Search Results

Search found 46178 results on 1848 pages for 'java home'.

Page 977/1848 | < Previous Page | 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984  | Next Page >

  • Can I bypass an intermediate object in hibernate

    - by Jherico
    I have top level entities TRACK, MEDIA_GROUP and MEDIA, each with an integer primary key. I also have a join table from TRACK to MEDIA_GROUP which is 1:1 and MEDIA has a FK column into MEDIA_GROUP. I'm trying to find a way in hibernate to map a collection of Media directly into the Track object, bypassing the creation of a MediaGroup object. Basically I want to turn this: TRACK <-> MEDIA_TRACK_MAP <-> MEDIA_GROUP <-> MEDIA into this: TRACK <-> MEDIA_TRACK_MAP <-> MEDIA But the join column between MEDIA_TRACK_MAP and MEDIA isn't the primary key of MEDIA.

    Read the article

  • Why Hibernates ignores the name attribute of the @Column annotation?

    - by svachon
    Using Hibernate 3.3.1 and Hibernate Annotations 3.4, the database is DB2/400 V6R1, running that on WebSphere 7.0.0.9 I have the following class @Entity public class Ciinvhd implements Serializable { @Id private String ihinse; @Id @Column(name="IHINV#") private BigDecimal ihinv; .... } For reasons I can't figure, Hibernate ignores the specified column name and uses 'ihinv' to generate the SQL: select ciinvhd0_.ihinse as ihinse13_, ciinvhd0_.ihinv as ihinv13_, ... Which of course gives me the following error: Column IHINV not in table CIINVHD Did anyone had this problem before? I have other entities that are very alike in the way that they are using # in their database field names and that are part of the PK and I don't have this problem with them.

    Read the article

  • How to deploy to Tomcat from NetBeans?

    - by deamon
    I've added Tomcat in the "Tools Servers" menu and as you can see it appears in the list of servers: But when I try to run my project, I cannot select Tomcat! The drop-down with servers is empty. I tried it with NetBeans 6.8 and 6.9 Beta. Any idea?

    Read the article

  • String Object. Clarification needed

    - by mac
    Guys, help me clarify. Say i have the following line in my program: jobSetupErrors.append("abc"); In the case above where jobSetupErrors is a StringBuilder(), what i see happen is: New String Object is created and assigned value "abc" value of that String object is assigned to the existing StringBuilder object If that is correct, and I add 1 more line ... jobSetupErrors.append("abc"); logger.info("abc"); In the above example are we creating String object separately 2 times? If so, would it be more proper to do something like this? String a = "abc"; jobSetupErrors.append(a); logger.info(a); Is this a better approach? Please advise

    Read the article

  • About NullPointer Exception in Arraylist

    - by user2234456
    List<PrcSubList> listSl = new ArrayList<PrcSubList>(); if (listSl == null || listSl.size() == 0) { PrcSubList subListAdd=coreService.addSubListByAddAlert(childSub); System.out.println("sublist after insert db :" + subListAdd.getName()); listSl.add(subListAdd); System.out.println(listSl.size() +" sublist after insert list:" + listSl.get(0).getName()); } Ouput with first System.out.println("sublist after insert db :" + subListAdd.getName()); sublist after insert db :SYSTEM_ALERT_12312313 Problem But i have NullPointerException with 2nd System.out.println(listSl.size() +" sublist after insert list:" + listSl.get(0).getName()); Can you help me!

    Read the article

  • Q about AbstractApplicationContext.getBeansOfType() and getBean()

    - by Paul Reiners
    We have the following legacy 2.0.7 Spring code: final Map<String, MyClass> secondaryFactories = (Map<String, MyClass>) context.getBeansOfType(MyClass.class, false, true); return (MyClass) context.getBean("myClass"); where context is an instance of org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext Note that we ignore the return value of getBeansOfType(). This works just fine, but the problem is that the call to getBeansOfType() is time-consuming. However, even though we ignore the return value of this call, if we try to eliminate this call, then the instance of MyClass returned by getBean() is not fully initialized. (So, apparently, the call to getBeansOfType() is having some sort of side-effects that we need.) We suspect that the call to getBeansOfType() is overkill and we could do something more lightweight so that the instance of MyClass obtained by the call to getBean() would be fully initialized (but it's not null and no exception is thrown). So, is there a more efficient way of doing this?

    Read the article

  • Controlling race condition at startup.

    - by Will Hartung
    I have some code that I want to have some one time initialisation performed. But this code doesn't have a definite lifecycle, so my logic can be potentially invoked by multiple threads before my initialisation is done. So, I want to basically ensure that my logic code "waits" until initialisation is done. This is my first cut. public class MyClass { private static final AtomicBoolean initialised = new AtomicBoolean(false); public void initialise() { synchronized(initialised) { initStuff(); initialised.getAndSet(true); initialised.notifyAll(); } } public void doStuff() { synchronized(initialised) { if (!initialised.get()) { try { initialised.wait(); } catch (InterruptedException ex) { throw new RuntimeException("Uh oh!", ex); } } } doOtherStuff(); } } I basically want to make sure this is going to do what I think it's going to do -- block doStuff until the initialised is true, and that I'm not missing a race condition where doStuff might get stuck on a Object.wait() that will never arrive. Edit: I have no control over the threads. And I want to be able to control when all of the initialisation is done, which is why doStuff() can't call initialise(). I used an AtomicBoolean as it was a combination of a value holder, and an object I could synchronize. I could have also simply had a "public static final Object lock = new Object();" and a simple boolean flag. AtomicBoolean conveniently gave me both. A Boolean can not be modified. The CountDownLatch is exactly what I was looking for. I also considered using a Sempahore with 0 permits. But the CountDownLatch is perfect for just this task.

    Read the article

  • For a Chemical Equation Balancer App (Android), how do I count the number of atoms of each element in each term?

    - by Upas
    This is my app: If someone enters "C6H12O6+O2=CO2+H2O", then I have already written code to split the equation into terms, so in an ArrayList called rterms I have the strings: C6H12O6 CO2 and in another ArrayList called pterms, I have: CO2 H2O I need to count the number of C's in each term of the reactants, so 6 for term 1, 0 for term 2, and then the H's and then O's. How would I do this? Any help is appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Refactoring a complicated if-condition

    - by kumar kasimala
    Hi all, Can anyone suggest best way to avoid most if conditions? I have below code, I want avoid most of cases if conditions, how to do it ? any solution is great help; if (adjustment.adjustmentAccount.isIncrease) { if (adjustment.increaseVATLine) { if (adjustment.vatItem.isSalesType) { entry2.setDebit(adjustment.total); entry2.setCredit(0d); } else { entry2.setCredit(adjustment.total); entry2.setDebit(0d); } } else { if (adjustment.vatItem.isSalesType) { entry2.setCredit(adjustment.total); entry2.setDebit(0d); } else { entry2.setDebit(adjustment.total); entry2.setCredit(0d); } } } else { if (adjustment.increaseVATLine) { if (adjustment.vatItem.isSalesType) { entry2.setCredit(adjustment.total); entry2.setDebit(0d); } else { entry2.setDebit(adjustment.total); entry2.setCredit(0d); } } else { if (adjustment.vatItem.isSalesType) { entry2.setDebit(adjustment.total); entry2.setCredit(0d); } else { entry2.setCredit(adjustment.total); entry2.setDebit(0d); } } }

    Read the article

  • What will happen if the code can't finished on time...

    - by Tattat
    If I set a timer to execute a code every 3 seconds. If the code isn't finished in 3 seconds, what will happen? The computer will terminal the code or wait for the code finish or continue the timer, and execute the code with the unfinished code concurrently. int delay = 0; // delay for 0 sec. int period = 3000; // repeat 3 sec. Timer timer = new Timer(); timer.scheduleAtFixedRate(new TimerTask() { public void run() { // Task here ... // It may take more than 3 sec to finish, what will happen? } }, delay, period);

    Read the article

  • using Hibernate to loading 20K products, modifying the entity and updating to db

    - by Blankman
    I am using hibernate to update 20K products in my database. As of now I am pulling in the 20K products, looping through them and modifying some properties and then updating the database. so: load products foreach products session begintransaction productDao.MakePersistant(p); session commit(); As of now things are pretty slow compared to your standard jdbc, what can I do to speed things up? I am sure I am doing something wrong here.

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to get collection of some ejb`s instances from container?

    - by kislo_metal
    Hi! Scenario: I have some @Statefull bean for user session (not an http session, it is web services session). And I need to manage user`s session per user. Goal: I need to have possibility to get collection of @Statefull UserSession`s instances and control maximum number of session`s per user, and session`s life time. Q: Is it possible to get Collection of ejb`s instances from ejb container, instead of storing them in some collection, map etc. ? I am using glassfish v3 , ejb 3.1, jax-ws. Thank You!

    Read the article

  • Returning and instance of a Class given its .class (MyClass.class)

    - by jax
    I have an enum that will hold my algorithms. I cannot instantiate these classes because I need the application context which is only available once the application has started. I want to load the class at runtime when I choose by calling getAlgorithm(Context cnx). How do I easily instantiate a class at runtime given its .class (and my constructor takes arguments)? All my classes are subclasses of Algorithm. public enum AlgorithmTypes { ALL_FROM_9_AND_LAST_FROM_10_ID(AlgorithmFactory.AlgorithmAllFrom9AndLastFrom10Impl.class), ALL_FROM_9_AND_LAST_FROM_10_CURRENCY_ID(AlgorithmFactory.AlgorithmAllFrom9AndLastFrom10Impl.class), DIVIDE_BY_9_LESS_THAN_100(AlgorithmFactory.AlgorithmAllFrom9AndLastFrom10Impl.class), TABLES_BEYOND_5_BY_5(AlgorithmFactory.AlgorithmAllFrom9AndLastFrom10Impl.class); private Class<? extends Algorithm> algorithm; AlgorithmTypes(Class<? extends Algorithm> c) { algorithm = c; } public Algorithm getAlgorithm(Context cnx) { return //needs to return the current algoriths constructor which takes the Context Algorithm(Context cnx); } }

    Read the article

  • LRU LinkedHashMap that limits size based on available memory

    - by sanity
    I want to create a LinkedHashMap which will limit its size based on available memory (ie. when freeMemory + (maxMemory - allocatedMemory) gets below a certain threshold). This will be used as a form of cache, probably using "least recently used" as a caching strategy. My concern though is that allocatedMemory also includes (I assume) un-garbage collected data, and thus will over-estimate the amount of used memory. I'm concerned about the unintended consequences this might have. For example, the LinkedHashMap may keep deleting items because it thinks there isn't enough free memory, but the free memory doesn't increase because these deleted items aren't being garbage collected immediately. Does anyone have any experience with this type of thing? Is my concern warranted? If so, can anyone suggest a good approach? I should add that I also want to be able to "lock" the cache, basically saying "ok, from now on don't delete anything because of memory usage issues".

    Read the article

  • Why is the output like this?

    - by javatechi
    class another { public void method(Object o) { System.out.println("This is in method which takes object"); } public void method(String s) { System.out.println("This is method which takes string"); } } public class NewClass { public static void main(String args[]) { another an = new another(); an.method(null); } } When I try to execute this, I get This is method which takes string as the output. Why not "This is in method which takes object"? Object can also be null and string can also be null, why doesn't it invoke first method?

    Read the article

  • jre1.6.0_27 HashMap values() sourcecode

    - by Liu guanghua
    Today, I opened jre1.6.0_27 HashMap values() method sourcecode 389 public Set<K> keySet() 390 { 391 Set localSet = this.keySet; 392 return (this.keySet = new KeySet(null)); 393 } 394 395 public Collection<V> values() 396 { 397 Collection localCollection = this.values; 398 return (this.values = new Values(null)); 399 } I think these sourcecode are error, but I don't know why they look like this. Who can tell me why?

    Read the article

  • Issue with a JPA query

    - by boyd4715
    I am trying to execute the following JPA query: public static final String UPDATE_INVENTORY_CUSTOMER_FOR_AMS_MAPPING = "UPDATE Inventory inventory SET" + " inventory.customer.id = :" + DataAccessConstants.PARAM_CUSTOMER_ID + " ,inventory.lastUpdateUserId = :" + DataAccessConstants.PARAM_USER_ID + " where inventory.amsConsignorName = :" + DataAccessConstants.PARAM_AMS_CONSIGNOR_NAME + " and inventory.amsConsignorOrgCd = :" + DataAccessConstants.PARAM_AMS_CONSIGNOR_ORG_CD + " and inventory.amsConsignorTypeName = :" + DataAccessConstants.PARAM_AMS_CONSIGNOR_TYPE + " and inventory.status.code in (:" + DataAccessConstants.PARAM_STATUS + ")"; but it is seeing the following: update ATL_INVENTORY, set CONSIGNOR_ID=?, LAST_UPDATE_USER_ID=? where AMS_CONSIGNOR_NAME=? and AMS_CONSIGNOR_ORG_CD=? and AMS_CONSIGNOR_TYPE_NAME=? and (CODE in (? , ? , ? , ?)) Any ideal as to why there is a comma after the table name?

    Read the article

  • AJAX Problem - No response text in FireFox, but ok in IE

    - by Taiba
    Hi, I am making a simple AJAX call to an external site. It works ok in IE, but in Firefox, not response text is returned. I think it might have something to do with the response being "chunked", but I'm not sure. Any ideas? Thanks. function loadXMLDoc() { var xmlhttp; var urlString = "http://drc.edeliver.com.au/ratecalc.asp?Pickup_Postcode=6025&Destination_Postcode=6055&Country=AU&Weight=100&Service_Type=STANDARD&Length=100&Width=100&Height=100&Quantity=2"; if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {// code for IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest(); } else {// code for IE6, IE5 xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=function() { if (xmlhttp.readyState==4) { window.alert(xmlhttp.responseText); } } xmlhttp.open("GET", urlString, true); xmlhttp.send(); }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984  | Next Page >