Search Results

Search found 37844 results on 1514 pages for 'function composition'.

Page 673/1514 | < Previous Page | 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680  | Next Page >

  • need help revising this javascript that opens to a new window on submit/post

    - by Brad
    I have a form that once you select from a drop-down list and select submit, it is suppose to open up to a new window Here is the code that is currently on the page and I think it needs to be completely wiped out or revised, it only works in IE and Firefox <SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" TYPE="text/javascript"> //<!-- Hide JavaScript from older browsers // Function to open a window function windowOpen(window_url) { helpWin = window.open(window_url,'','toolbar=yes,status=no,scrollbars=yes,menubar=yes,resizable=yes,directories=no,location=no,width=350,height=400'); if (document.images) { if (helpWin) helpWin.focus() } } // End script hiding --> </SCRIPT>

    Read the article

  • Mysterious logging.basicConfig problem (Python)

    - by Max
    I'm writing a Python script to retrieve data from Flickr. For logging purposes, I have the following setup function: def init_log(logfile): format = '%(asctime)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s' logging.basicConfig(filename=logfile,level=logging.DEBUG,format=format) I've tested this using the python shell and it works as expected, creating a file if one doesn't already exist. But calling it from within my program is where it stops working. The function is definitely being called, and the logfile parameter is working properly – logging.basicConfig just isn't creating any file. I'm not even getting any errors or warnings. My use of the Python Flickr API may be the culprit, but I doubt it. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • basic modal dialog problem

    - by senzacionale
    image for opening popup. <div id='basic-modal'> <a href="#"><input type="image" name="HelpHealthCenter" class="basic" id="imgHelpHealthCenter" tabindex="-1" title="Some text that will display" src="/images/help.gif" style="border-width:0px;" /></a> </div> i am using basic modal dialog (first demo) in thi link: http://www.ericmmartin.com/projects/simplemodal-demos/ This is JS for opening popup windows jQuery(function ($) { $('#basic-modal .basic').click(function (e) { $('#basic-modal-content').modal(); return false; }); }); but i want to read title="" from image instead of reading text from "basic-modal-content" div when popup is opened. <div id="basic-modal-content"> text on popup window </div> Thx for help.

    Read the article

  • In Python, is there a way to call a method on every item of an iterable? [closed]

    - by Thane Brimhall
    Possible Duplicate: Is there a map without result in python? I often come to a situation in my programs when I want to quickly/efficiently call an in-place method on each of the items contained by an iterable. (Quickly meaning the overhead of a for loop is unacceptable). A good example would be a list of sprites when I want to call draw() on each of the Sprite objects. I know I can do something like this: [sprite.draw() for sprite in sprite_list] But I feel like the list comprehension is misused since I'm not using the returned list. The same goes for the map function. Stone me for premature optimization, but I also don't want the overhead of the return value. What I want to know is if there's a method in Python that lets me do what I just explained, perhaps like the hypothetical function I suggest below: do_all(sprite_list, draw)

    Read the article

  • Remove a DIV using a link

    - by GSTAR
    HTML: <div class="row"> <!-- content --> <a href="#" class="remove">remove</a> </div> JS: $('.remove').click(function(){ $(this).parent().remove(); return false; }); If there is only one DIV it works OK but when there are multiple DIVS (class="row") it won't do anything. No errors are returned either. EDIT: I should add that by default there is only one div - additional divs get dynamically created using a jQuery clone function - perhaps this is why it won't recognise the new link/div?

    Read the article

  • contain new elements of an "instance" in javascript

    - by iamnotmad
    Hi, so I know there are tons of ways to simulate inheritance and other OO features. I have chosen one to use for my project and am wondering if I can create an instance and add stuff to it and keep it contained (within braces). Consider the following: function BaseClass(){ <this.stuff here> } function SubClass(){ this.superClass = BaseClass(); this.superClass(); <this.other stuff here> } myObj = new SubClass(); so myObj is an instance of SubClass. I can add things to myObj like: myObj.blah = "funtimes"; What I would like is to be able to add stuff to the "instance" and keep it organized in braces much like the constructor. psuedo code like: myObj = new SubClass() { var blah = "funtimes" <more instance specific stuff here> } Is something like this possible? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • boost scoped_lock mutex crashes

    - by JahSumbar
    hello, I have protected a std::queue's access functions, push, pop, size, with boost::mutexes and boost::mutex::scoped_lock in these functions from time to time it crashes in a scoped lock the call stack is this: 0 0x0040f005 boost::detail::win32::interlocked_bit_test_and_set include/boost/thread/win32/thread_primitives.hpp 361 1 0x0040e879 boost::detail::basic_timed_mutex::timed_lock include/boost/thread/win32/basic_timed_mutex.hpp 68 2 0x0040e9d3 boost::detail::basic_timed_mutex::lock include/boost/thread/win32/basic_timed_mutex.hpp 64 3 0x0040b96b boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex>::lock include/boost/thread/locks.hpp 349 4 0x0040b998 unique_lock include/boost/thread/locks.hpp 227 5 0x00403837 MyClass::inboxSize - this is my inboxSize function that uses this code: MyClass::inboxSize () { boost::mutex::scoped_lock scoped_lock(m_inboxMutex); return m_inbox.size(); } and the mutex is declared like this: boost::mutex m_inboxMutex; it crashes at the last pasted line in this function: inline bool interlocked_bit_test_and_set(long* x,long bit) { long const value=1<<bit; long old=*x; and x has this value: 0xababac17 Thanks for the help

    Read the article

  • How to find hidden properties/methods in Javascript objects?

    - by ramanujan
    I would like to automatically determine all of the properties (including the hidden ones) in a given Javascript object, via a generalization of this function: function keys(obj) { var ll = []; for(var pp in obj) { ll.push(pp); } return ll; } This works for user defined objects but fails for many builtins: repl> keys({"a":10,"b":2}); // ["a","b"] repl> keys(Math) // returns nothing! Basically, I'd like to write equivalents of Python's dir() and help(), which are really useful in exploring new objects. My understanding is that only the builtin objects have hidden properties (user code evidently can't set the "enumerable" property till HTML5), so one possibility is to simply hardcode the properties of Math, String, etc. into a dir() equivalent (using the lists such as those here). But is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • Image Replacement (JS/JQuery) working in IE but not FF

    - by Sunburnt Ginger
    I have tried multiple solutions for replacing broken images (both JS & jQuery) and all work perfectly with IE but not in FF, is there a reason for this? Are images handled differently in FF that may cause this? JQuery Example: $("img").error(function(){ $(this).unbind("error").attr("src", "nopic.jpg"); }); Javascript Example: (triggered by onError event in img tag) function noimage(img){ img.onerror=""; img.src="nopic.jpg"; return true; } Both of these examples work perfectly in IE but not at all in FF. What gives? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Why can't I open a new window on my jquery ajax callback?

    - by KyleGobel
    to show my problem in a couple examples... THIS WORKS $.post("SomePage.aspx", { name : "value" }, function (data) { alert(data); }, "text"); THIS DOESN'T WORK $.post("SomePage.aspx", { name : "value" }, function (data) { window.open("http://www.google.com"); }, "text"); In the first example, I get alerted with what i'm expecting. In the second example, nothing happens. No window is opened. If I add an alert or something before or after the window.open call, the alert works fine, but the window doesn't open. If I add a window.open completly after the $.post method, the window opens fine (of course this doens't help me at all). I'm wondering why I can't open a window in the callback. What do I have to do to be able to open a window? I'd like to open a window to show some fancy results. Any help is appreciated, thanks.

    Read the article

  • Toggled() text input field not working in IE6 in Jquery 1.3.2

    - by Michal
    In IE6 after showing() or toggling() an initially hidden text input field it is impossible to enter any text in the box. It is also impossible to focus() on the element. I am using jquery 1.3.2 Here is the code... Any ideas? $(document).ready(function(){ $(".hide").click(function(){ $(".form").toggle(); }) }) and HTML <form> <div class="hide"> Show </div> <div class="form" style="display:none"> <input type="text" name="crap"> </div> </form>

    Read the article

  • where should this check logic go?

    - by Benny
    I have a function that draw a string on graphics: private void DrawSmallImage(Graphics g) { if (this.SmallImage == null) return; var smallPicHeight = this.Height / 5; var x = this.ClientSize.Width - smallPicHeight; var y = this.ClientSize.Height - smallPicHeight; g.DrawImage(this.SmallImage, x, y, smallPicHeight, smallPicHeight); } the check if (this.SmallImage == null) return; should be in the function DrawSmallImage or should be in the caller? which is better?

    Read the article

  • dojo TimeTextBox don't listen to on blur event

    - by kawtousse
    Hi everyone, I want to add an on blur event to a dojo timetextbox but the event never been runned so the declaration of the timetextbox is like this: <label>End</label><input id="endp" name="endp" onBlur="calculateTimeSpent2(startp,endp,output);" /> the javascript function is like this: function calculateTimeSpent2(startp,endp,outputp) { var tmp0=document.getElementById('startp').value.split(':'); var tmp1=document.getElementById('endp').value.split(':'); if (tmp0[0]!='' && tmp1[0]!='') { var val1= findtime(tmp0[0],tmp0[1],tmp1[0],tmp1[1]); var tmp=val1.split(':'); if (tmp[0].indexOf('-')==-1) document.getElementById('outputp').value=val1; else { alert ("Start Time must be lower than End Time "); document.getElementById('endp').focus(); } } } I don't understand why dojo didn't execute the event correctly while loosing the focus. I tried to put the type=text but it does'nt work. Thanks for help.

    Read the article

  • How do I make this linkButton custom component work?

    - by Adam
    package { import mx.controls.LinkButton; import flash.text.TextLineMetrics; public class multiLineLinkButton extends LinkButton { override protected function createChildren():void { super.createChildren(); if (textField){ textField.wordWrap = true; textField.multiline = true; } } override public function measureText(s:String):TextLineMetrics { textField.text = s; var lineMetrics:TextLineMetrics = textField.getLineMetrics(0); lineMetrics.width = textField.textWidth; lineMetrics.height = textField.textHeight; return lineMetrics; } } my issue here is if you use this component you will see that the text is bunched up into a very small area. It does not fill the entire width of the linkButton. Anyone know why this is happening?

    Read the article

  • Get Element with jQuery .on()

    - by Gabriel Ryan Nahmias
    If I'm using jQuery's .on() function like this (there's more to it but this is the main problem area extracted): $(document).on("click", $("#contcont a, #leftnav li a, #leftnav li ul a, #mainarea-home a").not(".secitem-mid a") , function clicker(event, sData) { var $this = $(this); sHREF = $this.attr("href"); alert(sHREF); } ); I'm getting undefined so what would be the best way to actually get the element that's being clicked? I need .on() so that it always occurs, obviously, instead of having to attach it to all the elements every time new data is loaded (this is through Yahoo! stores so it's a necessity to do it this way). Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to rotate a figure without moving around the stage(actionscript)

    - by Mister PHP
    package { import flash.display.MovieClip; import flash.events.Event; public class Bullet extends MovieClip { private var mc:MovieClip; public function Bullet() { mc = new MovieClip(); mc.graphics.beginFill(0); mc.graphics.drawRect(120, 120, 40, 40); mc.graphics.endFill(); addChild(mc); addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, onEnterFrame); } private function onEnterFrame(e:Event):void{ mc.rotation += 10; } } } how can i make the rotation of the circle without moving him around the stage, just staying in the place he was before and just rotate, not moving anywhere is that posible?? if you try this code you'll see that the circle is rotating and moving around the stage, so that i don't want, how can i change this?

    Read the article

  • Flash: How to get a list to be processed synchronous instead of asynchronous?

    - by Quandary
    Question: In Flash I have the below function. Now the problem is SaveFurniture, SavePolygons and SaveComments all save to the same XML file. Now SaveFurniture sends JSON encoded data to a ashx handler, which saves it in the xml on the server. The problem is, because flash sends the data asynchronous, the polygons get sent to the polygonsave ashx handler, but before saving of the furniture has completed, thus access error, write process already in progress... // cSaveData.SaveData(); public static function SaveData():void { trace("cSaveData.SaveData"); //NotifyASPXofNewScale(cGlobals.nPlanScale); SaveFurniture(); SavePolygons(); SaveComments(); } What's the best way to process this list, ONE AFTER ANOTHER ? Making a callback in all of them does make the program flow structure very confusing...

    Read the article

  • getting the names of elements in JS/jQuery

    - by Mala
    I have some checkbox inputs like so: <input type="checkbox" name="1" class="filter"/> <input type="checkbox" name="2" class="filter"/> ...etc... I'm trying to write a function where any time a checkbox is selected, it generates a string with all the names concatenated. Here's what I have so far: $('.filter').click(function(event){ var filters = $('.filter').toArray(); var fstr = ""; for (f in filters) { fstr = fstr+","+f.name; } alert(fstr); }); The names keep coming up as 'undefined', though (i.e. the alert returns ,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined,undefined). How do I access the names?

    Read the article

  • Jquery: Setting permanent height to an specific tab & resize plugin

    - by charlieCodex
    I am working with jquery sliding tabs. I have found a resize plugin that helps the tabs adjust to expanding content. The only thing is that i want to set a permanent height to tab 1(st_content_1). The code i have below works but it is a bit faulty. Should place in the function if statements? Check for the height of the first tab and then set it? Or a any better solution? You can check my EXAMPLE. Jquery $('.st_tab_view').resize(function() { var height = 250 $('div#st_content_1').css('height', height+'px'); var $this = $(this); $this.closest('.st_view').css('height', $this.height()); });

    Read the article

  • globally get any field value in user table of logged in user

    - by Jugga
    Im making a gaming community and i wanna be able to grab any info of the user on any page without so instead of having much of queries on all pages i made this function. Is it better to do this? Will this slow down the site? /** * ??????? ???????? ?? ????? ??????? authed ?????????????. */ function UserData($f) { global $_SESSION; return mysql_result(mysql_query("SELECT `$f` FROM `users` WHERE `id` = ".intval($_SESSION['id'])), 0, $f); }

    Read the article

  • Haskell: Problems with overloading: Interpreter can´t tell which + to use

    - by Ben
    Hi, I want to make functions Double - Double an instance of the Num typeclass. I want to define the sum of two functions as sum of their images. So I wrote instance Num Function where f + g = (\ x - (f x) + (g x)) Here the compiler complains he can´t tell whether I´m using Prelude.+ or Module.+ in the lambda expression. So I imported Prelude qualified as P and wrote instance Num Function where f + g = (\ x - (f x) P.+ (g x)) This compiles just fine, but when I try to add two functions in GHCi the interpreter complains again he can´t tell whether I´m using Prelude.+ or Module.+. Is there any way I can solve this problem?

    Read the article

  • What is user gcc's purpose in requesting code possibly like this?

    - by James Morris
    In the question between syntax, are there any equal function the user gcc is requesting only what I can imagine to be the following code: #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> /* estimated magic values */ #define MAXFUNCS 8 #define MAXFUNCLEN 3 int the_mainp_compare_func(char** mainp) { char mainp0[MAXFUNCS][MAXFUNCLEN] = { 0 }; char mainp1[MAXFUNCS][MAXFUNCLEN] = { 0 }; char* psrc, *pdst; int i = 0; int func = 0; psrc = mainp[0]; printf("scanning mainp[0] for functions...\n"); while(*psrc) { if (*psrc == '\0') break; else if (*psrc == ',') ++psrc; else { mainp0[func][0] = *psrc++; if (*psrc == ',') { mainp0[func][1] = '\0'; psrc++; } else if (*psrc !='\0') { mainp0[func][1] = *psrc++; mainp0[func][2] = '\0'; } printf("function: '%s'\n", mainp0[func]); } ++func; } printf("\nscanning mainp[1] for functions...\n"); psrc = mainp[1]; func = 0; while(*psrc) { if (*psrc == '\0') break; else if (*psrc == ',') ++psrc; else { mainp1[func][0] = *psrc++; if (*psrc == ',') { mainp1[func][1] = '\0'; psrc++; } else if (*psrc !='\0') { mainp1[func][1] = *psrc++; mainp1[func][2] = '\0'; } printf("function: '%s'\n", mainp1[func]); } ++func; } printf("\ncomparing functions in '%s' with those in '%s'\n", mainp[0], mainp[1] ); int func2; func = 0; while (*mainp0[func] != '\0') { func2 = 0; while(*mainp1[func2] != '\0') { printf("comparing %s with %s\n", mainp0[func], mainp1[func2]); if (strcmp(mainp0[func], mainp1[func2++]) == 0) return 1; /* not sure what to return here */ } ++func; } /* no matches == failure */ return -1; /* not sure what to return on failure */ } int main(int argc, char** argv) { char* mainp[] = { "P,-Q,Q,-R", "R,A,P,B,F" }; if (the_mainp_compare_func(mainp) == 1) printf("a match was found, but I don't know what to do with it!\n"); else printf("no match found, and I'm none the wiser!\n"); return 0; } My question is, what is it's purpose?

    Read the article

  • Tools for understanding large codebase

    - by 0tar0gz
    Hi! My whole life I have been programming in simple plain text editor. Lately, I was contemplating about joining an open source project which is fairly large and written in C. I downloaded the sources, started to look around, read this, forget that... Then I thought to myself: this can't be true. This is 21st century there must be some tool which would help me to understand the code, perhaps some kind of IDE or "code navigator". What flows from here to where, this typedef struct is just interface to that private type, this function is just #define from above, function called in this file is defined in that file, ... you get the idea. Dear Stack Overflow, is this 21st century? Is there something like this?

    Read the article

  • CSS Position Help (horizontal sidebar showing up when animate content over)

    - by jstacks
    Let me try my best to explain what I'd like to have happen, show you the code I have an hopefully I can get some help. So, I'm trying to do a sliding navigation UI from the left side of the screen (like a lot of mobile apps). The main content slides over, displaying the navigation menu beneath. Right now the browser thinks the screen is getting wider and introduces a horizontal scroll bar. However, I don't want that to happen... How do I get the div to animate off screen but not enlarge the width of the screen (i.e. keep it partially off screen)? Anyway here is my fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/2vP67/6/ And here is the code within the post: HTML <div id='wrapper'> <div id='navWide'> </div> <div id='containerWide'> </div> <div id='containerTall'> <div id='container'> <div id='nav'> <div id='navNavigate'> Open Menu </div> <div id='navNavigateHide'> Close Menu </div> </div> </div> </div> <div id='sideContainerTall'> <div id='sideContainer'> <div id='sideNav'>Side Navigation </div> </div> </div> </div> CSS #wrapper { width:100%; min-width:1000px; height:100%; min-height:100%; position:relative; top:0; left:0; z-index:0; } #navWide { color: #ffffff; background:#222222; width:100%; min-width:1000px; height:45px; position:fixed; top:0; left:0; z-index:100; } #containerWide { width:100%; min-width:1000px; min-height:100%; position:absolute; top:45px; z-index:100; } #containerTall { color: #000000; background:#dadada; width:960px; min-height:100%; margin-left:-480px; position:absolute; top:0; left:50%; z-index:1000; } /***** main container *****/ #container { width:960px; min-height:585px; } #nav { color: #ffffff; background:#222222; width:960px; height:45px; position:fixed; top:0; z-index:10000; } #navNavigate { background:yellow; font-size:10px; color:#888888; width:32px; height:32px; padding:7px 6px 6px 6px; float:left; cursor:pointer; } #navNavigateHide { background:yellow; font-size:10px; color:#888888; width:32px; height:32px; padding:7px 6px 6px 6px; float:left; cursor:pointer; display:none; } #sideContainerTall { background:#888888; width:264px; min-height:100%; margin-left:-480px; position:absolute; top:0; left:50%; z-index:500; } #sideContainer { width:264px; min-height:585px; display:none; } #sideContainerTall { background:#888888; width:264px; min-height:100%; margin-left:-480px; position:absolute; top:0; left:50%; z-index:500; } #sideContainer { width:264px; min-height:585px; display:none; } #sideNav { width:264px; height:648px; float:left; } Javascript $(document).ready(function() { $('div#navNavigate').click(function() { $('div#navNavigate').hide(); $('div#navNavigateHide').show(); $('div#sideContainer').show(); $('div#containerTall').animate({ 'left': '+=264px' }); }); $('div#navNavigateHide').click(function() { $('div#navNavigate').show(); $('div#navNavigateHide').hide(); $('div#containerTall').animate({ 'left': '-=264px' }, function() { $('div#sideContainer').hide(); }); }); });

    Read the article

  • Overriding vs Virtual

    - by anonymous
    What is the purpose of using the reserved word virtual in front of functions? If I want a child class to override a parent function, I just declare the same function such as "void draw(){}". class Parent{ public: void say(){ std::cout << "1"; }}; class Child : public Parent{public:void say(){ std::cout << "2"; } }; int main() { Child* a = new Child(); a->say(); return 0; } The output is 2. So again, why would the reserved word "virtual" be necessary in the header of say() ? Thanks a bunch.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680  | Next Page >