Search Results

Search found 370 results on 15 pages for 'structs'.

Page 5/15 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • C: copying some structs causes strange behavior

    - by Jenny B
    I have an annoying bug in the line rq->tickets[rq->usedContracts] = toAdd; if i do: rq->tickets[0] = toAdd the program crashes if i do rq->tickets[1] = toAdd; it works valgrind says ==19501== Use of uninitialised value of size 8 and ==19501== Invalid write of size 8 for this very line. What is wrong? struct TS_element { int travels; int originalTravels; int cost; char** dates; int moneyLeft; } TicketSet; struct RQ_element { int usedContracts; struct TS_element* tickets; } RabQav; TicketSetStatus tsCreate(TicketSet* t, int n, int c) { if (n <= 0) return TS_ILLEGAL_PARAMETER; TicketSet* myTicketSet = (TicketSet*) malloc(sizeof(TicketSet)); if (myTicketSet == NULL) { return TS_CANNOT_CREATE; } myTicketSet->usedTravels = 0; myTicketSet->originalTravels = n; myTicketSet->cost = c; myTicketSet->moneyLeft = n * c; char** dates = malloc(sizeof(char**)* (n)); //todo maybe c99 allows dynamic arrays? for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { dates[i] = malloc(sizeof(char)*GOOD_LENGTH+1); if (dates[i] == NULL) { free(dates); free(t); return TS_CANNOT_CREATE; } } myTicketSet->dates = dates; *t = *myTicketSet; return TS_SUCCESS; } static void copyTicketSets(TicketSet* dest, const TicketSet* source) { dest->usedTravels = source->usedTravels; dest->originalTravels = source->originalTravels; dest->cost = source->cost; dest->moneyLeft = source->moneyLeft; for (int i = 0; i < source->originalTravels; i++) { if (NULL != source->dates[i]) { free(dest->dates[i]); dest->dates[i] = malloc(sizeof(char) * GOOD_LENGTH + 1); if (dest->dates[i] == NULL) { free(dest->dates); //todo free dates 0...i-1 free(dest); return; } strcpy(dest->dates[i], source->dates[i]); } } } RabQavStatus rqLoadTS(RabQav* rq, TicketSet t, DateTime dt) { TicketSet toAdd; TicketSetStatus res = tsCreate(&toAdd, t.originalTravels, t.cost); if (res != TS_SUCCESS) { return RQ_FAIL; } copyTicketSets(&toAdd, &t); rq->tickets[rq->usedContracts] = toAdd; rq->usedContracts++; return RQ_SUCCESS; }

    Read the article

  • Redundant naming in C/C++ typedefs/structs

    - by bloomy
    #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> const int NAMELEN=30; const int MAXCLASSSIZE=10; typedef struct StudentRec { char lastname[NAMELEN]; char firstname[NAMELEN]; long int ID; int finalmark; }Student; I'm new to coding..and I have a question about why there is Student; after the bracket.. is it a format that we have to follow.

    Read the article

  • passing different structs to a function in c

    - by clear2k
    I have different structures that need to be filled out the same way. The only difference is that they are filled based on different data. I was wondering if it's possible to pass different structures to a certain function. What I have in mind is something like: struct stu1 { char *a; int b; }; struct stu2 { char *a; int b; }; static struct not_sure **some_func(struct not_sure *not_sure_here, original_content_list) { // do something and return passed struct for(i=0; i<size_of_original_content_list; i++){ //fill out passed structure } return the_struct; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { return_struct1 = some_func(stu1); return_struct2 = some_func(stu2); // do something separate with each return struct... } Any comments will be appreciate it.

    Read the article

  • Preferred way of filling up a C++ vector of structs

    - by henle
    Alternative 1, reusing a temporary variable: Sticker sticker; sticker.x = x + foreground.x; sticker.y = foreground.y; sticker.width = foreground.width; sticker.height = foreground.height; board.push_back(sticker); sticker.x = x + outline.x; sticker.y = outline.y; sticker.width = outline.width; sticker.height = outline.height; board.push_back(sticker); Alternative 2, scoping the temporary variable: { Sticker sticker; sticker.x = x + foreground.x; sticker.y = foreground.y; sticker.width = foreground.width; sticker.height = foreground.height; board.push_back(sticker); } { Sticker sticker; sticker.x = x + outline.x; sticker.y = outline.y; sticker.width = outline.width; sticker.height = outline.height; board.push_back(sticker); } Alternative 3, writing straight to the vector memory: { board.push_back(Sticker()); Sticker &sticker = board.back(); sticker.x = x + foreground.x; sticker.y = foreground.y; sticker.width = foreground.width; sticker.height = foreground.height; } { board.push_back(Sticker()); Sticker &sticker = board.back(); sticker.x = x + outline.x; sticker.y = outline.y; sticker.width = outline.width; sticker.height = outline.height; } Which approach do you prefer?

    Read the article

  • Problem Initializing an Array Of Structs

    - by FallSe7en
    I am trying to initialize the following array of the following struct, but my code isn't compiling. Can anybody help me out? The struct/array: struct DiningCarSeat { int status; int order; int waiterNum; Lock customerLock; Condition customer; DiningCarSeat(seatNum) { char* tempLockName; sprintf(tempLockName, "diningCarSeatLock%d", seatNum); char* tempConditionName; sprintf(tempConditionName, "diningCarSeatCondition%d", seatNum); status = 0; order = 0; waiterNum = -1; customerLock = new Lock(tempLockName); customer = new Condition(tempConditionName); } } diningCarSeat[DINING_CAR_CAPACITY]; The relevant errors: ../threads/threadtest.cc: In constructor `DiningCarSeat::DiningCarSeat(int)': ../threads/threadtest.cc:58: error: no matching function for call to `Lock::Lock()' ../threads/synch.h:66: note: candidates are: Lock::Lock(const Lock&) ../threads/synch.h:68: note: Lock::Lock(char*) ../threads/threadtest.cc:58: error: no matching function for call to `Condition::Condition()' ../threads/synch.h:119: note: candidates are: Condition::Condition(const Condition&) ../threads/synch.h:121: note: Condition::Condition(char*) ../threads/threadtest.cc:63: error: expected primary-expression before '.' token ../threads/threadtest.cc:64: error: expected primary-expression before '.' token ../threads/threadtest.cc: At global scope: ../threads/threadtest.cc:69: error: no matching function for call to `DiningCarSeat::DiningCarSeat()' ../threads/threadtest.cc:51: note: candidates are: DiningCarSeat::DiningCarSeat(const DiningCarSeat&) ../threads/threadtest.cc:58: note: DiningCarSeat::DiningCarSeat(int) Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Why structs cannot be assigned directly?

    - by becko
    Suppose I have a fully defined struct with tag MyStruct, and suppose that x, y, ..., z are allowed values for its fields. Why is struct MyStruct q = {x,y,..,z}; allowed, but struct MyStruct q; q = {x,y,...,z}; is not allowed? I find this very annoying. In the second case, where I have previously declared q, I need to assign a value to each field, one by one: q.X = x; q.Y = y; ... q.Z = z; where X, Y, ..., Z are the fields of MyStruct. Is there a reason behind this?

    Read the article

  • Where, in an object oriented system should you, if at all, choose (C-style) structs over classes?

    - by Anto
    C and most likely many other languages provide a struct keyword for creating structures (or something in a similar fashion). These are (at least in C), from a simplified point of view like classes, but without polymorphism, inheritance, methods, and so on. Think of an object-oriented (or multi paradigm) language with C-style structs. Where would you choose them over classes? Now, I don't believe they are to be used with OOP as classes seem to replace their purposes, but I wonder if there are situations where they could be preferred over classes in otherwise object-oriented programs and in what kind of situations. Are there such situations?

    Read the article

  • Comparing an array of users to an array of structs with user object as attribute, and returning matc

    - by keruilin
    I have an array of users who are friends. Let us call this array: friends I then have an array of structs. Each struct has a user object as an attribute (it also has a rank attribute). Here's what the struct class looks like, to add some context: class Leader < Struct.new(:rank, :user); end Let us call this array of structs: all_leaders_plus_rank I want to compare friends and all_leaders_plus_rank, and add the match from all_leaders_plus_rank to a new array of structs called friendly_leaders.

    Read the article

  • Practical differences between classes and structs in .net (not conceptual)?

    - by Gulshan
    Whenever I tried to search about differences between classes and structs in C# or .net, I ended up with the conceptual overview of the two things like value type or the reference type, where the variables are allocated etc. But I need some practical differences. I have found some like different behavior of assignment operator, having constructors etc. Can anybody provide some more practical differences which will be directly useful while coding? Like the things works with one but not with other or same operation showing different behavior. And some common mistakes regarding these two. Also please suggest where to consider using a struct instead of a class. And where the structs should not be used.

    Read the article

  • What is the algorithm used by the memberwise equality test in .NET structs?

    - by Damian Powell
    What is the algorithm used by the memberwise equality test in .NET structs? I would like to know this so that I can use it as the basis for my own algorithm. I am trying to write a recursive memberwise equality test for arbitrary objects (in C#) for testing the logical equality of DTOs. This is considerably easier if the DTOs are structs (since ValueType.Equals does mostly the right thing) but that is not always appropriate. I would also like to override comparison of any IEnumerable objects (but not strings!) so that their contents are compared rather than their properties. This has proven to be harder than I would expect. Any hints will be greatly appreciated. I'll accept the answer that proves most useful or supplies a link to the most useful information. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to sanely read and dump structs to disk when some fields are pointers?

    - by bp
    Hello, I'm writing a FUSE plugin in C. I'm keeping track of data structures in the filesystem through structs like: typedef struct { block_number_t inode; filename_t filename; //char[SOME_SIZE] some_other_field_t other_field; } fs_directory_table_item_t; Obviously, I have to read (write) these structs from (to) disk at some point. I could treat the struct as a sequence of bytes and do something like this: read(disk_fd, directory_table_item, sizeof(fs_directory_table_item_t)); ...except that cannot possibly work as filename is actually a pointer to the char array. I'd really like to avoid having to write code like: read(disk_df, *directory_table_item.inode, sizeof(block_number_t)); read(disk_df, directory_table_item.filename, sizeof(filename_t)); read(disk_df, *directory_table_item.other_field, sizeof(some_other_field_t)); ...for each struct in the code, because I'd have to replicate code and changes in no less than three different places (definition, reading, writing). Any DRYer but still maintainable ideas?

    Read the article

  • C: using a lot of structs can make a program slow?

    - by nunos
    I am coding a breakout clone. I had one version in which I only had one level deep of structures. This version runs at 70 fps. For more clarity in the code I decided the code should have more abstractions and created more structs. Most of the times I have two two three level deep of structures. This version runs at 30 fps. Since there are some other differences besides the structures, I ask you: Does using a lot of structs in C can slow down the code significantly? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How do I pass an array of structs (containing std:string or BSTR) from ATL to C#. SafeArray? Varian

    - by Andrew
    Hi, I have an ATL COM object that I am using from C#. The interface currently looks like: interface ICHASCom : IDispatch{ [id(1), helpstring("method Start")] HRESULT Start([in] BSTR name, [out,retval] VARIANT_BOOL* result); ... [id(4), helpstring("method GetCount")] HRESULT GetCount([out,retval] LONG* numPorts); ... [id(7), helpstring("method EnableLogging")] HRESULT EnableLogging([in] VARIANT_BOOL enableLogging); }; That is, it's a very simple interface. I also have some events that I send back too. Now, I would like to add something to the interface. In the ATL I have some results, which are currently structs and look like struct REPORT_LINE { string creationDate; string Id; string summary; }; All the members of the struct are std::string. I have an array of these that I need to get back to the C#. What's the best way to do this? I suspect someone is going to say, "hey, you can't just send std::string over COM like that. If so, fine, but what's the best way to modidfy the struct? Change the std::string to BSTR? And then how do I, 1) Set up the IDL to pass an array of structs (structs with BSTR or std::string) 2) If I must use SAFEARRAYS, how do I fill the SAFEARRAYS with the structs. I'm not familiar with COM except for use with simple types. Thanks, Dave

    Read the article

  • Why can't my vector access the variables in my nested structs?

    - by chucknorris
    #include<iostream> #include<vector> #include<string> #include<list> using namespace std; struct record{ int id; string fName; }; struct cells{ list<record> rec; }; vector<cells> hp; int main() { **hp.front().rec.front().fName = "jon"; return 0; } I have 2 structs. The first struct, struct record, is composed of 2 regular variables. In struct 2, I have a linked list of type "record", which includes all the variable listed in struct 1. Why is it that when ever I attempt to access a variable in the structs, using my vector, I get the error "linked list iterator not dereferencable?"

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to have "inherited partial structs" in c#?

    - by Balazs
    Is it possible to use partial structs to achieve something like this: Have an asp.net page base class with the following defined: public partial struct QuerystringKeys { public const string Username = "username"; public const string CurrentUser = "currentUser"; } Have an asp.net page, which inherits from the base class mentioned above, extend the partial declaration: public partial struct QuerystringKeys { /// <summary> /// The page number of the review instances list /// </summary> public const string Page = "page"; } The final goal is a QuerystringKeys struct with all three constant strings defined in it available to the asp.net page.

    Read the article

  • Writing different structs to a file in C++? [on hold]

    - by user58053
    I need a way to write structures of three different kinds to a binary file, which later has to be searched. (As in, for example, struct A has two fields, an int and a char; struct B has int and a long; I need to output all structures whose int equals the one given from keyboard). I understand how to write structs of the same kind to a file and how to search them, but here I am just lost, best thing I came up with is declaring a struct containing all possibly needed fields and leaving the ones I don't need empty, but it really feels wrong, there HAS to be a better way to do that. I've read about binary files and could not find anything relevant, most examples and tutorials deal with writing one data type. Could anyone point me in the right direction? EDIT: I am looking for what @Jerry_coffin called database mode, and will probably use one of the existing database systems for that, best way to go, probably. Thank you everybody for the suggestions

    Read the article

  • How does the CLR (.NET) internally allocate and pass around custom value types (structs)?

    - by stakx
    Question: Do all CLR value types, including user-defined structs, live on the evaluation stack exclusively, meaning that they will never need to be reclaimed by the garbage-collector, or are there cases where they are garbage-collected? Background: I have previously asked a question on SO about the impact that a fluent interface has on the runtime performance of a .NET application. I was particuarly worried that creating a large number of very short-lived temporary objects would negatively affect runtime performance through more frequent garbage-collection. Now it has occured to me that if I declared those temporary objects' types as struct (ie. as user-defined value types) instead of class, the garbage collector might not be involved at all if it turns out that all value types live exclusively on the evaluation stack. What I've found out so far: I did a brief experiment to see what the differences are in the CIL generated for user-defined value types and reference types. This is my C# code: struct SomeValueType { public int X; } class SomeReferenceType { public int X; } . . static void TryValueType(SomeValueType vt) { ... } static void TryReferenceType(SomeReferenceType rt) { ... } . . var vt = new SomeValueType { X = 1 }; var rt = new SomeReferenceType { X = 2 }; TryValueType(vt); TryReferenceType(rt); And this is the CIL generated for the last four lines of code: .locals init ( [0] valuetype SomeValueType vt, [1] class SomeReferenceType rt, [2] valuetype SomeValueType <>g__initLocal0, // [3] class SomeReferenceType <>g__initLocal1, // why are these generated? [4] valuetype SomeValueType CS$0$0000 // ) L_0000: ldloca.s CS$0$0000 L_0002: initobj SomeValueType // no newobj required, instance already allocated L_0008: ldloc.s CS$0$0000 L_000a: stloc.2 L_000b: ldloca.s <>g__initLocal0 L_000d: ldc.i4.1 L_000e: stfld int32 SomeValueType::X L_0013: ldloc.2 L_0014: stloc.0 L_0015: newobj instance void SomeReferenceType::.ctor() L_001a: stloc.3 L_001b: ldloc.3 L_001c: ldc.i4.2 L_001d: stfld int32 SomeReferenceType::X L_0022: ldloc.3 L_0023: stloc.1 L_0024: ldloc.0 L_0025: call void Program::TryValueType(valuetype SomeValueType) L_002a: ldloc.1 L_002b: call void Program::TryReferenceType(class SomeReferenceType) What I cannot figure out from this code is this: Where are all those local variables mentioned in the .locals block allocated? How are they allocated? How are they freed? Why are so many anonymous local variables needed and copied to-and-fro only to initialize my two local variables rt and vt?

    Read the article

  • Is there any way to get MSVC to pass structs arguments in registers on x64?

    - by Luke
    For a function with signature: struct Pair { void *v1, *v2 }; void f(Pair p); compiled on x64, I would like Pair's fields to be passed via register, as if the function was: void f(void *v1, void *v2); Compiling a test with gcc 4.2.1 for x86_64 on OSX 10.6, I can see this is exactly what happens by examining the disassembly. However, compiling with MSVC 2008 for x64 on Windows, the disassembly shows that Pair is passed on the stack. I understand that platform ABIs can prevent this optimization; does anyone know any MSVC-specific annotations, calling conventions, flags, or other hacks that can get this to work? Thank you!

    Read the article

  • XNA Class Design with Structs as Properties and issues because they are value types and not referenc

    - by Nate Bross
    I'm wondering how you'd recommend designin a class, given the fact that XNA Framework uses Struct all over the place? For example, a spite class, which may require a Vector2 and a Rectangle (both defined as Struct) to be accessed outside of the class. The issue come in when you try to write code like this: class Item { public Vetor2 Position {get; set;} public Item() { Position = new Vector2(5,5); } } Item i = new Item(); i.Positon.X = 20; // fails with error 'Cannot modify the return value of Item because it is not a variable.' // you must write code like this var pos = i.Position; pos.X++; i.Position = pos; The second option compiles and works, but it is just butt ugly. Is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • In Python, how to use a C++ function which returns an allocated array of structs via a ** parameter?

    - by Jon-Eric
    I'd like to use some existing C++ code, NvTriStrip, in a Python tool. SWIG easily handles the functions with simple parameters, but the main function, GenerateStrips, is much more complicated. What do I need to put in the SWIG interface file to indicate that primGroups is really an output parameter and that it must be cleaned up with delete[]? /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // GenerateStrips() // // in_indices: input index list, the indices you would use to render // in_numIndices: number of entries in in_indices // primGroups: array of optimized/stripified PrimitiveGroups // numGroups: number of groups returned // // Be sure to call delete[] on the returned primGroups to avoid leaking mem // bool GenerateStrips( const unsigned short* in_indices, const unsigned int in_numIndices, PrimitiveGroup** primGroups, unsigned short* numGroups, bool validateEnabled = false ); FYI, here is the PrimitiveGroup declaration: enum PrimType { PT_LIST, PT_STRIP, PT_FAN }; struct PrimitiveGroup { PrimType type; unsigned int numIndices; unsigned short* indices; PrimitiveGroup() : type(PT_STRIP), numIndices(0), indices(NULL) {} ~PrimitiveGroup() { if(indices) delete[] indices; indices = NULL; } };

    Read the article

  • Why does accessing a member of a malloced array of structs seg fault?

    - by WSkinner
    I am working through Learn C The Hard Way and am stumped on something. I've written a simplified version of the problem I am running into to make it easier to get down to it. Here is the code: #include <stdlib.h> #define GROUP_SIZE 10 #define DATA_SIZE 64 struct Dummy { char *name; }; struct Group { struct Dummy **dummies; }; int main() { struct Group *group1 = malloc(sizeof(struct Group)); group1->dummies = malloc(sizeof(struct Dummy) * GROUP_SIZE); struct Dummy *dummy1 = group1->dummies[3]; // Why does this seg fault? dummy1->name = (char *) malloc(DATA_SIZE); return 0; } when I try to set the name pointer on one of my dummies I get a seg fault. Using valgrind it tells me this is uninitialized space. Why is this?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >