Search Results

Search found 11822 results on 473 pages for 'ms word'.

Page 1/473 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• Word 2003 set styles won't convert over when opened in Word 2010

  - by Candy

  If I have set styles in a Word 2003 document, how can I get the set styles to appear when the document is opened in Word 2010? When I open the document that was created using 2003 (that has set custom styles), in 2010 it converts everything to the 2010 styles. When I try selecting Change Styles?Style Set?Word 2003, it doesn’t pick up my custom styles; it only picks up the default 2003 styles. I want to be able to keep my custom styles that were created in the template using 2003.

  Read the article

• Equations saved from Word 2007 for Windows do not appear in Word 2008 for Mac

  - by user36081

  I am a math teacher who uses Word 2008 on the Mac, and I need to collaborate with other teachers who are using Word 2007 under Windows. When they send me a document with mathematical equations in it, I can open it but not see the equations or the document loses formatting such as superscript for exponents. On this page of Known Issues in Word 2008, Microsoft says, Equations saved from Word 2007 for Windows do not appear in Word 2008 for Mac Equations saved in Word 2007 for Windows are not supported in Word 2008 for Mac. The equations will be preserved so that they display correctly in Word 2007, but will appear as placeholders in Word 2008. What can I do to collaborate with users of Word 2007 on mathematical documents?

  Read the article

• Easy Update "Table of Contents" feature in Microsoft Word 2007 VS. Microsoft word 2010

  - by xarzu

  I am currently working on a document that was written using Microsoft Word 2007 and I am also using Microsoft Word 2007 to update the document. It is just the way of the workplace I am now in. I have noticed that the feature of adding nested headers ("subheaders" perhaps) does not work the same as I remember it did with Microsoft Word 2010. Since I am not the original author of the document, I am not sure if the table of contents was set up the right way. So my first question is: How do I see if the table of contents was set up properly in Microsoft Word 2007 to allow automatic updates whenever a subheader is added to the text. There seems to be a number of other things going on with the document that do not seem right. But maybe if we fix this problem first the other issues will dissolve or be lessened.

  Read the article

• Merge table columns in Word 2003 or Word 2010

  - by luvieere

  How can I merge two table columns in Word 2003 or Word 2010?

  Read the article

• Microsoft Word - Word count excluding specific Styles?

  - by Andrew

  Hi, I was wondering if there's a way to get a word count that excludes text with a specific Style in a Microsoft Word 2007 document? I've seen this related question, but I've got blocks of source code scattered throughout which would mean I'd have to go through each of my documents a section at a time.. Does anyone know a way to do this with a macro or a splash of VB Script or some such? Thanks you!

  Read the article

• Changing the font style of line numbers in Microsoft Word 2007

  - by Maxim Z.

  I added line numbers to my document in Microsoft Word 2007. How can I change the font style of these line numbers?

  Read the article

• VLC 2.0.3 on Lubuntu 12.04: No audio?

  - by drezabek

  I am on Lubuntu 12.04, and I have installed VLC media player version 2.0.3. When I try and play an audio file, it appears to load fine, and the media position bar displays the progress, and it says it is playing, but I can't here any thing through my speakers. I can hear game audio, web audio, and audio from SMPlayer just fine, but with VLC, I can't here anything. Below is the "Messages" output with the verbosity option set to "2 (debug)" main debug: processing request item: The Bottom, node: Playlist, skip: 0 main debug: resyncing on The Bottom main debug: The Bottom is at 0 main debug: starting playback of the new playlist item main debug: resyncing on The Bottom main debug: The Bottom is at 0 main debug: creating new input thread main debug: Creating an input for 'The Bottom' main debug: TIMER input launching for 'Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack - 01 The Bottom.flac' : 23.706 ms - Total 23.706 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 23.706 ms) main debug: using timeshift granularity of 50 MiB, in path '/tmp' main debug: `file:///home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack%20-%2001%20The%20Bottom.flac' gives access `file' demux `' path `/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack%20-%2001%20The%20Bottom.flac' main debug: creating demux: access='file' demux='' location='/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack%20-%2001%20The%20Bottom.flac' file='/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack - 01 The Bottom.flac' main debug: looking for access_demux module: 3 candidates main debug: no access_demux module matching "file" could be loaded main debug: TIMER module_need() : 2.332 ms - Total 2.332 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 2.332 ms) main debug: creating access 'file' location='/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack%20-%2001%20The%20Bottom.flac', path='/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack - 01 The Bottom.flac' main debug: looking for access module: 2 candidates filesystem debug: opening file `/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack - 01 The Bottom.flac' main debug: using access module "filesystem" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.762 ms - Total 0.762 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.762 ms) main debug: Using stream method for AStream* main debug: starting pre-buffering main debug: received first data after 0 ms main debug: pre-buffering done 1024 bytes in 0s - 43478 KiB/s main debug: looking for stream_filter module: 7 candidates main debug: no stream_filter module matching "any" could be loaded main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.236 ms - Total 0.236 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.236 ms) main debug: looking for stream_filter module: 1 candidate main debug: using stream_filter module "stream_filter_record" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.156 ms - Total 0.156 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.156 ms) main debug: creating demux: access='file' demux='' location='/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack%20-%2001%20The%20Bottom.flac' file='/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack - 01 The Bottom.flac' main debug: looking for demux module: 54 candidates flacsys debug: Picture type=3 mime=image/png description='' file length=679371 qt4 debug: IM: Setting an input main debug: looking for packetizer module: 21 candidates main debug: using packetizer module "packetizer_flac" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.211 ms - Total 0.211 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.211 ms) main debug: using demux module "flacsys" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 4.023 ms - Total 4.023 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 4.023 ms) main debug: looking for a subtitle file in /home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack/ main debug: looking for meta reader module: 2 candidates main debug: using meta reader module "taglib" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 5.245 ms - Total 5.245 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 5.245 ms) main debug: removing module "taglib" main debug: `file:///home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack%20-%2001%20The%20Bottom.flac' successfully opened main debug: selecting program id=0 main debug: looking for decoder module: 30 candidates main debug: using decoder module "flac" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.442 ms - Total 0.442 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.442 ms) main debug: Buffering 0% flac debug: decode STREAMINFO flac debug: channels:2 samplerate:44100 bitspersamples:16 flac debug: STREAMINFO decoded main debug: Buffering 30% main debug: recycling audio output main debug: looking for audio output module: 3 candidates main debug: Buffering 61% pulse debug: using stereo channel map pulse debug: using library version 1.1.0 pulse debug: (compiled with version 1.1.0, protocol 26) main debug: Buffering 92% main debug: Stream buffering done (371 ms in 2 ms) pulse debug: connected locally to unix:/home/doug/.pulse/dce22254e867f905188a2ce200000003-runtime/native as client #14 pulse debug: using protocol 26, server protocol 26 pulse debug: using buffer metrics: maxlength=4194304, tlength=9880, prebuf=0, minreq=3528 pulse debug: connected to sink 0: alsa_output.pci-0000_00_14.2.analog-stereo main debug: using audio output module "pulse" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 4.571 ms - Total 4.571 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 4.571 ms) main debug: output 's16l' 44100 Hz Stereo frame=1 samples/4 bytes main debug: mixer 'f32l' 44100 Hz Stereo frame=1 samples/8 bytes main debug: filter(s) 'f32l'->'s16l' 44100 Hz->44100 Hz Stereo->Stereo main debug: looking for audio filter module: 14 candidates audio_format debug: f32l->s16l, bits per sample: 32->16 main debug: using audio filter module "audio_format" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.187 ms - Total 0.187 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.187 ms) main debug: conversion pipeline completed main debug: looking for audio mixer module: 2 candidates main debug: using audio mixer module "float32_mixer" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.125 ms - Total 0.125 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.125 ms) main debug: input 's16l' 44100 Hz Stereo frame=1 samples/4 bytes main debug: looking for audio filter module: 1 candidate scaletempo debug: format: 44100 rate, 2 nch, 4 bps, fl32 scaletempo debug: params: 30 stride, 0.200 overlap, 14 search scaletempo debug: 1.000 scale, 1323.000 stride_in, 1323 stride_out, 1059 standing, 264 overlap, 617 search, 2204 queue, fl32 mode main debug: using audio filter module "scaletempo" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.233 ms - Total 0.233 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.233 ms) main debug: filter(s) 's16l'->'f32l' 44100 Hz->44100 Hz Stereo->Stereo pulse debug: listing sink alsa_output.pci-0000_00_14.2.analog-stereo (0): Built-in Audio Analog Stereo main debug: looking for audio filter module: 14 candidates audio_format debug: s16l->f32l, bits per sample: 16->32 main debug: using audio filter module "audio_format" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.147 ms - Total 0.147 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.147 ms) main debug: conversion pipeline completed pulse debug: base volume: 65536 main debug: looking for audio filter module: 1 candidate equalizer debug: equalizer loaded for 44100 Hz with 10 bands 2 pass equalizer debug: 60 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.003013 beta:0.993973 gamma:1.993901 equalizer debug: 170 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.008490 beta:0.983019 gamma:1.982437 equalizer debug: 310 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.015374 beta:0.969252 gamma:1.967331 equalizer debug: 600 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.029328 beta:0.941343 gamma:1.934254 equalizer debug: 1000 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.047918 beta:0.904163 gamma:1.884869 equalizer debug: 3000 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.130408 beta:0.739184 gamma:1.582718 equalizer debug: 6000 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.226555 beta:0.546889 gamma:1.015267 equalizer debug: 12000 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.344937 beta:0.310127 gamma:-0.181410 equalizer debug: 14000 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.366438 beta:0.267123 gamma:-0.521151 equalizer debug: 16000 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.379009 beta:0.241981 gamma:-0.808451 main debug: using audio filter module "equalizer" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.353 ms - Total 0.353 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.353 ms) main debug: filter(s) 'f32l'->'f32l' 44100 Hz->44100 Hz Stereo->Stereo main debug: conversion pipeline completed main debug: looking for visualization2 module: 1 candidate main debug: looking for text renderer module: 2 candidates freetype debug: Building font databases. freetype debug: Took 0 microseconds freetype debug: Using Serif Bold as font from file /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf freetype debug: using fontsize: 2 main debug: using text renderer module "freetype" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 3.278 ms - Total 3.278 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 3.278 ms) main debug: looking for video filter2 module: 18 candidates swscale debug: 32x32 chroma: YUVA -> 16x16 chroma: RGBA with scaling using Bicubic (good quality) main debug: using video filter2 module "swscale" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 1.037 ms - Total 1.037 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 1.037 ms) main debug: looking for video filter2 module: 18 candidates yuvp debug: YUVP to YUVA converter main debug: using video filter2 module "yuvp" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.156 ms - Total 0.156 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.156 ms) main debug: Deinterlacing available main debug: deinterlace 0, mode blend, is_needed 0 main debug: Opening vout display wrapper main debug: looking for vout display module: 6 candidates main debug: looking for vout window xid module: 4 candidates qt4 debug: requesting video... qt4 debug: Video was requested 0, 0 main debug: using vout window xid module "qt4" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 61.671 ms - Total 61.671 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 61.671 ms) main debug: looking for inhibit module: 2 candidates main debug: using inhibit module "xdg_screensaver" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.336 ms - Total 0.336 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.336 ms) xdg_screensaver debug: started xdg-screensaver (PID = 6682) xcb_xv debug: connected to X11.0 server xcb_xv debug: vendor : The X.Org Foundation xcb_xv debug: version: 11103000 xcb_xv debug: using screen 0x15a xcb_xv debug: using XVideo extension v2.2 xcb_xv debug: using adaptor NV17 Video Texture xcb_xv debug: using port 310 xcb_xv debug: using image format 0x30323449 xcb_xv debug: using X11 visual ID 0x21 (depth: 24) xcb_xv debug: using X11 window 0x03400000 xcb_xv debug: using X11 graphic context 0x03400002 main debug: VoutDisplayEvent 'fullscreen' 0 main debug: VoutDisplayEvent 'resize' 800x500 window main debug: using vout display module "xcb_xv" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 69.890 ms - Total 69.890 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 69.890 ms) main debug: original format sz 800x500, of (0,0), vsz 800x500, 4cc I420, sar 1:1, msk r0x0 g0x0 b0x0 main debug: removing module "freetype" main debug: looking for text renderer module: 2 candidates freetype debug: Building font databases. freetype debug: Took 0 microseconds freetype debug: Using Serif Bold as font from file /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf freetype debug: using fontsize: 2 main debug: using text renderer module "freetype" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 4.552 ms - Total 4.552 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 4.552 ms) main debug: using visualization2 module "visual" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 84.104 ms - Total 84.104 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 84.104 ms) main debug: filter(s) 'f32l'->'f32l' 44100 Hz->44100 Hz Stereo->Stereo main debug: conversion pipeline completed main debug: filter(s) 'f32l'->'f32l' 44100 Hz->44100 Hz Stereo->Stereo main debug: conversion pipeline completed main debug: filter(s) 'f32l'->'f32l' 48510 Hz->44100 Hz Stereo->Stereo main debug: looking for audio filter module: 14 candidates main debug: using audio filter module "samplerate" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.375 ms - Total 0.375 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.375 ms) main debug: conversion pipeline completed main debug: End of audio preroll main debug: Decoder buffering done in 91 ms main warning: PTS is out of range (-9269), dropping buffer pulse debug: deferring start (190703 us) main debug: looking for video blending module: 1 candidate main debug: using video blending module "blend" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.275 ms - Total 0.275 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.275 ms) main debug: Detected interlaced video main debug: deinterlace 0, mode blend, is_needed 1 xcb_xv debug: display is visible pulse debug: starting deferred pulse warning: too late by 93760 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44186 Hz pulse debug: started pulse warning: too late by 94474 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44229 Hz pulse warning: too late by 93532 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44272 Hz pulse warning: too late by 92829 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44315 Hz pulse warning: too late by 92132 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44358 Hz xcb_xv debug: display is visible pulse warning: too late by 91534 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44401 Hz xcb_xv debug: display is visible pulse warning: too late by 89482 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44440 Hz xcb_xv debug: display is visible xcb_xv debug: display is visible pulse warning: too late by 87529 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44479 Hz pulse warning: too late by 84577 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44504 Hz main debug: auto hiding mouse cursor pulse warning: too late by 78562 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44492 Hz pulse warning: too late by 68015 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44422 Hz xcb_xv debug: display is visible xcb_xv debug: display is visible xcb_xv debug: display is visible xcb_xv debug: display is visible main debug: auto hiding mouse cursor pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44336 Hz xcb_xv debug: display is visible xcb_xv debug: display is visible xcb_xv debug: display is visible main debug: auto hiding mouse cursor I have had issues with VLC in the past- the audio quality was extremely crackly, as if the headphone jack was plugged in only half way, and the sounds were extremely sharp and caused my speakers to make a ringing/vibrating noise... It would eventually start working after I messed around with the audio settings, but it happened every restart. I eventually switched to SMPlayer, but now I need some of the features that VLC offers, but I still can't use VLC. At this point, the audio can not be heard at all, and the method I used before, messing around with the audio settings, isn't getting me anywhere. (note, I reposted this on VideoLan's forums, link is here: http://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=104726) Please let me know if you need more information, or are confused by something I posted! Thanks!

  Read the article

• Letter and word spacing decreases in Word 2010

  - by user766850

  I checked the font menu and everything is default. Whenever I open a document, all letters are closer to each other than they should be and all words are farther than they should be. Even the documents look normal in other computers are looks this way in my comptuer. I added an image for showing the problem. First part is what it should be and second part is what I get. What could e the problem? I also checked options page but I couldn't find something related.

  Read the article

• Get rid of gray brackets arond editable text in restricted Word docs

  - by Brendan

  I'm trying to work out a problem in Word that I thought was simply a glitch from 2003 until we upgraded to 2010 and the problem persisted. For our corporate letterhead, we set up the template with placeholder text, highlight the text, and then make the document read-only with the exception of the selected text. The editable text turns yellow and gains these brackets around them: Once these brackets appear, they'll always show on the screen. That I can handle, though I'd like to learn how to hide them on-screen if that's possible. When the document is printed while protected, it works fine. When the document is printed while NOT protected, part of the bracket shows up on the paper! I guess the ultimate question is, how can I get rid of the brackets altogether? I can see why they exist but in my use case they create more problems than they solve. I'd like someone to be able to read the doc without seeing brackets, and I'd like other people in my department to be able to print without having to re-restrict it first. I tried to turn off bookmarks because that's what seemed to come up when I searched around, but that didn't do anything.

  Read the article

• SQLAuthority News – MS Access Database is the Way to Go – April 1st Humor

  - by pinaldave

  First of all, today is April 1- April Fool’s Day, so I have written this post for some light entertainment. My friend has just sent me an email about why a person should go for Access Database. For a short background, I used to be an MS Access user once (I will not call myself MS Access DBA), and I must say I had a good time with Database at that time. As time passed by, I moved from MS Access to SQL Server. Well, as for my friend’s email, his reasons considering MS Access usage really made me laugh. MS Access may have a few points where it totally makes sense to use it. However, in the email that I received, there was not a single reason which was valid.  In fact, I thought it is an April 1st joke- just delivered a little earlier. Let us see some of the reasons from that email. Thanks to Mahesh Bhesania for sending this email to me. MS Access comes with lots of free stuff, e.g. MS Excel MS Access is the most preferred desktop database system MS Access can import data from MS Excel and SQL Server MS Access provides a real time database MS Access has a free IDE-to-VB Script MS Access fits well in your hard drive I actually think that the above points are either incorrect beliefs of some users, or someone just wrote them to give some laughter with such inaccurate data. And, for the same reason I decided to browse the Internet and do some research on MS Access database to verify my thoughts. While searching on this subject, I found the following two interesting statements from the site: Microsoft Access Database, Why Choose It? Other software manufacturers are more likely to provide interfaces to MS Access than any other desktop database system Microsoft Access consulting rates are typically lower for Access consultants compared to Oracle or SQL Server consultants The second one is may be the worst reason for you to switch to MS Access if you are already an SQL Server consultant. With this cartoon, have you ever felt like you were one of these chickens at some point in time? I guess that the moment might have just happened before the minute we say “I guess we were on the same page?” Does this mean we are IN the same table, or ON the same table?! (I accept bad joke!) It is All Fools’ Day after all, so just laugh! If you have something funny but non-offensive to share, just  leave your comment here. Reference: Pinal Dave (http://blog.SQLAuthority.com), Cartoon source unknown. Filed under: Software Development, SQL, SQL Authority, SQL Humor, SQL Query, SQL Server, SQL Tips and Tricks, SQLAuthority News, T SQL, Technology Tagged: MS ACCESS

  Read the article

• Word 2007 COM - Can't directly access a page when word is set to invisible

  - by Robbie

  I'm using Word 2007 via COM from PHP 5.2 Apache 2.0 on a windows machine. The goal is to programmatically render jpeg thumbnails from each page in a Word document. The following code works correctly if you set $word-Visible to 1: try { $word = new COM('word.application'); $word->Visible = 0; $word->Documents->Open("C:\\test.doc"); echo "Number of pages: " . $word->ActiveDocument->ActiveWindow->ActivePane->Pages->Count() . "</br>"; $i = 1; foreach ($word->ActiveDocument->ActiveWindow->ActivePane->Pages as $page) { echo "Page number: $i </br>"; $i++; } //get the EMF image of the page $data = $word->ActiveDocument->ActiveWindow->ActivePane->Pages->Item(3)->EnhMetaFileBits; $word->ActiveDocument->Close(); $word->Quit(); } catch (Exception $e) { echo "Exception: " .$e->getMessage(); } The test document I'm using contains 35 pages. The code will display the correct number of pages but the for each loop only loops over 1 page. I can only directly access page 1 and 2 in the Pages-Item() collection. If I try to access another page I get the exception: "The requested member of the collection does not exist." If I set the $word-Visible property to 1 I do get all the pages in the foreach loop and I can access any page directly. Everything is working as expected if Word is set to be visible. Even stranger is the fact that if I set Word to be invisible and I don't have the foreach loop I can only access page 1 instead of page 1 and 2 if I do the for each loop. Any pointers on how I can access all the pages in the document and keeping word invisible?

  Read the article

• MS-DOS 6.22 keyboard configuration

  - by AlexV

  I have MS-DOS 6.22 in a virtual machine (Virtual PC 2007) and I wanted to properly configure the keyboard. The keyboard I have is a French-Canadian one (FYI in Windows XP my keyboard is labeled "Français (Canada) - Français (Canada)" in the control pannel). What do I need to put in autoexec.bat and config.sys in order to use the keyboard properly (Windows 3.11 will be installed later if it matters)? I haven't configured DOS since like 14 years so all my references are lost/trashed now :)

  Read the article

• Create Chemistry Equations and Diagrams in Word

  - by Matthew Guay

  Microsoft Word is a great tool for formatting text, but what if you want to insert a chemistry formula or diagram?  Thanks to a new free add-in for Word, you can now insert high-quality chemistry formulas and diagrams directly from the Ribbon in Word. Microsoft’s new Education Labs has recently released the new Chemistry Add-in for Word 2007 and 2010.  This free download adds support for entering and editing chemistry symbols, diagrams, and formulas using the standard XML based Chemical Markup Language.  You can convert any chemical name, such as benzene, or formula, such as H2O, into a chemical diagram, standard name, or formula.  Whether you’re a professional chemist, just taking chemistry in school, or simply curious about the makeup of Citric Acid, this add-in is an exciting way to bring chemistry to your computer. This add-in works great on Word 2007 and 2010, including the 64 bit version of Word 2010.  Please note that the current version is still in beta, so only run it if you are comfortable running beta products. Getting Started Download the Chemistry add-in from Microsoft Education Labs (link below), and unzip the file.  Then, run the ChemistryAddinforWordBeta2.Setup.msi. It may inform you that you need to install the Visual Studio Tools for Office 3.0.  Simply click Yes to download these tools. This will open the download in your default browser.  Simply click run, or save and then run it when it is downloaded. Now, click next to install the Visual Studio Tools for Office as usual. When this is finished, run the ChemistryAddinforWordBeta2.Setup.msi again.  This time, you can easily install it with the default options. Once it’s finished installing, open Word to try out the Chemistry Add-in.  You will be asked if you want to install this customization, so click Install to enable it. Now you will have a new Chemistry tab in your Word ribbon.  Here’s the ribbon in Word 2010… And here it is in Word 2007.   Using the Chemistry Add-in It’s very easy to insert nice chemistry diagrams and formulas in Word with the Chemistry add-in.  You can quickly insert a premade diagram from the Chemistry Gallery: Or you can insert a formula from file.  Simply click “From File” and choose any Chemical Markup Language (.cml) formatted file to insert the chemical formula. You can also convert any chemical name to it’s chemical form.  Simply select the word, right-click, select “Convert to Chemistry Zone” and then click on its name. Now you can see the chemical form in the sidebar if you click the Chemistry Navigator button, and can choose to insert the diagram into the document.  Some chemicals will automatically convert to the diagram in the document, while others simply link to it in the sidebar.  Either way, you can display exactly what you want. You can also convert a chemical formula directly to it’s chemical diagram.  Here we entered H2O and converted it to Chemistry Zone: This directly converted it to the diagram directly in the document. You can click the Edit button on the top, and from there choose to either edit the 2D model of the chemical, or edit the labels. When you click Edit Labels, you may be asked which form you wish to display.  Here’s the options for potassium permanganate: You can then edit the names and formulas, and add or remove any you wish. If you choose to edit the chemical in 2D, you can even edit the individual atoms and change the chemical you’re diagramming.  This 2D editor has a lot of options, so you can get your chemical diagram to look just like you want. And, if you need any help or want to learn more about the Chemistry add-in and its features, simply click the help button in the Chemistry Ribbon.  This will open a Word document containing examples and explanations which can be helpful in mastering all the features of this add-in. All of this works perfectly, whether you’re running it in Word 2007 or 2010, 32 or 64 bit editions. Conclusion Whether you’re using chemistry formulas everyday or simply want to investigate a chemical makeup occasionally, this is a great way to do it with tools you already have on your computer.  It will also help make homework a bit easier if you’re struggling with it in high school or college. Links Download the Chemistry Add-in for Word Introducing Chemistry Add-in for Word – MSDN blogs Chemistry Markup Language – Wikipedia Similar Articles Productive Geek Tips Geek Reviews: Using Dia as a Free Replacement for Microsoft VisioEasily Summarize A Word 2007 DocumentCreate a Hyperlink in a Word 2007 Flow Chart and Hide Annoying ScreenTipsHow To Create and Publish Blog Posts in Word 2010 & 2007Using Word 2007 as a Blogging Tool TouchFreeze Alternative in AutoHotkey The Icy Undertow Desktop Windows Home Server – Backup to LAN The Clear & Clean Desktop Use This Bookmarklet to Easily Get Albums Use AutoHotkey to Assign a Hotkey to a Specific Window Latest Software Reviews Tinyhacker Random Tips Revo Uninstaller Pro Registry Mechanic 9 for Windows PC Tools Internet Security Suite 2010 PCmover Professional Windows 7 Easter Theme YoWindoW, a real time weather screensaver Optimize your computer the Microsoft way Stormpulse provides slick, real time weather data Geek Parents – Did you try Parental Controls in Windows 7? Change DNS servers on the fly with DNS Jumper

  Read the article

• Unable to open word file (MSWord 2007) when word automation program is running

  - by sankaran

  In my application i am using word automation to get the text content from the file. It is working fine no issues. But at the instant when word automation is processing, if i open the word file, it is throwing a dialog with message (any file) "This file is in use by another application or user. (C:\User\xyz\AppData...\Normal.dotm)". When close the dialog, it asking for save the file "normal.dotm"...template file. This happens only in MSWord 2007 not in MSWord 2003. can any one tell the solution please.

  Read the article

• How To Remove Hyperlinks from Microsoft Word Documents

  - by Mysticgeek

  Sometimes when you copy text from a webpage and paste it into Word, it can be annoying when the hyperlinks transfer with it. Today we take a look at how to easily remove the hyperlinks if you don’t want them in the document. Here we will cover a few different ways you can remove hyperlinks from emails or webpage data that you enter into a Word document using Paste Special and Keyboard Shortcuts. Remove Hyperlinks in Word Using Paste Special In Word 2010 we copied part of an article from How-To Geek, as you can see the hyperlinks were copied into the document as well. To remove the hyperlinks right-click on the document and you’ll see three icons under Paste Options. We want to select the third one to the right which is Keep Text Only…the text in in the document changes so you can get a preview of how it will look. After selecting Keep Text Only, you can see the hyperlinks have been removed. However, you’ll need to change the fonts and other layouts if you’re not happy with the default of Calibri. In Office 2007 under the Home tab click the dropdown menu under Paste and select Paste Special. In the Paste Special screen select Unformatted Text then click OK. In Office 2003 copy the text into the document, hover your mouse over the clipboard, click the dropdown menu, then select Keep Text Only. Keyboard Ninja Style If you’re a Keyboard Ninja, an easy way to remove all hyperlinks is to use “Ctrl+A” to select everything, then use the key combination “Ctrl+Shift+F9”…We tested this key combination and it works in Word 2003-2010. This will remove all of the hyperlinks and keep the original format of the text. Conclusion There are several different ways to get rid of hyperlinks in text pasted into Word documents. The method you use will depend on your preference and the version of Word you’re using…but the “Ctrl+Shift+F9” keyboard shortcut works in all versions of Word and might be the easiest way. If you always want just text in Word 2007, you can disable automatically disable them. If you have a different method you use to remove hyperlinks from Word documents, leave a comment and let us know! Similar Articles Productive Geek Tips Preview Documents Without Opening Them In Word 2007Embed True Type Fonts in Word and PowerPoint 2007 DocumentsAdd Background Color To Word 2007 DocumentsUse Image Placeholders to Display Documents Faster in WordHow To Make Sure Word Prints Document Backgrounds TouchFreeze Alternative in AutoHotkey The Icy Undertow Desktop Windows Home Server – Backup to LAN The Clear & Clean Desktop Use This Bookmarklet to Easily Get Albums Use AutoHotkey to Assign a Hotkey to a Specific Window Latest Software Reviews Tinyhacker Random Tips DVDFab 6 Revo Uninstaller Pro Registry Mechanic 9 for Windows PC Tools Internet Security Suite 2010 Gadfly is a cool Twitter/Silverlight app Enable DreamScene in Windows 7 Microsoft’s “How Do I ?” Videos Home Networks – How do they look like & the problems they cause Check Your IMAP Mail Offline In Thunderbird Follow Finder Finds You Twitter Users To Follow

  Read the article

• How to avoid the configuring ms office dialog box

  - by user23950

  I always see the configuring ms office with a an endless progress bar, 2 or more weeks after I installed ms office(2000, 2003, 2010 beta). I'm not exactly sure what it is called but it is trying to configure ms office.Or maybe repairing the installation. And it sucks because when I need to access ms word NOW, I can only see that box with the progress bar. And when I press cancel, it won't open ms word, or maybe the whole suite(ms word, powerpoint, excel) What might be a possible solution to this?anyone here who has encountered it before

  Read the article

• Is there a way to convert MS 2010 Equation to Object in MS Equation 3.0?

  - by Teodorescu

  I have a lot of equations (for faculty) written in MS Equation (button from right side) and saved it in .docx format. All good and the best until my professor told me that he has MS 2003 and I have to convert from docx to doc format and the equations must be editable. I don't have enough time to rewrite all the equations in MS Equation 3.0. Is there a way to convert from MS Equation to MS Equation 3.0 Object to be recognized and editable in Word 2003?

  Read the article

• Help analyzing traceroute

  - by Abdulla

  Hello, my name is Abdulla and I'm from Kuwait. Sorry for my question as I know its not technically challenging. I'm facing some problems with my internet connection. My company has a DSL 2mb connection. My main problem is latency, in the morning its good but after that its gets really bad. My Internet provider says there's nothing wrong and that everything is working perfectly. I tried to explain to them the latency issue but they say that as long as I'm getting the download speed there isn't anything I can do about it. I only want to know if this is true and that the company can't do anything before I change my internet provider, as I feel that the guys at the contact center might getting back to me without asking tech support. Below are 2 traces I made, one in the morning and the other in the afternoon: This was taken around 17:00 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com Pinging google.com [66.102.9.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=387ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=388ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.104: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 375ms, Maximum = 388ms, Average = 381ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com /t Pinging google.com [66.102.9.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=376ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=382ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=371ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=378ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=374ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=371ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=366ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=353ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=331ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=348ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=346ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=335ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=340ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=344ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=332ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=326ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=325ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=338ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=341ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.104: Packets: Sent = 26, Received = 26, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 325ms, Maximum = 382ms, Average = 348ms Control-C ^C C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>travert google.com 'travert' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert google.com Tracing route to google.com [66.102.9.104] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 80-184-31-1.adsl.kems.net [80.184.31.1] 3 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms 168.187.0.226 4 7 ms 8 ms 9 ms 168.187.0.125 5 180 ms 187 ms 188 ms if-11-2.core1.RSD-Riyad.as6453.net [116.0.78.89] 6 209 ms 222 ms 204 ms 195.219.167.57 7 541 ms 536 ms 540 ms 195.219.167.42 8 553 ms 552 ms 538 ms Vlan1102.icore1.PVU-Paris.as6453.net [195.219.24 1.109] 9 547 ms 543 ms 542 ms xe-9-1-0.edge4.paris1.level3.net [4.68.110.213] 10 540 ms 523 ms 531 ms ae-33-51.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net [4.69.139.193] 11 755 ms 761 ms 695 ms ae-45-45.ebr1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.143.101] 12 271 ms 263 ms 400 ms ae-11-51.car1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.139.66] 13 701 ms 730 ms 742 ms 195.50.118.210 14 659 ms 641 ms 660 ms 209.85.255.76 15 280 ms 283 ms 292 ms 209.85.251.190 16 308 ms 293 ms 296 ms 72.14.232.239 17 679 ms 700 ms 721 ms 64.233.174.18 18 268 ms 281 ms 269 ms lm-in-f104.1e100.net [66.102.9.104] Trace complete. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator> This was taken at 10:00am Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com Pinging google.com [66.102.9.106] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.106: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 110ms, Maximum = 120ms, Average = 113ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com /t Pinging google.com [66.102.9.106] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.106: Packets: Sent = 32, Received = 32, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 109ms, Maximum = 135ms, Average = 112ms Control-C ^C C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert google.com Tracing route to google.com [66.102.9.104] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 80-184-31-1.adsl.kems.net [80.184.31.1] 3 8 ms 7 ms 6 ms 168.187.0.226 4 6 ms 7 ms 7 ms 168.187.0.125 5 20 ms 20 ms 18 ms if-11-2.core1.RSD-Riyad.as6453.net [116.0.78.89] 6 171 ms 205 ms 215 ms 195.219.167.57 7 191 ms 215 ms 226 ms 195.219.167.42 8 * 103 ms 94 ms Vlan1102.icore1.PVU-Paris.as6453.net [195.219.24 1.109] 9 94 ms 95 ms 97 ms xe-9-1-0.edge4.paris1.level3.net [4.68.110.213] 10 94 ms 94 ms 94 ms ae-33-51.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net [4.69.139.193] 11 101 ms 101 ms 101 ms ae-48-48.ebr1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.143.113] 12 102 ms 102 ms 101 ms ae-11-51.car1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.139.66] 13 103 ms 102 ms 103 ms 195.50.118.210 14 137 ms 103 ms 100 ms 209.85.255.76 15 130 ms 124 ms 124 ms 209.85.251.190 16 114 ms 116 ms 116 ms 72.14.232.239 17 135 ms 113 ms 126 ms 64.233.174.18 18 126 ms 125 ms 127 ms lm-in-f104.1e100.net [66.102.9.104] Trace complete. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>

  Read the article

• Why does traceroute take much longer than ping?

  - by PHP

  How to explain this? C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert google.com Tracing route to google.com [64.233.189.104] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 7 ms <1 ms <1 ms reserve.cableplus.com.cn [218.242.223.209] 3 108 ms 135 ms 163 ms 211.154.70.10 4 * * * Request timed out. 5 2 ms * 1 ms 211.154.64.114 6 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 211.154.72.185 7 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 202.96.222.77 8 2 ms 1 ms 2 ms 61.152.81.145 9 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms 61.152.86.54 10 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 202.97.33.238 11 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 202.97.33.54 12 2 ms 1 ms 2 ms 202.97.33.5 13 33 ms 33 ms 33 ms 202.97.61.50 14 34 ms 34 ms 34 ms 202.97.62.214 15 34 ms 186 ms 37 ms 209.85.241.56 16 35 ms 35 ms 44 ms 66.249.94.34 17 34 ms 34 ms 34 ms hkg01s01-in-f104.1e100.net [64.233.189.104] Trace complete. So average time should be :1+7+108+2+1+1+2+1+1+2+2+33+34+34+35+34+34+35+34,which is a lot bigger than ping C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com Pinging google.com [64.233.189.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=241 Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=241 Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=241 Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=241 Ping statistics for 64.233.189.104: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 34ms, Maximum = 34ms, Average = 34ms

  Read the article

• Please bear with me, can someone analyze this trace route please

  - by Abdulla

  Hello, my name is Abdulla and I'm from Kuwait. Sorry for my question as I know its not technically challenging. I'm facing some problems with my internet connection while gaming, I have DSL 2mb connection. My main problem is latency, in the morning its good but after that its gets really bad. My internet provider says there's nothing wrong and that everything is working perfectly. I tried to explain to them the latency issue but they say that as long as I'm getting the download speed there isn't anything I can do about it. I only want to know if this is true and that the company can't do anything before I change my internet provider, as I feel that the guys at the contact center might getting back to me without asking tech support. Below are 2 traces I made, one in the morning and the other in the afternoon: This was taken around 17:00 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com Pinging google.com [66.102.9.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=387ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=388ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.104: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 375ms, Maximum = 388ms, Average = 381ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com /t Pinging google.com [66.102.9.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=376ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=382ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=371ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=378ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=374ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=371ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=366ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=353ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=331ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=348ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=346ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=335ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=340ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=344ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=332ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=326ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=325ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=338ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=341ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.104: Packets: Sent = 26, Received = 26, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 325ms, Maximum = 382ms, Average = 348ms Control-C ^C C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>travert google.com 'travert' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert google.com Tracing route to google.com [66.102.9.104] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 80-184-31-1.adsl.kems.net [80.184.31.1] 3 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms 168.187.0.226 4 7 ms 8 ms 9 ms 168.187.0.125 5 180 ms 187 ms 188 ms if-11-2.core1.RSD-Riyad.as6453.net [116.0.78.89] 6 209 ms 222 ms 204 ms 195.219.167.57 7 541 ms 536 ms 540 ms 195.219.167.42 8 553 ms 552 ms 538 ms Vlan1102.icore1.PVU-Paris.as6453.net [195.219.24 1.109] 9 547 ms 543 ms 542 ms xe-9-1-0.edge4.paris1.level3.net [4.68.110.213] 10 540 ms 523 ms 531 ms ae-33-51.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net [4.69.139.193] 11 755 ms 761 ms 695 ms ae-45-45.ebr1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.143.101] 12 271 ms 263 ms 400 ms ae-11-51.car1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.139.66] 13 701 ms 730 ms 742 ms 195.50.118.210 14 659 ms 641 ms 660 ms 209.85.255.76 15 280 ms 283 ms 292 ms 209.85.251.190 16 308 ms 293 ms 296 ms 72.14.232.239 17 679 ms 700 ms 721 ms 64.233.174.18 18 268 ms 281 ms 269 ms lm-in-f104.1e100.net [66.102.9.104] Trace complete. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator> This was taken at 10:00am Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com Pinging google.com [66.102.9.106] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.106: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 110ms, Maximum = 120ms, Average = 113ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com /t Pinging google.com [66.102.9.106] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.106: Packets: Sent = 32, Received = 32, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 109ms, Maximum = 135ms, Average = 112ms Control-C ^C C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert google.com Tracing route to google.com [66.102.9.104] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 80-184-31-1.adsl.kems.net [80.184.31.1] 3 8 ms 7 ms 6 ms 168.187.0.226 4 6 ms 7 ms 7 ms 168.187.0.125 5 20 ms 20 ms 18 ms if-11-2.core1.RSD-Riyad.as6453.net [116.0.78.89] 6 171 ms 205 ms 215 ms 195.219.167.57 7 191 ms 215 ms 226 ms 195.219.167.42 8 * 103 ms 94 ms Vlan1102.icore1.PVU-Paris.as6453.net [195.219.24 1.109] 9 94 ms 95 ms 97 ms xe-9-1-0.edge4.paris1.level3.net [4.68.110.213] 10 94 ms 94 ms 94 ms ae-33-51.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net [4.69.139.193] 11 101 ms 101 ms 101 ms ae-48-48.ebr1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.143.113] 12 102 ms 102 ms 101 ms ae-11-51.car1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.139.66] 13 103 ms 102 ms 103 ms 195.50.118.210 14 137 ms 103 ms 100 ms 209.85.255.76 15 130 ms 124 ms 124 ms 209.85.251.190 16 114 ms 116 ms 116 ms 72.14.232.239 17 135 ms 113 ms 126 ms 64.233.174.18 18 126 ms 125 ms 127 ms lm-in-f104.1e100.net [66.102.9.104] Trace complete. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>

  Read the article

• Word 2010 does not save as Word 2003 XML

  - by Peter

  I have a document which was created in Word 2010, but for use in a particular application, it needs to be saved in Word 2003 XML format. When I try the normal "Save as" via the File menu (choosing Word 2003 XML format to save as), Word 2010 thinks for a while, and then presents the "Save as" dialog to me again, suggesting that I save the document as .docx. Trying to get around this, I saved the document as .doc (i.e. Word 97-2003 document). This worked fine. But when I try to save this .doc file as Word 2003 XML, again Word 2010 thinks for a while, and then presents the "Save as" dialog, suggesting this time that I save the document as .doc. Oh, and I need to say that this only happens on a specific document - all others work fine. I know I should try a process of elimination and see what is causing the symptoms, but it would nice to have an answer "in principle". Is there perhaps a setting somewhere that I have enable? Does anyone know what's going on here?

  Read the article

• Change the Default Font Size in Word

  - by Matthew Guay

  Are you frustrated by always having to change the font size before you create a document it Word?  Here’s how you can end that frustration and set your favorite default font size for once and for all! Microsoft changed the default font font to 11 point Calibri in Word 2007 after years of 12 point Times New Roman being the default.  Although it can be easily overlooked, there are ways in Word to change the default settings to anything you want.  Whether you want to change your default to 12 point Calibri or to 48 point Comic Sans…here’s how to change your default font settings in Word 2007 and 2010. Changing Default Fonts in Word To change the default font settings, click the small box with an arrow in the right left corner of the Font section of the Home tab in the Ribbon.   In the Font dialog box, choose the default font settings you want.  Notice in the Font box it says “+Body”; this means that the font will be chosen by the document style you choose, and you are only selecting the default font style and size.  So, if your style uses Calibri, then your font will be Calibri at the size and style you chose.  If you’d prefer to choose a specific font to be the default, just select one from the drop-down box and this selection will override the font selection in your document style. Here we left all the default settings, except we selected 12 point font in the Latin text box (this is your standard body text; users of Asian languages such as Chinese may see a box for Asian languages).  When you’ve made your selections, click the “Set as Default” button in the bottom left corner of the dialog. You will be asked to confirm that you want these settings to be made default.  In Word 2010, you will be given the option to set these settings for this document only or for all documents.  Click the bullet beside “All documents based on the Normal.dotm template?”, and then click Ok. In Word 2007, simply click Ok to save these settings as default. Now, whenever you open Word or create a new document, your default font settings should be set exactly to what you want.  And simply repeat these steps to change your default font settings again if you want. Editing your default template file Another way to change your default font settings is to edit your Normal.dotm file.  This file is what Word uses to create new documents; it basically copies the formatting in this document each time you make a new document. To edit your Normal.dotm file, enter the following in the address bar in Explorer or in the Run prompt: %appdata%\Microsoft\Templates This will open your Office Templates folder.  Right-click on the Normal.dotm file, and click Open to edit it.  Note: Do not double-click on the file, as this will only create a new document based on Normal.dotm and any edits you make will not be saved in this file.   Now, change any font settings as you normally would.  Remember: anything you change or enter in this document will appear in any new document you create using Word. If you want to revert to your default settings, simply delete your Normal.dotm file.  Word will recreate it with the standard default settings the next time you open Word. Please Note: Changing your default font size will not change the font size in existing documents, so these will still show the settings you used when these documents were created.  Also, some addins can affect your Normal.dotm template.  If Word does not seem to remember your font settings, try disabling Word addins to see if this helps. Conclusion Sometimes it’s the small things that can be the most frustrating.  Getting your default font settings the way you want is a great way to take away a frustration and make you more productive. And here’s a quick question: Do you prefer the new default 11 point Calibri, or do you prefer 12 point Times New Roman or some other combination?  Sound off in the comments, and let the world know your favorite font settings. Similar Articles Productive Geek Tips Change the Default Font in Excel 2007Add Emphasis to Paragraphs with Drop Caps in Word 2007Keep Websites From Using Tiny Fonts in SafariMake Word 2007 Always Save in Word 2003 FormatStupid Geek Tricks: Enable More Fonts for the Windows Command Prompt TouchFreeze Alternative in AutoHotkey The Icy Undertow Desktop Windows Home Server – Backup to LAN The Clear & Clean Desktop Use This Bookmarklet to Easily Get Albums Use AutoHotkey to Assign a Hotkey to a Specific Window Latest Software Reviews Tinyhacker Random Tips DVDFab 6 Revo Uninstaller Pro Registry Mechanic 9 for Windows PC Tools Internet Security Suite 2010 Spyware Blaster v4.3 Yes, it’s Patch Tuesday Generate Stunning Tag Clouds With Tagxedo Install, Remove and HIDE Fonts in Windows 7 Need Help with Your Home Network? Awesome Lyrics Finder for Winamp & Windows Media Player

  Read the article

• Windows 7 - traceroute hop with high latency! [closed]

  - by Mac

  I've been experiencing this problem for quite a while, and it's quite frustrating. I'll do a traceroute, to www.l.google.com, for example. This is the result (please note: I will replace some parts of personal information with text - i.e. ISP.IP is in reality an actual IP address, and ISPNAME replaces the actual ISP name): Tracing route to www.l.google.com [173.194.34.212] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 9 ms 8 ms 10 ms ISP.EXCHANGE.NAME [ISP.IP.172.205] 3 161 ms 171 ms 177 ms host-ISP.IP.215.246.ISPNAME.net [ISP.IP.215.246] 4 12 ms 9 ms 10 ms host-ISP.IP.215.246.ISPNAME.net [ISP.IP.215.246] 5 10 ms 9 ms 17 ms host-ISP.IP.224.165.ISPNAME.net [ISP.IP.224.165] 6 10 ms 9 ms 10 ms 10.42.0.3 7 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms host-ISP.IP.202.129.ISPNAME.net [ISP.IP.202.129] 8 10 ms 9 ms 9 ms host-ISP.IP.209.33.ISPNAME.net [ISP.IP.209.33] 9 77 ms 129 ms 164 ms host-ISP.IP.198.162.ISPNAME.net [ISP.IP.198.162] 10 43 ms 42 ms 43 ms 72.14.212.13 11 42 ms 42 ms 42 ms 209.85.252.36 12 59 ms 59 ms 59 ms 209.85.241.210 13 60 ms 76 ms 68 ms 72.14.237.124 14 59 ms 59 ms 58 ms mad01s08-in-f20.1e100.net [173.194.34.212] Trace complete. Notice that there is a spike on the 3rd hop, but also notice that the 3rd and 4th hop are to the exact same destination. Furthermore, when I ping the offended hop separately, I get the low latency I would expect to that server: Pinging ISP.IP.215.246 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253 Ping statistics for ISP.IP.215.246: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 9ms, Maximum = 12ms, Average = 9ms I'm baffled as to why or how this is happening, and it seems to "fix itself" at random times. Here is an example of where it was working as expected: http://i.imgur.com/bysno.png Notice how many fewer hops were taken. Please note that all the posted results occurred within 10 minutes of testing. I've tried contacting my ISP, and they seem clueless; in their eyes, as long as "the download speed is not slow", then they're doing everything right. Any insight would be very much appreciated, and thanks in advanced!

  Read the article

• MS Word - Close Word when you close the last open document **using keyboard**

  - by Chad

  In MS Word, by default, you can use: Ctrl+F4 to close Word Ctrl+W to close the current document Is it possible to make Word close when you close the last open document? For instance, in Chrome, if you keep hitting Ctrl+W you'll eventually close the last tab, which will also close Chrome. I'd like the same functionality with Word (and the other Office products) where I can just keep closing documents until I close the last one, at which point the application closes. Unfortunately, Ctrl+W doesn't close Word, even when there are no documents open.

  Read the article

• Word 2013 can't compare readonly files

  - by Moshe Katz

  I am using Tortoise SVN to work with a repository that contains some documentation saved as Word documents. On my old computer, with Office 2010, I was able to compare with previous revisions. Tortoise would open Word in compare view so I could see the differences between the files. I have installed Office 2013 (final version from Technet, not the preview version) on my new laptop for testing and now I can no longer compare Word Documents. Tortoise pops up a generic error that it was unable to compare the two files. Tortoise uses a JScript file to interface with Word, so I ran that file through a debugger and found that the actual error is: The Compare method or property is not available because this command is not available for reading. Some Googling followed by some testing revealed that the error is caused by the first file opened (in this case, the previous version) being opened as Read-Only. If I change the JScript code to open in normal mode, and I find the file on the system and un-check the "Read Only" property (if necessary), then the comparison opens as expected. I was unable to find any documentation about this change to Word on any Microsoft site. Does anyone know why this has been changed, and if it is intentional and not a bug, what the benefit is of requiring the file to be writable in order to compare it with another? Note: This is tagged word-2013-preview but it is actually for the release version of Word that is available on MSDN and Technet. I do not have enough rep. on this site to create new tags (yet).

  Read the article

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >