Search Results

Search found 3413 results on 137 pages for 'addresses'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 7/137 | < Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >

  • Obtaining IP addresses in Bittorrent

    - by Legend
    I am trying to get a list of IP addresses serving or downloading a file. What I did was to contact a tracker like openbittorrent.com to get the following (as part of the scrape file): B%00%00%0C%5F%B1%B1l%CAGa%84S%CB%B0%9BG%84%3BE:0:1 Now, the long string in the beginning is the info hash. As a next step, I did this: http://tracker.sometracker.com/announce?info_hash=B%00%00%0C%5F%B1%B1l%CAGa%84S%CB%B0%9BG%84%3BE It gave me back the following. So far so good. The message contained this: d8:completei0e10:downloadedi0e10:incompletei2e8:intervali1931e12:min intervali965e5:peers12:U????????^@^@e Can someone tell me what should I be doing after this to get the IP addresses currently serving the file or downloading it?

    Read the article

  • How to geocode a large number of addresses?

    - by user308569
    I need to geocode, i.e. translate street address to latitude,longitude for ~8,000 street addresses. I am using both Yahoo and Google geocoding engines at http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/geocoder/, and found out that for a large number of addresses those engines (one of them or both) either could not perform geocoding (i.e.return latitude=0,longitude=0), or return the wrong coordinates (incl. cases when Yahoo and Google give different results). What is the best way to handle this problem? Which engine is (usually) more accurate? I would appreciate any thoughts, suggestions, ideas from people who had previous experience with this kind of task.

    Read the article

  • How to geocoding big number of addresses?

    - by user308569
    I need to geocode, i.e. translate street address to latitude,longitude for ~8,000 street addresses. I am using both Yahoo and Google geocoding engines at http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/geocoder/, and found out that for a big number of addresses those engines (one of them or both) either could not perform geocoding (i.e.return latitude=0,longitude=0), or return wrong coordinates (incl. cases when Yahoo and Google give different results). What is the best way to handle this problem? Which engine is (usually) more accurate? I would appreciate any thoughts, suggestions, ideas from people who had previous experience with this kind of task.

    Read the article

  • How do I create email addresses for DotNetNuke users using my domain ([email protected]

    - by rwain
    My client wants to create email addresses for all their dotnetnuke users using their domain. The point is to keep the user's email addresses 'private' while still allowing communication through a public email address that they can control. It's not necessary to have a full webmail interface (although that would be nice). I'm thinking it would be enough just to forward any mail on and just act as a gateway. So if an email was sent to [email protected], it would be forwarded on to the email address associated with the dotnetnuke account with username 'rwain'. Is this possible to do in a shared hosting environment? Or do I need to create some custom mail server that does a conversion of the email address and forwards it?

    Read the article

  • Valid Email Addresses - XSS and SQL Injection

    - by PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM
    Since there are so many valid characters for email addresses, are there any valid email addresses that can in themselves be XSS attacks or SQL injections? I couldn't find any information on this on the web. The local-part of the e-mail address may use any of these ASCII characters: Uppercase and lowercase English letters (a–z, A–Z) Digits 0 to 9 Characters ! # $ % & ' * + - / = ? ^ _ ` { | } ~ Character . (dot, period, full stop) provided that it is not the last character, and provided also that it does not appear two or more times consecutively (e.g. [email protected]). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_address#RFC_specification I'm not asking how to prevent these attacks (I'm already using parametrized queries and HTML purifier), this is more a proof-of-concept. The first thing that came to mind was 'OR [email protected], except that spaces are not allowed. Do all SQL injections require spaces?

    Read the article

  • How to handle customers with multiple addresses in CakePHP

    - by Ryan
    I'm putting together a system to track customer orders. Each order will have three addresses; a Main contact address, a billing address and a shipping address. I do not want to have columns in my orders table for the three addresses, I'd like to reference them from a separate table and have some way to enumerate the entry so I can determine if the addressing is main, shipping or billing. Does it make sense to create a column in the address table for AddressType and enumerate that or create another table - AddressTypes - that defines the address enumeration and link to that table? I have found other questions that touch on this topic and that is where I've taken my model. The problem I'm having is taking that into the cakePHP convention. I've been struggling to internalize the direction OneToMany relationships are formed - the way the documentation states feels backwards to me. Any help would be appreciated, Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Get local network interface addresses using only proc?

    - by Matt Joiner
    How can I obtain the (IPv4) addresses for all network interfaces using only proc? After some extensive investigation I've discovered the following: ifconfig makes use of SIOCGIFADDR, which requires open sockets and advance knowledge of all the interface names. It also isn't documented in any manual pages on Linux. proc contains /proc/net/dev, but this is a list of interface statistics. proc contains /proc/net/if_inet6, which is exactly what I need but for IPv6. Generally interfaces are easy to find in proc, but actual addresses are very rarely used except where explicitly part of some connection. There's a system call called getifaddrs, which is very much a "magical" function you'd expect to see in Windows. It's also implemented on BSD. However it's not very text-oriented, which makes it difficult to use from non-C languages.

    Read the article

  • Match e-mail addresses not contained in HTML tag

    - by SvartalF
    I need to highlight an email addresses in text but not highlight them if contained in HTML tags, content, or attributes. For example, the string [email protected] must be converted to <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> But email addresses in the string <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> must not be processed. I've tried something like this regexp: (?<![":])[a-zA-Z0-9._%-+]+@[a-zA-Z0-9._%-]+.[a-zA-Z]{2,6}(?!") but it doesn't work properly.

    Read the article

  • Pulling international street addresses / phone numbers from free-form text

    - by spitzanator
    Hey, folks. I'm looking for some regular expressions to help grab street addresses and phone numbers from free-form text (a la Gmail). Given some text: "John, I went to the store today, and it was awesome! Did you hear that they moved to 500 Green St.? ... Give me a call at +14252425424 when you get a chance." I'd like to be able to pull out: 500 Green St. (recognized as a street address) +14252425424 (recognized as a phone number) What makes this problem easier is that I don't care about parsing text that gets pulled out. That is, I don't care that Green is the name of the road or that 425 is the area code. I just want to grab strings that "look like" addresses or telephone numbers. Unfortunately, this needs to work internationally, as best as possible. Anyone have any leads? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • API for configuring static IP addresses in an android application

    - by awoodland
    Is it possible to set the IP address of an interface in Android within an application? I can query the available interfaces and their current addresses using java.net.NetworkInterface, but this doesn't provide a facility to change these. Did I just miss something somewhere or is it not allowed? I was hoping to be able to make my application either change or add an alias to one or more of the existing interfaces at runtime on an "off the shelf" device. (2.1/2.2). Ideally I'd like to do this for both IPv4 and v6 addresses.

    Read the article

  • Reserved Memory Addresses?

    - by Nate
    Is there a list of reserved memory addresses out there - a list of addresses that the memory of a user-space program could never be allocated to? I realize this is most likely per-OS or per-architecture, but I was hoping someone might know some of the more common OSes and Arches. I could only dig one up for a few versions of windows: for windows NT,2k and XP that would be: 0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff - lowest page is protected to simplify debugging 0x00001000 - 0x7ffeffff - memory area for your application 0x7fff0000 - 0x7fffffff - protected area to keep memory-functions from damaging the following part 0x80000000 - 0xffffffff - memory where the system including drivers and so on is located Anyone know about for Linux, or BSD (or anything else, for that matter)?

    Read the article

  • How to set up spf records to send mail from google hosted apps to gmail addresses

    - by Chris Adams
    Hi there, I'm trying to work out why email I send from one domain I own is rejected by another that I own, and while I think it may be related to how I've setup spf records, I'm not sure what steps I need to take to fix it. Here's the error message I receive: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550-Verification failed for <[email protected]> 550-No Such User Here 550 Sender verify failed (state 14). Here's the response from [email protected] Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by 10.86.92.9 with SMTP id p9cs85371fgb; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.205.4 with SMTP id c4mr2406190agg.29.1251956007562; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:33:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from verifier.port25.com (207-36-201-235.ptr.primarydns.com [207.36.201.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 26si831174aga.24.2009.09.02.22.33.25; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 207.36.201.235 as permitted sender) client-ip=207.36.201.235; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 207.36.201.235 as permitted sender) [email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=auth; d=port25.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To; [email protected]; bh=GRMrcnoucTl4upzqJYTG5sOZMLU=; b=uk6TjADEyZVRkceQGjH94ZzfVeRTsiZPzbXuhlqDt1m+kh1zmdUEoiTOzd89ryCHMbVcnG1JajBj 5vOMKYtA3g== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=auth; d=port25.com; b=NqKCPK00Xt49lbeO009xy4ZRgMGpghvcgfhjNy7+qI89XKTzi6IUW0hYqCQyHkd2p5a1Zjez2ZMC l0u9CpZD3Q==; Received: from verifier.port25.com (127.0.0.1) by verifier.port25.com (PowerMTA(TM) v3.6a1) id hjt9pq0hse8u for <[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 01:26:52 -0400 (envelope-from <[email protected]>) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 01:26:52 -0400 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Authentication Report Message-Id: <[email protected]> Precedence: junk (auto_reply) In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> This message is an automatic response from Port25's authentication verifier service at verifier.port25.com. The service allows email senders to perform a simple check of various sender authentication mechanisms. It is provided free of charge, in the hope that it is useful to the email community. While it is not officially supported, we welcome any feedback you may have at <[email protected]>. Thank you for using the verifier, The Port25 Solutions, Inc. team ========================================================== Summary of Results ========================================================== SPF check: pass DomainKeys check: neutral DKIM check: neutral Sender-ID check: pass SpamAssassin check: ham ========================================================== Details: ========================================================== HELO hostname: fg-out-1718.google.com Source IP: 72.14.220.158 mail-from: [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------- SPF check details: ---------------------------------------------------------- Result: pass ID(s) verified: [email protected] DNS record(s): stemcel.co.uk. 14400 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:aspmx.googlemail.com ~all" aspmx.googlemail.com. 7200 IN TXT "v=spf1 redirect=_spf.google.com" _spf.google.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:216.239.32.0/19 ip4:64.233.160.0/19 ip4:66.249.80.0/20 ip4:72.14.192.0/18 ip4:209.85.128.0/17 ip4:66.102.0.0/20 ip4:74.125.0.0/16 ip4:64.18.0.0/20 ip4:207.126.144.0/20 ?all" ---------------------------------------------------------- DomainKeys check details: ---------------------------------------------------------- Result: neutral (message not signed) ID(s) verified: [email protected] DNS record(s): ---------------------------------------------------------- DKIM check details: ---------------------------------------------------------- Result: neutral (message not signed) ID(s) verified: NOTE: DKIM checking has been performed based on the latest DKIM specs (RFC 4871 or draft-ietf-dkim-base-10) and verification may fail for older versions. If you are using Port25's PowerMTA, you need to use version 3.2r11 or later to get a compatible version of DKIM. ---------------------------------------------------------- Sender-ID check details: ---------------------------------------------------------- Result: pass ID(s) verified: [email protected] DNS record(s): stemcel.co.uk. 14400 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:aspmx.googlemail.com ~all" aspmx.googlemail.com. 7200 IN TXT "v=spf1 redirect=_spf.google.com" _spf.google.com. 300 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:216.239.32.0/19 ip4:64.233.160.0/19 ip4:66.249.80.0/20 ip4:72.14.192.0/18 ip4:209.85.128.0/17 ip4:66.102.0.0/20 ip4:74.125.0.0/16 ip4:64.18.0.0/20 ip4:207.126.144.0/20 ?all" ---------------------------------------------------------- SpamAssassin check details: ---------------------------------------------------------- SpamAssassin v3.2.5 (2008-06-10) Result: ham (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message I've registered the spf records for my domain, as advised here Both domains pass validate according to Kitterman's spf record testing tools, so I'm somewhat confused about this. I also have the catchall address set up on the stemcel.co.uk domain here, but I don't have one setup for chrisadams.me.uk. Instead, we have the following forwarders setup [email protected] to [email protected] [email protected] to [email protected] [email protected] to [email protected] [email protected] to [email protected] Any ideas how to get this working? I'm not sure what I should be looking for here.

    Read the article

  • Can I auto-forward Gmail to multiple addresses?

    - by Yuval
    Hi, I have set up a Gmail account with the intention of having it function as a mail hub, meaning it should forward every mail item to all of its contact list, in this case my friends and me. I created a simple filter for all incoming items (from:*), but the 'Forward it to' field will only allow me a single email address, and not even a contact group. Is there a way around this? And why is such a simple feature not available in Gmail? I thought they were out of beta...

    Read the article

  • I can't send email from my server to gmail addresses

    - by brianegge
    I'm using postfix, and have setup spf, dkim, and domainkeys. I can get my email to go to Yahoo, but not gmail. Here's the headers from an email send to Yahoo. Yahoo reports the email as domain key verified. X-Apparently-To: brianegge at yahoo.com via 68.142.206.167; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:29:19 -0700 Return-Path: <domains at theeggeadventure.com> X-YahooFilteredBulk: 67.207.137.114 X-YMailISG: x7_Rl9EWLDuugoqPcORhih0FeQMOaIIpz4qfuu9ttx1xbo3uKI2kz.CLUy2cJ1BTtHAwuJtrsGRsveHIx.Dx95avNGlPPGWy_cSpnEwWLXGxBciO.YgtSQxdURQiWLCLvbHej0QPjQIHFjAFjdeGhJd2Y8NgTW1wcExq45Sb7LMlOGvtGMjSQuc8QazwXUxpZrQbIxgSQUTmzQO1x30xaZ2Us6TQTab7Wpya6OgAX.emKOM3phfS5kfhYj9FLQ.qi32sFNWnAoFdVK596OTP2F63PAJOVM5qPsM2jIAbJylIBmnj94LO7hOVr3KOS6XLtCPRn2Oe X-Originating-IP: [67.207.137.114] Authentication-Results: mta1055.mail.mud.yahoo.com from=theeggeadventure.com; domainkeys=pass (ok); from=theeggeadventure.com; dkim=pass (ok) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO mail.theeggeadventure.com) (67.207.137.114) by mta1055.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:29:19 -0700 Received: by mail.theeggeadventure.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id BB5B01C16A4; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:29:16 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=2010; d=theeggeadventure.com; c=simple; q=dns; b=JHbK9VhqyQTfpQFqaXxJrKpEG9h9H0IZ0LdWoBooJEA7hv3SYWmFUtyE247EuwoaG gzApKJ1DuRhwESZ7PswrbzuaUL8poAUO8LmMvZ+OqnDolgNSJUYWu0FcO+fe3H4m9ZD grkj0xMpHw+uFjXV4plKO+sa8olJXJAmP+9cMEo= X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail.theeggeadventure.com BB5B01C16A4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=theeggeadventure.com; s=2010; t=1269088156; bh=bUlMldcnzFCmCmNT8qjpRl6fiY1YyjiZiC9jhCXASOw=; h=Subject:To:Message-Id:Date:From; b=EVNolTlh4Gch5/HIrrHaRQvcApl7wkB42gB44NsPcLZD2QrhuOvnhanhnEB4UbV0e A+3dAOjhX7LKzgGrn11jXNTiEjNX1vQDsX3HyG0fNra73aWiGTzr1nHJfnuEJ7Ph0j 5tp0HRL5jjikD1XJcvmsYzTpT22mxuz60HXYRB1s= Subject: cron To: <brianegge at yahoo.com> X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 1.2) Message-Id: <[email protected]> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:29:16 +0000 (UTC) From: This sender is DomainKeys verified [email protected] (domains) View contact details Content-Length: 818 When I send to gmail, I see the following in my server log, but the message doesn't even reach my spam folder. Mar 20 12:59:12 Everest postfix/pickup[27802]: C81C61C16A4: uid=1000 from=<egge> Mar 20 12:59:12 Everest postfix/cleanup[27847]: C81C61C16A4: message-id=<[email protected]> Mar 20 12:59:13 Everest postfix/qmgr[27801]: C81C61C16A4: from=<[email protected]>, size=2784, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Mar 20 12:59:14 Everest postfix/smtp[27849]: C81C61C16A4: to=<brianegge at gmail.com>, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[209.85.223.24]:25, delay=2.1, delays=0.39/0.28/0.13/1.3, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1269089954 32si4566750iwn.51) Mar 20 12:59:14 Everest postfix/qmgr[27801]: C81C61C16A4: removed I've send to email to test services, and the report everything verifies ok. I've also checked all the RBL lists, and I'm not on any of them.

    Read the article

  • ip addresses/domain names are geographical bound?

    - by ajsie
    i wonder if ips are bound to specific geolocations? lets say that i've got this ip 111.111.111.111 from my ISP to my home computer in France. is it possible for me to use this ip in Norway? and the same goes with domain names. if iv'e got a domain name like mydomain.de, does it mean that my computer has to be in Germany or could it be located in Denmark? cause i always wonder where the actual server is located every time a website got different top level domains, eg google.dk, google.fr, google.de and so on. are they located in same country as the top domain or doesnt it matter?

    Read the article

  • 3G/Edge/GPRS IP addresses and geocoding

    - by LookitsPuck
    Hey all! So, we're looking to develop a mobile website. On this mobile website, we'd like to automatically populate a user's location (with proper fallback) based on their IP address. I'm aware of geocoding a location based on IP address (mapping to latitude, longitude and then getting the location with that information). However, I'm curious how accurate this information is? Are mobile devices assigned IP's when they utilize 3G, EDGE, and GPRS connections? I think so. If that is so, does it map to a relatively accurate location? It doesn't have to be spot on, but relatively accurate would be nice. Thanks! -Steve

    Read the article

  • Postfix Not Sending Email to Some Addresses?

    - by Jake
    I'm using Jetpack on Wordpress, and it wasn't working. I was getting the following error: Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; unknown user: "jake" --60FD1138CAD.1354039466/example.com Content-Description: Undelivered Message (example.com substituted for our domain) We set up a test mail function, and that wasn't sending either. We changed the email to an outside email and it worked. Any thoughts why it won't send to an email that is at the same domain? Or why it sends to some emails but not others? Upon running postconf -n, I get the following: alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases append_dot_mydomain = no biff = no config_directory = /etc/postfix inet_interfaces = all inet_protocols = all mailbox_size_limit = 0 mydestination = example.com, Example, localhost.localdomain, localhost myhostname = example.com mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 [::ffff:127.0.0.0]/104 [::1]/128 myorigin = /etc/mailname readme_directory = no recipient_delimiter = + relayhost = smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtp_scache smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Ubuntu) smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache smtpd_use_tls = yes

    Read the article

  • MAC addresses on dual-NIC mainboards

    - by Tom O'Connor
    Here's a weird problem. We've got a number of devices with dual-NIC mainboards. Some are Realtek NICs, which suck. Some are Intel e1000s, which don't. I've just noticed on 2 machines, one is an Intel NIC, one is a Realtek, that when I put the MAC address of one machine into the dhcpd.conf file on our DHCP server to get it to PXE boot the machine into a rebuild environment, initially everything is fine. The server gets a DHCP allocation, and PXE boots into the Ubuntu preseed enviroment. On one or two machines, it gets as far as Ubuntu's DHCP network configuration, and fails. If i pull up a busybox shell (on tty2 on the installing machine), and run ip link, I can see that the UP flag is set on the other NIC. Here's some stuff. host xeon16-ghz240-gb48-node1 { hardware ethernet BC:AE:C5:07:1F:18; filename "pxelinux.0"; next-server 192.168.123.80; } That's what's in dhcpd.conf This is what ip link on the evil machine looks like. Only one NIC is actually connected (deliberately). As you can see, the NIC that's in the dhcpd config, is not marked as UP, and the link that is UP, isn't the one in DHCP. So far I've seen this on two brands of dual-NIC configuration. Does anyone know 1) what's causing it, and b) What we can do about it?

    Read the article

  • Blocking RDP connections from secondary IP addresses

    - by user73995
    Hi, I have a webserver running Windows 2008 R2 with multiple IPs assigned to it. I want to be able to RDP to the box via the main IP assigned to the box but not from any of the secondary IPs (ie... the websites IPs). I assume if I had control of the Firewall I could shut off the RDP port to the secondary IPs but it's in a hosted environment and I don't have access to the firewall. I'll contact the host to see if that's available but was hoping there was a setting I could set on the machine itself to not resolve RDP requests from the additional IPs. Any advice?

    Read the article

  • Why do the IP addresses randomly change?

    - by GiddyUpHorsey
    I have a network with the following: Cable modem with static IP address Router Desktop - Win 7 VM Host - VMware ESXi 4.0 A couple of VM Guests - Windows Every now and then my Win 7 PC is unable to access some of the VMs. When I ping the VMs by their domain name their IP address shows up as the IP address of the cable modem. Sometimes I can fix it by running ipconfig /flushdns. The IP address will reset back to what it was supposed to be, but occasionally it wont work. Why does this happen and how can I fix it?

    Read the article

  • How to sniff for wireless MAC addresses in area - My laptop got stolen

    - by Mr AJL
    A few days ago my apartment got broken in, and they took all the electronics, including my $1500 laptop. We are pretty sure it's an inside job (as in someone from the same building), so I believe that the stuff is in someones apartment. Is there any tool that tells you what wireless adapters are active within range? I have my laptops MAC address, so I could use that to find out who stole it. I think it's worth a shot. Any help is appreciated thanks!

    Read the article

  • UDP packets to IP addresses other than specific ones not arriving and not shown in Wireshark

    - by Max
    I'm writing a service using UDP, but I can't manage to reply to the client. When sending to the client via the DHCP-assigned IP (192.168.1.143) Wireshark shows no sent packets. The server receives and Wireshark shows any packet sent by the client (broadcasted). If I send to a random, unassigned IP Wireshark doesn't show it. I thought the NIC would happily send it, since there is a router in the way - shouldn't Wireshark show it, even though it cannot possibly be received by a remote endpoint? If I send to either the router IP or another (specific, there is only one other) computer, the packet is shown in Wireshark. I am running Windows 7, the firewall is turned off using the control panel. Does the fact that wireshark doesn't show these packets mean that they aren't sent? What reason could there be for showing packets to one IP, but not another, on the same subnet?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >