #67 (Ljava/lang/Class;)V // Signature: (Ljava/lang/Class<*>;)V // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 protected final void resolveClass(java.lang.Class clazz); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 23] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: clazz index: 1 type: java.lang.Class Local variable type table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: clazz index: 1 type: java.lang.Class<?> // Method descriptor #19 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/net/URL; // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 protected java.net.URL findResource(java.lang.String resName); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 24] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: resName index: 1 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #23 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/util/Enumeration; // Signature: (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/util/Enumeration<Ljava/net/URL;>; // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 protected java.util.Enumeration findResources(java.lang.String resName) throws java.io.IOException; 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 25] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: resName index: 1 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #76 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String; // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 protected java.lang.String findLibrary(java.lang.String libName); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 26] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: libName index: 1 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #79 (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/Package; // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 protected java.lang.Package getPackage(java.lang.String name); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 27] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: name index: 1 type: java.lang.String // Method descriptor #81 ()[Ljava/lang/Package; // Stack: 3, Locals: 1 protected java.lang.Package[] getPackages(); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 28] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader // Method descriptor #83 (Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/net/URL;)Ljava/lang/Package; // Stack: 3, Locals: 9 protected java.lang.Package definePackage(java.lang.String name, java.lang.String specTitle, java.lang.String specVersion, java.lang.String specVendor, java.lang.String implTitle, java.lang.String implVersion, java.lang.String implVendor, java.net.URL sealBase) throws java.lang.IllegalArgumentException; 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 29] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: name index: 1 type: java.lang.String [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: specTitle index: 2 type: java.lang.String [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: specVersion index: 3 type: java.lang.String [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: specVendor index: 4 type: java.lang.String [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: implTitle index: 5 type: java.lang.String [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: implVersion index: 6 type: java.lang.String [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: implVendor index: 7 type: java.lang.String [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: sealBase index: 8 type: java.net.URL // Method descriptor #94 (Ljava/lang/Class;[Ljava/lang/Object;)V // Signature: (Ljava/lang/Class<*>;[Ljava/lang/Object;)V // Stack: 3, Locals: 3 protected final void setSigners(java.lang.Class c, java.lang.Object[] signers); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 30] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: c index: 1 type: java.lang.Class [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: signers index: 2 type: java.lang.Object[] Local variable type table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: c index: 1 type: java.lang.Class<?> // Method descriptor #100 (Ljava/lang/String;Z)V // Stack: 3, Locals: 3 public void setClassAssertionStatus(java.lang.String cname, boolean enable); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 31] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: cname index: 1 type: java.lang.String [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: enable index: 2 type: boolean // Method descriptor #100 (Ljava/lang/String;Z)V // Stack: 3, Locals: 3 public void setPackageAssertionStatus(java.lang.String pname, boolean enable); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 32] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: pname index: 1 type: java.lang.String [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: enable index: 2 type: boolean // Method descriptor #106 (Z)V // Stack: 3, Locals: 2 public void setDefaultAssertionStatus(boolean enable); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 33] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: enable index: 1 type: boolean // Method descriptor #8 ()V // Stack: 3, Locals: 1 public void clearAssertionStatus(); 0 new java.lang.RuntimeException [2] 3 dup 4 ldc <String "Stub!"> [3] 6 invokespecial java.lang.RuntimeException(java.lang.String) [4] 9 athrow Line numbers: [pc: 0, line: 34] Local variable table: [pc: 0, pc: 10] local: this index: 0 type: java.lang.ClassLoader } So I am not sure where I went wrong. Thanks

    Read the article

  • OO design - car rental

    - by gkid123
    AnHow would you implement the following car hierarchy along with the accessor functions and a CarRental class which contains the container to store them? A car rental company wants to keep track of its cars. Each vehicle has a license plate and a brand. Currently the company has SUV and Sedans. SUV have an optional third row seat, sedan’s have an optional sport package. Each car can be queried to inquire the number of passengers it can carry.

    Read the article

  • Language Agnostic Basic Programming Question

    - by Rachel
    This is very basic question from programming point of view but as I am in learning phase, I thought I would better ask this question rather than having a misunderstanding or narrow knowledge about the topic. So do excuse me if somehow I mess it up. Question: Let's say I have class A,B,C and D now class A has some piece of code which I need to have in class B,C and D so I am extending class A in class B, class C, and class D Now how can I access the function of class A in other classes, do I need to create an object of class A and than access the function of class A or as am extending A in other classes than I can internally call the function using this parameter. If possible I would really appreciate if someone can explain this concept with code sample explaining how the logic flows. Note Example in Java, PHP and .Net would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Help with a compiler warning: Initialization from distinct Objective-C type when types match

    - by Alex Gosselin
    Here is the function where I get the compiler warning, I can't seem to figure out what is causing it. Any help is appreciated. -(void)displaySelector{ //warning on the following line: InstanceSelectorViewController *controller = [[InstanceSelectorViewController alloc] initWithCreator:self]; [self.navController pushViewController:controller animated:YES]; [controller release]; } Interface and implementation for the initWithCreator: method -(InstanceSelectorViewController*)initWithCreator:(InstanceCreator*)creator; -(InstanceSelectorViewController*)initWithCreator:(InstanceCreator*)crt{ if (self = [self initWithNibName:@"InstanceSelectorViewController" bundle:nil]) { creator = crt; } return self; }

    Read the article

  • C# Design How to Elegantly wrap a DAL class

    - by guazz
    I have an application which uses MyGeneration's dOODads ORM to generate it's Data Access Layer. dOODad works by generating a persistance class for each table in the database. It works like so: // Load and Save Employees emps = new Employees(); if(emps.LoadByPrimaryKey(42)) { emps.LastName = "Just Got Married"; emps.Save(); } // Add a new record Employees emps = new Employees(); emps.AddNew(); emps.FirstName = "Mr."; emps.LastName = "dOOdad"; emps.Save(); // After save the identity column is already here for me. int i = emps.EmployeeID; // Dynamic Query - All Employees with 'A' in thier last name Employees emps = new Employees(); emps.Where.LastName.Value = "%A%"; emps.Where.LastName.Operator = WhereParameter.Operand.Like; emps.Query.Load(); For the above example(i.e. Employees DAL object) I would like to know what is the best method/technique to abstract some of the implementation details on my classes. I don't believe that an Employee class should have Employees(the DAL) specifics in its methods - or perhaps this is acceptable? Is it possible to implement some form of repository pattern? Bear in mind that this is a high volume, perfomacne critical application. Thanks, j

    Read the article

  • UML Class Diagram for User Login

    - by 01010011
    Hi, The diagram below is my very first attempt at creating a UML class diagram describing a user login into a website. I'm sure its a poor design and full of flaws, but I'm hoping to learn from you guys how you would design a simple login like this. I'm particularly interested in your use of design patterns and which patterns you would use, how you would implement it in the design, and why. Any advise, criticisms, comments and suggestions will be really appreciated. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • What topic in computer science is this?

    - by jasonbogd
    Hi, I am trying to figure out what 'topic' this is called, so I can learn more about it. Basically, I'm talking about designing my applications's architecture. I'm not talking about algorithms. More like -- this class should have these methods and these instance variables, and communicate with this class in this way, this class should have these responsibilities etc. Can anybody tell me what the name of this topic is called and how I can get better at doing this? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Objective C for beginners

    - by Golfgod130
    I was just asked to talk about Objective C to a bunch of High School student for 20 minutes. They have no experience with programming at all. What topics should I cover? Should I define vocab such as Method, Class, Variable? Or should I do something else? Any comments are helpful!

    Read the article

  • Dealloc on my custom objective-C

    - by VansFannel
    Hello. I'm developing an iPhone application, and I very new on iPhone development. I've created some custom classes with instance variables (NSArray, NSString, etc.). All classes inherits from NSObject. Should I create a dealloc method to release all instance variables? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Fluent interface design and code smell

    - by Jiho Han
    public class StepClause { public NamedStepClause Action1() {} public NamedStepClause Action2() {} } public class NamedStepClause : StepClause { public StepClause Step(string name) {} } Basically, I want to be able to do something like this: var workflow = new Workflow().Configure() .Action1() .Step("abc").Action2() .Action2() .Step("def").Action1(); So, some "steps" are named and some are not. The thing I do not like is that the StepClause has knowledge of its derived class NamedStepClause. I tried a couple of things to make this sit better with me. I tried to move things out to interfaces but then the problem just moved from the concrete to the interfaces - INamedStepClause still need to derive from IStepClause and IStepClause needs to return INamedStepClause to be able to call Step(). I could also make Step() part of a completely separate type. Then we do not have this problem and we'd have: var workflow = new Workflow().Configure() .Step().Action1() .Step("abc").Action2() .Step().Action2() .Step("def").Action1(); Which is ok but I'd like to make the step-naming optional if possible. I found this other post on SO here which looks interesting and promising. What are your opinions? I'd think the original solution is completely unacceptable or is it? By the way, those action methods will take predicates and functors and I don't think I want to take an additional parameter for naming the step there. The point of it all is, for me, is to only define these action methods in one place and one place only. So the solutions from the referenced link using generics and extension methods seem to be the best approaches so far.

    Read the article

  • Derived class linker - is this wrong?

    - by bobobobo
    We have this situation: A B ^ ^ | / C so class A { } class B { } class C : public A, public B { } Now, B wants to access a property in C. How do you do this? The solution I came up with is to place a pointer in B to an instance of C, which is only active (not null) if this B is in fact a C.

    Read the article

  • Private constructor and public parameter constructor -C#

    - by Amutha
    I heard that private constructor prevent object creation from outside world. When i have a code public class Product { public string Name { get;set;} public double Price {get;set;} Product() { } public Product(string _name,double _price) { } } here still i can declare public constructor(parameter),won't it spoil the purpose of private constructor? When do we need both private and public constructor(parameter) in code? I need detailed explanation please.

    Read the article

  • C# Lack of Static Inheritance - What Should I Do?

    - by yellowblood
    Alright, so as you probably know, static inheritance is impossible in C#. I understand that, however I'm stuck with the development of my program. I will try to make it as simple as possible. Lets say our code needs to manage objects that are presenting aircrafts in some airport. The requirements are as follows: There are members and methods that are shared for all aircrafts There are many types of aircrafts, each type may have its own extra methods and members. There can be many instances for each aircraft type. Every aircraft type must have a friendly name for this type, and more details about this type. For example a class named F16 will have a static member FriendlyName with the value of "Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon". Other programmers should be able to add more aircrafts, although they must be enforced to create the same static details about the types of the aircrafts. In some GUI, there should be a way to let the user see the list of available types (with the details such as FriendlyName) and add or remove instances of the aircrafts, saved, lets say, to some XML file. So, basically, if I could enforce inherited classes to implement static members and methods, I would enforce the aircraft types to have static members such as FriendlyName. Sadly I cannot do that. So, what would be the best design for this scenario?

    Read the article

  • Making the domain-model of tic tac toe

    - by devoured elysium
    I am trying to make the domain model of a Tic Tac Toe game. I'll try then to go on through the various steps of the Unified Process and later implement it in some language (C# or Java). I'd like to have some feedback if I'm going on the right path: I've defined the game with two actors, Player O and Player X. I'm not sure about defining both a Tile and a Tile State. Maybe I should only define a Tile and have the 3 possible states specialize from it? I'm not sure what is best: to have both Player O and Player X be associations with Tic Tac Toe or have them inherit from Player that is associated with Tic Tac Toe. Following the design shown on the pic, in theory we could have a Tic Tac Toe concept with 2 Player O's, which wouldn't be correct. What is your opinion on this? Also, am I missing something in the diagram? Although I can't see any other actors for Tic Tac Toe, should I have any other? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Parametrized Strategy Pattern

    - by ott
    I have several Java classes which implement the strategy pattern. Each class has variable number parameters of different types: interface Strategy { public data execute(data); } class StrategyA implements Strategy { public data execute(data); } class StrategyB implements Strategy { public StrategyB(int paramA, int paramB); public data execute(data); } class StrategyB implements Strategy { public StrategyB(int paramA, String paramB, double paramC); public data execute(data); } Now I want that the user can enter the parameters in some kind of UI. The UI should be chosen at runtime, i.e. the strategies should be independent of it. The parameter dialog should not be monolithic and there should be the possibility to make it behave and look different for each strategy and UI (e.g. console or Swing). How would you solve this problem?

    Read the article

  • Strategy pattern and "action" classes explosion

    - by devoured elysium
    Is it bad policy to have lots of "work" classes(such as Strategy classes), that only do one thing? Let's assume I want to make a Monster class. Instead of just defining everything I want about the monster in one class, I will try to identify what are its main features, so I can define them in interfaces. That will allow to: Seal the class if I want. Later, other users can just create a new class and still have polymorphism by means of the interfaces I've defined. I don't have to worry how people (or myself) might want to change/add features to the base class in the future. All classes inherit from Object and they implement inheritance through interfaces, not from mother classes. Reuse the strategies I'm using with this monster for other members of my game world. Con: This model is rigid. Sometimes we would like to define something that is not easily achieved by just trying to put together this "building blocks". public class AlienMonster : IWalk, IRun, ISwim, IGrowl { IWalkStrategy _walkStrategy; IRunStrategy _runStrategy; ISwimStrategy _swimStrategy; IGrowlStrategy _growlStrategy; public Monster() { _walkStrategy = new FourFootWalkStrategy(); ...etc } public void Walk() { _walkStrategy.Walk(); } ...etc } My idea would be next to make a series of different Strategies that could be used by different monsters. On the other side, some of them could also be used for totally different purposes (i.e., I could have a tank that also "swims"). The only problem I see with this approach is that it could lead to a explosion of pure "method" classes, i.e., Strategy classes that have as only purpose make this or that other action. In the other hand, this kind of "modularity" would allow for high reuse of stratagies, sometimes even in totally different contexts. What is your opinion on this matter? Is this a valid reasoning? Is this over-engineering? Also, assuming we'd make the proper adjustments to the example I gave above, would it be better to define IWalk as: interface IWalk { void Walk(); } or interface IWalk { IWalkStrategy WalkStrategy { get; set; } //or something that ressembles this } being that doing this I wouldn't need to define the methods on Monster itself, I'd just have public getters for IWalkStrategy (this seems to go against the idea that you should encapsulate everything as much as you can!) Why? Thanks

    Read the article

  • AntFarm anti-pattern -- strategies to avoid, antidotes to help heal from

    - by alchemical
    I'm working on a 10 page web site with a database back-end. There are 500+ objects in use, trying to implement the MVP pattern in ASP.Net. I'm tracing the code-execution from a single-page, my finger has been on F-11 in Visual Studio for about 40 minutes, there seems to be no end, possibly 1000+ method calls for one web page! If it was just 50 objects that would be one thing, however, code execution snakes through all these objects just like millions of ants frantically woring in their giant dirt mound house, riddled with object tunnels. Hence, a new anti-pattern is born : AntFarm. AntFarm is also known as "OO-Madnes", "OO-Fever", OO-ADD, or simply design-pattern junkie. This is not the first time I've seen this, nor my associates at other companies. It seems that this style is being actively propogated, or in any case is a misunderstanding of the numerous OO/DP gospels going around... I'd like to introduce an anti-pattern to the anti-pattern: GST or "Get Stuff Done" AKA "Get Sh** done" AKA GRD (GetRDone). This pattern focused on just what it says, getting stuff done, in a simple way. I may try to outline it more in a later post, or please share your ideas on this antidote pattern. Anyway, I'm in the midst of a great example of AntFarm anti-pattern as I write (as a bonus, there is no documentation or comments). Please share you thoughts on how this anti-pattern has become so prevelant, how we can avoid it, and how can one undo or deal with this pattern in a live system one must work with!

    Read the article

  • Accessing "Public" methods from "Private" methods in javascript class

    - by mon4goos
    Is there a way to call "public" javascript functions from "private" ones within a class? Check out the class below: function Class() { this.publicMethod = function() { alert("hello"); } privateMethod = function() { publicMethod(); } this.test = function() { privateMethod(); } } Here is the code I run: var class = new Class(); class.test(); Firebug gives this error: publicMethod is not defined: [Break on this error] publicMethod(); Is there some other way to call publicMethod() within privateMethod() without accessing the global class variable [i.e. class.publicMethod()]?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56  | Next Page >