Search Results

Search found 6744 results on 270 pages for 'linq entities'.

Page 63/270 | < Previous Page | 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70  | Next Page >

• Linq to Sql Data class in dbml

  - by Simon

  I am abit curious about dbml.... Should I create one dbml file for one database or separated into different parts e.g. User dbml (only tables relate to users) etc? When I do this I will have abit of problems. Assume the User dbml has a User table and if the Order dbml has a User table as well, this won't be allowed if the entity namespace are the same. If I have set a different entity namespace for each of the dbml, it works but this will gives me a different entity of User table. When a single data returns to Business Logic layer, there is a difficulty of knowing which entity namespace of the user table to be used. If I built one dbml file instead of having separate dbml, will single dbml appear slower than the separated dbml version when fetching the data from the database.

  Read the article

• Compiled Linq Queries with Built-in SQL functions

  - by Brandi

  I have a query that I am executing in C# that is taking way too much time: string Query = "SELECT COUNT(HISTORYID) FROM HISTORY WHERE YEAR(CREATEDATE) = YEAR(GETDATE()) "; Query += "AND MONTH(CREATEDATE) = MONTH(GETDATE()) AND DAY(CREATEDATE) = DAY(GETDATE()) AND USERID = '" + EmployeeID + "' "; Query += "AND TYPE = '5'"; I then use SqlCommand Command = new SqlCommand(Query, Connection) and SqlDataReader Reader = Command.ExecuteReader() to read in the data. This is taking over a minute to execute from C#, but is much quicker in SSMS. I see from google searching you can do something with CompiledQuery, but I'm confused whether I can still use the built in SQL functions YEAR, MONTH, DAY, and GETDATE. If anyone can show me an example of how to create and call a compiled query using the built in functions, I will be very grateful! Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• LINQ "table" variable

  - by Cat

  I'm trying to turn a method I have right now into a more "generic" method that returns a string. Right now, the method uses a statement like this: var app = (from d in testContext.DAPPs where d.sserID == (Guid)user.ProviderUserKey select d).ToList(); I process the results of "app", add extra text etc. The piece that changes (that I need to make more "generic") is the table name (DAPPs). Is there a way I can do that, or, a better way to go around this all together?

  Read the article

• DBnull in Linq query causing problems

  - by nat

  hi there i am doing a query thus: int numberInInterval = (from dsStatistics.J2RespondentRow item in jStats.J2Respondent where item.EndTime > dtIntervalLower && item.EndTime <= dtIntervalUpper select item).count(); there appear to be some dbnulls in the endtime column.. any way i can avoid these? tried adding && where item.endtime != null.. and even != dbnull.value do i have to do a second (first) query to grab all that arent null then run the above one? im sure its super simple fix, but im still missing it.. as per thanks nat

  Read the article

• Linq To Sql: Compiled Queries and Extension Methods

  - by Beni

  Hi community, I'm interessted, how does Linq2Sql handles a compiled query, that returns IQueryable. If I call an extension method based on a compiled query like "GetEntitiesCompiled().Count()" or "GetEntitiesCompiled().Take(x)". What does Linq2Sql do in the background? This would be very bad, so in this situation I should write a compiled query like "CountEntitiesCompiled". Does he load the result (in this case "GetEntitiesCompiled()") into the memory (mapped to the entity class like "ToList()")? So what situations make sense, when the compiled queries return IQueryable, that query is not able to modify, before request to the Sql-Server. So in my opinion I can just as good return List. Thanks for answers!

  Read the article

• 'And' operator in Linq

  - by Ani

  I have a query that prints userid in label1 when username is entered.Works fine; but i want to write query for username and password that prints userid. so how can i write it? i tried writing using 'and' operator but dont seems to work. int id = (from auser in lq.logins where auser.username == userNameString //&& auser.Password =pwdString select auser.userid).SingleOrDefault(); label1.Text = id.ToString(); Thanks Ani

  Read the article

• Why LINQ will work this way?

  - by Benny

  public static ArrayList GetStudentAsArrayList() { ArrayList students = new ArrayList { new Student() { RollNumber = 1,Name ="Alex " , Section = 1 ,HostelNumber=1 }, new Student() { RollNumber = 2,Name ="Jonty " , Section = 2 ,HostelNumber=2 }, }; return students; } this doesn't compile: ArrayList is not IEnumerable ArrayList lstStudents = GetStudentAsArrayList(); var res = from r in lstStudents select r; but this will compile: ArrayList lstStudents = GetStudentAsArrayList(); var res = from Student r in lstStudents select r; Can anybody explain? what's the magic here?

  Read the article

• Using Multiple Foreign Keys to the same table in LINQ

  - by Graeme

  I have a table Users and a table Items In the Items table, I have fields such as ModifiedBy CreatedBy AssignedTo which all have a userId integer. The database is set up to have these as foreign keys back to the Users table. When using LINQToSQL, the relationships which are automatically built from the dbml end up giving me names like User, User1 and User2 e.g. myItem.User1.Name or myItem.User2.Name Obviously this isn't very readable and I'd like it be along the lines of myItem.CreatedByUser.Name or myItem.ModifiedByUser.Name etc I could change the names of the relationships but that means I have to redo that every time I change the db schema and refresh the dbml. Is there any way round this?

  Read the article

• Linq 2 SQL Store inherited classes - not mapped to tables in the database

  - by user348672

  Hi. I'm trying to introduce the Linq2SQL technique into the project and have encountered the following issue: I've created ORM classes based on the Northwind database. In some other application I create several classes derived from the Linq2SQL classes. I'm able to add such a class to EntitySet but the application fails to submit changes. Is there any way around this? Sample code(MyClass is derived from the Order): DataClasses1DataContext northwind = new DataClasses1DataContext(); Product chai = northwind.Products.Single(p => p.ProductName == "Chai"); Product tofu = northwind.Products.Single(p => p.ProductName == "Tofu"); Order myOrder = new Order(); myOrder.OrderDate = DateTime.Now; myOrder.RequiredDate = DateTime.Now.AddDays(1); myOrder.Freight = 34; Order_Detail myItem1 = new Order_Detail(); myItem1.Product = chai; myItem1.Quantity = 12345; Order_Detail myItem2 = new Order_Detail(); myItem2.Product = tofu; myItem2.Quantity = 3; myOrder.Order_Details.Add(myItem1); myOrder.Order_Details.Add(myItem2); Customer myCustomer = northwind.Customers.Single(c => c.CompanyName == "B's Beverages"); MyClass newOrder = new MyClass(); newOrder.OrderDate = DateTime.Now; newOrder.RequiredDate = DateTime.Now.AddDays(31); newOrder.Freight = 35; Order_Detail myItem3 = new Order_Detail(); myItem3.Product = tofu; myItem3.Quantity = 3; newOrder.Order_Details.Add(myItem3); myCustomer.Orders.Add(myOrder); myCustomer.Orders.Add(newOrder); As I said I'm able to add the newOrder object but unable to submit into the database.

  Read the article

• Which LINQ query is more effective?

  - by Danny Chen

  I have a huge IEnumerable(suppose the name is myItems), which way is more effective? Solution 1: Filter it first then ForEach. Array.ForEach(myItems.Where(FILTER-IT-HERE).ToArray(),MY-ACTION); Solution 2: Do RETURN in MY-ACTION if the item is not up to the mustard. Array.ForEach(myItems.ToArray(),MY-ACTION-WITH-FILTER); Is one of them always better than another? Or any other good suggestions? Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• Anyone knows any Linq to XQuery implementation ?

  - by Tim Mahy

  Hi all, the question is basically in the title. Also if anyone has started some kind of implementation but never finished it and is willing to share it, I'm interested! :) Or if it is being used internally in an open-source project... greetings, Tim

  Read the article

• What's FirstOrDefault for DateTime in Linq?

  - by Keltex

  If I have a query that returns a DateTime, what's the value of FirstOrDefault? Is there a generic way to get the default value of a C# scalar? Example: var list = (from item in db.Items where item.ID==1234 select item.StartDate).FirstOrDefault(); Edit: Assume that the column StartDate can't be null.

  Read the article

• linq null parameter

  - by kusanagi

  how can i do the code static string BuildMenu(List<Menu> menu, int? parentId) { foreach (var item in menu.Where(i => i.ParentMenu == parentId || i.ParentMenu.MenuId == parentId).ToList()) { } } return BuildMenu(menuList,null); so if parentId==null then return only records i = i.ParentMenu == null but when parentId is 0 then return records with i.ParentMenu.MenuId == parentId

  Read the article

• using Linq to partition data into arrays

  - by user200295

  I have an array of elements where the element has a Flagged boolean value. 1 flagged 2 not flagged 3 not flagged 4 flagged 5 not flagged 6 not flagged 7 not flagged 8 flagged 9 not flagged I want to break it into arrays based on the flagged indicator output array 1 {1,2,3} array 2 {4,5,6,7} array 3 {8,9}

  Read the article

• linq selecting into custom object

  - by user276640

  what is wrong with such code public List<SearchItem> Search(string find) { return (from i in _dataContext.News where i.Text.Contains(find) select new SearchItem { ControllerAction = "test", id = i.Id.ToString(), LinkText = "test" }).ToList(); } public struct SearchItem { public string ControllerAction; public string LinkText; public string id; }

  Read the article

• LINQ to XML Query Help

  - by cw

  Hello, I am trying to get a "diff" of 2 xml documents and end up with a list of Elements that are different. Below is the XML, I was wondering if anyone can assist. In the case below, I want the list to contain the "file2.xml" element and the "file3.xml" element because they are both different or new than the first xml document. Thanks in advance! <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <versioninfo> <files> <file version="1.0">file1.xml</file> <file version="1.0">file2.xml</file> </files> </versioninfo> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <versioninfo> <files> <file version="1.0">file1.xml</file> <file version="1.1">file2.xml</file> <file version="1.0">file3.xml</file> </files> </versioninfo>

  Read the article

• LINQ to SQL repository - caching data

  - by creativeincode

  I have built my first MVC solution and used the repository pattern for retrieving/inserting/updating my database. I am now in the process of refactoring and I've noticed that a lot of (in fact all) the methods within my repository are hitting the database everytime. This seems overkill and what I'd ideally like is to do is 'cache' the main data object e.g. 'GetAllAdverts' from the database and to then query against this cached object for things like 'FindAdvert(id), AddAdvert(), DeleteAdvert() etc..' I'd also need to consider updating/deleting/adding records to this cache object and the database. What is the best apporoach for something like this? My knowledge of this type of things is minimal and really looking for advice/guidance/tutorial to point me in the right direction. Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• Return an empty collection when Linq where returns nothing

  - by ahsteele

  I am using the below statement with the intent of getting all of the machine objects from the MachineList collection (type IEnumerable) that have a MachineStatus of i. The MachineList collection will not always contain machines with a status of i. At times when no machines have a MachineStatus of i I'd like to return an empty collection. My call to ActiveMachines (which is used first) works but InactiveMachines does not. public IEnumerable<Machine> ActiveMachines { get { return Customer.MachineList .Where(m => m.MachineStatus == "a"); } } public IEnumerable<Machine> InactiveMachines { get { return Customer.MachineList .Where(m => m.MachineStatus == "i"); } } Edit Upon further examination it appears that any enumeration of MachineList will cause subsequent enumerations of MachineList to throw an exeception: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. Therefore, it doesn't matter if a call is made to ActiveMachines or InactiveMachines as its an issue with the MachineList collection. This is especially troubling because I can break calls to MachineList simply by enumerating it in a Watch before it is called in code. At its lowest level MachineList implements NHibernate.IQuery being returned as an IEnumerable. What's causing MachineList to lose its contents after an initial enumeration?

  Read the article

• LINQ Join 2 List<T>s

  - by David Murdoch

  Preface: I don't understand what this does: o => o.ID, i => i.ID, (o, id) => o So go easy on me. :-) I have 2 lists that I need to join together: // contains ALL contacts for a customer. // Each item has a unique ID. // There are no duplicates. ContactCollection list1 = myCustomer.GetContacts(); // contains the customer contacts (in list1) relevant to a REPORT // the items in this list may have properties that differ from those in list1. /*****/// e.g.: /*****/ bool SelectedForNotification; /*****/// may be different. ContactCollection list2 = myReport.GetContacts(); I need to create a third ContactCollection that contains all of the contacts in list1 but with the properties of the items in list2, if they are there (list3.Count == list1.Count). I feel as though I'm not making any sense. So, please ask questions in the comments and I'll try to clarify.

  Read the article

• substring with linq??

  - by phenevo

  I've got collection of words, and i wanna create collection from this collection limited to 5 chars Input: Car Collection Limited stackoverflow Output: car colle limit stack word.Substring(0,5) throws exception (length) word.Take(10) is not good idea, too... Any good ideas ??

  Read the article

• linq merge elements with orderby

  - by Sanja Melnichuk

  Hi all. I need to select all terminals sorted by Attributes[2] // get all query IQueryable<ITerminal> itt = repository.Terminals.GetQuery(); // get all with Attributes[2] IQueryable<ITerminal> itt2 = itt .Select(item => new { attrs = item.Attributes[2], term = item }) .OrderBy(x => x.attrs) .Select(x => x.term); Now how to select from itt all terminals but ordered by itt2 results? How to order them by itt2? Example: itt = c,d,r,a,w,b itt2 = a,b,c // after select and after merge: a,b,c d,r,w Thanks all

  Read the article

• LINQ method chaining and granular error handling

  - by Clafou

  I have a method which can be written pretty neatly through method chaining: return viewer.ServerReport.GetParameters() .Single(p => p.Name == Convention.Ssrs.RegionParamName) .ValidValues .Select(v => v.Value); However I'd like to be able to do some checks at each point as I wish to provide helpful diagnostics information if any of the chained methods returns unexpected results. To achieve this, I need to break up all my chaining and follow each call with an if block. It makes the code a lot less readable. Ideally I'd like to be able to weave in some chained method calls which would allow me to handle unexpected outcomes at each point (e.g. throw a meaningful exception such as new ConventionException("The report contains no parameter") if the first method returns an empty collection). Can anyone suggest a simple way to achieve such a thing?

  Read the article

• Submitting changes to 2 tables with C# linq only one table is changing

  - by Laurence Burke

  SO I am changing the values in 2 different tables and the only table changing is the address table any one know why? protected void btnSubmit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { TestDataClassDataContext dc = new TestDataClassDataContext(); var addr = (from a in dc.Addresses where a.AddressID == Convert.ToInt32(ddlAddList.SelectedValue) select a).FirstOrDefault(); var caddr = (from ca in dc.CustomerAddresses where addr.AddressID == ca.AddressID select ca).FirstOrDefault(); if (txtZip.Text != "" && txtAdd1.Text != "" && txtCity.Text != "") { addr.AddressLine1 = txtAdd1.Text; addr.AddressLine2 = txtAdd2.Text; addr.City = txtCity.Text; addr.PostalCode = txtZip.Text; addr.StateProvinceID = Convert.ToInt32(ddlState.SelectedValue); caddr.AddressTypeID = Convert.ToInt32(ddlAddrType.SelectedValue); dc.SubmitChanges(); lblErrMsg.Visible = false; lblSuccess.Visible = true; } else { lblErrMsg.Text = "Invalid Input"; lblErrMsg.Visible = true; } }

  Read the article

• Using LINQ to remove dupicates in dictionary and the count of those duplicates

  - by Robert

  I have some code that returns unique elements in my dictionary, but I would also like to return the count of the duplicate elements. Basically change dictionary[key, uniqueelement] to dictionary[uniqueelement, count]. Here is my code that just returns the unique elements. var uniqueItems = deviceInstances.Children.GroupBy(pair => pair.Value.Information.UnderlyingDeviceType) .Select(group => group.First()) .ToDictionary(pair => pair.Key, pair => pair.Value.Information.UnderlyingDeviceType.ToString());

  Read the article

• Referencing object's identity before submitting changes in LINQ

  - by Axarydax

  Hi, is there a way of knowing ID of identity column of record inserted via InsertOnSubmit beforehand, e.g. before calling datasource's SubmitChanges? Imagine I'm populating some kind of hierarchy in the database, but I wouldn't want to submit changes on each recursive call of each child node (e.g. if I had Directories table and Files table and am recreating my filesystem structure in the database). I'd like to do it that way, so I create a Directory object, set its name and attributes, then InsertOnSubmit it into DataContext.Directories collection, then reference Directory.ID in its child Files. Currently I need to call InsertOnSubmit to insert the 'directory' into the database and the database mapping fills its ID column. But this creates a lot of transactions and accesses to database and I imagine that if I did this inserting in a batch, the performance would be better. What I'd like to do is to somehow use Directory.ID before commiting changes, create all my File and Directory objects in advance and then do a big submit that puts all stuff into database. I'm also open to solving this problem via a stored procedure, I assume the performance would be even better if all operations would be done directly in the database.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70  | Next Page >