Search Results

Search found 1798 results on 72 pages for 'incoming'.

Page 55/72 | < Previous Page | 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 | Next Page >

QMail do not delivery to remote mailboxes for my own domain

- by lorenzo-s

Sorry for the title, I don't know how to sum up this situation. I have a web server at mydomain.com, running qmail for website related mail delivery (i.e. newsletter, sign up confirmation, etc). qmail here is used only to send mails, because I have a fully working Google App Gmail associated with mydomain.com for normal email receiving. qmail runs fine when sending email to remote addresses, for example to [email protected], but fails when sending to [email protected]. I think it's because the server thinks that he have to manage mailboxes for mydomain.com locally, instead of redirect them to Gmail. Here is the /var/log/qmail/current for two email: the first one is sent without problems to example.com, second one fails because it's for mydomain.com: 2012-11-15 15:04:11.551933500 new msg 262580 2012-11-15 15:04:11.551936500 info msg 262580: bytes 5604 from <[email protected]> qp 5185 uid 33 2012-11-15 15:04:11.575910500 starting delivery 316: msg 262580 to remote [email protected] 2012-11-15 15:04:11.575912500 status: local 0/10 remote 1/20 2012-11-15 15:04:12.189828500 delivery 316: success: 74.125.136.27_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.0.0_OK_1352991894_j49si13055539eep.9/ 2012-11-15 15:04:12.189830500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 2012-11-15 15:04:12.189831500 end msg 262580 2012-11-15 16:49:20.270332500 new msg 262580 2012-11-15 16:49:20.270336500 info msg 262580: bytes 2192 from <[email protected]> qp 5479 uid 33 2012-11-15 16:49:20.315125500 starting delivery 323: msg 262580 to local [email protected] 2012-11-15 16:49:20.315128500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 2012-11-15 16:49:20.320855500 delivery 323: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/ 2012-11-15 16:49:20.320858500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 2012-11-15 16:49:20.372911500 bounce msg 262580 qp 5484 2012-11-15 16:49:20.372914500 end msg 262580 As you can see, it says: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name I can't say he's wrong :) How to solve this? How to let Google App Gmail manage incoming email for mydomain.com for messages sent by mydomain.com qmail server?

Read the article
Ubuntu 12.04 open port 80 inside WLAN

- by Eduard

I have an nginx server running on ubuntu 12.04 that serves http through port 80 and https through port 443. Everything works fine if I access it from the same computer via localhost, 127.0.0.1 or the local IP 192.168.0.11. If I try to access the server from another computer in the same VLAN it does not work for http; it works for https. I have changed my nginx configuration to also listen to port 8000 for http; I can then access http from the other computer in the same VLAN via "http://192.168.0.11:8000". I also have a web server running on port 80 on a windows machine and can access it from another device in the same VLAN, therefore the router is not blocking incoming http traffic. The nginx process is run by root. I have used tcpdump and I see that packets are arriving to Ubuntu: 192.168.0.16.49735 192.168.0.11.80 and that some response is being given 192.168.0.11.80 192.168.0.16.49735 (I do not know what the response is though). There is no request arriving at the nginx web server (I have checked the access log). I have iptables empty. I have unsuccessfully tried to find a solution for a long time to this, it has now become a matter of happiness or bitterness :).

Read the article
Manual NAT on Checkpoint (Redirect all http requests to a local web server)

- by B. Kulakli

We have a proxy server in our internal network and I want to redirect all internet http requests to a web server in local network. It'll be like a Network Billboard that says "No direct connection is available. Set up your proxy etc." For example: A user starts the computer Opens the browser Tries to open www.google.com Should see web server output on local network Tries another web site on internet Should see web server output on local network Sets up proxy Tries to connect to a web site Web site should be loaded I have added a simple manual NAT rule to address translation in Checkpoint firewall but it simply does not work. Here is my address translation rule Source Destination Service T.Source T.Destination T.Service MY_PC A_GOOGLE_IP ALL ORIGINAL INT_WEB_SRV ORIGINAL Then when I ping A_GOOGLE_IP, replies come from INT_WEB_SRV, as I expected. However, when I try to connect A_GOOGLE_IP from browser (http://A_GOOGLE_IP), no replies come from SYN_SENT and falls into timeout. When I look at the firewall log of INT_WEB_SRV, I can see the incoming connection requests from MY_PC is accepted and NO denies. By the way, there is no problem to see INT_WEB_SRV (http://INT_WEB_SRV) from browser. My understanding is, my NAT rule at checkpoint NGX R60 does not include return packets. I definitely need some help.

Read the article
how to block spam email using Microsoft Outlook 2011 (Mac)?

- by tim8691

I'm using Microsoft Outlook 2011 for Mac and I'm getting so much spam I'm not sure how to control it. In the past, I always applied "Block Sender" and "Mark as Junk" to any spam email messages I received. This doesn't seem to be enough nowadays. Then I've started using Tools Rules to create rules based on subject, but the same spammer keeps changing subject lines, so this isn't working. I've been tracking the IP addresses they also seem to be changing with each email. Is there any key information I can use in the email to apply a rule to successfully place these spam emails in the junk folder? I'm using a "Low" level of junk email protection. The next higher level, "high", says it may eliminate valid emails, so I prefer not to use this option. There's maybe one or two spammers sending me emails, but the volume is very high now. I'm getting a variation of the following facebook email spam: Hi, Here's some activity you have missed. No matter how far away you are from friends and family, we can help you stay connected. Other people have asked to be your friend. Accept this invitation to see your previous friend requests Some variations on the subject line they've used include: Account Info Change Account Sender Mail Pending ticket notification Pending ticket status Support Center Support med center Pending Notification Reminder: Pending Notification How do people address this? Can it be done within Outlook or is it better to get a third party commercial software to plug-in or otherwise manage it? If so, why would the third party be better than Outlook's internal tools (e.g. what does it look for in the incoming email that Outlook doesn't look at)?

Read the article
Looking for ballpark pricing on an affordable a Cisco VOIP solution for our office

- by guytech

We have about 8 incoming PSTN lines that are currently on an old and antiquated Nortel Meridian ICS system. This system has been giving us some grief. We're looking for a new VOIP solution. I've been looking at a Cisco solution and it does seem pricey but I'm sure effective. Unfortunately, we probably can't afford a Cisco Unified Communications 520 which seems to be the ideal solution. We have about 15 people who need an extension and voicemail. We really don't have any need for a fancy system just an auto attendant of some sort when people call us. It looks like we'll have to get an older router and an addon card for what we're looking for to get best value pricing. However, I don't know a a lot about Cisco voice products so I'm a bit lost as to what to get. The only thing I am sure on is the pricing on VOIP phones which we expect to be about ~$100-200. However, I'm not sure what pieces of VOIP infrastructure to get. Any advice? I am familiar with Asterisk but right now I'm looking on pricing concerning a Cisco solution.

Read the article
Building an Email server for mass emails

- by EGHDK

I recently started doing IT odd jobs for a company. The company has a pretty decent sized mail list that costs them over $3000 per month to send out email from. The company is set on creating their own email server so that it can just run and send emails to the client lists. They only send out emails roughly once a month. Has anyone had experience with this? This wouldn't be an email server I guess (as it doesn't need to handle incoming messages) It just has to be able to send around 200,000 emails, once a month. What would be the best way to go about this? Services online like MailChimp have proved to be too pricey. It's not an ad that is being sent out, it's more of a monthly newsletter, so we don't need any crazy software for ROI or anything crazy like that. If I could fit 200,000 people in GMAIL, I'd do it, but I don't think I can (heh... maybe I should try).

Read the article
How could one archive all emails sent from employees?

- by Schnapple

My client runs a small business. This business has a small number of employees. They are currently hosted through GoDaddy for web and email. For legal reasons the client would like to archive emails sent by their employees. Currently the emails are all done through POP3 so all the email is basically housed in files on individual machines (remember, small business). It's been proposed an inexpensive solution to this would be to have all emails BCC'd to a main account so that conversations with the outside would could be archived and tracked. I have not investigated it myself personally but apparently GoDaddy can do something along these lines for all incoming email but not for outgoing email. Is there a way to set up email accounts for a particular domain to where a specified admin user could be copied on all outgoing email? UPDATE: I've modified the title to reflect employees not users. The goal of this is to archive sent emails for legal reasons. This is something the employees will be cognizant of and on board with. The bottom line here is to basically emulate a feature of a larger-class platform through a smaller, cheaper platform. If the answer is "can't do it, buy an Exchange license" that's fine. My apologies for phrasing this so poorly. I understand why there was so much confusion.

Read the article
fwbuilder/iptables manually scripted + autogenerated rules at startup?

- by Jakobud

Fedora 11 Our previous IT-guy setup iptable rules on our firewall in a way that is confusing me and he didn't document any of it. I was hoping someone could help me make some sense of it. The iptables service is obviously starting at startup, but the /etc/sysconfig/iptables file was untouched (default values). I found in /etc/rc.local he was doing this: # We have multiple ISP connections on our network. # The following is about 50+ rules to route incoming and outgoing # information. For example, certain internal hosts are specified here # to use ISP A connection while everyone else on the network uses # ISP B connection when access the internet. ip rule add from 99.99.99.99 table Whatever_0 ip rule add from 99.99.99.98 table Whatever_0 ip rule add from 99.99.99.97 table Whatever_0 ip rule add from 99.99.99.96 table Whatever_0 ip rule add from 99.99.99.95 table Whatever_0 ip rule add from 192.168.1.103 table ISB_A ip rule add from 192.168.1.105 table ISB_A ip route add 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 table ISB_B # etc... and then near the end of the file, AFTER all the ip rules he just declared, he has this: /root/fw/firewall-rules.fw He's executing the firewall rules file that was auto-generated by fwbuilder. Some questions Why is he declaring all these ip rules in rc.local instead of declaring them in fwbuilder like all the other rules? Any advantage or necessity to this? Or is this just a poorly organized way to implement firewall rules? Why is he declaring ip rules BEFORE executing the fwbuilder script? I would assume that one of the first things the fwbuilder script does it get rid of any existing rules before declaring all the new ones. Am I wrong about this? If that was the case, the fwbuilder script would basically just delete all the ip rules that were defined in rc.local. Does this make any sense? Why is he executing all this stuff at startup in rc.local instead of just using iptables-save to keep the firewall settings at /etc/sysconfig/iptables that will get implemented at runtime?

Read the article
Building an Email server for mass emails

- by EGHDK

I recently started doing IT odd jobs for a company. The company has a pretty decent sized mail list that costs them over $3000 per month to send out email from. The company is set on creating their own email server so that it can just run and send emails to the client lists. They only send out emails roughly once a month. Has anyone had experience with this? This wouldn't be an email server I guess (as it doesn't need to handle incoming messages) It just has to be able to send around 200,000 emails, once a month. What would be the best way to go about this? Services online like MailChimp have proved to be too pricey. It's not an ad that is being sent out, it's more of a monthly newsletter, so we don't need any crazy software for ROI or anything crazy like that. If I could fit 200,000 people in GMAIL, I'd do it, but I don't think I can (heh... maybe I should try).

Read the article
Manual NAT on Checkpoint (Redirect all http requests to a local web server)

- by kulakli

Hi, We have a proxy server in internal network and I want to redirect all internet http requests to a web server in local network. It'll be like a Network Billboard that say "No direct connection is available. Set up your proxy etc." For example: A user starts the computer Opens the browser Trys to open www.google.com Should see web server output on local network Trys another web site on internet Should see web server output on local network Sets up proxy Trys to connect to a web site Web site should be loaded I have added a simple manual NAT rule to address translation in Checkpoint firewall but it simply does not work. Here is my address translation rule Source Destination Service T.Source T.Destination T.Service MY_PC A_GOOGLE_IP ALL ORIGINAL INT_WEB_SRV ORIGINAL Then when I ping A_GOOGLE_IP, replies come from INT_WEB_SRV, as I expected. However, when I try to connect A_GOOGLE_IP from browser (http://A_GOOGLE_IP), No replies come from SYN_SENT and falls into timeout. When I look at the firewall log of INT_WEB_SRV, I can see the incoming connection requests from MY_PC is accepted and NO denies. By the way, there is no problem to see INT_WEB_SRV (http://INT_WEB_SRV) from browser. My understanding is, my nat rule at checkpoint NGX R60 does not include return packets. I definitely need some help. Regards, Burak

Read the article
How could one track all emails sent from employees?

- by Schnapple

My client runs a small business. This business has a small number of employees. For various reasons, my client would like to be able to have a copy of all of the emails sent from their employees BCC'd to them. The net effect here would be similar to the access they would have if they hosted their email through Exchange but the business is too small to make this a feasible option. They are currently hosted through GoDaddy. I have not investigated it myself personally but apparently GoDaddy can do something along these lines for all incoming email but not for outgoing email. Is there a way to set up email accounts for a particular domain to where a specified admin user could be copied on all outgoing email? UPDATE: I've modified the title to reflect that it's employees not just users who are the goal here. Also I forgot to mention how they currently do email through GoDaddy - POP3. I think maybe IMAP is also possible through GoDaddy, not sure. And yes, the bottom line here is to basically emulate a feature of a larger-class platform through a smaller, cheaper platform. Opinion-only answers should probably be relegated to the comments. For the sake of argument let's say that any legal requirements have been met.

Read the article
High speed network configuration

- by Peter M

Sorry if this seems to be a stupid question, I'm not sure how to specify what I want to know when checking google. I will have 2 or 3 devices pumping out data on a 100Base-T port. The combined data rate of all devices is about 15KB/S which exceeds the optimal 100Base-T channel capacity (12KB/S), but well within the realms of a 1000Base-T connection. Each device will be sending a burst of data in the form of an FTP transfer to a common, single host computer in a sequential manner ie: Device A establishes FTP connection and transfers data Device B establishes FTP connection and transfers data Device C establishes FTP connection and transfers data It may be that the A&B, B&C and C&A transfers overlap in the time domain to some extent. There will be minimal traffic going back from the computer to each device (in general what ever is needed to support the FTP transfers), and the network will be dedicated to transferring data between these devices and the host computer. Is it possible to use a switch to combine the multiple incoming 100Base-T streams into a single outgoing 1000Base-T stream? if so what features in a switch should I be looking for? Or would it be better to have 3 physical point-to-point 100Base-T dedicated connections between each device and the host computer? (thus having at least 3 physical Ethernet interfaces on that computer) Note that I can't change the interface on the devices, but I am free to choose the network and host computer configuration. Thanks for you help Peter

Read the article
How to install ia32-libs on Wheezy?

- by javano

I have seen a couple of questions on ServerFault relating to installing ia32-libs on a 64bit machine but the solutions aren't working for me (I don't think any of these questions where for Wheezy specifically I'm not sure how to proceed); root@server:/home/# apt-get install -f ia32-libs Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: ia32-libs : Depends: ia32-libs-i386 php5 : Depends: libapache2-mod-php5 (>= 5.4.4-14+deb7u2) but it is not going to be installed or libapache2-mod-php5filter (>= 5.4.4-14+deb7u2) but it is not going to be installed or php5-cgi (>= 5.4.4-14+deb7u2) but it is not going to be installed or php5-fpm (>= 5.4.4-14+deb7u2) but it is not going to be installed php5-mysql : Depends: phpapi-20100525 E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages. root@server:/home/# sudo apt-get install ia32-libs-i386 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: ia32-libs-i386:i386 : Depends: freeglut3:i386 (>= 2.6.0-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: lesstif2:i386 (>= 1:0.95.2-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libacl1:i386 (>= 2.2.49-4) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libasyncns0:i386 (>= 0.3-1.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libattr1:i386 (>= 1:2.4.44-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libaudio2:i386 (>= 1.9.2-4) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libaudiofile1:i386 (>= 0.2.6-8) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libavahi-client3:i386 (>= 0.6.27-2+squeeze1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libavahi-common3:i386 (>= 0.6.27-2+squeeze1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libbsd0:i386 (>= 0.2.0-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libcap2:i386 (>= 1:2.19-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libcomerr2:i386 (>= 1.41.12-4stable1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libcups2:i386 (>= 1.4.4-7+squeeze1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libcurl3:i386 (>= 7.21.0-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libdbus-1-3:i386 (>= 1.2.24-4+squeeze1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libdirectfb-1.2-9:i386 (>= 1.2.10.0-4) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libdrm-intel1:i386 (>= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libdrm-radeon1:i386 (>= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libdrm2:i386 (>= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libedit2:i386 (>= 2.11-20080614-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libesd0:i386 (>= 0.2.41-8) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libexif12:i386 (>= 0.6.19-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libexpat1:i386 (>= 2.0.1-7) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libflac8:i386 (>= 1.2.1-2+b1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libfltk1.1:i386 (>= 1.1.10-2+b1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libfontconfig1:i386 (>= 2.8.0-2.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libfreetype6:i386 (>= 2.4.2-2.1+squeeze3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgcrypt11:i386 (>= 1.4.5-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgdbm3:i386 (>= 1.8.3-9) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgl1-mesa-dri:i386 (>= 7.7.1-5) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgl1-mesa-glx:i386 (>= 7.7.1-5) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libglu1-mesa:i386 (>= 7.7.1-5) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgnutls26:i386 (>= 2.8.6-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgpg-error0:i386 (>= 1.6-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgphoto2-2:i386 (>= 2.4.6-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgphoto2-port0:i386 (>= 2.4.6-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgssapi-krb5-2:i386 (>= 1.8.3+dfsg-4squeeze2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libice6:i386 (>= 2:1.0.6-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libidn11:i386 (>= 1.15-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libieee1284-3:i386 (>= 0.2.11-6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libjack-jackd2-0:i386 (>= 1.9.5~dfsg-14) but it is not going to be installed or libjack0:i386 (>= 1:0.118+svn3796-7) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libjpeg62:i386 (>= 6b1-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libjpeg8:i386 (>= 8b-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libk5crypto3:i386 (>= 1.8.3+dfsg-4squeeze2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libkeyutils1:i386 (>= 1.4-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libkrb5-3:i386 (>= 1.8.3+dfsg-4squeeze2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libkrb5support0:i386 (>= 1.8.3+dfsg-4squeeze2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: liblcms1:i386 (>= 1.18.dfsg-1.2+b3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libltdl7:i386 (>= 2.2.6b-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: liblzo2-2:i386 (>= 2.03-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmpg123-0:i386 (>= 1.12.1-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libnspr4-0d:i386 (>= 4.8.6-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libnss3-1d:i386 (>= 3.12.8-1+squeeze4) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libogg0:i386 (>= 1.2.0~dfsg-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libopenal1:i386 (>= 1:1.12.854-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libpam0g:i386 (>= 1.1.1-6.1+squeeze1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libpng12-0:i386 (>= 1.2.44-1+squeeze1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libpopt0:i386 (>= 1.16-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libpulse0:i386 (>= 0.9.21-3+squeeze1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libsamplerate0:i386 (>= 0.1.7-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libsane:i386 (>= 1.0.21-9) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libsasl2-2:i386 (>= 2.1.23.dfsg1-7) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libsdl1.2debian:i386 (>= 1.2.15) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libselinux1:i386 (>= 2.0.96-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libsigc++-2.0-0c2a:i386 (>= 2.2.4.2-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libsm6:i386 (>= 2:1.1.1-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libsndfile1:i386 (>= 1.0.21-3+squeeze1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libsqlite3-0:i386 (>= 3.7.3-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libssh2-1:i386 (>= 1.2.6-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libssl1.0.0:i386 (>= 1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libstdc++5:i386 (>= 1:3.3.6-20) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libsvga1:i386 (>= 1:1.4.3-29) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libsysfs2:i386 (>= 2.1.0+repack-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libtasn1-3:i386 (>= 2.7-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libtdb1:i386 (>= 1.2.1-2+b1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libtiff4:i386 (>= 3.9.4-5+squeeze3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libts-0.0-0:i386 (>= 1.0-7) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libusb-0.1-4:i386 (>= 2:0.1.12-16) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libuuid1:i386 (>= 2.17.2-9) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libvorbis0a:i386 (>= 1.3.1-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libvorbisenc2:i386 (>= 1.3.1-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libvorbisfile3:i386 (>= 1.3.1-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libwrap0:i386 (>= 7.6.q-19) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libx11-6:i386 (>= 2:1.3.3-4) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libx86-1:i386 (>= 1.1+ds1-6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxau6:i386 (>= 1:1.0.6-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxaw7:i386 (>= 2:1.0.7-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxcb-render-util0:i386 (>= 0.3.6-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxcb-render0:i386 (>= 1.6-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxcb1:i386 (>= 1.6-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxcomposite1:i386 (>= 1:0.4.2-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxcursor1:i386 (>= 1:1.1.10-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxdamage1:i386 (>= 1:1.1.3-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxdmcp6:i386 (>= 1:1.0.3-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxext6:i386 (>= 2:1.1.2-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxfixes3:i386 (>= 1:4.0.5-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxft2:i386 (>= 2.1.14-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxi6:i386 (>= 2:1.3-6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxinerama1:i386 (>= 2:1.1-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxml2:i386 (>= 2.7.8.dfsg-2+squeeze1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxmu6:i386 (>= 2:1.0.5-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxmuu1:i386 (>= 2:1.0.5-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxp6:i386 (>= 1:1.0.0.xsf1-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxpm4:i386 (>= 1:3.5.8-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxrandr2:i386 (>= 2:1.3.0-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxrender1:i386 (>= 1:0.9.6-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxslt1.1:i386 (>= 1.1.26-6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxss1:i386 (>= 1:1.2.0-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxt6:i386 (>= 1:1.0.7-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxtst6:i386 (>= 2:1.1.0-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxv1:i386 (>= 2:1.0.5-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libxxf86vm1:i386 (>= 1:1.1.0-2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: odbcinst1debian2:i386 (>= 2.2.14p2-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libodbc1:i386 but it is not going to be installed Depends: xaw3dg:i386 (>= 1.5+E-18) but it is not going to be installed php5 : Depends: libapache2-mod-php5 (>= 5.4.4-14+deb7u2) but it is not going to be installed or libapache2-mod-php5filter (>= 5.4.4-14+deb7u2) but it is not going to be installed or php5-cgi (>= 5.4.4-14+deb7u2) but it is not going to be installed or php5-fpm (>= 5.4.4-14+deb7u2) but it is not going to be installed php5-mysql : Depends: phpapi-20100525 E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages. root@server:/home/# dpkg --print-architecture amd64 root@server:/home/# dpkg --print-foreign-architectures i386 root@server:/home/# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 7.1 (wheezy) Release: 7.1 Codename: wheezy root@server:/home/# uname -a Linux servername 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.46-1 x86_64 GNU/Linux root@server:/home/# cat /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free

Read the article
Thomson router reboots unexpectedly with an apparent remote connection attempt

- by ChrisF

I've got a weird problem. Every so often my rooter (a Thomson TG585 v8 running version 8.2.7.8 of it's firmware) reboots itself. It seems to be associated with this message in the event log: FIREWALL replay check (1 of 2): Protocol: ICMP Src ip: 183.178.144.177 Dst ip: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Type: Destination Unreachable Code: Host Unreacheable xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is my external IP address 183.178.144.177 resolves to 183178144177.ctinets.com We've got a student from Hong Kong staying with us at the moment and the reboots seem coincidental with him starting up his laptop. I say this because a check on ctinets.com shows it to be based in Hong Kong, though our guest's laptop doesn't appear to have any software related to this company installed. I say "apparently" as he is running the Chinese version of Windows and his English doesn't cover technical subjects like this. I know this is an incoming message but I was assuming that it was in response to something on the student's laptop which is why the first thought was malware, but we've got anti virus on all the other machines and have run malwarebytes on his with a negative result so I don't think the problem is due to a virus or (known) trojan. What else can I do to stop this and identify the cause?

Read the article
Postgresql connection refused

- by Jonathan

I'm trying to remotely connect to my postgresql database. I have two virtual machines set up both running ubuntu 14.04. I am trying to connect to the second vm using the first vm using psql -h 10.0.1.23 -U postgres -d postgres But I receive the error: Could not connect to server: Connection refused Is the server running on host "10.0.1.23" and accepting TCP/IP connections on port 5432? I have changed the pg_hba.conf and added host all all 10.0.1.64/24 md5 host all all * md5 host all all 0.0.0.0/0 md5 And changed the postgresql.conf listen_address=" * " In an attempt to allow all incoming connections. I have also tried to change the firewall settings, but I am unsure of whether or not the ports are properly listening for the connection. Edit: Output of netstat -an | grep -E '^tcp[^6].*LISTEN' tcp 0 0 127.0.1.1:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:23 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5432 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN

Read the article
Moving Microsoft Exchange server to the private network.

- by Alexey Shatygin

In one of the offices, we have a 50-computers network, which had only one server machine: Windows 2003 Server Microsoft ISA Server Microsoft Exchange 2003 This server worked as a gateway (proxy server), mail server, file server, firewall and domain controller. It had two network interfaces, one for WAN (let's say 222.222.222.222) and one for LAN (192.168.1.1). I set up a Linux box to be the gateway (without a proxy), so the Linux box now has the following interfaces: 222.222.222.222 (our external IP, we removed it from the Windows machine) and 192.168.1.100 (internal IP), but we need to keep the old Windows server as a mail server and a proxy for some of our users, until we prepare another Linux machine for that, so I need the mail server on that machine to be available from the Internet. I set up iptables rules to redirect all the incoming connections on the 25th and 110th ports of our external IP to 192.168.1.1:25 and 192.168.1.1:110 and when I try to telnet our SMTP service telnet 222.222.222.222 25 I get the greetings from our windows server's (192.168.1.1) SMTP service, and that's works fine. But when I telnet POP3 service telnet 222.222.222.222 110 I only get the blank black screen and the connection seem to disappear if I press any button. I've checked the ISA rules - everything seems to be the same for 110th and 25th ports. When I telnet on 110th ports of our Windows server from our new gateway machine like this: telnet 192.168.1.1 110 I get the acces to it's POP3 service: +OK Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 POP3 server version 6.5.7638.1 (...) ready. What sould I do, to make the POP3 service available through our new gateway?

Read the article
Routing for remote gateway over VPN in Vista/7 broken?

- by Raymond

Hi, Situation is as follows. Home computer running Windows 7, sets up VPN connection (LT2P + IPSec, "use remote gateway" disabled) to office. Subnet is 192.168.64.x Office has Draytek Vigor 2920 router, subnet is 192.168.32.x What happens? - VPN connection itself works fine - Can ping any machine on the remote network - When trying to open a webpage from a host in the remote network, the remote server logs the incoming request, but the browser hangs on "waiting for..." and eventually times out. I have observed this problem on Windows Vista and Windows 7. On Windows XP however there is no problem like described above. The only clue I have is that there is a difference in the routing between XP and Vista/7. The output of "route print" on Windows XP looks like this: (See www.latunyi.com/routing_xp.png) So here the gateway for the 192.168.32.x subnet is the IP address that the local computer has in the remote network. The output of "route print" on Windows 7 (and Windows Vista) looks like this: (See www.latunyi.com/routing_win7.png") Now the gateway for the 192.168.32.x subnet is the IP address of the VPN router (32.1). I don't know if that causes this trouble, but it seems a bit strange. Enabling "use default gateway on remote network" doesn't make a difference. Using the new option "Disable class based route addition" in Windows 7 only makes the route to the VPN router disappear. I am really puzzled here. I assume the VPN routing can't be broken in both Vista and Windows 7, and this should just work without manually adding routes. I hope someone has a solution for this problem :-). Thanks!

Read the article
Route return traffic to correct gateway depending on service

- by Marnix van Valen

On my office network I have two internet connections and one CentOS server running a website (HTTPS on port 443). The website should be publicly accessible through the public IP of the first internet connection (ISP-1). The other internet connection, ISP-2, id the default gateway on the network. Both internet connections have routers (the household-kind) with NAT, SPI firewalls etc. The router on ISP-2 is a Netgear WNDR3700 (aka N600) with original firmware. The problem is that the website is unreachable. Looks like incoming traffic on ISP-1 will reach the server but the returning traffic is routed through ISP-2, effectively making the site unreachable. As far as I can tell I can't do port based routing on the WNDR3700. What are my options to make this work? I've been looking at implementing an iptables / routing based solution on the server itself but haven't been able to make that work. Update: Note that the server has one network interface connecting it to both routers.

Read the article
Hadoop streaming job on EC2 stays in "pending" state

- by liamf

Trying to experiment with Hadoop and Streaming using cloudera distribution CDH3 on Ubuntu. Have valid data in hdfs:// ready for processing. Wrote little streaming mapper in python. When I launch a mapper only job using: hadoop jar /usr/lib/hadoop/contrib/streaming/hadoop-streaming*.jar -file /usr/src/mystuff/mapper.py -mapper /usr/src/mystuff/mapper.py -input /incoming/STBFlow/* -output testOP hadoop duly decides it will use 66 mappers on the cluster to process the data. The testOP directory is created on HDFS. A job_conf.xml file is created. But the job tracker UI at port 50030 never shows the job moving out of "pending" state and nothing else happens. CPU usage stays at zero. (the job is created though) If I give it a single file (instead of the entire directory) as input, same result (except Hadoop decides it needs 2 mappers instead of 66). I also tried using the "dumbo" Python utility and launching jobs using that: same result: permanently pending. So I am missing something basic: could someone help me out with what I should look for? The cluster is on Amazon EC2. Firewall issues maybe: ports are enabled explicitly, case by case, in the cluster security group.

Read the article
Email delivering but not receiving from Gmail

- by Karthik Malla

Host Record type Value 65.75.241.26 / 24 PTR softmail.me. accs.softmail.me. A 65.75.241.26 beta.softmail.me. A 65.75.241.26 ftp.softmail.me. CNAME softmail.me. lists.softmail.me. CNAME softmail.me. mail.softmail.me. A 65.75.241.26 mssql.softmail.me. A 65.75.241.26 ns.softmail.me. A 65.75.241.26 sitebuilder.softmail.me. A 65.75.241.26 softmail.me. NS ns.softmail.me. softmail.me. A 65.75.241.26 softmail.me. MX (10) mail.softmail.me. test.softmail.me. A 65.75.241.26 webmail.softmail.me. A 65.75.241.26 www.accs.softmail.me. CNAME accs.softmail.me. www.beta.softmail.me. CNAME beta.softmail.me. www.softmail.me. CNAME softmail.me. www.test.softmail.me. CNAME test.softmail.me. The above are the DNS settings of my email server and mail incoming/outgoing is done by softmail.me:25/110 using which I am able to send emails but unable to receive. Can anyone tell me where the problem lies at?

Read the article
Can I use iptables on my Varnish server to forward HTTPS traffic to a specific server?

- by Dylan Beattie

We use Varnish as our front-end web cache and load balancer, so we have a Linux server in our development environment, running Varnish with some basic caching and load-balancing rules across a pair of Windows 2008 IIS web servers. We have a wildcard DNS rule that points *.development at this Varnish box, so we can browse http://www.mysite.com.development, http://www.othersite.com.development, etc. The problem is that since Varnish can't handle HTTPS traffic, we can't access https://www.mysite.com.development/ For dev/testing, we don't need any acceleration or load-balancing - all I need is to tell this box to act as a dumb proxy and forward any incoming requests on port 443 to a specific IIS server. I suspect iptables may offer a solution but it's been a long while since I wrote an iptables rule. Some initial hacking has got me as far as iptables -F iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --sport 443 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 443 -j DNAT --to 10.0.0.241:443 iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p tcp -d 10.0.0.241 --dport 443 -j MASQUERADE iptables -A INPUT -j LOG --log-level 4 --log-prefix 'PreRouting ' iptables -A OUTPUT -j LOG --log-level 4 --log-prefix 'PostRouting ' iptables-save > /etc/iptables.rules (where 10.0.0.241 is the IIS box hosting the HTTPS website), but this doesn't appear to be working. To clarify - I realize there's security implications about HTTPS proxying/caching - all I'm looking for is completely transparent IP traffic forwarding. I don't need to decrypt, cache or inspect any of the packets; I just want anything on port 443 to flow through the Linux box to the IIS box behind it as though the Linux box wasn't even there. Any help gratefully received... EDIT: Included full iptables config script.

Read the article
How can I use wildcards in an Nginx map directive?

- by Ian Clelland

I am trying to use Nginx to served cached files produced by a web application, and have spotted a potential problem; that the url-space is wide, and will exceed the Ext3 limit of 32000 subdirectories. I would like to break up the subdirectories, making, say, a two-level filesystem cache. So, where I am currently caching a file at /var/cache/www/arbitrary_directory_name/index.html I would store that instead at something like /var/cache/www/a/r/arbitrary_directory_name/index.html My trouble is that I can't get try_files, or even rewrite to make that mapping. My searching on the subject leads me to believe that I need to do something like this (heavily abbreviated): http { map $request_uri $prefix { /aa* a/a; /ab* a/b; /ac* a/c; ... /zz* z/z; } location / { try_files /var/cache/www/$prefix/$request_uri/index.html @fallback; # or # if (-f /var/cache/www/$prefix/$request_uri/index.html) { # rewrite ^(.*)$ /var/cache/www/$prefix/$1/index.html; # } } } But I can't get the /aa* pattern to match the incoming uri. Without the *, it will match an exact uri, but I can't get it to match just the first two characters. The Nginx documentation suggests that wildcards should be allowed, but I can't see a way to get them to work. Is there a way to do this? Am I missing something simple? Or am I going about this the wrong way?

Read the article
How can I "filter" postfix-generated bounce messages?

- by Flimzy

We are using postfix 2.7 and custom SMTPD (based on qpsmtpd) in highly customized configuration for spam filtering. We have a new requirement to filter postfix-generated bounces through our custom qpsmtpd process (not so much for content filtering, but to process these bounces accordingly). Our current configuration looks (in part) like this: main.cf (only customizations shown): 2526 inet n - - - 0 cleanup pickup fifo n - - 60 1 pickup -o content_filter=smtp:127.0.0.2 Our smtpd injects messages to postfix on port 2526, by speaking directly to the cleanup daemon. And the custom pickup command instructs postfix to hand off all locally-generated mail (from cron, nagios, or other custom scripts) to our custom smtpd. The problem is that this configuration does not affect postfix generated bounce messages, since they do not go through the pickup daemon. I have tried adding the same content_filter option to the bounce daemon commands, but it does not seem to have any effect: bounce unix - - - - 0 bounce -o content_filter=smtp:127.0.0.2 defer unix - - - - 0 bounce -o content_filter=smtp:127.0.0.2 trace unix - - - - 0 bounce -o content_filter=smtp:127.0.0.2 For reference, here is my main.cf file, as well: biff = no # TLS parameters smtpd_tls_loglevel = 0 smtpd_tls_cert_file=/etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem smtpd_tls_key_file=/etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key smtpd_use_tls=yes smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${queue_directory}/smtpd_scache smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${queue_directory}/smtp_scache smtp_tls_security_level = may mydestination = $myhostname alias_maps = proxy:pgsql:/etc/postfix/dc-aliases.cf transport_maps = proxy:pgsql:/etc/postfix/dc-transport.cf # This is enforced on incoming mail by QPSMTPD, so this is simply # the upper possible bound (also enforced in defaults.pl) message_size_limit = 262144000 mailbox_size_limit = 0 # We do our own message expiration, but if we set this to 0, then postfix # will try each mail delivery only once, so instead we set it to 100 days # (which is the max postfix seems to support) maximal_queue_lifetime = 100d hash_queue_depth = 1 hash_queue_names = deferred, defer, hold I also tried adding the internal_mail_filter_classes option to main.cf, but also tono affect: internal_mail_filter_classes = bounce,notify I am open to any suggestions, including handling our current content-filtering-loop in a different way. If it's not clear what I'm asking, please let me know, and I can try to clarify.

Read the article
How do I set up an email server that automatically maintains a list of previous recipients?

- by hsivonen

I want to set up an email server with the following characteristics. What software (besides bogofilter and clamav that I'm naming) should I use and what HOWTOs should I read? The server should run some flavor of Linux that's as low-maintenance as possible and self-updates for security patches in a timely fashion. (Debian stable?) When email is sent, all the recipients are stored in the list of previous recipients maintained by the server. Scan incoming messages with clamav and treat as spam if it contains viruses. When email arrives (if it passed clamav), if the sender is on the list of previous recipients, bypass spam filter. If the List-Id header names a mailing list on a manually maintained list of known-clean mailing lists, bypass spam filter and deliver into a mailbox depending on the mailing list name. Email that wasn't from previous recipients, manually white listed domains or mailing lists gets filtered by bogofilter. Spam goes into a spam mailbox. Email considered to be ham should automatically be fed to bogofilter training as ham. Email considered to be spam (incl. messages with viruses) should be automatically fed to bogofilter training as spam. There should be mailboxes for false ham and false spam that an IMAP client can move email into so that the server retrains bogofilter appropriately. Email sending requires SMTP over SSL. Email reading requires IMAPS. Should I also want to use SpamAssassin in addition to bogofilter?

Read the article
Reverse Proxy issues IIS on Windows Server 2012

- by ahwm

I've tried searching, but nothing seems to be working. I have a feeling it might be due to our custom Rewrite module. Here is the excerpt from the web.config that sets it up: <modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true"> <add name="UrlRewriteModule" type="EShop.UrlRewriteModule"/> </modules> EShop.UrlRewriteModule is a custom class in App_Code which handles incoming requests. I have set up the rewrite rules but it doesn't seem to want to work. I'm inclined to think that our rewrite class is interfering earlier than the proxy rules and saying that the page doesn't exist. Here's what we're trying to accomplish: We are working on a new site for a client, but they have a forum that they're not likely to want to move. I set up a new subdomain to point to the new server while the site is being completed (before we go live) and want the reverse proxy to forward test.domain.com/forum to www.domain.com/forum. After the site goes live, we'll need to forward using an IP address instead. I've set up a reverse proxy successfully with nginx, but we didn't want to set up another server if we didn't need to. Ideas?

Read the article

< Previous Page | 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 | Next Page >