Search Results

Search found 19055 results on 763 pages for 'high performance'.

Page 139/763 | < Previous Page | 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146  | Next Page >

  • SPARC T4-4 Beats 8-CPU IBM POWER7 on TPC-H @3000GB Benchmark

    - by Brian
    Oracle's SPARC T4-4 server delivered a world record TPC-H @3000GB benchmark result for systems with four processors. This result beats eight processor results from IBM (POWER7) and HP (x86). The SPARC T4-4 server also delivered better performance per core than these eight processor systems from IBM and HP. Comparisons below are based upon system to system comparisons, highlighting Oracle's complete software and hardware solution. This database world record result used Oracle's Sun Storage 2540-M2 arrays (rotating disk) connected to a SPARC T4-4 server running Oracle Solaris 11 and Oracle Database 11g Release 2 demonstrating the power of Oracle's integrated hardware and software solution. The SPARC T4-4 server based configuration achieved a TPC-H scale factor 3000 world record for four processor systems of 205,792 QphH@3000GB with price/performance of $4.10/QphH@3000GB. The SPARC T4-4 server with four SPARC T4 processors (total of 32 cores) is 7% faster than the IBM Power 780 server with eight POWER7 processors (total of 32 cores) on the TPC-H @3000GB benchmark. The SPARC T4-4 server is 36% better in price performance compared to the IBM Power 780 server on the TPC-H @3000GB Benchmark. The SPARC T4-4 server is 29% faster than the IBM Power 780 for data loading. The SPARC T4-4 server is up to 3.4 times faster than the IBM Power 780 server for the Refresh Function. The SPARC T4-4 server with four SPARC T4 processors is 27% faster than the HP ProLiant DL980 G7 server with eight x86 processors on the TPC-H @3000GB benchmark. The SPARC T4-4 server is 52% faster than the HP ProLiant DL980 G7 server for data loading. The SPARC T4-4 server is up to 3.2 times faster than the HP ProLiant DL980 G7 for the Refresh Function. The SPARC T4-4 server achieved a peak IO rate from the Oracle database of 17 GB/sec. This rate was independent of the storage used, as demonstrated by the TPC-H @3000TB benchmark which used twelve Sun Storage 2540-M2 arrays (rotating disk) and the TPC-H @1000TB benchmark which used four Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array devices (flash storage). [*] The SPARC T4-4 server showed linear scaling from TPC-H @1000GB to TPC-H @3000GB. This demonstrates that the SPARC T4-4 server can handle the increasingly larger databases required of DSS systems. [*] The SPARC T4-4 server benchmark results demonstrate a complete solution of building Decision Support Systems including data loading, business questions and refreshing data. Each phase usually has a time constraint and the SPARC T4-4 server shows superior performance during each phase. [*] The TPC believes that comparisons of results published with different scale factors are misleading and discourages such comparisons. Performance Landscape The table lists the leading TPC-H @3000GB results for non-clustered systems. TPC-H @3000GB, Non-Clustered Systems System Processor P/C/T – Memory Composite(QphH) $/perf($/QphH) Power(QppH) Throughput(QthH) Database Available SPARC Enterprise M9000 3.0 GHz SPARC64 VII+ 64/256/256 – 1024 GB 386,478.3 $18.19 316,835.8 471,428.6 Oracle 11g R2 09/22/11 SPARC T4-4 3.0 GHz SPARC T4 4/32/256 – 1024 GB 205,792.0 $4.10 190,325.1 222,515.9 Oracle 11g R2 05/31/12 SPARC Enterprise M9000 2.88 GHz SPARC64 VII 32/128/256 – 512 GB 198,907.5 $15.27 182,350.7 216,967.7 Oracle 11g R2 12/09/10 IBM Power 780 4.1 GHz POWER7 8/32/128 – 1024 GB 192,001.1 $6.37 210,368.4 175,237.4 Sybase 15.4 11/30/11 HP ProLiant DL980 G7 2.27 GHz Intel Xeon X7560 8/64/128 – 512 GB 162,601.7 $2.68 185,297.7 142,685.6 SQL Server 2008 10/13/10 P/C/T = Processors, Cores, Threads QphH = the Composite Metric (bigger is better) $/QphH = the Price/Performance metric in USD (smaller is better) QppH = the Power Numerical Quantity QthH = the Throughput Numerical Quantity The following table lists data load times and refresh function times during the power run. TPC-H @3000GB, Non-Clustered Systems Database Load & Database Refresh System Processor Data Loading(h:m:s) T4Advan RF1(sec) T4Advan RF2(sec) T4Advan SPARC T4-4 3.0 GHz SPARC T4 04:08:29 1.0x 67.1 1.0x 39.5 1.0x IBM Power 780 4.1 GHz POWER7 05:51:50 1.5x 147.3 2.2x 133.2 3.4x HP ProLiant DL980 G7 2.27 GHz Intel Xeon X7560 08:35:17 2.1x 173.0 2.6x 126.3 3.2x Data Loading = database load time RF1 = power test first refresh transaction RF2 = power test second refresh transaction T4 Advan = the ratio of time to T4 time Complete benchmark results found at the TPC benchmark website http://www.tpc.org. Configuration Summary and Results Hardware Configuration: SPARC T4-4 server 4 x SPARC T4 3.0 GHz processors (total of 32 cores, 128 threads) 1024 GB memory 8 x internal SAS (8 x 300 GB) disk drives External Storage: 12 x Sun Storage 2540-M2 array storage, each with 12 x 15K RPM 300 GB drives, 2 controllers, 2 GB cache Software Configuration: Oracle Solaris 11 11/11 Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition Audited Results: Database Size: 3000 GB (Scale Factor 3000) TPC-H Composite: 205,792.0 QphH@3000GB Price/performance: $4.10/QphH@3000GB Available: 05/31/2012 Total 3 year Cost: $843,656 TPC-H Power: 190,325.1 TPC-H Throughput: 222,515.9 Database Load Time: 4:08:29 Benchmark Description The TPC-H benchmark is a performance benchmark established by the Transaction Processing Council (TPC) to demonstrate Data Warehousing/Decision Support Systems (DSS). TPC-H measurements are produced for customers to evaluate the performance of various DSS systems. These queries and updates are executed against a standard database under controlled conditions. Performance projections and comparisons between different TPC-H Database sizes (100GB, 300GB, 1000GB, 3000GB, 10000GB, 30000GB and 100000GB) are not allowed by the TPC. TPC-H is a data warehousing-oriented, non-industry-specific benchmark that consists of a large number of complex queries typical of decision support applications. It also includes some insert and delete activity that is intended to simulate loading and purging data from a warehouse. TPC-H measures the combined performance of a particular database manager on a specific computer system. The main performance metric reported by TPC-H is called the TPC-H Composite Query-per-Hour Performance Metric (QphH@SF, where SF is the number of GB of raw data, referred to as the scale factor). QphH@SF is intended to summarize the ability of the system to process queries in both single and multiple user modes. The benchmark requires reporting of price/performance, which is the ratio of the total HW/SW cost plus 3 years maintenance to the QphH. A secondary metric is the storage efficiency, which is the ratio of total configured disk space in GB to the scale factor. Key Points and Best Practices Twelve Sun Storage 2540-M2 arrays were used for the benchmark. Each Sun Storage 2540-M2 array contains 12 15K RPM drives and is connected to a single dual port 8Gb FC HBA using 2 ports. Each Sun Storage 2540-M2 array showed 1.5 GB/sec for sequential read operations and showed linear scaling, achieving 18 GB/sec with twelve Sun Storage 2540-M2 arrays. These were stand alone IO tests. The peak IO rate measured from the Oracle database was 17 GB/sec. Oracle Solaris 11 11/11 required very little system tuning. Some vendors try to make the point that storage ratios are of customer concern. However, storage ratio size has more to do with disk layout and the increasing capacities of disks – so this is not an important metric in which to compare systems. The SPARC T4-4 server and Oracle Solaris efficiently managed the system load of over one thousand Oracle Database parallel processes. Six Sun Storage 2540-M2 arrays were mirrored to another six Sun Storage 2540-M2 arrays on which all of the Oracle database files were placed. IO performance was high and balanced across all the arrays. The TPC-H Refresh Function (RF) simulates periodical refresh portion of Data Warehouse by adding new sales and deleting old sales data. Parallel DML (parallel insert and delete in this case) and database log performance are a key for this function and the SPARC T4-4 server outperformed both the IBM POWER7 server and HP ProLiant DL980 G7 server. (See the RF columns above.) See Also Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC) Home Page Ideas International Benchmark Page SPARC T4-4 Server oracle.com OTN Oracle Solaris oracle.com OTN Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition oracle.com OTN Sun Storage 2540-M2 Array oracle.com OTN Disclosure Statement TPC-H, QphH, $/QphH are trademarks of Transaction Processing Performance Council (TPC). For more information, see www.tpc.org. SPARC T4-4 205,792.0 QphH@3000GB, $4.10/QphH@3000GB, available 5/31/12, 4 processors, 32 cores, 256 threads; IBM Power 780 QphH@3000GB, 192,001.1 QphH@3000GB, $6.37/QphH@3000GB, available 11/30/11, 8 processors, 32 cores, 128 threads; HP ProLiant DL980 G7 162,601.7 QphH@3000GB, $2.68/QphH@3000GB available 10/13/10, 8 processors, 64 cores, 128 threads.

    Read the article

  • Cleaning up temp files in Mac OS X

    - by deddebme
    I was a Windows person for more than 10 years. Around 4 months ago, I switched to Mac, and I have never looked back. But there is one thing that bothers me, which is my Mac partition volume is losing space slowly and gradually. I am pretty sure there are a lot of orphaned temporary files laying around in the volume. I know where to find the obsoleted temp files in my Windows partition, how about in Mac OSX?

    Read the article

  • Computer specs for a large database

    - by SpeksETC
    What sort of computer specs (CPU, RAM, disk speed) should I use for running queries on a database of 200+ million records? The queries are for a research project, so there is only one "user" and only one query will be running at a time. I tried it on my own laptop with SQL Server with an i3 processor, 2GB RAM, 5400 RPM disk and a simple query didn't finish even after 8+ hours. I have an option to connect a SSD via eSata and upgrade to 4GB RAM, but not sure if this will be enough... Thanks! Edit: The database is about 25 GB and the indexes are not setup properly. When I tried to add an index, I let it run for about 8 hours and it still hadn't finished so I gave up. Should I have more patience :)? In general, the queries will run once in a while and its ok even if it takes a couple hours to complete.... Also, the queries will produce probably about 10 million records which I need to process using Stata/Matlab and I'm concerned that my current laptop is not strong enough, but unsure of the bottleneck....

    Read the article

  • How to use most of memory available on MySQL

    - by Zilvinas
    I've got a MySQL server which has both InnoDB and MyISAM tables. InnoDB tablespace is quite small under 4 GB. MyISAM is big ~250 GB in total of which 50 GB is for indexes. Our server has 32 GB of RAM but it usually uses only ~8GB. Our key_buffer_size is only 2GB. But our key cache hit ratio is ~95%. I find it hard to believe.. Here's our key statistics: | Key_blocks_not_flushed | 1868 | | Key_blocks_unused | 109806 | | Key_blocks_used | 1714736 | | Key_read_requests | 19224818713 | | Key_reads | 60742294 | | Key_write_requests | 1607946768 | | Key_writes | 64788819 | key_cache_block_size is default at 1024. We have 52 GB's of index data and 2GB key cache is enough to get a 95% hit ratio. Is that possible? On the other side data set is 200GB and since MyISAM uses OS (Centos) caching I would expect it to use a lot more memory to cache accessed myisam data. But at this stage I see that key_buffer is completely used, our buffer pool size for innodb is 4gb and is also completely used that adds up to 6GB. Which means data is cached using just 1 GB? My question is how could I check where all the free memory could be used? How could I check if MyISAM hits OS cache for data reads instead of disk?

    Read the article

  • Is Splitting IDE hdds between Primary and Secondary faster?

    - by earlz
    Hello, I'm doing RAID 0 on two IDE harddrives (yes, this is old hardware). Will the harddrives be faster if I attach them separately so that one is on the Primary IDE controller and the other is on the Secondary IDE controller? Or would it just be as good as having them both on the Primary IDE as master and slave?

    Read the article

  • Just to not to be ignorant.

    - by atch
    Could anyone explain to me why is it that producers of processors claim that their processor can perform so many thousands (or millions) operations per second and yet typical program (Word, VS etc.) on my machine with 4GB, 3500hz starts with no less than 10 sec. Have to mention that I've just formatted disk and tick any necessary boxes to optimize my machine. So if for example outlook starts in 10 sec I wonder how many millions of operations have to be performed to run such program? Thanks

    Read the article

  • TIME_WAIT connections not being cleaned up after timeout period expires

    - by Mark Dawson
    I am stress testing one of my servers by hitting it with a constant stream of new network connections, the tcp_fin_timeout is set to 60, so if I send a constant stream of something like 100 requests per second, I would expect to see a rolling average of 6000 (60 * 100) connections in a TIME_WAIT state, this is happening, but looking in netstat (using -o) to see the timers, I see connections like: TIME_WAIT timewait (0.00/0/0) where their timeout has expired but the connection is still hanging around, I then eventually run out of connections. Anyone know why these connections don't get cleaned up? If I stop creating new connections they do eventually disappear but while I am constantly creating new connections they don't, seems like the kernel isn't getting chance to clean them up? Is there some other config options I need to set to remove the connections as soon as they have expired? The server is running Ubuntu and my web server is nginx. Also it has iptables with connection tracking, not sure if that would cause these TIME_WAIT connections to live on. Thanks Mark.

    Read the article

  • How to speed up a HP M9517C

    - by Jen
    I bought a system with 8GB RAM, 1TB HD, Quad-Core AMD Phenom 9550, Nvidia Geforce 9300GE, 64-bit Windows Vista Machine. Bought it primarily because it was cheap and came with 25.5 inch screen. Problem: It's slow - if you can believe it. My Dell laptop 1525 is faster and more stable! I tried installing and dual-booting Linux Mint and ran into video and audio troubles. I need fast and stable and I'm going for awesome. Anyone have some suggestions on making this thing smoking hot? Vista is fine, but slows over time - suspect virus/spyware/etc.. But I need to use Photoshop, Fireworks, Dreamweaver, Illustrator. I've tried the alternatives and I just don't like them. When you've got deadlines looming you want to work with what you know. Also use Skype (and I had audio problems with it in Linux), gotomeeting, gotowebinar. Don't need MS Office. Tried VMWare, Virtualbox and again - I keep getting audio/video problems. I'd love someone's input on THEIR setup and how they got there. I'm sure I need to upgrade my video card, but what should I go to?

    Read the article

  • windows is unresponsive but works well in safe mode

    - by kacalapy
    I was installing a few utility apps and things when my laptop running windows 7 stopped responding. I tried to reboot and still very unresponsive... the mouse moves but i am unable to click on icons or open the start menu. eventually things catch up after over a minute. when i start in safe mode with networking support i am able to operate the laptop at lightening speed and web browsing is a dream. I ran msconfig and shut off all non windows services and still get the same thing. after no results i then got and ran spybot, malwarebytes, and other such tools but got no results. they all show nothing wrong. now what?

    Read the article

  • Max. Bandwidth Cannot be Reached

    - by Poyraz Sagtekin
    I have a question regarding the bandwidth usage. I don't think it's a very technical question but I really want to know the reason behind the problem. I'm having my education in one of my university's campuses. There is a 200mbps bandwidth availability for approx. 2100 students. Our main campus has 25,000 students and 2gbps bandwidth and there is no problem with the internet connection speed in main campus. However, in my campus, we are having difficulties with the internet connection speed. I went to IT department of my university and they've showed me some graphics about the bandwidth usage. The usage of the bandwidth has never reached 200mbps and it generally is around 130-140mbps. According to this information, maximum bandwidth is never made by the users but the browsing speed is not very convincing. What can be the problem? Maybe this is a silly question but I really want to know the reason. They told me that they've reached 180mbps before.

    Read the article

  • What's the fastest filesystem for developer builds?

    - by Dan Fabulich
    I'm putting together a Linux box that will act as a continuous integration build server; we'll mostly build Java stuff, but I think this question applies to any compiled language. What filesystem and configuration settings should I use? (For example, I know I won't need atime for this!) The build server will spend a lot of time reading and writing small files, and scanning directories to see which files have been modified.

    Read the article

  • Looking for the best ec2 setup for 3 sites totaling in 1.5 mil in traffic monthly

    - by john h.
    I am looking to consolidate our current aws setup of 2 Large ubuntu ec2 servers and 2 large RDS server for our 3 websites that have a total of about 1.5 million hits a month and increasing every month with the majority of traffic (1 mil) to one forum site in the group and the rest of traffic to an ecommerce site and a small wordpress site. So here is my question/thought? Would it be better for us to combine the two ec2 large servers to just one and same with the 2 RDS servers so we run all three sites off one large ec2 and one RDS. -or- Should we setup maybe 2-3 smaller ec2 servers load balenced and a single RDS. -or- Something completely different setup? One concern is that if one site crashes it takes with it the others. It happened in the past but I am pretty sure its because of the forum software and not the server setup. -john

    Read the article

  • Zabbix - Some of the monitored items don't refreh

    - by Niro
    I'm experiencing a strange issue with Zabbix monitoring a MySQL server. Most of the data from the server such as MySQL queries per second and MySQL uptime , Buffers memory etc. update nicely while some data like CPU iowait time (avg1) , Host local time ,MySQL number of threads and other items which were monitored in the past has last check time of about a week ago. I can't find any logic in this, for example Mysql number of threads and Mysql queries per second are obtained in a similar way so it does not make sense one of them is monitored and one is not. Please help- how can I fix this? Update - I used zabbix_get from the zabbix server to check one of the items on the zabbix client and it works so the problem must be on the zabbix server side

    Read the article

  • My dedicated server keeps getting very slow that it fails to load the application

    - by server
    I have an application running on Windows Server 2008, running IIS 7.5, SQL Server 2008, 4GB RAM from brinkster. The problem is, every couple of days I get the same 10,000 calls that the system is very slow, and its not operating properly, then after 30 minutes of that it just fails to load. I try to access the server from the remote desktop connection but I can't access it. The only way it I can get it working again is to call the support at brinkster and have them do a manual reboot of the server. After that it works well for some time, and the it re-crashes after some time. Support over there, are not helping a lot.

    Read the article

  • PHP + MYSQL site perfomance

    - by Diego
    I have to manage a site which wasn't developed by me. It is in PHP using a mysql database, which is located in the web server. The site, sometimes (when the visitors increase too much) stops responding, or respond too slow. I have developed some sites in PHP but never took care of the management so really don't know where to start. The server (the hard) seems to be fine, when the web stops responding the cpu is being used at about 55% and has a lot of memory. I'm not asking someone to solve this issue. I only would really like if someone could give me a few tips about where can I find logs and how should I read and interpret them. So, that way I would be able to know if its the net traffic, the database (which queries), or what. Thanks! Update: Forgot to say: it is a Windows Server 2003. Note: I've recorded about a day with Jet Profiler. I don't really understand all the information it provides but there is one query which it marks as really slow. It makes sense because it is a select with a where clause which has three like condition. Initially I didn't include this in my question because when I run the query from MySQL Query Browser it doesn't take any long. It is under 0.01 seconds.

    Read the article

  • Is 30 calls / second a lot for one IIS server?

    - by Lieven Cardoen
    We have a RIA application that 300 clients concurrently use in an intranet environment. Together they make 30 calls / second to IIS (asp.net) (actually it's 60 but calls are loadbalanced over two IIS servers). Half of the calls is getting an asset (Caching Profile is used so most of the time cache is hit), the other half is saving data to a sql server. Retrieving an asset is done with a aspx page. Saving the data happens via WebORB, asp.net and Sql Server. So some processing is needed by WebORB (amf decoding, GZIP, ...). We also use Spring.NET, and some of the container objects have a request scope (not a lot). IIS servers -- Virtual machines, 4 CPU, 2 gb RAM. They are based on Windows 2008 x64 SP2 Enterprise Edition. Sql Server 2008 is used. Apparently CPU of both IIS serers is constantly around 60-70%. Now, my question, is the load of 60-70% acceptable and how could we possible bring that down to less % (maybe using only one IIS server)? + Is 2 gb RAM enough? Assets can be up to 20mb, but on average, they are about 30kb. (the load of 60-70% is achieved with assets around 30kb). The data that gets saved with weborb is very small (2kb) and is just one object.

    Read the article

  • RDMA architecture - do you need adapters on both ends?

    - by Bobb
    I know Linux can use RDMA NICs like Solarflare... I just found Intel has something like that NetEffect cards. But Intel is talking all about clusters.. Can someone please explain. If I want low-latency networking and install RDMA NIC on my server. Is there limitation on where the cable can go? Is there a specific device expected on the other end? Is it special RDMA switch or RDMA adapter before switch or what? Why is this cluster talk? What if I want a single server with Windows (I can install HPC Windows or Windows 2008 R2)?

    Read the article

  • AMD 24 core server memory bandwidth

    - by ntherning
    I need some help to determine whether the memory bandwidth I'm seeing under Linux on my server is normal or not. Here's the server spec: HP ProLiant DL165 G7 2x AMD Opteron 6164 HE 12-Core 40 GB RAM (10 x 4GB DDR1333) Debian 6.0 Using mbw on this server I get the following numbers: foo1:~# mbw -n 3 1024 Long uses 8 bytes. Allocating 2*134217728 elements = 2147483648 bytes of memory. Using 262144 bytes as blocks for memcpy block copy test. Getting down to business... Doing 3 runs per test. 0 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.58047 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 1764.082 MiB/s 1 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.58012 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 1765.152 MiB/s 2 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.58010 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 1765.201 MiB/s AVG Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.58023 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 1764.811 MiB/s 0 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.36174 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2830.778 MiB/s 1 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.35869 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2854.817 MiB/s 2 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.35848 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2856.481 MiB/s AVG Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.35964 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2847.310 MiB/s 0 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.23546 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 4348.860 MiB/s 1 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.23544 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 4349.230 MiB/s 2 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.23544 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 4349.359 MiB/s AVG Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.23545 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 4349.149 MiB/s On one of my other servers (based on Intel Xeon E3-1270): foo2:~# mbw -n 3 1024 Long uses 8 bytes. Allocating 2*134217728 elements = 2147483648 bytes of memory. Using 262144 bytes as blocks for memcpy block copy test. Getting down to business... Doing 3 runs per test. 0 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.18960 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 5400.901 MiB/s 1 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.18922 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 5411.690 MiB/s 2 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.18944 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 5405.491 MiB/s AVG Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.18942 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 5406.024 MiB/s 0 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.14838 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 6901.200 MiB/s 1 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.14818 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 6910.561 MiB/s 2 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.14820 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 6909.628 MiB/s AVG Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.14825 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 6907.127 MiB/s 0 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.04362 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 23477.623 MiB/s 1 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.04262 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 24025.151 MiB/s 2 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.04258 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 24048.849 MiB/s AVG Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.04294 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 23847.599 MiB/s For reference here's what I get on my Intel based laptop: laptop:~$ mbw -n 3 1024 Long uses 8 bytes. Allocating 2*134217728 elements = 2147483648 bytes of memory. Using 262144 bytes as blocks for memcpy block copy test. Getting down to business... Doing 3 runs per test. 0 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.40566 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2524.269 MiB/s 1 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.38458 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2662.638 MiB/s 2 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.38876 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2634.043 MiB/s AVG Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.39300 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2605.600 MiB/s 0 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.30707 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 3334.745 MiB/s 1 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.30425 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 3365.653 MiB/s 2 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.30342 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 3374.849 MiB/s AVG Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.30491 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 3358.328 MiB/s 0 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.07875 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 13003.670 MiB/s 1 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.08374 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 12228.034 MiB/s 2 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.07635 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 13411.216 MiB/s AVG Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.07961 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 12862.006 MiB/s So according to mbw my laptop is 3 times faster than the server!!! Please help me explain this. I've also tried to mount a ram disk and use dd to benchmark it and I get similar differences so I don't think mbw is to blame. I've checked the BIOS settings and the memory seem to be running at full speed. According to the hosting company the modules are all OK. Could this have something to do with NUMA? It seems like Node Interleaving is disabled on this server. Will enabling it (thus turning off NUMA) make a difference? foo1:~# numactl --hardware available: 4 nodes (0-3) node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 node 0 size: 8190 MB node 0 free: 7898 MB node 1 cpus: 6 7 8 9 10 11 node 1 size: 12288 MB node 1 free: 12073 MB node 2 cpus: 18 19 20 21 22 23 node 2 size: 12288 MB node 2 free: 12034 MB node 3 cpus: 12 13 14 15 16 17 node 3 size: 8192 MB node 3 free: 8032 MB node distances: node 0 1 2 3 0: 10 20 20 20 1: 20 10 20 20 2: 20 20 10 20 3: 20 20 20 10

    Read the article

  • Slow Windows Explorer on Windows 7

    - by MadBoy
    I have Laptop with i7 (4 cores), 8GB ram and SSD OCZ Vertex 3 MaxIOPS which in testing that I did just now does 400mb/s+ read/write. However the responsiveness of Windows Explorer is far from being perfect. Opening up Computer, Documents, going into folders is very slow (1-5seconds). I don't have any viruses or spyware and I have tried changing properties to optimize view for General Items. I tried disabling Search Indexer but it made search in Outlook 2010 crawl and didn't bring any other effect. Even double clicking on file takes some time to open things up (like clicking a Word document). I don't have any drives mapped, my computer is not joined to domain. I have multiple VPN connections that I connect to but they all have disabled default gateways. I tried using CC Cleaner or some Windows 7 Tweaks app to disable some things. I am power user using Visual Studio, Tortoise SVN and other developer/administration apps. Any non obvious ideas? Edit: So I've been trying to pinpoint where the issue comes from and it seems that straight after reboot Windows Explorer opens very fast, when I load 3-4 programs (Royal TS, Visual Studio, Outlook) it's noticeably slower and the more programs I have it gets worse. After I start closing programs it starts working better and if I leave 2 open it's fast again. I tried doing some research with DiskMon and other programs from sysinternals but couldn't find anything suspicious. Below are stats during normal usage with a lots of programs open: - Ram usage with a lot of programs open and no swap file (i disabled it for testing): 6.95GB - CPU usage: 15%, none of the cores takes more then 50% (I have VS 2010 open x 4) HD Tune Pro: OCZ-VERTEX3 MI Benchmark Test capacity: full Read transfer rate Transfer Rate Minimum : 363.9 MB/s Transfer Rate Maximum : 505.5 MB/s Transfer Rate Average : Access Time : Burst Rate : CPU Usage : HD Tune Pro: OCZ-VERTEX3 MI File Benchmark Drive C: Transfer rate test File Size: 500 MB Sequential read 484102 KB/s Sequential write 444714 KB/s Random read 7779 IOPS Random write 16888 IOPS Random read (queue depth = 32) 73007 IOPS Random write (queue depth = 32) 69790 IOPS HD Tune Pro: OCZ-VERTEX3 MI Random Access Test capacity: full Read test Transfer size operations / sec avg. access time max. access time avg. speed 512 bytes 3260 IOPS 0.306 ms 2.106 ms 1.592 MB/s 4 KB 4161 IOPS 0.240 ms 2.006 ms 16.256 MB/s 64 KB 2382 IOPS 0.419 ms 2.367 ms 148.934 MB/s 1 MB 449 IOPS 2.225 ms 4.197 ms 449.407 MB/s Random 809 IOPS 1.235 ms 6.551 ms 410.527 MB/s HD Tune Pro: OCZ-VERTEX3 MI Extra Tests Test capacity: full Random seek 3975 IOPS 0.252 ms 1.941 MB/s Random seek 4 KB 4245 IOPS 0.236 ms 16.583 MB/s Butterfly seek 4086 IOPS 0.245 ms 1.995 MB/s Random seek / size 64 KB 3812 IOPS 0.262 ms 58.606 MB/s Random seek / size 8 MB 120 IOPS 8.348 ms 485.737 MB/s Sequential outer 4524 IOPS 0.221 ms 282.721 MB/s Sequential middle 4429 IOPS 0.226 ms 276.818 MB/s Sequential inner 5504 IOPS 0.182 ms 344.000 MB/s Burst rate 4472 IOPS 0.224 ms 279.475 MB/s

    Read the article

  • SQL server queries are really slow only on first run

    - by JoelFan
    Somewhat strange problem... when I start my .NET app for the first time after rebooting my machine, the SQL Server queries are really slow... when I pause the debugger, I notice that it's hanging on getting the response from the query. This only happens when connecting to a remote SQL server (2008)... if I connect to one on my local machine, it's fine. Also, if I restart the app, it works fast, even off the remote SQL server, and subsequent runs are also fine. The only problem is when I connect to a remote SQL server for the first time after rebooting my machine. What's more, I have even noticed this same exact behavior with a 3rd party app (also .NET) that also connects to a remote SQL server. Another piece of info... this has only started hapenning since I upgraded my machine from XP to Win7 (64 bit). Also, other developers on my team who upgraded to Win7 are seeing the same behavior (both with the app we're developing and the 3rd party .NET app). (copied from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2014814/sql-server-queries-are-really-slow-only-on-first-run )

    Read the article

  • Best way to monitor a Grid of computers?

    - by marc.riera
    I've installed Sun Grid Engine on 10 nodes, and one virtual master host. Now I have to monitor all the resources prior to launching it into production, but I don't know which is the best way. I've tried using xml-qstat, but it seems unstable. Any tips or suggestions? Anyone got experience on this? thanks.

    Read the article

  • Page cache flushing behavior under heavy append load

    - by Bryce
    I'm trying to understand the behavior of the Linux pdflush daemon when: The page cache is initially pretty much empty There is a large amount of free memory The system starts undergoing heavy write load My understanding right now is that the vm.dirty_ratio and vm.dirty_background_ratio that control page cache flushing behavior are with respect to the present size of the page cache, which means that my writes will flush earlier than they would if the page cache was pre-populated (even with dummy data from some random file), and thus throughput will be lower. Is this accurate?

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu server very slow out of the blue sky (Rails, passenger, nginx)

    - by snitko
    I run Ubuntu server 8.04 on Linode with multiple Rails apps under Passenger + nginx. Today I've noticed it takes quite a lot of time to load a page (5-10 secs). And it's not only websites, ssh seems to be affected too. Having no clue why this may be happening, I started to check different things. I checked how the log files are rotated, I checked if there's enough free disk space and memory. I also checked IO rate, here's the output: $ iostat avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.57 0.16 99.07 Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn xvda 2.25 39.50 16.08 147042 59856 xvdb 0.00 0.05 0.00 192 0 xvdc 2.20 25.93 24.93 96530 92808 xvdd 0.01 0.12 0.00 434 16 xvde 0.04 0.23 0.35 858 1304 xvdf 0.37 0.31 4.12 1162 15352 Rebooting didn't help either. Any ideas where should I be looking?

    Read the article

  • MySQL on Linux out of memory

    - by Sunrays
    OS: Redhat Enterprise Linux Server Release 5.3 (Tikanga) Architecture: Intel Xeon 64Bit MySQL Server 5.5.20 Enterprise Server advanced edition. Application: Liferay. My database size is 200MB. RAM is 64GB. The memory consumption increases gradually and we run out of memory. Then only rebooting releases all the memory, but then process of memory consumption starts again and reaches 63-64GB in less than a day. Parameters detail: key_buffer_size=16M innodb_buffer_pool_size=3GB inndb_buffer_pool_instances=3 max_connections=1000 innodb_flush_method=O_DIRECT innodb_change_buffering=inserts read_buffer_size=2M read_rnd_buffer_size=256K It's a serious production server issue that I am facing. What could be the reason behind this and how to resolve. This is the report of 2pm today, after Linux was rebooted yesterday @ around 10pm. Output of free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 64455 22053 42402 0 1544 1164 -/+ buffers/cache: 19343 45112 Swap: 74998 0 74998 Output of vmstat 2 5 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu------ r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st 0 0 0 43423976 1583700 1086616 0 0 1 173 22 27 1 1 98 0 0 2 0 0 43280200 1583712 1228636 0 0 0 146 1265 491 2 2 96 1 0 0 0 0 43421940 1583724 1087160 0 0 0 138 1469 738 2 1 97 0 0 1 0 0 43422604 1583728 1086736 0 0 0 5816 1615 934 1 1 97 0 0 0 0 0 43422372 1583732 1086752 0 0 0 2784 1323 545 2 1 97 0 0 Output of top -n 3 -b top - 14:16:22 up 16:32, 5 users, load average: 0.79, 0.77, 0.93 Tasks: 345 total, 1 running, 344 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 1.0%us, 0.9%sy, 0.0%ni, 98.1%id, 0.1%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 66002772k total, 22656292k used, 43346480k free, 1582152k buffers Swap: 76798724k total, 0k used, 76798724k free, 1163616k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 6434 mysql 15 0 4095m 841m 5500 S 113.5 1.3 426:53.69 mysqld 1 root 15 0 10344 680 572 S 0.0 0.0 0:03.09 init 2 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 migration/0 3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0 4 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0 5 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 migration/1 6 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/1 7 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/1 8 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/2 9 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/2 10 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/2 11 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/3 12 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/3 13 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/3 14 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/4 15 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/4 16 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/4 17 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/5 18 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/5 19 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/5 20 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/6 21 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/6 22 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/6 23 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/7 24 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/7 25 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/7 26 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/8 27 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/8 28 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/8 29 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/9 30 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/9 31 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/9 32 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/10 33 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/10 34 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/10 35 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/11 36 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/11 37 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/11 38 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/12 39 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/12 40 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/12 41 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/13 42 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/13 43 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/13 44 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/14 45 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/14 46 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/14 47 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/15 48 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 ksoftirqd/15 49 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/15 50 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/16 51 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/16 52 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/16 53 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/17 54 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/17 55 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/17 56 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/18 57 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/18 58 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/18 59 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/19 60 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/19 61 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/19 62 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/20 63 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/20 64 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/20 65 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/21 66 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/21 67 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/21 68 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/22 69 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/22 70 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/22 71 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/23 72 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/23 73 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/23 74 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 events/0 75 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/1 76 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/2 77 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/3 78 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/4 79 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/5 80 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/6 81 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/7 82 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/8 83 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/9 84 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/10 85 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/11 86 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 events/12 87 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/13 88 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/14 89 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/15 90 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/16 91 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/17 92 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/18 93 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/19 94 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/20 95 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/21 96 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/22 97 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/23 98 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 khelper 615 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread 643 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/0 644 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/1 645 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/2 646 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/3 647 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/4 648 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/5 649 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/6 650 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/7 651 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/8 652 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/9 653 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/10 654 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/11 655 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/12 656 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/13 657 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/14 658 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/15 659 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/16 660 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/17 661 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/18 662 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/19 663 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/20 664 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/21 665 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/22 666 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/23 667 root 17 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid 840 root 17 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/0 841 root 18 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/1 842 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/2 843 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/3 844 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/4 845 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/5 846 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/6 847 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/7 848 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/8 849 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/9 850 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/10 851 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/11 852 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/12 853 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/13 854 root 17 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/14 855 root 18 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/15 856 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/16 857 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/17 858 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/18 859 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/19 860 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/20 861 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/21 862 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/22 863 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/23 866 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd 868 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod 1118 root 23 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush 1119 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.11 pdflush 1120 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kswapd0 1121 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kswapd1 1122 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0 1123 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/1 1124 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/2 1125 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/3 1126 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/4 1127 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/5 1128 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/6 1129 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/7 1130 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/8 1131 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/9 1132 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/10 1133 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/11 1134 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/12 1135 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/13 1136 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/14 1137 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/15 1138 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/16 1139 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/17 1140 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/18 1141 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/19 1142 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/20 1143 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/21 1144 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/22 1145 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/23 1308 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kpsmoused 1566 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/0 1567 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.27 ata/1 1568 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.39 ata/2 1569 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.07 ata/3 1570 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.72 ata/4 1571 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/5 1572 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.15 ata/6 1573 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.07 ata/7 1574 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.06 ata/8 1575 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/9 1576 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/10 1577 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/11 1578 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/12 1579 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.14 ata/13 1580 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.56 ata/14 1581 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.04 ata/15 1582 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.40 ata/16 1583 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/17 1584 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.11 ata/18 1585 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.03 ata/19 1586 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 ata/20 1587 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/21 1588 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/22 1589 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/23 1590 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata_aux 1616 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:17.20 scsi_eh_0 1617 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_1 1668 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_2 1669 root 0 -20 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 qla2xxx_2_dpc 1670 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_wq_2 1671 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 fc_wq_2 1672 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 fc_dl_2 1673 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_3 1674 root 0 -20 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 qla2xxx_3_dpc 1675 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_wq_3 1676 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 fc_wq_3 1677 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 fc_dl_3 1728 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kstriped 1829 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 1:09.14 kjournald 1857 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kauditd 1891 root 11 -4 13008 1188 388 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.40 udevd 4555 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/0 4556 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/1 4557 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/2 4558 root 14 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/3 4559 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/4 4560 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/5 4561 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/6 4562 root 17 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/7 4563 root 18 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/8 4564 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/9 4565 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/10 4566 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/11 4567 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/12 4568 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/13 4569 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/14 4570 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/15 4571 root 14 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/16 4572 root 14 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/17 4573 root 14 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/18 4574 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/19 4575 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/20 4576 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/21 4577 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/22 4578 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/23 4579 root 18 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpath_handlerd 4734 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kjournald 4736 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:04.82 kjournald 4744 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kjournald 5238 root RT 0 87584 3648 2768 S 0.0 0.0 0:03.60 multipathd 5537 root 11 -4 27328 812 580 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.14 auditd 5539 root 7 -8 81804 768 616 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.04 audispd 5564 root 15 0 5904 632 512 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.10 syslogd 5567 root 15 0 3800 432 344 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 klogd 5579 root 18 0 10728 384 244 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.42 irqbalance 5592 rpc 18 0 8048 584 464 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 portmap 5625 root 18 0 11032 768 632 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpc.statd 5681 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/0 5682 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/1 5683 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/2 5684 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/3 5685 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/4 5686 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/5 5687 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/6 5688 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/7 5689 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/8 5690 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/9 5691 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/10 5692 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/11

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146  | Next Page >