Search Results

Search found 27530 results on 1102 pages for 'sql truncate'.

Page 580/1102 | < Previous Page | 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587  | Next Page >

  • Mysql query problem....

    - by Avinash
    I have below values in my database. been Lorem Ipsum and scrambled ever scrambledtexttextofandtooktooktypetexthastheunknownspecimenstandardsincetypesett Here is my query: SELECT nBusinessAdID, MATCH (`sHeadline`) AGAINST ("text" IN BOOLEAN MODE) AS score FROM wiki_businessads WHERE MATCH (`sHeadline`) AGAINST ("text" IN BOOLEAN MODE) AND bDeleted ="0" AND nAdStatus ="1" ORDER BY score DESC, bPrimeListing DESC, dDateCreated DESC It's not fetching first result, why? It should fetch first result because its contain text word in it. I have disabled the stopword filtering. This one is also not working SELECT nBusinessAdID, MATCH (`sHeadline`) AGAINST ('"text"' IN BOOLEAN MODE) AS score FROM wiki_businessads WHERE MATCH (`sHeadline`) AGAINST ('"text"' IN BOOLEAN MODE) AND bDeleted ="0" AND nAdStatus ="1" ORDER BY score DESC, bPrimeListing DESC, dDateCreated DESC Thanks Avinash

    Read the article

  • Optimize this MySQL query?

    - by HipHop-opatamus
    The following query takes FOREVER to execute (30+ hrs on a Macbook w/4gig ram) - I'm looking for ways to make it run more efficiently. Any thoughts are appreciated! CREATE TABLE fc AS SELECT threadid, title, body, date, userlogin FROM f WHERE pid NOT IN (SELECT pid FROM ft) ORDER BY date; (table "f" is ~1 Gig / 1,843,000 row, table "ft" is 168mb, 216,000 rows) )

    Read the article

  • Using/Calling a cursor in another cursor - PL/Sql

    - by Cindy
    I have a function with a cursor which returns an ID. I need to get some fields in another cursor using this ID result from the first cursor. So my first cursor is: CREATE OR REPLACE function get_id(id number) CURSOR child_id IS SELECT table1_id FROM table1,child WHERE child_id = id AND table1_id = child_chld_id; Ideally my second cursor should be: cursor grandchild_id is select table1_id from table1,child where child_id = (return value of id from cursor child_id) and table1_id = child_chld_id; How do I do this?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Reporting Services proxy timeout (ASP.NET)

    - by Philip
    Morning, We are using SSRS (2005) and have a ASP.NET frontend using the SSRS WebControl. I've boiled the problem down the time it takes for one particular report to be generated is greater than the timeout on the proxy server. It looks like the way the SSRS web control tries to do things is by performing an HTTP request for the report, however the problem with this is the request can timeout potentially before the report has generated. Looking at the HTTP traffic the response is a 504 (gateway timeout). Is there a way to increase the timeout or change SSRS WebControl to use more robust polling mechanism (which isn't dependant on the timeout of the HTTP request). I could be wrong but I don't think ServerReport.Timeout property would resolve the issue we are seeing? Any thoughts? Philip

    Read the article

  • Row as XML in SP

    - by user171523
    From SP i need to get a row as as XML (Includeing all fileds.) Is there any way we can get like below. Declare @xmlMsg varchar(4000) select * into #tempTable from dbo.order for xml raw select @xmlMsg = 1 from #tempTable print '@xmlMsg' + @xmlMsg Row i would like to get it as XML output.

    Read the article

  • How can I write query to output this format in SQLite?

    - by GivenPie
    I would like to output in this format: e.EE_id e.FNAME e.LNAME SUPer_id s.FNAME s.LNAME --- --------- -------------- --- ------------- ------------------- 1 Ziqiao Li 2 Charlie Li 1 Ziqiao Li 3 George Pee 2 Charlie Li 4 Jason Dee 2 Charlie Li 5 Petey Wee 2 Charlie Li From this table created : I need to display the Primary key and foreign key in the same results while displaying the foreign key name values for the primary key names. Create table Employees( ee_id integer, fname varchar(20), lname varchar(20), super_id integer, Constraint emp_Pk Primary Key (ee_id), Constraint emp_Fk Foreign Key (super_id) references employees (ee_id) ); INSERT INTO Employees VALUES(1,'Charlie','Li',null); INSERT INTO Employees VALUES(2,'Ziqiao','Lee',1); INSERT INTO Employees VALUES(3,'George','Pee',2); INSERT INTO Employees VALUES(4,'Jason','Dee',2); INSERT INTO Employees VALUES(5,'Petey','Wee',2); Select ee_id, fname, lname, super_id from employees; ee_id fname lname super_id ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 1 Charlie Li 2 Ziqiao Lee 1 3 George Pee 2 4 Jason Dee 2 5 Petey Wee 2 Do I need to create a view?

    Read the article

  • How to make a GRANT persist for a table that's being dropped and re-created?

    - by Eli Courtwright
    I'm on a fairly new project where we're still modifying the design of our Oracle 11g database tables. As such, we drop and re-create our tables fairly often to make sure that our table creation scripts work as expected whenever we make a change. Our database consists of 2 schemas. One schema has some tables with INSERT triggers which cause the data to sometimes be copied into tables in our second schema. This requires us to log into the database with an admin account such as sysdba and GRANT access to the first schema to the necessary tables on the second schema, e.g. GRANT ALL ON schema_two.SomeTable TO schema_one; Our problem is that every time we make a change to our database design and want to drop and re-create our database tables, the access we GRANT-ed to schema_one went away when the table was dropped. Thus, this creates another annoying step wherein we must log in with an admin account to re-GRANT the access every time one of these tables is dropped and re-created. This isn't a huge deal, but I'd love to eliminate as many steps as possible from our development and testing procedures. Is there any way to GRANT access to a table in such a way that the GRANT-ed permissions survive a table being dropped and then re-created? And if this isn't possible, then is there a better way to go about this?

    Read the article

  • Concatenation of fields in different rows

    - by spender
    I'm stuck on an aggregation problem that I can't get to the bottom of. I have some data which is best summarized as follows id |phraseId|seqNum|word ========================= 1 |1 |1 |hello 2 |1 |2 |world 3 |2 |1 |black 4 |2 |2 |and 5 |2 |3 |white I'd like a query that gives back the following data: phraseId|completePhrase ======================== 1 |hello world 2 |black and white Anyone?

    Read the article

  • Should i really use integer primary IDs?

    - by arthurprs
    For example, i always generate an auto-increment field for the users table, but i also specifies an UNIQUE index on their usernames. There is situations that i first need to get the userId for a given username and then execute the desired query. Or use a JOIN in the desired query. It's 2 trips to the database or a JOIN vs. a varchar index The above is just an example There is a real performance benefit on INT over small VARCHAR indexes? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • I do I iterate the records in a database using LINQ when I have already built the LINQ DB code?

    - by Seth Spearman
    I asked on SO a few days ago what was the simplest quickest way to build a wrapper around a recently completed database. I took the advice and used sqlmetal to build linq classes around my database design. Now I am having two problems. One, I don't know LINQ. And, two, I have been shocked to realize how hard it is to learn. I have a book on LINQ (Linq In Action by Manning) and it has helped some but at the end of the day it is going to take me a couple of weeks to get traction and I need to make some progress on my project today. So, I am looking for some help getting started. Click HERE To see my simple database schema. Click HERE to see the vb class that was generated for the schema. My needs are simple. I have a console app. The main table is the SupplyModel table. Most of the other tables are child tables of the SupplyModel table. I want to iterate through each of Supply Model records. I want to grab the data for a supply model and then DoStuff with the data. And I also need to iterate through the child records, for each supply model, for example the NumberedInventories and DoStuff with that as well. I want to only iterate the SupplyModels that are have IDs that are in an array of strings containing the IDs. I need help doing this in VB rather than C# if possible. Thanks for your help. Seth

    Read the article

  • Two n x m relationships with the same table in mysql

    - by Christian
    I want to create a database in which there's an n x m relationship between the table drug and the table article and an n x m relationship between the table target and the table article. I get the error: Cannot delete or update a parent row: a foreign key constraint fails What do I have to change in my code? DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `textmine`.`article`; CREATE TABLE `textmine`.`article` ( `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT COMMENT 'Pubmed ID', `abstract` blob NOT NULL, `authors` blob NOT NULL, `journal` varchar(256) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `textmine`.`drugs`; CREATE TABLE `textmine`.`drugs` ( `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL COMMENT 'This ID is taken from the biosemantics dictionary', `primaryName` varchar(256) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `textmine`.`targets`; CREATE TABLE `textmine`.`targets` ( `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `primaryName` varchar(256) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `textmine`.`containstarget`; CREATE TABLE `textmine`.`containstarget` ( `targetid` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, `articleid` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, KEY `target` (`targetid`), KEY `article` (`articleid`), CONSTRAINT `article` FOREIGN KEY (`articleid`) REFERENCES `article` (`id`), CONSTRAINT `target` FOREIGN KEY (`targetid`) REFERENCES `targets` (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `textmine`.`contiansdrug`; CREATE TABLE `textmine`.`contiansdrug` ( `drugid` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, `articleid` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, KEY `drug` (`drugid`), KEY `article` (`articleid`), CONSTRAINT `article` FOREIGN KEY (`articleid`) REFERENCES `article` (`id`), CONSTRAINT `drug` FOREIGN KEY (`drugid`) REFERENCES `drugs` (`id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;

    Read the article

  • Convert Normalize table to Unormalize table

    - by M R Jafari
    I have tow tables, Table A has 3 columns as StudentID, Name, Course, ClassID and Table B has many columns as StudentID, Name, Other1, Other2, Other3 ... I want convert Table A to Table B. Please help me! Table A StudentID Name Course ClassID 85001 David Data Base 11 85001 David Data Structure 22 85002 Bob Math 33 85002 Bob Data Base 44 85002 Bob Data Structure 55 85002 Bob C# 66 85003 Sara C# 77 85003 Sara Data Base 88 85004 Mary Math 99 85005 Mary Math 100 … Table B SdentdID Name Other 1 Other 2 Other 3 Other 4 … 85001 David DBase,11 DS,22 85002 Bob Math,33 DB,44 DS,55 C#,66 85003 Sara C#,77 DBase,88 85004 Mary Math,99

    Read the article

  • Select newly added Row - DataGridView and BindingSource

    - by Ruben Trancoso
    I'm adding a new Row to a BindingSource that is Bound to a DataGridView source.AddNew(); After this, use BindingSource to get the newly added row is return the next row in the DataGridView when its sorted. ROW "A" ROW "B" <- myBindingSource.AddNew(); ROW "C" myBindingSource.Current gives ROW "C". (it became the selected row in the DataGridView) I need this because I want to update just the newly added row DataRowView drv = (DataRowView)myBindingSource.Current; myTableAdapter.Update(drv.Row); and not the entire table. myTableAdapter.Update(myDataSet.myTable); and also, I would like to have this newly added line selected in the DataGridView after insertion. is it possible in some way?

    Read the article

  • Do connection string DNS lookups get cached?

    - by joshcomley
    Suppose the following: I have a database set up on database.mywebsite.com, which resolves to IP 111.111.1.1, running from a local DNS server on our network. I have countless ASP, ASP.NET and WinForms applications that use a connection string utilising database.mywebsite.com as the server name, all running from the internal network. Then the box running the database dies, and I switch over to a new box with an IP of 222.222.2.2. So, I update the DNS for database.mywebsite.com to point to 222.222.2.2. Will all the applications and computers running them have cached the old resolved IP address? I'm assuming they will have. Any suggestions along the lines of "don't have your IP change each time you switch box" are not too welcome as I cannot control this aspect of the situation, unfortunately. We are currently using the machine name of the box, which changes every time it dies and all apps etc. have to be updated with the new machine name. It hurts.

    Read the article

  • get column names from a table where one of the column name is a key word.

    - by syedsaleemss
    Im using c# .net windows form application. I have created a database which has many tables. In one of the tables I have entered data. In this table I have 4 columns named key, name,age,value. Here the name "key" of the first column is a key word. Now I am trying to get these column names into a combo box. I am unable to get the name "key". It works for "key" when I use this code: private void comboseccolumn_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { string dbname = combodatabase.SelectedItem.ToString(); string path = @"Data Source=" + textBox1.Text + ";Initial Catalog=" + dbname + ";Integrated Security=SSPI"; //string path=@"Data Source=SYED-PC\SQLEXPRESS;Initial Catalog=resources;Integrated Security=SSPI"; SqlConnection con = new SqlConnection(path); string tablename = comboBox2.SelectedItem.ToString(); //string query= "Select * from" +tablename+; //SqlDataAdapter adp = new SqlDataAdapter(" Select [Key] ,value from " + tablename, con); SqlDataAdapter adp = new SqlDataAdapter(" Select [" + combofirstcolumn.SelectedItem.ToString() + "]," + comboseccolumn.SelectedItem.ToString() + "\t from " + tablename, con); DataTable dt = new DataTable(); adp.Fill(dt); dataGridView1.DataSource = dt; } This is beacuse I am using "[" in the select query. But it wont work for non keys. Or if I remove the "[" it is not working for key . Please suggest me so that I can get both key as well as nonkey column names.

    Read the article

  • SqlCeResultSet re-use

    - by pdiddy
    Can I reuse an existing result set to filter? Lets say I have a result set that contains all data. Then I want to filter that resultset. Can I just execute the sqlcommand on the same resultset? I tried and it didn't seem to work. Does someone know the reason? So the only way to make it work was to create a new resultset and execute the command on that one. So this way I'm always creating a new resulset, can this have some issue?

    Read the article

  • How do you tell if your migrations are up to date with migratordotnet?

    - by Lance Fisher
    I'm using migratordotnet to manage my database migrations. I'm running them on application setup like this, but I would also like to check on application startup that the migrations are up to date, and provide the option to migrate to latest. How do I tell if there are available migrations that need to be applied? I see that I can get the migrations that were applied like this var asm = Assembly.GetAssembly(typeof(Migration_0001)); var migrator = new Migrator.Migrator("SqlServer", setupInfo.DatabaseConnectionString, asm); var applied = migrator.AppliedMigrations; I like to do something like this: var available = migrator.AvailableMigrations; //this property does not exist.

    Read the article

  • Is possible to reuse subqueries?

    - by Gothmog
    Hello, I'm having some problems trying to perform a query. I have two tables, one with elements information, and another one with records related with the elements of the first table. The idea is to get in the same row the element information plus several records information. Structure could be explain like this: table [ id, name ] [1, '1'], [2, '2'] table2 [ id, type, value ] [1, 1, '2009-12-02'] [1, 2, '2010-01-03'] [1, 4, '2010-01-03'] [2, 1, '2010-01-02'] [2, 2, '2010-01-02'] [2, 2, '2010-01-03'] [2, 3, '2010-01-07'] [2, 4, '2010-01-07'] And this is want I would like to achieve: result [id, name, Column1, Column2, Column3, Column4] [1, '1', '2009-12-02', '2010-01-03', , '2010-01-03'] [2, '2', '2010-01-02', '2010-01-02', '2010-01-07', '2010-01-07'] The following query gets the proper result, but it seems to me extremely inefficient, having to iterate table2 for each column. Would be possible in anyway to do a subquery and reuse it? SELECT a.id, a.name, (select min(value) from table2 t where t.id = subquery.id and t.type = 1 group by t.type) as Column1, (select min(value) from table2 t where t.id = subquery.id and t.type = 2 group by t.type) as Column2, (select min(value) from table2 t where t.id = subquery.id and t.type = 3 group by t.type) as Column3, (select min(value) from table2 t where t.id = subquery.id and t.type = 4 group by t.type) as Column4 FROM (SELECT distinct id FROM table2 t WHERE (t.type in (1, 2, 3, 4)) AND t.value between '2010-01-01' and '2010-01-07') as subquery LEFT JOIN table a ON a.id = subquery.id

    Read the article

  • How to ignore blank elements in linq query

    - by Maestro1024
    How to ignore blank elements in linq query I have a linq query var usersInDatabase = from user in licenseUserTable where user.FirstName == first_name && user.LastName == last_name select user; But if I get here and first_name or last_name is blank then I want to still evaluate the other data item.

    Read the article

  • sorting two tables (full join)

    - by Ruslan
    i'm joining tables like: select * from tableA a full join tableB b on a.id = b.id But the output should be: row without null fields row with null fields in tableB row with null fields in tableA Like: a.id a.name b.id b.name 5 Peter 5 Jones 2 Steven 2 Pareker 6 Paul null null 4 Ivan null null null null 1 Smith null null 3 Parker

    Read the article

  • SqlServer2008 - Can I Alter a Scalar Function while it is referenced in many places

    - by Casey C.
    We have a scalar function that returns a DateTime. It performs a couple of quick table selects to get its return value. This function is already in use throughout the database - in default constraints, stored procs, etc. I would like to change the implementation of the function (to remove the table hits and make it more efficient) but apparently I can't do that while it is referenced by other objects in the database. Will I actually need to update every object in the database that references it to remove the reference, update the function and then update all those objects to restore the reference to the function? Thanks for any insight you can give.

    Read the article

  • Rows dropping when I try to join data from two tables

    - by blcArmadillo
    I have a fairly simple query I'm try to write. If I run the following query: SELECT parts.id, parts.type_id FROM parts WHERE parts.type_id=1 OR parts.type_id=2 OR parts.type_id=4 ORDER BY parts.type_id; I get all the rows I expect to be returned. Now when I try to grab the parent_unit from another table with the following query six rows suddenly drop out of the result: SELECT parts.id, parts.type_id, sp.parent_unit FROM parts, serialized_parts sp WHERE (parts.type_id=1 OR parts.type_id=2 OR parts.type_id=4) AND sp.parts_id = parts.id ORDER BY parts.type_id In the past I've never really dealt with ORs in my queries so maybe I'm just doing it wrong. That said I'm guessing it's just a simple mistake. Let me know if you need sample data and I'll post some. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Firing trigger for bulk insert

    - by Deepa
    ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[TR_O_SALESMAN_INS] ON [dbo].[O_SALESMAN] AFTER INSERT AS BEGIN -- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from -- interfering with SELECT statements. SET NOCOUNT ON; -- Insert statements for trigger here DECLARE @SLSMAN_CD NVARCHAR(20) DECLARE @SLSMAN_NAME NVARCHAR(20) SELECT @SLSMAN_CD = SLSMAN_CD,@SLSMAN_NAME=SLSMAN_NAME FROM INSERTED IF NOT EXISTS(SELECT * FROM O_SALESMAN_USER WHERE SLSMAN_CD = @SLSMAN_CD) BEGIN INSERT INTO O_SALESMAN_USER(SLSMAN_CD, PASSWORD, USER_CD) VALUES(@SLSMAN_CD, @SLSMAN_CD,@SLSMAN_NAME ) END END This is the trigger written for a table(O_SALESMAN) to fetch few columns from it and insert it into one another table(O_SALESMAN_USER). Presently bulk data is getting inserted into O_SALESMAN table through a stored procedure, where as the trigger is getting fired only once and O_SALESMAN_USER is having only one record inserted each time whenever the stored procedure is being executed,i want trigger to run after each and every record that gets inserted into O_SALESMAN such that both tables should have same count which is not happening..so please let me know what can be modified in this Trigger to achieve the same....

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587  | Next Page >