Search Results

Search found 3358 results on 135 pages for 'ssl'.

Page 57/135 | < Previous Page | 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64  | Next Page >

• Is there a standard way to run a x509 key server?

  - by chotchki

  Does anyone know of a project / product that has standardized how to access/download x509/SSL certificates over HTTP? I have seen RFC 4387 but haven't found anyone who implements it. Basically, I am trying to setup a key server for an internal application. So short of implementing my own, does anyone have any suggestions?

  Read the article

• Open SSL without SHA1

  - by Hellnar

  Is there any way to use Open SSL without any SHA1 hash functions and using one of SHA2 functions instead of it? I think firstly, I should find all the functions that call SHA1 algorithm, and I should understand why SHA1 is still used. While changing the hash function, the bits are different in SHA1 and SHA2 so it may cause some problems. It confuses me...

  Read the article

• Does the majority A-grade browsers cache content over https to disk?

  - by nimo9367

  I have read somewhere that javascript and css files that only get cached in memory sooner or later get pushed out by other content. Is this true? Are there any other issues regarding cashing SSL-objects?

  Read the article

• ASP.NET - consume web service - https only - how?

  - by Steve

  I have web services built with ASP.NET and ASP.NET clients consuming them. When consuming the webservices, how would I to force the clients to use https? I don't want to force the whole site to use https by turning on require SSL in IIS. Can I use the IIS7 URL rewrite module to re-route http requests to https?

  Read the article

• WebSphere Plugin Keystore Unreadable by IHS - GSK_ERROR_BAD_KEYFILE_PASSWORD

  - by Seer

  Running WAS 6.1.xx in a network deployment. The IBM provided plugin keystore's "plugin-key.kdb" password expires on april 26th along with the personal cert inside it. So no problem right? Create new cert and set new password on the kdb, restash the password and off we go! Well no! On restart of IBM HTTP Server we see [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: lib_security: logSSLError: str_security (gsk error 408): GSK_ERROR_BAD_KEYFILE_PASSWORD [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: lib_security: initializeSecurity: Failed to initialize GSK environment [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: ws_transport: transportInitializeSecurity: Failed to initialize security [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: ws_server: serverAddTransport: Failed to initialize security [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: ws_server: serverAddTransport: HTTPS Transport is skipped [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: lib_security: logSSLError: str_security (gsk error 408): GSK_ERROR_BAD_KEYFILE_PASSWORD [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: lib_security: initializeSecurity: Failed to initialize GSK environment [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: ws_transport: transportInitializeSecurity: Failed to initialize security [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: ws_server: serverAddTransport: Failed to initialize security [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: ws_server: serverAddTransport: HTTPS Transport is skipped Here is the thing ... I can open the keystore using the new password with ikeyman and keytool. Using some "slightly dodgy" script, I can reverse the stash file and see that indeed the new password is set. Then, even if I restore the old keystore files (plugin-key.kdb,plugin-key.crl,plugin-key.sth,plugin-key.rdb) they no longer work either! So it must be permissions right? Well the permissions are the same as before, if I switch to apache user I can browse right through to the files and read them. I have even chown'ed them to apache:apache and/or chmod 777 and still its the same error! Does anyone have a clue what is going on here? Its pretty urgent as our site will be without HTTPS in a couple of days if this isn't resolved - thats bad for a retail web site :)

  Read the article

• Handshake violation when trying to access one website

  - by Miguel

  I have a TZ 190 Wireless Enhanced with SonicOS Enhanced 4.2.1.0-20e. Yesterday, people could access without any problems a bank website wich uses HTTPS. Today, it is imposible to access only that website, every other ones works without problems. When checking the log message filtering to my IP only, this is what appears and I suspect is the cause of this problem, because all other websites are working: Priority: Notice Category: Network Access Message: TCP handshake violation detected; TCP connection dropped Source: X.Y.Z.3, 51997, LAN (admin) Destination: 200.14.232.18, 443, WAN Notes: Handshake Timeout Where X.Y.Z.3 is my local IP. I've tried to change TCP Settings under Firewall option, and activated this options with no success: Enforce strict TCP compliance with RFC 793 and RFC 1122 and Enable TCP checksum enforcement I've also tried to find the MTU and at first I got: Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set But when I lower the value of ping -f -l to 1468 I got: Request timeout. Also I deactivate CFS in lan and wan zones. Nothing works. Can you please help me? Any Ideas?

  Read the article

• untrusted (self-sign) certificate on android browser

  - by Basiclife

  Hi all, Apologies for the brevity of this question but due to an unfortunate series of events, I've managed to brick my PC so am posting from my phone... We've just set up Windows Small Business Server 2008 at work which has an external web portal accessible via HTTPS. We haven't yet bought?installed any certificates. The portal provides access to email, sharepoint, remote desktop, etc.... (I'm aware some of these are never going to work on the phone) From firefox / other desktop browsers, this displays an "untrusted cert' warning which I can choose to ignore. When browsing from my mobile I get a popup notification which says. "A secure connection could not be established" when I OK this (my only option) I see the standard android-generated "unable to load page - has it moved?" Page. Does anyone know of a way to either accept the certificate temporarily or allow untrusted certificates generally? I'm aware that the latter option is non-ideal in the mid to long term but at the moment, I need to access the portal and am willing to either toggle settings as/when required or forego using the mobile for banking, etc... to mitigate my risk. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide and apologies again for brevity In case it helps I'm on the G1 running android 1.6 using the default browser

  Read the article

• Sonicwall SSL VPN: Unable to reconnect once connection drops

  - by Jeffrey Hantin

  One of my users is having problems with his NetExtender connection. After installing NetExtender from the portal, it connects fine -- ONCE. After that, attempting to reconnect gives Verifying user...authentication fail! and the log on the router shows: [timestamp] | Info | SSLVPN | Auth Failed: No user name in http request (message id: 1079) This seems odd to me because the user name, password and domain are entered on the NetExtender client. After this error occurs, the only way to connect again is to uninstall, reboot, and reinstall NetExtender. He can connect fine to the Sonicwall SSLVPN demo site, and a different user can connect fine to this site from a different PC. Any clues?

  Read the article

• certutil -ping fails with 30 seconds timeout - what to do?

  - by mark

  The certificate store on my Win7 box is constantly hanging. Observe: C:\1.cmd C:\certutil -? | findstr /i ping -ping -- Ping Active Directory Certificate Services Request interface -pingadmin -- Ping Active Directory Certificate Services Admin interface C:\set PROMPT=$P($t)$G C:\(13:04:28.57)certutil -ping CertUtil: -ping command FAILED: 0x80070002 (WIN32: 2) CertUtil: The system cannot find the file specified. C:\(13:04:58.68)certutil -pingadmin CertUtil: -pingadmin command FAILED: 0x80070002 (WIN32: 2) CertUtil: The system cannot find the file specified. C:\(13:05:28.79)set PROMPT=$P$G C:\ Explanations: The first command shows you that there are –ping and –pingadmin parameters to certutil Trying any ping parameter fails with 30 seconds timeout (the current time is seen in the prompt) This is a serious problem. It screws all the secure communication in my app. If anyone knows how this can be fixed - please share. Thanks. P.S. 1.cmd is simply a batch of these commands: certutil -? | findstr /i ping set PROMPT=$P($t)$G certutil -ping certutil -pingadmin set PROMPT=$P$G EDIT1 I have succeeded to pin down the single windows API that causes the problem - DsGetDcName According to the windbg, the certutil -ping invokes it like so: PDOMAIN_CONTROLLER_INFO pdci; DWORD ret = ::DsGetDcName(NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, DS_DIRECTORY_SERVICE_PREFERRED, &pdci); On my workstation it times out for 30 seconds and then returns error code 1355, which is ERROR_NO_SUCH_DOMAIN No domain controller is available for the specified domain or the domain does not exist. On another machine, which is accidentally a windows server 2003, it returns almost immediately with the correct domain controller name inside the returned DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_INFO structure. Now the question is what is missing on my workstation for that API to find the correct domain controller?

  Read the article

• Yum Update Failing mod_ssl and glibc_devel

  - by Kerry

  Any ideas on how to get this to not fail? # yum update Freeing read locks for locker 0x82: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x84: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x85: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x86: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x87: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x9a: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x9c: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x9d: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x9e: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x9f: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa0: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa1: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa2: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa3: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa4: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa5: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa6: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa7: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa8: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa9: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xaa: 4189/140342084876032 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.hmc.edu * epel: mirrors.kernel.org * extras: centos.mirror.freedomvoice.com * updates: mirrors.sonic.net Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies There are unfinished transactions remaining. You might consider running yum-complete-transaction first to finish them. The program yum-complete-transaction is found in the yum-utils package. --> Running transaction check ---> Package device-mapper-persistent-data.x86_64 0:0.2.8-2.el6 will be updated ---> Package device-mapper-persistent-data.x86_64 0:0.2.8-4.el6_5 will be an update ---> Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.12-1.132.el6 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6 for package: glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 ---> Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.12-1.132.el6_5.2 will be an update ---> Package httpd.x86_64 0:2.2.15-29.el6.centos will be updated --> Processing Dependency: httpd = 2.2.15-29.el6.centos for package: 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 ---> Package httpd.x86_64 0:2.2.15-30.el6.centos will be an update ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-431.17.1.el6 will be installed ---> Package kernel-devel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-431.17.1.el6 will be installed ---> Package selinux-policy-targeted.noarch 0:3.7.19-231.el6_5.1 will be updated ---> Package selinux-policy-targeted.noarch 0:3.7.19-231.el6_5.3 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 (@base) Requires: httpd = 2.2.15-29.el6.centos Removing: httpd-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 (@base) httpd = 2.2.15-29.el6.centos Updated By: httpd-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 (updates) httpd = 2.2.15-30.el6.centos Error: Package: glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 (@base) Requires: glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6 Removing: glibc-headers-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 (@base) glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6 Updated By: glibc-headers-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 (updates) glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6_5.2 Available: glibc-headers-2.12-1.132.el6_5.1.x86_64 (updates) glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6_5.1 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem ** Found 34 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: audit-2.2-4.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with audit-2.2-2.el6.x86_64 audit-libs-2.2-4.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with audit-libs-2.2-2.el6.x86_64 curl-7.19.7-37.el6_5.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with curl-7.19.7-37.el6_4.x86_64 device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-72.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-72.el6_5.1.x86_64 device-mapper-multipath-libs-0.4.9-72.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with device-mapper-multipath-libs-0.4.9-72.el6_5.1.x86_64 2:ethtool-3.5-1.4.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with 2:ethtool-3.5-1.2.el6_5.x86_64 glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 glibc-common-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-common-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 has missing requires of glibc-headers = ('0', '2.12', '1.132.el6_5.2') gnutls-2.8.5-14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with gnutls-2.8.5-13.el6_5.x86_64 httpd-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 has missing requires of httpd-tools = ('0', '2.2.15', '29.el6.centos') httpd-manual-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.noarch has missing requires of httpd = ('0', '2.2.15', '30.el6.centos') iproute-2.6.32-32.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with iproute-2.6.32-31.el6.x86_64 kernel-firmware-2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.noarch is a duplicate with kernel-firmware-2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.noarch kernel-headers-2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with kernel-headers-2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.x86_64 kpartx-0.4.9-72.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with kpartx-0.4.9-72.el6_5.1.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.10.3-15.el6_5.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with krb5-libs-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.x86_64 libblkid-2.17.2-12.14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with libblkid-2.17.2-12.14.el6.x86_64 libcurl-7.19.7-37.el6_5.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with libcurl-7.19.7-37.el6_4.x86_64 libcurl-devel-7.19.7-37.el6_5.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with libcurl-devel-7.19.7-37.el6_4.x86_64 libtasn1-2.3-6.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with libtasn1-2.3-3.el6_2.1.x86_64 libuuid-2.17.2-12.14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with libuuid-2.17.2-12.14.el6.x86_64 libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6.x86_64 mdadm-3.2.6-7.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with mdadm-3.2.6-7.el6.x86_64 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 is a duplicate with 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 has missing requires of httpd = ('0', '2.2.15', '30.el6.centos') nss-softokn-3.14.3-10.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with nss-softokn-3.14.3-9.el6.x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64 is a duplicate with openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.4.x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.14.x86_64 is a duplicate with openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64 openssl-devel-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.14.x86_64 is a duplicate with openssl-devel-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64 selinux-policy-3.7.19-231.el6_5.3.noarch is a duplicate with selinux-policy-3.7.19-231.el6_5.1.noarch tzdata-2014d-1.el6.noarch is a duplicate with tzdata-2014b-1.el6.noarch util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.14.el6.x86_64 UPDATE I installed and ran yum-complete-transaction as requested, it finished some things and suggested I run package-cleanup --problems, which yielded this: package-cleanup --problems Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Package httpd-manual-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.noarch requires httpd = ('0', '2.2.15', '30.el6.centos') Package httpd-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 requires httpd-tools = ('0', '2.2.15', '29.el6.centos') Package mod_ssl-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 requires httpd = ('0', '2.2.15', '30.el6.centos') Package glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 requires glibc-headers = ('0', '2.12', '1.132.el6_5.2') I'm definitely not a sys-admin, what would be the next step? UPDATE 2 I ran yum distro-sync: # yum distro-sync Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.hmc.edu * epel: mirrors.kernel.org * extras: centos.mirror.freedomvoice.com * updates: mirrors.sonic.net Setting up Distribution Synchronization Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.12-1.132.el6 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6 for package: glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 ---> Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.12-1.132.el6_5.2 will be an update ---> Package httpd.x86_64 0:2.2.15-29.el6.centos will be updated --> Processing Dependency: httpd = 2.2.15-29.el6.centos for package: 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 ---> Package httpd.x86_64 0:2.2.15-30.el6.centos will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 (@base) Requires: httpd = 2.2.15-29.el6.centos Removing: httpd-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 (@base) httpd = 2.2.15-29.el6.centos Updated By: httpd-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 (updates) httpd = 2.2.15-30.el6.centos Error: Package: glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 (@base) Requires: glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6 Removing: glibc-headers-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 (@base) glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6 Updated By: glibc-headers-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 (updates) glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6_5.2 Available: glibc-headers-2.12-1.132.el6_5.1.x86_64 (updates) glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6_5.1 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem ** Found 34 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: audit-2.2-4.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with audit-2.2-2.el6.x86_64 audit-libs-2.2-4.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with audit-libs-2.2-2.el6.x86_64 curl-7.19.7-37.el6_5.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with curl-7.19.7-37.el6_4.x86_64 device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-72.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-72.el6_5.1.x86_64 device-mapper-multipath-libs-0.4.9-72.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with device-mapper-multipath-libs-0.4.9-72.el6_5.1.x86_64 2:ethtool-3.5-1.4.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with 2:ethtool-3.5-1.2.el6_5.x86_64 glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 glibc-common-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-common-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 has missing requires of glibc-headers = ('0', '2.12', '1.132.el6_5.2') gnutls-2.8.5-14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with gnutls-2.8.5-13.el6_5.x86_64 httpd-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 has missing requires of httpd-tools = ('0', '2.2.15', '29.el6.centos') httpd-manual-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.noarch has missing requires of httpd = ('0', '2.2.15', '30.el6.centos') iproute-2.6.32-32.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with iproute-2.6.32-31.el6.x86_64 kernel-firmware-2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.noarch is a duplicate with kernel-firmware-2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.noarch kernel-headers-2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with kernel-headers-2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.x86_64 kpartx-0.4.9-72.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with kpartx-0.4.9-72.el6_5.1.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.10.3-15.el6_5.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with krb5-libs-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.x86_64 libblkid-2.17.2-12.14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with libblkid-2.17.2-12.14.el6.x86_64 libcurl-7.19.7-37.el6_5.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with libcurl-7.19.7-37.el6_4.x86_64 libcurl-devel-7.19.7-37.el6_5.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with libcurl-devel-7.19.7-37.el6_4.x86_64 libtasn1-2.3-6.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with libtasn1-2.3-3.el6_2.1.x86_64 libuuid-2.17.2-12.14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with libuuid-2.17.2-12.14.el6.x86_64 libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6.x86_64 mdadm-3.2.6-7.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with mdadm-3.2.6-7.el6.x86_64 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 is a duplicate with 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 has missing requires of httpd = ('0', '2.2.15', '30.el6.centos') nss-softokn-3.14.3-10.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with nss-softokn-3.14.3-9.el6.x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64 is a duplicate with openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.4.x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.14.x86_64 is a duplicate with openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64 openssl-devel-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.14.x86_64 is a duplicate with openssl-devel-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64 selinux-policy-3.7.19-231.el6_5.3.noarch is a duplicate with selinux-policy-3.7.19-231.el6_5.1.noarch tzdata-2014d-1.el6.noarch is a duplicate with tzdata-2014b-1.el6.noarch util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.14.el6.x86_64

  Read the article

• Oops, no RSA or DSA server certificate found for 'server.host.name:0'?

  - by Scott Warren

  I'm setting up a new web server that hosts a dozen virtual hosts on Ubuntu 12.4 using Apache 2.2.22 with one config file per site. I created all the configuration files all at once and ran a2ensite * to enable them all at once. When I reloaded the configuration it failed and after restarting apache I found the following error message in my error.log: Oops, no RSA or DSA server certificate found for 'server.host.name:0'?! Most of the results for this error message are years old that don't fix the problem or are bugs that have been fixed https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31709

  Read the article

• Check if root ca certificate is installed

  - by Zulakis

  We are having a custom CA for our local-domains. The Root CA certificate is installed on all the corporate machines by default, but sometimes it happens that we have someone here who doesn't have it installed. If the user a) accesses our intranet using http or b) accepts the server-certificate I would like to redirect the user to a site which tells it what happened and how they can install the root CA. The only solution I found was the following: <img src="https://the_site/the_image" onerror="redirectToCertPage()"> This is barely a work-around and not really a solution. It can be triggered by other problems then the missing certificate. Are there any better solutions on how to solve this problem?

  Read the article

• Import a bunch of certificates into the correct certificate store using a script

  - by Jesse Weigert

  I have a collection of certificates in a p7b file, and I would like to automatically import each certificate into the correct store depending on the certificate template. What is the best way to do this with a script? I tried using certutil -addstore root Certificate.p7b, and that will correctly place all of the root CAs into the root store, but it returns an error if it encounters any other type of certificate. I'm willing to use batch scripts, vbscript or powershell to accomplish this task. Thanks!

  Read the article

• Amazon EC2 - HTTPS - Certificate body is invalid. The body must not contain a private key

  - by Tam Minh

  I'm very new to Amazon EC2. I am trying to setup https for my website, I follow the offical instruction from amazon doc: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticbeanstalk/latest/dg/configuring-https.html When I Upload a Signed Certificate using AWS command aws iam upload-server-certificate --server-certificate-name dichcumga --certificate-body file://mycert.pem --private-key file://signedkey.pem --certificate-chain file://mychain.pem And I got error A client error (MalformedCertificate) occurred when calling the UploadServerCert ificate operation: Certificate body is invalid. The body must not contain a private key. mycert.pem is a combination of private.pem and signedkey.pem (which return by VeriSign) copy private.pem+signedkey.pem mycert.pem Please help to shed a light. Thank you in advance.

  Read the article

• Code signing issues.

  - by abc

  i have purchased a certificate from godaddy, i have that in .pfx format. i tried to convert it into .cer using IE and ff. using converted .cer file when i try to sign midlet. i am getting following error message "The KeyStore does not contain private key associated with this alias !!" "Cannot sign" how to get work done?

  Read the article

• Root certificate authority works windows/linux but not mac osx - (malformed)

  - by AKwhat

  I have created a self-signed root certificate authority which if I install onto windows, linux, or even using the certificate store in firefox (windows/linux/macosx) will work perfectly with my terminating proxy. I have installed it into the system keychain and I have set the certificate to always trust. Within the chrome browser details it says "The certificate that Chrome received during this connection attempt is not formatted correctly, so Chrome cannot use it to protect your information. Error type: Malformed certificate" I used this code to create the certificate: openssl genrsa -des3 -passout pass:***** -out private/server.key 4096 openssl req -batch -passin pass:***** -new -x509 -nodes -sha1 -days 3600 -key private/server.key -out server.crt -config ../openssl.cnf If the issue is NOT that it is malformed (because it works everywhere else) then what else could it be? Am I installing it incorrectly? To be clear: Within the windows/linux OS, all browsers work perfectly. Within mac only firefox works if it uses its internal certificate store and not the keychain. It's the keychain method of importing a certificate that causes the issue. Thus, all browsers using the keychain will not work. Root CA Cert: -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- **some base64 stuff** -----END CERTIFICATE----- Intermediate CA Cert: Certificate: Data: Version: 3 (0x2) Serial Number: 1 (0x1) Signature Algorithm: sha1WithRSAEncryption Issuer: C=*****, ST=*******, L=******, O=*******, CN=******/emailAddress=****** Validity Not Before: May 21 13:57:32 2014 GMT Not After : Jun 20 13:57:32 2014 GMT Subject: C=*****, ST=********, O=*******, CN=*******/emailAddress=******* Subject Public Key Info: Public Key Algorithm: rsaEncryption RSA Public Key: (4096 bit) Modulus (4096 bit): 00:e7:2d:75:38:23:02:8e:b9:8d:2f:33:4c:2a:11: 6d:d4:f8:29:ab:f3:fc:12:00:0f:bb:34:ec:35:ed: a5:38:10:1e:f3:54:c2:69:ae:3b:22:c0:0d:00:97: 08:da:b9:c9:32:c0:c6:b1:8b:22:7e:53:ea:69:e2: 6d:0f:bd:f5:96:b2:d0:0d:b2:db:07:ba:f1:ce:53: 8a:5e:e0:22:ce:3e:36:ed:51:63:21:e7:45:ad:f9: 4d:9b:8f:7f:33:4c:ed:fc:a6:ac:16:70:f5:96:36: 37:c8:65:47:d1:d3:12:70:3e:8d:2f:fb:9f:94:e0: c9:5f:d0:8c:30:e0:04:23:38:22:e5:d9:84:15:b8: 31:e7:a7:28:51:b8:7f:01:49:fb:88:e9:6c:93:0e: 63:eb:66:2b:b4:a0:f0:31:33:8b:b4:04:84:1f:9e: d5:ed:23:cc:bf:9b:8e:be:9a:5c:03:d6:4f:1a:6f: 2d:8f:47:60:6c:89:c5:f0:06:df:ac:cb:26:f8:1a: 48:52:5e:51:a0:47:6a:30:e8:bc:88:8b:fd:bb:6b: c9:03:db:c2:46:86:c0:c5:a5:45:5b:a9:a3:61:35: 37:e9:fc:a1:7b:ae:71:3a:5c:9c:52:84:dd:b2:86: b3:2e:2e:7a:5b:e1:40:34:4a:46:f0:f8:43:26:58: 30:87:f9:c6:c9:bc:b4:73:8b:fc:08:13:33:cc:d0: b7:8a:31:e9:38:a3:a9:cc:01:e2:d4:c2:a5:c1:55: 52:72:52:2b:06:a3:36:30:0c:5c:29:1a:dd:14:93: 2b:9d:bf:ac:c1:2d:cd:3f:89:1f:bc:ad:a4:f2:bd: 81:77:a9:f4:f0:b9:50:9e:fb:f5:da:ee:4e:b7:66: e5:ab:d1:00:74:29:6f:01:28:32:ea:7d:3f:b3:d7: 97:f2:60:63:41:0f:30:6a:aa:74:f4:63:4f:26:7b: 71:ed:57:f1:d4:99:72:61:f4:69:ad:31:82:76:67: 21:e1:32:2f:e8:46:d3:28:61:b1:10:df:4c:02:e5: d3:cc:22:30:a4:bb:81:10:dc:7d:49:94:b2:02:2d: 96:7f:e5:61:fa:6b:bd:22:21:55:97:82:18:4e:b5: a0:67:2b:57:93:1c:ef:e5:d2:fb:52:79:95:13:11: 20:06:8c:fb:e7:0b:fd:96:08:eb:17:e6:5b:b5:a0: 8d:dd:22:63:99:af:ad:ce:8c:76:14:9a:31:55:d7: 95:ea:ff:10:6f:7c:9c:21:00:5e:be:df:b0:87:75: 5d:a6:87:ca:18:94:e7:6a:15:fe:27:dd:28:5e:c0: ad:d2:91:d3:2d:8e:c3:c0:9f:fb:ff:c0:36:7e:e2: d7:bc:41 Exponent: 65537 (0x10001) X509v3 extensions: X509v3 Subject Alternative Name: DNS:localhost, DNS:dropbox.com, DNS:*.dropbox.com, DNS:filedropper.com, DNS:*.filedropper.com X509v3 Subject Key Identifier: F3:E5:38:5B:3C:AF:1C:73:C1:4C:7D:8B:C8:A1:03:82:65:0D:FF:45 X509v3 Authority Key Identifier: keyid:2B:37:39:7B:9F:45:14:FE:F8:BC:CA:E0:6E:B4:5F:D6:1A:2B:D7:B0 DirName:/C=****/ST=******/L=*******/O=*******/CN=******/emailAddress=******* serial:EE:8C:A3:B4:40:90:B0:62 X509v3 Basic Constraints: CA:TRUE Signature Algorithm: sha1WithRSAEncryption 46:2a:2c:e0:66:e3:fa:c6:80:b6:81:e7:db:c3:29:ab:e7:1c: f0:d9:a0:b7:a9:57:8c:81:3e:30:8f:7d:ef:f7:ed:3c:5f:1e: a5:f6:ae:09:ab:5e:63:b4:f6:d6:b6:ac:1c:a0:ec:10:19:ce: dd:5a:62:06:b4:88:5a:57:26:81:8e:38:b9:0f:26:cd:d9:36: 83:52:ec:df:f4:63:ce:a1:ba:d4:1c:ec:b6:66:ed:f0:32:0e: 25:87:79:fa:95:ee:0f:a0:c6:2d:8f:e9:fb:11:de:cf:26:fa: 59:fa:bd:0b:74:76:a6:5d:41:0d:cd:35:4e:ca:80:58:2a:a8: 5d:e4:d8:cf:ef:92:8d:52:f9:f2:bf:65:50:da:a8:10:1b:5e: 50:a7:7e:57:7b:94:7f:5c:74:2e:80:ae:1e:24:5f:0b:7b:7e: 19:b6:b5:bd:9d:46:5a:e8:47:43:aa:51:b3:4b:3f:12:df:7f: ef:65:21:85:c2:f6:83:84:d0:8d:8b:d9:6d:a8:f9:11:d4:65: 7d:8f:28:22:3c:34:bb:99:4e:14:89:45:a4:62:ed:52:b1:64: 9a:fd:08:cd:ff:ca:9e:3b:51:81:33:e6:37:aa:cb:76:01:90: d1:39:6f:6a:8b:2d:f5:07:f8:f4:2a:ce:01:37:ba:4b:7f:d4: 62:d7:d6:66:b8:78:ad:0b:23:b6:2e:b0:9a:fc:0f:8c:4c:29: 86:a0:bc:33:71:e5:7f:aa:3e:0e:ca:02:e1:f6:88:f0:ff:a2: 04:5a:f5:d7:fe:7d:49:0a:d2:63:9c:24:ed:02:c7:4d:63:e6: 0c:e1:04:cd:a4:bf:a8:31:d3:10:db:b4:71:48:f7:1a:1b:d9: eb:a7:2e:26:00:38:bd:a8:96:b4:83:09:c9:3d:79:90:e1:61: 2c:fc:a0:2c:6b:7d:46:a8:d7:17:7f:ae:60:79:c1:b6:5c:f9: 3c:84:64:7b:7f:db:e9:f1:55:04:6e:b5:d3:5e:d3:e3:13:29: 3f:0b:03:f2:d7:a8:30:02:e1:12:f4:ae:61:6f:f5:4b:e9:ed: 1d:33:af:cd:9b:43:42:35:1a:d4:f6:b9:fb:bf:c9:8d:6c:30: 25:33:43:49:32:43:a5:a8:d8:82:ef:b0:a6:bd:8b:fb:b6:ed: 72:fd:9a:8f:00:3b:97:a3:35:a4:ad:26:2f:a9:7d:74:08:82: 26:71:40:f9:9b:01:14:2e:82:fb:2f:c0:11:51:00:51:07:f9: e1:f6:1f:13:6e:03:ee:d7:85:c2:64:ce:54:3f:15:d4:d7:92: 5f:87:aa:1e:b4:df:51:77:12:04:d2:a5:59:b3:26:87:79:ce: ee:be:60:4e:87:20:5c:7f -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- **some base64 stuff** -----END CERTIFICATE-----

  Read the article

• The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server

  - by chandank

  I have tomcat server behind the apache. I am using mod_ssl and reverse proxy to the tomcat. All are running at default ports. The full error is as follow. ack Proxy Error The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. The proxy server could not handle the request POST /pages/doeditpage.action. Reason: Error reading from remote server If I clean the browser cache the error goes away and comes back after few attempts. I test the same on Chrome/Firefox/IE on Windows platform. Wondering it works perfectly on Linux based Chrome/Firefox. I googled a lot there are few answers at stack overflow but I am not able to find my answer. Is this a server side problem? because so many browsers cant be wrong at same time on Windows.

  Read the article

• How to check a digital certificate?

  - by StackedCrooked

  I have extracted a certificate from a cable modem. Now I want to verify if this certificate is valid. If I understand correctly, the verification process consists of having the issuer sign the subject's public key and then comparing the result with the subject's signature. This signing process is done using the issuer's private key, which nobody but the issuer has access to. So even if I have both certificates on my PC, there is no way for me to verify the subject's validity. From this I can only conclude that the verification must be implemented as a remote service. The problem is that I don't know what remote service I need to access to verify this certificate. The issuer is "AVM GmbH Cable Modem Root Certificate Authority". How can I find the webservice for verification? Is there standard lookup mechanism for this?

  Read the article

• Connection problem between redmine and svn

  - by WombaT

  I have server controlled by Debian 6.0. I installed and configured redmine some time ago, and now configured svn server. Now i'm trying to configure redmine to be able to view svn repository. URL is: https://192.168.11.78/svn/bee Connection is not working, log show this error: Error parsing svn output: #<REXML::ParseException: No close tag for /lists/list> Google says that its common error, and its possible to fix it by permamently accept of server certificate so i did it and nothing. Still dont work. Later, i added [global] store-plaintext-passwords = no in file .subversion/servers I did this (and cert accept) for both root and www-data users. Nothing helped, still got error in redmine The entry or revision was not found in the repository. What else i can do with it?

  Read the article

• How often is CRL refreshed, and how to force it to be?

  - by lockstock

  I have a web service running under IIS 7 that requires an X509 client certificate. I know that the server that it rus on needs access to DigiCert.com in order to be able to get the CRL (Certificate Revocation List). There is a need to change our proxy so I am attempting to investigate the impact of doing so. I have removed the global proxy settings using the command netsh winhttp proxy refesh, and also deleted the CRL cache using the command certutil -URLcache CRL delete. However, after doing this, all calls to the web service still succeed. This suggests to me that I am missing something here. So; If the CRL cache is cleared and the server has no way of refreshing the CRL, why do web service requets not return http 403?. I have been unable to find adequate information from googling nor from my colleagues. The reason I want it to fail is that I will not be confident that the new proxy settings work until I can see it broken first, if that makes sense. I would also like to be able to force the CRL to be refeshed in order to ensure that the new proxy settings work

  Read the article

• Server unresponsive after successful OpenSSL connection

  - by Dan B

  I'm testing server connections using OpenSSL, with varying results Server A: connection is successful, as are user login and the other commands I expected to work Server B: connection is successful, but the server is unresponsive when I try to submit a command. I don't get an error, or even a disconnection – just a blank line from where I hit Enter or ^M My hunch is that Server B's configuration requires a different character encoding or something and it's simply not recognizing my Enter keystroke, but I've looked to no avail... any suggestions would be appreciated!

  Read the article

• Plesk + Apache + PHP (FastCGI): Constant session permissions problems, conflicts between HTTP / HTTPS

  - by Hans Engel

  I've just moved a collection of sites over to a brand-new server, running Apache 2.2.3, PHP 5.3, and Plesk 10.1.1. I am having problems with file permissions on PHP sessions, which are being stored in /var/lib/php/session. I originally set the permissions like so for this folder: drwxrwx--- 2 apache psacln 8192 Mar 22 23:25 session This worked fine, for HTTP sessions. Files were being saved in that folder with these permissions: -rw------- 1 client1 psacln 0 Mar 22 23:24 sess_507... -rw------- 1 client2 psacln 0 Mar 22 23:25 sess_8o1... The problem, however, is that PHP scripts accessed via HTTPS do not seem to be run by the same client1 or client2 user. I deleted files in the session directory and accessed a login page via HTTPS to see how sessions were being saved when initiated via this protocol: -rw------- 1 apache apache 0 Mar 22 23:25 sess_507... So, for whatever reason, sessions initiated by clients browsing with HTTPS were being saved by apache:apache, while sessions from HTTP clients were saved with someclient:psacln. What I'd like to ask: How can I avoid this problem with session permissions? When sessions are created via unencrypted HTTP and a client visits an HTTPS portion of the site, permission errors are shown, since apache:apache tries to access the session save created by someclient:psacln. The converse is also true. Can I change the user which runs the Apache HTTPS server, via Plesk or the command line? If not, can I have PHP sessions save with rw-rw---- permissions, and then add apache to the psacln group? Any other suggestions on how to fix this issue?

  Read the article

• Troubleshooting certificate issues

  - by Weezy

  I'm trying to access my (European Parliament) Webmail from a Linux/Firefox machine at the following address and I get security warning messages explaining that the identity of the site cannot be verified (the error message is in french). But this only happens with Linux/Firefox from one machine. Here's the address: https://webmail.europarl.europa.eu/ (and I'm trying to access it from my home, not from the EP). And here's the detailed error message: webmail.europarl.europa.eu utilise un certificat de sécurité invalide. Le certificat n'est pas sûr car l'autorité délivrant le certificat est inconnue. (Code d'erreur : sec_error_unknown_issuer) So basically, if I translate, it is telling that the webmail.europarl.europa.eu certificate is invalid because the authority that delivered the certificate is unknown. I do only get this invalid certificate thing on Linux/Firefox. From a MacBookPro running Safari, I go to what looks like the correct webmail login page. From the same Linux machine, but using another user account and Chrome instead of Firefox, I go to what looks like the correct webmail login page. So there are several possibilities, here are a few ones: Firefox is right and my Linux box has been hacked Firefox is right and detecting something that neither Chrome nor Safari is detecting (like, say, my router that may be hacked) Safari on the MacBook Pro and Chrome on Linux are both correct and it is just Firefox on Linux that is wrongly stressing me when everything is normal. How do I know which one of these possibilities (or any other) is correct? How can I troubleshoot what is going on with either Linux/Firefox or with the parliament's webmail?

  Read the article

• How to create my own certificate chain?

  - by StackedCrooked

  I would like to setup my own OCSP Responder (just for testing purposes). This requires me to have a root certificate and a few certificates generated from it. I've managed to create a self-signed certificate using openssl. I want to use it as the root certificate. The next step would be to create the derived certificates. I can't seem to find the documentation on how to do this however. Does anyone know where I can find this information?

  Read the article

• Why is my RapidSSL Certificate chain is not trusted on ubuntu?

  - by olouv

  I have a website that works perfectly with Chrome & other browser but i get some errors with PHP in CLI mode so i'm investigating it, running this: openssl s_client -showcerts -verify 32 -connect dev.carlipa-online.com:443 Quite suprisingly my HTTPS appears untrusted with a Verify return code: 27 (certificate not trusted) Here is the raw output : verify depth is 32 CONNECTED(00000003) depth=2 C = US, O = GeoTrust Inc., CN = GeoTrust Global CA verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate verify return:1 depth=2 C = US, O = GeoTrust Inc., CN = GeoTrust Global CA verify error:num=27:certificate not trusted verify return:1 depth=1 C = US, O = "GeoTrust, Inc.", CN = RapidSSL CA verify return:1 depth=0 serialNumber = khKDXfnS0WtB8DgV0CAdsmWrXl-Ia9wZ, C = FR, O = *.carlipa-online.com, OU = GT44535187, OU = See www.rapidssl.com/resources/cps (c)12, OU = Domain Control Validated - RapidSSL(R), CN = *.carlipa-online.com verify return:1 So GeoTrust Global CA appears to be not trusted on the system (Ubuntu 11.10). Added Equifax_Secure_CA to try to solve this... But i get in this case Verify return code: 19 (self signed certificate in certificate chain) ! Raw output : verify depth is 32 CONNECTED(00000003) depth=3 C = US, O = Equifax, OU = Equifax Secure Certificate Authority verify error:num=19:self signed certificate in certificate chain verify return:1 depth=3 C = US, O = Equifax, OU = Equifax Secure Certificate Authority verify return:1 depth=2 C = US, O = GeoTrust Inc., CN = GeoTrust Global CA verify return:1 depth=1 C = US, O = "GeoTrust, Inc.", CN = RapidSSL CA verify return:1 depth=0 serialNumber = khKDXfnS0WtB8DgV0CAdsmWrXl-Ia9wZ, C = FR, O = *.carlipa-online.com, OU = GT44535187, OU = See www.rapidssl.com/resources/cps (c)12, OU = Domain Control Validated - RapidSSL(R), CN = *.carlipa-online.com verify return:1 Edit Looks like my server does not trust/provide the Equifax Root CA, however i do correctly have the file in /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla/Equifax...

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64  | Next Page >