Search Results

Search found 950 results on 38 pages for 'floating'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 9/38 | < Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >

  • Floating not right in ie ?

    - by Tom
    Hi, i want to do like the following format: So this is what i did : <style> .toptitle{ font-size:14px; } .toprating{ background:yellow; float:left; font-size:12px; } .topcontainer{ border-bottom:1px #CCCCCC solid; } </style> <div class="topcontainer"> <div class="toprating">256</div> <div class="toptitle">Lorem Ipsum...</div> </div> <br> <div class="topcontainer"> <div class="toprating">256</div> <div class="toptitle">Lorem Ipsum...</div> </div> Now, in firefox,chrome,safari, this works perfectly, but in IE the title goes about 30 px down. Is there a mistake in the code, or is there any better code to do this?

    Read the article

  • Why are there so many floats in the Android API?

    - by Brian
    The default floating point type in Java is the double. If you hard code a constant like 2.5 into your program, Java makes it a double automatically. When you do an operation on floats or ints that could potentially benefit from more precision, the type is 'promoted' to a double. But in the Android API, everything seems to be a float from sound volumes to rectangle coordinates. There's a structure called RectF used in most drawing; the F is for float. It's really a pain for programmers who are casting promoted doubles back to (float) pretty often. Don't we all agree that Java code is messy and verbose enough as it is? Usually math coprocessors and accelerators prefer double in Java because it corresponds to one of the internal types. Is there something about Android's Dalvik VM that prefers floats for some reason? Or are all the floats just a result of perversion in API design?

    Read the article

  • Problem with floating divs in IE8

    - by hivehicks
    I want to make two block stand side by side. In Opera, Chrome and Firefox I get the expected result with the code I use. But IE8 refuses to display it correctly. Here's IE8 screenshot: http://ipicture.ru/upload/100405/RCFnQI7yZo.png And Chrome screenshot (how it should look like): http://ipicture.ru/upload/100405/4x95HC33zK.png Here's my HTML: <div id="balance-container"> <div id="balance-info-container"> <p class="big" style="margin-bottom: 5px;"> <strong> <span style="color: #56666F;">??????:</span> <span style="color: #E12122;">-2312 ???</span> </strong> </p> <p class="small minor"><strong>????????? 1000 ???. ?? 1.05.10</strong></p> </div> <div id="balance-button-container"> <button id="pay-button" class="green-button">????????? ????</button> </div> </div> And CSS: #balance-container { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width: 390px; } #balance-info-container, #balance-button-container { float: left; } #balance-info-container { width: 250px; }

    Read the article

  • Absolute position and floating

    - by Ruth Rettigo
    Hi, Do you have any idea, how to style this layout without specifing exact height for "Element 1"? Code Element1 { positon: relative; width: 100%; height: auto; /* I don't want to specify exact height */ } Inner1 { position: absolute; top: xyz px; left: xyz px; } Inner2 { position: absolute; top: xyz px; left: xyz px; } Element2 { float: left; width: 100%; } Example +--------------------------------------------------+ |Element1 | | +--------+ | | +--------+ |Inner2 | | | |Inner1 | +--------+ | | +--------+ | | | | | +--------------------------------------------------+ +--------------------------------------------------+ |Element2 | | | | | +--------------------------------------------------+

    Read the article

  • Loss of precision - int -> float or double

    - by stan
    I have an exam question i am revising for and the question is for 4 marks "In java we can assign a int to a double or a float". Will this ever loose infromation and why? I have put that because ints are normally of fixed length or size - the precision for sotring data is finite, where storing information in floating point can be infinite, essentially we loose infromation because of this Now i am a little sketchy as to whetehr or not i am hitting the right areas here. I very sure it will loose precision but i cant exactly put my finger on why. Can i getsome help please Thanks

    Read the article

  • Clearing block affects wrong floating

    - by HiveHicks
    I've got two-column layout <div class="left-pane"> Left pane </div> <div class="central-pane"> <div> <ul class="customers-types-tabs"> <li>item 1</li> <li>item 2</li> <li>item 3</li> </ul> </div> <div>Main content</div> </div> and the stylesheet: .left-pane { width: 248px; float: left; background-color: #f6f6f6; border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; padding: 20px 5px; } .central-pane { margin-left: 270px; } .customers-types-tabs li { background-color: #f6f6f6; border: 1px solid #d5d5d5; line-height: 38px; padding: 0 20px; float: left; margin-right: 10px; position: relative; top: 1px; } The problem is that I want "Main content" to appear right below the div with ul inside it (that represents tabs control), but if I set Main content's div's style to clear: both, it appears below the left pane, which is taller than the ul. What should I do to get correct position of main content?

    Read the article

  • floating in list causes trouble in IE6 and IE7

    - by Thom
    I have a toggle list that causes trouble in old IE browsers, tried to fix it for couple of hours but I failed again and again. Please check out the jsfiddle code: http://jsfiddle.net/vny63/ structure is similar to this: <li class="toggle"> <a class="left" title="gallery">gallery</a> (English) <span class="right float_right">3</span> <ul style="display: none;"> <li class="space_left"> lot of stuff here </li> </ul> </li> It is working well in IE8 and Firefox3

    Read the article

  • floating a div with jquery/offset - ignores href hashtag

    - by Kevin Crawley
    <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var top = $('#rt_outer').offset().top - parseFloat($('#rt_outer').css('marginTop').replace(/auto/, 0)); $(window).scroll(function (event) { // what the y position of the scroll is var y = $(this).scrollTop(); // whether that's below the form if (y >= top) { // if so, ad the fixed class $('#rt_outer').addClass('fixed'); } else { // otherwise remove it $('#rt_outer').removeClass('fixed'); } }); }); </script> The problem is fairly straight forward. If I use a header redirect to a new location in the page (say half way down, I jump to #halfway after processing a php script using header("somepage.php#halfway") the div container which is handled by this script won't jump down until the page is scrolled in either direction. I know there is a solution to this, I just don't know what.

    Read the article

  • jquery offset incorrect on floating elements

    - by LordZardeck
    I have a bunch of images each with the float: left property applied to them. They are constrained withing a 400px width area, forcing them into a grid of 4 X 4. If i try to get the position of them, they are always incorrect. What is causing this? You can see what I'm trying to do here: http://dev.redemptionconnect.com/cards/browse. Click one of the images to see what I mean. the dialog that pops up should be over the image you clicked.

    Read the article

  • Neo4j+Gremlin : Trouble with T.gte and floating point node attributes

    - by letronje
    For a type of nodes in my graph, attribute values for an attribute(named 'some_count') is either missing or an integer or a float. I'm trying to write gremlin to filter these nodes based on minimum value for this attribute. I first verified that the values are indeed present by firing the following gremlin g.v(XXX)._().in('category').hasNot('some_count', T.eq, null).back(1).some_count Next, I tried filtering by exact value and that works and show me the matching nodes or gives an empty array if there is no match g.v(XXX)._().in('category').hasNot('some_count', T.eq, null).back(1).has('some_count', T.eq, 120000.0d) But the following query that uses the 'greater than or equal to' comparator doesn't work. g.v(XXX)._().in('category').hasNot('some_count', T.eq, null).back(1).has('some_count', T.gte, 1.0d) this returns nil (I'm querying via ruby/rails using Neo4j AR Adapter ) Instead of returning an empty array for no match, it returns a nil, which tells me something could be wrong with the query itself. I'm running neo4j community server 1.8. Is there a way I can ask Neo4j to log errors/queries, to see what could be going wrong ?

    Read the article

  • Floating an inline element to the right of a div

    - by Rajat
    I want to right-align an inline element to the right of a div. I have seen float="right" applied on a span to right align it but it seems semantically incorrect to me as floats are supposed to move "boxes" or block elements to the right or left of a container element. Is my understanding of Float wrong or is there another way of right-aligning inline elements in a container DIV.

    Read the article

  • What's a good way to add a large number of small floats together?

    - by splicer
    Say you have 100000000 32-bit floating point values in an array, and each of these floats has a value between 0.0 and 1.0. If you tried to sum them all up like this result = 0.0; for (i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) { result += array[i]; } you'd run into problems as result gets much larger than 1.0. So what are some of the ways to more accurately perform the summation?

    Read the article

  • How can I add floats together in different orders, and always get the same total?

    - by splicer
    Let's say I have three 32-bit floating point values, a, b, and c, such that (a + b) + c != a + (b + c). Is there summation algorithm, perhaps similar to Kahan summation, that guarantees that these values can be summed in any order and always arrive at the exact same (fairly accurate) total? I'm looking for the general case (i.e. not a solution that only deals with 3 numbers). Is arbitrary precision arithmetic the only way to go? I'm dealing with very large data sets, so I'd like to avoid the overhead of using arbitrary precision arithmetic if possible. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • floating image wrapped by text in android

    - by nourdine
    hello I think the title says it all. I need to accomplish this result in android but it looks like there is no easy fix to my problem. Just to clarify a bit more: if I had to do it in html css I would write something like <img src="Image URL" style="float:left; margin-right: 5px;" /> got it? ;) thanks guyz

    Read the article

  • How many double numbers are there between 0.0 and 1.0?

    - by polygenelubricants
    This is something that's been on my mind for years, but I never took the time to ask before. Many (pseudo) random number generators generate a random number between 0.0 and 1.0. Mathematically there are infinite numbers in this range, but double is a floating point number, and therefore has a finite precision. So the questions are: Just how many double numbers are there between 0.0 and 1.0? Are there just as many numbers between 1 and 2? Between 100 and 101? Between 10^100 and 10^100+1? Note: if it makes a difference, I'm interested in Java's definition of double in particular.

    Read the article

  • "text-overflow: ellipsis" not working well in firefox with floating element around

    - by Freedom
    see jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/9v8faLeh/1/ I have two elements .text and .badge in a .container with a limit width: <div class="container"> <span class="badge">(*)</span> <span class="text">this is a long long long long text.</span> </div> the .badge element may not exist in a .container according to the data. if a .badge exist, I want the .badge element to float to right. and if the .text is too long, the text should ellipsis. .container { width: 150px; border: 1px solid; padding: 5px; white-space: nowrap; text-overflow: ellipsis; overflow: hidden; } .badge { float: right; margin-left: 5px; } if you open the jsfiddle link in Chrome or IE, it displays correctly as my expectation. but if open in Firefox, the .text and .badge are overlay if the text is so long. I don't want to use any JavaScript. how can I achieve the same result in FireFox?

    Read the article

  • Next Div Does not appear correctly after floating two divs to right and left

    - by user3703669
    I have floated two divs to left and right...But the next div after those two divs does not appear correctly... My code is follows #Div1{ position: relative; float: left; } #Div2{ position: relative; float: right; } And the display as follows <div id="Div1">This is aligned to left on the same x axis</div> <div id="Div2">This is aligned to right on the same x axis</div> <div style="color: red;">After the alignment this div does not align</div> The output is as follows http://i.stack.imgur.com/8A6hz.png But I expect something like this http://i.stack.imgur.com/wVGN6.png Anyway to accomplish this task ?? Please HELP!! Urgent help needed!!!

    Read the article

  • Please help me get my content div to get an auto height from absolutely positioned element

    - by Justin Hollender
    I need some help with a CSS layout. It is set up like this: +--------------------+ | | | header | |-| |--------------| | |nav| content | | | | | | | | | | | | | | footer | +--------------------+ So, the nav is supposed to be floating above all the main page content. That's why I have it set to be absolutely positioned. The issue is that the nav items are dynamic, without a set height. Right now, the nav expands past the content. How can I fix it so that the content will have an auto height based off the nav? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • floating point exception in C++ code !

    - by mekasperasky
    #include<stdio.h> #include<math.h> int main () { FILE *fp; fp=fopen("output","w"); float t,y=0,x=0,e=5,f=1,w=1; for (t=0;t<10;t=t+0.01) { if( y==inf && y== nan) break; fprintf(fp,"%lf\t%lf\n",y,x); y = y + ((e*(1 - x*x)*y) - x + f*cos(w*t))*t; x = x + y*t; } return (0); } why is the ouput giving infinite and NAN values?

    Read the article

  • python floating number

    - by zhack
    i am kind of confused why python add some additional decimal number in this case, please help to explain >>> mylist = ["list item 1", 2, 3.14] >>> print mylist ['list item 1', 2, 3.1400000000000001]

    Read the article

  • Floating toolbar on bottom, centered, 80% of current screen width

    - by Tom
    I'm trying to implement a Facebook like toolbar on the bottom of the screen for a website I'm currently working on. Currently, I have it 100% of the width of the screen but I'd like to have it look almost exactly like Facebook's toolbar, centered, bottom justified on top, around 80% of the current screen's width. Here is the current CSS for the toolbar I have that is 100% of the screen's width. Thanks in advance. CSS: <style type="text/css"> #toolbar { background:url('/_assets/img/toolbar.gif') repeat-x; height:25px; position:fixed; bottom:0px; width:100%; left:0px; border-left:1px solid #000000; border-right:1px solid #000000; z-index:100; font-size:0.8em; } </style>

    Read the article

  • CSS: Why is my floated <span> being displayed below an <a>nchor in IE6/7 but not IE8/FF

    - by gsquare567
    i'm getting this weird CSS bug in ie6/7 (but not in ie8 or firefox): for some reason, my nchor and , two inline elements, which are on the same line, are being displayed on different lines. the span is floating to the right, too! heres the HTML: <div class="sidebartextbg"><a href="journey.php" style="width:50%" title="Track past, present and future milestones during your employment">Journey</a> <span class="notificationNumber">2</span> <!-- JOURNEY COUNT: end --> </div> and here's the CSS: .sidebartextbg { background:url("../images/sidebartextbg.gif") repeat-x scroll 0 0 transparent; border-bottom:1px solid #A3A88B; font-size:14px; line-height:18px; margin:0 auto; padding:5px 9px; width:270px; } .notificationNumber { background:url("../images/oval_edges.gif") no-repeat scroll 0 0 transparent; color:#FFFFFF; float:right; padding:0 7px; position:relative; text-align:center; width:17px; } so: why would the floated span be displayed on the line under the nchor? thanks!

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >