Search Results

Search found 37654 results on 1507 pages for 'function prototypes'.

Page 668/1507 | < Previous Page | 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675  | Next Page >

  • overwriting arguments in t-sql functions

    - by chuck taylor
    I was playing around with some code and realized that it is possible to overwrite the argument to a t-sql function. i.e., create function someFn(@date date) as begin if @date is null set @date = getdate() will set @date to be today's date if the argument was null. This appears only to make any sense if t-sql is treating their arguments as references not values. I realized that I don't actually know what the t-sql rules are for cases like this and was hoping someone could elaborate what is going on here. (I don't ever recall seeing any value vs. reference discussion with respect to t-sql code for that matter actually..)

    Read the article

  • Beginner C++ Question

    - by Donal Rafferty
    I have followed the code example here toupper c++ example And implemented it in my own code as follows void CharString::MakeUpper() { char* str[strlen(m_pString)]; int i=0; str[strlen(m_pString)]=m_pString; char* c; while (str[i]) { c=str[i]; putchar (toupper(c)); i++; } } But this gives me the following compiler error CharString.cpp: In member function 'void CharString::MakeUpper()': CharString.cpp:276: error: invalid conversion from 'char*' to 'int' CharString.cpp:276: error: initializing argument 1of 'int toupper(int)' CharString.cpp: In member function 'void CharString::MakeLower()': This is line 276 putchar (toupper(c)); I understand that toupper is looking for int as a parameter and returns an int also, is that the problem? If so how does the example work?

    Read the article

  • IE8 Slide Toggle Issue

    - by jef2904
    Im having some trouble with jQuery's slideToggle function in IE8 for some reason the DIV its opening closes immediately after its opened heres the code im using $("h3 a").click(function(){ id = $(this).attr("href"); $(id).slideToggle("slow"); }); and the HTML <h3><a href="#promo-materials">Graphic and Pormotional Materials</a></h3> <div id="promo-materials" class="center gallery"> <a href="images/portfolio/bistro.png" rel="facebox"> <img src="images/portfolio/thumbs/bistro.png" alt="" /> </a> <a href="images/portfolio/direct-savings.png" rel="facebox"> <img src="images/portfolio/thumbs/direct-savings.png" alt="" /> </a> </div> Here is a link to the functional page it works in all other browsers including IE7

    Read the article

  • AJAX Problem - No response text in FireFox, but ok in IE

    - by Taiba
    Hi, I am making a simple AJAX call to an external site. It works ok in IE, but in Firefox, not response text is returned. I think it might have something to do with the response being "chunked", but I'm not sure. Any ideas? Thanks. function loadXMLDoc() { var xmlhttp; var urlString = "http://drc.edeliver.com.au/ratecalc.asp?Pickup_Postcode=6025&Destination_Postcode=6055&Country=AU&Weight=100&Service_Type=STANDARD&Length=100&Width=100&Height=100&Quantity=2"; if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {// code for IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest(); } else {// code for IE6, IE5 xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=function() { if (xmlhttp.readyState==4) { window.alert(xmlhttp.responseText); } } xmlhttp.open("GET", urlString, true); xmlhttp.send(); }

    Read the article

  • C# array problem

    - by user208080
    Hi there. I am a newbie in C# and here are 2 questions: I have a 2d array a[3,3], how can I express one dimension as a new array and pass to some function. i.e. int[,] a = new int[3,3]; a[0,0] = 1; ... string b = concatenate(a[0]); // where concatenate is a function take a one dimension array as param Can I create a 65000x65000 array with C#? I got some "out of memory" error. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Unable to send an associative array in JSON format in Zend to client

    - by Anorflame
    Hi, In one of my actions in a controller, I'm using the json view helper to send back a response to an ajax request. On the client side I alert the data that is passed to the success callback function. It works fine as long as the response is a number or an array with default keys. Once I try to send an associative array, it alerts with [object Object]. Server code: $childArray = array('key'=>'value'); $this->_helper->json($childArray); javascript: function displayChildren(data){ alert(data); } ... $.ajax({ url: "/po/add", dataType: "json", data: {format: "json"}, success: displayChildren }); I have no idea what am I doing wrong here, so any help would be appreciated...

    Read the article

  • Visibility of elements by ID

    - by dragonfly
    Hi, how come that when I attach onchange by attribute and call it onchange="validateDate(FPR_CURR_FROM);" it works, but when I use a ASP .NET validator, and my attached function is called like : function anonymous() { ValidatorOnChange(event); validateDate(FPR_CURR_FROM); } I get error: FPR_CURR_FROM is undefined. First off: I know that using FPR_CURR_FROM to access element is BAD, and I should use getElementByID etc... And I will change it eventually. But as I bumped into that code, I'm curious what caused it - propably visibility of variables I guess.

    Read the article

  • Why doesn't variable img increase?

    - by Annette B
    I can upload image but the sprite name remains pict1 each time I upload another image. Why doesn't imgVal function increase? function imgVal() { img += 1; trace("image: pict" + img); } imgVal(); _fla.lights_mc.visible=false; _fla.lights_mc.stop(); _fla.pre_mc.fill_mc.stop(); _fla.pre_mc.visible=false; var sprite:Sprite=new Sprite(); sprite.addChild(loader); sprite.name = "pict" + img; //trace(sprite.name); _fla.myBorder.box.addChild(sprite); I'd like each sprite to be given a new name like pict1, pict2, pict3, etc but img variable is not increasing. I think this is where my problem occurs. Would someone please help?

    Read the article

  • how to get change event on created fields in jquery

    - by frosty
    I have some jquery code the creates an quantity text box. Like so <input type="text" value="1000" class="qty" name="[0].Quantity"> I wish to add some validation to this text box but can hit the method. I believe i need to utlise Live(). But can't quite figure out how this is implemented. This is where i'm at $(document).ready(function () { $(".qty").change(checkValue); }); function checkValue() { alert("on change"); }

    Read the article

  • Tools for understanding large codebase

    - by 0tar0gz
    Hi! My whole life I have been programming in simple plain text editor. Lately, I was contemplating about joining an open source project which is fairly large and written in C. I downloaded the sources, started to look around, read this, forget that... Then I thought to myself: this can't be true. This is 21st century there must be some tool which would help me to understand the code, perhaps some kind of IDE or "code navigator". What flows from here to where, this typedef struct is just interface to that private type, this function is just #define from above, function called in this file is defined in that file, ... you get the idea. Dear Stack Overflow, is this 21st century? Is there something like this?

    Read the article

  • What's the recommended way to create an HTML elemnt and bind a listener to it using jQuery?

    - by Bytecode Ninja
    At the moment I achieve this using something like this: var myElem = "<tr id='tr-1'><td>content</td></tr>"; $("#myTable").append(myElem); $("#tr-1").click(function() { // blah blah }); Traditionally, when I wasn't using jQuery, I used to do something like this: var myElem = document.createElement(...); var myTable = document.getElementById("myTable"); myTable.appendChild(myElem); myElem.onclick = function() { // blah blah } The thing is, in the second approach I already have a reference to myElem and I don't have to scan the DOM ($("#tr-1")) to find it, like the jQuery approach, and hence it should be much faster especially in big pages. Isn't there a better jQuery-ish way to accomplish this task?

    Read the article

  • Why is order important in moving from tab to tab programmatically (and new in 1.8.10

    - by Bruce
    Hi folks, Up until I updated to jquery-ui-1.8.10 (already using jQuery 1.5), the following code has worked as expected: case 'baseeditor': $('#tab1').html(responseText).fadeIn(500, function() { ... load the contents of the tab and stuff... }); $("#prolearn").tabs("select",1); break; case ... The tab is fueled and then focus is moved from tab0 (from where the ajax call is initiated) to tab1. Now, that code won't work, but this version does: case 'baseeditor': $("#prolearn").tabs("select",1); $('#tab1').html(responseText).fadeIn(500, function() { ... load the contents of the tab and stuff... }); break; case ... Can someone explain the difference - have I just been lucky getting away with my original version? Thanks/Bruce

    Read the article

  • Mongoose 3.1.0: Why the callback in the connection.db.dropDatabase(callback) is never called?

    - by Totty
    Code: var connection = mongoose.createConnection('mongodb://localhost:9000/' + databaseName); connection.db.dropDatabase(function(err){ // never reach this point! debugger; console.log(err); console.log('-------------->Dropped database: ' + databaseName); }); If I do connection.open it says that it's already opening and no multiple calls to "open" are supported for the same connection. Even this doesn't work var conn = mongoose.createConnection('mongodb://localhost',databaseName, 9000, {}, function(){ console.log('created'); // is reached conn.db.dropDatabase(callback); // but the callback is not called anyway }); What is the problem? ("mongoose": "3.1.0") thanks

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to access JSON properties with relative syntax when using JSON defined functions?

    - by Justin Vincent
    // JavaScript JSON var myCode = { message : "Hello World", helloWorld : function() { alert(this.message); } }; myCode.helloWorld(); The above JavaScript code will alert 'undefined'. To make it work for real the code would need to look like the following... (note the literal path to myCode.message) // JavaScript JSON var myCode = { message : "Hello World", helloWorld : function() { alert(myCode.message); } }; myCode.helloWorld(); My question is... if I declare functions using json in this way, is there some "relative" way to get access to myCode.message or is it only possible to do so using the literal namespace path myCode.message?

    Read the article

  • f# string.Format

    - by mamu
    I am writing my first f# library i am trying to use string.Format and it complains that no such function Is it not available or am i doing something wrong

    Read the article

  • How to find hidden properties/methods in Javascript objects?

    - by ramanujan
    I would like to automatically determine all of the properties (including the hidden ones) in a given Javascript object, via a generalization of this function: function keys(obj) { var ll = []; for(var pp in obj) { ll.push(pp); } return ll; } This works for user defined objects but fails for many builtins: repl> keys({"a":10,"b":2}); // ["a","b"] repl> keys(Math) // returns nothing! Basically, I'd like to write equivalents of Python's dir() and help(), which are really useful in exploring new objects. My understanding is that only the builtin objects have hidden properties (user code evidently can't set the "enumerable" property till HTML5), so one possibility is to simply hardcode the properties of Math, String, etc. into a dir() equivalent (using the lists such as those here). But is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • Using arrays in Jquery

    - by Tom
    Here is a code: <input type="button" id="array[1]" value="Value1" /> <input type="button" id="array[2]" value="Value2" /> <input type="button" id="array[3]" value="Value3" /> And I want to do something like that: $('#array').click(function() { id = this.id; $.ajax({ here goes type, url, data and else }); }) I want to id add array's number. For example, if I click button where id is array[3] so id gets value of 3 in Jquery's function. Hope you got what I mean.

    Read the article

  • jQuery animate slidding background image using mouse position wont stop... just keeps going

    - by simian
    I have a neat little jQuery script I am working on. Goal: parent div with overflow hidden holds a larger div with image. When I move the mouse to the left or right of the parent div, the div with image changes margin-left to move left or right. Problem is... if I move the mouse out of the parent div (left or right), the image keeps going. I need the image to stop when the mouse is not on the inside left or right edge of the parent div. Any ideas? <!DOCTYPE html> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-latest.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> //<![CDATA[ jQuery.noConflict (); jQuery(document).ready(function(){ jQuery('#container').mousemove(function(e){ var parentWidth = jQuery('#container').width(); var parentWidthLeft = Math.round(.1 * jQuery('#container').width()); var parentWidthRight = Math.round(jQuery('#container').width() - parentWidthLeft); var parentHeight = jQuery('#container').height(); var parentOffset = jQuery('#container').offset(); var X = Math.round(e.pageX - parentOffset.left); var Y = Math.round(e.pageY - parentOffset.top); if (X<parentWidthLeft) { jQuery('#image').animate({'left': '-' + parentWidth }, 5000); } if (X>parentWidthRight) { jQuery('#image').animate({'left': parentWidth }, 5000); } if (X<=parentWidthRight && X>=parentWidthLeft) { jQuery('#image').stop(); } if (X<1) { jQuery('#image').stop(); } }); jQuery('#container').mouseleave(function(){ jQuery('#image').stop(); }); }); // ]]> </script> </head> <body> <div id="container" style="width: 500px; height: 500px; overflow: hidden; border: 10px solid #000; position: relative; margin: auto auto;"> <div id="image" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;"><img src="http://dump4free.com/imgdump/1/Carmen-Electra_1wallpaper1024x768.jpg" alt="" /></div> </div> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • Better way to find Class in event.target parentnodes using jquery and javascript?

    - by Cama
    Currently, I check the target of the input box keyup event to see if it is contained within a div wit class "editorRow" using: var $parentClass = event.target.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.className; Is there a better way to do this in case extra markup is added between the div and the span tags? <div class="editorRow"> <li> <span class="wi1"> <input type="text" value="" style="width: 80px;" name="LineItems9" id="LineItems_9"> </span> </li> </div>   $("input").live("keyup", function(event) { return GiveDynamicFieldsLife(event); }); function GiveDynamicFieldsLife(event) { **var $parentClass = event.target.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.className;** if ($parentClass == "editorRow") { //Do Stuff } }

    Read the article

  • passing variables with JQuery

    - by vick
    <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> $(document).ready(function() { $("a").click(function() { $("#myDiv").load( "job_board_data.php", { pageNo: $(this).text()} ); return false; }); }); </script> <a href="job_board_data.php?p=1">1</a> How can I pass variables to my job_board_data.php script???? I want to pass variables such as page, sort by .. anyone?

    Read the article

  • Ruby on Rails: Modules vs. Classes

    - by Jack
    I'm trying to add a function that will be accessible throughout all parts of my program. I want something like: def GlobalFunctions.my_function(x,y) puts x + y end to be accessible for all models. Specifically I am trying to use a function like this in my seeds.rb file but I am most likely going to be reusing the code and don't want any redundancy. Now I know I can make a simple class, but I could also make a module. What are some reasons to go in either direction? And once I've decided on which type to use, how do I make it accessible throughout the whole program? I have tried a module, but I keep getting " Expected app/[module file] to define [ModuleName]"

    Read the article

  • (PHP) 1)How to genrate Secreate key on User & Client Side ? 3) How to Compare Server side MD5 and Client side Md5 ?

    - by user557994
    /* In Below Code .. My problem is that 1) How to genrate Secreate key on User Side ? 2) How to genrate Secreate key on Client Side ? 3) How to Compare Server side MD5 and Client side Md5 ? Can you solve my problem ? */ $gid = $_GET['id']; if($gid=="") { $filename = "counter.txt"; $fp = fopen( $filename, "r" ) or die("Couldn't Generate Whiteboard"); while ( ! feof( $fp ) ) { $countfile = fgets( $fp); $countfile++; } fclose( $fp ); $fp = fopen( $filename, "w" ) or die("Couldn't generate whiteboard"); fwrite( $fp, $countfile ); fclose( $fp ); $doc = new DOMDocument('1.0', 'UTF-8'); $ele = $doc-createElement( 'root' ); $ele-nodeValue = $uvar; $doc-appendChild( $ele ); $test = $doc-save("$countfile.xml"); genkey($id); echo ""; $uvar=$_POST['msgval']; exit; } else { if($uvar == "") { $xdoc = new DOMDocument( '1.0', 'UTF-8' ); $xdoc-Load("$gid.xml"); $candidate = $xdoc-getElementsByTagName('root')-item(0); $newElement = $xdoc -createElement('root'); $txtNode = $xdoc -createTextNode ($root); $newElement - appendChild($txtNode); $candidate - appendChild($newElement); $msg = $candidate-nodeValue; } } function genkey($id) { $encrypt_key = "GJHsahakst1468464a"; $key = MD5("$id","$$encrypt_key"); return $key; } ? function sendRequest() { var uvar = document.getElementById('txtHint').value; var xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); xmlhttp.onreadystatechange = function() { if(xmlhttp.readyState == 4 && xmlhttp.status==200) { document.getElementById('txtHint').value = ""; } } xmlhttp.open("POST","post.php?id=",true); xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Content-type","application/x-www-form-urlencoded"); xmlhttp.send("umsg="+uvar); return; } Msg " /

    Read the article

  • Jquery menu help please

    - by Trai Tran
    I am having trouble with this menu, when I hover to the subcategories they keep slideup. I want the subcategories to remain when I hover it and when I move my mouse outside it will slideup, same go to the main categories. Please help. I had been working on this for 1 hour but no solution. $(document).ready(function(){ $('ul#level1').slideUp(); $('a#tab').hover(function(){ var content_show = $(this).attr('title'); $('.'+ content_show).stop().slideDown(); },function(){ var content_show = $(this).attr('title'); $('.'+ content_show).stop().slideUp(); }); }); <li><a href="#" id="tab" class="active" title="one">Sport</a> <ul id="level1" class="one"> <li><a href="#">View All</a></li> <li><a href="#" >Shoes</a></li> <li><a href="#" >T-Shirt</a></li> <li><a href="#" >Tools</a></li> <li><a href="#" >Hats</a></li> <li><a href="#">Pants</a></li> </ul> </li> <li><a href="#" id="tab" class="tab" title="two">Foods</a> <ul id="level1" class="two"> <li><a href="#">Link Here</a></li> <li><a href="#">Link Here</a></li> <li><a href="#">Link Here</a></li> <li><a href="#">Link Here</a></li> <li><a href="#">Link Here</a></li> </ul> </li>

    Read the article

  • Is it OK to put a standard, pure C header #include directive inside a namespace?

    - by mic_e
    I've got a project with a class log in the global namespace (::log). So, naturally, after #include <cmath>, the compiler gives an error message each time I try to instantiate an object of my log class, because <cmath> pollutes the global namespace with lots of three-letter methods, one of them being the logarithm function log(). So there are three possible solutions, each having their unique ugly side-effects. Move the log class to it's own namespace and always access it with it's fully qualified name. I really want to avoid this because the logger should be as convenient as possible to use. Write a mathwrapper.cpp file which is the only file in the project that includes <cmath>, and makes all the required <cmath> functions available through wrappers in a namespace math. I don't want to use this approach because I have to write a wrapper for every single required math function, and it would add additional call penalty (cancelled out partially by the -flto compiler flag) The solution I'm currently considering: Replace #include <cmath> by namespace math { #include "math.h" } and then calculating the logarithm function via math::log(). I have tried it out and it does, indeed, compile, link and run as expected. It does, however, have multiple downsides: It's (obviously) impossible to use <cmath>, because the <cmath> code accesses the functions by their fully qualified names, and it's deprecated to use in C++. I've got a really, really bad feeling about it, like I'm gonna get attacked and eaten alive by raptors. So my question is: Is there any recommendation/convention/etc that forbid putting include directives in namespaces? Could anything go wrong with diferent C standard library implementations (I use glibc), different compilers (I use g++ 4.7, -std=c++11), linking? Have you ever tried doing this? Are there any alternate ways to banish the math functions from the global namespace? I've found several similar questions on stackoverflow, but most were about including other C++ headers, which obviously is a bad idea, and those that weren't made contradictory statements about linking behaviour for C libraries. Also, would it be beneficial to additionally put the #include <math.h> inside extern "C" {}?

    Read the article

  • Drawing Image onto Canvas Stretches Image?

    - by Fred Finkle
    I have this code (stolen from the web): function readIt() { var reader = new FileReader(); reader.onload = (function(e) { var img = new Image(); img.src = e.target.result; var c = document.getElementById("canvas"); var ctx = c.getContext("2d"); ctx.drawImage(img, 0, 0); } ); reader.readAsDataURL(document.getElementById('userImage').files[0]); } Which works up to a point. The canvas's width and height are set to the size of the image, but only the top left of the image appears - It appears to be stretched so it fits all the space allocated to the canvas (enough to display the whole image - 615px x 615px). If I add an <img> element sized the same size as the canvas and point the src to the image in the file system it appears perfect. I'm using Chrome, but it appears the same in Firefox. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675  | Next Page >