Search Results

Search found 23754 results on 951 pages for 'unobtrusive javascript'.

Page 574/951 | < Previous Page | 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581  | Next Page >

  • Getting Result of $q's Resolution or Rejection

    - by Kevin Meredith
    I'm looking at a $q example from Mastering Web Application Development with Angular. For this code, how can I retrieve the String result of pizzaOrderFulfillment.resolve(...) or pizzaOrderFulfillment.reject? var myApp = angular.module('myApp',[]); myApp.controller("MyCtrl", function ($scope, $q) { var Person = function(name) { this.eat = function(food) { return name + " is eating " + food; }; this.beHungry = function(reason) { return name + " is hungry because" + reason; }; }; // success var pizzaOrderFulfillment = $q.defer(); var pizzaDelivered = pizzaOrderFulfillment.promise; var man = new Person("man"); pizzaDelivered.then(man.eat, man.beHungry); pizzaOrderFulfillment.resolve("chicken"); // TODO: var successResult = "man is eating chicken" });

    Read the article

  • How to decide if a parameter is the click event

    - by sameold
    I have a function which can be called by either a click event or directly. When I call it directly, I need pass it a data parameter, so I've defined the function to accept a parameter to account for the direct call with the parameter. function myFunc(param){ } Within the function, I need to differentiate whether the function was called directly or from the click event, so what I thought I could simply check if param is set. If it's set, then the function is called directly. If it's not set, then it's called from the click event. The problem is that a click event by default passes an event object. So even when the function is called by the click event, param won't be null. So is there a way to check whether the param passed is the click event?

    Read the article

  • How not to lose focus on a login page

    - by Misha Moroshko
    I have a simple login form with 2 input fields: "username" and "password". "username" field is focused by default. The problem is that when user clicks outside "username" or "password" fields, the focus is gone (it is neither on "username" nor on "password" fields"). How can I force the focus to be on these 2 fields only ? In my case, this is a really annoying behavior, so I really want to do this :) Can I do something like: $("*").focus(function() { if (!$(this).hasClass("my_inputs_class")) { // How to stop the focusing process here ? } }); ?

    Read the article

  • Detecting Handlers of a jQuery "Live" Event

    - by Anderson De Andrade
    Using: $('#foo').data('events').click We are able to access an iterative object of click handlers added to the element '#foo' but only when they were added with .bind() Is there a way to get the handlers for an event added with .live()? Is there any other way to know if an element has a click handler assigned?

    Read the article

  • add element to the DOM with JS

    - by john
    I want add element with JS. I have code: var collection = document.getElementsByTagName('body');<br> var a = document.createElement('div');<br> a.innerHTML = 'some text';<br> collection.item(0).firstChild.appendChild(a);<br> and simple HTML: <html> <head> </head> <body> </body> </html> When is misstake?

    Read the article

  • Need help with jQuery/AJAX call in Safari/Mac

    - by protohominid
    I've got something that works perfectly in FF and MSIE but it's not working properly in Safari. It's a form with selects that get updated via AJAX/jQuery from a MySQL DB. In Safari, when you select the first item, it correctly loads the options for the next select menu; however, when you choose one of those (which loads new options in a subsequent select menu), the whole form resets and is broken from that point on. Does anyone know of a Safari bug that would cause this? Here's the JS: $(document).ready(function(){ $("#searchForm select").change(updateSearchForm); }); function updateSearchForm() { $.ajax({ url: '/elements/search_form.php?ajax=true', data: $('#searchForm').serialize(), error:function(xhr,err){ alert("readyState: "+xhr.readyState+"\nstatus: "+xhr.status); alert("responseText: "+xhr.responseText); }, success: function(data) { $("#searchForm").html(data); $("#searchForm select").change(updateSearchForm); } }); } I can post the relevant PHP/HTML for the form, but it's lengthy. I'm relatively new to JS so I'm not sure where to start debugging this... TIA

    Read the article

  • stop cript debug error dialogs occur in ie8 ?

    - by Haroldo
    I get this, clicking 'no' means the page displays flawlessly. it's refering to this part of jquery1.4.2.js: // Get the Nth element in the matched element set OR // Get the whole matched element set as a clean array get: function( num ) { return num == null ? // Return a 'clean' array this.toArray() : // Return just the object ( num < 0 ? this.slice(num)[ 0 ] : this[ num ] ); }, I assume i'm calling something in the wrong context somewhere in one of my js files (which would be a real mission to find). Will standard IE8 users get this error? (i imagine ms make it pretty difficult to reinstall ie!)

    Read the article

  • mootools event listener disappears after element.innerHTML is changed

    - by baiano
    I putting together a page that will display a set of stored values. I am using mootools and AJAX calls to update the values without needing to refresh the page each time the user selects a new item from the drop down menus. the HTML each line looks something like: <div class="selections"> <input class="checkbox selector" type="checkbox" CHECKED /> <span class="b_name"> <select class="b_n selector"> <!-- options --> </select> </span> <span class="b_level"> <select class="b_l selector"> <!-- options --> </select> </span> <span class="values"> <!-- the values --> </span> In the head I have set up an event listener like: $$('.selector').addEvent('change', function(event){changeValues(this);}); My problem is that when the "b_name" select changes I have to update the list of options in the "b_level" select. I accomplish that by getting a list of the possible options from my database through a php script on another page and replacing "b_level"'s innerHTML. Once I do that, the event listener attached to "b_l selector" no longer works. I tried to resolve this issue by explicitly attaching an event listener to "b_l selector" each time "b_name" changes like so: row.getElement('.b_l').addEvent('change', function(event){changeValues(row.getElement('.b_l'));}); where 'row' is the html element 'div.selections'. It still isn't working and I have no idea what's going on. Can anyone offer a suggestion as to how I can get this resolved? or perhaps a better way to do what I'm doing. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Why does my if statement always evaluate to true?

    - by Pobe
    I need to go through the months of the year and find out if the last day of the month is 28, 29, 30 or 31. My problem is that the first if statement always evaluates to true: MOIS_I = 31 if (mois == "Janvier" || "Mars" || "Mai" || "Juillet" || "Août" || "Octobre" || "Décembre" || "1" || "3" || "5" || "7" || "8" || "10" || "12" || "01" || "03" || "05" || "07" || "08") { window.alert("Le mois " + mois + " de l'année " + annee + " compte " + MOIS_I + " jours "); } Also, it seems like it is necessary to do if (mois == "Janver" || mois == "Février" || ... ) and so on, but I wanted to know if there was a better way to do it. Here is the full code: var mois, annee, test4, test100, test400; const MOIS_P = 30; const MOIS_I = 31; const FEV_NORM = 28; const FEV_BISSEX = 29; const TEST_4 = 4; const TEST_100 = 100; const TEST_400 = 400; mois = window.prompt("Entrez un mois de l'année", ""); annee = window.prompt("Entrez l'année de ce mois", ""); /* MOIS IMPAIRS */ if (mois == "Janvier" || "Mars" || "Mai" || "Juillet" || "Août" || "Octobre" || "Décembre" || "1" || "3" || "5" || "7" || "8" || "10" || "12" || "01" || "03" || "05" || "07" || "08") { window.alert("Le mois " + mois + " de l'année " + annee + " compte " + MOIS_I + " jours "); /* MOIS PAIRS */ } else if (mois == "Février" || "Avril" || "Juin" || "Septembre" || "Novembre" || "2" || "4" || "6" || "9" || "11" || "02" || "04" || "06" || "09") { if (mois == "Février") { test4 = parseInt(annee) % TEST_4; test100 = parseInt(annee) % TEST_100; test400 = parseInt(annee) % TEST_400; if (test4 == 0) { if (test100 != 0) { window.alert("Le mois " + mois + " de l'année " + annee + " compte " + FEV_BISSEX + " jours "); } else { window.alert("Le mois " + mois + " de l'année " + annee + " compte " + FEV_NORM + " jours "); } } else if (test400 == 0) { window.alert("Le mois " + mois + " de l'année " + annee + " compte " + FEV_BISSEX + " jours "); } else { window.alert("Le mois " + mois + " de l'année " + annee + " compte " + FEV_NORM + " jours "); } } else { window.alert("Le mois " + mois + " de l'année " + annee + " compte " + MOIS_P + " jours "); } } else { window.alert("Apocalypse!"); } TEST_4, TEST_100, TEST_400 are to test if the year is a leap year (which means february has 29 days instead of 28). Thank you!

    Read the article

  • What are the best security measures to take for making certain directories private?

    - by Sattvic
    I have a directory on my server that I do not want Search Engines to crawl and I already set this rule in robots.txt I do want people that have logged in to be able to have access to this directory without having to enter a password or anything. I am thinking that a cookie is the best thing to put on users computers after they login, and if they have a cookie, they can access the directory. Is this possible, or is there a better way? I want people without this cookie to not have access to this directory - access for members only Any suggestions on the best design for this?

    Read the article

  • Access-Control-Request-Header: - x-requested-with

    - by Tom
    Hi Guys, I am building a widget for my users and trying to get it working however I keep running into a X-Domain issue with this header. httpfox gives me - NS_ERROR_DOM_BAD_URI - and on further investigation I find that its Access-Control-Request-Method: GET Access-Control-Request-Header: x-requested-with I am not sure why its not loading but I basically call a script and then I am trying to grab some html to load it but it gets blocked with the above headers. How can I get around this prob ?

    Read the article

  • The best way to write a jQuery plugin - If there is such a way?

    - by Nick Lowman
    There are quite a few ways to write plugins i.e. here's a nice example and what I've seen quite a lot of lately is the following code pattern and it's used by Doug Neiner here; (function($){ $.formatLink = function(el, options){ var base = this; base.$el = $(el); base.el = el; base.$el.data("formatLink", base); base.init = function(){ base.options = $.extend({}, $.formatLink.defaultOptions, options); //code here } base.init(); }; $.formatLink.defaultOptions = { }; $.fn.formatLink = function(options){ return this.each(function(){ (new $.formatLink(this, options)); }); }; })(jQuery); So, can anyone tell me the benefits of using the pattern above rather than the one below. I can't see the point in calling the $.extend function for every element in the jQuery stack (above), where the example below only does this once and then works on the stack. To test it I created two plugins, using both patterns, which applied styles to about 5000 li elements and the code below took about 1 second whereas the pattern above took about 1.3 seconds. (function($){ $.fn.formatLink = function(options){ var options = $.extend({}, $.fn.formatLink.defaultOptions, options || {}); return this.each(function(){ //code here }); }); $.fn.formatLink.defaultOptions ={} })(jQuery);

    Read the article

  • Image not showing in Chrome

    - by dmr
    I am attempting to set the source of an image. The image shows up correctly in IE and Firefox, but it doesn't show in Chrome. //image is set to 1 or 2 document.getElementById("loadImg").src = "./images/loading" + image + ".gif"; What do I have to change for this to work in Chrome?

    Read the article

  • jquery mouseleave issue when moving too slow

    - by David
    Hello. I am using the jQuery mouseenter and mouseleave events to slide a div down and up. Everything works well except for the mouseleave which doesn't appear to fire ONLY if the mouse of moved off of the div quite slowly. If i move the mouse at a relatively normal or fast speed then it works as expected. Can anyone explain this or provide any info on how to get around this? Code: $(document).ready(function() { $('header').mouseenter(function() { $(this).stop().animate({'top' : '25px'}, 500, function() { $(this).delay(600).animate({'top' : '-50px'}, 500); }); }). mouseleave(function(e) { var position = $(this).position(); if (e.pageY > position.top + $(this).height()) { $(this).stop().delay(600).animate({'top' : '-75px'}, 500) ; } }); });

    Read the article

  • Ajax response is taking time to populate.

    - by Rachel
    I am having an util class which is not owned by me. I am calling one of the method of that util class which inturn calls one ajax function. And gives me response back. I need to make a decision depending on the response object. The problem is that response object takes some time to populate(mili seconds). var selector = dojo.byId("SelectorId"); var theChart = new chart( selector, 135, 92, style, frequency, time); if(theChart.data ===null){ console.log("No response"); }else{ Console.log("Use response data"); } and chart( selector, 135, 92, style, frequency, time); is not owned by me. chart() is from util class. above snippet works fine with break point. But when I remove the breakpoint it starts going in "if" block always. Hows can I solve this issue.

    Read the article

  • How to protect and hidden form HTML/PHP with JS callback to AS3

    - by Jk_
    Hi guys, I'm developing a Flash website (as3) where I need to be able to upload directly to YouTube by using the DATA API. However in order to do so, I had to use a proper HTML form on top of my flash object. Why? Because of the Browser Based Upload restictions. I first hide the form using JQuery and with a little CSS the form is display just where I want it. Within flash I use ExternalInterface.call() to show/hide the form when I need it! ExternalInterface.call("YTUploader.showIt"); The upload process is working great my only problem is that the form can be displayed easily... You just need a tool like firebug and you can use the form wherever you want on my flash app. So I was wandering which will be the best way to 'protect' this form or the best way to limit its access. Any advices will be appreciated. Thanks for your time. Jk.

    Read the article

  • jQuery: How to reverse sortable('serialize') arrays from last to first?

    - by Binyamin
    The discussion begins http://stackoverflow.com/questions/654535/jquery-what-to-do-with-the-list-that-sortableserialize-returns/2920760#2920760 How to reverse it from last to first, updateList.php?id[]=5&id[]=4&id[]=3&id[]=2&id[]=1&&action=update? <ul> <li id="oreder-5">5</li> <li id="oreder-4">4</li> <li id="oreder-3">3</li> <li id="oreder-2">2</li> <li id="oreder-1">1</li> <ul> My code: $(document).ready(function(){ order=[]; $('#list ul').children('li').each(function(idx, elm) { order.push(elm.id.split('-')[1]) }); $.post('updateList.php', {'order[]': order, action: 'update'}); function slideout(){ setTimeout(function(){ $("#response").slideUp("slow", function () {}); }, 2000); } $("#response").hide(); $(function() { $("#list ul").sortable({ opacity: 0.8, cursor: 'move', update: function() { var order = $(this).sortable("serialize") + '&action=update'; $.post("updateList.php", order, function(theResponse){ $("#response").html(theResponse); $("#response").slideDown('slow'); slideout(); }); }}); }); });

    Read the article

  • Help me make a jquery AJAXed divs' links work like an iframe.

    - by Dave
    I want to make a few divs on the same page work similar to iframes. Each will load a URL which contains links. When you click on those links I want an AJAX request to go out and replace the div's html with new html from the page of the clicked link. It will be very similar to surfing a page inside an iframe. Here is my code to initially load the divs (this code works): onload: $.ajax({ url: "http://www.foo.com/videos.php", cache: false, success: function(html){ $("#HowToVideos").replaceWith(html); } }); $.ajax({ url: "http://www.foo.com/projects.php", cache: false, success: function(html){ $("#HowToProjects").replaceWith(html); } }); This is a sample of code that I'm not quite sure how to implement but explains the concept. Could I get some help with some selectors(surround in ?'s) and or let me know what is the correct way of doing this? I also want to display a loading icon, which I need to know where the right place to place the function is. $(".ajaxarea a").click(function(){ var linksURL = this.href; // var ParentingAjaxArea = $(this).closest(".ajaxarea");; $.ajax({ url: linksURL, cache: false, success: function(html){ $(ParentingAjaxArea).replaceWith(html); } }); return false; }); $(".ajaxarea").ajaxStart(function(){ // show loading icon });

    Read the article

  • jquery form validation, and submit-on-change

    - by Bee
    I want to make all my settings forms across my site confirm that changes are saved, kinda like facebook does if you make changes in a form and then try to navigate away without saving. So I'm disabling the submit button on the forms only enabling if the values change. I then prompt the user to hit save before they leave the page in the case that they do have changes pending. var form = $('form.edit'); if(form.length > 0) { var orig_str = form.serialize(); $(':submit',form).attr('disabled','disabled'); form.on('change keyup', function(){ if(form.serialize() == orig_str) { setConfirmUnload(false); $(':submit',form).attr('disabled','disabled'); } else { setConfirmUnload(true); $(':submit',form).removeAttr('disabled') } }); $('input[type=submit]').click(function(){ setConfirmUnload(false); }); } function setConfirmUnload(on) { window.onbeforeunload = (on) ? unloadMessage : null; } function unloadMessage() { return 'If you navigate away from this page without saving your changes, they will be lost.'; } One of these forms needs some additional validation which I do using jQuery.validate library. e.g. if i wanted to ensure the user can't double submit the form on accident by double clicking on submit or somesuch (the actual validation in question is for a credit-card form and not this simple): $('form').validate({ submitHandler: function(form) { $(':submit', form).attr('disabled','disabled'); form.submit(); } }); Unfortunately both bits are trying to bind to submit button and they're interfering with each other such that the submit button remains disabled no matter what I do and it is impossible to submit the form at all. Is there some way to chain the validations together or something? Or some other way to avoid re-writing the validation code to repeat the "did you change anything in the form" business?

    Read the article

  • jQuery: How to remove this code redundancy?

    - by Mark
    clone.find('[id]').each(function() { id = $(this).attr('id'); ind = id.search(/\d+$/); $(this).attr('id', id.substr(0,ind)+id_counter); }); clone.find('[for]').each(function() { id = $(this).attr('for'); ind = id.search(/\d+$/); $(this).attr('for', id.substr(0,ind)+id_counter); }); I know I can find elements that have either the id attribute or the for attribute, but then how do I know which one I need to set?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581  | Next Page >