Search Results

Search found 27368 results on 1095 pages for 'msaccess to sql'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 675/1095 | < Previous Page | 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682  | Next Page >

  • Error 49 bad bind variable oracle forms

    - by mysticfalls
    I would like to ask regarding this error... Error 49 at line 5, column 6 bad bind variable 'S_ORD.payment_type' Here is the code: DECLARE N NUMBER; v_credit S_CUSTOMER.credit_rating%type; BEGIN IF :S_ORD.payment_type = 'CREDIT' THEN SELECT credit_rating INTO v_credit FROM S_CUSTOMER WHERE :S_ORD.customer_id = id; IF v_credit NOT IN ('GOOD', 'EXCELLENT') THEN :S_ORD.payment_type:= 'CASH'; n:=SHOW_ALERT('Payment_Type_Alert'); END IF; END IF; END; I'm new to oracle forms so I'm not sure if I have a missing setup or anything. S_ORD table exist and has a column payment_type, which consists of 'CREDIT' and 'CASH' value. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Can I Use EF Across Multiple DBs in One SQLServer Instance?

    - by thomashubschman
    Hello, I have been searching the blogs and articles but I have not found much support for this scenario. I have been poking around EF and realized that I could create views that contained data from multiple databases and then build the EF object model off of those views. Although it works I am not sure about the usual issues of performance, scalability, maintainability. The way I am achieving the connection between databases is by creating associations in the EF model. Does anyone have any information about this type of implementation? Either another solution or commentary on this proposed solution? Thanks, Tom

    Read the article

  • need to read data from oracle database with many conditions

    - by randeepsp
    hi! i have 3 tables A,B and C. table A has column employee_name,id table B is the main table and has columns id,os version. table c has the columns id,package id and package version. i want to query the count of employee_name where the id of table a and c are matched with id of table b(which is the main table). i should also get the names of employees grouped by the os version they have and also the package version.

    Read the article

  • Getting data from the next row in Oracle cursor

    - by Chaotic_one
    Hi, I'm building nested tree and I need to get data for the next row in cursor, using Oracle. And I still need current row, so looping forward is not a solution. Example: OPEN emp_cv FOR sql_stmt; LOOP FETCH emp_cv INTO v_rcod,v_rname,v_level; EXIT WHEN emp_cv%NOTFOUND; /*here lies the code for getting v_next_level*/ if v_next_level > v_level then /*code here*/ elsif v_next_level < v_level then /*code here*/ else /*code here*/ end if; END LOOP; CLOSE emp_cv;

    Read the article

  • MySQL -- How to do this better?

    - by Andrew
    $activeQuery = mysql_query("SELECT count(`status`) AS `active` FROM `assignments` WHERE `user` = $user_id AND `status` = 0"); $active = mysql_fetch_assoc($activeQuery); $failedQuery = mysql_query("SELECT count(`status`) AS `failed` FROM `assignments` WHERE `user` = $user_id AND `status` = 1"); $failed = mysql_fetch_assoc($failedQuery); $completedQuery = mysql_query("SELECT count(`status`) AS `completed` FROM `assignments` WHERE `user` = $user_id AND `status` = 2"); $completed = mysql_fetch_assoc($completedQuery); There has to be a better way to do that, right? I don't know how much I need to elaborate as you can see what I'm trying to do, but is there any way to do all of that in one query? I need to be able to output the active, failed, and completed assignments, preferably in one query.

    Read the article

  • One on One table relation - is it harmful to keep relation in both tables?

    - by EBAGHAKI
    I have 2 tables that their rows have one on one relation.. For you to understand the situation, suppose there is one table with user informations and there is another table that contains a very specific informations and each user can only link to one these specific kind of informations ( suppose second table as characters ) And that character can only assign to the user who grabs it, Is it against the rules of designing clean databases to hold the relation key in both tables? User Table: user_id, name, age, character_id Character Table: character_id, shape, user_id I have to do it for performance, how do you think about it?

    Read the article

  • How to first get different related values from diferent SQL tables (PHP)

    - by Ole Jak
    I am triig to fill options list. I have 2 tables USERS and STREAMS I vant to get all streams and get names of users assigned to that streams. Users consists of username and id Streams consists of id, userID, streamID I try such code: <?php global $connection; $query = "SELECT * FROM streams "; $streams_set = mysql_query($query, $connection); confirm_query($streams_set); $streams_count = mysql_num_rows($streams_set); while ($row = mysql_fetch_array($streams_set)){ $userid = $row['userID']; global $connection; $query2 = "SELECT email, username "; $query2 .= "FROM users "; $query2 .= "WHERE id = '{$userid}' "; $qs = mysql_query($query2, $connection); confirm_query($qs); $found_user = mysql_fetch_array($qs); echo ' <option value="'.$row['streamID'].'">'.$row['userID'].$found_user.'</option> '; } ?> But it does not return USER names from DB=( So what shall I do to this code to see usernames as "options" text?

    Read the article

  • difference between cn.execute and rs.update?

    - by every_answer_gets_a_point
    i am connecting to mysql from excel using odbc. the following illustrates how i am updating the rs With rs .AddNew ' create a new record ' add values to each field in the record .Fields("datapath") = dpath .Fields("analysistime") = atime .Fields("reporttime") = rtime .Fields("lastcalib") = lcalib .Fields("analystname") = aname .Fields("reportname") = rname .Fields("batchstate") = "bstate" .Fields("instrument") = "NA" .Update ' stores the new record End With the question is why is there a need to run cn.execute after this? havent i already updated the rs with rs.update?

    Read the article

  • Problem with sending "SetCookie" first in php code

    - by Camran
    According to this manual: http://us2.php.net/setcookie I have to set the cookie before anything else. Here is my cookie code: if (isset($_COOKIE['watched_ads'])){ $expir = time()+1728000; //20 days $ad_arr = unserialize($_COOKIE['watched_ads']); $arr_elem = count($ad_arr); if (in_array($ad_id, $ad_arr) == FALSE){ if ($arr_elem>10){ array_shift($ad_arr); } $ad_arr[]=$ad_id; setcookie('watched_ads', serialize($ad_arr), $expir, '/'); } } else { $expir = time()+1728000; //20 days $ad_arr[] = $ad_id; setcookie('watched_ads', serialize($ad_arr), $expir, '/'); } As you can see I am using variables in setting the cookie. The variables comes from a mysql_query and I have to do the query first. But then, if I do, I will get an error message: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by ... The error points to the line where I set the cookie above. What should I do?a

    Read the article

  • select distinct over specific columns

    - by Midhat
    A query in a system I maintain returns QID AID DATA 1 2 x 1 2 y 5 6 t As per a new requirement, I do not want the (QID, AID)=(1,2) pair to be repeated. We also dont care what value is selected from "data" column. either x or y will do. What I have done is to enclose the original query like this SELECT * FROM (<original query text>) Results group by QID,AID Is there a better way to go about this? The original query uses multiple joins and unions and what not, So I would prefer not to touch it unless its absolutely necesary

    Read the article

  • help with sql query - in access 2007

    - by Gold
    hi i have 2 tables table items has 144602 records table A has 27721 records code in items = BAR8 in A i want to show all records that equal i try this: SELECT Items.Code, A.BAR8 FROM Items INNER JOIN A ON Items.Code = A.BAR8; and i get 28048 records !!! i need to get 27721 , how to do it ? thank's in advance

    Read the article

  • How do I provide a string with a list of values to an "IN" statement

    - by Degan
    I am creating a string that is a list of comma-delimitted values by looping through the selections in a CheckBoxList. I am able to display this value, so I know that it is creating what I expect. I am attempting to pass this list to an IN statment in a SELECT query: SelectCommand="SELECT ThisDate, DATEPART(dw, ThisDate) AS Expr1 FROM fbCalendar WHERE (ThisDate &gt;= @ThisDate) AND (ThisDate &lt;= @ThisDate2) AND (DATEPART(dw, ThisDate) IN (@TheseDays))" <asp:ControlParameter ControlID="Label1" Name="TheseDays" PropertyName="Text" Type="String" /> This works fine as long as there is only a single item selected, but selecting a second item fails with the message: Conversion failed when converting the nvarchar value '4,5' to data type int. However, I do not understand when this would be converted to an INT. I have tried many different formatting attempts (such as encapsulating the string in parenthesis (e.g. "(4,5)" ) for the SELECT query, but I have yet to find the right one to make this work. It seems like formatting is the problem, but perhaps I am missing something else.

    Read the article

  • Query returning an ascending group number

    - by Dougman
    I have a query like below that has groups (COL1) and that group's values (COL2). select col1, col2 from (select 'A' col1, 1 col2 from dual union all select 'A' col1, 2 col2 from dual union all select 'B' col1, 1 col2 from dual union all select 'B' col1, 2 col2 from dual union all select 'C' col1, 1 col2 from dual union all select 'C' col1, 2 col2 from dual ) order by col1, col2; The output of this query looks like: COL1 COL2 ---- ---- A 1 A 2 B 1 B 2 C 1 C 2 What I need is a query that will return an ordered number increasing for each different group (COL1). It seems like there would be a simple way to accomplish this (maybe with analytics) but for some reason it is escaping me. GRPNUM COL1 COL2 ------ ---- ---- 1 A 1 1 A 2 2 B 1 2 B 2 3 C 1 3 C 2 I am running Oracle 10gR2.

    Read the article

  • mysql count(*) left join group by - the number of files in a folder

    - by Flavius
    Hi I have the following tables CREATE TABLE `files` ( `fileid` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `filename` varchar(255) NOT NULL, `filesize` int(11) NOT NULL, `folder` int(11) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`fileid`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; CREATE TABLE `folders` ( `directoryid` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `directoryname` varchar(255) NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`directoryid`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; How to get a list of all folders and the number of files they hold, including folders who have no (zero) files? Recursion must not be taken into account. Found it select folders.directoryid, folders.directoryname, count(files.fileid) as no_files from folders left join files on files.folder = folders.directoryid group by folders.directoryid, folders.directoryname I hope it will help someone.

    Read the article

  • How does linq decide between inner & outer joins

    - by user287795
    Hi Usually linq is using an left outer join for its queries but on some cases it decides to use inner join instead. I have a situation where that decision results in wrong results since the second table doesn't always have suitable records and that removes the records from the first table. I'm using a linqdatasource over a dbml where the relevant tables are identical but one holds historical records removed from the first. both have the same primary key. and I'm using a dataloadoption to load both tables at once with out round trips. Would you explain why linq decided to use an inner join here? Thanks

    Read the article

  • wanted to get all dates in mysql result

    - by PankajK
    I have mysql table called user(id, name, join_on) join on is a date field what I want is to show in each day how many uses has been created I can use group by but it will only give me the dates when users get added like if date 4/12/10 5 users added 4/13/10 2 users added 4/15/10 7 users added here date 4/14/10 is missing and I want listing of all dates in one month. I have one solution for it by creating another table only for adding date and that table will left join my users table on join_on and will give total result but I don't want to do that as for creating that I need to create and add entries in date table please suggest the different approach for doing so. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Problem with Nulls and an UPDATE statement

    - by Dave
    UPDATE TableA SET Value = a.Value * b.AnotherValue FROM TableA AS a INNER JOIN TableB AS b WHERE (Condition is true); Here is the problem. The Value field for TableA does not allow nulls. If the calculation of a.Value * b.AnotherValue yields a null, an error is thrown. Now the question. Is there any way to tell the UPDATE to ignore the SET phase when the result of the calculation is a null and delete the record rather than updating it. This UPDATE is intended to update hundreds of records at a time but will fail if a single null is encountered. Also, please note that using the ISNULL() function and setting the Value to zero is not acceptable. I would like the record to be dropped if a null is encountered. Many thanks in advance for any help rendered.

    Read the article

  • Selecting distinct values from mysql with largest timestamp

    - by user987048
    I am building a mail system. The inbox is only supposed to grab the last message (one with the highest time value) of a concatenation of user and sender, where the user or sender is the user ID. Here is the table structure: CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `mail` ( `user` int(11) NOT NULL, `sender` int(11) NOT NULL, `body` text NOT NULL, `new` enum('0','1') NOT NULL default '1', `time` int(11) NOT NULL, KEY `user` (`user`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; So, with a table with the following data: user sender new time ***************************************** 1 0 0 5 1 0 0 6 2 1 0 7 1 0 1 8 1 2 0 9 1 0 1 11 1 2 1 12 I want to select the following: WHERE USER OR SENDER = X (in this case, 1) user sender new time ***************************************** 2 1 0 7 1 2 0 9 1 0 1 11 How would I go about doing something like this?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682  | Next Page >