Search Results

Search found 29239 results on 1170 pages for 'site collection'.

Page 89/1170 | < Previous Page | 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96  | Next Page >

  • Using WeakReference to resolve issue with .NET unregistered event handlers causing memory leaks.

    - by Eric
    The problem: Registered event handlers create a reference from the event to the event handler's instance. If that instance fails to unregister the event handler (via Dispose, presumably), then the instance memory will not be freed by the garbage collector. Example: class Foo { public event Action AnEvent; public void DoEvent() { if (AnEvent != null) AnEvent(); } } class Bar { public Bar(Foo l) { l.AnEvent += l_AnEvent; } void l_AnEvent() { } } If I instantiate a Foo, and pass this to a new Bar constructor, then let go of the Bar object, it will not be freed by the garbage collector because of the AnEvent registration. I consider this a memory leak, and seems just like my old C++ days. I can, of course, make Bar IDisposable, unregister the event in the Dispose() method, and make sure to call Dispose() on instances of it, but why should I have to do this? I first question why events are implemented with strong references? Why not use weak references? An event is used to abstractly notify an object of changes in another object. It seems to me that if the event handler's instance is no longer in use (i.e., there are no non-event references to the object), then any events that it is registered with should automatically be unregistered. What am I missing? I have looked at WeakEventManager. Wow, what a pain. Not only is it very difficult to use, but its documentation is inadequate (see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.weakeventmanager.aspx -- noticing the "Notes to Inheritors" section that has 6 vaguely described bullets). I have seen other discussions in various places, but nothing I felt I could use. I propose a simpler solution based on WeakReference, as described here. My question is: Does this not meet the requirements with significantly less complexity? To use the solution, the above code is modified as follows: class Foo { public WeakReferenceEvent AnEvent = new WeakReferenceEvent(); internal void DoEvent() { AnEvent.Invoke(); } } class Bar { public Bar(Foo l) { l.AnEvent += l_AnEvent; } void l_AnEvent() { } } Notice two things: 1. The Foo class is modified in two ways: The event is replaced with an instance of WeakReferenceEvent, shown below; and the invocation of the event is changed. 2. The Bar class is UNCHANGED. No need to subclass WeakEventManager, implement IWeakEventListener, etc. OK, so on to the implementation of WeakReferenceEvent. This is shown here. Note that it uses the generic WeakReference that I borrowed from here: http://damieng.com/blog/2006/08/01/implementingweakreferencet I had to add Equals() and GetHashCode() to his class, which I include below for reference. class WeakReferenceEvent { public static WeakReferenceEvent operator +(WeakReferenceEvent wre, Action handler) { wre._delegates.Add(new WeakReference<Action>(handler)); return wre; } public static WeakReferenceEvent operator -(WeakReferenceEvent wre, Action handler) { foreach (var del in wre._delegates) if (del.Target == handler) { wre._delegates.Remove(del); return wre; } return wre; } HashSet<WeakReference<Action>> _delegates = new HashSet<WeakReference<Action>>(); internal void Invoke() { HashSet<WeakReference<Action>> toRemove = null; foreach (var del in _delegates) { if (del.IsAlive) del.Target(); else { if (toRemove == null) toRemove = new HashSet<WeakReference<Action>>(); toRemove.Add(del); } } if (toRemove != null) foreach (var del in toRemove) _delegates.Remove(del); } } public class WeakReference<T> : IDisposable { private GCHandle handle; private bool trackResurrection; public WeakReference(T target) : this(target, false) { } public WeakReference(T target, bool trackResurrection) { this.trackResurrection = trackResurrection; this.Target = target; } ~WeakReference() { Dispose(); } public void Dispose() { handle.Free(); GC.SuppressFinalize(this); } public virtual bool IsAlive { get { return (handle.Target != null); } } public virtual bool TrackResurrection { get { return this.trackResurrection; } } public virtual T Target { get { object o = handle.Target; if ((o == null) || (!(o is T))) return default(T); else return (T)o; } set { handle = GCHandle.Alloc(value, this.trackResurrection ? GCHandleType.WeakTrackResurrection : GCHandleType.Weak); } } public override bool Equals(object obj) { var other = obj as WeakReference<T>; return other != null && Target.Equals(other.Target); } public override int GetHashCode() { return Target.GetHashCode(); } } It's functionality is trivial. I override operator + and - to get the += and -= syntactic sugar matching events. These create WeakReferences to the Action delegate. This allows the garbage collector to free the event target object (Bar in this example) when nobody else is holding on to it. In the Invoke() method, simply run through the weak references and call their Target Action. If any dead (i.e., garbage collected) references are found, remove them from the list. Of course, this only works with delegates of type Action. I tried making this generic, but ran into the missing where T : delegate in C#! As an alternative, simply modify class WeakReferenceEvent to be a WeakReferenceEvent, and replace the Action with Action. Fix the compiler errors and you have a class that can be used like so: class Foo { public WeakReferenceEvent<int> AnEvent = new WeakReferenceEvent<int>(); internal void DoEvent() { AnEvent.Invoke(5); } } Hopefully this will help someone else when they run into the mystery .NET event memory leak!

    Read the article

  • Error Message, "The Controls collection cannot be modified because the control contains code blocks"

    - by Gogster
    I'm receiving this error on a page that previously worked fine, in fact the only change I've made to the page recently was to add another asp:TextBox and asp:RequiredFieldValidator control. The page already had numerous ASP.NET controls on it, so I cannot see why these extra controls would make a difference, anyway I shall post the code below and hopefully you can see what the error is: <%@ Control Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeFile="MeetingGenerator.ascx.cs" Inherits="usercontrols_MeetingGenerator" %> <%@ Register TagPrefix="cc1" Assembly="AjaxControlToolkit" Namespace="AjaxControlToolkit" %> <asp:ScriptManager ID="ScriptManager1" runat="server"></asp:ScriptManager> <div style="width:498px;height:425px;background-color:#033b2a;text-align:center;padding-top:20px;"> <asp:Label ID="lblDone" CssClass="done" runat="server"></asp:Label> <asp:Panel id="pnlAddReport" runat="server"> <div> <img src="../images/banners/add-meeting.png" alt="Add Report" /> </div> <p> <asp:ValidationSummary ID="ValidationSummary" CssClass="validationsummary" runat="server" /> <asp:TextBox ID="txtTitle" BorderStyle="None" CssClass="watermark" Width="250px" Height="22px" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <cc1:TextBoxWatermarkExtender ID="TextBoxWatermarkExtender1" TargetControlID="txtTitle" WatermarkCssClass="watermark" WatermarkText=" Meeting title" runat="server"></cc1:TextBoxWatermarkExtender> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="rfvTitle" ControlToValidate="txtTitle" Text="" ErrorMessage="Please enter the title" Display="None" InitialValue="" runat="server"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="rfvTitle1" ControlToValidate="txtTitle" Text="" ErrorMessage="Please enter the title" Display="None" InitialValue=" Meeting title" runat="server"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator> </p> <p> <asp:TextBox ID="txtDate" BorderStyle="None" CssClass="watermark" Width="250px" Height="22px" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <cc1:CalendarExtender ID="ceDate" TargetControlID="txtDate" Format="dd/MM/yyyy" runat="server"> </cc1:CalendarExtender> <cc1:TextBoxWatermarkExtender ID="TextBoxWatermarkExtender2" TargetControlID="txtDate" WatermarkCssClass="watermark" WatermarkText=" Meeting Date" runat="server"></cc1:TextBoxWatermarkExtender> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="rfvDate" ControlToValidate="txtDate" Text="" ErrorMessage="Please select the meeting date" Display="None" InitialValue="" runat="server"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="rfvDate1" ControlToValidate="txtDate" Text="" ErrorMessage="Please select the meeting date" Display="None" InitialValue=" Meeting Date" runat="server"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator> </p> <p> <asp:TextBox ID="txtMeetingTime" BorderStyle="None" Width="250px" Height="22px" MaxLength="5" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <cc1:TextBoxWatermarkExtender ID="tweMeetingTime" TargetControlID="txtMeetingTime" WatermarkCssClass="watermark" WatermarkText=" Time (HH:MM)" runat="server"></cc1:TextBoxWatermarkExtender> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator1" ControlToValidate="txtMeetingTime" Text="" ErrorMessage="Please enter the meeting time" Display="None" InitialValue="" runat="server"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator11" ControlToValidate="txtMeetingTime" Text="" ErrorMessage="Please enter the meeting time" Display="None" InitialValue=" Time (HH:MM)" runat="server"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator> </p> <p> <asp:TextBox ID="txtLocation" BorderStyle="None" CssClass="watermark" Width="250px" Height="22px" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <cc1:TextBoxWatermarkExtender ID="TextBoxWatermarkExtender3" TargetControlID="txtLocation" WatermarkCssClass="watermark" WatermarkText=" Location" runat="server"></cc1:TextBoxWatermarkExtender> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="rfvLocation" ControlToValidate="txtLocation" Text="" ErrorMessage="Please enter the location" Display="None" InitialValue="" runat="server"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="rfvLocation1" ControlToValidate="txtLocation" Text="" ErrorMessage="Please enter the location" Display="None" InitialValue=" Location" runat="server"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator> </p> <p> <asp:ImageButton ID="btnAddMeeting" ImageUrl="/images/buttons/addmeeting-btn.gif" runat="server" OnClick="btnAddMeeting_Click" /> </p> <p> </p> </asp:Panel> </div> <%@ Master Language="C#" MasterPageFile="/masterpages/Master.master" AutoEventWireup="true" %> <asp:content ContentPlaceHolderId="additionalhead" runat="server"> </asp:content> <asp:content ContentPlaceHolderId="additionalbody" runat="server"> <umbraco:Macro Alias="AddMeeting" runat="server"></umbraco:Macro> </asp:content> <asp:content ContentPlaceHolderId="bodyContent" runat="server"> </asp:content> <%@ Master Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" %> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head runat="server"> <title><umbraco:Item field="title" runat="server"></umbraco:Item></title> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3.2/jquery.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.7.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="/js/jQueryString-2.0.2-Min.js"></script> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/css/Styles.css" /> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/css/Layout.css" /> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/css/Forms.css" /> <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { $('#uploadAgenda').hide(); $('#uploadMinutes').hide(); $('#<%=txtSearchEAA.ClientID%>').val('Search EAA'); var st = $.getQueryString({ ID:"search" }); if (st != '') { $('#<%=txtSearchEAA.ClientID%>').val(st); }; $('#<%=txtSearchEAA.ClientID%>').click(function() { $('#<%=txtSearchEAA.ClientID%>').val(''); }); }); </script> <script type="text/C#" runat="server"> protected void btnSearch_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { Response.Redirect("/members/search-results?search=" + txtSearchEAA.Text); } </script> <asp:ContentPlaceHolder id="additionalhead" runat="server"></asp:ContentPlaceHolder> <umbraco:Item field="AdditionalHead" runat="server"></umbraco:Item> </head> <body style="background-color:#e5e5e5;"> <script runat="server"> protected void btnLogout_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { FormsAuthentication.SignOut(); Response.Redirect("/login"); } </script> <form id="form1" runat="server"> <asp:ContentPlaceHolder id="additionalbody" runat="server"></asp:ContentPlaceHolder> <div class="wrapper"> <div class="content"> <div class="banner"> <div class="bannerSearchSpacer"> <a href="/home"><h1><span>EAA</span></h1></a> </div> <div class="aboutEAA"> &nbsp; </div> <div class="bannerSearchAligns"> <div class="searchbox"> <asp:TextBox ID="txtSearchEAA" CssClass="watermark" Width="155px" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> </div> <div class="searchButton"> <asp:ImageButton ID="imbSearch" ImageUrl="/images/buttons/go.gif" OnClick="btnSearch_Click" runat="server" /> </div> <div style="clear:both;"></div> </div> <div class="loginBox"> <dl> <dt>Hello</dt> <dd><umbraco:Macro Alias="MemberName" runat="server"></umbraco:Macro></dd> <dt>Arena</dt> <dd><umbraco:Macro Alias="MemberArena" runat="server"></umbraco:Macro></dd> </dl> <div><asp:ImageButton ID="btnLogout" ImageUrl="/images/buttons/logout.gif" runat="server" OnClick="btnLogout_Click" /></div> </div> <div style="clear:both;"></div> </div> <div id="contentarea"> <div class="menuLeft"> <div class="menuPlaceholder"> <umbraco:Macro Alias="DynamicMenu" runat="server"></umbraco:Macro> </div> </div> <div class="mainBody"> <asp:ContentPlaceHolder id="bodyContent" runat="server"></asp:ContentPlaceHolder> </div> <div style="clear:both;"></div> </div> </div> </div> </form> <umbraco:Macro Alias="MemberAnalytics" runat="server"></umbraco:Macro> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • Java -Xms initial size effects

    - by SyBer
    Hi. What is the benefit of setting the -Xms parameter, and having the initial memory larger for example, then the default calculated one (64 MB in my case, according to Java GC tunning: http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/hotspot/gc/gc_tuning_6.html#par_gc.ergonomics.default_size)? Also, is there any good to setting both the initial and maximum memories to same size? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Reasons why one should not call the garbage collector directly.

    - by Shimrod
    Hi everyone, I'm currently writing a paper for my company, about how to avoid calling the garbage collector directly from the code (when playing with COM objects for instance). I know this is a bad practice, and should be only considered in very rare cases, but I can't seem to find a way to tell why it should be avoided. And I don't want to rely on the "The G.C. is smarter than you" principle (even if it is the truth :-) ) So can you tell me some clues about why you think one should avoid to call the garbage collector directly ? (performance impact?) Or maybe if you have links about this particular topic, they would be very helpful. Thanks in advance !

    Read the article

  • Mongomapper query collection problem

    - by kylemac
    When I define the User has_many meetings, it automatically creates a "user_id" key/value pair to relate to the User collections. Except I can't run any mongo_mapper finds using this value, without it returning nil or []. Meeting.first(:user_id = "1234") Meeting.all(:user_id = "1234") Meeting.find(:user_id = "1234") All return nil. Is there another syntax? Basically I can't run a query on the automatically generated associative ObjectId. # Methods class User include MongoMapper::Document key :user_name, String, :required = true key :password, String many :meetings end class Meeting include MongoMapper::Document key :name, String, :required = true key :count, Integer, :default = 1 end # Sinatra get '/add' do user = User.new user.meetings "foobar") #should read: Meeting.new(:name = "foobar") user.save end get '/find' do test = Meeting.first(:user_id = "4b4f9d6d348f82370b000001") #this is the _id of the newly create user p test # WTF! returns [] end

    Read the article

  • object won't die (still references to it that I can't find)

    - by user288558
    I'm using parallel-python and start a new job server in a function. after the functions ends it still exists even though I didn't return it out of the function (I used weakref to test this). I guess there's still some references to this object somewhere. My two theories: It starts threads and it logs to root logger. My questions: can I somehow findout in which namespace there is still a reference to this object. I have the weakref reference. Does anyone know how to detach a logger? What other debug suggestions do people have? here is my testcode: def pptester(): js=pp.Server(ppservers=nodes) js.set_ncpus(0) fh=file('tmp.tmp.tmp','w') tmp=[] for i in range(200): tmp.append(js.submit(ppworktest,(),(),('os','subprocess'))) js.print_stats() return weakref.ref(js) thanks in advance Wolfgang

    Read the article

  • Will the following code be Garbage Collected before the class "dies"?

    - by devoured elysium
    Let's say we have the following code in a class: //class code TextBox t = new TextBox(); ListBox l = new ListBox(); We have then two possible situations: In the first, we declare qem1 as a class variable(or attribute, as they call it in the Java World): //class variable QuickEntryMediator qem1 = new QuickEntryMediator(t,l); In the second, we declare it inside a method: //method variable QuickEntryMediator qem2 = new QuickEntryMediator(t,l); So, I'd say qem1 would never be Garbage Collected before the class goes out of scope while in the qem2 might be Garbage Collected at any time after the method in which it resides dies. Is this true? I am looking for answers for both C#(.net) and Java, as am I am not sure both GC's work in the same fashion! Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to protect/monitor your site from crawling by malicious user

    - by deathy
    Situation: Site with content protected by username/password (not all controlled since they can be trial/test users) a normal search engine can't get at it because of username/password restrictions a malicious user can still login and pass the session cookie to a "wget -r" or something else. The question would be what is the best solution to monitor such activity and respond to it (considering the site policy is no-crawling/scraping allowed) I can think of some options: Set up some traffic monitoring solution to limit the number of requests for a given user/IP. Related to the first point: Automatically block some user-agents (Evil :)) Set up a hidden link that when accessed logs out the user and disables his account. (Presumably this would not be accessed by a normal user since he wouldn't see it to click it, but a bot will crawl all links.) For point 1. do you know of a good already-implemented solution? Any experiences with it? One problem would be that some false positives might show up for very active but human users. For point 3: do you think this is really evil? Or do you see any possible problems with it? Also accepting other suggestions.

    Read the article

  • GC.AddMemoryPressure in C#

    - by ssheldon
    I am writing an application in C# that makes use of a 3rd party COM DLL, this dll creates a lot of resources (like bitmaps, video, data structures) in unmanaged memory. While digging around I came across the following call for the Garbage Collector: GC.AddMemoryPressure(long long bytesAllocated) It is documented in MSDN here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.gc.addmemorypressure.aspx This sounds like something I should be calling since this external dll is createing a lot of resources the CLR is unaware of. I guess I have two questions... How do I know how much memory pressure to add when the dll is 3rd party and it's not possible for me to know exactly how much memory this dll is allocating. How important is it to do this?

    Read the article

  • Weak References and Disposable objects.

    - by Steve Sheldon
    In C# it is possible to create weak references to objects as described here: WeakReference Class In .net some classes also implement the IDisposable interface. Calling the Dispose method of this interface is performed to manually dispose of any managed or unmanaged resources currently being held onto. An example might be a Bitmap object or class. If I assign an object that implements IDisposable to a weak reference, will Dispose be called if the weak reference collects the object?

    Read the article

  • DataTable to Object collection

    - by Kenneth Cochran
    I'm working on a data import feature and I've been able to load an excel sheet into a DataTable using Ado.NET with the MSJet db engine. I created a simple one-to-one mapping dialog, in which the user drags column headings from their spreadsheet to a list of object properties. What's stumping me is how to turn each DataRow into a business object. Is there an easy way to do this? If there is a better way than using a DataTable as a middleman I'm open to suggestion? I use NHibernate extensively through out the rest of my program but I couldn't find any attempts to map to an excel spreadsheet. I went with a DataTable because the technique was well documented.

    Read the article

  • Proper use of the IDisposable interface

    - by cwick
    I know from reading the MSDN documentation that the "primary" use of the IDisposable interface is to clean up unmanaged resources http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.idisposable.aspx. To me, "unmanaged" means things like database connections, sockets, window handles, etc. But, I've seen code where the Dispose method is implemented to free managed resources, which seems redundant to me, since the garbage collector should take care of that for you. For example: public class MyCollection : IDisposable { private List<String> _theList = new List<String>(); private Dictionary<String, Point> _theDict = new Dictionary<String, Point>(); // Die, you gravy sucking pig dog! public void Dispose() { _theList.clear(); _theDict.clear(); _theList = null; _theDict = null; } My question is, does this make the garbage collector free memory used by MyCollection any faster than it normally would? edit: So far people have posted some good examples of using IDisposable to clean up unmanaged resources such as database connections and bitmaps. But suppose that _theList in the above code contained a million strings, and you wanted to free that memory now, rather than waiting for the garbage collector. Would the above code accomplish that?

    Read the article

  • How to shutdown the UDC (usage data collection) from eclipse

    - by damian
    I want to shutdown the UDC. It's very heavy for my pc. I already uncheck the "Enable Capture" checkbox but I have the feeling that it stay enable in the background. It constantly ask me the user and password of the proxy. I do not want an eclipse always trying to connect to internet and doing background procesing that I don't need.

    Read the article

  • Intersect a collection of collections in LINQ

    - by Larsenal
    I've got a list of lists which I want to intersect: List<List<int>> input = new List<List<int>>(); input.Add(new List<int>() { 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 }); input.Add(new List<int>() { 3, 4, 5 }); input.Add(new List<int>() { 1, 4, 5, 6 }); Output should be { 4, 5 } How can this be accomplished in a terse fashion?

    Read the article

  • Holding value in collection

    - by Amit Ranjan
    I have a application which is on timesheet. I have total of 54 columns out of which 10 columns are visible rest invisible. First 3 columns are Project, MileStone and Classes. Rest are Sun- Sat work hrs. Now I have a column named 'taskid' as SunTaskID,MonTaskID and so on till SatTaskID for holding each days taskid. Now on the selection of SunHrs (Sunday's Work Hrs), i retrieve that days taskid and on the basis of task id i retrieve attachments which is displayed under a listbox. Now the problem is that since a day can have multiple attachments and a user can attach multiple attachments at time. He can enter values from grid to. Grid cells are editable. I am using BindingList(of TaskClass) in VB.Net for binding grid. I have total 54 properties n my task class. So i want to what property do i need to hod each days attachment and in what way. Earlier I tried Dictionary. But i was not aware of its usage as a property so i gave. Then prepared a separate class for attachment but, it was difficult to synchronize the existing attachments with taskid...

    Read the article

  • Custom Collection Initializers

    - by Jake
    Classes that implement IEnumerable and provide a public void Add(/* args */) function can be initialized like in the following example: List<int> numbers = new List<int>{ 1, 2, 3 }; which calls the Add(int) function 3x after initializing the List<int>. Is there a way to define this behavior explicitly for my own classes? For example, could I have the initializer call a function other than the appropriate Add() overload?

    Read the article

  • How do I get .NET to garbage collect aggressively?

    - by mmr
    I have an application that is used in image processing, and I find myself typically allocating arrays in the 4000x4000 ushort size, as well as the occasional float and the like. Currently, the .NET framework tends to crash in this app apparently randomly, almost always with an out of memory error. 32mb is not a huge declaration, but if .NET is fragmenting memory, then it's very possible that such large continuous allocations aren't behaving as expected. Is there a way to tell the garbage collector to be more aggressive, or to defrag memory (if that's the problem)? I realize that there's the GC.Collect and GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers calls, and I've sprinkled them pretty liberally through my code, but I'm still getting the errors. It may be because I'm calling dll routines that use native code a lot, but I'm not sure. I've gone over that C++ code, and make sure that any memory I declare I delete, but still I get these C# crashes, so I'm pretty sure it's not there. I wonder if the C++ calls could be interfering with the GC, making it leave behind memory because it once interacted with a native call-- is that possible? If so, can I turn that functionality off? EDIT: Here is some very specific code that will cause the crash. According to this SO question, I do not need to be disposing of the BitmapSource objects here. Here is the naive version, no GC.Collects in it. It generally crashes on iteration 4 to 10 of the undo procedure. This code replaces the constructor in a blank WPF project, since I'm using WPF. I do the wackiness with the bitmapsource because of the limitations I explained in my answer to @dthorpe below as well as the requirements listed in this SO question. public partial class Window1 : Window { public Window1() { InitializeComponent(); //Attempts to create an OOM crash //to do so, mimic minute croppings of an 'image' (ushort array), and then undoing the crops int theRows = 4000, currRows; int theColumns = 4000, currCols; int theMaxChange = 30; int i; List<ushort[]> theList = new List<ushort[]>();//the list of images in the undo/redo stack byte[] displayBuffer = null;//the buffer used as a bitmap source BitmapSource theSource = null; for (i = 0; i < theMaxChange; i++) { currRows = theRows - i; currCols = theColumns - i; theList.Add(new ushort[(theRows - i) * (theColumns - i)]); displayBuffer = new byte[theList[i].Length]; theSource = BitmapSource.Create(currCols, currRows, 96, 96, PixelFormats.Gray8, null, displayBuffer, (currCols * PixelFormats.Gray8.BitsPerPixel + 7) / 8); System.Console.WriteLine("Got to change " + i.ToString()); System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(100); } //should get here. If not, then theMaxChange is too large. //Now, go back up the undo stack. for (i = theMaxChange - 1; i >= 0; i--) { displayBuffer = new byte[theList[i].Length]; theSource = BitmapSource.Create((theColumns - i), (theRows - i), 96, 96, PixelFormats.Gray8, null, displayBuffer, ((theColumns - i) * PixelFormats.Gray8.BitsPerPixel + 7) / 8); System.Console.WriteLine("Got to undo change " + i.ToString()); System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(100); } } } Now, if I'm explicit in calling the garbage collector, I have to wrap the entire code in an outer loop to cause the OOM crash. For me, this tends to happen around x = 50 or so: public partial class Window1 : Window { public Window1() { InitializeComponent(); //Attempts to create an OOM crash //to do so, mimic minute croppings of an 'image' (ushort array), and then undoing the crops for (int x = 0; x < 1000; x++){ int theRows = 4000, currRows; int theColumns = 4000, currCols; int theMaxChange = 30; int i; List<ushort[]> theList = new List<ushort[]>();//the list of images in the undo/redo stack byte[] displayBuffer = null;//the buffer used as a bitmap source BitmapSource theSource = null; for (i = 0; i < theMaxChange; i++) { currRows = theRows - i; currCols = theColumns - i; theList.Add(new ushort[(theRows - i) * (theColumns - i)]); displayBuffer = new byte[theList[i].Length]; theSource = BitmapSource.Create(currCols, currRows, 96, 96, PixelFormats.Gray8, null, displayBuffer, (currCols * PixelFormats.Gray8.BitsPerPixel + 7) / 8); } //should get here. If not, then theMaxChange is too large. //Now, go back up the undo stack. for (i = theMaxChange - 1; i >= 0; i--) { displayBuffer = new byte[theList[i].Length]; theSource = BitmapSource.Create((theColumns - i), (theRows - i), 96, 96, PixelFormats.Gray8, null, displayBuffer, ((theColumns - i) * PixelFormats.Gray8.BitsPerPixel + 7) / 8); GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();//force gc to collect, because we're in scenario 2, lots of large random changes GC.Collect(); } System.Console.WriteLine("Got to changelist " + x.ToString()); System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(100); } } } If I'm mishandling memory in either scenario, if there's something I should spot with a profiler, let me know. That's a pretty simple routine there. Unfortunately, it looks like @Kevin's answer is right-- this is a bug in .NET and how .NET handles objects larger than 85k. This situation strikes me as exceedingly strange; could Powerpoint be rewritten in .NET with this kind of limitation, or any of the other Office suite applications? 85k does not seem to me to be a whole lot of space, and I'd also think that any program that uses so-called 'large' allocations frequently would become unstable within a matter of days to weeks when using .NET. EDIT: It looks like Kevin is right, this is a limitation of .NET's GC. For those who don't want to follow the entire thread, .NET has four GC heaps: gen0, gen1, gen2, and LOH (Large Object Heap). Everything that's 85k or smaller goes on one of the first three heaps, depending on creation time (moved from gen0 to gen1 to gen2, etc). Objects larger than 85k get placed on the LOH. The LOH is never compacted, so eventually, allocations of the type I'm doing will eventually cause an OOM error as objects get scattered about that memory space. We've found that moving to .NET 4.0 does help the problem somewhat, delaying the exception, but not preventing it. To be honest, this feels a bit like the 640k barrier-- 85k ought to be enough for any user application (to paraphrase this video of a discussion of the GC in .NET). For the record, Java does not exhibit this behavior with its GC.

    Read the article

  • Transpose a Collection

    - by Joseph Melettukunnel
    Hello, I've a list of different sizes of a T-Shirt, e.g. S, M, L. Since this might change for T-Shirts (sometimes we just have e.g. M, L), we load this into a List sizes. Since most DataGrids (xamDataGrid, WPF Toolkit DataGrid) need Properties for binding to the Columns, I'd like to transpose somehow my data. Does anyone have an idea how to do this? E.g. Instead of having List where Size { string sizeName, int available, int defect, int ordered} Avail. Defect Ordered [S] 1 2 3 [M] 1 2 3 [L] 1 2 3 I want an Object which has the Properties S, M, L containing the Values like this: [S] [M] [L] Avail. 1 2 3 Defect 1 2 3 Ordered 1 2 3 The problem here is that I don't know how many sizes will be available for the tshirt, it might be 3, 4, or 10. Thanks for any help Cheers PS: Here is a mockup of how the final grid should look like http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/9161/multirowspangridfixedel.png

    Read the article

  • How to measure sum of collected memory of Young Generation?

    - by Marcel
    Hi, I'd like to measure memory allocation data from my java application, i.e. the sum of the size of all objects that were allocated. Since object allocation is done in young generation this seems to be the right place. I know jconsole and I know the JMX beans but I just can't find the right variable... Right at the moment we are parsing the gc log output file but that's quite hard. Ideally we'd like to measure it via JMX... How can I get this value? Thanks, Marcel

    Read the article

  • C# - Accesing to items for a collection inherited from List<string>

    - by Salvador
    I am trying to implement a new class inherited from List<string>, to load the contents from a text file to the items. using System.Collections.Generic; using System.IO; using System.Linq; public class ListExt: List<string> { string baseDirectory; public LoadFromFile(string FileName) { this._items = File.ReadAllLines(FileName).ToList();//does not work because _list is private } } but i dont knew how to load the lines into the _items property because is private. any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • What does "render @collection" do?

    - by ryeguy
    I'm trying to learn Rails better by looking at example applications, and while looking at this line of the source of railscasts.com, I noticed it does this: <div class="episodes"> <%= render @episodes %> </div> What exactly is going on here? Why isn't this documented on the render function? Or is it?

    Read the article

  • Where unmanaged resources are allocated.

    - by Harsha
    Hello all, I am not a comp science guy. Managed resources are allocated on the heap. But I would like to know where unmanaged resources are allocated. If unmanaged resources are also allocated on the heap, is it the same heap used by managed resources or a different one? Thanks in advance. Harsha

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96  | Next Page >