Search Results

Search found 1900 results on 76 pages for 'xserve raid'.

Page 54/76 | < Previous Page | 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61  | Next Page >

• Slow local file transfer (copy) on ESX vmware server?

  - by Sorin Sbarnea

  I have a 8 CPU VmWare ESX server (3.5) with 4 HDD drives in RAID that is not loaded at all. I enabled SSH and installed mc (midnight commander) in order to be able to copy(clone) virtual machines but I observed that if does copy the files very slow - around 3.5mb/s on local drive. Why is this happening and how should I solve the issue?

  Read the article

• JBOD with PERC H810

  - by primero

  I'm wondering if anybody has ever used Dell storage products like the MD3220 array in a JBOD configuration. From what I can tell only perc h810 will work for external JBOD but that is not terribly specific, and for some reason I couldn't find many examples on the web of people configuring dell storage products as JBOD. My question is: Is it possible to connect to am MD3220 array, or other Dell arrays using a PERC h810 controller and use it as JBOD, and if so do I have to configure every disk in the array as a RAID 0 volume?

  Read the article

• Openfiler The NFS server does not support MOUNT version 3 over TCP

  - by chrisling106

  Hi there, I no longer able to mount my Openfiler NAS after created a new RAID10 array (but dun think that has anything to do with the new RAID setup) from my ESXi box. The NFS server does not support MOUNT version 3 over TCP Any ideas, please?

  Read the article

• Failed MDADM Array With Ext.4 Partition - "e2fsck: unable to set superblock flags on /dev/md0"

  - by Matthew Hodgkins

  Had a power failure and now my mdadm array is having problems. sudo mdadm -D /dev/md0 [hodge@hodge-fs ~]$ sudo mdadm -D /dev/md0 /dev/md0: Version : 0.90 Creation Time : Sun Apr 25 01:39:25 2010 Raid Level : raid5 Array Size : 8790815232 (8383.57 GiB 9001.79 GB) Used Dev Size : 1465135872 (1397.26 GiB 1500.30 GB) Raid Devices : 7 Total Devices : 7 Preferred Minor : 0 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Update Time : Sat Aug 7 19:10:28 2010 State : clean, degraded, recovering Active Devices : 6 Working Devices : 7 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 1 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 128K Rebuild Status : 10% complete UUID : 44a8f730:b9bea6ea:3a28392c:12b22235 (local to host hodge-fs) Events : 0.1307608 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 0 8 81 0 active sync /dev/sdf1 1 8 97 1 active sync /dev/sdg1 2 8 113 2 active sync /dev/sdh1 3 8 65 3 active sync /dev/sde1 4 8 49 4 active sync /dev/sdd1 7 8 33 5 spare rebuilding /dev/sdc1 6 8 16 6 active sync /dev/sdb sudo mount -a [hodge@hodge-fs ~]$ sudo mount -a mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/md0, missing codepage or helper program, or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so sudo fsck.ext4 /dev/md0 [hodge@hodge-fs ~]$ sudo fsck.ext4 /dev/md0 e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) fsck.ext4: Group descriptors look bad... trying backup blocks... /dev/md0: recovering journal fsck.ext4: unable to set superblock flags on /dev/md0 sudo dumpe2fs /dev/md0 | grep -i superblock [hodge@hodge-fs ~]$ sudo dumpe2fs /dev/md0 | grep -i superblock dumpe2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) Primary superblock at 0, Group descriptors at 1-524 Backup superblock at 32768, Group descriptors at 32769-33292 Backup superblock at 98304, Group descriptors at 98305-98828 Backup superblock at 163840, Group descriptors at 163841-164364 Backup superblock at 229376, Group descriptors at 229377-229900 Backup superblock at 294912, Group descriptors at 294913-295436 Backup superblock at 819200, Group descriptors at 819201-819724 Backup superblock at 884736, Group descriptors at 884737-885260 Backup superblock at 1605632, Group descriptors at 1605633-1606156 Backup superblock at 2654208, Group descriptors at 2654209-2654732 Backup superblock at 4096000, Group descriptors at 4096001-4096524 Backup superblock at 7962624, Group descriptors at 7962625-7963148 Backup superblock at 11239424, Group descriptors at 11239425-11239948 Backup superblock at 20480000, Group descriptors at 20480001-20480524 Backup superblock at 23887872, Group descriptors at 23887873-23888396 Backup superblock at 71663616, Group descriptors at 71663617-71664140 Backup superblock at 78675968, Group descriptors at 78675969-78676492 Backup superblock at 102400000, Group descriptors at 102400001-102400524 Backup superblock at 214990848, Group descriptors at 214990849-214991372 Backup superblock at 512000000, Group descriptors at 512000001-512000524 Backup superblock at 550731776, Group descriptors at 550731777-550732300 Backup superblock at 644972544, Group descriptors at 644972545-644973068 Backup superblock at 1934917632, Group descriptors at 1934917633-1934918156 sudo e2fsck -b 32768 /dev/md0 [hodge@hodge-fs ~]$ sudo e2fsck -b 32768 /dev/md0 e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) /dev/md0: recovering journal e2fsck: unable to set superblock flags on /dev/md0 sudo dmesg | tail [hodge@hodge-fs ~]$ sudo dmesg | tail EXT4-fs (md0): ext4_check_descriptors: Checksum for group 0 failed (59837!=29115) EXT4-fs (md0): group descriptors corrupted! EXT4-fs (md0): ext4_check_descriptors: Checksum for group 0 failed (59837!=29115) EXT4-fs (md0): group descriptors corrupted! Please Help!!!

  Read the article

• HP SmartArray P212 with non HP disks, Insight Diagnostics error

  - by yonatan

  I have an ML110 G6 with a SmartArray P212 and two Seagate (non-HP) SAS disks in Raid 1. When I ran HP Insight Diagnostics I got some errors related to S.M.A.R.T. error testing and I would like to confirm that this is due to the controller not being able to query the drives as they are non-HP. I believe that the drives are not failing, but I want to be sure. Please have a look at these screenshots I took from the Insight Diagnostics report:

  Read the article

• Why load increase ,ssd iops increase but cpu iowait decrease?

  - by mq44944

  There is a strange thing on my server which has a mysql running on it. The QPS is more than 4000 but TPS is less than 20. The server load is more than 80 and cpu usr is more than 86% but iowait is less than 8%. The disk iops is more than 16000 and util of disk is more than 99%. When the QPS decreases, the load decreases, the cpu iowait increases. I can't catch this! root@mypc # dmidecode | grep "Product Name" Product Name: PowerEdge R510 Product Name: 084YMW root@mypc # megacli -PDList -aALL |grep "Inquiry Data" Inquiry Data: SEAGATE ST3600057SS ES656SL316PT Inquiry Data: SEAGATE ST3600057SS ES656SL30THV Inquiry Data: ATA INTEL SSDSA2CW300362CVPR201602A6300EGN Inquiry Data: ATA INTEL SSDSA2CW300362CVPR2044037K300EGN Inquiry Data: ATA INTEL SSDSA2CW300362CVPR204402PX300EGN Inquiry Data: ATA INTEL SSDSA2CW300362CVPR204403WN300EGN Inquiry Data: ATA INTEL SSDSA2CW300362CVPR202000HU300EGN Inquiry Data: ATA INTEL SSDSA2CW300362CVPR202001E7300EGN Inquiry Data: ATA INTEL SSDSA2CW300362CVPR204402WE300EGN Inquiry Data: ATA INTEL SSDSA2CW300362CVPR204404E5300EGN Inquiry Data: ATA INTEL SSDSA2CW300362CVPR204401QF300EGN Inquiry Data: ATA INTEL SSDSA2CW300362CVPR20450001300EGN the mysql data files lie on the ssd disks which are organizaed using RAID 10. root@mypc # megacli -LDInfo -L1 -a0 Adapter 0 -- Virtual Drive Information: Virtual Disk: 1 (Target Id: 1) Name: RAID Level: Primary-1, Secondary-0, RAID Level Qualifier-0 Size:1427840MB State: Optimal Stripe Size: 64kB Number Of Drives:2 Span Depth:5 Default Cache Policy: WriteThrough, ReadAheadNone, Direct, No Write Cache if Bad BBU Current Cache Policy: WriteThrough, ReadAheadNone, Direct, No Write Cache if Bad BBU Access Policy: Read/Write Disk Cache Policy: Disk's Default Exit Code: 0x00 -------- -----load-avg---- ---cpu-usage--- ---swap--- -------------------------io-usage----------------------- -QPS- -TPS- -Hit%- time | 1m 5m 15m |usr sys idl iow| si so| r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s queue await svctm %util| ins upd del sel iud| lor hit| 09:05:29|79.80 64.49 42.00| 82 7 6 5| 0 0|16421.1 10.6262705.9 85.2 8.3 0.5 0.1 99.5| 0 0 0 3968 0| 495482 96.58| 09:05:30|79.80 64.49 42.00| 79 7 8 6| 0 0|15907.4 230.6254409.7 6357.5 8.4 0.5 0.1 98.5| 0 0 0 4195 0| 496434 96.68| 09:05:31|81.34 65.07 42.31| 81 7 7 5| 0 0|16198.7 8.6259029.2 99.8 8.1 0.5 0.1 99.3| 0 0 0 4220 0| 508983 96.70| 09:05:32|81.34 65.07 42.31| 82 7 5 5| 0 0|16746.6 8.7267853.3 92.4 8.5 0.5 0.1 99.4| 0 0 0 4084 0| 503834 96.54| 09:05:33|81.34 65.07 42.31| 81 7 6 5| 0 0|16498.7 9.6263856.8 92.3 8.0 0.5 0.1 99.3| 0 0 0 4030 0| 507051 96.60| 09:05:34|81.34 65.07 42.31| 80 8 7 6| 0 0|16328.4 11.5261101.6 95.8 8.1 0.5 0.1 98.3| 0 0 0 4119 0| 504409 96.63| 09:05:35|81.31 65.33 42.52| 82 7 6 5| 0 0|16374.0 8.7261921.9 92.5 8.1 0.5 0.1 99.7| 0 0 0 4127 0| 507279 96.66| 09:05:36|81.31 65.33 42.52| 81 8 6 5| 0 0|16496.2 8.6263832.0 84.5 8.5 0.5 0.1 99.2| 0 0 0 4100 0| 505054 96.59| 09:05:37|81.31 65.33 42.52| 82 8 6 4| 0 0|16239.4 9.6259768.8 84.3 8.0 0.5 0.1 99.1| 0 0 0 4273 0| 510621 96.72| 09:05:38|81.31 65.33 42.52| 81 7 6 5| 0 0|16349.6 8.7261439.2 81.4 8.2 0.5 0.1 98.9| 0 0 0 4171 0| 510145 96.67| 09:05:39|81.31 65.33 42.52| 82 7 6 5| 0 0|16116.8 8.7257667.6 96.5 8.0 0.5 0.1 99.1| 0 0 0 4348 0| 513093 96.74| 09:05:40|79.60 65.24 42.61| 79 7 7 7| 0 0|16154.2 242.9258390.4 6388.4 8.5 0.5 0.1 99.0| 0 0 0 4033 0| 507244 96.70| 09:05:41|79.60 65.24 42.61| 79 7 8 6| 0 0|16583.1 21.2265129.6 173.5 8.2 0.5 0.1 99.1| 0 0 0 3995 0| 501474 96.57| 09:05:42|79.60 65.24 42.61| 81 8 6 5| 0 0|16281.0 9.7260372.2 69.5 8.3 0.5 0.1 98.7| 0 0 0 4221 0| 509322 96.70| 09:05:43|79.60 65.24 42.61| 80 7 7 6| 0 0|16355.3 8.7261515.5 104.3 8.2 0.5 0.1 99.6| 0 0 0 4087 0| 502052 96.62| -------- -----load-avg---- ---cpu-usage--- ---swap--- -------------------------io-usage----------------------- -QPS- -TPS- -Hit%- time | 1m 5m 15m |usr sys idl iow| si so| r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s queue await svctm %util| ins upd del sel iud| lor hit| 09:05:44|79.60 65.24 42.61| 83 7 5 4| 0 0|16469.4 11.6263387.0 138.8 8.2 0.5 0.1 98.7| 0 0 0 4292 0| 509979 96.65| 09:05:45|79.07 65.37 42.77| 80 7 6 6| 0 0|16659.5 9.7266478.7 85.0 8.4 0.5 0.1 98.5| 0 0 0 3899 0| 496234 96.54| 09:05:46|79.07 65.37 42.77| 78 7 7 8| 0 0|16752.9 8.7267921.8 97.1 8.4 0.5 0.1 98.9| 0 0 0 4126 0| 508300 96.57| 09:05:47|79.07 65.37 42.77| 82 7 6 5| 0 0|16657.2 9.6266439.3 84.3 8.3 0.5 0.1 98.9| 0 0 0 4086 0| 502171 96.57| 09:05:48|79.07 65.37 42.77| 79 8 6 6| 0 0|16814.5 8.7268924.1 77.6 8.5 0.5 0.1 99.0| 0 0 0 4059 0| 499645 96.52| 09:05:49|79.07 65.37 42.77| 81 7 6 5| 0 0|16553.0 6.8264708.6 42.5 8.3 0.5 0.1 99.4| 0 0 0 4249 0| 501623 96.60| 09:05:50|79.63 65.71 43.01| 79 7 7 7| 0 0|16295.1 246.9260475.0 6442.4 8.7 0.5 0.1 99.1| 0 0 0 4231 0| 511032 96.70| 09:05:51|79.63 65.71 43.01| 80 7 6 6| 0 0|16568.9 8.7264919.7 104.7 8.3 0.5 0.1 99.7| 0 0 0 4272 0| 517177 96.68| 09:05:53|79.63 65.71 43.01| 79 7 7 6| 0 0|16539.0 8.6264502.9 87.6 8.4 0.5 0.1 98.9| 0 0 0 3992 0| 496728 96.52| 09:05:54|79.63 65.71 43.01| 79 7 7 7| 0 0|16527.5 11.6264363.6 92.6 8.5 0.5 0.1 98.8| 0 0 0 4045 0| 502944 96.59| 09:05:55|79.63 65.71 43.01| 80 7 7 6| 0 0|16374.7 12.5261687.2 134.9 8.6 0.5 0.1 99.2| 0 0 0 4143 0| 507006 96.66| 09:05:56|76.05 65.20 42.96| 77 8 8 8| 0 0|16464.9 9.6263314.3 111.9 8.5 0.5 0.1 98.9| 0 0 0 4250 0| 505417 96.64| 09:05:57|76.05 65.20 42.96| 79 7 6 7| 0 0|16460.1 8.8263283.2 93.4 8.3 0.5 0.1 98.8| 0 0 0 4294 0| 508168 96.66| 09:05:58|76.05 65.20 42.96| 80 7 7 7| 0 0|16176.5 9.6258762.1 127.3 8.3 0.5 0.1 98.9| 0 0 0 4160 0| 509349 96.72| 09:05:59|76.05 65.20 42.96| 75 7 9 10| 0 0|16522.0 10.7264274.6 93.1 8.6 0.5 0.1 97.5| 0 0 0 4034 0| 492623 96.51| -------- -----load-avg---- ---cpu-usage--- ---swap--- -------------------------io-usage----------------------- -QPS- -TPS- -Hit%- time | 1m 5m 15m |usr sys idl iow| si so| r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s queue await svctm %util| ins upd del sel iud| lor hit| 09:06:00|76.05 65.20 42.96| 79 7 7 7| 0 0|16369.6 21.2261867.3 262.5 8.4 0.5 0.1 98.9| 0 0 0 4305 0| 494509 96.59| 09:06:01|75.33 65.23 43.09| 73 6 9 12| 0 0|15864.0 209.3253685.4 6238.0 10.0 0.6 0.1 98.7| 0 0 0 3913 0| 483480 96.62| 09:06:02|75.33 65.23 43.09| 73 7 8 12| 0 0|15854.7 12.7253613.2 93.6 11.0 0.7 0.1 99.0| 0 0 0 4271 0| 483771 96.64| 09:06:03|75.33 65.23 43.09| 75 7 9 9| 0 0|16074.8 8.7257104.3 81.7 8.1 0.5 0.1 98.5| 0 0 0 4060 0| 480701 96.55| 09:06:04|75.33 65.23 43.09| 76 7 8 9| 0 0|16221.7 9.7259500.1 139.4 8.1 0.5 0.1 97.6| 0 0 0 3953 0| 486774 96.56| 09:06:05|74.98 65.33 43.24| 78 7 8 8| 0 0|16330.7 8.7261166.5 85.3 8.2 0.5 0.1 98.5| 0 0 0 3957 0| 481775 96.53| 09:06:06|74.98 65.33 43.24| 75 7 9 9| 0 0|16093.7 11.7257436.1 93.7 8.2 0.5 0.1 99.2| 0 0 0 3938 0| 489251 96.60| 09:06:07|74.98 65.33 43.24| 75 7 5 13| 0 0|15758.9 19.2251989.4 188.2 14.7 0.9 0.1 99.7| 0 0 0 4140 0| 494738 96.70| 09:06:08|74.98 65.33 43.24| 69 7 10 15| 0 0|16166.3 8.7258474.9 81.2 8.9 0.5 0.1 98.7| 0 0 0 3993 0| 487162 96.58| 09:06:09|74.98 65.33 43.24| 74 7 9 10| 0 0|16071.0 8.7257010.9 93.3 8.2 0.5 0.1 99.2| 0 0 0 4098 0| 491557 96.61| 09:06:10|70.98 64.66 43.14| 71 7 9 12| 0 0|15549.6 216.1248701.1 6188.7 8.3 0.5 0.1 97.8| 0 0 0 3879 0| 480832 96.66| 09:06:11|70.98 64.66 43.14| 71 7 10 13| 0 0|16233.7 22.4259568.1 257.1 8.2 0.5 0.1 99.2| 0 0 0 4088 0| 493200 96.62| 09:06:12|70.98 64.66 43.14| 78 7 8 7| 0 0|15932.4 10.6254779.5 108.1 8.1 0.5 0.1 98.6| 0 0 0 4168 0| 489838 96.63| 09:06:13|70.98 64.66 43.14| 71 8 9 12| 0 0|16255.9 11.5259902.3 103.9 8.3 0.5 0.1 98.0| 0 0 0 3874 0| 481246 96.52| 09:06:14|70.98 64.66 43.14| 60 6 16 18| 0 0|15621.0 9.7249826.1 81.9 8.0 0.5 0.1 99.3| 0 0 0 3956 0| 480278 96.65|

  Read the article

• Nginx php-fpm high cpu usage

  - by Piotr Kaluza

  I have a problem with a high traffic wordpress, super high CPU load under nginx php-fpm, I am caching with apc, and memcached, spent 2-3 days tweaking configs and looking for answers it seems to me that php-fpm takes up all the cpu available no matter how many max_children i set if i set 5 then the load is 20% each, if i set 20 then the load adds up till 90% i tried static and dynamic server is 2x3.0Ghz 6GB Ram SSD in raid 10 on ubuntu 12.04 x64 utpime: 17:27:51 up 2:19, 1 user, load average: 29.79, 28.08, 26.29 what can be the issue?

  Read the article

• HomeMade/DIY NAS solution

  - by MicTech

  Has anyone experience with building NAS (Network-attached storage) for home/small office using? What component would you recommend? Hardware CPU motherboard HDDs RAID controller etc. Software OS FTP HTTP etc.

  Read the article

• Best use of a RAM disk?

  - by JamesHannah

  Just wondering, have you ever made anything useful with a RAM disk in production? I wonder if the performance benefit they afford possibly outweighs their temporary nature in a specific circumstance. I've only ever used one once, and it wasn't for performance. It was when I needed some writable disk space on a server showing hard drive errors – it gave just enough space for me to install the 3ware RAID utility to identify the dodgy disk. How have you used a RAM disk in production?

  Read the article

• Storage subsystem borking after server restart (all on a Parallel SCSI bus)

  - by Dat Chu

  I have a server (with a SCSI HBA) connected to two Promise VTrak M310p RAID enclosure on the same bus. Everything is working fine until I have to restart my server. Once restarted, the server can no longer communicate with the enclosures: lots of read errors and bus resets. I have to turn off both enclosure, then turn off the server, then turn on the enclosure, then turn on the server for things to work. I don't believe this is the normal behavior, what could I be missing?

  Read the article

• VMWare Esxi Looking for Bottlenecks

  - by nextgenneo

  I have a VMWare ESxi box, 22GB ram, Dual Quad Core Xeon, 2 Sas drives + Write caching raid controller etc. Anyways, have about 30 small XP VM's running on it and starting to get some very slow boot times and other performance issues. I THINK its I/O but looking at the graphs not too sure what to look for. Any ideas on what to look for would be appreciated. Here is the data I've got so far: (I feel like my IO is high but not sure what to bench it against)

  Read the article

• OCZ Vertex 2 not recognized by Ubuntu installer

  - by Zsub

  As I boot into the Ubuntu 10.10 (or 11.04, doesn't matter) live environment or installer, it just refuses to recognise my Vertex 2. It reports the disk as ATA and not supporting smart, shows no serial number, and doesn't list the size correctly. All fdisk tells me is Unable to read /dev/sda (it's the only storage in the PC). I'm now running a temporary install of Windows 7 off of it, which worked like a charm, so where am I going wrong with Ubuntu... Specs: Asus M4N68T-M LE V2 (BIOS 0702, most recent) OCZ Vertex 2 SSD 60 GB Amd Athlon II X4 640 Patriot PSD34G13332 4GB DDR3 ram (two banks) EDIT I installed a second drive, installed Ubuntu on that and booted, it recognised the SSD just fine. I'm now trying to apt-get upgrade the live-environment. I wonder if there is any way to sort of install Ubuntu from Ubuntu (I boot into the working install on the other drive, install it on the SSD and then boot from the SSD). EDIT2 Ok, so that doesn't work. The install detects the SSD, however, it cannot format it. EDIT3 After a fresh boot I can read out SMART-data and even perform a read-benchmark, but if I try to format it, or do a write-bench, it'll crap out and after that it says SMART is not supported. So basically it seems I can't write to the disk, as it will stop working when I do, I will try to run repeated read-benchmarks to see if that has any effect. EDIT4 I'm running several read benchmarks on the drive right now, they give results that are to be expected from an SSD. If the read-benches don't fail, I can use fdisk on the disk, but it is now stuck trying to re-read the partition table after issueing the 'w' command. EDIT5 Parted Magic did recognize the drive and with hdparm -I even could tell me the drive was in a frozen state. I powercycled it (just pull out the plug from the SSD and plug it back in) and it wasn't frozen anymore. After that I could upgrade the firmware on the drive (still using Parted Magic) and format it to Ext4. After I rebooted into the Ubuntu installer, it wouldn't get recognized and hdparm didn't want to talk to it saying HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(identify) failed: Invalid exchange. EDIT6 For some reason if I enable one of the RAID controllers (the one the SSD is connected to, obviously) Ubuntu will let me format it, mount it and write to it. The installer also recognizes it. However if the raid controller is enabled but no array is defined the motherboard can't boot from it :(

  Read the article

• help needed for server hardware configuration

  - by sansknowledge

  hi, basically i am software guy got recently promoted to managerial cadre which requires giving recommendation for server to run software developed by our company , the software is a work flow management and the db is oracle 11 , approximately the size of daily transaction would be around 40 gb, and it should be connected to ~ 150 client machines , the client machine will be growing. help on terms of cpu, processor, memory , rack and stack or raid (i really yet to understand that concept) OS, will be greatly appreciated.

  Read the article

• How do I automate OS installation on 500+ machines?

  - by Igor

  My company has to image a large amount of machines by the end of the year. Each of the machines will have hardware RAID 1 and running CentOS 6. What options do I have for automating the OS installation on these systems? I have a little mini desktop I can set up as an install server, and we can get a switch to create an installation network, but I'm not sure how to go about actually performing the automated installs.

  Read the article

• Dell PowerEdge Server BitLocker Hotswap Hard disks

  - by JoshODBrown

  We have a Windows 2008 R2 Server running on a Dell PowerEdge R310 Server with Bitlocker enabled. There are two physical Hard disks configured as RAID 1. One of the disks recently started having an issue, so we have now have a warranty covered replacement for it, But we were curious if there will be any issues hot swapping the new drive in due to BitLocker being enabled? Has anyone had a similar experience with scenario?

  Read the article

• 2 Servers setup for redundency, backup

  - by minal

  I presently have 1 dedicated virtual server running my website/blog/mail, etc. This is on Hyper-V with 512MB RAM. Windows Web2008. With the VM, I have these running within it: SmarterMail – for emails MS DNS – I have my own nameservers on this server SQL Express IIS7 2 IP Address I have now leased 2 physical servers : P4 2.6Ghz 1GB RAM 80GB HDD. With these new servers, I get 2 IPs per server as well. These are running Windows 2008 Standard. With the VM the HDD was obviously on a RAID setup so I was not worried about hardware issues as it fell on the provider to manage. However, with the new servers the HDD is not RAID’d, hence my concern is that if it fails I need a backup position. What would be the most ideal setup to go for? I am thinking: Server 1: (Web/PrimaryDNS) DNS – NS1 SQL Express – OFF turn on when required, ie. Server2 is down SmarterMail – OFF turn on when required, ie. Server2 is down IIS 7 Server2:(SQL/Backup) DNS – NS2 SQL Web Edition SmarterMail IIS 7 How can I set it up so that if 1 goes down I can have everything on 2 instantly or by manual switching over. I am confused as other DNS servers will cache the web servers IP address for requests, and if that server goes down, the backup server will have a different IP. How do I make this work? I will be doing routine backups, in which case I will keep copies of backups on both servers. If I am copying the same stuff on both servers like a mirror then I am losing on using the true performance out of it. It's like 1 server is always on standby. Ideally I want SQL and web on 2 diff machines for best performance. If Server1 goes down, I should be able to switch to Server2 fairly easily. I don't have a problem with manual intervention to start the sql/mail services, etc. In terms of scalabilty, the VM has coped pretty well to date. Moving forward the SQL and IIS workload is going to double pretty quickly. Some ideas would be great.

  Read the article

• FATA disk performance for VMware

  - by Sergei

  Hi, We are moving to the dataceneter and planning to have tiered storage on EVA4400 - FC RAID 10 for SQL databases and RAID5 across 24 FATA 1TB disks form VMware ESX guests.HP is describing FATA disks as suitable for near online storage, however I am not convinced that 24 spindles will not be enough for running VMWare for 3 ESX servers. Does anyone has opinion on why this could be a such a bad idea?

  Read the article

• Does extra hard drive cache make a difference for streaming video?

  - by johnny

  I am looking at the following two drives for a RAID device, which will be streaming normal things but also a lot of video: Seagate Constellation ES.3 ST4000NM0033 - hard drive - 4 TB - SATA-600 TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Will the 128 MB cache on the Seagate have an effect in my described scenario, compared to the 64 MB on the Toshiba? If so, what sort of difference can I expect? I'm using a qnap device, if that matters.

  Read the article

• Lefthand SAN questions.

  - by Gk

  I'm curious about Lefthand SAN solutions from HP. People from Dell have told me that Lefthand SAN's require at least two nodes and data must be mirroring between them so capacity is a half less compare to other SAN technology (e.g.Equal Logic). Is it true? Can a HP lefhand SAN be used as a stand-alone storage server with full RAID function (1, 10, 5)? TIA, -giobuon

  Read the article

• I/O intensive MySql server on Amazon AWS

  - by rhossi

  We recently moved from a traditional Data Center to cloud computing on AWS. We are developing a product in partnership with another company, and we need to create a database server for the product we'll release. I have been using Amazon Web Services for the past 3 years, but this is the first time I received a spec with this very specific hardware configuration. I know there are trade-offs and that real hardware will always be faster than virtual machines, and knowing that fact forehand, what would you recommend? 1) Amazon EC2? 2) Amazon RDS? 3) Something else? 4) Forget it baby, stick to the real hardware Here is the hardware requirements This server will be focused on I/O and MySQL for the statistics, memory size and disk space for the images hosting. Server 1 I/O The very main part on this server will be I/O processing, FusionIO cards have proven themselves extremely efficient, this is currently the best you can have in this domain. o Fusion ioDrive2 MLC 365GB (http://www.fusionio.com/load/-media-/1m66wu/docsLibrary/FIO_ioDrive2_Datasheet.pdf) CPU MySQL will use less CPU cores than Apache but it will use them very hard, the E7 family has 30M Cache L3 wichi provide boost performance : o 1x Intel E7-2870 will be ok. Storage SAS will be good enough in terms of performance, especially considering the space required. o RAID 10 of 4 x SAS 10k or 15k for a total available space of 512 GB. Memory o 64 GB minimum is required on this server considering the size of the statistics database. Warning: the statistics database will grow quickly, if possible consider starting with 128 GB directly, it will help. This server will be focused on I/O and MySQL for the statistics, memory size and disk space for the images hosting. Server 2 I/O The very main part on this server will be I/O processing, FusionIO cards have proven themselves extremely efficient, this is currently the best you can have in this domain. o Fusion ioDrive2 MLC 365GB (http://www.fusionio.com/load/-media-/1m66wu/docsLibrary/FIO_ioDrive2_Datasheet.pdf) CPU MySQL will use less CPU cores than Apache but it will use them very hard, the E7 family has 30M Cache L3 wichi provide boost performance : o 1x Intel E7-2870 will be ok. Storage SAS will be good enough in terms of performance, especially considering the space required. o RAID 10 of 4 x SAS 10k or 15k for a total available space of 512 GB. Memory o 64 GB minimum is required on this server considering the size of the statistics database. Warning: the statistics database will grow quickly, if possible consider starting with 128 GB directly, it will help. Thanks in advance. Best,

  Read the article

• Safer RAID5 rebuilds using partially failed disks?

  - by arcticmac

  There have been lots of articles posted recently about how RAID5 is dangerous because of long resilver times, and in particular because of increasing chances of encountering a URE during the resilver. Obviously this is a significant concern. However, it seems that in many cases of interest (as long as you're keeping some kind of eye on your disks), when it comes time to rebuild the array, the disk that I'm replacing is still mostly readable. If you try to explain this predicament to the average layperson, they are typically very confused as to why you have two almost completely functional disks but can't produce one working array. It seems to me that there ought to be some way to take advantage of this to make rebuilds safer, as long as I'm willing to have the RAID5 be read-only for a couple of days while it rebuilds. Conceptually, what I have in mind looks something like this: When a disk fails, immediately take the RAID5 offline or mount it read-only Attach a new disk (either in a spare bay, or externally via eSATA) and begin rebuilding it to replace the failed one. If known, perhaps start with the stripes in which the failure occurred, to minimize the chances of losing those if another disk fails. In the event that a second disk experiences a URE or other failure during the rebuild, try to source that data from the disk that is being replaced. Presumably if this happens, more rebuilding would be necessary. When complete, shut down the server, swap the replacement drive into the original bay if desired, and bring the array back up. Obviously such a process would not be appropriate for applications where uptime is critical or data loss cannot be tolerated, but it seems to me that this could help considerably to improve the reliability of RAID5. I assume that there's not a good way to implement a recovery like this at present, given that I haven't seen any indication of tools that are designed to do this, and that it seems like it would be rather obtuse to work out manually. Are there also technical issues with it that I haven't thought of (I'm still fairly new to RAID stuff)? Any thoughts on how hard something like this would be to implement (e.g. in linux md raid)?

  Read the article

• What PSU would be needed for a mid-range computer?

  - by iconiK

  I am building a mid-range computer primarily for gaming and graphic design. With the following components, what power supply unit would be good, in terms of having ample power for future expansion, with good efficiency and quiet operation, but most important, reliability in the long (5+ years) run? Gigabyt GA-H67MA-UD2H LGA 1155 Intel Core i5 2300 2.8GHz Crucial CT2KIT51264BA1339 2x4GB Kit ASUS HD 6850 DirectCU Intel X25-V 40GB SSD 2xSeagate 7200.12 1TB HDD RAID 1 Antec NSK-3480 µATX Case

  Read the article

• Windows server 2008 R2 error :The page file is to small to complete the action

  - by kishore

  I have a windows server 2008 R2 standard edition. The system suddenly stopped accepting remote desktop connections. When I tried to connect directly to the console, I am unable to start any applications. I got errors "The page file is to small to complete the action". Under takmanager in performance the system shows "Commit(GB) 127/127". What does this imply? The system has 32 GB ram, 5 raid disks each 150 Gb

  Read the article

• Would a Drobo benefit from TLER (Western Digital) or ERC (Seagate)?

  - by David Rubin

  Since Drobo's so-called "BeyondRAID" is analogous to a custom RAID 5 implementation, will using a drive with Time-Limited Error Recovery features enabled be of benefit to the Drobo array? I haven't been able to find any information in the Drobo knowledgebase.

  Read the article

• Hypervisor load on local disks

  - by Chris

  Hi, What is the I/O load on the local disk system for the host OS in XenServer ? I can't find this info anywhere. As we have a SAN for the VMs themselves, can we get away with cheap controller / SATA disk in raid-1 for the hypervisor ? We won't boot from the SAN as it seems prone to problems. Thanks, Chris

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61  | Next Page >