Search Results

Search found 7311 results on 293 pages for 'rows'.

Page 97/293 | < Previous Page | 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104  | Next Page >

  • mysql query performance help

    - by Stefano
    Hi I have a quite large table storing words contained in email messages mysql> explain t_message_words; +----------------+---------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +----------------+---------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | mwr_key | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | mwr_message_id | int(11) | NO | MUL | NULL | | | mwr_word_id | int(11) | NO | MUL | NULL | | | mwr_count | int(11) | NO | | 0 | | +----------------+---------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ table contains about 100M rows mwr_message_id is a FK to messages table mwr_word_id is a FK to words table mwr_count is the number of occurrencies of word mwr_word_id in message mwr_message_id To calculate most used words, I use the following query SELECT SUM(mwr_count) AS word_count, mwr_word_id FROM t_message_words GROUP BY mwr_word_id ORDER BY word_count DESC LIMIT 100; that runs almost forever (more than half an hour on the test server) mysql> show processlist; +----+------+----------------+--------+---------+------+----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- | Id | User | Host | db | Command | Time | State | Info +----+------+----------------+--------+---------+------+----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- processlist | 41 | root | localhost:3148 | tst_db | Query | 1955 | Copying to tmp table | SELECT SUM(mwr_count) AS word_count, mwr_word_id FROM t_message_words GROUP BY mwr_word_id | +----+------+----------------+--------+---------+------+----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- 3 rows in set (0.00 sec) Is there anything I can do to "speed up" the query (apart from adding more ram, more cpu, faster disks)? thank you in advance stefano

    Read the article

  • Remove Duplicates from List of HashMap Entries

    - by HonorGod
    I have a List<HashMap<String,Object>> which represents a database where each list record is a database row. I have 10 columns in my database. There are several rows where the values of 2 particular columns are equals. I need to remove the duplicates from the list after the list is updated with all the rows from database. What is the efficient way? FYI - I am not able to do distinct while querying the database, because the GroupName is added at a later stage to the Map after the database is loaded. And since Id column is not primary key, once you add GroupName to the Map. You will have duplicates based on Id + GroupName combination! Hope my question makes sense. Let me know if we need more clarification.

    Read the article

  • JQuery autocomplete: is not working asp.net

    - by Abu Hamzah
    is that something wrong in the below code? its not firing at all edit <%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="HostPage.aspx.cs" Inherits="HostPage" %> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head runat="server"> <title>Untitled Page</title> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4/jquery.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.8/jquery-ui.min.js"></script> <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://dev.jquery.com/view/trunk/plugins/autocomplete/jquery.autocomplete.css" type="text/css" /> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://dev.jquery.com/view/trunk/plugins/autocomplete/jquery.autocomplete.js"></script> </head> <body> <form id="form1" runat="server"> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $("#<%=txtHost.UniqueID %>").autocomplete("HostService.asmx/GetHosts", { dataType: 'json' , contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8" , parse: function(data) { var rows = Array(); debugger for (var i = 0; i < data.length; i++) { rows[i] = { data: data[i], value: data[i].LName, result: data[i].LName }; } return rows; } , formatItem: function(row, i, max) { return data.LName + ", " + data.FName; } }); }); </script> <div> <asp:Label runat="server" ID='Label4' >Host Name:</asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="txtHost" runat='server'></asp:TextBox> <p> </div> </form> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • How to create following Pivot table ?

    - by Vamshi
    Hi! Can we create pivot table with Multiple columns and each column contains multiple rows. For example........... Database Table: BatchID BatchName Chemical Value -------------------------------------------------------- BI-1 BN-1 CH-1 1 BI-2 BN-2 CH-2 2 -------------------------------------------------------- This is the table , i need to display like below in Excel Sheet BI-1 BI-2 BN-1 BN-2 ------------------------------------------ CH-1 1 null ------------------------------------------ CH-2 null 2 ------------------------------------------ Here BI-1,BN-1 are two rows in a single columns i need to display chemical value as row of that. Could Please help me to solve this problem. Thank You.

    Read the article

  • Will this Java regex return a single result or multiple

    - by Blankman
    If my HTML is: <tr><td>....</td><hr></tr> <tr><td>....</td><hr></tr> <tr><td>....</td><hr></tr> <tr><td>....</td><hr></tr> <tr><td>....</td><hr></tr> <tr><td>....</td><hr></tr> If my regex is: Patterp p = Pattern.compile("<tr>(.*)<hr></tr>"); Should this get 1 result or all the individual rows? Is there a way to force it to get all the rows and not just the entire html from the top <tr> to the last instance of <hr></tr> ?

    Read the article

  • Assert parameters in a table-valued UDF

    - by Clay Lenhart
    Is there a way to create "asserts" on the parameters of a table-valued UDF. I'd like to use a table-valued UDF for performance reasons, however I know that certain parameter combinations (like start and end dates that are more than a month apart) will cause performance issues on the server for all users. End users query the database via Excel using UDFs. UDFs (and table-valued UDFs in particular) are useful when the data is too large for Excel. Users write simple SQL queries that categorizes the data into groups to reduce the number of rows. For example, the user may be interested in weekly aggregates rather than hourly ones. Users write a group by SELECT statement to reduce the rows by 24x7=168 times. I know I can write RAISERROR statements in multistatement UDFs, but table-valued UDFs are integrated in the query optimizer so these queries are more efficient with table-valued UDFs. So, can I define assertions on the parameters passed to a table-valued UDF?

    Read the article

  • In SQL / MySQL, can a Left Outer Join be used to find out the duplicates when there is no Primary ID

    - by Jian Lin
    I would like to try using Outer Join to find out duplicates in a table: If a table has Primary Index ID, then the following outer join can find out the duplicate names: mysql> select * from gifts; +--------+------------+-----------------+---------------------+ | giftID | name | filename | effectiveTime | +--------+------------+-----------------+---------------------+ | 2 | teddy bear | bear.jpg | 2010-04-24 04:36:03 | | 3 | coffee | coffee123.jpg | 2010-04-24 05:10:43 | | 6 | beer | beer_glass.png | 2010-04-24 05:18:12 | | 10 | heart | heart_shape.jpg | 2010-04-24 05:11:29 | | 11 | ice tea | icetea.jpg | 2010-04-24 05:19:53 | | 12 | cash | cash.png | 2010-04-24 05:27:44 | | 13 | chocolate | choco.jpg | 2010-04-25 04:04:31 | | 14 | coffee | latte.jpg | 2010-04-27 05:49:52 | | 15 | coffee | espresso.jpg | 2010-04-27 06:03:03 | +--------+------------+-----------------+---------------------+ 9 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from gifts g1 LEFT JOIN (select * from gifts group by name) g2 on g1.giftID = g2.giftID where g2.giftID IS NULL; +--------+--------+--------------+---------------------+--------+------+----------+---------------+ | giftID | name | filename | effectiveTime | giftID | name | filename | effectiveTime | +--------+--------+--------------+---------------------+--------+------+----------+---------------+ | 14 | coffee | latte.jpg | 2010-04-27 05:49:52 | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | | 15 | coffee | espresso.jpg | 2010-04-27 06:03:03 | NULL | NULL | NULL | NULL | +--------+--------+--------------+---------------------+--------+------+----------+---------------+ 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) But what if the table doesn't have a Primary Index ID, then can an outer join still be used to find out duplicates?

    Read the article

  • Silverlight - Disabling Item Selection from ListBox

    - by Villager
    Hello, I have a ListBox defined in Silverlight. Each item in this ListBox has a CheckBox. Based on some rules when the ListBox is populated, some of the items in the ListBox get selected. This is used just for the sake of highlighting certain rows. When a user clicks an item in the ListBox, I want to check or uncheck the CheckBox in the item. However, I want to leave the item as appeared as selected because of the highlighting. Is there a way to do this? If not, is there a repeater control where I can highlight certain rows but not others when items are loaded? Thank you,

    Read the article

  • Creating an Excel file using .NET (C#) - Problems with columns headers!

    - by tsocks
    Hello, I want to create & fill a .xls file using ADO.NET or LINQ, but I do not want to have the columns names in the first row. I just want to insert rows starting in row no. 1. I know I have to insert colums first, but... is there a way to 'hide' those columns headers? The problem is that, in first row of my spreadsheet, I must have only two values (one in A1 and the other in B1), but in the remaining rows I'll be inserting more than just two values (maximum 15 columns). I'm open to suggestions/hacks/tricks even if that's not the best way of doing this. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Update gridview from code behind in asp.net

    - by Zerotoinfinite
    Hi Experts, I have gridview in my asp.net 3.5 application [C#]. Which looks like this: AutoGenerateDeleteButton="true" DataKeyNames="studentId" runat="server" OnRowEditing="GridView1_RowEditing" OnRowCancelingEdit="GridView1_RowCancelingEdit" OnRowDeleting="GridView1_RowDeleting" OnRowUpdating="GridView1_RowUpdating" onpageindexchanging="GridView1_PageIndexChanging" onrowupdated="GridView1_RowUpdated" <EmptyDataTemplate> <asp:Label ID="lblNoRecord" runat="server" Text="No Record Found" ForeColor="Red"></asp:Label> </EmptyDataTemplate> </asp:GridView> Now, In rowUpdating event, I am writing the below code: protected void GridView1_RowUpdating(object sender, GridViewUpdateEventArgs e) { int mytext = Convert.ToInt16(GridView1.Rows[e.RowIndex].Cells[1].Text); string cConatiner = GridView1.Rows[e.RowIndex].Cells[4].Text; } In this, myText is giving me the correct value, i.e. of the 1st column but when I am changing the cell value to 1,2,3,4,5,6 I am getting empty. Am I doing it incorrectly ? Please help me. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Why won't my anonymous function fire on grid.prerender?

    - by adam0101
    In my gridview I have fields for inserting a new record in the footer. In my objectdatasource selecting event if no records came back I bind a single mock row to force the footer to show so they can still add records. Since the row does not contain real data I hide the row. ... If result.ItemCount = 0 Then result = mockRow AddHandler mygridview.PreRender, AddressOf HideRow End If End Sub Private Sub HideRow(ByVal sender as Object, ByVal e as EventArgs) mygridview.Rows(0).Visible = False End Sub This works fine. However, I'd like to condense it like this: ... If result.ItemCount = 0 Then result = mockRow AddHandler mygridview.PreRender, Function() mygridview.Rows(0).Visible = False End If End Sub This compiles fine, but the row doesn't get hidden. Can anyone tell me why my anonymous function isn't getting hit?

    Read the article

  • cant populate cells with an array when i have loaded a second UITableViewController

    - by richard Stephenson
    hi there, im very new to iphone programming, im creating my first app, (a world cup one) the first view is a table view. the cell text label is filled with an array, so it shows all the groups (group a, B, c,ect) then when you select a group, it pulls on another UITableViewcontroller, but whatever i do i cant set the text label of the cells (e.g france,mexico,south africa, etc. infact nothin i do to the cellForRowAtIndexPath makes a difference , could someone tell me what im doing wrong please Thanks `here is my code for the view controller #import "GroupADetailViewController.h" @implementation GroupADetailViewController @synthesize groupLabel = _groupLabel; @synthesize groupADetail = _groupADetail; @synthesize teamsInGroupA; #pragma mark Memory management - (void)dealloc { [_groupADetail release]; [_groupLabel release]; [super dealloc]; } #pragma mark View lifecycle - (void)viewDidLoad { [super viewDidLoad]; // Set the number label to show the number data teamsInGroupA = [[NSArray alloc]initWithObjects:@"France",@"Mexico",@"Uruguay",@"South Africa",nil]; NSLog(@"loaded"); // Set the title to also show the number data [[self navigationItem]setTitle:@"Group A"]; //[[self navigationItem]cell.textLabel.text:@"test"]; //[[self navigationItem] setTitle[NSString String } - (void)viewDidUnload { [self setgroupLabel:nil]; } #pragma mark Table view methods - (NSInteger)numberOfSectionsInTableView:(UITableView*)tableView { // Return the number of sections in the table view return 1; } - (NSInteger)tableView:(UITableView*)tableView numberOfRowsInSection:(NSInteger)section { // Return the number of rows in a specific section // Since we only have one section, just return the number of rows in the table return 4; NSLog:("count is %d",[teamsInGroupA count]); } - (UITableViewCell*)tableView:(UITableView*)tableView cellForRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath*)indexPath { static NSString *cellIdentifier2 = @"Cell2"; // Reuse an existing cell if one is available for reuse UITableViewCell *cell = [tableView dequeueReusableCellWithIdentifier:cellIdentifier2]; // If no cell was available, create a new one if (cell == nil) { NSLog(@"no cell, creating"); cell = [[[UITableViewCell alloc] initWithStyle:UITableViewCellStyleDefault reuseIdentifier:cellIdentifier2] autorelease]; [cell setAccessoryType:UITableViewCellAccessoryDisclosureIndicator]; } NSLog(@"cell already there"); // Configure the cell to show the data for this row //[[cell textLabel]setText:[NSString string //[[cell textLabel]setText:[teamsInGroupA objectAtIndex:indexPath.row]]; //NSUInteger row = [indexPath row]; //[cell setText:[[teamsInGroupA objectAtIndex:indexPath:row]retain]]; //cell.textLabel.text:@"Test" [[cell textLabel]setText:[teamsInGroupA objectAtIndex:indexPath.row]]; return cell; } @end #import "GroupADetailViewController.h" @implementation GroupADetailViewController @synthesize groupLabel = _groupLabel; @synthesize groupADetail = _groupADetail; @synthesize teamsInGroupA; #pragma mark Memory management - (void)dealloc { [_groupADetail release]; [_groupLabel release]; [super dealloc]; } #pragma mark View lifecycle - (void)viewDidLoad { [super viewDidLoad]; // Set the number label to show the number data teamsInGroupA = [[NSArray alloc]initWithObjects:@"France",@"Mexico",@"Uruguay",@"South Africa",nil]; NSLog(@"loaded"); // Set the title to also show the number data [[self navigationItem]setTitle:@"Group A"]; //[[self navigationItem]cell.textLabel.text:@"test"]; //[[self navigationItem] setTitle[NSString String } - (void)viewDidUnload { [self setgroupLabel:nil]; } #pragma mark Table view methods - (NSInteger)numberOfSectionsInTableView:(UITableView*)tableView { // Return the number of sections in the table view return 1; } - (NSInteger)tableView:(UITableView*)tableView numberOfRowsInSection:(NSInteger)section { // Return the number of rows in a specific section // Since we only have one section, just return the number of rows in the table return 4; NSLog:("count is %d",[teamsInGroupA count]); } - (UITableViewCell*)tableView:(UITableView*)tableView cellForRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath*)indexPath { static NSString *cellIdentifier2 = @"Cell2"; // Reuse an existing cell if one is available for reuse UITableViewCell *cell = [tableView dequeueReusableCellWithIdentifier:cellIdentifier2]; // If no cell was available, create a new one if (cell == nil) { NSLog(@"no cell, creating"); cell = [[[UITableViewCell alloc] initWithStyle:UITableViewCellStyleDefault reuseIdentifier:cellIdentifier2] autorelease]; [cell setAccessoryType:UITableViewCellAccessoryDisclosureIndicator]; } NSLog(@"cell already there"); // Configure the cell to show the data for this row //[[cell textLabel]setText:[NSString string //[[cell textLabel]setText:[teamsInGroupA objectAtIndex:indexPath.row]]; //NSUInteger row = [indexPath row]; //[cell setText:[[teamsInGroupA objectAtIndex:indexPath:row]retain]]; //cell.textLabel.text:@"Test" [[cell textLabel]setText:[teamsInGroupA objectAtIndex:indexPath.row]]; return cell; } @end

    Read the article

  • Datatable and Datagridview.

    - by Harikrishna
    I have datatable table like id name address phoneno 1 abc kfjskl 798798 2 bcd kjdsfl 808909 3 899009 fjsh kjllkjl 5 jfkd And I am displaying this value in the datagridview by code dataGridView1.ColumnCount = Table.Columns.Count; dataGridView1.RowCount = Table.Rows.Count; for (int i = 0; i < dataGridView1.RowCount; i++) { for (int j = 0; j < dataGridView1.ColumnCount; j++) { dataGridView1[j, i].Value = Table.Rows[i][j].ToString(); } } Now I don't want to display row that has some missing value like If I will do that then the datagridview will look like 1 abc kfjskl 798798 2 bcd kjdsfl 808909 How can I do that ?

    Read the article

  • Erlang Mnesia Equivalent of SQL Select FROM WHERE Field IN (value1, value2, value3, ...)

    - by ErJab
    I have an mnesia table with fields say f1, f2, f3. Now if I were to select all the rows with the field value as V1, I would use mnesia:select and match specifications or a simple mnesia:match_object. Now I need to select all the rows which have V1, V2, V3 ... or Vn (a list of arbitrary length) as the value for field f1. In SQL I would do something like SELECT * FROM tablename WHERE f3 IN (V1, V2, V3, ... , Vn) How do I do this in mnesia?

    Read the article

  • DOM and Javascript

    - by Bob Smith
    I let a user reconfigure the location of a set of rows in a table by giving them ability to move them up and down. The changes are done by swapping nodes in the DOM. After the user has moved rows around, when I do a view source, I see the HTML in the original state (before the user made any changes). Can someone explain why that is? My understanding was when we do any DOM operations, the underlying HTML will be changed as well. EDIT: Does that mean on the server side, when attempt to get the state after user's changes, I will be able to get what I need? I am using C#/ASP.NET. Could it be because this is a HTML table (not ASP.NET Server control), that it's not maintaining the state of the changes?

    Read the article

  • Does the chunk of the System.Collections.Concurrent.Partitioner need to be thread safe?

    - by Scott Chamberlain
    I am working with the Parallel libraries in .net 4 and I am creating a Partitioner and the example shown in the MSDN only has a chunk size of 1 (every time a new result is retrieved it hits the data source instead of the local cache. The version I am writing will pull 10000 SQL rows at a time then feed the rows from the cache until it is empty then pull another batch. Each partition in the Partitioner has its own chunk. I know every time I call to the IEnumerator in from the SQL data-source that needs to be thread safe but for use in a Parallel.ForEach do I need to make every call to the cache for the chunking thread safe?

    Read the article

  • How to sekect latest chnge done in the given Table structure?

    - by OM The Eternity
    I have a Table structure as id, trackid, table_name, operation, oldvalue, newvalue, field, changedonetime Now if I have 3 rows for the same "trackid" same "field", then how can i select the latest out of the three? i.e. for e.g.: id = 100 trackid = 152 table_name = jos_menu operation= UPDATE oldvalue = IPL newvalue = IPLcccc field = name live = 0 changedonetime = 2010-04-30 17:54:39 and id = 101 trackid = 152 table_name = jos_menu operation= UPDATE oldvalue = IPLcccc newvalue = IPL2222 field = name live = 0 changedonetime = 2010-04-30 18:54:39 As u can see above the secind entry is the latest change, Now what query I shoud use to get the only one and Latest row out of many such rows...

    Read the article

  • MySQL + MyISAM table size question

    - by alessandro ferrucci
    Hello, I have a test table. The test table is as follows: CREATE TABLE mytest ( num1 int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, KEY key1 (num1) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1; I inserted 50 million rows in this table. When I do show table status the avg_row_length is 7. I was expecting to see 4 since mySQL uses 4 bytes for integers. Does the key have an effect on the avg_row_length? When I look at my .MYD file the size is 334 MB which is exactly what it should be given that the avg_row_length is 7, however I was really expecting to see 190 MB given that I only have an int. +----------------+--------+---------+------------+----------+----------------+-------------+------------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+---------------------+---------------------+------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+---------+ | Name | Engine | Version | Row_format | Rows | Avg_row_length | Data_length | Max_data_length | Index_length | Data_free | Auto_increment | Create_time | Update_time | Check_time | Collation | Checksum | Create_options | Comment | +----------------+--------+---------+------------+----------+----------------+-------------+------------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+---------------------+---------------------+------------+-------------------+----------+----------------+---------+ | mytest | MyISAM | 10 | Fixed | 50000000 | 7 | 350000000 | 1970324836974591 | 600518656 | 0 | NULL | 2010-05-22 09:15:06 | 2010-05-22 19:32:53 | NULL | latin1_swedish_ci | NULL | | | I have included the output of show table status for mytest table. Sorry about the formatting :D Thanks in advance! Alessandro Ferrucci

    Read the article

  • Grouping with operands question

    - by Filip
    I have a table: mysql> desc kursy_bid; +-----------+-------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-----------+-------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | datetime | datetime | NO | PRI | NULL | | | currency | varchar(6) | NO | PRI | NULL | | | value | varchar(10) | YES | | NULL | | +-----------+-------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ 3 rows in set (0.01 sec) I would like to select some rows from a table, grouped by some time interval (can be one day) where I will have the first row and the last row of the group, the max(value) and min(value). I tried: select datetime, (select value order by datetime asc limit 1) open, (select value order by datetime desc limit 1) close, max(value), min(value) from kursy_bid_test where datetime > '2009-09-14 00:00:00' and currency = 'eurpln' group by month(datetime), day(datetime), hour(datetime); but the output is: | open | close | datetime | max(value) | min(value) | +--------+--------+---------------------+------------+------------+ | 1.4581 | 1.4581 | 2009-09-14 00:00:05 | 4.1712 | 1.4581 | | 1.4581 | 1.4581 | 2009-09-14 01:00:01 | 1.4581 | 1.4581 | As you see open and close is the same (but they shouldn't be). What should be the query to do what I want?

    Read the article

  • On Edit Grid view Multiple row edit validation

    - by franics
    I am using a telerik radgrid so there are around 5 columns each column edittemplate contains a control along with a required field validator and also a property called AllowMultiRowEdit is set to true so i am able to multiple rows in edit mode. If any of the values are cleared the for multiple rows I want only those to be validated on update of that particular row. So i implemented the Grids item data bound event find each and every validator along with the update button and set a unique validation group. The above implementation most times but fails at some time. Is there any other way of going about this ?

    Read the article

  • Adding a row to an existing datatable in JSF

    - by shyamb
    Hi, I have a requirement of changing an existing JSF 1.1 project where I need to add an additional row to a datatable on click of a button. Currently the datatable loads 3 rows from the backing bean and this new button should add additional rows to the datatable on each click. Using the suggestion provided by http://balusc.blogspot.com/2006/06/using-datatables.html I was able to display the additional row on the UI but I could not save the new data back to the database because the backing bean is in request scope and I cannot change the scope of this bean as it would create other issues. Can somebody provide me a solution to display the new row and also to save the data back to the database when the backing bean is in request scope. Thanks Shyam

    Read the article

  • Newbie question - MySQL index size

    - by Tommy
    I've just started to investigating how I should optimize my database. Indexing seems to be a good idea, so I want to index a VARCHAR column, the engine is MyISAM. From what I've read, I understand that an index is limited to a size of 1000 bytes. A VARCHAR character is 3 bytes in size. Does this mean that if I want to index a VARCHAR column with 50 rows, I need an index prefix of 6 characters? I came to that number by dividing 1000 with the row number 50, then the bytesize per character that is 3. 1000/50/3=6,66. It seems a little complicated, so I'm just wondering if I'm thinking right? It seems weird to me that you'd only be able to index 333 rows in a VARCHAR column, using a prefix of 1 character.

    Read the article

  • How do I improve the efficiency of the queries executed by this generic Linq-to-SQL data access clas

    - by Lee D
    Hi all, I have a class which provides generic access to LINQ to SQL entities, for example: class LinqProvider<T> //where T is a L2S entity class { DataContext context; public virtual IEnumerable<T> GetAll() { return context.GetTable<T>(); } public virtual T Single(Func<T, bool> condition) { return context.GetTable<T>().SingleOrDefault(condition); } } From the front end, both of these methods appear to work as you would expect. However, when I run a trace in SQL profiler, the Single method is executing what amounts to a SELECT * FROM [Table], and then returning the single entity that meets the given condition. Obviously this is inefficient, and is being caused by GetTable() returning all rows. My question is, how do I get the query executed by the Single() method to take the form SELECT * FROM [Table] WHERE [condition], rather than selecting all rows then filtering out all but one? Is it possible in this context? Any help appreciated, Lee

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104  | Next Page >