Search Results

Search found 54190 results on 2168 pages for 'http authentication'.

Page 61/2168 | < Previous Page | 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68  | Next Page >

  • if I set up the expire http header of a css file to 1 year, if I modify that file, will it be ignore

    - by user39511
    I'm using rails with nginx/passenger. If I set up the expire http header of a css file to 1 year, if I modify that file, will it be ignored by the browser (ie, it will not request the new version)? Given that Rails adds a different timestamps to each asset such as foo.css?1270165626 every time I restart the server? That's the config I use right now (nginx/passenger): location ~* \.(ico|css|js|gif|jpe?g|png)(\?[0-9]+)?$ { expires max; break; }

    Read the article

  • How to disable authentication schemes for WCF Data Services

    - by Schneider
    When I deployed my WCF Data Services to production hosting I started to get the following error (or similar depending on which auth schemes are active): IIS specified authentication schemes 'Basic, Anonymous', but the binding only supports specification of exactly one authentication scheme. Valid authentication schemes are Digest, Negotiate, NTLM, Basic, or Anonymous. Change the IIS settings so that only a single authentication scheme is used. Apparently WCF Data Services (WCF in general?) cannot handle having more than once authentication scheme active. OK so I am aware that I can disable all-but-one authentication scheme on the web application via IIS control panel .... via a support request!! Is there a way to specify a single authentication scheme on a per-service level in the web.config? I thought this might be as straight forward as making a change to <system.serviceModel> but... it turns out that WCF Data Services do not configure themselves in the web config. If you look at the DataService<> class it does not implement a [ServiceContract] hence you cannot refer to it in the <service><endpoint>...which I presume would be needed for changing its configuration via XML. P.S. Our host is using II6, but both solutions for IIS6 & IIS7 appreciated.

    Read the article

  • JAX-RS --- How to return JSON and HTTP Status code together?

    - by masato-san
    I'm writing REST web app (Netbean6.9, JAX-RS, Toplink-essential) and trying to return JSON and Http status code. I have code ready and working just to return JSON when HTTP GET Method is called from client. Code snippet @Path("get/id") @GET @Produces("application/json") public M_?? getMachineToUpdate(@PathParam("id") String id) { //some code to return JSON . . return myJson But I also want to return HTTP status code (500, 200, 204 etc) along with returning JSON. I tried using HttpServletResponse object, response.sendError("error message", 500); But this made browser to think it's real 500 so output web page was regular Http 500 error page. What I want to is just to return status code so that my Javascript on client side can handle some logic depending on what HTTP status code is returned. (maybe just to display the error code and message on html page.) Is it possible to do so? or should HTTP status code not be used for such thing?

    Read the article

  • File upload fails when user is authenticated. Using IIS7 Integrated mode.

    - by Nikkelmann
    These are the user identities my website tells me that it uses: Logged on: NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE (Can not write any files at all) and Not logged on: WSW32\IUSR_77 (Can write files to any folder) I have a ASP.NET 4.0 website on a shared hosting IIS7 web server running in Integrated mode with 32-bit applications support enabled and MSSQL 2008. Using classic mode is not an option since I need to secure some static files and I use Routing. In my web.config file I have set the following: <system.webServer> <modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true" /> </system.webServer> My hosting company says that Impersonation is enabled by default on machine level, so this is not something I can change. I asked their support and they referred me to this article: http://www.codinghub.net/2010/08/differences-between-integrated-mode-and.html Citing this part: Different windows identity in Forms authentication When Forms Authentication is used by an application and anonymous access is allowed, the Integrated mode identity differs from the Classic mode identity in the following ways: * ServerVariables["LOGON_USER"] is filled. * Request.LogognUserIdentity uses the credentials of the [NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE] account instead of the [NT AUTHORITY\INTERNET USER] account. This behavior occurs because authentication is performed in a single stage in Integrated mode. Conversely, in Classic mode, authentication occurs first with IIS 7.0 using anonymous access, and then with ASP.NET using Forms authentication. Thus, the result of the authentication is always a single user-- the Forms authentication user. AUTH_USER/LOGON_USER returns this same user because the Forms authentication user credentials are synchronized between IIS 7.0 and ASP.NET. A side effect is that LOGON_USER, HttpRequest.LogonUserIdentity, and impersonation no longer can access the Anonymous user credentials that IIS 7.0 would have authenticated by using Classic mode. How do I set up my website so that it can use the proper identity with the proper permissions? I've looked high and low for any answers regarding this specific problem, but found nil so far... I hope you can help!

    Read the article

  • Membership e Authentication no ASP.NET 4.5

    - by renatohaddad
    Vejam que boa notícia. Para quem desenvolve em asp.net e usa autenticação com membership terá uma grande novidade na hora de autenticar. Na versão 4.5 poderemos autenticar o usuário usando a rede social, ou seja, o login poderá ser feito usando os serviços do Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Twitter e Windows Live. Isto tudo será possível pq teremos novos providers OAuth e OpenID para authentication.1.No site "developer website for Windows Live, Facebook, or Twitter", crie uma app e registre uma chave (key=minhaChave) com o valor "curso asp.net 4.5".2. No seu site altere o arquivo _AppStart.cshtml e crie o código do provider do Facebook:OAuthWebSecurity.RegisterOAuthClient(     BuiltInOAuthClient.Facebook, consumerKey: "", minhaChave: "");3. No arquivo ~/Account/Login.cshtml descomente o bloco do fieldset para habilitar o provider.<fieldset>     <legend>Log in using another service</legend>     <input type="submit" name="provider" id="facebook"value="Facebook"         title="Log in using your Facebook account." />     <input type="submit" name="provider" id="twitter" value="Twitter"         title="Log in using your Twitter account." />     <input type="submit" name="provider" id="windowsLive"         value="WindowsLive"         title="Log in using your Windows Live account." /> </fieldset>4. Por fim, no arquivo ~/Account/AssociateServiceAccount.cshtml descomente o bloco do fieldset e pronto, na autenticação serão exibidos todos os providers.

    Read the article

  • Twitter "Authentication Error" Turpial & Choqok (latest versions)

    - by PineMarten
    I use Turpial a lot, but Turpial isn't connecting at all. I can still connect to Twitter thru the OS app (no issues signing in through Online Accounts) and of course I can still sign in using the browser, but Turpial gives me an "Authentication Error" and Choqok fails to do anything. I've tried changing my password, revoking the Turpial and Ubuntu apps in Twitter and re-enabling them, but then it gives me an "Invalid Credentials" message. I've even removed and installed Turpial multiple times, still nothing. I can't find any information or resources for this type of error from Turpial online. I think it may be something recent after finding this message elsewhere: (article related to "Birdie") It looks promising i'm currently using it atm, since all the other twitter clients no longer work due to the API 1.0 shutdown (posted today) I've never used Choqok before today, so I don't even know if I've set it up properly. It's failing to retrieve or send Tweets it just blank screens, but at least it signs in. I've figured that this isn't an issue with Ubuntu, or Turpial or Choqok, or the router (already replaced it today), so I don't really know what I'm dealing with here. I hope it's not another API issue, Facebook did something similar just a few weeks ago

    Read the article

  • Protecting a webpage with an authentication form

    - by Luke
    I have created an employee webpage with a lot of company info, links, etc., but I want to protect the page because it contains some confidential company information. I am running IIS7.5 on Windows Server 2008 R2, and I already have the site setup as a normal, non-protected site. I want all active directory users to have access to the site. This is not an intranet site, it is exposed to the internet. I tried setting it up using Windows Authentication, but I had problems with multiple login prompts, etc. I just want a simple form for users to enter their credentials and have access to the site, and I need it to query the AD for login. I've searched the web for a guide on this, but I can't seem to find one that fits my situation. This is not a Web App. It is just a simple html site. Does anyone have any suggestions or a link to a guide on this? Thanks so much! -LB

    Read the article

  • Which HTTP redirect status code is best for this REST API scenario?

    - by Aseem Kishore
    I'm working on a REST API. The key objects ("nouns") are "items", and each item has a unique ID. E.g. to get info on the item with ID foo: GET http://api.example.com/v1/item/foo New items can be created, but the client doesn't get to pick the ID. Instead, the client sends some info that represents that item. So to create a new item: POST http://api.example.com/v1/item/ hello=world&hokey=pokey With that command, the server checks if we already have an item for the info hello=world&hokey=pokey. So there are two cases here. Case 1: the item doesn't exist; it's created. This case is easy. 201 Created Location: http://api.example.com/v1/item/bar Case 2: the item already exists. Here's where I'm struggling... not sure what's the best redirect code to use. 301 Moved Permanently? 302 Found? 303 See Other? 307 Temporary Redirect? Location: http://api.example.com/v1/item/foo I've studied the Wikipedia descriptions and RFC 2616, and none of these seem to be perfect. Here are the specific characteristics I'm looking for in this case: The redirect is permanent, as the ID will never change. So for efficiency, the client can and should make all future requests to the ID endpoint directly. This suggests 301, as the other three are meant to be temporary. The redirect should use GET, even though this request is POST. This suggests 303, as all others are technically supposed to re-use the POST method. In practice, browsers will use GET for 301 and 302, but this is a REST API, not a website meant to be used by regular users in browsers. It should be broadly usable and easy to play with. Specifically, 303 is HTTP/1.1 whereas 301 and 302 are HTTP/1.0. I'm not sure how much of an issue this is. At this point, I'm leaning towards 303 just to be semantically correct (use GET, don't re-POST) and just suck it up on the "temporary" part. But I'm not sure if 302 would be better since in practice it's been the same behavior as 303, but without requiring HTTP/1.1. But if I go down that line, I wonder if 301 is even better for the same reason plus the "permanent" part. Thoughts appreciated!

    Read the article

  • HTTP Post requests using HttpClient take 2 seconds, why?

    - by pableu
    Update: You might better hold off this for a bit, I just noticed I could be my fault after all. Working on this all afternoon, and then I find a flaw ten minutes after posting here, ts. Hi, I'am currently coding an android app that submits stuff in the background using HTTP Post and AsyncTask. I use the org.apache.http.client Package for this. I based my code on this example. Basically, my code looks like this: public void postData() { // Create a new HttpClient and Post Header HttpClient httpclient = new DefaultHttpClient(); HttpPost httppost = new HttpPost("http://192.168.1.137:8880/form"); try { List<NameValuePair> nameValuePairs = new ArrayList<NameValuePair>(2); nameValuePairs.add(new BasicNameValuePair("id", "12345")); nameValuePairs.add(new BasicNameValuePair("stringdata", "AndDev is Cool!")); httppost.setEntity(new UrlEncodedFormEntity(nameValuePairs)); // Execute HTTP Post Request HttpResponse response = httpclient.execute(httppost); } catch (ClientProtocolException e) { Log.e(TAG,e.toString()); } catch (IOException e) { Log.e(TAG,e.toString()); } } The problem is that the httpclient.execute(..) line takes around 1.5 to 3 seconds, and I do not understand why. Just requesting a page with HTTP Get takes around 80 ms or so, so the problem doesn't seem to be the network latency itself. The problem doesn't seem to be on the server side either, I have also tried POSTing data to http://www.disney.com/ with similarly slow results. And Firebug shows 1 ms response time when POSTing data to my server locally. This happens on the Emulator and with my Nexus One (both with Android 2.2). If you want to look at the complete code, I've put it on GitHub. It's just a dummy program to do HTTP Post in the background using AsyncTask on the push of a button. It's my first Android app, and my first java code for a long time. And incidentially, also my first question on Stackoverflow ;-) Any ideas why httpclient.execute(httppost) takes so long?

    Read the article

  • Use HTTP PUT to create new cache (ehCache) running on the same Tomcat?

    - by socal_javaguy
    I am trying to send a HTTP PUT (in order to create a new cache and populate it with my generated JSON) to ehCache using my webservice which is on the same local tomcat instance. Am new to RESTful Web Services and am using JDK 1.6, Tomcat 7, ehCache, and JSON. I have my POJOs defined like this: Person POJO: import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlRootElement; @XmlRootElement public class Person { private String firstName; private String lastName; private List<House> houses; // Getters & Setters } House POJO: import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlRootElement; @XmlRootElement public class House { private String address; private String city; private String state; // Getters & Setters } Using a PersonUtil class, I hardcoded the POJOs as follows: public class PersonUtil { public static Person getPerson() { Person person = new Person(); person.setFirstName("John"); person.setLastName("Doe"); List<House> houses = new ArrayList<House>(); House house = new House(); house.setAddress("1234 Elm Street"); house.setCity("Anytown"); house.setState("Maine"); houses.add(house); person.setHouses(houses); return person; } } Am able to create a JSON response per a GET request: @Path("") public class MyWebService{ @GET @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON) public Person getPerson() { return PersonUtil.getPerson(); } } When deploying the war to tomcat and pointing the browser to http://localhost:8080/personservice/ Generated JSON: { "firstName" : "John", "lastName" : "Doe", "houses": [ { "address" : "1234 Elmstreet", "city" : "Anytown", "state" : "Maine" } ] } So far, so good, however, I have a different app which is running on the same tomcat instance (and has support for REST): http://localhost:8080/ehcache/rest/ While tomcat is running, I can issue a PUT like this: echo "Hello World" | curl -S -T - http://localhost:8080/ehcache/rest/hello/1 When I "GET" it like this: curl http://localhost:8080/ehcache/rest/hello/1 Will yield: Hello World What I need to do is create a POST which will put my entire Person generated JSON and create a new cache: http://localhost:8080/ehcache/rest/person And when I do a "GET" on this previous URL, it should look like this: { "firstName" : "John", "lastName" : "Doe", "houses": [ { "address" : "1234 Elmstreet", "city" : "Anytown", "state" : "Maine" } ] } So, far, this is what my PUT looks like: @PUT @Path("/ehcache/rest/person") @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON) @Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON) public Response createCache() { ResponseBuilder response = Response.ok(PersonUtil.getPerson(), MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON); return response.build(); } Question(s): (1) Is this the correct way to write the PUT? (2) What should I write inside the createCache() method to have it PUT my generated JSON into: http://localhost:8080/ehcache/rest/person (3) What would the command line CURL comment look like to use the PUT? Thanks for taking the time to read this...

    Read the article

  • ExpressionEngine Segment Variables Lost on Site Index Page

    - by Jesse Bunch
    Hey Everyone, I've been messing with this for days now and can't seem to figure it out. I am trying to pass a 2nd segment variable to my client's index page. The URL I'm trying is: http://www.compupay.com/site/CSCPA/. The problem is, rather than showing the site's index page with the segment variable of "CSCPA" still in the URL, it shows the index page with no segment variables. Initially, I thought it was a .htaccess problem but I couldn't find anything in it that seemed out of whack. Any ideas? I am posting the .htaccess file so another pair of eyes can see it. Thanks for the help! # -- LG .htaccess Generator Start -- # .htaccess generated by LG .htaccess Generator v1.0.0 # http://leevigraham.com/cms-customisation/expressionengine/addon/lg-htaccess-generator/ # secure .htaccess file <Files .htaccess> order allow,deny deny from all </Files> # Dont list files in index pages IndexIgnore * #URL Segment Support AcceptPathInfo On Options +FollowSymLinks #Redirect old incoming links Redirect 301 /contactus.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/contact_us/ Redirect 301 /Internet_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/c/online_payroll/ Redirect 301 /Internet_Payroll_XpressPayroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/xpresspayroll/ Redirect 301 /about_compupay.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/news/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /news101507.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/news/ Redirect 301 /quote.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/get_a_free_quote/ Redirect 301 /solution_finder_sm.cfm http://www.compupay.com/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/mississippi_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/washington_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ #Redirect for old top linked to pages Redirect 301 /Payroll_Services.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /About_CompuPay.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/ Redirect 301 /Partnerships.cfm http://www.compupay.com/business_partner_solutions/ Redirect 301 /about_compupay.cfm?subpage=393 http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/ Redirect 301 /quote.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/get_a_free_quote/ Redirect 301 /After_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /Accountant_Services.cfm http://www.compupay.com/accountant_solutions/ Redirect 301 /careers/careers_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/careers/ Redirect 301 /Industry_Resources.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/ Redirect 301 /Client_Resources.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/client_login/ Redirect 301 /client_resources.cfm?subpage=375 http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/client_login/ Redirect 301 /solution_finder_sm.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /Internet_Payroll_PowerPayroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/powerpayroll/ Redirect 301 /Payroll_Outsourcing.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/why_outsource/ Redirect 301 /Phone_Payroll_Fax_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/phone_fax_payroll/ Redirect 301 /contactus.cfm http://www.compupay.com/about_compupay/contact_us/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/iowa_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ Redirect 301 /Construction_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/specialty_payroll/ Redirect 301 /PC_Payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/c/pc_payroll/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/washington_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ Redirect 301 /Internet_Payroll_XpressPayroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/xpresspayroll/ Redirect 301 /accountant_services.cfm?subpage=404 http://www.compupay.com/accountant_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=361 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=362 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=363 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=364 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=365 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=366 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=367 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=368 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=369 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /after_payroll.cfm?subpage=416 http://www.compupay.com/after_payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payload_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/payload/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=358 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=399 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=409 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=413 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /payroll_services.cfm?subpage=418 http://www.compupay.com/payroll_solutions/ Redirect 301 /state_payroll/mississippi_payroll.cfm http://www.compupay.com/resource_center/state_resources/ <IfModule mod_rewrite.c> RewriteEngine On RewriteBase / # Remove the www # RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.(.+)$ [NC] # RewriteRule ^ http://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301] # Force www RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.compupay.com$ [NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.compupay.com/$1 [R=301,L] # Add a trailing slash to paths without an extension RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(\.[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,5}|/)$ RewriteRule ^(.*)$ $1/ [L,R=301] #Legacy Partner Link Redirect RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} partnerCode=(.*) [NC] RewriteRule compupay_payroll.cfm site/%1? [R=301,L] # Catch any remaining requests for .cfm files RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} \.cfm RewriteRule ^.*$ http://www.compupay.com/ [R=301,L] #Expression Engine RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /index.php?/$1 [L] AcceptPathInfo On </IfModule> # Remove IE image toolbar <FilesMatch "\.(html|htm|php)$"> Header set imagetoolbar "no" </FilesMatch> # enable gzip compression <FilesMatch "\.(js|css|php)$"> SetOutputFilter DEFLATE </FilesMatch> #Deal with ETag <IfModule mod_headers.c> <FilesMatch "\.(ico|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif)$"> Header unset Last-Modified </FilesMatch> <FilesMatch "\.(ico|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|js|css|swf)$"> Header unset ETag FileETag None Header set Cache-Control "public" </FilesMatch> </IfModule> <IfModule mod_expires.c> <FilesMatch "\.(ico|flv|jpg|jpeg|png|gif|css|js)$"> ExpiresActive on ExpiresDefault "access plus 1 year" </FilesMatch> </IfModule> #Force Download PDFs <FilesMatch "\.(?i:pdf)$"> ForceType application/octet-stream Header set Content-Disposition attachment </FilesMatch> #Increase Upload Size php_value upload_max_filesize 5M php_value post_max_size 5M # -- LG .htaccess Generator End --

    Read the article

  • Can't complete dropbox installation from behind proxy

    - by Mark Jones
    Problem: My PC on campus sits behind a proxy (requiring authentication) and I can't setup Dropbox. I am convinced that this is a proxy issue as I can't setup Ubuntu one either (but I don't use Ubuntu One so that is not a problem). I have looked at the Ubuntu One fix but it seems to be to modify settings explicitly related to Ubuntu One. I can install the nautilus-dropbox package (compiled from source and from .deb package from website and from software centre) but once I click OK from the "Dropbox Installation" dialog box (prompting me to download the proprietary daemon) the installation just freezes with the OK button pressed. When I look at its process in System Monitor its waiting channel is inet_wait_for_connect. I have set the following proxy directives thus far: Added mj22:**@proxy.waikato.ac.nz:80 information to network proxy settings under network in settings. Added http_host and http_port variables under gconf-editor-system-proxy Added 'host', 'authentication_password' 'authentication_user' and ticked 'user authentication' and 'use_http_proxy' under gconf-editor-system-http_proxy Added export http_proxy="http://mj22:**@proxy.waikato.ac.nz:80/" to /etc/bash.bashrc Added Acquire::http::proxy "http://mj22:**@proxy.waikato.ac.nz:80/"; to /etc/apt/apt.conf (which is what I imagine is letting Software Center retrieve packages). (where ** is my password) I have also added the equivalent ftp and https lines for the above entries. I get the internet fine and Software Centre can download packages but thats it. Related issues: The software centre can't fetch reviews (but can download packages). When trying to add an online account in Gnome 3 a dialog pop up appears with "Error getting a Request Token: Cannot connect to proxy (proxy.waikato.ac.nz)" Updates: After some time (10mins ish) Dropbox shows an error dialog box that reads: Trouble connecting to Dropbox servers. Maybe your internet connection is down, or you need to set you http_proxy environment variable. Is there a way I can see what environment variables are currently set?

    Read the article

  • Can't complete dropbox installation from behind proxy in Ubuntu 11.10

    - by Mark Jones
    Problem: My PC on campus sits behind a proxy (requiring authentication) and I can't setup Dropbox. I am convinced that this is a proxy issue as I can't setup Ubuntu one either (but I don't use Ubuntu One so that is not a problem). I have looked at the Ubuntu One fix but it seems to be to modify settings explicitly related to Ubuntu One. I can install the nautilus-dropbox package (compiled from source and from .deb package from website and from software centre) but once I click OK from the "Dropbox Installation" dialog box (prompting me to download the proprietary daemon) the installation just freezes with the OK button pressed. When I look at its process in System Monitor its waiting channel is inet_wait_for_connect. I have set the following proxy directives thus far: Added mj22:**@proxy.waikato.ac.nz:80 information to network proxy settings under network in settings. Added http_host and http_port variables under gconf-editor-system-proxy Added 'host', 'authentication_password' 'authentication_user' and ticked 'user authentication' and 'use_http_proxy' under gconf-editor-system-http_proxy Added export http_proxy="http://mj22:**@proxy.waikato.ac.nz:80/" to /etc/bash.bashrc Added Acquire::http::proxy "http://mj22:**@proxy.waikato.ac.nz:80/"; to /etc/apt/apt.conf (which is what I imagine is letting Software Center retrieve packages). (where ** is my password) I have also added the equivalent ftp and https lines for the above entries. I get the internet fine and Software Centre can download packages but thats it. Related issues: The software centre can't fetch reviews (but can download packages). When trying to add an online account in Gnome 3 a dialog pop up appears with "Error getting a Request Token: Cannot connect to proxy (proxy.waikato.ac.nz)" Updates: After some time (10mins ish) Dropbox shows an error dialog box that reads: Trouble connecting to Dropbox servers. Maybe your internet connection is down, or you need to set you http_proxy environment variable. Is there a way I can see what environment variables are currently set?

    Read the article

  • Why google return soft 404 when I redirect on signup page?

    - by Hettomei
    Since one month, I've got an increased "soft 404" reported by google webmaster tools but work well for users. I made some fix but can't figure out how to solve it. Configuration (maybe useless): I have a website built with rails 3.1 Authentication is handled by the gem Devise Problem: On this page http://en.bemyboat.com/yacht-charter/9965-sailboat-beneteau-oceanis-43 when you click on "Ask a Boat request" (a simple form, in GET to : http://en.bemyboat.com/boat_requests/new/9965) you are redirected with the http status 302 to sign in, and then sent back to the new page if successfully sign in. Google tells me that the link on "ask a boat request" returns a soft 404. I can't make this form in "POST" (which will solve the problem) because we need to automatically redirect user to the good page after sign in. (the Gem Devise memorize the "get" link) To simplify, the question is: how to protect a private page with authentication, reached with a simple "get" and not to be penalized by google with "soft 404". Thank you. PS : this website suffer a lot about english translation... please don't care.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68  | Next Page >