Search Results

Search found 29816 results on 1193 pages for 'select tag'.

Page 73/1193 | < Previous Page | 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80  | Next Page >

  • Net::Cassandra::Easy equivalent of "SELECT * FROM ..."

    - by knorv
    When using Perl's Net::Cassandra::Easy the following code will retrieve columns col[1-3] from rows row[1-3]: $result = $cassandra->get(['row1', 'row2', 'row3'], family => 'Standard1', byname => ['col1', 'col2', 'col3'); The corresponding SQL would be: SELECT col1, col2, col3 FROM rows WHERE id IN ('row1', 'row2', 'row3'); Suppose instead that I want to retrieve all columns. In SQL terms that would be: SELECT * FROM rows WHERE id IN ('row1', 'row2', 'row3'); To get all columns I am currently using: $result = $cassandra->get(['row1', 'row2', 'row3'], family => 'Standard1', byoffset => { "count" => 1_000_000 }); This works as long as the number of columns does not exceed one million. While this works I'd assume that there is a cleaner way to do it. My question is: Is there any cleaner way to specify to Cassandra that I want to retrieve all columns for the maching rows?

    Read the article

  • Select query 2-3 times faster than view

    - by Richard Knop
    This query run alone: SELECT -- lots of columns FROM (((((((((((`table1` `t1` LEFT JOIN `table2` `t2` ON(( `t2`.`userid` = `t1`.`userid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table3` `t3` ON(( `t1`.`orderid` = `t3`.`orderid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table4` `t4` ON(( `t4`.`orderitemlicenseid` = `t3`.`orderitemlicenseid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table5` `t5` ON(( `t1`.`orderid` = `t5`.`orderid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table6` `t6` ON(( `t5`.`transactionid` = `t6`.`transactionid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table7` `t7` ON(( `t7`.`transactionid` = `t5`.`transactionid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table8` `t8` ON(( `t8`.`voucherid` = `t7`.`voucherid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table9` `t9` ON(( `t8`.`voucherid` = `t9`.`voucherid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table10` `t10` ON(( ( `t10`.`vouchergroupid` = `t9`.`vouchergroupid` ) AND ( `t2`.`territoryid` = `t10`.`territoryid` ) ))) LEFT JOIN `table11` `t11` ON(( `t11`.`voucherid` = `t8`.`voucherid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table12` `t12` ON(( `t12`.`orderid` = `t1`.`orderid` ))) GROUP BY `t5`.`transactionid` Takes about 2.5 seconds to finish. When I save it to a view and run it as: SELECT * FROM viewName; It takes 7 seconds to finish. What is the reason and how can I make the view faster?

    Read the article

  • MySQL differences between to select queries

    - by bpmccain
    I have two mysql queries that return a column of phone numbers. I want am trying to end up with a list of phone numbers that are in one list, but not in the other. So the two queries I have are: SELECT phone FROM civicrm_phone phone LEFT JOIN civicrm_participant participant ON phone.contact_id = participant.contact_id WHERE phone.is_primary = 1 AND participant.id IS NULL and SELECT phone FROM civicrm_phone phone LEFT JOIN civicrm_participant participant ON phone.contact_id = participant.contact_id WHERE phone.is_primary = 1 AND participant.id IS NOT NULL And before anyone asks, the above two queries do not provide mutually exclusive results (based on using IS NULL and IS NOT NULL for the last WHERE statement), since we have related individuals in the database who use the same phone number, but do not necessarily all have a participant.id. Thanks for any help.

    Read the article

  • change image upon selection, searching list for the src value jQuery

    - by Charles Marsh
    Hello all, Can anyone see anything that is wrong with this code it just isn't working... Should be clear what I am trying to do jQuery(document).ready(function($) { $('#product-variants-option-0').change(function() { // What is the sku of the current variant selection. var select_value = $(this).find(':selected').val(); if (select_value == "Kelly Green") { var keyword = "kly"; }; var new_src = $('#preload img[src*="kly"]'); $('div.image').attr('src', new_src); }); }); The selection: <select class="single-option-selector-0" id="product-variants-option-0"> <option value="Kelly Green">Kelly Green</option> <option value="Navy">Navy</option> <option value="Olive">Olive</option> <option value="Cocoa">Cocoa</option> </select> I'm trying to search an unordered list: <ul id="preload" style="display:none;"> <li>0z-kelly-green-medium.jpg</li> <li>0z-olive-medium.jpg</li> </ul>

    Read the article

  • Simple select not working on JDBC MSSQL ?

    - by Xinus
    I am trying to move project which was using MySQL database to the one that uses MSSQL 2008, But the select that was working in mysql is no longer working in MSSQL PreparedStatement statement = connection .prepareStatement("select u.user_firstname,u.user_lastname from user_details u, login l where l.username=? and l.login_user = u.user_id"); statement.setString(1, userName); ResultSet resultSet = (ResultSet) statement.executeQuery(); It always gives me empty resultset even when there are values corresponding to that username, When I run query using MSSQL management studio - query works properly i.e. it gives non-zero rows, Are there any MSSQL specific change I need to do ?

    Read the article

  • how to select the min value using having key word

    - by LOVE_KING
    I have created the table stu_dep_det CREATE TABLE `stu_dept_cs` ( `s_d_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment, `stu_name` varchar(15) , `gender` varchar(15) , `address` varchar(15),`reg_no` int(10) , `ex_no` varchar(10) , `mark1` varchar(10) , `mark2` varchar(15) , `mark3` varchar(15) , `total` varchar(15) , `avg` double(2,0), PRIMARY KEY (`s_d_id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC AUTO_INCREMENT=8 ; then Inserted the values INSERT INTO `stu_dept_cs` (`s_d_id`, `stu_name`, `gender`, `address`, `reg_no`, `ex_no`, `mark1`, `mark2`, `mark3`, `total`, `avg`) VALUES (1, 'alex', 'm', 'chennai', 5001, 's1', '70', '90', '95', '255', 85), (2, 'peter', 'm', 'chennai', 5002, 's1', '80', '70', '90', '240', 80), (6, 'parv', 'f', 'mumbai', 5003, 's1', '88', '60', '80', '228', 76), (7, 'basu', 'm', 'kolkatta', 5004, 's1', '85', '95', '56', '236', 79); I want to select the min(avg) using having keyword and I have used the following sql statement SELECT * FROM stu_dept_cs s having min(avg) Is it correct or not plz write the correct ans....

    Read the article

  • mysql - select pagination chunk that includes a given id

    - by sean smith
    ...before the pagination chunks have been determined. I know you can do this in multiple statements, but there must be a better way. my results are returned ordered by date and I want to return the pagination chunk that contains a given id. So I could, for example, select the date of the given id and then select a chunk of results where date is less than or greater than the date. That would work. But is there some native mysql method of doing this sort of thing in one statement? It just seems reasonable to expect that we could ask for X results in which a given id exists if results are ordered by date.

    Read the article

  • Need to add totals of select list, and subtract if taken away

    - by jeremy
    This is the code I am using to calculate the sum of two values (example below) http://www.healthybrighton.co.uk/wse/node/1841 This works to a degree. It will add the two together but only if #edit-submitted-test is selected first, and even then it will show NaN until I select #edit-submitted-test-1. I want it to calculate the sum of the fields and show the amount live, i.e. the value of edit-submitted-test-1 will show 500, then if i select another field it will update to 1000. If i take one selection away it will then subtract it and will be back to 500. Any ideas would be helpful thanks! Drupal.behaviors.bookingForm = function (context) { // some debugging here, remove when you're finished console.log('[bookingForm] started.'); // get number of travelers and multiply it by 100 function recalculateTotal() { var count = $('#edit-submitted-test').val(); count = parseFloat( count ); var cost = $('#edit-submitted-test-1').val(); cost = parseFloat( cost ); $('#edit-submitted-total').val( count + cost ); } // run recalculateTotal every time user enters a new value var fieldCount = $('#edit-submitted-test'); var fieldCount = $('#edit-submitted-test-1'); fieldCount.change( recalculateTotal ); // etc ... }; EDIT This is all working beautiful, however I now want to add all the values together, and automatically update a total cost field that is the sum of a the added field with code above and field with value passed from previous page. I did this where accomcost is the field that is added together, but the total cost field does update, but not automatically, it is always one selection behind. i.e. If i select options and accomodation cost updates to £900, total cost remains empty. If i then change the selection and the accomodation updates to £300, the total cost updates to the previous selection of £900. Any help on this one Felix? ;) thanks. var accomcost = $('#edit-submitted-accomodation-cost').val(); accomcost = accomcost ? parseFloat(accomcost) : 0; var coursescost = $('#edit-submitted-courses-cost-2').val(); coursescost = coursescost ? parseFloat(coursescost) : 0; $('#edit-submitted-accomodation-cost').val( w1 + w2 + w3 + w4 + w5 + w6 + w7 + w8 + w9 + w10 + w11 + w12 + w13 + w14 + w15 + w16 + w17 + w18 + w19 + w20 + w21 + w22 + w23 + w24 + w25 + w26 + w27 + w28 + w29 + w30 ); $('#edit-submitted-total-cost').val( accomcost + coursescost ); var fieldCount = $('#edit-submitted-accomodation-cost, #edit-submitted-courses-cost-2') .change( recalculateTotal );

    Read the article

  • How to disable the all Fieldset Input, textarea, select except input checkbox

    - by kumar
    Hello friends, I have this code in my view this code will execute each users based on selection if I select 3 users this code will execute three times and displays three seperates in same page with differnt users.. Here is my code... I used this code.. this is disabling only frist user Fieldset not for all other fieldsets? and in this Fieldset Except Input check box I need to disabled all other Inpu,select,textarea.. need to disabled.. Please can any one help me I need to hide all the Fieldsets.. thanks

    Read the article

  • SELECT SUM returns a row when there are no records

    - by Jose L Martinez-Avial
    Hi, I'm finding some problems with a query that returns the sum of a field from a table for all the records that meet certain conditions. I expected to receive a "No records found' when there were no records, but instead I'm receiving a null result. SQL> SELECT * FROM DUAL WHERE 1=2; no rows selected SQL> SELECT SUM(dummy) FROM DUAL WHERE 1=2; SUM(DUMMY) ---------- SQL> Is there any way to not receive any record in that case?

    Read the article

  • Hibernate advanced select

    - by Marcus
    We want to get a row from a table using Hibernate a la: select max(id) from mytable where date = <date> Then select * from mytable where id = <max_id> We are currently using Hibernate to map mytable to Java domain objects. I know how to load the domain object based on an id. So I could just do #1 using JDBC and then load the domain object using Hibernate the "normal" way. But.. is there a way to do this with one single Hibernate logical query?

    Read the article

  • Can't select View Content dropdown when adding view in MVC using Interfaces

    - by fearofawhackplanet
    I have my Model defined externally in two projects - a Core project and an Interface project. I am opening the Add View dialogue from my controller, and selecting Create a strongly typed view. In the drop down list, I can select the concrete types like MyProject.Model.Core.OrderDetails, but the interface types like MyProject.Model.Interface.IOrderDetails aren't there. I can type the interface class in manually and everything works, but then the View content menu that lets you select the Create, Delete, List, etc scaffolding is disabled. Is there some problem with using interfaces in MVC? Or is it something else I'm missing?

    Read the article

  • How can I factor out repeated expressions in an SQL Query? Column aliases don't seem to be the ticke

    - by Weston C
    So, I've got a query that looks something like this: SELECT id, DATE_FORMAT(CONVERT_TZ(callTime,'+0:00','-7:00'),'%b %d %Y') as callDate, DATE_FORMAT(CONVERT_TZ(callTime,'+0:00','-7:00'),'%H:%i') as callTimeOfDay, SEC_TO_TIME(callLength) as callLength FROM cs_calldata WHERE customerCode='999999-abc-blahblahblah' AND CONVERT_TZ(callTime,'+0:00','-7:00') >= '2010-04-25' AND CONVERT_TZ(callTime,'+0:00','-7:00') <= '2010-05-25' If you're like me, you probably start thinking that maybe it would improve readability and possibly the performance of this query if I wasn't asking it to compute CONVERT_TZ(callTime,'+0:00','-7:00') four separate times. So I try to create a column alias for that expression and replace further occurances with that alias: SELECT id, CONVERT_TZ(callTime,'+0:00','-7:00') as callTimeZoned, DATE_FORMAT(callTimeZoned,'%b %d %Y') as callDate, DATE_FORMAT(callTimeZoned,'%H:%i') as callTimeOfDay, SEC_TO_TIME(callLength) as callLength FROM cs_calldata WHERE customerCode='5999999-abc-blahblahblah' AND callTimeZoned >= '2010-04-25' AND callTimeZoned <= '2010-05-25' This is when I learned, to quote the MySQL manual: Standard SQL disallows references to column aliases in a WHERE clause. This restriction is imposed because when the WHERE clause is evaluated, the column value may not yet have been determined. So, that approach would seem to be dead in the water. How is someone writing queries with recurring expressions like this supposed to deal with it?

    Read the article

  • css dropdownlist /combox <select

    - by teki
    i am using bassistance.de form validation please look at the demo here i have few dropdownlist and when it validates i want that dropdonwlist to be dotted with red which is not happening and i have even add the .css line please see below. please have a look at the demo to get an idea what i am asking for. div.error { display: none; } input { border: 1px solid black; } input.checkbox { border: none } input:focus { border: 1px dotted black; } input.error { border: 1px dotted red; } textarea.error { border: 1px dotted red; } **select.error { border: 1px dotted red; }** form.cmxform .gray * { color: gray; } PS: some how it ignores "select.error..."

    Read the article

  • Custom Validation on jquery validate plugin, need to count element in a multiple select

    - by 0plus1
    I have a multiple select, and I need to force the user to choose maximum two options, nothing more. I'm trying this: jQuery.validator.addMethod("morethantwo", function(value, element) { var foo = []; $(element+' :selected').each(function(i, selected){ foo[i] = $(selected).text(); alert(foo[i]); }); return true; },"Max two options." ); The problem is that I get a: uncaught exception: Syntax error, unrecognized expression: [object HTMLSelectElement] error. While if I do this: $(element).each(function(i, selected){ foo[i] = $(selected).text(); alert(foo[i]); }); It works but I get all the options in the select. Why is that? Is this the correct road to walk? Are there better ways to do this kind of check? Thank you very much!

    Read the article

  • MySQL Select problems

    - by John Nuñez
    Table #1: qa_returns_items Table #2: qa_returns_residues I have a long time trying to get this Result: item_code - item_quantity 2 - 1 3 - 2 IF qa_returns_items.item_code = qa_returns_residues.item_code AND status_code = 11 THEN item_quantity = qa_returns_items.item_quantity - qa_returns_residues.item_quantity ELSEIF qa_returns_items.item_code = qa_returns_residues.item_code AND status_code = 12 THEN item_quantity = qa_returns_items.item_quantity + qa_returns_residues.item_quantity ELSE show diferendes END IF I tried this Query: select SubQueryAlias.item_code, total_ecuation, SubQueryAlias.item_unitprice, SubQueryAlias.item_unitprice * total_ecuation as item_subtotal, item_discount, (SubQueryAlias.item_unitprice * total_ecuation) - item_discount as item_total from ( select ri.item_code , case status_code when 11 then ri.item_quantity - rr.item_quantity when 12 then ri.item_quantity + rr.item_quantity end as total_ecuation , rr.item_unitprice , rr.item_quantity , rr.item_discount * rr.item_quantity as item_discount from qa_returns_residues rr left join qa_returns_items ri on ri.item_code = rr.item_code WHERE ri.returnlog_code = 1 ) as SubQueryAlias where total_ecuation > 0 GROUP BY (item_code); The query returns this result: item_code - item_quantity 1 - 2 2 - 2

    Read the article

  • Xpath how to select an element based on an order and dependent of its existence

    - by hokkos
    Hi, how to select an element based on an order and dependent of its existence in XPath ? For example how to select the best quality video if it exist. <VIDEOS> <LOW_RES>video_L.flv</LOW_RES> <HI_RES>video_H.flv</HI_RES> <HD/> </VIDEOS> this should return video_H.flv because the hd version doesn't exist this case can exist (the videos names can be random): <VIDEOS> <LOW_RES>video_L.flv</LOW_RES> <HI_RES>video_H.flv</HI_RES> <HD>video_hd.mp4</HD> </VIDEOS> this should return video_hd.mp4 because the hd version exist. Many thanks.

    Read the article

  • MySql SELECT AS - Append all field names

    - by jeerose
    I'd like to do something like this: SELECT table.id AS prefix_id, table.name AS prefix_name ... and have the prefix added dynamically to all field names rather than selecting them all manually (ie SELECT table.* AS prefix_* or something) Hopefully I've described that accurately. Any thoughts? Edit To be clear, the reason I'm asking is to make sure that my query result contains every column from each table I call even if there are duplicate field names. For example, I might have a table with lots of fields which means I don't want to alias all the fields manually. Further if 3 tables have a field called name my result won't contain three name results; it will have one. I want to avoid ambiguity with my column names.

    Read the article

  • How to select a names from a column MS Excel 2007

    - by Alks
    Hey guys, I have an Excel document which has a list of students and their group names. I have another sheet within the the same excel document which is called comments. In this sheet, I would like to have a list of individual team names listed. There are 65 students and 14 defined groups. Is there a way to select the 14 group names, without repitition? Cell B3-B67 have the student names. Cell C3-C67 have the team names. The team names are entered against each student. I know in SQL I could use something like select distinct(team_name) but in Excel, how can I replicate this? Cheers, Alks.

    Read the article

  • Selecting Entity Data Model Laguage -- Visual C# source file generated even when i select VB

    - by Nickson
    Am adding an Entity Data Model to an ASP.NET website. When i Add New Item to the website and select ADO.NET Entity Data Model, am asked for the model name and language. I go a head and select Visual Basic as the language, the model is added and the site can compile with out any issues. however, the model it adds a ModelName.Designer.cs source file, instead of a ModelName.Designer.vb source file. am thinking this is strange as its happening with only one of my website. my other sites have .vb designer source file for their Entity Data Models. The site still compiles with out any errors but am afraid some thing is not right. any one experienced this?, is this normal behavior?

    Read the article

  • How to select difference using sql?

    - by ganuke
    I wrote a sql query to retrieve data as follows: SELECT (MAX (b.filledqty) - MAX (a.filledqty)) AS filledtoday FROM clientordermas a, clientordermas b WHERE a.clordid = 'w9110126' AND b.clordid = 'w9110126' AND (SELECT max(a.price) FROM clientordermas a WHERE a.clordid = 'w9110126') < 1000; There are three records in the table for the given clordid with price values 800, 900 1200. So, what I need is to get the difference between 1200 and 900 which is 300. But, the above statement always returns 0. What I should get is MAX (b.filledqty) retuns 1200 and MAX (a.filledqty) retuns 900. But it is not happening. This is not the exact problem I am facing but a simplified version of it. Can someone please help?

    Read the article

  • Select from table and function

    - by David Oneill
    I have a function that returns a table. The returned table contains (among other things) a store_id. I can get the store_id for a particular transaction_id and city_id as follows: select store_id from table(f_get_store(city_id, transaction_id)); I have another table that contains a list of transactions (which includes transaction_id and city_id). I want a query that returns store_id, city_id, transaction_id for every entry in the transaction table. My first guess was: select f_get_store(city_id, transaction_id), city_id, transaction_id from table; (simplified away the unimportant details) However, this yields an "ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes" error. How do I need to structure this query? (I'm using Oracle)

    Read the article

  • DataView Vs DataTable.Select()

    - by Aseem Gautam
    Considering the code below: Dataview someView = new DataView(sometable) someView.RowFilter = someFilter; if(someView.count > 0) { …. } Quite a number of articles which say Datatable.Select() is better than using DataViews, but these are prior to VS2008. Solved: The Mystery of DataView's Poor Performance with Large Recordsets Array of DataRecord vs. DataView: A Dramatic Difference in Performance So in a situation where I just want a subset of datarows based on some filter criteria(single query) and what is better DataView or DataTable.Select()?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80  | Next Page >