Search Results

Search found 1249 results on 50 pages for 'iptables'.

Page 9/50 | < Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >

• iptables to allow 80 and 443 on chillispot running ddwrt

  - by user76682

  I am having problems setting this up. this is what I am trying to do. I have Chillispot (hotpsot) running on dd-wrt. Everything is setup, but the client wants only 80 and 443 to go through through the hotspot. I found this tutorial for dd-wrt but that doesnt seem to work. http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Iptables#Allow_HTTP_traffic_only_to_specific_domain.28s.29 Initially I tried to place the options at the top but didnt work. then i flushed the iptables and set only these three. I can see the pkts number grow but for some reason I can browse. root@DD-WRT:~# iptables -nvL FORWARD Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 3105 packets, 2442K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 1629 230K ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 multiport dports 21,80,443 2346 2792K ACCEPT 0 -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED 328 46420 DROP 0 -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Heres some info from the router, chillispot is the tun0 interface. root@DD-WRT:~# iptables -vnL FORWARD --line-numbers Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes) num pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 1 0 0 ACCEPT 47 -- * vlan1 192.168.8.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 2 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * vlan1 192.168.8.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:1723 3 32 1851 ACCEPT 0 -- tun0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW 4 0 0 ACCEPT 0 -- br0 br0 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 5 48 2408 TCPMSS tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x06/0x02 TCPMSS clamp to PMTU 6 756 452K lan2wan 0 -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 7 756 452K ACCEPT 0 -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED 8 0 0 TRIGGER 0 -- vlan1 br0 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 TRIGGER type:in match:0 relate:0 9 0 0 trigger_out 0 -- br0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 10 0 0 ACCEPT 0 -- br0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW 11 0 0 DROP 0 -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 12 0 0 DROP 0 -- br0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 13 0 0 DROP 0 -- * br0 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 The interfaces: root@DD-WRT:~# ifconfig -a br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:12:17:CF:80:5F inet addr:192.168.8.1 Bcast:192.168.8.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2371 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1862 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:259721 (253.6 KiB) TX bytes:254862 (248.8 KiB) br0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:12:17:CF:80:5F inet addr:169.254.255.1 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:12:17:CF:80:5F UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:5050 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:2508 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:1066410 (1.0 MiB) TX bytes:376001 (367.1 KiB) Interrupt:5 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:12:17:CF:80:61 UP BROADCAST RUNNING ALLMULTI MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:729 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:114693 TX packets:697 errors:2 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:107869 (105.3 KiB) TX bytes:473134 (462.0 KiB) Interrupt:4 Base address:0x1000 etherip0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 1E:13:B7:09:CC:8C BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:18 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:18 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:1210 (1.1 KiB) TX bytes:1210 (1.1 KiB) teql0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) tun0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 inet addr:192.168.182.1 P-t-P:192.168.182.1 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:662 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:587 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:10 RX bytes:92167 (90.0 KiB) TX bytes:427657 (417.6 KiB) vlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:12:17:CF:80:5F UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2371 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1864 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:269558 (263.2 KiB) TX bytes:262680 (256.5 KiB) vlan1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:12:17:CF:80:60 inet addr:10.3.2.47 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2675 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:645 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:705429 (688.8 KiB) TX bytes:102197 (99.8 KiB) The routing table: root@DD-WRT:~# netstat -nr Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 192.168.182.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 tun0 10.3.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 vlan1 192.168.8.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 br0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 br0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 10.3.2.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 vlan1 Highly appreciate your help. TIA, Arun

  Read the article

• Server with 3 public IP and iptables

  - by Juan

  I have a linux box with two NIC cards: eth0 and eth1. In one card i have 3 public IP: eth0 = 10.10.10.1, eth0:1= 10.10.10.2 and eth0:2= 10.10.10.3 In the other card i have one local IP eth1 = 192.9.200.1 I want to redirect all the wan traffic for 10.10.10.2 to the LAN 192.9.200.2 and the same for 10.10.10.3 to 192.9.200.3 I have tried with this rule but doesn't work iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 10.10.10.2 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.9.200.2 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -d 10.10.10.3 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.9.200.3 IP forward is enabled in /etc/sysctl.conf Can you help me, please.

  Read the article

• xinet vs iptables for port forwarding performance

  - by jamie.mccrindle

  I have a requirement to run a Java based web server on port 80. The options are: Web proxy (apache, nginx etc.) xinet iptables setuid The baseline would be running the app using setuid but I'd prefer not to for security reasons. Apache is too slow and nginx doesn't support keep-alives so new connections are made for every proxied request. xinet is easy to set up but creates a new process for every request which I've seen cause problems in a high performance environment. The last option is port forwarding with iptables but I have no experience of how fast it is. Of course, the ideal solution would be to do this on a dedicated hardware firewall / load balancer but that's not an option at present.

  Read the article

• iptables dos limit for all ports

  - by user973917

  I know how to use limit conntrack option to allow for DoS protection. However, I want to add a protection to limit no more than say 50 connections for each port. How can I do this? Basically, I want to make sure that each port can have no more than 50 connections, rather than globally applying 50 connections (which is what #2 does I believe?) Would I do something like: iptables -A INPUT --dport 1:65535 -m limit --limit 50/minute --limit-burst 50 -j ACCEPT or iptables -A INPUT -m limit --limit 50/minute --limit-burst 50 -j ACCEPT

  Read the article

• iptables: matching multiple ip addresses

  - by Tax

  Hi guys, I am working on a iptables rule to apply after my shorewall script has initialized my firewall. I want a spicific IP (10.0.1.19) address in my lan to be redirected to 10.0.64.1 except if it is going to paypal. I have the following rule, and that works like a charm iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING ! -d 1.2.3.4 -s 10.0.1.19 -j DNAT --to 10.0.64.1 My problem is that paypal uses multiple ip addresses, and I am not allowed to have multiple IP-addresses. https://ppmts.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/ppdts.cfg/php/enduser/std%5Fadp.php?p%5Ffaqid=92 On top of this problem I would like to know how to remove the rule again, without having to restart shorewall. Kind regards Tax

  Read the article

• iptables rules for botnet (UDP flood) protection

  - by Petar Simeonov

  I'm currently experiencing a massive UDP attack on my server. I host a couple of gameservers, mainly Tf2, CS:GO, CS 1.6 and CS:Source, and my 1.6 server is being flooded. I tried different rules in iptables, but none of them seemed to work. I'm on a 100mbps bandwidth tariff, but the flood i receive is 500+mbps. This is the log of the latest tcpdump - http://pastebin.com/HSgFVeBs Packet length varies throughout the day. Only my gameserver ports are being flooded - 27015, 27016, 27018 via UDP packets. Are there any iptables rules, that might prevent this?

  Read the article

• How can private IPV4 addresses get past iptables NAT (tcp RST,FIN)

  - by gscott

  I've got a router performing simple NAT translation using iptables iptables -t nat -o -j MASQUERADE This works fine almost all of the time except for one particular case where some TCP RST and FIN packets are leaving the router un-NAT'd. In this scenario I setup 1 or 2 client computers streaming Flash video (eg www.nasa.gov/ntv) At the router I then tear down and re-establish the public interface (which is a modem) As expected the Flash streams stall out. After the connection is re-established and I try to refresh the Flash pages, I see some TCP RST and [FIN,ACK] packets leaving the public interface (I assume as Flash attempts to recover its stream). I don't know how these packets can leave the router non-NAT'd

  Read the article

• Forwarding RDP via a Linux machine using iptables: Not working

  - by Nimmy Lebby

  I have a Linux machine and a Windows machine behind a router that implements NAT (the diagram might be overkill, but was fun to make): I am forwarding RDP port (3389) on the router to the Linux machine because I want to audit RDP connections. For the Linux machine to forward RDP traffic, I wrote these iptables rules: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 3389 -j DNAT --to-destination win-box iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport 3389 -j ACCEPT The port is listening on the Windows machine: C:\Users\nimmy>netstat -a Active Connections Proto Local Address Foreign Address State (..snip..) TCP 0.0.0.0:3389 WIN-BOX:0 LISTENING (..snip..) And the port is forwarding on the Linux machine: # tcpdump port 3389 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes 01:33:11.451663 IP shieldsup.grc.com.56387 > linux-box.myapt.lan.ms-wbt-server: Flags [S], seq 94663035, win 8192, options [mss 1460], length 0 01:33:11.451846 IP shieldsup.grc.com.56387 > win-box.myapt.lan.ms-wbt-server: Flags [S], seq 94663035, win 8192, options [mss 1460], length 0 However, I am not getting any successful RDP connections from the outside. The port is not even responding: C:\Users\outside-nimmy>telnet example.com 3389 Connecting To example.com...Could not open connection to the host, on port 3389: Connect failed Any ideas? Update Per @Zhiqiang Ma, I looked at nf_conntrack proc file during a connection attempt and this is what I see (192.168.3.1 = linux-box, 192.168.3.5 = win-box): # cat /proc/net/nf_conntrack | grep 3389 ipv4 2 tcp 6 118 SYN_SENT src=4.79.142.206 dst=192.168.3.1 sport=43142 dport=3389 packets=6 bytes=264 [UNREPLIED] src=192.168.3.5 dst=4.79.142.206 sport=3389 dport=43142 packets=0 bytes=0 mark=0 secmark=0 zone=0 use=2 2nd update Got tcpdump on the router and it seems that win-box is sending an RST packet: 21:20:24.767792 IP shieldsup.grc.com.45349 > linux-box.myapt.lan.3389: S 19088743:19088743(0) win 8192 <mss 1460> 21:20:24.768038 IP shieldsup.grc.com.45349 > win-box.myapt.lan.3389: S 19088743:19088743(0) win 8192 <mss 1460> 21:20:24.770674 IP win-box.myapt.lan.3389 > shieldsup.grc.com.45349: R 721745706:721745706(0) ack 755785049 win 0 Why would Windows be doing this?

  Read the article

• Iptables massive 1:1 NAT

  - by TiFFolk

  I have to connect two LANs: LAN1: 10.10.0.0/16 and LAN2: 192.168.0.0/16. I can't do simple routing, because 192.168.0.0/16 net is prohibited in LAN1, so I am thinking of using Full cone nat (1:1) to translate 192.168.x.y/16 to 10.11.x.y/16. Each translation is done by this rules: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 10.11.0.0/16 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.0.0/16 iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/16 -j SNAT --to-source 10.11.0.0/16 But I will have to enter 254*254*2 rules, what will, I think, result in enormous performance degradation. So, is there a way to write such one-to-one translation with minimum number of rules?

  Read the article

• IPTables masquerading with one NIC

  - by Tuinslak

  Hi, I am running an OpenVPN server with only one NIC. This is my current layout: public.ip > Cisco firewall > lan.ip > OpenVPN server lan.ip = 192.168.22.70 The Cisco firewall forwards the requests to the oVPN server, thus so far everything works and clients are able to connect. However, all clients connected should be able to access 3 networks: lan1: 192.168.200.0 (vpn lan) > tun0 lan2: 192.168.110.0 (office lan) > eth1 (gw 192.168.22.1) lan3: 192.168.22.0 (server lan) > eth1 (broadcast network) So tun0 is mapped to eth1. Iptables output: # iptables-save # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.2 on Wed Feb 16 14:14:20 2011 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [327:26098] :FORWARD DROP [305:31700] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [291:27378] -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i tun0 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i ! tun0 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A INPUT -i ! tun0 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable -A FORWARD -d 192.168.200.0/24 -i tun0 -j DROP -A FORWARD -s 192.168.200.0/24 -i tun0 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -d 192.168.200.0/24 -i eth1 -j ACCEPT COMMIT # Completed on Wed Feb 16 14:14:20 2011 # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.2 on Wed Feb 16 14:14:20 2011 *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [302:26000] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [3:377] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [49:3885] -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE COMMIT # Completed on Wed Feb 16 14:14:20 2011 Yet, clients are unable to ping any ip (including 192.168.200.1, which is the oVPN's IP) When the machine was directly connected to the internet, with 2 NICs, it was quite simply solved with masquerading and adding static routes in the oVPN client's config. However, as masquerading won't accept virtual interfaces (eth0:0, etc) I am unable to get masquerading to work again (and I'm not even sure whether I need virtual interfaces). Thanks. Edit: OpenVPN server: # ifconfig eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr ba:e6:64:ec:57:ac inet addr:192.168.22.70 Bcast:192.168.22.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::b8e6:64ff:feec:57ac/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:6857 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:4044 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:584046 (570.3 KiB) TX bytes:473691 (462.5 KiB) Interrupt:14 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:334 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:334 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:33773 (32.9 KiB) TX bytes:33773 (32.9 KiB) tun0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 inet addr:192.168.200.1 P-t-P:192.168.200.2 Mask:255.255.255.255 UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) ifconfig on a client: # ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:22:64:71:11:56 inet addr:192.168.110.94 Bcast:192.168.110.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::222:64ff:fe71:1156/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:3466 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1838 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:997924 (974.5 KiB) TX bytes:332406 (324.6 KiB) Interrupt:17 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:37847 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:37847 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:2922444 (2.7 MiB) TX bytes:2922444 (2.7 MiB) tun0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 inet addr:192.168.200.30 P-t-P:192.168.200.29 Mask:255.255.255.255 UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:689 errors:0 dropped:18 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:468778 (457.7 KiB) wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:ea:db:ae:86 UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:704699 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:730176 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:520385963 (496.2 MiB) TX bytes:225210422 (214.7 MiB) static routes line at the end of the client's config (I've been playing around with the 192.168.200.0 -- (un)commenting to see if anything changes): route 192.168.200.0 255.255.255.0 route 192.168.110.0 255.255.255.0 route 192.168.22.0 255.255.255.0 route on a vpn client: # route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.200.29 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun0 192.168.22.0 192.168.200.29 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0 192.168.200.0 192.168.200.29 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0 192.168.110.0 192.168.200.29 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0 192.168.110.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 192.168.110.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 edit: Weirdly enough, if I set push "redirect-gateway def1" in the server config, (and thus routes all traffic through VPN, which is not what I want), it seems to work.

  Read the article

• SSH Socks Proxy wiith iptables REDIRECT

  - by Radium

  I have googled and haven`t found the answer on my question. Help me please. There are two servers: serverA with public IP 12.0.0.10 and an private IP 10.0.0.5 serverB with public IP 20.0.0.11 I have setup SOCKS proxy on serverB to serverA: ssh -D20.0.0.11:2222 [email protected] So when on my local machine in a browser i specify SOCKS proxy 20.0.0.11:2222 (serverB:2222) as external IP while browsing i get 12.0.0.10 (serverA IP). That is ok. As well if i go onto http://10.0.0.5 (serverA private IP) it is also reachable. That is what i need. I want to make servers A private IP to be available through servers B public IP on certain ports but without specifying SOCKS in my browser. I could use ssh port forward but the problem is - i need to forward many ports and do not know which exactly - i know only the range. So when i connect to 20.0.0.11 to any port , for example, from 3000:4000 range, i want that traffic to be redirected to 10.0.0.5 on the same port. That is why i`ve decided maybe SOCKS proxy via SSH and iptables REDIRECT could help me. Client - serverBPublicIP (any port from range 3000:4000) - serverAPublicIP - serverAPrivateIP (the port was requested on serverBPublicIP) On serverB i do: ssh -D20.0.0.11:2222 [email protected] iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 20.0.0.11 -p tcp --dport 3000:4000 -j REDIRECT --to-port 2222 But that does not work - when i telnet on 20.0.0.11:3001 for example i do not see any proxied traffic on the serverA. What should i do else? I have tried tcpsocks like this (in example i am telneting to 20.0.0.11:3001) Client -> 20.0.0.11:3001 -> iptables REDIRECT from 3001 --to-port 1111 -> tcpsocks from 1111 to 2222 -> SOCKS proxy from serverB to serverA on port 2222 -> serverA But i do not know what to do with the traffic on serverA. How to route it to its private IP. Help me please. I know, VPN removes all the hell i am trying to create, but i have no ability to use tun/tap device. It is disabled.

  Read the article

• iptables NAT configuration

  - by Sarp Kaya

  Hello I am experiencing some issues with my iptables. Here's what I want to do: A(eth0)--------(eth0)B(eth2)---------------(eth2)C Brackets are interface names A,B and C are hosts. Now I would like to forward port number 80 of host C so that It would be accessed via host A. host A is 192.168.1.254 host C is 192.168.3.2 I intentionally ACCEPTed all FILTER chain options as the default policy because I wanted to make sure that NAT is working properly first. I enabled ip_forward. So here's what I have done: sudo iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp - d 192.168.1.254 -j DNAT --to 192.168.3.2 However it is not working. What am I missing here?

  Read the article

• IPTables reroute traffic not working

  - by user1307079

  I am trying to reroute incoming traffic on my server's port 80 to another server, but it is not working. This is what I tried. On the host server, I ran these: echo “1? > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to-destination 38.105.20.226:80 iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE The server I want it to redirect to is 38.105.20.226:80, but when I go to the webserver that is on the main server, instead of showing the content of the web server on 38.105.20.226:80, it just doesn't load. I am on CentOS.

  Read the article

• How to create an Iptables rule using domain name

  - by Supratik

  Hi, Can anyone please suggest a way to use domain name in Iptables rules. Regards Supratik

  Read the article

• xinet vs iptables for port forwarding performance

  - by jamie.mccrindle

  I have a requirement to run a Java based web server on port 80. The options are: Web proxy (apache, nginx etc.) xinet iptables setuid The baseline would be running the app using setuid but I'd prefer not to for security reasons. Apache is too slow and nginx doesn't support keep-alives so new connections are made for every proxied request. xinet is easy to set up but creates a new process for every request which I've seen cause problems in a high performance environment. The last option is port forwarding with iptables but I have no experience of how fast it is. Of course, the ideal solution would be to do this on a dedicated hardware firewall / load balancer but that's not an option at present.

  Read the article

• Retrieve malicious IP addresses from Apache logs and block them with iptables

  - by Gabriel Talavera

  Im trying to keep away some attackers that try to exploit XSS vulnerabilities from my website, I have found that most of the malicious attempts start with a classic "alert(document.cookie);\" test. The site is not vulnerable to XSS but I want to block the offending IP addresses before they found a real vulnerability, also, to keep the logs clean. My first thought is to have a script constantly checking in the Apache logs all IP addresses that start with that probe and send those addresses to an iptables drop rule. With something like this: cat /var/log/httpd/-access_log | grep "alert(document.cookie);" | awk '{print $1}' | uniq Why would be an effective way to send the output of that command to iptables? Thanks in advance for any input!

  Read the article

• Configure iptables with a bridge and static IPs

  - by Andrew Koester

  I have my server set up with several public IP addresses, with a network configuration as follows (with example IPs): eth0 \- br0 - 1.1.1.2 |- [VM 1's eth0] | |- 1.1.1.3 | \- 1.1.1.4 \- [VM 2's eth0] \- 1.1.1.5 My question is, how do I set up iptables with different rules for the actual physical server as well as the VMs? I don't mind having the VMs doing their own iptables, but I'd like br0 to have a different set of rules. Right now I can only let everything through, which is not the desired behavior (as br0 is exposed). Thanks!

  Read the article

• IP-restricted port forwarding with iptables

  - by Tom

  For an example, I have two authorized client computers, 1.1.1.1 and 2.1.1.1. My server running iptables is 3.1.1.1 and my firewalled web server is 4.1.1.1. When one of the authorized client IPs connects to 3.1.1.1 on port 80, I would like the connection to be forwarded to 4.1.1.1 on port 8888. If any other IP attempts to connect I would like it to refuse/drop the connection. What iptables config would accomplish this? Is there something more specific out there that would be better suited for this job?

  Read the article

• Iptables remote port forwarding and dynamic remote ip

  - by lbwtz2

  Hello, I want to forward a port from my remote vps to my domestic server and I am quite a newbie with iptables. The problem is that I am using a dynamic dns service to reach my home server from the internet so I don't have a fixed ip and iptables doesn't like urls. The rules I am willing to use are these: -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth0 -d xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx --dport 8888 -j DNAT --to myhome.tld:80 -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth0 -d myhome.tld --dport 80 -j ACCEPT Of course I recevie a Error BAD IP ADDRESS because of myhome.tld. What can I do?

  Read the article

• CentOS 6 - iptables preventing web access via port 80

  - by bsod99

  I'm setting up a new web server with CentOS 6.2 and am not able to connect via the web. Everything looks set up correctly in httpd.conf and Apache is running, so I'm assuming it's an iptables issue. Is there anything in the following which could be causing the issue? # iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere state NEW tcp dpt:ssh REJECT all -- anywhere anywhere reject-with icmp-host-prohibited ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:http Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination REJECT all -- anywhere anywhere reject-with icmp-host-prohibited Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)

  Read the article

• Accessing mySQL from two ports: Problems with iptables

  - by marekventur

  Hi! I'm trying to make my mySQL-server (running on Ubuntu) listen on port 3306 and 110, because I would like to access it from a network with very few open ports. So far I've found this answer telling me to do iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 110 -j REDIRECT --to-port 3306 but all I got is: # mysql -h mydomain.com -P 3306 -u username --password=xyz Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. Your MySQL connection id is 68863 Server version: 5.0.75-0ubuntu10.5 (Ubuntu) Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the buffer. mysql> exit Bye # mysql -h mydomain.com -P 110 -u username --password=xyz ERROR 2003 (HY000): Can't connect to MySQL server on 'mydomain.com' (111) I'm not an expert with iptables, so I not sure where to look for the problem. I'm googling around for quite some time, but haven't found anything to help me yet. This is what iptable tells me: # iptables -t nat -L -n -v Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 32M packets, 1674M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 0 0 REDIRECT tcp -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:110 redir ports 3306 Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 855K packets, 55M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 837K packets, 54M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination # iptables -L -n -v Chain INPUT (policy DROP 7 packets, 340 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 107K 5390K LOG all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID limit: avg 2/sec burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `INPUT INVALID ' 131K 6614K DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID 0 0 MY_DROP tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x3F/0x00 0 0 MY_DROP tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x03/0x03 0 0 MY_DROP tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x06/0x06 0 0 MY_DROP tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x05/0x05 0 0 MY_DROP tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x11/0x01 0 0 MY_DROP tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x18/0x08 0 0 MY_DROP tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x30/0x20 6948K 12G ACCEPT all -- lo * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 151M 34G ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED 32M 1666M ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:80 1833 106K ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:443 603 29392 ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:25 1 60 ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:465 24 1180 ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:110 1 60 ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:995 7919 400K ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:143 1 60 ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:993 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:119 1 60 ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:53 7 517 ACCEPT udp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW udp dpt:53 1110 65364 ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:21 139K 8313K ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:22 10176 499K ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:3306 2 80 ACCEPT udp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW udp dpt:123 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:6060 4 176 ACCEPT tcp -- venet0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:6667 20987 1179K MY_REJECT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 2159 284K LOG all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID limit: avg 2/sec burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `OUTPUT INVALID ' 2630 304K DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID 6948K 12G ACCEPT all -- * lo 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 181M 34G ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED 0 0 MY_REJECT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain MY_DROP (7 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 0 0 LOG all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 2/sec burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `PORTSCAN DROP ' 0 0 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain MY_REJECT (2 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 13806 652K LOG tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 2/sec burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `REJECT TCP ' 18171 830K REJECT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with tcp-reset 912 242K LOG udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 2/sec burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `REJECT UDP ' 912 242K REJECT udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-port-unreachable 1904 107K LOG icmp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 2/sec burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `DROP ICMP ' 1904 107K DROP icmp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 0 0 LOG all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 2/sec burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `REJECT OTHER ' 0 0 REJECT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-proto-unreachable Is there anyone who can give ma a hint where to look for the problem? Thank you!

  Read the article

• Install multiport module on iptables

  - by tarteauxfraises

  I'am trying to install "fail2ban" on Cubidebian, a Debian port for Cubieboard (A raspberry like board). The following rule failed due to "-m multiport --dports ssh" options (It works, when i run manually the command without multiple options). $ iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m multiport --dports ssh -j fail2ban-ssh" iptables: No chain/target/match by that name. When i make a cat on "/proc/net/ip_tables_matches", i see that multiport module is not loaded: $ cat /proc/net/ip_tables_matches u32 time string statistic state owner pkttype mac limit helper connmark mark ah icmp socket socket quota2 policy length iprange ttl hashlimit ecn udplite udp tcp What can i do to compile or to enable the multiport module? Thanks in advance for your help

  Read the article

• Port Forwarding Using iptables on Ubuntu

  - by user141610

  This is the scenario. I have configured a web-server in MUX. Now I want to access that web-server from Internet. Ubuntu box has two interfaces, One is connected to WAN (Public IP) and another one is connected to MUX (Private IP). MUX has no option to insert default gateway. iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth0 -d 103.x.x.x --dport 8001 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.2:8080 iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -d 192.168.1.2 --dport 8080 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT It does not work. Thanks...

  Read the article

• Iptables rules make communication so slow

  - by mmc18

  When I have send a request to an application running on a machine which following firewall rules are applied, it waits so long. When I have deactivated the iptables rule, it responses immediately. What makes communication so slow? -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p esp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i ppp+ -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 500 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 4500 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 1701 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -m state --state NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m limit --limit 5/min -j LOG --log-prefix "iptables denied: " --log-level 7 -A FORWARD -i ppp+ -m state --state NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

  Read the article

• Block all ports except SSH/HTTP in ipchains and iptables

  - by user198003

  How can I block all ports except ssh (port 22) httpd (port 80) using iptables and iphains?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >