Search Results

Search found 1073 results on 43 pages for 'transport'.

Page 17/43 | < Previous Page | 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24  | Next Page >

  • allow infiniband for non root users

    - by user1219721
    I got Infiniband running on RHEL 6.3 [root@master ~]# ibv_devinfo hca_id: mthca0 transport: InfiniBand (0) fw_ver: 4.7.927 node_guid: 0017:08ff:ffd0:6f1c sys_image_guid: 0017:08ff:ffd0:6f1f vendor_id: 0x08f1 vendor_part_id: 25208 hw_ver: 0xA0 board_id: VLT0060010001 phys_port_cnt: 2 port: 1 state: PORT_ACTIVE (4) max_mtu: 2048 (4) active_mtu: 2048 (4) sm_lid: 2 port_lid: 3 port_lmc: 0x00 link_layer: InfiniBand port: 2 state: PORT_DOWN (1) max_mtu: 2048 (4) active_mtu: 512 (2) sm_lid: 0 port_lid: 0 port_lmc: 0x00 link_layer: InfiniBand but it's only working as root. when trying from a non-super user, I got nothing : [nicolas@master ~]$ ibv_devices device node GUID ------ ---------------- mthca0 001708ffffd06f1c So, how to allow regular users to use infiniband ?

    Read the article

  • Capture Outgoing Email to One Mailbox or Account on Linux

    - by futureal
    I am looking to see if anything exists that would allow us to capture all outgoing email on a machine -- for example, in a staging environment -- and drop it in a single place, which ideally would be something we could check with a mail client. Currently we're doing this on the software level (if environment is staging, rewrite address) which is a bit ugly and leads to errors. The servers are currently on Debian Linux, using exim as the mail transport. Open to any and all suggestions!

    Read the article

  • How to make a JBoss service to handle Protocol Buffers directly?

    - by mlaverd
    Hello everyone, I'm interested in building a JBoss service. Because I'm reusing some existing code, the service must be able to talk SSL/TLS and Protocol Buffers. The documentation I see on the JBoss wiki makes it look like services have their transport and data interpretation handled by JBoss itself. Is it really the case? How could I implement this requirement?

    Read the article

  • Exchange 2010 Setup

    - by Hemal
    Hello, I am testing MS exchange 2010 SP1 for our firm. It's new exchnage installation as we don't have any previous versions. I installed Exchange 2010 with SP1 on Windows server 2008 SP2 (64-bit) with typical settings which has 3 server roles: hub transport, mailbox server, client access. But now I got stuck how to finish basic configuaration to get email flow from/to my server. I really appreciate any response to help me with the next steps.. Thank you in advance for any replies, Hemal

    Read the article

  • Exim To Include Internal Email When Sending

    - by user219951
    I wonder if you can help me out... at the moment were using exim to relay our emails to an smtp_relay. The only problem is if the user exists and has an email address it won't exit the server and send them mail using our relay. I need it to go to the relay even if it's an internal email address. Hope that make sense, this is how we have got our relay setup at the moment smart_route: driver = manualroute domains = !+local_domains transport = remote_smtp_smtpauth route_list = * smtp.sendgrid.net:587 Thanks

    Read the article

  • How can I backup my windows XP drivers?

    - by Tal Galili
    Hello all, I've got a new (well, used) laptop. I wish to format and reinstall the windows OS on it. On the machine I've got several drivers which I would like to transport to the new machine, but I don't have the original drivers CD's. Is there a software that can backup my drivers, and then later let me reinstall them on the new windows installation? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to transision from exchange 2003 to 2010

    - by John
    I want to upgrade exchange from 2003 to 2010, but now i have just one server having exchange 2003 mailbox, and its just working with internal network. for receiving and sending email to outside, we have hosted mail server and we use Native POP3 to download mails from hosted server to our exchange server. and now we want to have 2 server. and also want to deploy edge transport role to send and receive mail from outside so what will be the best to upgrade to 2010 ?

    Read the article

  • wss4j: - Cannot find key for alias: monit

    - by feiroox
    Hi I'm using axis1.4 and wss4j. When I define in client-config.wsdd for WSDoAllSender and WSDoAllReceiver different signaturePropFiles where I have different key stores defined with different certificates, I'm able to have different certificates for sending and receiving. But when I use the same signaturePropFiles' with the same keystore. I get this message when I try to send a message: org.apache.ws.security.components.crypto.CryptoBase -- Cannot find key for alias: [monit] in keystore of type [jks] from provider [SUN version 1.5] with size [2] and aliases: {other, monit} - Error during Signature: ; nested exception is: org.apache.ws.security.WSSecurityException: Signature creation failed; nested exception is: java.lang.Exception: Cannot find key for alias: [monit] org.apache.ws.security.WSSecurityException: Error during Signature: ; nested exception is: org.apache.ws.security.WSSecurityException: Signature creation failed; nested exception is: java.lang.Exception: Cannot find key for alias: [monit] at org.apache.ws.security.action.SignatureAction.execute(SignatureAction.java:60) at org.apache.ws.security.handler.WSHandler.doSenderAction(WSHandler.java:202) at org.apache.ws.axis.security.WSDoAllSender.invoke(WSDoAllSender.java:168) at org.apache.axis.strategies.InvocationStrategy.visit(InvocationStrategy.java:32) at org.apache.axis.SimpleChain.doVisiting(SimpleChain.java:118) at org.apache.axis.SimpleChain.invoke(SimpleChain.java:83) at org.apache.axis.client.AxisClient.invoke(AxisClient.java:127) at org.apache.axis.client.Call.invokeEngine(Call.java:2784) at org.apache.axis.client.Call.invoke(Call.java:2767) at org.apache.axis.client.Call.invoke(Call.java:2443) at org.apache.axis.client.Call.invoke(Call.java:2366) at org.apache.axis.client.Call.invoke(Call.java:1812) at cz.ing.oopf.model.wsclient.ModelWebServiceSoapBindingStub.getStatus(ModelWebServiceSoapBindingStub.java:213) at cz.ing.oopf.wsgemonitor.monitor.util.MonitorUtil.checkStatus(MonitorUtil.java:18) at cz.ing.oopf.wsgemonitor.monitor.Test02WsMonitor.runTest(Test02WsMonitor.java:23) at cz.ing.oopf.wsgemonitor.Main.main(Main.java:75) Caused by: org.apache.ws.security.WSSecurityException: Signature creation failed; nested exception is: java.lang.Exception: Cannot find key for alias: [monit] at org.apache.ws.security.message.WSSecSignature.computeSignature(WSSecSignature.java:721) at org.apache.ws.security.message.WSSecSignature.build(WSSecSignature.java:780) at org.apache.ws.security.action.SignatureAction.execute(SignatureAction.java:57) ... 15 more Caused by: java.lang.Exception: Cannot find key for alias: [monit] at org.apache.ws.security.components.crypto.CryptoBase.getPrivateKey(CryptoBase.java:214) at org.apache.ws.security.message.WSSecSignature.computeSignature(WSSecSignature.java:713) ... 17 more How to have two certificates for wss4j in the same keystore? why it cannot find my certificate there when i have two certificates in one keystore. I have the same password for both certificates regarding PWCallback (CallbackHandler) My properties file: org.apache.ws.security.crypto.provider=org.apache.ws.security.components.crypto.Merlin org.apache.ws.security.crypto.merlin.keystore.type=jks org.apache.ws.security.crypto.merlin.keystore.password=keystore org.apache.ws.security.crypto.merlin.keystore.alias=monit org.apache.ws.security.crypto.merlin.alias.password=*** org.apache.ws.security.crypto.merlin.file=key.jks My client-config.wsdd: <deployment xmlns="http://xml.apache.org/axis/wsdd/" xmlns:java="http://xml.apache.org/axis/wsdd/providers/java"> <globalConfiguration> <requestFlow> <handler name="WSSecurity" type="java:org.apache.ws.axis.security.WSDoAllSender"> <parameter name="user" value="monit"/> <parameter name="passwordCallbackClass" value="cz.ing.oopf.common.ws.PWCallback"/> <parameter name="action" value="Signature"/> <parameter name="signaturePropFile" value="monit.properties"/> <parameter name="signatureKeyIdentifier" value="DirectReference" /> <parameter name="mustUnderstand" value="0"/> </handler> <handler type="java:org.apache.axis.handlers.JWSHandler"> <parameter name="scope" value="session"/> </handler> <handler type="java:org.apache.axis.handlers.JWSHandler"> <parameter name="scope" value="request"/> <parameter name="extension" value=".jwr"/> </handler> </requestFlow> <responseFlow> <handler name="DoSecurityReceiver" type="java:org.apache.ws.axis.security.WSDoAllReceiver"> <parameter name="user" value="other"/> <parameter name="passwordCallbackClass" value="cz.ing.oopf.common.ws.PWCallback"/> <parameter name="action" value="Signature"/> <parameter name="signaturePropFile" value="other.properties"/> <parameter name="signatureKeyIdentifier" value="DirectReference" /> </handler> </responseFlow> </globalConfiguration> <transport name="http" pivot="java:org.apache.axis.transport.http.HTTPSender"> </transport> </deployment> Listing from keytool: keytool -keystore monit-key.jks -v -list Enter keystore password: Keystore type: JKS Keystore provider: SUN Your keystore contains 2 entries Alias name: other Creation date: Jul 22, 2009 Entry type: PrivateKeyEntry Certificate chain length: 1 Certificate[1]: .... Alias name: monit Creation date: Oct 19, 2009 Entry type: trustedCertEntry

    Read the article

  • In apache cxf, How do i know the soap request message is gzip compressed?

    - by aspirant75
    I'm using Apache CXF to send soap message. in specific case, i have to send a soap message gzip compressed. Using log4j, i printed detailed info. would you let me know how i can know the message is gzip compressed and transfered to server. thanks in advance. Below is my java code for gzip and log info. java code Client cxfClient = ClientProxy.getClient(port); /** Logging Interceptor */ cxfClient.getInInterceptors().add(new GZIPInInterceptor()); cxfClient.getOutInterceptors().add(new GZIPOutInterceptor()); log info 20120814 18:56:15,351 DEBUG Interceptors contributed by bus: [] 20120814 18:56:15,351 DEBUG Interceptors contributed by client: [org.apache.cxf.transport.http.gzip.GZIPOutInterceptor@1682a53] 20120814 18:56:15,351 DEBUG Interceptors contributed by endpoint: [org.apache.cxf.interceptor.MessageSenderInterceptor@1b2d7df, org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.SwAOutInterceptor@7a9224, org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.WrapperClassOutInterceptor@110b640, org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.HolderOutInterceptor@2d59a3] 20120814 18:56:15,351 DEBUG Interceptors contributed by binding: [org.apache.cxf.interceptor.AttachmentOutInterceptor@158015a, org.apache.cxf.interceptor.StaxOutInterceptor@c0c8b5, org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor@b914b3, org.apache.cxf.interceptor.BareOutInterceptor@fdfc58, org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor@c22a3b, org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapOutInterceptor@1629e71] 20120814 18:56:15,351 DEBUG Interceptors contributed by databinding: [] 20120814 18:56:15,357 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.transport.http.gzip.GZIPOutInterceptor@1682a53 to phase prepare-send 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.MessageSenderInterceptor@1b2d7df to phase prepare-send 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.SwAOutInterceptor@7a9224 to phase pre-logical 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.WrapperClassOutInterceptor@110b640 to phase pre-logical 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.HolderOutInterceptor@2d59a3 to phase pre-logical 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.AttachmentOutInterceptor@158015a to phase pre-stream 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.StaxOutInterceptor@c0c8b5 to phase pre-stream 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor@b914b3 to phase pre-logical 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.BareOutInterceptor@fdfc58 to phase marshal 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor@c22a3b to phase post-logical 20120814 18:56:15,359 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapOutInterceptor@1629e71 to phase write 20120814 18:56:15,360 DEBUG Chain org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain@31688f was created. Current flow: pre-logical [HolderOutInterceptor, SwAOutInterceptor, WrapperClassOutInterceptor, SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor] post-logical [SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor] prepare-send [MessageSenderInterceptor, GZIPOutInterceptor] pre-stream [AttachmentOutInterceptor, StaxOutInterceptor] write [SoapOutInterceptor] marshal [BareOutInterceptor] 20120814 18:56:15,361 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.HolderOutInterceptor@2d59a3 20120814 18:56:15,361 DEBUG op: [OperationInfo: {https://asp.cyberbooking.co.kr/TopasApiSvc/services}getAirAvail] 20120814 18:56:15,361 DEBUG op.hasOutput(): true 20120814 18:56:15,361 DEBUG op.getOutput().size(): 2 20120814 18:56:15,361 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.SwAOutInterceptor@7a9224 20120814 18:56:15,364 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.WrapperClassOutInterceptor@110b640 20120814 18:56:15,364 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor@b914b3 20120814 18:56:15,365 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor@c22a3b 20120814 18:56:15,365 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.MessageSenderInterceptor@1b2d7df 20120814 18:56:15,365 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.MessageSenderInterceptor$MessageSenderEndingInterceptor@dc9065 to phase prepare-send-ending 20120814 18:56:15,366 DEBUG Chain org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain@31688f was modified. Current flow: pre-logical [HolderOutInterceptor, SwAOutInterceptor, WrapperClassOutInterceptor, SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor] post-logical [SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor] prepare-send [MessageSenderInterceptor, GZIPOutInterceptor] pre-stream [AttachmentOutInterceptor, StaxOutInterceptor] write [SoapOutInterceptor] marshal [BareOutInterceptor] prepare-send-ending [MessageSenderEndingInterceptor] 20120814 18:56:15,366 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.transport.http.gzip.GZIPOutInterceptor@1682a53 20120814 18:56:15,366 DEBUG Requestor role, so gzip enabled 20120814 18:56:15,366 DEBUG gzip permitted: YES 20120814 18:56:15,367 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.AttachmentOutInterceptor@158015a 20120814 18:56:15,367 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.StaxOutInterceptor@c0c8b5 20120814 18:56:15,370 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.StaxOutInterceptor$StaxOutEndingInterceptor@1f488f1 to phase pre-stream-ending 20120814 18:56:15,370 DEBUG Chain org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain@31688f was modified. Current flow: pre-logical [HolderOutInterceptor, SwAOutInterceptor, WrapperClassOutInterceptor, SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor] post-logical [SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor] prepare-send [MessageSenderInterceptor, GZIPOutInterceptor] pre-stream [AttachmentOutInterceptor, StaxOutInterceptor] write [SoapOutInterceptor] marshal [BareOutInterceptor] pre-stream-ending [StaxOutEndingInterceptor] prepare-send-ending [MessageSenderEndingInterceptor] 20120814 18:56:15,370 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapOutInterceptor@1629e71 20120814 18:56:15,383 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapOutInterceptor$SoapOutEndingInterceptor@1ce663c to phase write-ending 20120814 18:56:15,384 DEBUG Chain org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain@31688f was modified. Current flow: pre-logical [HolderOutInterceptor, SwAOutInterceptor, WrapperClassOutInterceptor, SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor] post-logical [SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor] prepare-send [MessageSenderInterceptor, GZIPOutInterceptor] pre-stream [AttachmentOutInterceptor, StaxOutInterceptor] write [SoapOutInterceptor] marshal [BareOutInterceptor] write-ending [SoapOutEndingInterceptor] pre-stream-ending [StaxOutEndingInterceptor] prepare-send-ending [MessageSenderEndingInterceptor] 20120814 18:56:15,384 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.BareOutInterceptor@fdfc58 20120814 18:56:15,387 DEBUG Compressing message. 20120814 18:56:15,388 DEBUG Sending POST Message with Headers to http://test.co.kr:80/###/###/###Conduit :{https://test.co.kr/###/####}###.http-conduit Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8 20120814 18:56:15,388 DEBUG SOAPAction: "getAirAvail" 20120814 18:56:15,388 DEBUG Accept: */* 20120814 18:56:15,388 DEBUG Accept-Encoding: gzip;q=1.0, identity; q=0.5, *;q=0 20120814 18:56:15,388 DEBUG Content-Encoding: gzip 20120814 18:56:15,388 DEBUG No Trust Decider for Conduit '{https://test.co.kr/###/###}###.http-conduit'. An afirmative Trust Decision is assumed. 20120814 18:56:15,394 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapOutInterceptor$SoapOutEndingInterceptor@1ce663c 20120814 18:56:15,394 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.StaxOutInterceptor$StaxOutEndingInterceptor@1f488f1 20120814 18:56:15,394 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.MessageSenderInterceptor$MessageSenderEndingInterceptor@dc9065 20120814 18:56:15,459 DEBUG Response Code: 200 Conduit: {https://test.co.kr/###/###}###.http-conduit 20120814 18:56:15,459 DEBUG Content length: 11034 20120814 18:56:15,459 DEBUG Header fields: null: [HTTP/1.1 200 OK] Content-Language: [ko-KR] Date: [Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:56:15 GMT] Content-Length: [11034] P3P: [CP='CAO PSA CONi OTR OUR DEM ONL'] Expires: [Thu, 01 Dec 1994 16:00:00 GMT] Keep-Alive: [timeout=10, max=100] Set-Cookie: [WMONID=mL6rq_Irpa_; Expires=Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:56:15 GMT; Path=/] Connection: [Keep-Alive] Content-Type: [text/xml; charset=utf-8] Server: [IBM_HTTP_Server] Cache-Control: [no-cache="set-cookie, set-cookie2"]

    Read the article

  • WCF: SecurityNegotiationException when using client

    - by bradhe
    So I've been trying to set up certificate authentication for my clients and services. The eventual goal is to partition data based on the certificate a client connects with (i.e. the certificate becomes their credentials in to the greater system and their data is partitioned based on these credentials). I have been able to set it up successfully on both the client and the server side. I have created a certificate and a private key, installed them on my computer, and set up my server such that 1) it has a certificate-based service credential and 2) if a client connects without providing a certificate-based credential an exception is thrown. What I then did was create a simple client and add a certificate credential to the configuration and try to call a simple operation on the service. It looks like the client connects OK, and it looks like the certificate is accepted by the server, but I do get this: SecurityNegotiationException: "The caller was not authenticated by the service." That seems rather ambiguous to me. Note that I am using wsHttpBinding, which supposedly defaults to Windows auth for transport security...but all of these processes are being run as my user account as I'm running in my debug environment. Here is my server configuration: <system.serviceModel> <bindings> <wsHttpBinding> <binding name="MyServiceBinding"> <security mode="Message"> <transport clientCredentialType="None"/> <message clientCredentialType="Certificate"/> </security> </binding> </wsHttpBinding> </bindings> <services> <service behaviorConfiguration="MyServiceBehavior" name="MyService"> <endpoint binding="wsHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="MyServiceBinding" contract="IMyContract"/> <endpoint binding="mexHttpBinding" address="mex" contract="IMetadataExchange"> <identity> <dns value="localhost"/> </identity> </endpoint> </service> </services> <behaviors> <serviceBehaviors> <behavior name="MyServiceBehavior"> <serviceMetadata httpGetEnabled="true" policyVersion="Policy15" /> <serviceDebug includeExceptionDetailInFaults="false" /> <serviceCredentials> <serviceCertificate storeLocation="CurrentUser" storeName="My" x509FindType="FindBySubjectName" findValue="tmp123"/> </serviceCredentials> </behavior> </serviceBehaviors> </behaviors> <serviceHostingEnvironment multipleSiteBindingsEnabled="true" /> </system.serviceModel> Here is my client config -- note that I'm using the same cert for the client that I use on the service: <system.serviceModel> <bindings> <wsHttpBinding> <binding name="WSHttpBinding_IMyService" closeTimeout="00:01:00" openTimeout="00:01:00" receiveTimeout="00:10:00" sendTimeout="00:01:00" bypassProxyOnLocal="false" transactionFlow="false" hostNameComparisonMode="StrongWildcard" maxBufferPoolSize="524288" maxReceivedMessageSize="65536" messageEncoding="Text" textEncoding="utf-8" useDefaultWebProxy="true" allowCookies="false"> <readerQuotas maxDepth="32" maxStringContentLength="8192" maxArrayLength="16384" maxBytesPerRead="4096" maxNameTableCharCount="16384"/> <reliableSession ordered="true" inactivityTimeout="00:10:00" enabled="false"/> <security mode="Message"> <!--<transport clientCredentialType="Windows" proxyCredentialType="None" realm=""/>--> <message clientCredentialType="Certificate" negotiateServiceCredential="true" algorithmSuite="Default"/> </security> </binding> </wsHttpBinding> </bindings> <client> <endpoint address="http://localhost:50120/UserServices.svc" binding="wsHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="WSHttpBinding_IMyService" behaviorConfiguration="IMyService_Behavior" contract="UserServices.IUserServices" name="WSHttpBinding_IMyService"> <identity> <certificate encodedValue="Some RSA stuff"/> </identity> </endpoint> </client> <behaviors> <endpointBehaviors> <behavior name="IMyService_Behavior"> <clientCredentials> <clientCertificate storeLocation="CurrentUser" storeName="My" x509FindType="FindBySubjectName" findValue="tmp123"/> </clientCredentials> </behavior> </endpointBehaviors> </behaviors> </system.serviceModel> Can anyone please help provide some insight as to what might be up here? Thanks,

    Read the article

  • Duplex communication using NetTcpBinding - ContractFilter mismatch?

    - by Shaul
    I'm making slow and steady progress towards having a duplex communication channel open between a client and a server, using NetTcpBinding. (FYI, you can observe my newbie progress here and here!) I'm now at the stage where I have successfully connected to my server, through the server's firewall, and the client can make requests of the server. In the other direction, however, things aren't quite so happy. It works fine when testing on my own machine, but when testing over the internet, when I try to initiate a callback from the server side, I get an error: The message with Action 'http://MyWebService/IWebService/HelloWorld' cannot be processed at the receiver, due to a ContractFilter mismatch at the EndpointDispatcher. This may be because of either a contract mismatch (mismatched Actions between sender and receiver) or a binding/security mismatch between the sender and the receiver. Check that sender and receiver have the same contract and the same binding (including security requirements, e.g. Message, Transport, None). Here are some of the key bits of code. First, the web interface: [ServiceContract(Namespace = "http://MyWebService", SessionMode = SessionMode.Required, CallbackContract = typeof(ISiteServiceExternal))] public interface IWebService { [OperationContract] void Register(long customerID); } public interface ISiteServiceExternal { [OperationContract] string HelloWorld(); } Then, on the client side (I was fiddling with these attributes without really knowing what I'm doing): [ServiceBehavior(InstanceContextMode = InstanceContextMode.PerSession, Namespace="http://MyWebService")] class SiteServer : IWebServiceCallback { string IWebServiceCallback.HelloWorld() { return "Hello World!"; } ... } So what am I doing wrong here? EDIT: Adding app.config code. From server: <system.serviceModel> <diagnostics> <messageLogging logMalformedMessages="true" logMessagesAtServiceLevel="true" logMessagesAtTransportLevel="true" logEntireMessage="true" maxMessagesToLog="1000" maxSizeOfMessageToLog="524288" /> </diagnostics> <behaviors> <serviceBehaviors> <behavior name="mex"> <serviceDebug includeExceptionDetailInFaults="true"/> <serviceMetadata/> </behavior> </serviceBehaviors> </behaviors> <services> <service name ="MyWebService.WebService" behaviorConfiguration="mex"> <endpoint address="net.tcp://localhost:8000" binding="netTcpBinding" contract="MyWebService.IWebService" bindingConfiguration="TestBinding" name="MyEndPoint"></endpoint> <endpoint address ="mex" binding="mexTcpBinding" name="MEX" contract="IMetadataExchange"/> <host> <baseAddresses> <add baseAddress="net.tcp://localhost:8000"/> </baseAddresses> </host> </service> </services> <bindings> <netTcpBinding> <binding name="TestBinding" maxBufferPoolSize="524288" maxReceivedMessageSize="65536" portSharingEnabled="false"> <readerQuotas maxDepth="32" maxStringContentLength ="8192" maxArrayLength ="16384" maxBytesPerRead="4096" maxNameTableCharCount="16384"/> <security mode="None"/> </binding> </netTcpBinding> </bindings> </system.serviceModel> and on the client side: <system.serviceModel> <bindings> <netTcpBinding> <binding name="MyEndPoint" closeTimeout="00:01:00" openTimeout="00:01:00" receiveTimeout="00:10:00" sendTimeout="00:01:00" transactionFlow="false" transferMode="Buffered" transactionProtocol="OleTransactions" hostNameComparisonMode="StrongWildcard" listenBacklog="10" maxBufferPoolSize="524288" maxBufferSize="65536" maxConnections="10" maxReceivedMessageSize="65536"> <readerQuotas maxDepth="32" maxStringContentLength="8192" maxArrayLength="16384" maxBytesPerRead="4096" maxNameTableCharCount="16384" /> <reliableSession ordered="true" inactivityTimeout="00:10:00" enabled="false" /> <security mode="None"> <transport clientCredentialType="Windows" protectionLevel="EncryptAndSign"> <extendedProtectionPolicy policyEnforcement="Never" /> </transport> <message clientCredentialType="Windows" /> </security> </binding> </netTcpBinding> </bindings> <client> <endpoint address="net.tcp://mydomain.gotdns.com:8000/" binding="netTcpBinding" bindingConfiguration="MyEndPoint" contract="IWebService" name="MyEndPoint" /> </client> </system.serviceModel>

    Read the article

  • Microsoft Team Foundation Server 2010 Service Pack 1

    - by javarg
    Last week Microsoft has released the first Service Pack for Team Foundation Server. Several issues have been fixed and included in this patch. Check out the list of fixes here. Cool stuff has been shipped with this new released, such as the expected Project Service Integration. PS: note that these annoying bugs has been fixed: Team Explorer: When you use a Visual Studio 2005 or a Visual Studio 2008 client, you encounter a red "X" on the reporting node of the team explorer. Source Control: You receive the error "System.IO.IOException: Unable to read data from the transport connection: The connection was closed." when you try to download a source

    Read the article

  • The Ins and Outs of Effective Smart Grid Data Management

    - by caroline.yu
    Oracle Utilities and Accenture recently sponsored a one-hour Web cast entitled, "The Ins and Outs of Effective Smart Grid Data Management." Oracle and Accenture created this Web cast to help utilities better understand the types of data collected over smart grid networks and the issues associated with mapping out a coherent information management strategy. The Web cast also addressed important points that utilities must consider with the imminent flood of data that both present and next-generation smart grid components will generate. The three speakers, including Oracle Utilities' Brad Williams, focused on the key factors associated with taking the millions of data points captured in real time and implementing the strategies, frameworks and technologies that enable utilities to process, store, analyze, visualize, integrate, transport and transform data into the information required to deliver targeted business benefits. The Web cast replay is available here. The Web cast slides are available here.

    Read the article

  • Is Linear Tape File System (LTFS) Best For Transportable Storage?

    - by rickramsey
    Those of us in tape storage engineering take a lot of pride in what we do, but understand that tape is the right answer to a storage problem only some of the time. And, unfortunately for a storage medium with such a long history, it has built up a few preconceived notions that are no longer valid. When I hear customers debate whether to implement tape vs. disk, one of the common strikes against tape is its perceived lack of usability. If you could go back a few generations of corporate acquisitions, you would discover that StorageTek engineers recognized this problem and started developing a solution where a tape drive could look just like a memory stick to a user. The goal was to not have to care about where files were on the cartridge, but to simply see the list of files that were on the tape, and click on them to open them up. Eventually, our friends in tape over at IBM built upon our work at StorageTek and Sun Microsystems and released the Linear Tape File System (LTFS) feature for the current LTO5 generation of tape drives as an open specification. LTFS is really a wonderful feature and we’re proud to have taken part in its beginnings and, as you’ll soon read, its future. Today we offer LTFS-Open Edition, which is free for you to use in your in Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.5 environment - not only on your LTO5 drives, but also on your Oracle StorageTek T10000C drives. You can download it free from Oracle and try it out. LTFS does exactly what its forefathers imagined. Now you can see immediately which files are on a cartridge. LTFS does this by splitting a cartridge into two partitions. The first holds all of the necessary metadata to create a directory structure for you to easily view the contents of the cartridge. The second partition holds all of the files themselves. When tape media is loaded onto a drive, a complete file system image is presented to the user. Adding files to a cartridge can be as simple as a drag-and-drop just as you do today on your laptop when transferring files from your hard drive to a thumb drive or with standard POSIX file operations. You may be thinking all of this sounds nice, but asking, “when will I actually use it?” As I mentioned at the beginning, tape is not the right solution all of the time. However, if you ever need to physically move data between locations, tape storage with LTFS should be your most cost-effective and reliable answer. I will give you a few use cases examples of when LTFS can be utilized. Media and Entertainment (M&E), Oil and Gas (O&G), and other industries have a strong need for their storage to be transportable. For example, an O&G company hunting for new oil deposits in remote locations takes very large underground seismic images which need to be shipped back to a central data center. M&E operations conduct similar activities when shooting video for productions. M&E companies also often transfers files to third-parties for editing and other activities. These companies have three highly flawed options for transporting data: electronic transfer, disk storage transport, or tape storage transport. The first option, electronic transfer, is impractical because of the expense of the bandwidth required to transfer multi-terabyte files reliably and efficiently. If there’s one place that has bandwidth, it’s your local post office so many companies revert to physically shipping storage media. Typically, M&E companies rely on transporting disk storage between sites even though it, too, is expensive. Tape storage should be the preferred format because as IDC points out, “Tape is more suitable for physical transportation of large amounts of data as it is less vulnerable to mechanical damage during transportation compared with disk" (See note 1, below). However, tape storage has not been used in the past because of the restrictions created by proprietary formats. A tape may only be readable if both the sender and receiver have the same proprietary application used to write the file. In addition, the workflows may be slowed by the need to read the entire tape cartridge during recall. LTFS solves both of these problems, clearing the way for tape to become the standard platform for transferring large files. LTFS is open and, as long as you’ve downloaded the free reader from our website or that of anyone in the LTO consortium, you can read the data. So if a movie studio ships a scene to a third-party partner to add, for example, sounds effects or a music score, it doesn’t have to care what technology the third-party has. If it’s written back to an LTFS-formatted tape cartridge, it can be read. Some tape vendors like to claim LTFS is a “standard,” but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. It’s a specification at this point, not a standard. That said, we’re already seeing application vendors create functionality to write in an LTFS format based on the specification. And it’s my belief that both customers and the tape storage industry will see the most benefit if we all follow the same path. As such, we have volunteered to lead the way in making LTFS a standard first with the Storage Network Industry Association (SNIA), and eventually through to standard bodies such as American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Expect to hear good news soon about our efforts. So, if storage transportability is one of your requirements, I recommend giving LTFS a look. It makes tape much more user-friendly and it’s free, which allows tape to maintain all of its cost advantages over disk! Note 1 - IDC Report. April, 2011. “IDC’s Archival Storage Solutions Taxonomy, 2011” - Brian Zents Website Newsletter Facebook Twitter

    Read the article

  • Replica Myst Book Actually Plays all the Myst Games

    - by Jason Fitzpatrick
    Runaway 1990s gaming hit Myst features books that had the power to transport you to other worlds. One dedicated fan has gone so far as to make a book that, when opened, transports you to the Myst universe. From hand-crafting the book itself to populating the guts of the book with carefully selected (and frequently modified) parts, Mike Ando left no part of his project uncustomized. The end result is a stunning mod and tribute to the Myst franchise–a beautiful book you can open and play through all the games in the series. Check out the video above to see it in action then hit up the link below to check out Mike’s build album. Myst Book [via Hack A Day] What Is the Purpose of the “Do Not Cover This Hole” Hole on Hard Drives? How To Log Into The Desktop, Add a Start Menu, and Disable Hot Corners in Windows 8 HTG Explains: Why You Shouldn’t Use a Task Killer On Android

    Read the article

  • Do I need to install a package (openSWAN or strongSWAN maybe) to use ipsec?

    - by user68886
    I want to connect to a windows share that only accepts ipsec transport mode. I have a list of security policies and a shared secret. I've skimmed through the man page on ipsec.conf on the web and it seems to be the place to put these polices. If ipsec is part of the kernel (and I think it is, I'm using Ubuntu 12.04) do I need to install some other package in order to get this working? I'm guessing it's either openSWAN or strongSWAN but don't know the difference.

    Read the article

  • B2B 11.1.1.2 no proxy support for FTP

    - by nestor.reyes
    Have you seen this error while trying to use a proxy for a delivery channel within B2B?Transport error: Proxy type must be defined when Proxy host has been specified. Proxy type must be defined when Proxy host has been specified.If so, you are not alone. FTP does not support proxy.  Also note the following entry in the release notes. http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E15523_01/relnotes.1111/e10133/b2b.htm#CHDJAFBC 15.1.45 FTP Listening Channel Does Not Have Proxy Support The Generic FTP-1.0 protocol for a listening channel does not have proxy support.The wording states listening channel, but it also applies for delivery channel.

    Read the article

  • BizTalk 2009 - The Community ODBC Adapter: Send Port

    - by Stuart Brierley
    I have previously talked about the installation of the Community ODBC adapter and also using the ODBC adapter to generate schemas and laterly the creation of a receive port using the ODBC Adapter.  But what about creating a send port? Select to add a new Send Port, select the ODBC Adapter and click configure. Clicking Connection string will open the DataSource window. Choose one of your system datasources and press OK. This will now update the Transport properties.  Select okay. All that remains is to set the standard send port properties and your ODBC send port is now ready.

    Read the article

  • Timeouts in WCF and their default values

      There are a lot of timeouts in WCF. let us summarize it here. Timeouts on binding These are the most well known timeouts. SendTimeout, ReceiveTimeout, OpenTimeout and CloseTimeout. They can be set easily either through config or code on the Binding. The default value for those are 1 minute.  E.g in code Binding binding = new NetTcpBinding(SecurityMode.Transport) { SendTimeout = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(10), ReceiveTimeout = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(10), OpenTimeout...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • WIF, ADFS 2 and WCF&ndash;Part 5: Service Client (more Flexibility with WSTrustChannelFactory)

    - by Your DisplayName here!
    See the previous posts first. WIF includes an API to manually request tokens from a token service. This gives you more control over the request and more flexibility since you can use your own token caching scheme instead of being bound to the channel object lifetime. The API is straightforward. You first request a token from the STS and then use that token to create a channel to the relying party service. I’d recommend using the WS-Trust bindings that ship with WIF to talk to ADFS 2 – they are pre-configured to match the binding configuration of the ADFS 2 endpoints. The following code requests a token for a WCF service from ADFS 2: private static SecurityToken GetToken() {     // Windows authentication over transport security     var factory = new WSTrustChannelFactory(         new WindowsWSTrustBinding(SecurityMode.Transport),         stsEndpoint);     factory.TrustVersion = TrustVersion.WSTrust13;       var rst = new RequestSecurityToken     {         RequestType = RequestTypes.Issue,         AppliesTo = new EndpointAddress(svcEndpoint),         KeyType = KeyTypes.Symmetric     };       var channel = factory.CreateChannel();     return channel.Issue(rst); } Afterwards, the returned token can be used to create a channel to the service. Again WIF has some helper methods here that make this very easy: private static void CallService(SecurityToken token) {     // create binding and turn off sessions     var binding = new WS2007FederationHttpBinding(         WSFederationHttpSecurityMode.TransportWithMessageCredential);     binding.Security.Message.EstablishSecurityContext = false;       // create factory and enable WIF plumbing     var factory = new ChannelFactory<IService>(binding, new EndpointAddress(svcEndpoint));     factory.ConfigureChannelFactory<IService>();       // turn off CardSpace - we already have the token     factory.Credentials.SupportInteractive = false;       var channel = factory.CreateChannelWithIssuedToken<IService>(token);       channel.GetClaims().ForEach(c =>         Console.WriteLine("{0}\n {1}\n  {2} ({3})\n",             c.ClaimType,             c.Value,             c.Issuer,             c.OriginalIssuer)); } Why is this approach more flexible? Well – some don’t like the configuration voodoo. That’s a valid reason for using the manual approach. You also get more control over the token request itself since you have full control over the RST message that gets send to the STS. One common parameter that you may want to set yourself is the appliesTo value. When you use the automatic token support in the WCF federation binding, the appliesTo is always the physical service address. This means in turn that this address will be used as the audience URI value in the SAML token. Well – this in turn means that when you have an application that consists of multiple services, you always have to configure all physical endpoint URLs in ADFS 2 and in the WIF configuration of the service(s). Having control over the appliesTo allows you to use more symbolic realm names, e.g. the base address or a completely logical name. Since the URL is never de-referenced you have some degree of freedom here. In the next post we will look at the necessary code to request multiple tokens in a call chain. This is a common scenario when you first have to acquire a token from an identity provider and have to send that on to a federation gateway or Resource STS. Stay tuned.

    Read the article

  • Securely expose WebService from Enterprise Network to Internet Client

    - by hotzen
    Are there any standards (or certified solutions) to expose a (Web-)Service to the internet from a very security-sensitive network (e.g. Banking/Finance)? I am not specifically talking about WS-* or any other transport-layer security á la SSL/TLS, rather about important standards or certifications that must be obeyed. Are there any known products (coming from an SAP-environment) that can provide a "high-security proxy" of some sort to expose specific web-services to the internet? Any buzzwords that a CIO/CTO is aware of about this subject?

    Read the article

  • Timeouts in WCF and their default values

      There are a lot of timeouts in WCF. let us summarize it here. Timeouts on binding These are the most well known timeouts. SendTimeout, ReceiveTimeout, OpenTimeout and CloseTimeout. They can be set easily either through config or code on the Binding. The default value for those are 1 minute.  E.g in code Binding binding = new NetTcpBinding(SecurityMode.Transport) { SendTimeout = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(10), ReceiveTimeout = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(10), OpenTimeout...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Internet Explorer 10 aborting some stylesheets

    - by Joe
    Strange problem exhibited only with IE10 on Windows 8. No other IE version, no other OS version. Some stylesheets are aborted, apparently in transport, intermittently. This seems to happen when there are three <link> tags in sequence. The tags are correctly specified and are being served from Amazon S3 over HTTPS. The first two items abort when (or prior to) loading. Altering the order of the items appears to make the first two items abort in all cases. This problem is intermittent, and different people can reproduce with differing success. I have seen a lot of conjecture about this on the web but no solution.

    Read the article

  • What was the first consumer-oriented hardware/software solution?

    - by Maksee
    We all know the story of the personal computer as a consumer-oriented product. But I just thought that real end user solution should have appeared before that time. So a product that was probably expensive, but allowed using it as a service charging for it, for example computer-terminal for transport time-table access or game machine. On the other site, the video terminals as we know them appeared not so long ago. So if there was something like this, this could be hardware/software most likely offering no interactivity, but probably printing some information based on user actions.

    Read the article

  • SAB BizTalk Archiving Pipeline Component v0.2

    - by Stuart Brierley
    Just released to Codeplex is an updated version of my archiving pipeline component for BizTalk. The changes in this release are: Addition of FTP adapter macros to the base macros and File adapter macros. Fix for the issue of garbage collection of data streams within pipelines as discussed in this previous blog entry. Now looks for OutboundTransportType in addition to InboundTransportType to pick up send port transport type; Therefore changed %InboundTransportType% macro to %TransportType%. An initial outline of the project can be read here.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24  | Next Page >