Search Results

Search found 2479 results on 100 pages for 'operator'.

Page 60/100 | < Previous Page | 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67  | Next Page >

  • How can I perform an idiomatic non-recursive flatten in ruby?

    - by nasmorn
    I have a method that returns an array of arrays. For convenience I use collect on a collection to gather them together. arr = collection.collect {|item| item.get_array_of_arrays} Now I would like to have a single array that contains all the arrays. Of course I can loop over the array and use the + operator to do that. newarr = [] arr.each {|item| newarr += item} But this is kind of ugly, is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • Filter tweets by client name

    - by Ido Shilon
    I'm trying to filter tweets results by client name like - using source operator. I'm trying to do it with a a client named "single platform" , to get tweets like http://twitter.com/#!/phoenixparknyc/status/43340419475570688 but the search doesn't seems to work (tried with quotes as well) http://twitter.com/#!/search/source%3Asingle%20platform%20Specials%2FEvents%20 Any idea how to make the search works ?

    Read the article

  • K/APL style programming in C++?

    - by anon
    I'm writing code in C++, but I really like K/APL's array-oriented style. Does anyone know of a good set of operator overloading tricks / macros / ... to allow some K/APL -style programming in C++? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Is there a way to combine IN and LIKE in MySQL?

    - by abeger
    I'm currently running a query like this: SELECT * FROM email WHERE email_address LIKE 'ajones@%' OR email_address LIKE 'bsmith@%' OR email_address LIKE 'cjohnson@%' The large number of OR's bothers me. Is there a way to condense this up with something akin to an IN operator, e.g.: SELECT * FROM email WHERE email_address LIKE ('ajones@%', 'bsmith@%', 'cjohnson@%') Or is this just wishful thinking?

    Read the article

  • How to implement == or >= operators for generic type

    - by momsd
    I have a generic type Foo which has a internal generic class Boo. Boo class a property Value of type K. In a method inside Foo i want to do a boo.Value >= value Note that second operand value is of type T. while compiling i am getting following error: Operator '=' cannot be applied to operands of type 'T' and 'T' Can anyone please tell me whats the problem here?

    Read the article

  • extract/slice/reorder lists in (emacs) lisp?

    - by Stephen
    In python, you might do something like i = (0, 3, 2) x = [x+1 for x in range(0,5)] operator.itemgetter(*i)(x) to get (1, 4, 3). In (emacs) lisp, I wrote this function called extract which does something similar, (defun extract (elems seq) (mapcar (lambda (x) (nth x seq)) elems)) (extract '(0 3 2) (number-sequence 1 5)) but I feel like there should be something built in? All I know is first, last, rest, nth, car, cdr... What's the way to go? ~ Thanks in advance ~

    Read the article

  • [game] How to write ::: in cpp and ??? in c#?

    - by daveny
    These questions are a kind of game, and I did not find the solution for them. It is possible to write ::: in Cpp without using "" or anything like this and the compiler will accept it. (macro-s are prohibited too) And the same is true for C# too, but in C#, you have to write ???. I think Cpp will use the :: scope operator and C# will use '? :' , but I do not know the answers to them. Any idea?

    Read the article

  • Which is clearer form: if(!value) or if(flag == value) ?

    - by CodexArcanum
    I understand this is a subjective question, so I apologize if it needs to be closed, but I feel like it comes up often enough for me to wonder if there is a general preference for one form over the other. Obviously, the best answer is "refactor the code so you don't need to test for falsehood" but sometimes there's no easy way to do so and the "else" branch is simply to continue processing. So when you must have an "if not false" construct, which is the preferred standard: The not operator if(!value) Or the test for false if(value == false)

    Read the article

  • LINQ expression until to break a string

    - by wonea
    Using LINQ I'm looking to break down the following path string[], however I'd like to break it up to the point of the Binn folder. Is there a WHERE UNTIL operator in LINQ? c:\ Program Files\ Microsoft SQL Server\ MSSQL10.SQLEXPRESS\ MSSQL\ Binn\ sqlservr.exe What I'd like todo var words = from word in thepath where UNTIL thepath == "Binn" select word;

    Read the article

  • why inner class doesn't compile..?

    - by Vincenzo
    This is my code: #include <algorithm> class A { void f() { struct CompareMe { bool operator() (int i, int j) { return i < j; } } comp; int a[] = {1, 2, 3, 4}; int found = std::min_element(a[0], a[3], comp); } } Error message: no matching function for call to ‘min_element(int&, int&, A::f()::CompareMe&) What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • list of pointers in c++

    - by pavlos
    What i want to do is for (list<cPacket *>::iterator i = cache.begin(); i != cache.end(); i++){ if( strcmp(i->getName(),id) == 0 ){ return true; } } where getName is function of the class cPacket, But it does not work, i tries also i.operator->()->getName(), and again nothing. Can anybody help me?

    Read the article

  • C++: ptr->hello(); /* VERSUS */ (*ptr).hello();

    - by Joey
    i was learning about c++ pointers... so the "-" operator seemed strange to me... instead of ptr-hello(); one could write (*ptr).hello(); because it also seems to work, so i thought the former is just a more convenient way is that the case or is there any difference?

    Read the article

  • Why do I need an intermediate conversion to go from struct to decimal, but not struct to int?

    - by Jesse McGrew
    I have a struct like this, with an explicit conversion to float: struct TwFix32 { public static explicit operator float(TwFix32 x) { ... } } I can convert a TwFix32 to int with a single explicit cast: (int)fix32 But to convert it to decimal, I have to use two casts: (decimal)(float)fix32 There is no implicit conversion from float to either int or decimal. Why does the compiler let me omit the intermediate cast to float when I'm going to int, but not when I'm going to decimal?

    Read the article

  • What does =*> mean with regards to context free grammars?

    - by incrediman
    I've been reading a couple books/online references about compiler theory, and keep seeing that particular operator coming up every once in a while (as seen here), specifically when the current topic is context free grammars. What does it mean? As well, how does it differ from =>? Explanations with examples distinguishing => from =*> would be most helpful.

    Read the article

  • c#: adding two strings

    - by every_answer_gets_a_point
    i am doing: html = new WebClient().DownloadString("http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=" + biocompany); and i am getting the error: Error 1 Operator '&' cannot be applied to operands of type 'string' and 'string' but i am not even using the & ! please help!

    Read the article

  • Can I use "map" as a substitute for "for each"/"for in"?

    - by John Mee
    For a little while now javascript has the "map" function to loop over arrays. It appears possible to use it as a 'foreach' operator for example: var arr = ['a','b','c'] var doubles = arr.map(function(val){ return val + val }) Is this better or worse than saying for(var i in arr){ ... 50/50: saves having to use the index but adds a callback; it doesn't seem very common so I hesitate to use it but still want to.

    Read the article

  • How to process this string via regular expression

    - by iiduce
    my string style like this: expression1/field1+expression2*expression3+expression4/field2*expression5*expression6/field3 a real style mybe like this: computer/(100)+web*mail+explorer/(200)*bbs*solution/(300) "+" and "*" represent operator "computer","web"...represent expression (100),(200) represent field num . field num may not exist. I want process the string to this: /(100)+web*+explorer/(200)bbs/(300) rules like this: if expression length is more than 3 and its field is not (200), then add brackets to it.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67  | Next Page >