Search Results

Search found 25362 results on 1015 pages for 'compiling from source'.

Page 10/1015 | < Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >

  • How do you go about checking your open source libraries for keystroke loggers?

    - by asd
    A random person on the internet told me that a technology was secure(1), safe to use and didn't contain keyloggers because it is open source. While I can trivially detect the key stroke logger in this open source application, what can developers(2) do to protect themselves against rouge committers to open source projects? Doing a back of the envelope threat analysis, if I were a rogue developer, I'd fork a branch on git and promote it's download since it would have twitter support (and a secret key stroke logger). If it was an SVN repo, I'd create just create a new project. Even better would be to put the malicious code in the automatic update routines. (1) I won't mention which because I can only deal with one kind of zealot at a time. (2) Ordinary users are at the mercy of their virus and malware detection software-- it's absurd to expect grandma to read the source of code of their open source word processor's source code to find the keystroke logger.

    Read the article

  • Can I use the test suite from an open source project to verify that my own 'compatible library' is compatible?

    - by Mark Booth
    The question Is it illegal to rewrite every line of an open source project in a slightly different way, and use it in a closed source project? makes me wonder what would be considered a clean-room implementation in the era of open source projects. Hypothetically, if I were to develop a library which duplicates the publicly documented interface of an open-source library, without ever looking at the source code for that library, could that code ever be considered a derivative work? Obviously it would need the same class hierarchy and method signatures, so that it could be a drop-in replacement - could that in itself, be enough to provoke a copyright claim? What about if I used the test suite of the open source project to verify whether my clean implementation behaved in the same way as the original library? Would using the test suite be enough to dirty my clean code? As should be expected from a question like this, I am not looking for specific legal advice, but looking to document experiences people may have had with this sort of issue.

    Read the article

  • Compiling Qt for Windows 98

    - by wrp
    I need to support Windows 98. The Qt documentation claims this is possible, but there are no instructions. The distributed binaries don't run on Win98 and the majority of Qt applications I have sampled also don't. For several apps that do run on 98, I have asked authors how they did it, but the common answer is that it was accidental and they don't know what factors caused it. In searching the forums for help, I found only guesses that turned out to be wrong. For example, one belief is that to compile for Win9x, you must build the tools and the apps on that platform. Yet, things I found to run were built on newer versions of Windows. What is required to build the Qt dev tools and then applications for Win98? How about cross-compiling from WinXP or Linux? Are there specific components that can't be made to run on Win98? Are there particular difficulties with dynamic or static linking for Win98 support?

    Read the article

  • How to learn about Make, compiling

    - by drozzy
    Why is Make utility for installing stuff on Linux so complicated? I mean it is really hard to know exactly where stuff goes on the machine. /etc/local? usr local? non-local? It just seems like really chaotic directory structure. Is there some "guide" on how this works? I mean as a new programmer, coming into the world of compiling things - where does on start? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How Have You Implemented Open Source Contributions At Your Company?

    - by Travis
    Ok guys, I know others have asked this question in a similar manner in the past, but I want to go beyond the theoretical and find out answers from people who have worked in an environment that relied heavily upon open source technology and never contributed anything back to the open source community, and was able to convince the boss / owner to contribute back to the open source community. I know alot of the standard answers, but I'm looking for some more practical information? What was the key argument, that changed the culture in your company, and how has it changed?

    Read the article

  • Haskell's cabal dependency problem with happy

    - by wirrbel
    I have problems installing ghc-mod on my linux machine. cabal worries about "happy" not being available in versione = 1.17: $ cabal install ghc-mod Resolving dependencies... [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( /tmp/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0-1357/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0/Setup.hs, /tmp/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0-1357/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0/dist/setup/Main.o ) Linking /tmp/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0-1357/haskell-src-exts-1.14.0/dist/setup/setup ... Configuring haskell-src-exts-1.14.0... setup: The program happy version =1.17 is required but it could not be found. Failed to install haskell-src-exts-1.14.0 cabal: Error: some packages failed to install: ghc-mod-3.1.3 depends on haskell-src-exts-1.14.0 which failed to install. haskell-src-exts-1.14.0 failed during the configure step. The exception was: ExitFailure 1 hlint-1.8.53 depends on haskell-src-exts-1.14.0 which failed to install. However, it even is installed in v. 1.19, as you can see here: $ cabal install happy Resolving dependencies... [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( /tmp/happy-1.19.0-1124/happy-1.19.0/Setup.lhs, /tmp/happy-1.19.0-1124/happy-1.19.0/dist/setup/Main.o ) Linking /tmp/happy-1.19.0-1124/happy-1.19.0/dist/setup/setup ... Configuring happy-1.19.0... Building happy-1.19.0... Preprocessing executable 'happy' for happy-1.19.0... [ 1 of 18] Compiling NameSet ( src/NameSet.hs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/NameSet.o ) [ 2 of 18] Compiling Target ( src/Target.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Target.o ) [ 3 of 18] Compiling AbsSyn ( src/AbsSyn.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/AbsSyn.o ) [ 4 of 18] Compiling ParamRules ( src/ParamRules.hs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/ParamRules.o ) [ 5 of 18] Compiling GenUtils ( src/GenUtils.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/GenUtils.o ) [ 6 of 18] Compiling ParseMonad ( src/ParseMonad.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/ParseMonad.o ) [ 7 of 18] Compiling Lexer ( src/Lexer.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Lexer.o ) [ 8 of 18] Compiling Parser ( dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Parser.hs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Parser.o ) [ 9 of 18] Compiling AttrGrammar ( src/AttrGrammar.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/AttrGrammar.o ) [10 of 18] Compiling AttrGrammarParser ( dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/AttrGrammarParser.hs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/AttrGrammarParser.o ) [11 of 18] Compiling Grammar ( src/Grammar.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Grammar.o ) [12 of 18] Compiling First ( src/First.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/First.o ) [13 of 18] Compiling LALR ( src/LALR.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/LALR.o ) [14 of 18] Compiling Paths_happy ( dist/build/autogen/Paths_happy.hs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Paths_happy.o ) [15 of 18] Compiling ProduceCode ( src/ProduceCode.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/ProduceCode.o ) [16 of 18] Compiling ProduceGLRCode ( src/ProduceGLRCode.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/ProduceGLRCode.o ) [17 of 18] Compiling Info ( src/Info.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Info.o ) [18 of 18] Compiling Main ( src/Main.lhs, dist/build/happy/happy-tmp/Main.o ) Linking dist/build/happy/happy ... Installing executable(s) in /home/hope/.cabal/bin Installed happy-1.19.0 Any ideas? cabal-install version 1.16.0.2 using version 1.16.0 of the Cabal library

    Read the article

  • install qutecom cannot find msg722.so file, how to solve the problem?

    - by weixi
    I build the qutecom-3.0 on ubuntu 11.04, during install process, It shows: CMake Error at /home/student/qutecom-3.0/build/qutecom/src/presentation/qt/cmake_install.cmake:122 (FILE): file INSTALL cannot find "/home/student/qutecom-3.0/build/bin/plugins/mediastreamer2/msg722.so". Call Stack (most recent call first): /home/student/qutecom-3.0/build/qutecom/src/cmake_install.cmake:37 (INCLUDE) /home/student/qutecom-3.0/build/qutecom/cmake_install.cmake:38 (INCLUDE) cmake_install.cmake:49 (INCLUDE) make: *** [install] Error 1

    Read the article

  • When is the right time to join open source project for programmer?

    - by Mahesh
    Most of the newcomers in programming start with basic projects to start with programming. Most of the C++ progammers spend some time with puzzles and contests but this is not always helpful. Sometimes you've to spend some time on real projects. Starting your own open source project could be a problem in self-learning for newbie cause of lack of mentors and peers who can't look at your code and give suggestions. Open source projects can solve this problem, some projects could be best suited for new programmers. Besides everybody is newbie at some point. So i'll try and make this question a bit from beginners perspective. I tried few questions on stack overflow before asking this like How do i join & Bare minimum you need and how to get involved with open source and what level of programming etc. But this is not helping me when it comes to self-evaluating with skills. How to find that out ? How can i check what it takes to join open source project and am i really that comfortable with huge source code etc. My question is when to consider yourself comfortable joining open source programming ? I mean how will you test yourself that you're ready to take burden of big/small projects of open source ? how will you test yourself to see if you could work with version control/other programmers/tight schedule etc ?

    Read the article

  • Cross-compiling with OpenSSL for Windows

    - by singpolyma
    I'm trying to compile the oauth-utils http://mir.dnsalias.com/oss/oauth/start for Windows from Ubuntu. I have compiled it on Windows before (a few months back), but wanted to try cross-compiling. I got openssl build using mingw32 ok, and put libssl.a and libcrypto.a in the right place. The linker is now finding the libraries (yay!) but I get the following error: /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/libcrypto.a(rand_win.o):rand_win.c:(.text+0xaac): undefined reference to `_CreateDCA@16' /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/libcrypto.a(rand_win.o):rand_win.c:(.text+0xab9): undefined reference to `_CreateCompatibleDC@4' /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/libcrypto.a(rand_win.o):rand_win.c:(.text+0xacc): undefined reference to `_GetDeviceCaps@8' /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/libcrypto.a(rand_win.o):rand_win.c:(.text+0xadc): undefined reference to `_GetDeviceCaps@8' /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/libcrypto.a(rand_win.o):rand_win.c:(.text+0xaf4): undefined reference to `_CreateCompatibleBitmap@12' /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/libcrypto.a(rand_win.o):rand_win.c:(.text+0xb04): undefined reference to `_SelectObject@8' /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/libcrypto.a(rand_win.o):rand_win.c:(.text+0xb18): undefined reference to `_GetObjectA@12' /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/libcrypto.a(rand_win.o):rand_win.c:(.text+0xb81): undefined reference to `_BitBlt@36' /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/libcrypto.a(rand_win.o):rand_win.c:(.text+0xb8c): undefined reference to `_GetBitmapBits@12' /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/libcrypto.a(rand_win.o):rand_win.c:(.text+0xbe5): undefined reference to `_SelectObject@8' /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/libcrypto.a(rand_win.o):rand_win.c:(.text+0xbec): undefined reference to `_DeleteObject@4' /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/libcrypto.a(rand_win.o):rand_win.c:(.text+0xbf6): undefined reference to `_DeleteDC@4' /usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/lib/libcrypto.a(rand_win.o):rand_win.c:(.text+0xc00): undefined reference to `_DeleteDC@4' Any ideas what could be causing this? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • cross-compiling autoconf-based tools with mingw on Mac OS X

    - by paleozogt
    I'd like to cross-compile some open-source libraries (libiconv, gettext, glib2) for windows using mingw on Mac OS X. I've installed mingw on Mac with MacPorts. But now I'm not sure what to give to the configure script so that it will work. The cross-compilation tutorials I've seen all talk about makefiles, but no one mentions what to give autoconf-based projects. I'm configuring like this: ./configure --prefix=/opt/local/i386-mingw32 --host=i586-mingw32msvc but it doesn't seem to take. While the configure will pass, running "make" will give this error: i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1: no input files I thought the "--host" argument to configure was supposed to tell it to use the mingw compiler? I'm not sure what's going on here.

    Read the article

  • Small projects using the cathedral model: does open-source lower security?

    - by Anto
    We know of Linus' law: With enough eyeballs all bugs are shallow In general, people seem to say that open-source software is more secure because of that very thing, but... There are many small OSS projects with just 1 or 2 developers (the cathedral model, as described by ESR). For these projects, does releasing the source-code actually lower the security? For projects like the Linux kernel there are thousands of developers and security vulnerabilities are quite likely going to be found, but when just some few people look through the source code, while allowing crackers (black hat hackers) to see the source as well, is the security lowered instead of increased? I know that the security advantage closed-source software has over OSS is security through obscurity, which isn't good (at all), but it could help to some degree, at least by giving those few devs some more time (security through obscurity doesn't help with the if but with the when). EDIT: The question isn't whether OSS is more secure than non-OSS software but if the advantages for crackers are greater than the advantages for the developers who want to prevent security vulnerabilities from being exploited.

    Read the article

  • How can I patch a PPA and then upload the patched source to my PPA?

    - by user318938
    I'm trying to do something very simple but I'm having a lot of problems. I am trying to have a patched wine PPA. I want to download the wine1.7 ppa source from the ubuntu team ppa, apply 1 patch file, and upload the patched source to my PPA to be built. I'm getting the source with apt-get source wine1.7. That part is fine. I have tried using quilt, but that doesn't help. My PPA builds fine. The problem is, it never has my patch applied to the binaries. How can I patch a PPA and upload the patched source to my PPA to be built? Thanks

    Read the article

  • As a young student aspiring to have a career as a programmer, how should I feel about open source software?

    - by Matt
    Every once in a while on some technology websites a headline like this will pop up: http://www.osor.eu/news/nl-moving-to-open-source-would-save-government-one-to-four-billion My initial thought about government and organizations moving to open source software is that tons of programmers would lose their jobs and the industry would shrink. At the same time the proliferation and use of open source software seems to be greatly encouraged in many programming communities. Is my thinking that the full embrace of open source software everywhere will hurt the software industry a misconception? If it is not, then why do so many programmers love open source software?

    Read the article

  • How do I get the source code from a Google Code game project?

    - by BluFire
    I'm trying to get the Hedgewars source code. When I went to the downloads tab, it doesn't specify which is the actual game. I tried downloading it using the SVN Checkout on Tortoise, but it seems like it doesn't work on the browse section of Source. (Hgproject_filesAndroid_buildSDL-android-project) I then proceeded to the wiki but I got stuck at step two because I don't know anything about Mercurial. Some other things I don't know from the wiki is "FreePascal" "Android NDK" and "Tar" files. They are new to me so I am really confused. So my question is, how can I download the source code from Hedge Wars for Android without having to browse the source code inside the source tab?

    Read the article

  • What is the difference between industrial development and open source development?

    - by Ida
    Intuitively, I think open source development should be much more "casual" than industrial development process (like in Microsoft). Because for OSS development: Duty separation is not that strict than in big companies (maybe developers == testers in open source development?) People come in and out of the open source community, much more frequently than in big companies However, above are just my guesses. I really want to know more about the major difference between the open source and industrial development. Is their division of duty totally different (e.g., is there a leader/manager-like role in open source development?)? Maybe it is their communication style that differs a lot? Or their workflow? Please share your opinions. Thanks a lot!

    Read the article

  • Can I require a large donation ($499) in order for a company to receive an extended version of my open source project? [closed]

    - by Damian
    I want to make my project open source but some of its more advanced features are targeted to companies so I would like to require a donation before I send the source code to the donating company. It will be something like that: "If you want to use the extended features of XXXXXXX, please make a donation of $499 and you will receive the source code and the jar with the extended features. You will also receive personalized support by email." Is it legal and acceptable to do something like that? Can the companies donate an amount like that to an open source project? I mean, is it easy for them in terms of their accounting, tax, etc. to donate $499 dollars to an open source project. I know it is not a matter whether they will have money or not but more of a paying procedure matter.

    Read the article

  • What made you contribute to that open source project? [closed]

    - by Ermin
    I'm interested in real experience and personal answers not just those standard worn out "benefits of contributing to open source" that we all memorized by heart by now. I've met many people who contribute to open source project and almost never did this topic come up: why did they contribute to this open source project. So, if you've contributed to an open source project before in any way, can you please pause for a second and try to remember what really made you decide to contribute to that particular project. Was it a random decision, was it because you were bored, was it because the company you worked for was already using it and you contributed as part of your job, was it because the project was too big you wanted to get contracts, or the project was too small you wanted to build it, or because your prof or co-worker asked you to help with his open source project, or..... To substantiate your reasons, please mention the project name and rate your involvement (heavy, occasional, light, once).

    Read the article

  • Android: "Edit Source Lookup Path...".

    - by user307480
    I am developing on a Mac with Eclipse and have the skeleton for an app that implements the standard framework callbacks (onCreate, onDestroy, onPause, etc..). When I set breakpoints in the callbacks the debugger stops and displays a tab that says "ActivityThread.performLaunchActivity(ActivityThread $ActivityRecord,Intent)line:2477" and in the tab page body there is some red text that says "Source not found" and a button that says "Edit Source Lookup Path...". I have tried adding several paths via "Edit Source Lookup Path..." but can't see to find the one Eclipse is looking for. Can anyone point me in the right direction?

    Read the article

  • How should I contribute to an open source project?

    - by Rajan Walia
    I know basic C++ like about classes and other basic stuff what are the things which i need to know so that i can understand the source code of some advance open source projects and be able to make one too. Like if i read the code of vlc or some other projects I can't understand many things moreover i am just a beginner have not worked on even multi file programs so please suggest which are the books and what are the basic projects from where i can start.

    Read the article

  • Is there a preferred method of including the source code(s) of other software you've used in your ap

    - by Adam S
    I've used a few F/OSS libraries in my commercial application. As per their licenses, I am obligated to include their source codes along with my VS2008 application. This is my first time making a "real" commercial application, and I would appreciate some advice on how best to go about including their source codes. I don't want to package them as zip files alongside my installed. I still want my installer to be a single file.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >