Search Results

Search found 443 results on 18 pages for 'validates uniqueness of'.

Page 1/18 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Rails uniqueness constraint and matching db unique index for null column

    - by Dave
    I have the following in my migration file def self.up create_table :payment_agreements do |t| t.boolean :automatic, :default => true, :null => false t.string :payment_trigger_on_order t.references :supplier t.references :seller t.references :product t.timestamps end end I want to ensure that if a product_id is specified it is unique but I also want to allow null so I have the following in my model: validates :product_id, :uniqueness => true, :allow_nil => true Works great but I should then add an index to the migration file add_index :payment_agreements, :product_id, :unique => true Obviously this will throw an exception when two null values are inserted for product_id. I could just simply omit the index in the migration but then there's the chance that I'll get two PaymentAgreements with the same product_id as shown here: Concurrency and integrity My question is what is the best/most common way to deal with this problem

    Read the article

  • Rails Model multiple column uniqueness

    - by Jty.tan
    I am making a Viewer model with belongs_to :users belongs_to :orders that joins the models Users and Orders with a :has_many :through => :viewers. And the Viewer model has the attributes of user_id and order_id. How would I set it up so that new viewers are only accepted if both user_id and order_id are unique in the same row? I remember in MySQL being able to do so with a flag (although I can't for the life of me remember what it was), but I'm not sure how to do it with Rails. Can I do something like (for Viewer.rb) validates_uniqueness_of :user_id, :scope => :order_id?

    Read the article

  • Verify uniqueness of new content

    - by rogerkk
    I'm working on a review site, where there is a minor issue with almost duplicate reviews across items. Just a few words are changed. It would be very nice to be able to uncover these duplicates before they are approved by a moderator, and I'm hoping someone could chime in on the best strategy to get there. The site is running Ruby on Rails on a Postgres database and using Thinking Sphinx for search (all on Heroku), and so far the best option I see is to be pulling all the reviews out of the db and using a module like amatch to compare the strings. Not very efficient, so in this case I guess I'll have to limit the number/age of reviews to scan for dupes. Anyone got a better idea?

    Read the article

  • Validates presence of each other in two associated models

    - by Sergey Alekseev
    I have the following two models: class Parent < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :child, dependent: :destroy validates :child, presence: true end class Child < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :parent validates :parent, presence: true end I want to create Parent object. If I do the following: Parent.create! or Factory(:parent) Exception raises: ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed: Child can't be blank But I can't create Child object without Parent object for the same reason - I need to create Parent object first in order to pass presence validation. As it appears I have some kind of infinite recursion here. How to solve it?

    Read the article

  • Methods for content uniqueness calculation on C#

    - by sashaeve
    I have a set of text files. I want to calculate a content uniqueness for different subsets. E.g. we have 10 documents (A1 - A10) and want to calculate the uniqueness for subset of documents A1 and A2. So the result must be some value from 0 to 1 (1 - absolutely unique content, 0 - absolutely dublicated content). What methods for content uniqueness calculation do you know? Please suggest these methods with .NET implementations. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Google Apps, SPF, softfail problem (validates with validation tools, but still softfails otherwise)

    - by mq.chen
    Hi, I guess this is probably a commonly asked and boring question but I'm really at a loss and I don't know what else to do. This might be a duplicate of other questions, but none of the solutions worked for me. I've Googled around and read just about anything I could find but I'm still puzzled as to why it doesn't work. The gist of my problem is that I have set-up Google Apps for a client of mine with the domain fintan.dk. Everthing works just excellent, except emails sent from *@fintan.dk (either with the Gmail web-interface or desktop client) to a non-Google Apps email gets a softfail (I have sent to my University email, an email hosted at MediaTemple and even Hotmail). The emails gets a pass when sent to a Google Apps or Gmail address though... (All emails from that domain are sent via email clients.) So this is what I have done so far: I've added the SPF record Google recommended (v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all), waited several days hoping it would a DNS update delay problem. Now, three days later there is no change. I have verified the settings in the desktop clients several times. I have validated the records with validation tools like the SPF Query Tool, [email protected] and [email protected]. All of them validate and gives a pass, saying there shouldn't be a problem, but strangely there still is. So, I really don't know what else to do. Any help is very much appreciated. Thank you in advance!

    Read the article

  • App Engine Django Form Uniqueness Validation?

    - by GeekTantra
    Is there a simpler way to use uniqueness validation with Django Forms in AppEngine? I understand that performance would be problem if we keep an uniqueness constraint but since the amount of data being added is very small performance is not a big concern, rather development time is a concern here. Any help is appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Jquery validator plugin- Validates at least one in the group

    - by christian
    [http://jsfiddle.net/mhmBs/][1] I tried using the method that he uses in a jquery validator plugin.. My error container is separated from the form, it is outside the form. When I use that method to validated that the user input at least one from 3 input text boxes. It validates the field, but the other items to be validated is ignored specially the items before 3 input text boxes.

    Read the article

  • UID uniqueness of IMAP mails

    - by SecStone
    In our internal webmail system, we'd like to attach notes and contacts to certain mails. In order to do this, we have to keep track of every mail on our IMAP server. Unfortunately the IMAP standard doesn't enforce the uniqueness of the UID of a mail in a mailbox (just in subfolders). Is there any tool/IMAP server which generates UIDs which are truly unique? Or is there any other way how we can identify each mail? (the Message-ID header field is not unique as some mails do not contain such a field). Additional resources: Unique ID in IMAP protocol - Limilabs.com

    Read the article

  • How to validates cyrilic email in Rails 3.1?

    - by iKeler
    Let's say I had the email address like putin-crab@?????????.?? How to validate that address in rails 3.1? My Model(i use Mongoid): #encoding: utf-8 class User include Mongoid::Document field :email, :type => String validates :email, :presence => true, :format => { :with => RFC822::EMAIL } end For validations reqexp i use gem https://github.com/dim/rfc-822 in rails console (normal email): ruby-1.9.2-p290 :001 > usr = User.new( :email => "[email protected]" ) => #<User _id: 4ec627cf4934db7e4d000001, _type: nil, email: "[email protected]"> ruby-1.9.2-p290 :002 > usr.valid? => true in rails console (fu@#ing email): ruby-1.9.2-p290 :003 > usr = User.new( :email => "putin-crab@?????????.??" ) => #<User _id: 4ec627f44934db7e4d000002, _type: nil, email: "putin-crab@?????????.??"> ruby-1.9.2-p290 :004 > usr.valid? Encoding::CompatibilityError: incompatible encoding regexp match (ASCII-8BIT regexp with UTF-8 string) from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/format.rb:9:in `=~' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/format.rb:9:in `!~' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/format.rb:9:in `validate_each' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validator.rb:153:in `block in validate' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validator.rb:150:in `each' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validator.rb:150:in `validate' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:302:in `_callback_before_13' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:404:in `_run_validate_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:81:in `run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:42:in `block in run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:67:in `call' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:67:in `run_cascading_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:41:in `run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations.rb:212:in `run_validations!' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/callbacks.rb:53:in `block in run_validations!' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:390:in `_run_validation_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:81:in `run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:42:in `block in run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:67:in `call' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:67:in `run_cascading_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:41:in `run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/callbacks.rb:53:in `run_validations!' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations.rb:179:in `valid?' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/validations.rb:70:in `valid?' from (irb):4 from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/railties-3.1.1/lib/rails/commands/console.rb:45:in `start' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/railties-3.1.1/lib/rails/commands/console.rb:8:in `start' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/railties-3.1.1/lib/rails/commands.rb:40:in `<top (required)>' from script/rails:6:in `require'

    Read the article

  • Rails 2.3 uniqueness validation - how can I capture the value causing the error

    - by sa125
    Hi - I'm trying to capture the value that's throwing a uniqueness error (or for that matter, any other type of built-in validation) to display it in the :message option. Here's what I tried (didn't work) # inside the model validate_uniqueness_of :name, :message => "#{name} has already been taken" # also tried using #{:name} I could use a custom validation, but this beats the point of using something that's already integrated into AR. Any thoughts? thanks.

    Read the article

  • Validate uniqueness within a recent set

    - by Matchu
    Is there a standard Rails 3 way of detecting uniqueness within a particular scope, or is this custom validation all I can do? class Post < ActiveRecord::Base # [named scope for recent posts] validates do |post| if Post.recent.where('url = ?', post.url).count > 0 errors[:url] = 'has already been posted recently - thanks anyway!' end end end (Haven't yet tried that exact code, so there may be errors, but you get the idea.)

    Read the article

  • Domain validates but won't save

    - by marko
    I have the following setup. Class, say, Car that has a CarPart (belongsTo=[car:Car]). When I'm creating a Car I also want to create som default CarParts, so I do def car = new Car(bla bla bla) def part = new CarPart(car:car) Now, when I do car.validate() or part.validate() it seems fine. But when I do if(car.save && part.save() I get this exception: 2012-03-24 14:02:21,943 [http-8080-4] ERROR util.JDBCExceptionReporter - Batch entry 0 insert into car_part (version, car_id, id) values ('0', '297', '298') was aborted. Call getNextException to see the cause. 2012-03-24 14:02:21,943 [http-8080-4] ERROR util.JDBCExceptionReporter - ERROR: value too long for type character varying(6) 2012-03-24 14:02:21,943 [http-8080-4] ERROR events.PatchedDefaultFlushEventListener - Could not synchronize database state with session org.hibernate.exception.DataException: Could not execute JDBC batch update Stacktrace follows: java.sql.BatchUpdateException: Batch entry 0 insert into car_part (version, deal_id, id) values ('0', '297', '298') was aborted. Call getNextException to see the cause. at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Statement$BatchResultHandler.handleError(AbstractJdbc2Statement.java:2621) at org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.processResults(QueryExecutorImpl.java:1837) at org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.execute(QueryExecutorImpl.java:407) at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Statement.executeBatch(AbstractJdbc2Statement.java:2754) at $Proxy20.flush(Unknown Source) at ristretto.DealController$_closure5.doCall(DealController.groovy:109) at ristretto.DealController$_closure5.doCall(DealController.groovy) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722) Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • stop form during submission if it validates incorrectly

    - by muqman
    I am trying to use JavaScript to validate forms but if the form doesn't validate, I don't want the form to be sent to the "action" page. The validator: <script> function formSubmit() { document.getElementById("signup_form").submit(); var x=document.forms["signup_form"]["tname"].value; if (x==null || x=="") { alert("First name must be filled out"); return false; } } </script> The form itself: <form action="some_file.php" method="post" id="signup_form" name="signup_form" onsubmit="return formSubmit()"> But all this does is if the tname field empty, it will return an alert but as soon as the user hits ok, the form then redirects to some_file.php. What have I missed here? The submit button: <a href="" onclick="return formSubmit(); return false" class="purplebutton">Signup</a> So what have I missed? How do I avoid this in the future?

    Read the article

  • C# dictionary uniqueness for sibling classes using IEquatable<T>

    - by anthony
    I would like to store insances of two classes in a dictionary structure and use IEquatable to determine uniqueness of these instances. Both of these classes share an (abstract) base class. Consider the following classes: abstract class Foo { ... } class SubFoo1 : Foo { ... } class SubFoo2 : Foo { ... } The dictionary will be delcared: Dictionary<Foo, Bar> Which classes should be declared as IEquatable? And what should the generic type T be for those declarations? Is this even possible?

    Read the article

  • EF problem with entity re-ordering and uniqueness constraint

    - by wpfwannabe
    I am using Entity Framework and I've come to an interesting stumbling block. Let's say there is a db table "Item" with "sequence" column of type int (and others of course). Column "sequence" must be unique and it is used for (re)ordering of items. EF maps this table to "Item" class with "sequence" int property. Now let's say I want to swap position of two items by mutually exchanging each other's sequence number. Upon calling SaveChanges() EF throws an exception complaining about "sequence" uniqueness. It probably generates two UPDATEs and the first one probably fails. I assume that plain SQL solution to this issue is using a third UPDATE to introduce a unique sequence value in the process but I am stuck with EF. Any thoughts?

    Read the article

  • hibernate column uniqueness question

    - by Seth
    I'm still in the process of learning hibernate/hql and I have a question that's half best practices question/half sanity check. Let's say I have a class A: @Entity public class A { @Id @GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.AUTO) private Long id; @Column(unique=true) private String name = ""; //getters, setters, etc. omitted for brevity } I want to enforce that every instance of A that gets saved has a unique name (hence the @Column annotation), but I also want to be able to handle the case where there's already an A instance saved that has that name. I see two ways of doing this: 1) I can catch the org.hibernate.exception.ConstraintViolationException that could be thrown during the session.saveOrUpdate() call and try to handle it. 2) I can query for existing instances of A that already have that name in the DAO before calling session.saveOrUpdate(). Right now I'm leaning towards approach 2, because in approach 1 I don't know how to programmatically figure out which constraint was violated (there are a couple of other unique members in A). Right now my DAO.save() code looks roughly like this: public void save(A a) throws DataAccessException, NonUniqueNameException { Session session = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession(); try { session.beginTransaction(); Query query = null; //if id isn't null, make sure we don't count this object as a duplicate if(obj.getId() == null) { query = session.createQuery("select count(a) from A a where a.name = :name").setParameter("name", obj.getName()); } else { query = session.createQuery("select count(a) from A a where a.name = :name " + "and a.id != :id").setParameter("name", obj.getName()).setParameter("name", obj.getName()); } Long numNameDuplicates = (Long)query.uniqueResult(); if(numNameDuplicates > 0) throw new NonUniqueNameException(); session.saveOrUpdate(a); session.getTransaction().commit(); } catch(RuntimeException e) { session.getTransaction().rollback(); throw new DataAccessException(e); //my own class } } Am I going about this in the right way? Can hibernate tell me programmatically (i.e. not as an error string) which value is violating the uniqueness constraint? By separating the query from the commit, am I inviting thread-safety errors, or am I safe? How is this usually done? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Examples of interesting implementations of character stats?

    - by Tchalvak
    I've got this BBG going ( http://ninjawars.net ), and the character stats currently are simplistic. I'm looking to add a few stats to the current 1/2 (strength and maximum hitpoints, essentially). I've come up with: (strength (unchanged), speed, stamina, and some others that are somewhat interesting wildcard stats). However, I'm not satisfied with how boring the effects of some of these stats are, because they're very linear. Better stat, better effects of the stat, but the stats don't interact with each-other, there's no Rock-Paper-Scissors interaction, having more is always better all the time. So what I'd really like is to see examples of interesting character stats or effects of stats? Examples that I can think of off hand: Call of Cthulu's Insanity stat (things get really weird/chaotic if you start losing sanity) White Wolf stats, to a certain extent (the stats themselves have some basic effects, and all skills effectiveness base themselves off of stats as well) What are some other ways people have used stats to check out?

    Read the article

  • Logging IP address for uniqueness without storing the IP address itself for privacy

    - by szabgab
    In a web application when logging some data I'd like to make sure I can identify data that came at differetn times but from the same IP address. On the other hand for privacy concerns as the data will be released publicly I'd like to make sure the actual IP cannot be retrieved. So I need some one way mapping of the IP addresses to some other strings that ensures 1-1 mapping. If I understand correctly then MD5, SHA1 or SHA256 could be a solution. I wonder if they are not too expensive in terms of processing needed? I'd be interested in any solution though if there is implementation in Perl that would be even better.

    Read the article

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >