Search Results

Search found 27368 results on 1095 pages for 'msaccess to sql'.

Page 677/1095 | < Previous Page | 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684  | Next Page >

  • Errors with parameter datatype in PostgreSql query

    - by John
    Im trying to execute a query to postgresql using the following code. It's written in C/C++ and I keep getting the following error when declaring a cursor: DECLARE CURSOR failed: ERROR: could not determine data type of parameter $1 Searching on here and on google, I can't find a solution. Can anyone find where I have made and error and why this is happening? thanks! void searchdb( PGconn *conn, char* name, char* offset ) { // Will hold the number of field in table int nFields; // Start a transaction block PGresult *res = PQexec(conn, "BEGIN"); if (PQresultStatus(res) != PGRES_COMMAND_OK) { printf("BEGIN command failed: %s", PQerrorMessage(conn)); PQclear(res); exit_nicely(conn); } // Clear result PQclear(res); printf("BEGIN command - OK\n"); //set the values to use const char *values[3] = {(char*)name, (char*)RESULTS_LIMIT, (char*)offset}; //calculate the lengths of each of the values int lengths[3] = {strlen((char*)name), sizeof(RESULTS_LIMIT), sizeof(offset)}; //state which parameters are binary int binary[3] = {0, 0, 1}; res = PQexecParams(conn, "DECLARE emprec CURSOR for SELECT name, id, 'Events' as source FROM events_basic WHERE name LIKE '$1::varchar%' UNION ALL " " SELECT name, fsq_id, 'Venues' as source FROM venues_cache WHERE name LIKE '$1::varchar%' UNION ALL " " SELECT name, geo_id, 'Cities' as source FROM static_cities WHERE name LIKE '$1::varchar%' OR FIND_IN_SET('$1::varchar%', alternate_names) != 0 LIMIT $2::int4 OFFSET $3::int4", 3, //number of parameters NULL, //ignore the Oid field values, //values to substitute $1 and $2 lengths, //the lengths, in bytes, of each of the parameter values binary, //whether the values are binary or not 0); //we want the result in text format // Fetch rows from table if (PQresultStatus(res) != PGRES_COMMAND_OK) { printf("DECLARE CURSOR failed: %s", PQerrorMessage(conn)); PQclear(res); exit_nicely(conn); } // Clear result PQclear(res); res = PQexec(conn, "FETCH ALL in emprec"); if (PQresultStatus(res) != PGRES_TUPLES_OK) { printf("FETCH ALL failed"); PQclear(res); exit_nicely(conn); } // Get the field name nFields = PQnfields(res); // Prepare the header with table field name printf("\nFetch record:"); printf("\n********************************************************************\n"); for (int i = 0; i < nFields; i++) printf("%-30s", PQfname(res, i)); printf("\n********************************************************************\n"); // Next, print out the record for each row for (int i = 0; i < PQntuples(res); i++) { for (int j = 0; j < nFields; j++) printf("%-30s", PQgetvalue(res, i, j)); printf("\n"); } PQclear(res); // Close the emprec res = PQexec(conn, "CLOSE emprec"); PQclear(res); // End the transaction res = PQexec(conn, "END"); // Clear result PQclear(res); }

    Read the article

  • Most efficient way to Update with Linq2Sql

    - by pranay
    can I update my employee record as given in below function or i have to make query of employee collection first and than i update data public int updateEmployee(App3_EMPLOYEE employee) { DBContextDataContext db = new DBContextDataContext(); db.App3_EMPLOYEEs.Attach(employee); db.SubmitChanges(); return employee.PKEY; } or i have to do this public int updateEmployee(App3_EMPLOYEE employee) { DBContextDataContext db = new DBContextDataContext(); App3_EMPLOYEE emp = db.App3_EMPLOYEEs.Single(e => e.PKEY == employee.PKEY); db.App3_EMPLOYEEs.Attach(employee,emp); db.SubmitChanges(); return employee.PKEY; } But i dont want to use second option is there any efficient way to update data

    Read the article

  • Query to bring count from comma seperated Value

    - by Mugil
    I have Two Tables One for Storing Products and Other for Storing Orders List. CREATE TABLE ProductsList(ProductId INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, ProductName VARCHAR(50)) INSERT INTO ProductsList(ProductId, ProductName) VALUES(1,'Product A'), (2,'Product B'), (3,'Product C'), (4,'Product D'), (5,'Product E'), (6,'Product F'), (7,'Product G'), (8,'Product H'), (9,'Product I'), (10,'Product J'); CREATE TABLE OrderList(OrderId INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT, EmailId VARCHAR(50), CSVProductIds VARCHAR(50)) SELECT * FROM OrderList INSERT INTO OrderList(EmailId, CSVProductIds) VALUES('[email protected]', '2,4,1,5,7'), ('[email protected]', '5,7,4'), ('[email protected]', '2'), ('[email protected]', '8,9'), ('[email protected]', '4,5,9'), ('[email protected]', '1,2,3'), ('[email protected]', '9,10'), ('[email protected]', '1,5'); Output ItemName NoOfOrders Product A 4 Product B 3 Product C 1 Product D 3 Product E 4 Product F 0 Product G 2 Product H 1 Product I 2 Product J 1 The Order List Stores the ItemsId as Comma separated value for every customer who places order.Like this i am having more than 40k Records in my dB table Now I am assigned with a task of creating report in which I should display Items and No of People ordered Items as Shown Below I Used Query as below in my PHP to bring the Orders One By One and storing in array. SELECT COUNT(PL.EmailId) FROM OrderList PL WHERE CSVProductIds LIKE '2' OR CSVProductIds LIKE '%,2,%' OR CSVProductIds LIKE '%,2' OR CSVProductIds LIKE '2,%'; 1.Is it possible to get the same out put by using Single Query 2.Does using a like in mysql query slows down the dB when the table has more no of records i.e 40k rows

    Read the article

  • entering data in sql database through asp

    - by sushant
    pass=session("password") Set objIns=server.CreateObject("adodb.connection") objIns.Open session("Psrconnect") inspass="Insert into passwords(pass) values ('&pass&')" objIns.Execute(inspass) i dont know what should be the syntax to pass the value stored in the variable. with this syntax, the value entered in the database is &pass&. can anyone plz help me out?

    Read the article

  • Difference between "and" and "where" in joins

    - by Midhat
    Whats the difference between SELECT DISTINCT field1 FROM table1 cd JOIN table2 ON cd.Company = table2.Name and table2.Id IN (2728) and SELECT DISTINCT field1 FROM table1 cd JOIN table2 ON cd.Company = table2.Name where table2.Id IN (2728) both return the same result and both have the same explain output

    Read the article

  • Problem with Nulls and an UPDATE statement

    - by Dave
    UPDATE TableA SET Value = a.Value * b.AnotherValue FROM TableA AS a INNER JOIN TableB AS b WHERE (Condition is true); Here is the problem. The Value field for TableA does not allow nulls. If the calculation of a.Value * b.AnotherValue yields a null, an error is thrown. Now the question. Is there any way to tell the UPDATE to ignore the SET phase when the result of the calculation is a null and delete the record rather than updating it. This UPDATE is intended to update hundreds of records at a time but will fail if a single null is encountered. Also, please note that using the ISNULL() function and setting the Value to zero is not acceptable. I would like the record to be dropped if a null is encountered. Many thanks in advance for any help rendered.

    Read the article

  • MSYQL ~ Why does this query only select a single row?

    - by Joe
    SELECT * FROM tbl_houses WHERE (SELECT HousesList FROM tbl_lists WHERE tbl_lists.ID = '123') LIKE CONCAT('% ', tbl_houses.ID, '#') ^ It only selects the row from tbl_houses of the last occuring "tbl_houses.ID" inside tbl_lists.HousesList I need it to select ALL the rows where any ID from tbl_houses exists within tbl_lists.HousesList

    Read the article

  • How to differentiate two tables

    - by Nemat
    I have two tables and I want to get all records from one table that are different from the records in second table. Eg.: if we have four records in the first table like A,B,C,D and three records in the second table thats A,B,C then the answer of query should be D. I have tried "EXCEPT" operator but it doesn't work fine. Kindly help me in writing correct query for the given problem.

    Read the article

  • MySql paging; "Showing result-set" of "total found" help

    - by Camran
    I need a formula for showing results on my classifieds website. I am now done with the paging of records, but this formula for showing results remains. I want it like this: Showing 1-50 of 123 found. Now what is the formula for this? I have these variables which should be enough I think: $results_per_page = 50; //results per page $page = 1; //current page Also a variable called $num_total contains the total nr of hits, in this case 123. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Problems with mysql syntax

    - by user368453
    Hello everyone !! I´m trying to create a trigger on MySQL but I´m having a sintaxe problem, which I was not able to find. If someone more experient could help me it would be great (it´s the first time I use MySQL!)... The reason why I´m creating this trigger is for deleting all the orphan "labels", which has a many-to-many relation with "service_descriptor" (this two entities are linked by service_labels). The code I have is: CREATE TRIGGER trg_delete_orphan_label AFTER DELETE FOR EACH ROW ON restdb.service_labels DELETE FROM restdb.labels WHERE EXISTS (SELECT * FROM old D LEFT_JOIN restdb.service_labels SL ON SL.id_label = D.id_label AND D.id_service = SL.id_service WHERE SL.id_label IS NULL restdb.labels.id = D.SL.id_label ); Thanks in advance !

    Read the article

  • Best way to get distinct values from large table

    - by derivation
    I have a db table with about 10 or so columns, two of which are month and year. The table has about 250k rows now, and we expect it to grow by about 100-150k records a month. A lot of queries involve the month and year column (ex, all records from march 2010), and so we frequently need to get the available month and year combinations (ie do we have records for april 2010?). A coworker thinks that we should have a separate table from our main one that only contains the months and years we have data for. We only add records to our main table once a month, so it would just be a small update on the end of our scripts to add the new entry to this second table. This second table would be queried whenever we need to find the available month/year entries on the first table. This solution feels kludgy to me and a violation of DRY. What do you think is the correct way of solving this problem? Is there a better way than having two tables?

    Read the article

  • wp+sql+image not goin in the folder

    - by happy
    this is my code for uploading image in database but image are going to the desird forlder...but when i m tryin to retrieve the images to diaplay,,they are not displayed..anyone help me...... $category=$_POST['category']; $uploadDir = 'D:/xampp/htdocs/js/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/img/imagess/ '; $fileName = $_FILES['Photo']['name']; $tmpName = $_FILES['Photo']['tmp_name']; $fileSize = $_FILES['Photo']['size']; $fileType = $_FILES['Photo']['type']; $filePath = $uploadDir . $fileName; $result = move_uploaded_file($tmpName,$filePath); if (!$result) { echo "Error uploading file"; exit; } if(!get_magic_quotes_gpc()) { $fileName = addslashes($fileName); $filePath = addslashes($filePath); } global $wpdb; //$insert=$wpdb->insert('images',array('image_name'=>$filePath,'cat_name'=>$category),array('%b','%s')); $insert=$wpdb->insert('images',array('image_name'=>$filePath,'cat_name'=>$category)); $wpdb->insert('categories',array('cat_name'=>$category)); echo "Successfully Submitted";

    Read the article

  • Database is very slow when creating an index

    - by kaliyaperumal M
    My database has around 25 core numbers, in that weekly basis I need to create an index and drop index. While creating the index it takes long time to complete, my log file also keeps on increasing, and when I delete some numbers from that table also taking too much time (because weekly basis I have to delete 30 to 50 lack numbers and add 30 to 40 lack new number also). Can u please give me the proper solution..

    Read the article

  • Export SQL Binary/BLOB Data?

    - by davemackey
    Recently a software application we utilize upgraded from ASP to ASP.NET. In the process they abandoned the old web-based product and rewrote the entire UI, using new DB tables. The old DB tables still exist in the database and contain legacy files in binary or blob formats. I'm wondering if there is an easy way to export all these legacy files from the database to the filesystem (NTFS)? Then we could delete these old unused tables and save a few GB of space in the DB backups, etc.

    Read the article

  • Optimizing MySQL queries with IN operator

    - by Arkadiusz Kondas
    I have a MySQL database with a fairly large table where the products are. Each of them has its own id and categoryId field where there is a category id belongs to this product. Now I have a query that pulls out products from given categories such as: SELECT * FROM products WHERE categoryId IN ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 34, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ) Of course, come a WHERE clause and ORDER BY sort but not in this thing. Let's say that these products is 250k and the visits are over 100k per day. Under such conditions in the table slow_log registered weight of these queries with large generation time. Do you have any ideas how to optimize the given problem? Table engine is MyISAM.

    Read the article

  • Find Consecutive Rows & Calculate Duration

    - by MannyKo
    I have a set a of data that tells me if a couple of systems are available or not every 5 or 15 minutes increments. For now, the time increment shouldn't matter. The data looks like this: Status Time System_ID T 10:00 S01 T 10:15 S01 F 10:30 S01 F 10:45 S01 F 11:00 S01 T 11:15 S01 T 11:30 S01 F 11:45 S01 F 12:00 S01 F 12:15 S01 T 12:30 S01 F 10:00 S02 F 10:15 S02 F 10:30 S02 F 10:45 S02 F 11:00 S02 T 11:15 S02 T 11:30 S02 I want to create a view that tells when a system is NOT available (i.e. when it is F), from what time, to what time, and duration which is to - from. Desired results: System_ID From To Duration S01 10:30 11:00 00:30 S01 11:45 12:15 00:30 S02 10:00 11:00 01:00 Here is the script data: DROP SCHEMA IF EXISTS Sys_data CASCADE; CREATE SCHEMA Sys_data; CREATE TABLE test_data ( status BOOLEAN, dTime TIME, sys_ID VARCHAR(10), PRIMARY KEY (dTime, sys_ID) ); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '10:00:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '10:15:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:30:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:45:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '11:00:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '11:15:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '11:30:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '11:45:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '12:00:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '12:15:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '12:30:00', 'S01'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:00:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:15:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:30:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '10:45:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (FALSE, '11:00:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '11:15:00', 'S02'); INSERT INTO test_data (status, dTime, sys_ID) VALUES (TRUE, '11:30:00', 'S02'); Thank you in advance!

    Read the article

  • replicating master tables mapping in transaction tables

    - by NoDisplay
    I have three master tables for location information Country {ID, Name} State {ID, Name, CountryID} City {ID, Name, StateID} Now I have one transcation table called Person which hold the person name and his location information. My Question is shall I have only CityID in the Person table like this: Person {ID, Name, CityID}' And have view of join query which give me detail like "Person{ID,Name,City,State,Country}" or Shall I replicate the mapping Person {ID, Name, CityID, StateID, CountryID} Please suggest which do you feel is to be selected and why? if there is any other option available, please suggest. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Oracle Sql: how to substract rows from one table from another only once

    - by slyder07
    I'm working for a university project, and I have the following question: I have 2 tables in a Oracle DB... I need to select those rows from table1, which are not included in table2... But the main problem is that I need to exclude that rows from table2 wich was selected once... For example: Table1 Table2 ResultTable id | Number | Letter id | Number | Letter id | Number | Letter _____________________ _____________________ _____________________ 1 4 S 1 6 G 2 2 P 2 2 P 2 8 B 3 5 B 3 5 B 3 4 S 4 4 S 4 4 S 4 1 A 6 2 P 5 1 A 5 1 H 6 2 P 6 2 X So, how you see it, if one row from Table1 has a "twin" in Table2, they both are excluded. Hope I was explicit enough. Sorry for my bad English. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Merging some columns of two mysql tables where id = fileid

    - by garg
    There are two tables TableA filedata_id | user_id | filename 1 | 1 | file.txt 2 | 1 | file2.txt TableB a_id | date | filedataid | counter | state | cat_id | subcat_id | med_id 99 | 1242144 | 1 | 2 | v | 55 | 56 | 90 100 | 1231232 | 2 | 3 | i | 44 | 55 | 110 I want to move columns cat_id, subcat_id, med_id to TableA where tableA.filedata_id = TableB.filedataid The result should be: TableA filedata_id | user_id | filename | cat_id | subcat_id | med_id 1 | 1 | file.txt | 55 | 56 | 90 2 | 1 | file2.txt | 44 | 55 | 110 and so on. Is there a way to do this easily?

    Read the article

  • Replace BIT values with some text

    - by nihi_l_ist
    I have a BIT column with gender (0,1) and want to replace 0 and 1 in the resulting view with the words "man" and "woman". Can i do this right in the view with some system finction or i have to write my own function to do that?

    Read the article

  • simple query Delete records in a table based on count logic

    - by user1905941
    a table with a pk and status column which is having values as 'Y','N','NULL' Query: get the count of records with status column as 'Y', if this count exceeds 1% of total count of records then dont delete , else delete the records in the table. i tried like this Declare v_count Number; v_count1 Number; BEGIN v_count := select count(*) from temp; v_count1 := select count(*) from temp where status = 'Y' ; v_count := v_count + ((0.1) * (v_count)) if (v_count1 > v_count) { insert into temp1 values(pk,status) } else { Delete from temp ; } END;

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684  | Next Page >