Search Results

Search found 5349 results on 214 pages for 'override'.

Page 127/214 | < Previous Page | 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134  | Next Page >

  • Customizing Log4j to filter PatternLayout

    - by JavaScriptDude
    Greetings, I have just starting migrating to WLS 10.x and have noticed that the thread name [%t] for WL is quite verbose and more informative than I need for my deployment needs. Ultimately, I only care about the thread ID but WL gives me this:    [ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)' ~ Does anybody know if there is a way in log4j to write a custom filter that will allow me to override PatternLayout so I can parse the WLS Thread Name to just output the thread ID which in this case above is 0. I'd rather extend then customize as it makes upgrading libraries so much easier. Thanks :) - JsD

    Read the article

  • Why do I get CA1811 when I call a private method from a public method in C++/CLI?

    - by brickner
    I've recently upgraded my project from Visual Studio 2008 to Visual Studio 2010. By enabling Code Analysis and building on Release, I'm getting warning CA1811: Avoid uncalled private code. I've managed to reduce the code to this: .h file: public ref class Foo { public: virtual System::String^ ToString() override; private: static System::String^ Bar(); }; .cpp file: String^ Foo::ToString() { return Bar(); } String^ Foo::Bar() { return "abc"; } The warning I get: CA1811 : Microsoft.Performance : 'Foo::Bar(void)' appears to have no upstream public or protected callers. It doesn't matter if Bar() is static or not. I've tried to reproduce it in C# but I can't. I can only reproduce it in C++/CLI. Why do I get this warning? Is this a Visual Studio 2010 bug?

    Read the article

  • Silencing GCC warnings when using an "Uncopyable" class

    - by Kazade
    I have several classes that I don't want to be copyable, some of these classes have pointer data members. To make these classes uncopyable I privately inherit the following class template: template <class T> class Uncopyable { protected: Uncopyable() {} virtual ~Uncopyable() {} private: Uncopyable(const Uncopyable &); T & operator=(const T&); }; Which I used like so: class Entity : private Uncopyable<Entity> { } This works fine, however when I compile with -Weffc++ I still get the following warning: class Entity has pointer data members but does not override Entity(const Entity&) or operator=(const Entity&) Why is it still giving me this warning?

    Read the article

  • MVC 2 Beta DefaultControllerFactory with Areas

    - by stoto
    Why default factory WON'T return full name of the controllers (with namespaces)? I'm using Service Locator and autofac. using System.Web.Mvc; using Microsoft.Practices.ServiceLocation; namespace Application.Core.MVC { public override IController CreateController(System.Web.Routing.RequestContext requestContext, string **controllerName**) { return ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<IController>(controllerName); } } I had two home controllers (one under area Blog) http://localhost/Home http://localhost/Blog/Home controllerName return only "Home" without full qualified name for both in above code. This creates a problem when I try to regiser controllers' names for dependency injection. Here is how I register controllers right now according to this situation. Even this brings up the pages without exception. But When I access http://localhost/Home, both controllers invoked regardlessly. foreach (var tp in currentAssemblyControllersTypes) builder.Register(tp).FactoryScoped().Named(tp.Name.Replace("Controller", "")); Anyone can help?Thanks.

    Read the article

  • C# where keyword

    - by Carra
    Our Indian overseas developers have written the following piece of code (C# 2.0): public abstract class ObjectMapperBase<T> where T : new() { internal abstract bool UpdateObject(T plainObjectOrginal, T plainObjectNew, WebMethod fwm, IDbTransaction transaction); } Inheritor example: public abstract class OracleObjectMapperBase<T> : ObjectMapperBase<T> where T : new() { internal override bool UpdateObject(T plainObjectOrginal, T plainObjectNew, WebMethod fwm, IDbTransaction transaction) { //Fancy Reflection code } } I've never seen the where keyword before after the class name. What does this do?

    Read the article

  • Drupal limit number of menu items in primary links

    - by ninusik
    Is there a way to set a limit on how many menu items users can add to Primary Links menu? I'm working on a Drupal site and I have a horizontal primary links nav bar. There is only room for no more than 7-8 links in the nav bar. I don't want the future maintainer of the site to add more than 8 items to the menu. Is there a way I can set a limit on that? Some module or override function? Thanks,

    Read the article

  • How to access view items inside a ListView android?

    - by Yasir Khan
    I have ListView. i am successfully able to populate that ListView but what is want now is when user long press on ListItem it should make a button visible which i made invisible when i am populating ListView. here is snippet i have tried. mItemListView.setOnItemLongClickListener(new OnItemLongClickListener() { @Override public boolean onItemLongClick(AdapterView<?> adapterview, View arg1, int arg2, long arg3) { LinearLayout view=(LinearLayout) mItemListView.getChildAt(arg2); view.getChildAt(0).setVisibility(View.VISIBLE); return false; } }); My adapter is extending BaseAdapter

    Read the article

  • Iterator blocks and inheritance.

    - by Dave Van den Eynde
    Given a base class with the following interface: public class Base { public virtual IEnumerable<string> GetListOfStuff() { yield return "First"; yield return "Second"; yield return "Third"; } } I want to make a derived class that overrides the method, and adds its own stuff, like so: public class Derived : Base { public override IEnumerable<string> GetListOfStuff() { foreach (string s in base.GetListOfStuff()) { yield return s; } yield return "Fourth"; yield return "Fifth"; } } However, I'm greeted with a warning that "access to a member through a base keyword from an iterator cannot be verified". What's the accepted solution to this problem then?

    Read the article

  • Applying styles for custom TextArea in ActionScript 3

    - by Vijay Dev
    I have the following code to create and apply a few styles for a custom TextArea in ActionScript 3. public class MyCustomTextArea extends TextArea { override protected function createChildren():void { super.createChildren(); this.styleSheet.setStyle("sup", { display: "inline", fontFamily: "ArialSup", fontSize:"12"}); this.styleSheet.setStyle("sub", { display: "inline", fontFamily: "ArialSub", fontSize:"12"}); this.setStyle("fontFamily", "Arial"); } } I have two problems with this code. this.styleSheet is always null when I create an instance of the class. If this.styleSheet is initialized to new StyleSheet() to avoid this issue, then the TextArea instance does not seem to recognize any of the HTML tags that can be used with the htmlText property. Can anyone help in fixing these two issues? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Can Somebody Explain this java code

    - by dubbeat
    Hi, I'm just starting out on android and my java is verry rusty. I can't remember ever seeing a function nested in another function like this before. Could somebody explain to me exactly what final does and explain why you would nest a function in another like this? private final Handler handler = new Handler() { @Override public void handleMessage(final Message msg) { Log.v(Constants.LOGTAG, " " + ReviewList.CLASSTAG + " worker thread done, setup ReviewAdapter"); progressDialog.dismiss(); if ((reviews == null) || (reviews.size() == 0)) { empty.setText("No Data"); } else { reviewAdapter = new ReviewAdapter(ReviewList.this, reviews); setListAdapter(reviewAdapter); } } };

    Read the article

  • xVal ignoring fields that are hidden

    - by gmcalab
    I have a form where a user can toggle receiving funds either via check or via electronic transfer. When they choose either way in a list box, the respective part of the form hides. If they choose electronic transfer only bank info fields show, if they choose via check only address info shows and the bank fields are hidden. Well, since they choose one way or another I want to, not validate for something that is hidden. (Client Side) Is there a way to set xVal to only validate fields that are not visible? I tried to override validate with the following but no dice... $('#EditPayment').validate({ elementwhichishidden: { required: function(element) { return ($(element).parent().parent().css('display') != 'none'); } } });

    Read the article

  • Flagging complex properties as Browsable in the compact framework

    - by Rowland Shaw
    I'm working on a compact framework project and whilst most of the properties are fairly straight forward (I.e. mark them as browsable in the xmta file), I'm struggling to get this to work for more complex types - on the full framework, I'd just implement a custom TypeConverter and go from there, but it seems the CF TypeConverter doesn't have any of the type converting methods to override, which has left me a little stuck? It probably should be blindingly obvious but how would I go about supporting design time property support for more complex types (for the sake of argument, assume I can already convert to and from a string, but I'd prefer to keep this strongly typed, rather than just pretend it was a string and parse it both ways. Where should I be looking to achieve this?

    Read the article

  • From my code, I can't trace the out of bounds exception.

    - by Matt
    public override Models.CalculationNode Parse(string expression) { var calNode = new Models.CalculationNode(); int i = expression.Length; char[] x = expression.ToCharArray(); string temp = ""; //Backwards assembly of the tree //Right Node while (!IsOperator(x[i]) && i > 0) { if (!x[i].Equals(' ')) temp = x[i] + temp; i--; } } It has been a while since I've used trees and I'm getting an out of bounds exception in the while loop.

    Read the article

  • HTML 5 drag-drop into wysiwyg editor in Firefox

    - by einarq
    I have a wysiwyg editor using the HTML 5 drag-drop api to allow the user to place widgets within the page they are editing. When the OnDrop event fires, I prevent the default event, and insert some html within the editor that represents the widget they inserted. I use execCommand("inserthtml", false, html) for this in Firefox. This works fine in IE, but in Firefox the html is not placed in the location where it was dropped. It always gets placed in the location where the previous selection was, which leads me to believe that cancelling the OnDrop event to override the default drop also cancels the selection change. Any ideas on how to solve this? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Why is always MasterName blank in OnActionExecuted?

    - by devzero
    I'm trying to get the master page changed for all my aspx pages. For some reason I'm unable to detect when this function is called for a ascx page instead. Any help in correting this would be appreciated. protected override void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext filterContext) { var action = filterContext.Result as ViewResult; if (action != null && action.MasterName != "" && Request.IsAjaxRequest()) { action.MasterName = "Ajax"; } base.OnActionExecuted(filterContext); }

    Read the article

  • Set height of Flex Accordion to height of tallest child

    - by Mike Deck
    By default the height of an Flex Accordion container is the height of the initially selected child. I'd like to be able to set the height to the tallest child so that no resizing or scrolling is necessary when other children are selected. I do not want to use the resizeToContent property. I want the size of the container to stay constant no matter what child is selected. My current thought is to extend the accordion class setting the creation policy to "all" and then override the measure function to loop through all the children and find the tallest one and use that for the height. This seems a little kludgy though, so I'd like to know if there is a better approach. Ultimately my question is: is there a way to set the size of an accordion container such that the container never resizes and scoll bars are never necessary to display any of the children?

    Read the article

  • How to rotate a drawable with anti-aliasing enabled

    - by Mike
    I need to rotate an ImageView by a few degrees. I'm doing this by subclassing ImageView and overloading onDraw() @Override protected void onDraw(Canvas canvas) { canvas.save(); canvas.scale(0.92f,0.92f); canvas.translate(14, 0); canvas.rotate(1,0,0); super.onDraw(canvas); canvas.restore(); } The problem is that the image that results shows a bunch of jaggies. How can I antialias an ImageView that I need to rotate in order to eliminate jaggies? Is there a better way to do this?

    Read the article

  • Final enum in Thread's run() method

    - by portoalet
    Hi, Why is the Elvis elvis definition has to be final to be used inside the Thread run() method? Elvis elvis = Elvis.INSTANCE; // ----> should be final Elvis elvis = Elvis.INSTANCE elvis.sing(4); Thread t1 = new Thread( new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { elvis.sing(6); // --------> elvis has to be final to compile } } ); public enum Elvis { INSTANCE(2); Elvis() { this.x = new AtomicInteger(0); } Elvis(int x){ this.x = new AtomicInteger(x); } private AtomicInteger x = new AtomicInteger(0); public int getX() { return x.get(); } public void setX(int x) {this.x = new AtomicInteger(x);} public void sing(int x) { this.x = new AtomicInteger(x); System.out.println("Elvis singing.." + x); } }

    Read the article

  • FindBugs and CheckForNull on classes vs. interfaces

    - by ndn
    Is there any way to let FindBugs check and warn me if a CheckForNull annotation is present on the implementation of a method in a class, but not on the declaration of the method in the interface? import javax.annotation.CheckForNull; interface Foo { public String getBar(); } class FooImpl implements Foo { @CheckForNull @Override public String getBar() { return null; } } public class FindBugsDemo { public static void main(String[] args) { Foo foo = new FooImpl(); System.out.println(foo.getBar().length()); } } I just discovered a bug in my application due to a missing null check that was not spotted by FindBugs because CheckForNull was only present on FooImpl, but not on Foo, and I don't want to spot all other locations of this problem manually.

    Read the article

  • GetHashCode Method reliability in Silverlight/WP7.1

    - by abhinav
    I am attempting to hash and keep(the hash) an object of type IEnumerable<anotherobject> which has about a 1000 entries. I'll be generating another such object, but this time I'd like to check for any changes in the values of the entries using the hash codes of the two objects. Basically, I was wondering if GetHashCode() is apt for this, both from a performance perspective and reliability perspective (getting different values for different object values and same values for same object values, always). If I have to override it, what would be a good way to do so, does it always depend on the type of anotherobject and what Equals means when comparing two anotherobjects? Is there a generic way to do it? This concern is because my object can be quite big.

    Read the article

  • Detect if Java Swing component has been hidden

    - by kayahr
    Assume we have the following Swing application: final JFrame frame = new JFrame(); final JPanel outer = new JPanel(); frame.add(outer); JComponent inner = new SomeSpecialComponent(); outer.add(inner); So in this example we simply have an outer panel in the frame and a special component in the panel. This special component must do something when it is hidden and shown. But the problem is that setVisible() is called on the outer panel and not on the special component. So I can't override the setVisible method in the special component and I also can't use a component listener on it. I could register the listener on the parent component but what if the outer panel is also in another panel and this outer outer panel is hidden? Is there an easier solution than recursively adding componentlisteners to all parent components to detect a visibility change in SomeSpecialComponent?

    Read the article

  • redirect inputStream to JTextField

    - by gt_ebuddy
    I want to redirect the Standard System input to JTextField, So that a user must type his/her input in JTextField (instead of console.) I found System.setIn(InputStream istream) for redirecting System.in. Here is my scratch code where i confused on reading from JTextField - inputJTextField. System.setIn(new InputStream() { @Override public int read() throws IOException { //how to read content? return Integer.parseInt(inputJTextField.getText()); } }); My Question is how to read content from GUI Component ( like JTextField and Cast it to String and other types after redirecting the input stream?

    Read the article

  • Why is the Twitter Bootstrap "fixed" layout NOT fixed?

    - by leonel
    The Twitter Bootstrap site reads as follows: The default and simple 940px-wide, centered layout for just about any website or page provided by a single <div class="container">. Quote from http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/scaffolding.html#layouts That's exactly what I have in my HTML but when I inspect the element, I see this CSS apply to it: .container, .navbar-fixed-top .container, .navbar-fixed-bottom .container { width: 1170px; } By the way, if I override that CSS rule by adding... div.container{ width:940px; } Then the elements inside the div.container are wider than the div.container itself and look out of place. So, why is the Twitter Bootstrap "fixed" layout NOT fixed? and how can I make it fixed?

    Read the article

  • Android 1.6: onActivityResult is not called

    - by Seb
    Hi, I have a problem with the method "onActivityResult". I create a new Activity from my main activity: Intent intent = new Intent(this, NewActivity.class); startActivityForResult(intent, 0); The new Activity is ended like this: Intent resultIntent = new Intent(); resultIntent.putExtra("vid", hmvenues.get(venues[currentPosition])); resultIntent.putExtra("name", venues[currentPosition]); setResult(RESULT_OK, resultIntent); finish(); But the Method onActivityResult seem to be not called @Override public void onActivityResult(int requestCode, int resultCode, Intent data) { Log.d(this.getClass().getName(),"onActivityResult"); ... } Does anyone have an idea, what I did wrong? Thanks!! Seb

    Read the article

  • Can I change class types in a setter with an object-oriented language?

    - by user214626
    Hello, Here is the problem statement : Calling a setter on the object should result in the object to change to an object of a different class, which language can support this ? Ex. I have a class called "Man" (Parent Class), and two children namely "Toddler" and "Old Man", they are its children because they override a behaviour in Man called as walk.( i.e Toddler sometimes walks using both his hands and legs kneeled down and the Old man uses a stick to support himself). The Man class has a attribute called age, I have a setter on Man,say it is called setAge(int ageValue). I have 3 objects, 2 toddlers, 1 old-Man. (The system is up and running,i guess when we say objects it is obvious) .I will make this call, toddler.setAge(80), I expect the toddler to change to an object of type Old Man. Is this possible.Please suggest. Thanks,

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134  | Next Page >