Search Results

Search found 6479 results on 260 pages for 'distribution lists'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 62/260 | < Previous Page | 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69  | Next Page >

  • "unresolvable problem" error when upgrading from 12.04 to 14.04

    - by flyingfisch
    So I have solved this issue, but now I have another problem: An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade. This can be caused by: * Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu * Running the current pre-release version of Ubuntu * Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu If none of this applies, then please report this bug using the command 'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core' in a terminal. I am not upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu and I am not running a pre-release either. I have unchecked all my 3rd-party packages using Ubuntu Software Manager, EditSoftware Sources... What else might be wrong? UPDATE After doing sudo update-manager -d and sudo apt-get update;sudo apt-get dist-upgrade as per JimB's post, and then running sudo do-release-upgrade, here what I get: Err http://extras.ubuntu.com trusty/main Translation-en Err http://extras.ubuntu.com trusty/main Translation-en_US Err http://extras.ubuntu.com trusty/main Translation-en Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com trusty/main Translation-en_US Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com trusty/main Translation-en Fetched 0 B in 0s (0 B/s) Checking package manager Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Building data structures... Done Calculating the changes Calculating the changes Could not calculate the upgrade An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade. This can be caused by: * Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu * Running the current pre-release version of Ubuntu * Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu If none of this applies, then please report this bug using the command 'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core' in a terminal. Restoring original system state Aborting Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Building data structures... Done === Command detached from window (Mon Aug 18 23:53:10 2014) === === Command terminated with exit status 1 (Mon Aug 18 23:53:10 2014) ===

    Read the article

  • when I type apt-get -f install, I get the error message

    - by gene
    xserver-xorg-core (2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.8) breaks xserver-xorg-video-5 and is installed. Also I can not upgrade my software, It said that the package system is broken, with detail information: The following packages have unmet dependencies: xserver-xorg-core: Depends: xserver-common (>= 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.8) but 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.8 is installed when I issue sudo apt-get update, the output seems fine the source is(sorry the output has too many links that I can not post in);http://archive.ubuntu.com Reading package lists... Done ====================== when I issue sudo apt-get dist-upgrade, the output is: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: xserver-xorg-core : Breaks: xserver-xorg-video-5 E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. ================== when I issue 'sudo apt-get -f install', the output is: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of xserver-xorg-video-radeon: xserver-xorg-core (2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.8) breaks xserver-xorg-video-5 and is installed. xserver-xorg-video-radeon (1:6.12.1-0ubuntu2) provides xserver-xorg-video-5. dpkg: error processing xserver-xorg-video-radeon (--configure):dependency problems leaving unconfigured No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure. Errors were encountered while processing: xserver-xorg-video-radeon E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

    Read the article

  • Unable to install Skype ("Unmet dependencies" error)

    - by Alex Maslakov
    Trying to install skype on Ubuntu 12, I faced and issue. When I type: sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install skype I get an error Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done skype is already the newest version. You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: skype : Depends: lib32stdc++6 (>= 4.1.1-21) but it is not going to be installed Depends: lib32asound2 (> 1.0.14) but it is not going to be installed Depends: ia32-libs but it is not going to be installed Depends: libc6-i386 (>= 2.7-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: lib32gcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1-21+ia32.libs.1.19) but it is not going to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). How do I solve it? Is the way I'm using the right one to install skype? UPDATE: If I try to do sudo apt-get install lib32stdc++6 lib32asound2 ia32-libs libc6-i386 lib32gcc1 skype then I get Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done skype is already the newest version. You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: ia32-libs : Depends: ia32-libs-multiarch lib32asound2 : Depends: libasound2 (= 1.0.25-1ubuntu10) E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution).

    Read the article

  • this error appeared when upgrating 12.04 LTS to 12.10 [closed]

    - by habcity
    Possible Duplicate: How do I fix a “Problem with MergeList” error when trying to do an update? ryder@ryder-Q1500M:~$ do-release-upgrade Checking for a new Ubuntu release Get:1 Upgrade tool signature [198 B] Get:2 Upgrade tool [1,200 kB] Fetched 1,200 kB in 6s (6,988 B/s) authenticate 'quantal.tar.gz' against 'quantal.tar.gz.gpg' extracting 'quantal.tar.gz' [sudo] password for ryder: Reading cache A fatal error occurred Please report this as a bug and include the files /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log and /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log in your report. The upgrade has aborted. Your original sources.list was saved in /etc/apt/sources.list.distUpgrade. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/tmp/update-manager-63XThv/quantal", line 10, in sys.exit(main()) File "/tmp/update-manager-63XThv/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeMain.py", line 237, in main save_system_state(logdir) File "/tmp/update-manager-63XThv/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeMain.py", line 130, in save_system_state scrub_sources=True) File "/tmp/update-manager-63XThv/DistUpgrade/apt_clone.py", line 146, in save_state self._write_state_installed_pkgs(sourcedir, tar) File "/tmp/update-manager-63XThv/DistUpgrade/apt_clone.py", line 173, in _write_state_installed_pkgs cache = self._cache_cls(rootdir=sourcedir) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apt/cache.py", line 102, in init self.open(progress) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apt/cache.py", line 145, in open self._cache = apt_pkg.Cache(progress) SystemError: E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-backports_multiverse_i18n_Translation-en, E:The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.

    Read the article

  • Multiple URL's going to same page - Kosher for Google?

    - by Ashoka15
    I hear conflicting answers from people about this, and I'm a developer by trade, and my SEO knowledge is not what it should be. Here's my situation: I run a website that lists hotels, restaurants, bars, shops, etc for a small Asian beach town. Lots of establishments here are hotels with a restaurant and bar, as well as restaurants that are also bars. As en example, a Mexican restaurant that also functions as a full cocktail bar. I first set it up so each establishment has one page, but can create multiple pages based on their other areas of business. This forces people to create TWO listings under the same name, and most just add the exact same information onto each page, making things redundant. I am re-arranging the database so that a establishment has only ONE listing (one unique page referenced by the unique code '12345ABCDEF') that is accessible from browsing under "Restaurants" and "Bars", and has the URL structures: site.com/dining/mexican/12345ABCDEF/business-name.html site.com/bars/cocktail_bars/12345ABCDEF/business-name.html I could easily simplify the URL to just the unique code and name: site.com/12345ABCDEF/business-name.html But, I found that Google has parsed by URL structure and lists like this on their SERP: Home > Dining > Mexican With each pointing to the default page for homepage, restaurants and Mexican restaurants. If I simplify the URL structure, will I lose these associations? Could Google also be picking up this structure from my breadcrumb trail at the top of the page? What is the best way to set up URL's on these pages so I am not penalized by Google for having identical information on two URL's, while still being able to have places show up as they did with the old system?

    Read the article

  • Can't update packages or use Ubuntu Software Center (E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.)

    - by user94189
    I get the following errors when trying to run the auto Update Manager Could not initialize the package information An unresolvable problem occurred while initializing the package information. Please report this bug against the 'update-manager' package and include the following error message: 'E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/ppa.launchpad.net_bugs-sehe_zfs-fuse_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_binary-amd64_Packages, E:The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.' When I run sudo apt-get update, I get these errors W: GPG error: http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <[email protected]> W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 1FFD34C9EB13C954 Launchpad CoverGloobus W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 4A67F94CBF965FF5 Launchpad PPA for Happy-Neko W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/bugs-sehe/zfs-fuse/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/bugs-sehe/zfs-fuse/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/bugs-sehe/zfs-fuse/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

    Read the article

  • Cannot install ia32-lib package

    - by A British Person
    I have several programs that reuquire 32 bit packages (pointing to the ia32-lib package). However, when I try to install it, this happens. spirit@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install ia32-libs Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: ia32-libs : Depends: ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. No big whoop, packages die all the time. I tried a month later however and I still got this error, trying to install the specific package produces this error. spirit@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install ia32-libs-multiarch Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package ia32-libs-multiarch is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package 'ia32-libs-multiarch' has no installation candidate I am no Linux whizz-kid, but this seems to be that the package doesn't exist. I searched for Skype in the software centre (I was told this installs the 32-bit packages) and it does not appear in the software centre, and the downloadable from their website produces an error about - funnily enough - no 32-bit packages. Anyone who helps me will get a medal from the gods with the weight of a thousand planets. Just don't wear it for god's sake.

    Read the article

  • Wireless switch on Dell XT2 - strange behaviour of rfkill

    - by DyP
    I have an Dell Latitude XT2 using an Intel WLAN card (lspci lists it as "Intel Corporation Ultimate N WiFi Link 5300") running Lubuntu 12.04 with recent updates. The laptop has a hardware WLAN switch. I have problems activating the WLAN when booting with the hardware switch set to "off". The situation is a bit confusing, unfortunately. rfkill lists two WLAN devices (though lspci only shows the Intel one). This is the situation when booting with the hardware switch set to "Off": 0: dell-wifi: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: yes Hard blocked: yes 1: dell-bluetooth: Bluetooth Soft blocked: yes Hard blocked: yes 2: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: yes Hard blocked: yes From some tests, I conclude WLAN is only activated when both, the dell-wifi and phy0, are unblocked by soft- and hardware. But I can only unblock dell-wifi after the hardware switch is set to "on". Procedure right from boot with hardware switch set to "Off": Soft-unblocking phy0 works as expected. Could be done by start-up script. sudo rfkill unblock 0: nothing happens. Soft block of dell-wifi not removed. Set the hardware switch to "on": phy0 gets its hard block removed. Still no WLAN. sudo rfkill unblock 0: both the soft and hard lock of dell-wifi are removed. WLAN is now active and works. sudo rfkill block 0: only adds the soft block as expected. WLAN goes off again. So, in order to activate WLAN, I have to use the hardware switch and afterwards (manually) run a script - that's a bit inconvenient. Does someone know a better solution? Maybe a daemon could help that listens to rfkill events to unblock dell-wifi after I have set the hardware switch to "on"? (sounds like another workaround) When booting with the hardware switch set to "On", nothing is blocked neither hard nor soft.

    Read the article

  • Errors when installing updates

    - by user71613
    I am getting the following errors when installing updates. They started to appear after I upgraded my system to 12.04. Errors were encountered while processing: samba-common samba-common-bin samba grub-pc grub-gfxpayload-lists Setting up samba-common (2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.2) ... perl: error while loading shared libraries: libperl.so.5.12: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing samba-common (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of samba-common-bin: samba-common-bin depends on samba-common (>= 2:3.4.0~pre1-2); however: Package samba-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing samba-common-bin (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of samba: samba depends on samba-common (= 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.2); however: Package samba-common is not configured yet. samba depends on samba-common-bin; however: Package samba-common-bin is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing samba (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Setting up grub-gfxpayload-lists (0.6) ... Setting up grub-pc (1.99-21ubuntu3.1) ... perl: error while loading shared libraries: libperl.so.5.12: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing grub-pc (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 Any ideas how to fix this?

    Read the article

  • How to ask developers to think about high resolution screens

    - by WhiteWind
    I just got a ASUS N56VZ laptop, and it`s all good, but the screen resolution 1920x1080px. I am not asking, how to scale ui elements. If someone is interested I have found some tricks: increase font size in system settings increase unity dock size in MyUnity or system settings in modern Ubuntu versions. tweak userChrome.js of FireFox to make buttons|panels|icons larger add DefaultZoomLevel extension to FireFox to make it zoom pages initially. But all of it is miserable, because there are some big bugs: window decoration elements are way too small to pick them with mouse. I can't scale window easily and I can't position my cursor fast on the close|maximize buttons. Tuning lines like in sound volume dialog are hardly clickable at all. Unity top panel (status panel & tray) hardly can contain the bigger font, so it looks ugly, but icons are still the same. Sometimes I can`t read text, as it is cropped (and I cant scale some dialogs as it has fixed size) Chromium is not usable at all (ok, it's not Ubuntu problem, but the problem still exists) JAVA applications are not scalable (same as above) In FF I am able to get descent results in most cases, but multiplication of system font increase and browser font increase makes system controls (combobox, lists, drop down lists) extremely big, so I cant even control the zoom level on the page. IMHO, we should post a bug report (but what kind of bug?) and vote for it! The problem is even deeper, but at least we should ask developers to think about it. So my question is: how can I post a report (the right words and right place) and how can we (who already has that problem, or who want it to be solved before hardware upgrade) vote for faster solution. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Rendering design. How can I effectively deal with forward, deferred and transparent rendering?

    - by user1423893
    I have many objects in my game world that all derive from one base class. Each object will have different materials and will therefore be required to be drawn using various rendering techniques. I currently use the following order for rendering my objects. Deferred Forward Transparent (order independent) Each object has a rendering flag that denotes which one of the above methods should be used. The list of base objects in the scene are then iterated through and added to separate lists of deferred, forward or transparent objects based on their rendering flag value. The individual lists are then iterated through and drawn using the order above. Each list is cleared at the end of the frame. This methods works fairly well but it requires different draw methods for each material type. For example each object will require the following methods in order to be compatible with the possible flag settings. object.DrawDeferred() object.DrawForward() object.DrawTransparent() It is also hard to see where methods outside of materials, such as rendering shadow maps, would fit using this "flag & method" design. object.DrawShadow() I was hoping that someone may have some suggestions for improving this rendering process, possibly making it more generic and less verbose?

    Read the article

  • Laptop power button not working

    - by DyP
    I have a (seemingly rather exotic) Dell Latitude XT2 notebook running Lubuntu 12.04, fresh install. Tried to get the power button to work as expected (opening lubuntu-logout, just as I think it was meant to be out-of-the box), but no success: power button does nothing but forced power-off on long press. Here some more information, please ask if something more could help: Power button is recognized as a device: xinput lists Power Button as a slave keyboard at /dev/input/event1, and I can run a tool to listen to that device and invoke some action (successfully). But using .config/openbox/lubuntu-rc.xml to assign some action to XF86ShutDown or XF86PowerOff does nothing. Works well for any key of the keyboard. xinput --test reports a keycode (key press, key release) of 124 when pressing & releasing the power button. xmodmap -pk lists 124 mapped to XF86PowerOff which seems correct to me (btw: is this the same as XF86ShutDown?) When assigning another keysymname to the 124 keycode, e.g. 'w', still nothing happens when pressing the power button (no window seems to receive a 'w'). Works well for any key on the keyboard. The outputs of xev for a press/release of the power button irritate me: MappingNotify event, serial 41, synthetic NO, window 0x0, request MappingKeyboard, first_keycode 8, count 248 FocusOut event, serial 41, synthetic NO, window 0x2a00001, mode NotifyGrab, detail NotifyAncestor FocusIn event, serial 41, synthetic NO, window 0x2a00001, mode NotifyUngrab, detail NotifyAncestor KeymapNotify event, serial 41, synthetic NO, window 0x0, keys: 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (instead of 93, I also get different values) I might have missed something very basic since I'm not very familiar with both openbox/lubuntu and the X input system. Btw.: same goes for three other special buttons on my laptop..

    Read the article

  • State Changes in a Component Based Architecture [closed]

    - by Maxem
    I'm currently working on a game and using the naive component based architecture thingie (Entities are a bag of components, entity.Update() calls Update on each updateable component), while the addition of new features is really simple, it makes a few things really difficult: a) multithreading / currency b) networking c) unit testing. Multithreading / Concurrency is difficult because I basically have to do poor mans concurrency (running the entity updates in separate threads while locking only stuff that crashes (like lists) and ignoring the staleness of read state (some states are already updated, others aren't)) Networking: There are no explicit state changes that I could efficiently push over the net. Unit testing: All updates may or may not conflict, so automated testing is at least awkward. I was thinking about these issues a bit and would like your input on these changes / idea: Switch from the naive cba to a cba with sub systems that work on lists of components Make all state changes explicit Combine 1 and 2 :p Example world update: statePostProcessing.Wait() // ensure that post processing has finished Apply(postProcessedState) state = new StateBag() Concurrently( () => LifeCycleSubSystem.Update(state), // populates the state bag () => MovementSubSystem.Update(state), // populates the state bag .... }) statePostProcessing = Future(() => PostProcess(state)) statePostProcessing.Start() // Tick is finished, the post processing happens in the background So basically the changes are (consistently) based on the data for the last tick; the post processing can a) generate network packages and b) fix conflicts / remove useless changes (example: entity has been destroyed - ignore movement etc.). EDIT: To clarify the granularity of the state changes: If I save these post processed state bags and apply them to an empty world, I see exactly what has happened in the game these state bags originated from - "Free" replay capability. EDIT2: I guess I should have used the term Event instead of State Change and point out that I kind of want to use the Event Sourcing pattern

    Read the article

  • Lubuntu 13.04, kernel still 3.8.0-32-generic

    - by Blue Ice
    My question is very similar to Ubuntu 13.10, kernel still 3.8.0-31-generic. Recently was updating to Saucy and the ethernet cable got unplugged. So I decided to run Software Update again, to reinstall files. It returned that "everything is up to date". But according to these command-line searches, that is incorrect. How can I install Saucy now safely from the command line? sudo apt-get install lubuntu-desktop Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done lubuntu-desktop is already the newest version. The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required: linux-image-extra-3.8.0-19-generic Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove it. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. sudo apt-get dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. sudo apt-get update Get:1 http://extras.ubuntu.com raring Release.gpg [72 B] Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com raring Release Get:2 http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring Release.gpg Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main Sources Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main i386 Packages Get:3 http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring-updates Release.gpg Get:4 http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring-backports Release.gpg Get:5 http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring-security Release.gpg Get:6 http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring Release Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main Translation-en_US Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main Translation-en Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net raring Release.gpg Ign http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring Release E: GPG error: http://az-1.hpcloud.mirror.websitedevops.com raring Release: The following signatures were invalid: NODATA 1 NODATA 2 lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 13.04 Release: 13.04 uname -r 3.8.0-32-generic

    Read the article

  • CVE-2006-3744 Multiple Integer overflow vulnerabilities in ImageMagick

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2006-3744 Numeric Errors vulnerability 5.1 ImageMagick Solaris 10 SPARC: 136882-03 X86: 136883-03 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • MS12-070 : Security Updates for all supported versions of SQL Server

    - by AaronBertrand
    This week there was a security release for all supported versions of SQL Server . Each version has 32-bit and 64-bit patches, and each version has GDR (General Distribution Release) and QFE (Quick-Fix Engineering) patches. GDR should be applied if you are at the base (RTM or SP) build for your version, while QFE should be applied if you have installed any cumulative updates after the RTM or SP build. ( More details here .) SQL Server 2005 RTM, SP1, SP2, SP3 - not supported SP4 - GDR = 9.00.5069,...(read more)

    Read the article

  • Update Manager unable to get updates

    - by dPEN
    In last few days my Ubuntu 11.10 update manager is unable to get new updates. When I checked update log I saw that for couple of updates it says "Network isn't available". For other updates it downloaded logs and and internet connection also works fine. Unable to attached screenshot due to SPAM prevention policy. But for below Release gpgv:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/extras.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_oneiric_Release.gpg it says "Network isn't available" For all other Releases it is downloading fine. And due to this I dont see any update available in last 10 days. LOG OF sudo apt-get update: dipen@EIDLCPU1018:~$ sudo apt-get update [sudo] password for dipen: Ign http:/extras.ubuntu.com oneiric InRelease Ign http:/archive.canonical.com oneiric InRelease Ign http:/archive.canonical.com lucid InRelease Get:1 http:/extras.ubuntu.com oneiric Release.gpg [72 B] Get:2 http:/archive.canonical.com oneiric Release.gpg [198 B] Hit http:/extras.ubuntu.com oneiric Release Get:3 http:/archive.canonical.com lucid Release.gpg [198 B] Err http:/extras.ubuntu.com oneiric Release Hit http:/archive.canonical.com oneiric Release Ign http:/archive.canonical.com oneiric Release Hit http:/archive.canonical.com lucid Release Ign http:/archive.canonical.com lucid Release Ign http:/archive.canonical.com oneiric/partner i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http:/archive.canonical.com oneiric/partner TranslationIndex Ign http:/archive.canonical.com lucid/partner i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http:/archive.canonical.com lucid/partner TranslationIndex Hit http:/archive.canonical.com oneiric/partner i386 Packages Hit http:/archive.canonical.com lucid/partner i386 Packages Ign http:/dl.google.com stable InRelease Ign http:/archive.canonical.com oneiric/partner Translation-en_IN Ign http:/archive.canonical.com oneiric/partner Translation-en Ign http:/archive.canonical.com lucid/partner Translation-en_IN Ign http:/archive.canonical.com lucid/partner Translation-en Ign http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric InRelease Ign http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates InRelease Ign http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security InRelease Get:4 http//dl.google.com stable Release.gpg [198 B] Get:5 http//in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric Release.gpg [198 B] Get:6 http//in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates Release.gpg [198 B] Get:7 http//in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release.gpg [198 B] Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric Release Ign http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric Release Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates Release Err http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates Release Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release Ign http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release Ign http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse i386 Packages/DiffIndex Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main TranslationIndex Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse TranslationIndex Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe TranslationIndex Ign http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse i386 Packages/DiffIndex Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main TranslationIndex Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse TranslationIndex Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe TranslationIndex Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main i386 Packages Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted i386 Packages Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe i386 Packages Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Translation-en Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse Translation-en Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/restricted Translation-en Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe Translation-en Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main i386 Packages Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted i386 Packages Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe i386 Packages Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Translation-en Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse Translation-en Get:8 http//dl.google.com stable Release [1,347 B] Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted Translation-en Hit http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Translation-en Get:9 http//dl.google.com stable/main i386 Packages [1,214 B] Ign http:/dl.google.com stable/main TranslationIndex Ign http:/dl.google.com stable/main Translation-en_IN Ign http:/dl.google.com stable/main Translation-en Fetched 3,821 B in 41s (91 B/s) Reading package lists... Done W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http:/extras.ubuntu.com oneiric Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 16126D3A3E5C1192 Ubuntu Extras Archive Automatic Signing Key <[email protected]> W: GPG error: http:/archive.canonical.com oneiric Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <[email protected]> W: GPG error: http:/archive.canonical.com lucid Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <[email protected]> W: GPG error: http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <[email protected]> W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <[email protected]> W: GPG error: http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <[email protected]> W: Failed to fetch http:/extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/Release W: Failed to fetch http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-updates/Release W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. dipen@EIDLCPU1018:~$ LOG of sudo apt-get upgrade: dipen@EIDLCPU1018:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages have been kept back: ghc6-doc haskell-zlib-doc libghc6-zlib-doc 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded. dipen@EIDLCPU1018:~$ /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric main restricted deb http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates main restricted deb http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric universe deb http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates universe deb http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric multiverse deb http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates multiverse deb http:/archive.canonical.com/ubuntu oneiric partner deb http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-security main restricted deb http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-security universe deb http:/in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-security multiverse deb http:/extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main #Third party developers repository deb http:/archive.canonical.com/ lucid partner

    Read the article

  • Merging /boot and rearring grub2 entries

    - by Tobias Kienzler
    I have used 10.10 and now for testing purposes installed 10.04 to a separate partition. 10.10 is currently on a single partition, while for 10.04 I decided to separate /boot to a third partition. Now my questions: How can I move and merge 10.10's /boot on the new /boot partition What do I have to modify to rearrange the (automatic) entries? How can I have the entries contain the distribution name to reduce confusion? How can I make sure the grub configuration stays identical?

    Read the article

  • Closest to “Mathematica Graphics[]" drawing environment for Python

    - by 500
    Being only familiar with Mathematica and its Graphics, I have now to learn to draw Graphics using Python for a server. Mostly conditional combination of simple shape. What would be a package for Python that make drawing Graphics as close as possible as the Mathematica Graphics environment ? For Example, I would need to do such thing as in : http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/1010/2d-gaussian-distribution-of-squares-coordinates#comment2475_1010

    Read the article

  • AVG Rescue CD : détecter des virus sans recourir à votre OS, Par Poinsot Benjamin

    Bonjour, je partage avec vous aujourd'hui mon dernier article en date, à savoir AVG Rescue CD : détecter des virus sans recourir à votre OS. Vous pouvez le consulter à cette adresse : http://bpoinsot.developpez.com/tutor...avg-rescue-cd/. Synopsis : Citation: AVG Rescue CD offre la possibilité de réaliser un scan antivirus de votre ordinateur depuis une distribution Linux de type LiveCD. Ainsi, vous profitez de la...

    Read the article

  • Hands-on: Ubuntu One music store will rock in Lucid Lynx

    <b>ars Technica:</b> "Canonical, the company behind the Ubuntu Linux distribution, has announced the official launch of the Ubuntu One music store. Integrated into the Rhythmbox music player in the upcoming Ubuntu 10.04 release, the store allows users to purchase downloadable songs and albums."

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69  | Next Page >