Search Results

Search found 1739 results on 70 pages for 'castle activerecord'.

Page 50/70 | < Previous Page | 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57  | Next Page >

  • ruby-on-rails: update_attributes overrides model validations?

    - by cbrulak
    I have a typical, Post model: class Post< ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :user_id #Line 1 validates_presence_of :title,:body #Line 2 in the controller, I have: def create if request.post? if login_required @post = Post.new(params[:post]) #Line 3 @post .update_attribute("user_id",session[:userid]) #Line 4 However, if the validations on Line 2 fail the Post will still be created, unless Line 4 is commented out. 1) Why? 2) Suggestions on a fix? Thanks

    Read the article

  • rake: command not found

    - by Errol Siegel
    I'm trying to install rails on Ubuntu 9.10. gem list --local *** LOCAL GEMS *** actionmailer (2.3.4, 2.3.2) actionpack (2.3.4, 2.3.2) activerecord (2.3.4, 2.3.2) activeresource (2.3.4, 2.3.2) activesupport (2.3.4, 2.3.2) rack (1.0.1) rails (2.3.4, 2.3.2) rake (0.8.7) sqlite3-ruby (1.2.5) rake The program 'rake' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing: sudo apt-get install rake rake: command not found How do I solve this?

    Read the article

  • Rails offen lost connection to oracle database

    - by qichunren
    I sometimes got this error from my log/production.log file: #<ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: OCIError: ORA-03114: not connected to ORACLE: select decode(table_name,upper(table_name),lower(table_name),table_name) name from all_tables where owner = sys_context('userenv','session_user')>, How to solve this? How to rescue this and reconnect to oracle database?

    Read the article

  • will_paginate with named_scopes

    - by Lowgain
    I'm using will_paginate for pagination, which has been working well so far, except for this one thing. If I try to paginate a scope, for instance class User < ActiveRecord::Base named_scope :scope, lambda { etc } end User.scope.paginate({:page => params[:page], :per_page => 10}) That will tell me paginate is an undefined method. I'd rather not have to use a second solution for only this scope, is there something I can do here?

    Read the article

  • #validate does not seem to work correctly with :on => :create/:update

    - by Tobias
    Greetings, I have a custom validation in my exemplary Movie model: class Movie < ActiveRecord::Base validate :it, :on => :create private def it self.errors.add 'foo', 'bar' end end This works on movie creation but also on updating an existing movie. :on => :update will also work for both. Might that be a bug or am I missing something? Best regards Tobias

    Read the article

  • How to return children objects?

    - by keruilin
    I have -- what I think -- is a simple question. Here's my code: class Fruit < ActiveRecord::Base end class Apple < Fruit end class Kiwi < Fruit end Assume that I have all the STI setup correctly, and there are multiple types of Apple and Kiwi records in the table. From here... fruits = Fruit.find(:all) ...how do I return an array of just Apples from the fruits array?

    Read the article

  • Rails find over multiple models

    - by kgb
    I think I'm missing something very obvious and its making my brain hurt. class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :profile class Profile < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :user belongs_to :team I have a partial that loops through the users and print some basic info, I'm using this partial in my team show page. I had originally written this to return users who's profiles were a member of a team. def show @team = Team.find_by_id(params[:id]) @profiles= Profile.find(:all, :conditions => ['team_id = ?', @team.id]) @users = User.find_by_id(@profiles.user_id) end But quickly realized @profiles was an array, and it looks messy as hell. Stuck as to what my find should look like to select all User who have a profile that is a member of a team. The partial that is working elsewhere for displaying users looks like this <% for user in @users%> <table> <tr> <td> <%= image_tag user.profile.picture.url %> </td> <td> <a href="/users/<%= user.id %>"><%= user.login %></a> </td> <td> <%= user.profile.first_name %> <%= user.profile.second_name %> </td> <td> <%= user.profile.status %> </td> </tr> </table> <% end %> Development log output with updated show and relationships Processing TeamsController#show (for 127.0.0.1 at 2010-03-30 22:06:31) [GET] Parameters: {"id"=>"1"} User Load (1.3ms) SELECT * FROM "users" WHERE ("users"."id" = 3) LIMIT 1 Team Load (1.0ms) SELECT * FROM "teams" WHERE ("teams"."id" = 1) Rendering template within layouts/main Rendering teams/show Completed in 75ms (View: 11, DB: 2) | 200 OK [http://localhost/teams/1]

    Read the article

  • Override to_json in Rails 2.3.5

    - by smotchkkiss
    I've seen some other examples on SO, but I none do what I'm looking for. I'm trying: class User < ActiveRecord::Base def to_json super(:only => :username, :methods => [:foo, :bar]) end end I'm getting ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (1 for 0). Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Putting update logic in your migrations

    - by Daniel Abrahamsson
    A couple of times I've been in the situation where I've wanted to refactor the design of some model and have ended up putting update logic in migrations. However, as far as I've understood, this is not good practice (especially since you are encouraged to use your schema file for deployment, and not your migrations). How do you deal with these kind of problems? To clearify what I mean, say I have a User model. Since I thought there would only be two kinds of users, namely a "normal" user and an administrator, I chose to use a simple boolean field telling whether the user was an adminstrator or not. However, after I while I figured I needed some third kind of user, perhaps a moderator or something similar. In this case I add a UserType model (and the corresponding migration), and a second migration for removing the "admin" flag from the user table. And here comes the problem. In the "add_user_type_to_users" migration I have to map the admin flag value to a user type. Additionally, in order to do this, the user types have to exist, meaning I can not use the seeds file, but rather create the user types in the migration (also considered bad practice). Here comes some fictional code representing the situation: class CreateUserTypes < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :user_types do |t| t.string :name, :nil => false, :unique => true end #Create basic types (can not put in seed, because of future migration dependency) UserType.create!(:name => "BASIC") UserType.create!(:name => "MODERATOR") UserType.create!(:name => "ADMINISTRATOR") end def self.down drop_table :user_types end end class AddTypeIdToUsers < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up add_column :users, :type_id, :integer #Determine type via the admin flag basic = UserType.find_by_name("BASIC") admin = UserType.find_by_name("ADMINISTRATOR") User.all.each {|u| u.update_attribute(:type_id, (u.admin?) ? admin.id : basic.id)} #Remove the admin flag remove_column :users, :admin #Add foreign key execute "alter table users add constraint fk_user_type_id foreign key (type_id) references user_types (id)" end def self.down #Re-add the admin flag add_column :users, :admin, :boolean, :default => false #Reset the admin flag (this is the problematic update code) admin = UserType.find_by_name("ADMINISTRATOR") execute "update users set admin=true where type_id=#{admin.id}" #Remove foreign key constraint execute "alter table users drop foreign key fk_user_type_id" #Drop the type_id column remove_column :users, :type_id end end As you can see there are two problematic parts. First the row creation part in the first model, which is necessary if I would like to run all migrations in a row, then the "update" part in the second migration that maps the "admin" column to the "type_id" column. Any advice?

    Read the article

  • weird behavior with acts_as_taggable_on

    - by macek
    For some reason, tags aren't showing up on a taggable object when an tagger is specified. testing the post class Post < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_taggable_on :tags belongs_to :user end >> p = Post.first => #<Post id: 1, ...> >> p.is_taggable? => true >> p.tag_list = "foo, bar" => "foo, bar" >> p.save => true >> p.tags => [#<Tag id: 1, name: "foo">, #<Tag id: 2, name: "bar">] testing the user class User < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_tagger has_many :posts end >> u = User.first => #<User id: 1, ...> >> u.is_tagger? => true >> u.tag(p, :with => "hello, world", :on => :tags) => true >> u.owned_tags => [#<Tag id: 3, name: "hello">, #<Tag id: 4, name: "world">] refresh the post >> p = Post.first => #<Post id: 1 ...> >> p.tags => [#<Tag id: 2, name: "bar">, #<Tag id: 1, name: "foo">] Where's the hello and world tags? Miraculously, if I modify the database directly to set tagger_id and tagger_type to NULL, the two missing tags will show up. I suspect there's something wrong with my User model? What gives?

    Read the article

  • test_case files in rails components

    - by Joseph Misiti
    i noticed there are a bunch of test_case.rb files delivered in the rails components: ./actionmailer-2.3.5/lib/action_mailer/test_case.rb ./actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/test_case.rb ./actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_view/test_case.rb ./activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/test_case.rb ./activesupport-2.3.5/lib/active_support/test_case.rb i am wondering how to execute these files. I cant seem to figure out how to do it?

    Read the article

  • Dynamic Attachment Size for Paperclip (Rails)

    - by CalebHC
    Is there anyway to have the validates_attachment_size except a dynamic file size limit? Here's an example: class Document < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :folder has_attached_file :document validates_attachment_size :document, :less_than => get_current_file_size_limit private def get_current_file_size_limit 10.megabytes # This will dynamically change end end I've tried this but I keep getting an error saying "unknown method". Lambdas and Procs don't work either. Has anyone ever tried this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • How do I reconnect to Memcache when forking in rails?

    - by Daniel Huckstep
    I have a rails 3 application, and a script called by rails runner. This script forks and does some stuff in other processes. I do the proper thing with ActiveRecord before forking, where I disconnect-fork-reconnect and all that jazz. My question is I also use memcache for the Rails.cache but should I be disconnecting-reconnecting that too for my forks? If so, how would I go about that in the rails way.

    Read the article

  • Validate uniqueness within a recent set

    - by Matchu
    Is there a standard Rails 3 way of detecting uniqueness within a particular scope, or is this custom validation all I can do? class Post < ActiveRecord::Base # [named scope for recent posts] validates do |post| if Post.recent.where('url = ?', post.url).count > 0 errors[:url] = 'has already been posted recently - thanks anyway!' end end end (Haven't yet tried that exact code, so there may be errors, but you get the idea.)

    Read the article

  • Associated models in Rails?

    - by dannymcc
    Hi Everyone, In my rails application I have two models called Kases and Notes. They work in the same way comments do with blog posts, I.e. each Kase entry can have multiple notes attached to it. I have got everything working, but for some reason I cannot get the destroy link to work for the Notes. I think I am overlooking something that is different with associated models to standard models. Notes Controller class NotesController < ApplicationController # POST /notes # POST /notes.xml def create @kase = Kase.find(params[:kase_id]) @note = @kase.notes.create!(params[:note]) respond_to do |format| format.html { redirect_to @kase } format.js end end end Kase Model class Kase < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :jobno has_many :notes Note Model class Note < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :kase end In the Kase show view I call a partial within /notes called _notes.html.erb: Kase Show View <div id="notes"> <h2>Notes</h2> <%= render :partial => @kase.notes %> <% form_for [@kase, Note.new] do |f| %> <p> <h3>Add a new note</h3> <%= f.text_field :body %><%= f.submit "Add Note" %> </p> <% end %> </div> /notes/_note.html.erb <% div_for note do %> <div id="sub-notes"> <p> <%= h(note.body) %><br /> <span style="font-size:smaller">Created <%= time_ago_in_words(note.created_at) %> ago on <%= note.created_at %></span> </p> <%= link_to "Remove Note", kase_path(@kase), :confirm => 'Are you sure?', :method => :delete, :class => 'important' %> </div> <% end %> As you can see, I have a Remove Note destroy link, but that destroys the entire Kase the note is associated with. How do I make the destroy link remove only the note? <%= link_to "Remove Note", kase_path(@kase), :confirm => 'Are you sure?', :method => :delete, :class => 'important' %> Any help would, as always, be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Danny

    Read the article

  • How to import RoR project to Netbeans

    - by user369759
    I have very simple (in fact empty ) project which i have created by rails new MyProject command from command-line. So, i want to import it to NetBeans IDE. I click "new project" - "RoR" - "from existing source", select Ruby 1.9.2 (instead of embedded JRuby) in the wizard form. After that i have got errors [see the picture below]: So.. i click OK. And then try to run the RoR application from NetBeans clicking on the run-button and i got the following error in the log-panel: /home/ses/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p136/bin/ruby: No such file or directory -- script/server (LoadError) So how to handle these two problems? and, replying the comment to my question. yes, i performed following commands: bundle install Using rake (0.8.7) Using abstract (1.0.0) Using activesupport (3.0.3) Using builder (2.1.2) Using i18n (0.5.0) Using activemodel (3.0.3) Using erubis (2.6.6) Using rack (1.2.1) Using rack-mount (0.6.13) Using rack-test (0.5.7) Using tzinfo (0.3.24) Using actionpack (3.0.3) Using mime-types (1.16) Using polyglot (0.3.1) Using treetop (1.4.9) Using mail (2.2.15) Using actionmailer (3.0.3) Using arel (2.0.7) Using activerecord (3.0.3) Using activeresource (3.0.3) Using bundler (1.0.10) Using mysql2 (0.2.6) Using thor (0.14.6) Using railties (3.0.3) Using rails (3.0.3) p.s. my application is working when i launch it from the console. i use ruby-1.9.2 and RoR 3.0 and Netbeans 6.9.1 and Ubuntu 10.10 bundle pack Using rake (0.8.7) Using abstract (1.0.0) Using activesupport (3.0.3) Using builder (2.1.2) Using i18n (0.5.0) Using activemodel (3.0.3) Using erubis (2.6.6) Using rack (1.2.1) Using rack-mount (0.6.13) Using rack-test (0.5.7) Using tzinfo (0.3.24) Using actionpack (3.0.3) Using mime-types (1.16) Using polyglot (0.3.1) Using treetop (1.4.9) Using mail (2.2.15) Using actionmailer (3.0.3) Using arel (2.0.7) Using activerecord (3.0.3) Using activeresource (3.0.3) Using bundler (1.0.10) Using mysql2 (0.2.6) Using thor (0.14.6) Using railties (3.0.3) Using rails (3.0.3) Updating .gem files in vendor/cache Your bundle is complete! Use `bundle show [gemname]` to see where a bundled gem is installed. Updating .gem files in vendor/cache

    Read the article

  • Can't start rails server after 3.0.1 upgrade

    - by Alberto
    Followed instructions on Railscast but can't get server to start. It states the following error: $ rails s script/rails:6:in `require': no such file to load -- rails/commands (LoadError)` from script/rails:6:in `<main>' Saw the answer on this related question but my Gemfile has no reference to any rails 2.x version and in the "bundle install" results i get this in the results: "Using rails (3.0.1)" EDIT: (adding Gemfile.lock details) GEM remote: http://rubygems.org/ specs: abstract (1.0.0) actionmailer (3.0.1) actionpack (= 3.0.1) mail (~> 2.2.5) actionpack (3.0.1) activemodel (= 3.0.1) activesupport (= 3.0.1) builder (~> 2.1.2) erubis (~> 2.6.6) i18n (~> 0.4.1) rack (~> 1.2.1) rack-mount (~> 0.6.12) rack-test (~> 0.5.4) tzinfo (~> 0.3.23) activemodel (3.0.1) activesupport (= 3.0.1) builder (~> 2.1.2) i18n (~> 0.4.1) activerecord (3.0.1) activemodel (= 3.0.1) activesupport (= 3.0.1) arel (~> 1.0.0) tzinfo (~> 0.3.23) activeresource (3.0.1) activemodel (= 3.0.1) activesupport (= 3.0.1) activesupport (3.0.1) arel (1.0.1) activesupport (~> 3.0.0) builder (2.1.2) calendar_date_select (1.16.1) erubis (2.6.6) abstract (>= 1.0.0) googlecharts (1.6.0) i18n (0.4.2) mail (2.2.9) activesupport (>= 2.3.6) i18n (~> 0.4.1) mime-types (~> 1.16) treetop (~> 1.4.8) mechanize (1.0.0) nokogiri (>= 1.2.1) mime-types (1.16) nokogiri (1.4.3.1) pg (0.9.0) polyglot (0.3.1) rack (1.2.1) rack-mount (0.6.13) rack (>= 1.0.0) rack-test (0.5.6) rack (>= 1.0) rails (3.0.1) actionmailer (= 3.0.1) actionpack (= 3.0.1) activerecord (= 3.0.1) activeresource (= 3.0.1) activesupport (= 3.0.1) bundler (~> 1.0.0) railties (= 3.0.1) railties (3.0.1) actionpack (= 3.0.1) activesupport (= 3.0.1) rake (>= 0.8.4) thor (~> 0.14.0) rake (0.8.7) sparklines (0.5.2) thor (0.14.4) treetop (1.4.8) polyglot (>= 0.3.1) tzinfo (0.3.23) PLATFORMS ruby DEPENDENCIES calendar_date_select googlecharts mechanize pg rails (= 3.0.1) sparklines EDIT: (adding Boot.rb details) require 'rubygems' # Set up gems listed in the Gemfile. gemfile = File.expand_path('../../Gemfile', __FILE__) begin ENV['BUNDLE_GEMFILE'] = gemfile require 'bundler' Bundler.setup rescue Bundler::GemNotFound => e STDERR.puts e.message STDERR.puts "Try running `bundle install`." exit! end if File.exist?(gemfile)

    Read the article

  • Rails. Putting update logic in your migrations

    - by Daniel Abrahamsson
    A couple of times I've been in the situation where I've wanted to refactor the design of some model and have ended up putting update logic in migrations. However, as far as I've understood, this is not good practice (especially since you are encouraged to use your schema file for deployment, and not your migrations). How do you deal with these kind of problems? To clearify what I mean, say I have a User model. Since I thought there would only be two kinds of users, namely a "normal" user and an administrator, I chose to use a simple boolean field telling whether the user was an adminstrator or not. However, after I while I figured I needed some third kind of user, perhaps a moderator or something similar. In this case I add a UserType model (and the corresponding migration), and a second migration for removing the "admin" flag from the user table. And here comes the problem. In the "add_user_type_to_users" migration I have to map the admin flag value to a user type. Additionally, in order to do this, the user types have to exist, meaning I can not use the seeds file, but rather create the user types in the migration (also considered bad practice). Here comes some fictional code representing the situation: class CreateUserTypes < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :user_types do |t| t.string :name, :nil => false, :unique => true end #Create basic types (can not put in seed, because of future migration dependency) UserType.create!(:name => "BASIC") UserType.create!(:name => "MODERATOR") UserType.create!(:name => "ADMINISTRATOR") end def self.down drop_table :user_types end end class AddTypeIdToUsers < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up add_column :users, :type_id, :integer #Determine type via the admin flag basic = UserType.find_by_name("BASIC") admin = UserType.find_by_name("ADMINISTRATOR") User.all.each {|u| u.update_attribute(:type_id, (u.admin?) ? admin.id : basic.id)} #Remove the admin flag remove_column :users, :admin #Add foreign key execute "alter table users add constraint fk_user_type_id foreign key (type_id) references user_types (id)" end def self.down #Re-add the admin flag add_column :users, :admin, :boolean, :default => false #Reset the admin flag (this is the problematic update code) admin = UserType.find_by_name("ADMINISTRATOR") execute "update users set admin=true where type_id=#{admin.id}" #Remove foreign key constraint execute "alter table users drop foreign key fk_user_type_id" #Drop the type_id column remove_column :users, :type_id end end As you can see there are two problematic parts. First the row creation part in the first model, which is necessary if I would like to run all migrations in a row, then the "update" part in the second migration that maps the "admin" column to the "type_id" column. Any advice?

    Read the article

  • What is the most elegant way to validate the presence of ONLY one out of two attributes using Rails?

    - by marcgg
    class Followup < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :post belongs_to :comment end This model needs to only have either a post or a comment, but only one of the two. Here's the rspec for what I'm trying to do: it "should be impossible to have both a comment and a post" do followup = Followup.make followup.comment = Comment.make followup.should be_valid followup.post = Post.make followup.should_not be_valid end I can see a bunch of ways of doing this, but what would be the most elegant way of doing this?

    Read the article

  • Why is RSpec so slow under Rails?

    - by Adrian Dunston
    Whenever I run rspec tests for my Rails application it takes forever and a day of overhead before it actually starts running tests. Why is rspec so slow? Is there a way to speed up Rails' initial load or single out the part of my Rails app I need (e.g. ActiveRecord stuff only) so it doesn't load absolutely everything to run a few tests?

    Read the article

  • ROR heroku PostGres issue

    - by oelbrenner
    getting error: ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid (PGError: ERROR: argument of HAVING must be type boolean, not type timestamp without time zone controller code snippet: def inactive @number_days = params[:days].to_i || 90 @clients = Client.find(:all, :include = :appointments, :conditions = ["clients.user_id = ? AND appointments.start_time <= ?", current_user.id, @number_days.days.ago], :group = 'client_id', :having = 'MAX(appointments.start_time)' ) end

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57  | Next Page >